Famed atheist Richard Dawkins Tweeted a link Thursday peddling a 2007 video of Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney candidly discussing his Mormon faith. While Dawkins seemingly thought the video was an opportunity to lambaste Romney’s beliefs, supporters of the GOP candidate will likely enjoy the clip, as it shows his impassioned side as well as a defense of his pro-life position. And for those fearing Romney’s views on the separation of church and state, a separate clip from the same exchange may also provide some solace.
Let’s start with the clip that Dawkin’s shared. The video originated during a conversation that the candidate, then competing in the 2008 presidential campaign, was having with Jan Mickelson, a radio talk show host in Des Moines, Iowa. The discussion is particularly noteworthy because it unfolded during a commercial break and was, thus, somewhat more forthright and unscripted than are many theological and political debates.

Mitt Romney debating with radio host Jan Mickelson (Photo Credit: YouTube)
In the clip, Romney highlighted his views on Jesus’ return, clarified The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints’ theology and addressed criticism he has faced over his abortion views. He challenged Mickelson, telling him, “I understand my church better than you do” (he was responding to purportedly incorrect theological claims that Mickelson was outlining).
Romney defended his evolutionary abortion stance, claiming that his pro-life views are mostly rooted in his general belief that the procedure is morally wrong and that it is not beneficial to society — and not necessarily in the Mormon tradition. However, he also noted that pro-choice Mormons are not in violation of the church’s teaching simply because of their policy stance and thus at risk of excommunication.
“The church does not say that a member of our church has to be opposed to allowing choice in our society and therefore there are Mormon Democrats,” Romney explained, while noting that the main distinction is over whether an individual would personally encourage or perform an abortion (while supporting pro-choice policy is permitted for LDS adherents, personal abortion involvement is not).
Romney also noted the fact that he was tiring of constantly being bombarded about his faith.
“I’m not running as a Mormon and I get a little tired of going on a show like yours and it being all about Mormon,” he told Mickelson. ”I’m not running to talk about Mormonism.”
Watch the video, below:
While the former discussion occurred at the end of the radio interview, another spat unfolded just minutes earlier during a commercial break. Romney became impassioned when Mickelson accused him of “distancing” himself from the Mormon faith.
“I’m not distancing myself from my faith. I’m proud of my faith,” the candidate countered.
During this dialogue, Romney attempted to tackle church-state separatism and the lens through which he views policy-making. Rather than translating theological views to the law books, the presidential candidate takes a more balanced position — one that will simmer fears in those who incorrectly assume he is aiming for a theocracy.
“For instance, my church says that if you have sex outside marriage, that you should be excommunicated. Now, do we make a law that says that? No,” he said. “What a society makes as law and requires other people to do is not necessarily the same.”
Romney also noted the example of alcohol, highlighting that it is forbidden by his faith. That said, he would never think of imposing the regulation upon the state.
“My religion is for me and how I live my life,” he said. ”Don’t confuse what I do as a member of my faith to what I think should be done by government.”
Watch the entire interview, below (the church versus state discussion begins around 10:50):
To provide greater context regarding what caused the clashes between the two parties, Business Insider recaps some of the issues that Mickelson and Romney discussed on radio before their off-air debate ensued:
Earlier in the interview, Romney talks in detail about three other issues that have come up frequently during the current Presidential campaign. His responses offer considerable details on some of his positions, as well as how he arrived at them. These views will worry and/or reassure some conservatives and liberals alike.
- Abortion. Romney says he thinks Roe v. Wade should be overturned and explains how we would do it. This is consistent with his current platform, though some of his moderate supporters have assumed he will not try to have the law overturned.
- The relative authority of the Supreme Court vs. the President and Congress. To the radio host’s chagrin, Romney says he does not think that Presidents should just overrule Court decisions they disagree with or regard as unconstitutional. This will come as a relief to pretty much American whose views aren’t extreme.
- The separation of church and state. Those who are concerned that Romney’s allegiance to the Mormon Church might supersede his duties as President will be relieved to hear that he unequivocally supports the separation of church and state.
Most of Romney’s church versus state views, of course, were left out of Dawkins’ Twitter messaging. Instead, the atheist leader derided Romney’s views on Jesus’ return, sarcastically writing, “Bishop Romney thinks ‘reign’ is a transitive verb. And we need a war for Jesus to return. Give him the nuclear keys.”

This, of course, isn’t the first time the video has circulated. In a 2007 interview with Katie Couric, Romney claimed that he was “intense” during the exchange, but that he didn’t lose his temper. The candidate also said that he didn’t know that there was a camera recording the off-air exchange (he, in fact, referred to it as a “hidden camera,” although it may have simply been a standard studio camera that he was unaware of).
“There was a radio talkshow host the other day in Iowa that began drilling me about my faith,” Romney said. “And I became intense in confronting what he had said. And we went back and forth. Unbeknownst to me, he had a hidden camera on the console.”
On Thursday, blog Little Green Footballs apparently mistook the interview as having taken place during the 2012 campaign. The outlet was forced to print a correction to its original post, writing: “Correction: this video was not recorded recently, but in August of 2007. This doesn’t change its relevance though; the Mormon position on abortion, the subject that got Romney all worked up, is just as much of a sore point today.”
In the end, the clips provide insight into Romney’s views on a multitude of issues. Abortion and church-state separatism are two subjects that both liberals and conservatives, alike, have questioned the candidate on. These clips help to further frame his views on these matters, while also showcasing a level of passion that Romney has rarely exhibited in other venues.





















































































































Comments (266)
JRook
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:20amPerhaps the blaze should actually do a useful piece on what Christian theologians and scholars really say about the Mormon religion. Particularly with respect to it not being regarded as a Christian religion. You can’t deviate from the Christian trinity and claim to be a Christian religion.
Report this comment
THERAPTURCOMES
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:32amThey wont because they are owned by a MORMON
Report this comment
TomSawyer
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:34amMormons believe the most critical thing to be considered Christian: they believe that salvation can only occur as the result of accepting Jesus Christ as their personal savor. Expect to see Mormons in heaven.
Report this comment
KathyT
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:36amA Christian is someone who believes in Jesus Christ as his or her Savior. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (nicknamed “Mormons”) believe in God, the Eternal Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ and in the Holy Ghost.
KathyT
Report this comment
jungle J
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:42amyou fanaticism resembles terrorist ideology.
Report this comment
THERAPTURCOMES
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:43amTOMSAWYER
Utter ignorance
The mormon jesus is not the Jesus of the bible and any person trying to otherwise is guilty of Gal 1:8-9
Report this comment
00100111
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:45amMaybe you should worry about your own life and stop worrying about what other people believe? Or are you too driven by your liberal indoctrination to undermine everyone who doesn’t worship at the altar of govt?
Report this comment
Southerner01
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:47amHow about a useful piece looking at the theology taught at Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s church, and whether or not it really constitutes “Christianity” as any conventional person would define it. After all, that church was where Obama was “born again” and the only church he ever attended prior to his election as president.
Report this comment
one.dakine.howlie
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:48amThe Trinity argument is comical to me because Evangelical Christians like to tout how the Catholic Church is also not Christian and that’s why Evangelical Christianity came to be. Yet most Evangelical Churches share many of the same beliefs, specifically the Trinity idea, of the Catholic Church whom they claim they’ve separated themselves from. The Trinity is not mentioned once in the Bible. It was an idea created during the formation of the Nicean Creed which became the Catholic Church. I’m just glad that we only have to answer to Christ and not to the “Evangelical Christianity Club” rulebook on Christianity about whether we served Christ or not.
Report this comment
THERAPTURCOMES
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:50amKATHYT
(1) The mormon jesus is not the Jesus of the bible
(2) Mormons teach Polytheism, the bible teaches Monotheism
(3) Mormon teach that Christ is spirit brother to Lucifer
(4) Mormons teach that the fall in the garden of Eden was a GOOD THING contrary to what the bible teaches.
I can go on and on and on
Report this comment
Dauh
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:58amJROOK,
“Trinity” is not even Biblical and is a man-made, warped view of the truth–so get your facts straight. To be Christian is to emulate Christ and to accept him as your Savior, and to exercise your faith to that end goal. This is the foundational tenet of the LDS church.
Report this comment
mcsledge
Nov. 2, 2012 at 12:00pmJRook – You may want to do more reading in your Bible then espousing positions that are unsupported by the Bible.
God, Christ and the Holy Ghost are three separate and distinct beings. The Bible supports this 100%.
To believe that Christ and the Father are one being is to contradict the following:
- “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God.” (John 1:1-2)
- “And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. (Matt 3:17)
- “Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father” (John 20:17)
- “Hereafter shall the Son of man sit on the right hand of the power of God.” (Luke 22:69)
- “But he, being full of the Holy Ghost, looked up stedfastly into heaven, and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing on the right hand of God, 56 And said, Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God. (Acts 7:55)
- “And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is, God.” (Luke 18:19)
If one chose to follow your trinity concept, they would be forced into believing that Christ wanted the Twelve to be one [BEING] as well.
John 17:21 That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me. 22 And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one:
Report this comment
rx4nv
Nov. 2, 2012 at 12:02pmA theologian is just a PERSON who specializes in the study of religious faith, practice, and experience; especially : the study of God and of God’s relation to the world. In no way does being titled a theologian mean that their ideas are correct, it just means they have dedicated themselves to studying religion.
Report this comment
CS Lewis FAN
Nov. 2, 2012 at 12:04pmTO JROOK, who wrote “You can’t deviate from the Christian trinity and claim to be a Christian religion.”
The “Christian Trinity” as it is commonly accepted as God, Jesus and the Holy Ghost being one self-same person, was the INVENTION of the council of Nicea around 400 AD, where church leaders at the time, far removed from the enlightened, but executed original Apostles, tried to come up with a standardized doctrine and cannon. Not everyone agreed with it. The Greek Orthodox church went its own way and kept more of the original books in their cannon (bible). Jesus says we should be one as He and His Father are one. Just as we can’t jump back into the womb to be “reborn”, we can’t jump into his physical body. His point was we should be ONE IN PURPOSE. God the Father and His Son Jesus Christ have separate and distinct physical glorified bodies. To get clarity, read all of the bible in context. If you want additional light and knowledge, pray, and read the Book of Mormon. Spoken as a convert from Catholicism, the original creators of The Trinity, but wonderful people nonetheless.
Report this comment
FesteAinoriba
Nov. 2, 2012 at 12:10pmJROOK – Really?! Do you believe that? To paraphrase a living Apostle of Christ’s restored latterday church, you are saying that Mormons aren’t Christians because they don’t accept a non-biblical fourth century formulation on the nature of God? What then of the early Christians, many of whom knew the Savior personally, who didn’t believe such creeds either? Were they Christian? The fourth century trinitarian notions that you cite were strongly influenced by pagan philosophy, were established by debate and argument, are at clear odds with pronouncements made by the Christ Himself, and are internally inconsistent and self-contradictory because they are not true.
For a correct, simple and clear view of the nature of the Godhead and of Christ, see the following two discourses in which Elder Holland directly addresses critic’s assertions that Mormons aren’t “real” Christians. Then see his latest witness of what it really means to be a Christian (the third link). If you want an honest view of Mormon perspectives instead of the antagonistic caricatures that you’ve obviously swallowed with out thinking, read or watch the first two; but definitely watch the third one. Then you might be able to discuss the matter intelligently.
http://www.lds.org/general-conference/2007/10/the-only-true-god-and-jesus-christ-whom-he-hath-sent
http://www.lds.org/general-conference/2008/04/my-words-never-cease
http://www.lds.org/general-conference/2012/10/the-first-great-commandme
Report this comment
CS Lewis FAN
Nov. 2, 2012 at 12:13pmto THERAPTURCOMES: (1) The mormon jesus is not the Jesus of the bible – HOW DO YOU FIGURE?
(2) Mormons teach Polytheism, the bible teaches Monotheism – BIBLE SAYS WE ARE ALL GODS.
(3) Mormon teach that Christ is spirit brother to Lucifer – ISAIAH SPEAKS LUCIFER WAS A FALLEN ANGEL, WE’RE ALL EXISTED BEFORE EARTH AS SPIRIT CHILDREN (ANGELS) OF GOD, LUCIFER WAS OUR BROTHER & REBELLED AGAINST GOD’S PLAN & WAS CAST OUT ALONG WITH 1/3 OF THE HOSTS (BROTHERS & SISTERS) OF HEAVEN WHO FOLLOWED. DON’T BELIEVE ANGELS CAN FALL? LOOK AT SOME OF THE EVIL PEOPLE (BROTHERS & SISTERS) AROUND US….NOT YELLING, JUST CAN’T BOLD MY RESPONSE :)
(4) Mormons teach that the fall in the garden of Eden was a GOOD THING contrary to what the bible teaches. – IT’S CALLED THE PLAN OF SALVATION, MAN MUST FALL IN ORDER TO RAISE UP. IN THE GARDEN WE WERE WITHOUT SIN KNOWING GOOD FROM EVIL & THEREFORE DID NOT NEED A SAVIOR. ADAM FELL THAT MEN MIGHT BE (HAVE KIDS), AND MEN ARE THAT THEY MIGHT HAVE JOY (REDEMPTION & RESURRECTION & ETERNAL LIFE WITH GOD & CHRIST & FAMILY).
I can go on and on and on…SO CAN I. THE LDS CHURCH IS A GOOD THING FOR YOU AND ME. IT’S TO LIFT US UP, NOT DRIVE US APART. CHRIST IS THE CREATOR, SATAN IS THE DESTROYER. ARE YOU CREATING OR DESTROYING?
Report this comment
P8riot
Nov. 2, 2012 at 12:13pm@therapturcomes…
PLEASE read this post…
Will you PLEASE refrain from trying to tell people what OTHERS believe and stick to telling people what YOU believe??? Just like Romney had to tell the guy he was speaking to – we know our own religion better than you do.
If you have a real question, please visit http://www.mormon.org. If you don’t find the answer your seeking there, then please click on the “find a church” link on that same link – and then attend a Sunday worship service. If you still have questions, then feel free to ask the two young missionaries there to schedule an appointment with you. Additionally, we here will try to answer any of your questions, but none of us are official representatives of our Church. BUT – I for one will not get into a “bible-bashing” session with you. I’ve learned over the years that no one is edified when each side is simply trying to prove a point rather than invite the Holy Spirit into the conversation.
I’ll be frank – when you say things like “What a joke, mormonism on any level is a cult and if running for the office does not somehow negate the fact he is a mormon and a teacher of that satanic church” doesn’t exactly sound like someone speaking in a Christ-like manner.
I simply ask you to attempt to share your own testimony rather than try to belittle the beliefs of others.
BTW – this isn’t “martinez” or “mutiny” is it?
…
Report this comment
THERAPTURCOMES
Nov. 2, 2012 at 12:14pmMCSLEDGE
There is but one God and besides God there are no others
Exodus 9:14,,, Deut 4:35, 32:39,,, Isaiah 43:10, 44:6-8, 45:6,14,18,21, Isaiah 46:9, Isaiah 47:8, Joel 2:27 = MONOTHEISM
By your very words you show you mormons contradict the teachings of the bible
Report this comment
FesteAinoriba
Nov. 2, 2012 at 12:28pmJROOK – Really?! Do you believe that? To paraphrase a living Apostle of Christ’s restored latterday church, you are saying that Mormons aren’t Christians because they don’t accept a non-biblical fourth century formulation on the nature of God? What then of the early Christians, many of whom knew the Savior personally, who didn’t believe such creeds either? Were they Christian? The fourth century trinitarian notions that you cite were strongly influenced by pagan philosophy, were established by debate and argument, are at clear odds with pronouncements made by the Christ Himself, and are internally inconsistent and self-contradictory because they are not true.
For a correct, simple and clear view of the nature of the Godhead and of Christ, see the following two discourses in which Elder Holland directly addresses critic’s assertions that Mormons aren’t “real” Christians. Then see his latest witness of what it really means to be a Christian (the third link). If you want an honest view of Mormon perspectives instead of the antagonistic caricatures that you’ve obviously swallowed without thinking, read or watch the first two; but definitely watch the third one. Then you might be able to discuss the matter intelligently.
http://www.lds.org/general-conference/2007/10/the-only-true-god-and-jesus-christ-whom-he-hath-sent
http://www.lds.org/general-conference/2008/04/my-words-never-cease
http://www.lds.org/general-conference/2012/10/the-first-great-commandmen
Report this comment
FatManChew
Nov. 2, 2012 at 12:44pmBefore anyone starts mocking any other religion just remember that you have Christians who aren’t Christians because none of us will ever live up to God’s word. Let each and every man live their own lives and when they face God let them (me included) explain our actions.
Report this comment
fightinglee
Nov. 2, 2012 at 12:50pmMCSLEDGE – just reading all the posts here makes you realize, Mormons might be the only ones that actually read the bible. Its ironic really. If more “christians” actually studied the bible and didn’t just take their minister’s word for what’s in there, they might realize the Mormon church’s doctrine is closer to the pre-Nycean creed christian church. There are a lot of writings by early christians that show they never thought of God and Jesus as the same being. That is a manmade concept and was a political doctrine.
Most of them probably know little about Arius, a very influential Christian presbyter from Alexandria who at the time who was preaching against the trinity and teaching that Jesus Christ was not God the father, but actually a creation of the father and that most of his work and theology was destroyed by the catholic church. They also attempted to suppress the fact that this was a major controversy and the theology began long before him and was more prevalent than the idea of the trinity.
Not only that, but there are plenty of early christian writings that are very much against what came out of the creed. It’s sad that so many people base their beliefs on a creed founded by a ruler who did not even believe in the church he was constructing.
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 12:52pmChristianity and the CJCLDS are entirely different religions. They use the same words in their theologies but those words have entirely different definitions.
One may not be a Christian and denounce the Bible as incomplete and incorrect, insist that the Church which Christ founded has been overtaken by Satan until Joseph Smith restored it in 1830, then define Jesus as the literal offspring of a physical mating between an exalted man god and a mother god, who was resurrected from death as flesh and bone rather than a Glorified Spirit Body.
Neither may one consider themselves LDS if they denounce the BofM and believe that Joseph Smith was a woman born in Kentucky in 1888 and Jesus is the Only Begotten Son of the Father through the Holy Spirit and a virgin, and is also the One and Only, One true eternal God, who never was a man, is Spirit, no God’s have existed before or after, is creator of the universe ex nihilo and is manifest in the personages of Father, Son and Holy Spirit, known as the doctrine of the Trinity.
These are entirely different religions.
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 1:00pm@FIGHTINGLEE
Most LDS believe that the Bible is incomplete, corrupt, and given to us by councils.
Not true. http://www.gotquestions.org/canon-Bible.html
LDS Apostle B. H. Roberts wrote, “Saddening as the thought may seem, the Church founded by the labors of Jesus and His Apostles was destroyed from the earth; the Gospel was perverted; its ordinances were changed; its laws were transgressed; its covenant was, on the part of man, broken; and the world was left to flounder in the darkness of a long period of apostasy from God… a universal apostasy from the Christian doctrine and the Christian Church took place” (D.H.C., Vol. I, Introduction, pp. 39 and 41).
The Bible disagrees: “other foundation can no man lay than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ” (I Cor. 3:11). Since Jesus Christ is the Foundation of the church, could that church “collapse” or become extinct when the omnipotent Christ is the Foundation of it?
Is it possible for Christ to lose “the church of God which He hath purchased with His own blood” (Acts 20:28; Eph. 5:25)?
Christ is called the “Good Shepherd” in John 10:11. How can a “Good Shepherd” lose His sheep?
Report this comment
Kupo
Nov. 2, 2012 at 1:30pmThere are plenty of highly regarded early Christian theologians and scholars who blatantly rejected the idea of a trinity. If you choose to believe that the Father, Son and Holy Ghost are all the same person then fine, but that is NOT a litmus test for someone being a true Christian.
Report this comment
KathyT
Nov. 2, 2012 at 1:50pm“Mormons” believe the Bible to be the Word of God. They study the Old Testament and the New Testament as well as the Book of Mormon, which is another Testament of Jesus Christ.
Report this comment
P8riot
Nov. 2, 2012 at 1:53pm@kupo
Great point. It’s always funny when people say “you’re not a Christian unless you believe everything ‘I’ do” … however, the title “Christian” was a name first given to believers in Jesus Christ at Antioch in Syria, about A.D. 43 (Acts 11:26). Thus, ALL believers in Jesus Christ are Christians… including members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Report this comment
THERAPTURCOMES
Nov. 2, 2012 at 3:34pmP8RIOT
Gal 1:8-9 Teaching of ANOTHER GOSPEL tells it exactly as it is. Anyone with any amount of honesty that compares the teachings of the bible with mormonism will easily see that mormonism is not and has never been Christian.
From Genesis to Revelation mormonism contradicts the bible and anyone whom denies the trinity denied whom Christ is. THE EVERLASTING FATHER Isaiah 9:6
You do not have long to wait before the resurrection/rapture takes place and then you will see just how wrong you really are
Report this comment
Granny58
Nov. 2, 2012 at 4:23pmMy 2 cents – Jesus said The Father and I are one. Also, if you have seen me you have seen the Father.
Considering how sensitive Jews were to blasphemy, to equate oneself with the Father without ACTUALLY being one with the Father was unthinkable. It was no mere “one purpose” but one in being.
Report this comment
The Giver
Nov. 2, 2012 at 4:24pmJROOK, do you remember that the Pharisees could not recognize Christ? They were the experts. You think you are so clever… Yet this man Romney that you ridicule, has lived a life in keeping with Christ’s instructions. Christ did not start a religion, but a path. You are caught up in the minutiae. Very small.
I didn’t trust Romney, but thanks to this tape, I DO! Atheists don’t get it and don’t have to. When things hit the fan, they’ll ask trees to help them. Most of them are part of the Global Warming Religion.
Report this comment
joel228
Nov. 2, 2012 at 4:49pmGRANNY58, maybe this can shed some light on what Jesus wanted. To be one with them is not unthinkable but is the Father’s and Christ’s whole purpose and desire.
John 17
21 That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me.
22 And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one:
1 John 3:2
Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.
John 17:3
And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 4:51pm@KUPO can you name those scholars?
@KATHY Orson Pratt wrote: If it be admitted that the apostles and evangelists did write the books of the New Testament, that does not prove of itself that they were divinely inspired at the time they wrote…. Add all this imperfection to the uncertainty of the translation, and who, IN HIS RIGHT MIND could for one moment suppose the Bible in its present form to be a perfect guide? Who knows that even one verse of the Bible has escaped pollution, so as to convey the same sense now that it did in the original? (Divine Authority of the Book of Mormon, pp. 45, 47; read all of this pamphlet for a detailed attack upon the Bible).
@P8 Can I call myself LDS and denounce the Bok of Mormon as Scripture and Joseph Smith as a true prophet of God?
Report this comment
Favored93
Nov. 2, 2012 at 4:52pmGlenn beck is a Mormon …. That being said I have heard him give the plan of salvation BETTER and with more passion on the air then I have on TBN! I DO NOT BELIEVE Mormonism is apart of the Christian family but do believe that we will see Mormons in Heaven. This may sound like a contradiction but like I said … Glenn is a Mormon and I have NO DOUBT HE KNOWS JESUS and if there is one of him there are thousands!
I have come to believe that Mitt is an honorable man although he was the last GOP candidate I wanted to see go up against Obama. Does Mitt know Jesus? …. I have no clue. Does it matter? YES however it only matters for HIS sake NOT ours.
I do not think Mitt can save this nation from the coming financial destruction that Obama has basically ensured is coming but I do think he will put us on the right road. My fear is that he will get into office and 4 years from now things are worse and he will get the blame…will he deserve it as Obama does now? That will depend on what he does. If he stops spending frivolously and cuts taxes as he promised to do then I would say not but my gut says even if he is all we hope he will be it will not be enough.
Small limited Govt. will hurt the dependent class for a little while but will save the nation! I do think and hope that is what a Romney administration will bring us back to. If not our votes do not matter.
Report this comment
joel228
Nov. 2, 2012 at 4:58pmGranny58, yet he was not suggesting everyone merges to one undefined substance
John 20:17
Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God.
Report this comment
THERAPTURCOMES
Nov. 2, 2012 at 4:58pmFAVORED93
That is the whole point, Glenn Beck gives ANOTHER GOSPEL as taught by Gal 1:8-9
He promotes ANOTHER CHRIST A christ not of the bible
Report this comment
title_of_liberty
Nov. 2, 2012 at 4:59pmIt matters not if the world considers us “Christians” or not. We very much are Christians and we know it and God knows it. If we don’t fit into your narrow definition that’s your problem not mine. So please enough with the name calling.
Report this comment
USAMama
Nov. 2, 2012 at 5:01pmAs opposed to a church based on Marxist principles that believes in collective salvation, that you personally can’t get into heaven unless everyone subscribes to these principles and are saved collectively. You want to see theocracy, give Obama a 2nd term. The mask will come off.
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 5:03pmIt’s laughable (and hypocritical) that LDS use the Bible (loose leaf, I might add) as proof text for their gospel, which says the Bible is corrupt, incomplete, uninspired and only should be believed as far as your conscience allows you.
How convenient for your conscience.
Report this comment
title_of_liberty
Nov. 2, 2012 at 5:07pm@theotherberean Unless you are a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints you are not LDS. Same as you are not Catholic unless you are a member of the Catholic Church.
Report this comment
THERAPTURCOMES
Nov. 2, 2012 at 5:20pmTOL
Mormonism and Catholicism are cults
Report this comment
Chuck Stein
Nov. 2, 2012 at 5:32pm@ JROOK
Sure, you can’t deviate from the trinitarian Christian trinity and claim to be a TRINITARIAN Christian religion. Of course, not all Christian religions are trinitarian. Careful with allowing the Council of Nicea to rule you.
Report this comment
title_of_liberty
Nov. 2, 2012 at 5:33pm@therapturecomes And I’m sure that you’re definition of cult includes everybody that does not believe exactly the same as you do, right?
Report this comment
rickbob
Nov. 2, 2012 at 5:44pmTee, hee. Please find for me a definition of “Christian” in the Scriptures. Tee, hee. You can’t because it’s not there. It is the machinations of men who have defined Christianity and who is and isn’t a Christian. Mormons, “by their fruits”, are more Christian than most Protestants OR Catholics.
Report this comment
THERAPTURCOMES
Nov. 2, 2012 at 5:50pmTOL
As defined by the bible, Gal 1:8-9
The identity of Christ is clearly given in the bible and He is ‘NOT’ the spirit brother to Lucifer. He is one of a trinity. One being three personages
He is ‘THE’ GOD, ‘THE EVERLASTING FATHER, ‘THE’ I AM, ‘THE’ CREATOR of all that is created.
He is God incarnate, which means He is God the Father in FLESH
Report this comment
joedoesky
Nov. 2, 2012 at 5:51pmAnother Obama troll trying to stir up hatred between people of faith.
As Jewish Dennis Prager points out what matters are VALUES. I as a christian am in perfect alignment with the VALUES of Mormons (and Jews and others). I don’t necessarily agree with Morman theology, but we share the same end values.
In stark contrast are the vile values of Obama and his Democratic party that booed and hissed God and Israel 3 times on national TV on the floor of their convention. If that doesn’t make things starkly clear then you are hopeless.
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 6:14pm@TITLE said: “Unless you are a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints you are not LDS. Same as you are not Catholic unless you are a member of the Catholic Church.”
So if I don’t believe as you do I’m not LDS?
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 6:20pm@RICKBOB
Followers of Christ were first called Christians in Antioch. Acts 11:26; 26:28; 1Peter 4:16;
Report this comment
title_of_liberty
Nov. 2, 2012 at 6:32pm@Theotherberean Unlike the term Christian which refers to numerous different denominations, the term LDS refers only to members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Stop trying to trick me with wordplay.
Report this comment
QuincySmith
Nov. 2, 2012 at 7:11pmTHERAPTURCOMES;
It is interesting that you are so certain in your beliefs and criticisms. I have to ask if you read Greek and Hebrew. Have you EVER translated and biblical verses, have you compared biblical verses with the original texts? Have you compared biblical verses from one translation to another? If you answer no to these questions, I have more: If there is only ONE Bible, why do we have so many translations/versions? How do you explain discrepancies from one translation to another? There are more, but these will suffice for the moment.
Report this comment
THERAPTURCOMES
Nov. 2, 2012 at 7:25pmObama was brought to the forefront to showcase the insanity of the liberals by those that control the world from behind the scene.
When Romney wins (by a landslide) the Obama liberal insane followers will riot and Romney will suppress them at the insistence of the people POW martial law.
Soon the resurrection/rapture will take place and chaos will be the rule of order and through this chaos the anti christ will emerge.
People, I beg you all, leave the cults like mormonism, Catholicism, SDA, JW, emergent church and be looking up for the blessed hope
Report this comment
Xplorer
Nov. 2, 2012 at 7:39pmI think it was Tony Evans that said, 3 things you will be amazed at when you arrive in heaven. 1. Who Is not there 2. Who Is there 3. Your there.
Report this comment
THERAPTURCOMES
Nov. 2, 2012 at 7:44pmQUINCYSMITH
I do not read Koine Greek or Hebrew, I do not need to. The whole points of the tongues speaking was the beginning stage of moving the Gospels out to the Hebrews and gentiles of other lands.
My faith is that God did this and that we do have a pure version of what He wants out. Of all the Translations and when I saw translations I do not mean Paraphrase like The Message. I mean actual translations.
We have over 24,000 ancient manuscript copies of the NT in four languages Koine Greek, Coptic, Syriac, Latin from the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th centuries.
They took these ancient NT manuscripts and cross referenced them for internal consistency of 99.5%. This means there is only a .5% variance. I think you would agree that is astounding.
We have the writings of the apostolic fathers and early church fathers that confirm validity of the NT
The bible gives places, names and dates as accurate history as testified by the apostles, apostolic fathers and early church fathers.
I know that My God has gotten His word out as he wants it.
What does the BOM (Book of mormon) have that even compares beyond the divination’s of a young man that had no language skills at all.
I have the word in my hands in English and need not go beyond that
Report this comment
P8riot
Nov. 2, 2012 at 7:45pm@THERAPTURCOMES
Sorry for the repeat question, but I’m really curious – Is this the moniker formerly known as “martinez” and then “mutiny” that I’ve had these same conversations with a hundred times? Just sayin that these talking points seem very familiar.
@theotherberean –
I’m still curious if you belong to the Berean Fellowship? Or maybe a Christadelphians or Berean Christadelphians? I only ask because the latter two groups (Protestant in nature) both deny the doctrine of the Trinity (which would be very relevant to the present conversation). It would be hard to believe your moniker accidentally touched on the Berean name.
Thanks both!
Report this comment
THERAPTURCOMES
Nov. 2, 2012 at 7:56pmP8RIOT
I do not understand what you are asking me? Please rephrase so that a simple person like me can understand.
Report this comment
Kupo
Nov. 2, 2012 at 8:12pmTHEOTHERBEREAN
Not going to spend all that much time going into it, but Irenaeus is a good place to start, as is Arius. Tertullian is also someone who had very…unorthodox views regarding the nature of God, Son, and Holy Ghost which contradict some of the basic tenants of Trinitarianism. Ironically, Tertullian is the guy who coined the term Trinity. You might also want to read the apologies of St. Justin Martyr.
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 8:13pm@TITLE
If anyone is trying to trick someone it’s you… claiming to be Christian while denouncing both the infallibility of the Bible and the Jesus of the Bible while proclaiming the Jesus and God whom Joseph Smith describes.
Not one of “the denominations” you talk about believe that God is an exalted man. Not one.
If I can’t believe that Joseph Smith is a woman born in Kentucky in 1888 and still be LDS, then how can you believe that God was once a man and still be Christian?
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 8:27pm@P8
You’re starting to weird me out now.
“I’m still curious if you belong to the Berean Fellowship?”
No
“Or maybe a Christadelphians or Berean Christadelphians?”
No
I belong to Jesus Christ.
“I only ask because the latter two groups (Protestant in nature) both deny the doctrine of the Trinity (which would be very relevant to the present conversation).
The following is not my site, but I agree with their statement of faith
http://www.gotquestions.org/faith.html
“It would be hard to believe your moniker accidentally touched on the Berean name.”
Yeah, about as hard to believe that you didn’t know what you were doing when you put P 8 and RIOT together.
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 8:44pm@TITLE said: “It matters not if the world considers us “Christians” or not. We very much are Christians and we know it and God knows it. If we don’t fit into your narrow definition that’s your problem not mine. So please enough with the name calling.”
Fine. Then it matters not what you consider LDS. I am very much LDS and I know it. God knows it. If I don’t fit into your narrow definition that’s your problem not mine. So please stop with the name calling.
Report this comment
R1dd1ck
Nov. 2, 2012 at 9:06pm@THERAPTURCOMES
You sound as a bad an Isamic Extremists. If you were a true Christian you would accept everyone as Jesus taught. Instead you want to bash other’s beliefs. I am have many Latter Day Saint friends. Not going to get into some heated debate because you won’t change your closed mind. Do a little more research instead listening to all the anti-mormon bashing twist on words you have heard or read. Guess you would rather have Obama in than someone who would let you live how you want. Block head.
Report this comment
THERAPTURCOMES
Nov. 2, 2012 at 9:31pmR1DD1CK
Moments after the resurrection/rapture, it will become clear, you will realize that you were wrong and that you were told so before it happens.
I go by the example of the apostles, that marked out false teachers and were not ALL INCLUSIVE and all but one died violent deaths preaching the gospel and pointing out the wolves in sheep’s clothing.
IN THE TWINKLE OF AN EYE
Report this comment
title_of_liberty
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:32pm@theotherberean You know what? Go and have fun telling people you’re LDS when you’re not. You clearly know very well that it is absurd. That is your choice.
As for those who want to know if we Mormons are Christians, the answer is yes. “We believe in God, the Eternal Father, and in His Son, Jesus Christ, and in the Holy Ghost.” (1st Article of Faith) The 2nd Article of Faith is also helpful in clearing the matter up: “We believe that through the Atonement of Christ, all mankind may be saved, by obedience to the laws and ordinances of the Gospel.” I fail to understand how we are unchristian. Thank you and good night.
Report this comment
black9897
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:49pm@ONE
The word trinity was never used, but the concept is still biblical. The Father, son, and Holy spirit. Not an easy thing to understand, I don’t fully understand it. Oh well. There are things we won’t grasp.
Report this comment
abefij
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:18pmWho would seek to divide us at this late date? If ye are not one ye are not mine.
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:20pm@TITLE
I probably have “more” fun telling Mormons I’m LDS while denouncing Joseph Smith and the BofM, than you do claiming to be a Christian while denying the infallibility of the Bible, that God is Eternal and only One and the Creator of the universe ex nihilo, and that Jesus Christ is His Only Begotten Son, the eternal offspring of the Holy Spirit and the virgin Mary.
It’s not that we think that you don’t believe in God and Jesus Christ, the problem is that Christians don’t recognize the God and Jesus Christ that you describe and define in LDS teachings. So how can you call yourselves Christians when you reject everything Christians believe? You won’t let me believe that Joseph Smith is a woman born in Kentucky in 1888 and still be LDS. Why should Christians allow you to believe in the wrong God and Jesus and still claim to be Christian?
You can’t have your cake, and Joseph Smith too.
Report this comment
tc5bwe
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:31pmPerhaps what you want isn’t relevant in the context of the news article.
Report this comment
Lonescrapper
Nov. 3, 2012 at 7:33amGranny58 – since Jesus was accused of blasphemy and taken to Herod for not only blasphemy but treason (saying he was King of the Jews), your point is moot.
Report this comment
JESSEBEGATDAVID
Nov. 3, 2012 at 9:23amjunglej, I couldn’t have said it better. Common sense is losing it’s footing in religion, AND FAST! perhaps jrook would fit in better with al quada
Report this comment
Jedi41
Nov. 3, 2012 at 10:42am“The American dream is not that every man must be level with every other man. The American dream is that every man must be free to become whatever God intends he should become.” Ronald Regan
Report this comment
Wayner
Nov. 3, 2012 at 7:07pmJROOK.. If you were quite the theological expert that you portend, you would know that to be valid in your assumption you would know that it would be the Christian Trinity… Any pronoun or name concerning God should be capitlaized.
Report this comment
HappyStretchedThin
Nov. 4, 2012 at 12:22am@Title: Wordplay is all TheOther’s got. When he attempts to corner people with his false claim to LDS membership as if it makes a point about who gets to decide who is Christian, he knows it doesn’t stand on substance, because it’s an apples and oranges comparison. He knows he lumps many groups under the umbrella term Christian who don’t agree with him on every point of doctrine, but won’t extend the same courtesy to the LDS. LDS have the right as an org to define their own membership, but Christianity isn’t an org, it’s an umbrella term for many orgs.
@TheOther: Your clever research skills are useless when you leave your closed-minded blinders on and ignore relevant context and real face-value testimony just to harp on a false point that you can’t give up under pain of admitting you’re wrong about something important. LDS read and believe the Bible, and use the BoM as a tool for disambiguation when there’s legitimate questions of interpretation in the Bible (The very fact of a SINGLE denominational difference should be proof to any thinking human that the Bible can be interpreted different ways.) Your Pratt quote is horribly out of context: he’s making the point that God has a pattern for revealing His will to humankind via living prophets such that even though human rules of evidence might not convince people of the Bible’s truth, God’s own way-through the Spirit-WILL confirm the truths of the Bible to sincere readers.
Stop lying about what the LDS believe ab
Report this comment
SparkyVA
Nov. 4, 2012 at 2:48pmFunny how little you know of the Christian religion and the origins of the Trinity doctrine that won acceptance in the council of Nice in 325 only after the bishops were intimidated by the murder of the bishop of Alexandria. The doctrine bears the fingerprints of Greek Theology, not Hebrew Theology. But then you wouldn’t want to question that “old time religion” thing – believing in the traditions of your fathers. The Trinity doctrine is abhorrent to believing Jews. Note: Jesus, and the apostles were believing Jews.
Report this comment
black9897
Nov. 4, 2012 at 6:29pm@HAPPY
That’s the problem, using something that’s not God’s word as a tool to interpret the Bible. I’m not suggesting we can’t use something to help us understand, or rather get a different point of view. That’s fine. It’s also fine to ask someone who is older and wiser, or just ask God for wisdom and understanding.
There’s not one single denomination, but hey, that’s life. Many of them aren’t even needed and may disagree with something trivial. You’ll find if you look close a lot know what’s right and correct, but due to their own selfish wants and or agenda they disregard it. I certainly don’t’ need the BoM, nor does anyone else.
Report this comment
HappyStretchedThin
Nov. 5, 2012 at 6:30am@Black
With all due respect, you reason funny. You called using something that’s not God’s Word as an interpretation aid for God’s Word: a problem. Of COURSE you’re correct.
But the LDS would say what they’re doing IS using God’s Word to aid in the interpretation of God’s Word.
If you discard out of hand the idea that the LDS claim the BoM TO BE the Word of God ALSO, then you’re completely missing the point (and an opportunity!)
Pratt’s point is that doctrinal differences among denominations, although SOMETIMES trivial, can actually be quite major! God is NOT the author of confusion, humans are. By human reasoning rules of evidence, people should be highly skeptical of a person accused of a crime who claims his own innocence, right? The Bible claims itself to be the Word of God, so how do you independently verify that? Pratt’s point was simply that there’s a method EXTERNAL to the Bible that ALL people have to use to gain a “testimony” of the truthfulness of the Bible’s claim that it IS, in fact, the Word of God.
Now, if you’re prepared to claim that the Bible itself ALSO claims to be infallible and the SOLE Word of God, then we can have a different discussion: I can’t find those claims in my KJV.
If, on the other hand, you’ll admit that these two claims are extra-biblical, and based on traditions or dogma, then I respectfully suggest you entertain the notion that God’s pattern of revelation to prophets wasn’t limited to the ones you’re familiar wit
Report this comment
black9897
Nov. 5, 2012 at 2:10pm@HAPPY
Good for LSD…now prove it. Since they are making the claim they must offer the proof. I do not make the claim because there is no proof to make one.
There is plenty of evidence that supports the Bible as God’s one and only word. Historical, scientific, etc. You can’t find it because you are looking for a blanket statement. It’s very self-evident. Why wouldn’t God’s word be infallible and the sole word of God?? So yes, the Bible is infallible and the sole word of God. You’re making an argument from ignorance…”can’t find it in my KJV, therefore it’s true.”
Report this comment
mike551
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:01amGrowing up, the next door neighbors were Morman. You will never meet a nicer, rmore upstanding, moral group of people. Five children, all turned out to be productive members of society. We could not have asked for better neighbors. As far as I know, none of them have blown themselves up. Imagine that. I have absolutley NO problem with Mitt Romney. IMPEACH THE MUSLIM OBAMA NOW!!! GET US OUT OF THE UN!!!
Report this comment
rx4nv
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:21amI loved that video clip. This is what a president should be like. Willing to stand up to the idiots that think they know more than the person who actually knows something. A non-Mormon in no way knows more about the Mormon church than even a partially active Mormon. A lawyer (but lifelong politician) as a senator or congressman in no way understands the working class or business or economics better than someone who has actually built a business, balanced budgets or been employing the working class. GO MITT!!!
Report this comment
THERAPTURCOMES
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:22amThe problem is that they teach a FALSE JESUS or in the words of the bible ANOTHER GOSPEL Gal 1:8-0
This same false gospel condemns people to the lake of fire. Does this sound moral and of peace to you????
Report this comment
watashbuddyfriend
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:24am@ mike551
Posted on November 2, 2012 at 11:01am
“Growing up, the next door neighbors were Morman. You will never meet a nicer, rmore upstanding, moral group of people….”
Just like one of the Catholic faith, I have never known a Mormon that was not of good character!
Anyone has the right to choose….
Report this comment
rx4nv
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:49amTherapturecomes- that Jesus of which you speak is your Jesus, who is to say He is the right Jesus? All that scripture says is if they teach a different gospel, they are accursed. Is the version of gospel you are taught the right one or is it other than He would have taught. I think you can see that many churches teach from the Bible, Mormons included, and each has a slightly different interpretation (for Heaven’s sake, there are even different versions of the Bible). Which is correct? They can’t all be right, for they teach different things. Why is yours right? Why are the Mormons wrong? How do you justify your comments, other than, “because I said so”?
Report this comment
saranda
Nov. 2, 2012 at 12:33pmTo paraphrase Gandhi,
I like your mormons I do not like your mormon god. Your god is so unlike your mormons.
Report this comment
FesteAinoriba
Nov. 2, 2012 at 1:02pmTheRaptureComes – There are only two possible Christian Religions that have divine authority: The Catholic or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. If the Protestants are right, divine authority was withdrawn as the early Church drifted into apostasy, changed the ordinances, and polluted the doctrines. If not, the Protestants were apostate. Protestant churches were right to proclaim that the true doctrines had become corrupted by man and needed to be fixed; but fail to acknowledge that they inherited corruption themselves. We proclaim that reformation by sifting through contaminated and corrupt doctrines and using the faculties of fallen man to try to rebuild the simple and pure gospel is an exercise in futility and spawned a proliferation of different doctrines. The only real solution is restoration through revelation – which was prophesied to occur in the last days by Christ, His Apostles, and by old testament prophets as well. You are like the Jews of old who rejected the revealed Christ and clung tenaciously to their corrupted interpretations and traditions built upon broken artifacts from prior dispensations. Your proclamation that Mormons worship a “different Christ” is the same song sung by pharisees when they told Christ that they didn’t recognize him because he didn’t fit the traditional doctrines and teaching handed down by Moses. Mark my word – unless you humble yourself and seek truth, your judgment will be turned on you verbatim.
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 1:18pm@FEAST
I think you should bone up on the differences between the teachings of the CJCLDS and Christianity. They are entirely different religions.
LDS:
http://tinyurl.com/8o2uzzl
http://tinyurl.com/9e4ec97
Christian:
http://www.gotquestions.org/faith.html
Report this comment
SparkyVA
Nov. 4, 2012 at 3:06pm@THERAPTURCOMES Christ once had a conversation with a young many about gaining the kingdom. The young man said “This I have done all the years of my life”. Christ said the young man lacked one thing: he was to go and sell all that he had and follow Christ. So to you lack one thing – humility. You know you are right and are quite proud of it. Give up your pride and and your intellectually constructed religion and go and feed the hungry. When you are no longer proud, you will be closer to Christ.
Report this comment
IMCHRISTIAN
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:57amFaith is so important in whatever we do in life. I definitely have more faith in Gov. Romney then I do a man that has put our debts on our future generation with useless investments and who knows where it all went and in who’s pockets. Until we straighten out in this country and get back where good morals is the best for all then we will have chaos and then this USA that I have known will be lost. ..I believe in truth not lies…..good not evil….
love not hate.. Life is short Eternity is forever………. God is number one.
Report this comment
revelation2012
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:25pmGlory to GOD
Report this comment
drphil69
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:57amLets flip the lefts logic –
The left says, “If you are pro-life, you want to force that on everyone.”
So the converse is, “If you are pro-abortion, you want to force that on everyone.”
Therefore, using the left’s “logic,” FORCED ABORTIONS FOR EVERYONE!!
Report this comment
SimpleTruths
Nov. 2, 2012 at 12:32pmYour logic is totally flawed. Given someone the choice to have an abortion is NOT forcing them to have an abortion. However outlawing abortion IS forcing your belief system on them.
Report this comment
FesteAinoriba
Nov. 2, 2012 at 1:25pmThe state has no legitimate authority to legislate morality. However, it is supposed to protect all individuals’ right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The only legitimate role of government is in securing those rights and protecting the governed from encroachments on those rights from other individuals, groups, peoples, or nations. Regarding abortion – the defining question is whether or not a viable fetus qualifies as a person. If yes, then it is legally impermissible to take that life in order to avoid the legal consequences of your actions. If you argue that the unborn child is not an individual because it is dependent on its mother’ for sustenance, then should I have the right to deny life to any individual who is dependent upon me for their sustenance? Democrats used to argue that Blacks were not really people and therefore not entitled to legal protection. I find similar arguments about unborn babies to be similarly suspect and odious – particularly for later term unborn children who would be viable if delivered.
Report this comment
kindling
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:54amHow appropriate that Romney is called President Romney within the church. I can’t wait until he is called President Romney outside the church too.
Report this comment
Lesterp
Nov. 2, 2012 at 4:04pmLove the sound of that!
Report this comment
The Giver
Nov. 2, 2012 at 4:46pmPRESIDENT ROMNEY! May God grant us this man as our leader.
Report this comment
kindling
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:52amThe Mormon faith does not excommunicate someone for any reason other than attitude. If you are not remorseful of making a BAD mistake you are taken from a position of a great fall to one of a lesser fall. You are always given a chance to repent and start the climb again. The big mistake is thinking the climb is only within the Mormon church…..which is isn’t.
Report this comment
rockymtngal
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:48amObama claims to be a Christian, and he said he’s sat in Rev Wright’s church for 20 years and never heard Wright preach about hating white people or damning our nation. Then, when it became too politically “hot” he dumped Wright like a hot potato. Let’s talk about the character of both men. Obama turned his back on those who were requesting help in benghazi. He is tweeting people during Hurricane Sandy to have his back. This is not someone I want leading our nation! Obama hasn’t walked his talk and we are paying the price for those who hung on his “hope and change.” That hasn’t happened. I’ll take Romney because he walks his talk & I believe that he WILL change America for the better.
Report this comment
HuskerDave
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:45amJust remember that we aren’t supposed to ask any questions about Obama’s church, pastor, ambiguity about Christianity/Islam/Liberation Theology.
On the other hand, hair-brained conspiracy theories about Mitt Romney’s faith are fair game.
I am actually delighted to see the ‘elite’ liberals continuing to beat the abortion drum. They really think it’s the enlightened view to support infanticide. They believe it’s a winning issue – and I remain confident that most Americans don’t see it that way. I think most people are pro-life.
Romney in a landslide.
Report this comment
Lonescrapper
Nov. 3, 2012 at 7:35amAgreed. The more they push abortion, the less popular it becomes with Americans. They are their own worst enemy.
Report this comment
jaz57
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:36amAs a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormons), LOVE this video clip! LOVE, LOVE, LOVE!
Report this comment
LetUsReason
Nov. 2, 2012 at 3:08pmI am with you brother/sister. Isn’t it funny how whenever any mention of anything Mormon (or Utah, for that matter) comes on to this site, the haters, bigots, and those who think they’ve already saved themselves, come out swinging. That said, there are a lot of great non-Mormons on here, too, that come to our defense. However, I am always amazed that we keep fighting the same battles on here in arguing over definitions and semantics and whose church Jesus belongs to.
Report this comment
displaced
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:36amPraying to Mary and saints….believing that a priest must intercede for our sins….that sounds like a Cult too.
Report this comment
floridareader
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:53amCatholics have priests to confess our sins and find reconciliation with God. Does that sound like a cult to you?
Report this comment
Frogdaddy
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:08amAt least refer to us as Catholics when you insult. Know your enemy by its name. Don’t beat around the bush. Be brave. The next crusade you’ll be wishing there was a Catholic next to you.
Report this comment
THERAPTURCOMES
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:20amThat’s because it is a CULT
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 1:22pmLet’s be nice and call it a pseudo-Christian religion.
Report this comment
displaced
Nov. 2, 2012 at 2:36pmOkay. Catholics. You are a Cult. I was raised one and after 40 years know that it is a cult. It’s okay. I am sure Mary will get you all in Heaven. I lived this crap for so long. I don’t want to offend anyone but before any Catholic calls someones faith a cult they may want to do a little research.
Report this comment
txannie
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:33amRichard Dawkins tin-foil hat fell off. He’s trying to find himself and looking in all the wrong places.
Report this comment
DennisNJ
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:30amEscalator to hell need to be sized bigger because its going to carry many.
Report this comment
An_American_Thinker
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:27amOur current president received counseling from Rev. Wright only to find a comfort level with Christianity, there was no “conversion” per Rev. Wright. From what faith was he not converted? The inscription on his ring answers that question. Our current president has done everything in his power to help bring along the Caliphate, while sitting in the American White House. And you’re worried about a Christian?
Report this comment
nana35
Nov. 5, 2012 at 4:22pmAfter reading about how I should think about where to find my God in all the above comments it sure gives me a feeling that maybe we all should get one of those traveling preachers that throws a tent in the woods and preaches beside a creek so we can all get the holy gost again.
Stop it people everyone has a church and a pastor if they need help I feel sure they know it and will seek help there.
Report this comment
Pork_Anvil
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:20amDispatches from the planet Kolob!
Report this comment
The citizen who cares
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:33amShows how much you know.
Report this comment
00100111
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:47amHow cute, Porky is still derping around on the internet.
Report this comment
KathyT
Nov. 2, 2012 at 2:11pmWow, Mr. Pork, you don’t know “Mormon” women, who are also mothers, very well. When I get upset with my 22 year-old son for doing something stupid he still backs way off when I get in his face about it.
Report this comment
Ilikepeople
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:17amNow Richard Dawkins, now don’t you ever tell me that you aren’t a sheep herder, because you do a fine job herding the sheep back into church.
Report this comment
jefftavolieri
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:13amThe contents of the video should be deeply disturbing to any Christian. The man is in a cult. A bizzare, ridiculous cult.
Report this comment
Gonzo
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:27amSo is Obama, Marxism. At least Romney won’t push Mormonism on us…unlike Obama and his cult.
Report this comment
txannie
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:35amTHANK YOU, GONZO…finally a statement with some brain behind it!
Report this comment
Pork_Anvil
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:58amIn the mormon cult, a 12 year old boy has more power and authority than any woman. also, little white boys were given more authority than black people until they were forced to change in 1978. totally nuts.
Report this comment
Gonzo
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:03amHey Pork, is Romney forcing the country to go Morman? Hell no. Is Obama forcing communism on us? Hell yes.
Report this comment
one.dakine.howlie
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:18amYou don’t have a clue what you’re talking about. It’s because of people like you that members of the LDS Church like me and Mr. Romney sometimes get so disgusted with having to listen to people like you tell me what my church teaches. You haven’t stepped one foot inside an LDS chapel so how could you possibly claim to know a thing about what the LDS Church teaches???
Report this comment
Pork_Anvil
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:25am@One, you’re a liar.
@Gonzo, stock market up, economy brought back from the brink…Obama is the worst communist ever! Go brush your teeth.
Report this comment
rx4nv
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:42amPork– What you and many do not understand about the Priesthood, is that it is not POWER. The Priesthood is the AUTHORITY to act in God’s name. Christ was acting in his father’s name while he was teaching the elders at the temple when he was 12 years old. Another fact about the Priesthood is that it is not an AUTHORITY (or “power” as you put it) to be used for the individual’s benefit. The Priesthood can only be exercised by using it to benefit others (ie giving of blessings, performing ordinances such as baptism and marriage, to perform acts such as blessing and passing of the sacrament). The POWER of the Priesthood comes as you perform these tasks honorably. If anyone who has the AUTHORITY of the Priesthood misuses it (ie using it to show power or force things onto others…) the POWER (ie God fulfilling that act of the Priesthood performed in his name) is not there, as God withdraws himself from that individual. So in essence, the complaint that white men are given this power and women, children and blacks are not, is a greedy statement on behalf of the person making it. Women, Children and Blacks all receive the benefits of the Priesthood. The only way a priesthood holder receives benefits of the Priesthood is from another Priesthood holder. Think of the Priesthood as a duty to give to others, not to have power over others.
Report this comment
justangry
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:43am@jefftavolieri, I think it’s a cult too, but so what? That doesn’t make it bad, or it’s members are bad people. I think a lot of people’s beliefs here are whacky and I expect they think the same of mine. (actually I know because of the vile posts about the wretched nonbelievers) I still like some of them. I wouldn’t blame you for disliking Romney if it was based on him being a giant liberal douche bag, but I wouldn’t hold his religious beliefs against him as ridiculous as they are. I mean really he just believes what his parents told him is right and there’s a couple of cool Mormons that post here.
Report this comment
Pork_Anvil
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:49amRX4NV says “Women, Children and Blacks all receive the benefits of the Priesthood. ”
You forgot to add “as of 1978″ to that. Slow to evolve? I wouldn’t even called that evolving. I’d call that “being totally called out on nonsense.”
Report this comment
Gonzo
Nov. 2, 2012 at 1:33pmThe stock market is up because of constant government stimulus you moron and we’re ON the brink not back from it.
Report this comment
Pork_Anvil
Nov. 2, 2012 at 1:55pmGonzo, you sound bitter and unemployed. Stop waiting for government to find you a job. Get one, you bum.
Report this comment
KathyT
Nov. 2, 2012 at 2:33pmI can’t believe that there are still people who believe that “Mormonism” is a cult. One of the key aspects of a cult is Mind Control. This would include, but not be limited to, what is called ENTRAPMENT which is an isolation from friends, relatives and the mainstream culture. Also, their access to information is severely controlled. Is Mitt and his family isolated from the mainstream culture? Is he being denied access to information? Seriously, cult members don’t go to Ivy League schools or run for President of the United States….they are hold up in a compound somewhere drinking kool-aid.
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 4:57pm@RX4NV
The Bible seems to disagree with your Church’s claim to “authority.”
Jesus came to them and spoke to them, saying, “All authority has been given to me in heaven and on earth. Matt 28:18
Report this comment
FesteAinoriba
Nov. 2, 2012 at 6:06pm@Theother Where does the Bible say that Revelation has ceased and that there can be no more scripture. Where do you find the Trinity, as formulated in the creeds, in the Bible. If the Bible is sufficient and final, why did man need to add these creeds to it. If God is not corporeal, why did Christ resurrect His body from death and the grave. Why did He tell Mary not to touch Him because he hadn’t returned to the Father? What is the purpose of resurrecting the dead, if they are just destined to die again. The reality is that your view of what the Bible teaches is based on wresting the scriptures to fit your creeds. Your daring assertion that Mormonism’s Christ is a different one than you believe in, and that Mormonism teaches a different gospel than the one you interpret (by rationalizing the Bible through the lens of man-made creeds) should be sincerely, and humbly examined. Your beliefs, as far as they are true are to be commended, but your refusal to accept greater light and knowledge by imposing arbitrary limits on what God is allowed to do, say, be; or how He is allowed to act in the affairs of man will be your undoing. Damnation is the refusal to accept greater truth: “I will go this far, but no farther!”
The Jews rejected Christ when he didn’t conform to their traditions and understanding of scripture. If the latter-day revealed glory/nature of Christ doesn’t conform to your traditions and interpretations, perhaps you should change your frame of reference.
Report this comment
FesteAinoriba
Nov. 2, 2012 at 6:39pmThose who deny the power of God to speak new truth through modern prophets, who deny that Christ really resurrected and is a Corporeal God, who deny the prophecies of a latter-day restitution/restoration of all keys, powers, authorities, truths, doctrines and ordinance, who dare declare that God has spoken and cannot speak further: perhaps it is you (theother and therapture…) who believe a “different gospel”. I think the God you describe is fundamentally different in both nature and behavior than the one so clearly portrayed by a sincere reading of the Bible. You would be well-advised to limit your declarations to what is, rather than stepping into the precarious position of testify of “what is not”. You should really think about following the admonition of Paul. All things are possible to God, why would you decide to emphatically declare that there are some things that He cannot do. We bear witness of what is while you bear witness of what you will not believe. I know from the Holy Spirit that God will grant unto each man a fullness of what that man is willing to believe, accept, and desire. The atonement frees each man to choose his limits and destiny. The gospel is that, in a nutshell: ALL things are possible to him who believes and who loves Christ. By their fruits you may know them. Your accusatory caricatures of Christ and His Latter-day Church flow from a bitter and poisonous fountain. Deny the living Christ and His latter-day work at your peril.
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 9:37pm@FEST asked:
“Where does the Bible say that Revelation has ceased and that there can be no more scripture.”
http://www.gotquestions.org/cessationism.html
“Where do you find the Trinity, as formulated in the creeds, in the Bible.
http://www.blogos.org/gotquestions/bible-trinity.html
http://www.gotquestions.org/Trinity-Bible.html
“If the Bible is sufficient and final, why did man need to add these creeds to it.
The creeds add nothing to the Bible. They define the doctrines found therein.
“If God is not corporeal, why did Christ resurrect His body from death and the grave.”
http://www.gotquestions.org/resurrection-Christ-important.html
“Why did He tell Mary not to touch Him because he hadn’t returned to the Father?”
http://www.gotquestions.org/touch-Mary-Thomas.html
“What is the purpose of resurrecting the dead, if they are just destined to die again.”
This doesn’t compute.
“The reality is that your view of what the Bible teaches is based on wresting the scriptures to fit your creeds.”
No, actually it was the other way around. Your view of the Bible is that it is incomplete, corrupt and uninspired. Yet you still use it when necessary to support your LDS dogma.
Cont…
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 9:55pm@FEST asked:
“Where does the Bible say that Revelation has ceased and that there can be no more scripture.”
http://www.gotquestions.org/cessationism.html
“Where do you find the Trinity, as formulated in the creeds, in the Bible.
http://www.blogos.org/gotquestions/bible-trinity.html
http://www.gotquestions.org/Trinity-Bible.html
“If the Bible is sufficient and final, why did man need to add these creeds to it.
The creeds add nothing to the Bible. They define the doctrines found therein.
“If God is not corporeal, why did Christ resurrect His body from death and the grave.”
http://www.gotquestions.org/resurrection-Christ-important.html
“Why did He tell Mary not to touch Him because he hadn’t returned to the Father?”
http://www.gotquestions.org/touch-Mary-Thomas.html
“What is the purpose of resurrecting the dead, if they are just destined to die again.”
I didn’t know they were.
“The reality is that your view of what the Bible teaches is based on wresting the scriptures to fit your creeds.”
No, actually it was the other way around. Your view of the Bible is that it is incomplete, corrupt and uninspired. Yet you still use it when necessary to support your LDS dogma.
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 9:59pm@FEST asked:
“Where does the Bible say that Revelation has ceased and that there can be no more scripture.”
http://www.gotquestions.org/cessationism.html
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:03pm@FEST asked:
“Where do you find the Trinity, as formulated in the creeds, in the Bible.
http://www.blogos.org/gotquestions/bible-trinity.html
http://www.gotquestions.org/Trinity-Bible.html
“If the Bible is sufficient and final, why did man need to add these creeds to it.
The creeds add nothing to the Bible. They define the doctrines found therein.
“If God is not corporeal, why did Christ resurrect His body from death and the grave.”
http://www.gotquestions.org/resurrection-Christ-important.html
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:06pm@FEST asked: “Where do you find the Trinity, as formulated in the creeds, in the Bible.”
http://www.blogos.org/gotquestions/bible-trinity.html
http://www.gotquestions.org/Trinity-Bible.html
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:08pm@FEST asked: “If the Bible is sufficient and final, why did man need to add these creeds to it.”
The creeds add nothing to the Bible. They define the doctrines found therein.
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:09pm@FEST asked: “If God is not corporeal, why did Christ resurrect His body from death and the grave.”
http://www.gotquestions.org/resurrection-Christ-important.html
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:12pm@FEST asked: “Why did He tell Mary not to touch Him because he hadn’t returned to the Father?”
http://www.gotquestions.org/touch-Mary-Thomas.html
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:16pm@FEST asked: “What is the purpose of resurrecting the dead, if they are just destined to die again.”
I didn’t know they were.
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:20pm@FEST said: “The reality is that your view of what the Bible teaches is based on wresting the scriptures to fit your creeds.”
No, actually it was the other way around. Your view of the Bible is that it is incomplete, corrupt and uninspired. Yet you still use it when necessary to support LDS teaching.
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:25pm@FEST said: “Your daring assertion that Mormonism’s Christ is a different one than you believe in, and that Mormonism teaches a different gospel than the one you interpret (by rationalizing the Bible through the lens of man-made creeds) should be sincerely, and humbly examined.”
Actually, LDS teaching is where I get my information.
http://tinyurl.com/8o2uzzl
http://tinyurl.com/9e4ec97
“Your beliefs, as far as they are true are to be commended, but your refusal to accept greater light and knowledge by imposing arbitrary limits on what God is allowed to do, say, be; or how He is allowed to act in the affairs of man will be your undoing.”
So, should I believe a false prophet, or what the Bible has to say about these things?
“Damnation is the refusal to accept greater truth: “I will go this far, but no farther!”
Truth does not come from false prophets, and those who follow them will end up in the lake of fire for eternity.
“The Jews rejected Christ when he didn’t conform to their traditions and understanding of scripture. If the latter-day revealed glory/nature of Christ doesn’t conform to your traditions and interpretations, perhaps you should change your frame of reference.”
My frame of reference is the Bible. Yours is a false prophet. Teacher, teach thyself.
“Where does the BofM say that God is not a man?”
Where does it say that God “is” a man?
And next time, look these up for yourself please. I’m tired of doing
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:33pmdoing your homework.
and I apologize for all the posts. For some odd reason the server would not allow me to post more than a few characters at a time, until the last post.
Now that I’ve answered your questions, will you answer mine?
In LDS theology, the Holy Spirit comes only through the “laying on of hands” by those with priesthood authority (Mormon Doctrine by Bruce R. McConkie, 1966., p. 438). LDS scripture says that John the Baptist appeared to Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery in 1829 and laid his hands upon them and conferred the Aaronic Priesthood on them just “before” they were baptized (P. of G.P. J.S. History 1:68-73). Since LDS teach that baptism “must” precede receiving the priesthood, being yet unbaptized, Joseph was ineligible to receive the priesthood or baptize Oliver. Therefore how can both Oliver’s and Joseph’s baptisms and priesthoods be valid?
If the principle of “Progression” is unalterable, why has the principle broken down two out of three times right within the Godhead? (See the next two questions).
If Gods are individuals who have passed through mortality and have progressed to Godhood, how has one person of the Godhead (the Holy Spirit) attained Godhood without getting a body? (See Acts 5:3,4).
If Gods are individuals who have passed through an earth life to attain Godhood, how is it that one person of the Godhead (Jesus Christ) was God before He received a body or passed through earth life? (Matthew 1:23 and Hebrews 10
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:39pmMore questions for @FEST
If the Book of Mormon really contains the fullness of the gospel, why does it not teach the doctrine of “eternal progression”? (See Doctrine and Covenants 20:8, 9).
When God was a man (according to Mormon theology), where did He live before He could create a planet upon which to live?
When God number one was a man (before He became God), who created a planet upon which he (man number one) could live? (See Revelation 1:8; 4:11).
God said, “Is there a God beside me? Yea, there is no God; I know not any.” How can there be Gods who are Elohim’s ancestors? (See Isaiah 44:8 and Journal of Discourses, Vol. 1, pg. 123).
How can any men ever become Gods when the Bible says, “Before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me”? (See Isaiah 43:10).
Since Mormonism teaches that only God the Father had a physical body at the time Adam was created, why did God say, “Let us make man in OUR image”? Why didn’t He say, “Let us make man in MY image”? (See Genesis 1:26).
Report this comment
FesteAinoriba
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:44pm@Theother… I read the reference you posted, and I agree with much of the analysis, but find much of it to be flawed interpretations based on liberal inductive reasoning. Paul’s treatise on Charity wasn’t dismissing the importance of these other gifts, and the original greek makes it quite clear that Paul was teaching that the only virtue that has power to overcome all evil is charity or the pure Love of Christ. The ESV translation loses the original sense when it translates the conjugated form of the greek “katargeo” as “shall pass away”. The essence of the term in greek is “shall be futile and overcome or ineffectual” which is the point Paul is making – that the object of the gospel is to transform our hearts so that we are filled with the love of Christ and adopt His love for our fellowman: the objective of true discipleship. Paul clearly teaches that all other things will “fail” to give us power to overcome evil. Your article conveniently omits a very clear statement in 1 Corinthians 13:10 indicating that these various gifts of the Spirit won’t be done away with until that which is perfect has come – clearly looking to a future event – which can only mean the second Coming of the Savior in power at the end of the world to begin his millennial reign. In spite of this clear teaching by Paul, your article asserts that these gifts have already expired.
Report this comment
FesteAinoriba
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:35pmAlso, there is nothing in your article to justify the non-biblical belief that God’s words were done and that He will never reveal more, which was the question that you set out to answer. The article further suggests that the greek word “propheteia” means “to speak forth” and intimates that the translation to “prophesy” is misleading. My greek concordance says otherwise, and in fact Rev 19:10 uses the same greek term to teach that “The testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy”. Your obstinate assertion that your interpretation of the meaning of Biblical verses is beyond reproach and that the 4th century creeds don’t add doctrine, but merely “define Biblical doctrine” is so absurd that I have a hard time taking you seriously. Your strained ‘interpretations’ and creeds are full of transparent self-contradictions and internal inconsistencies that are a dead give away to any sincere truth seeker that they cannot be true and therefore cannot be a correct interpretation of the Bible (which can only be obtained under inspiration of the Spirit). We believe the Bible really is the Word of God and we love and cherish it. What we do not accept are your interpretations, tortuous logic and creeds that seek to interpret doctrine into the Bible that isn’t there. So were the the early followers of Christ who lived before 325AD (and never heard your trinitarian notions) Christian? If the Bible is final and complete, then whence the creeds, and exegesis that you rely
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:53pm@FEST
I posted more than one link. Did you follow them also?
Your Greek rendition still offers “futile and overcome or ineffectual.” That’s the point isn’t it?
And I could argue that prophecy in the NT means “speaking forth” or “proclaiming publicly.” I could also argue that even if Smith was a prophet of God, which he is not, he uttered false prophecies, which automatically disqualifies him as a prophet of God.
Will you answer my other questions?
Report this comment
FesteAinoriba
Nov. 3, 2012 at 12:02amTheOther said, “Your view of the Bible is that it is incomplete, corrupt and uninspired.” No sir, that is your view of Mormon belief, NOT Mormon belief at all. We believe the Bible is the inspired Word of God. However, we believe that its doctrines have been corrupted through mistranslations. Anyone who knows the history of the Bible also knows that it is a minor miracle that this much of the Apostolic writings were preserved in the face of bitter persecution and forces of apostasy. Any assertion that the Bible is complete and final is a non-biblical a priori assumption. I believe the vehement insistence that it is the final, complete and totally sufficient revelation from God derives from an utter refusal to entertain the notion that God is the same today as He was yesterday and that he engages mankind thru the same means that he did so anciently. It is so much easier to believe in sophisticated exegesis that rationalize ancient revelations than to accept the reality of living prophets and a living engaged God. Throughout history, societies have always loved dead prophets and Gods who are mute while murdering living prophets and rejecting the God Who makes real demands on them.
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 3, 2012 at 12:11am@FEST
Don’t get angry. LoL We’re exchanging ideas.
In the sense of the Old Testament prophetic office like Isaiah or Jeremiah, Jesus declared, “The law and prophets were until John [the Baptist]: since that time the Kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it” (Luke 16:16; see also Matt. 11:13).
The Bible also says, “God who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, hath in these last days spoken unto us by His Son” (Heb. 1:1-2).
And, Jesus declared, “…the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him (man) in the last day” (John 12:48). Note that the verbs are in the past tense. Thus, men will be judged in the future by what Jesus already taught during His earthly ministry and not by what some future “prophet” claims is God’s message.
Jesus warned, “Beware of false prophets who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves” (Matt. 7:15). Again He said, “Many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many” (Matt. 24:11). Are these warnings only for non-LDS people?
The problem with your “latter day prophets” argument, is that your prophets are, well, false prophets.
Report this comment
FesteAinoriba
Nov. 3, 2012 at 12:13amTheOther asks, “Since LDS teach that baptism “must” precede receiving the priesthood, being yet unbaptized, Joseph was ineligible to receive the priesthood or baptize Oliver. Therefore how can both Oliver’s and Joseph’s baptisms and priesthoods be valid?” Your assertion that this is a doctrine of the Church is not correct. Our doctrinal belief allows for exceptions to established practices. Practices are consistent with doctrine, but should not be confused with doctrine.
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 3, 2012 at 12:25am@FEST
Orson Pratt wrote:
“If it be admitted that the apostles and evangelists did write the books of the New Testament, that does not prove of itself that they were divinely inspired at the time they wrote…. Add all this imperfection to the uncertainty of the translation, and who, IN HIS RIGHT MIND could for one moment suppose the Bible in its present form to be a perfect guide? Who knows that even one verse of the Bible has escaped pollution, so as to convey the same sense now that it did in the original?” (Divine Authority of the Book of Mormon, pp. 45, 47; read all of this pamphlet for a detailed attack upon the Bible).
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 3, 2012 at 12:30am@FEST said: “Your assertion that this is a doctrine of the Church is not correct. Our doctrinal belief allows for exceptions to established practices. Practices are consistent with doctrine, but should not be confused with doctrine.”
I know. It’s like having official rules, until you need to defend them, then they aren’t official anymore. How convenient.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzypKxr9knA
Report this comment
FesteAinoriba
Nov. 3, 2012 at 1:05amTheOther asks, “If Gods are individuals who have passed through mortality and have progressed to Godhood…” This is not a correct reduction of Mormon theology and does not reflect our doctrine. The essential nature of God is spirit that has internalized a fullness of light and truth until it achieves sufficient knowledge and virtue that its motives, perspectives, outlook, objectives and behavior is singular to and common with any other divine being. God, in Mormon theology is the spiritual embodiment of all truth whether or not that spirit is clothed in flesh and bone. We do believe that a spirit housed in flesh and bone obtains a deeper appreciation and enhanced interaction with the Universe (power); and that having a body is not only desirable but essential for eternal progression; but we don’t believe that a body is required to internalize a fullness of truth which is a spiritual attribute and is the essence of Godhood.
Your question about the origin of God fails to close the logic. God always existed. Any being who has internalized a fullness of light & truth constitutes God, who is one with and identical to any other being in the same state. In that sense – there really is only one God. One should not presume that only one individual spirit can internalize a fullness of truth: denying God the power to replicate Himself. The erstwhile desire of God is to bring others to enjoy His state of existence and the process God uses is the same thru all eternity.
Report this comment
FesteAinoriba
Nov. 3, 2012 at 1:16amThe other asked, “God said, “Is there a God beside me? Yea, there is no God; I know not any.” How can there be Gods who are Elohim’s ancestors? (See Isaiah 44:8 and Journal of Discourses, Vol. 1, pg. 123).
How can any men ever become Gods when the Bible says, “Before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me”? (See Isaiah 43:10).
Since Mormonism teaches that only God the Father had a physical body at the time Adam was created, why did God say, “Let us make man in OUR image”? Why didn’t He say, “Let us make man in MY image”? (See Genesis 1:26).”
See my prior post. However, I want to emphasize, there is only one God as far as it concerns us . The Father of our spirits, and the Father of the Mortal Christ: Our Heavenly Father – whom Jesus told us to worship and pray to in His name and whom Jesus humbly acknowledged was greater than even Jesus was. Jesus is our advocate with the Father and lovingly satisfied the demands of justice so that the just demands of the great accuser, Satan, have no claim on those who accept His free gift via sincere belief, a grateful and willing heart, and a faithful determination to follow Him.
Report this comment
FesteAinoriba
Nov. 3, 2012 at 1:39amand finally, TheOther asked, “If the Book of Mormon really contains the fullness of the gospel, why does it not teach the doctrine of “eternal progression”? (See Doctrine and Covenants 20:8, 9).” You are confusing apples and oranges. The fulness of the gospel consists of a correct and complete presentation of the essential principles and beliefs that, when accepted and faithfully followed by determined disciples will lead you to know the Savior and obtain faith sufficient to realize the ends of the atonement unto salvation. The “fulness of the gospel” is not a declaration of all truth. The D&C contains additional revelations, but does not alter the gospel principles and beliefs that are clearly and unambiguously outlined in the Book of Mormon. In fact, we believe that God will yet reveal many great and important truths pertaining to the Kingdom of God; but none of those truths will alter the principals and beliefs constituting the fullness of the gospel of Jesus Christ.
Report this comment
FesteAinoriba
Nov. 3, 2012 at 1:48amTheOther says, “I know. It’s like having official rules, until you need to defend them, then they aren’t official anymore. How convenient.”
There you go again, insisting there is no difference between doctrine and practice, and then insisting that your belief that our practices and procedures are our doctrine was correct all along. Well, sir, your obstinate attempt to define our doctrine for us is dishonest.
Report this comment
FesteAinoriba
Nov. 3, 2012 at 1:54amTheOther said, “”@FEST asked: “What is the purpose of resurrecting the dead, if they are just destined to die again.”
I didn’t know they were.”
Interesting… So, do you believe that Christ died again after His resurrection, or is He still a corporeal being?
Report this comment
FesteAinoriba
Nov. 3, 2012 at 2:34am@TheOther, have you read the Book of Mormon in the spirit of seeking truth and have you asked God, with real intent in the name of Christ if it is true?
You stand in an entirely different frame of reference than I currently do. Every man surveys reality from his frame of reference. While Einstein proved that all frames of reference are “valid”, only God’s frame of reference is the true one. Meaning is dependent upon context and is inherent in the relationship of independent element comprising any system. When Copernicus observed the known Universe from a heliocentric frame of reference, the Universe seemed to magically distill into a very simple, ordered, comprehensible, symmetry that convinced him “that” was the correct frame of reference. I have sincerely and humbly studied the Bible and The Book of Mormon and bear witness to you that God showed me in a compelling and convincing way that the BofM complements and clarifies the Bible: dispelling false interpretations. The experience was a spiritual epiphany in which I felt that my perception was changed to a different frame of reference and everything suddenly made perfect sense and distilled into simple symmetry and harmony. At that moment the spirit etched into my understanding that Joseph Smith was a true prophet, the Book of Mormon is scripture in every aspect of the word, and that Christ is at the head of this church that bears His name and priesthood. God forces no man to see, but will give sight if you des
Report this comment
FesteAinoriba
Nov. 3, 2012 at 6:55amThe other asked, “I posted more than one link. Did you follow them also? Yes and they take simple truths and induce grand conclusions, the use circular logic to assert that their conclusions were what the verses actually said. Did you follow and read the three links I provided?
Your Greek rendition still offers “futile and overcome or ineffectual.” That’s the point isn’t it?. ”
Not when you draw the broader conclusion that spiritual gifts have ceased to exist. There is a difference between not being manifest at all, and being manifest but not sufficient to sustain your faith. And if faith fail, you are overcome by the world.
and, “And I could argue that prophecy in the NT means “speaking forth” or “proclaiming publicly.”
No greek scholar would agree with this translation. Your article was correct in this regard, the greek term doesn’t necessary connote making predictions, but it does connote more than speaking forth which lacks the essence of professing. The actual term connotes a bearing public witness of a heartfelt belief and witness of truth. Professing is perhaps the best english cognate. In full context, the term, as used in the New Testament is professing a belief , or witness, of Christ. See John’s declaration in Revelation that the spirit of Prophesy is the witness of Christ. The Spirit bears record of Christ by showing you that he is at the center of all creation, meaning, and purpose. This witness, professed, is the spirit or ess
Report this comment
FesteAinoriba
Nov. 3, 2012 at 11:06am@The Other – interesting, my comment was within the character count but still was cut off. The final sentence says,
“This witness, professed, is the essence of the spirit of prophecy.”
Report this comment
FesteAinoriba
Nov. 3, 2012 at 2:33pm@Theother – two final answers to your proddings: 1. In 1865, the First Presidency and Quorum of the 12 Apostles condemned much of Pratt’s speculations as in error. Pratt had a tendency to grand inductions like you do. His overreaching assertion that not one verse of the bible can be trusted is one such overreach that is not LDS doctrine. We do believe that while the Bible is the result of a valiant attempt by many to preserve the writings and sayings of the early Apostles and Jesus, that not all of those writings and teaching were successfully preserved. Prophets are NOT infallible even though you insist they be. We also believe that incorrect, subjective, prejudicial and selective opinions of later church fathers led to rejecting/restating valid scriptural material when they couldn’t harmonize them with their flawed interpretations and exegesis.
2. All of the apologetics you provided on the Trinity creeds honestly admit that the creeds are incomprehensible. But then make the absurd claim that some truth cannot be comprehended. You chafe at LDS doctrine that doesn’t harmonize with your view, but then willingly swallow this camel. The creeds openly assert that Man cannot know God in contradiction of Christ’s pronouncement that we are candidates for eternal life and that the essence of eternal life IS comprehending God.
ALL internally inconsistent and self-contradictory statements are false: it is false doctrines that cannot be comprehended.
Report this comment
Crotchety_conservative202
Nov. 4, 2012 at 12:22amBetter the Mormon than the Moron.
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 5, 2012 at 12:58pm@FEST
To wrangle around the truth so as to say that LDS theology teaches that there is only one God, (as far as it concerns us) is a blatant, and intended, deception. LDS theology clearly teaches polytheism. To deny that truth, is pathetically dishonest. And if you don’t practice LDS doctrine, why are you LDS?
Why do LDS have to lie for Christ? Is lying for Christ, Christ like?
Why would I want to be a Mormon if I have to lie for Christ? This is one of my pet peeves with Mormons. You should be up front about the differences in our theologies, but you deceive people trying to hide them. I find that reprehensible.
“There you go again, insisting there is no difference between doctrine and practice, and then insisting that your belief that our practices and procedures are our doctrine was correct all along. Well, sir, your obstinate attempt to define our doctrine for us is dishonest.”
No, there you go again straw man.But thanks for making my point about “official doctrine.” If you don’t practice your own doctrines, what good are they? Perhaps that’s why you don’t practice them? Or is it just easier to pick and choose what to practice while claiming to believe something else? How is that not dishonest? With a loose leaf Bible and a loose leaf BofM, divine newsletters and personal updates from God, you’ve got it made.
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 5, 2012 at 12:59pmcont…
You can believe anything you want, when you want, or not, and if anyone challenges you, just change your doctrine to suit your argument and then claim their argument is “not official. LoL Did you actually watch the video?
Yet, you won’t let me believe in a different Joseph Smith than you and still be LDS. The hypocrisy of your religion just never ends. It’s discussions like these that lead people to question LDS ability to think critically. We know you are not intellectually honest and will lie/deceive if necessary to defend one of Smith’s lies. The reason this is so complicated for LDS is because once you tell a lie you have to keep telling lies.
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 5, 2012 at 1:00pm“have you read the Book of Mormon in the spirit of seeking truth and have you asked God, with real intent in the name of Christ if it is true?”
Not cover to cover, nope. Neither do I intend to. I’ve read all 3 of the LDS standard works while trying to defend Christianity, so in a sense I’ve read it “in the spirit of seeking truth,” which for a Christian is by comparing it to the Bible. The Bible tells me not to follow the false prophet. Once I learned of Smith’s many false prophecies, and in fact that many LDS revelations are fraught with errors, corrections, assumptions, misinterpretations and the words of many false prophets, apostles and presidents, it was a done deal for me at that point. Ker-sploosh. No “epiphany” could ever change my mind about what the Bible says, and it shouldn’t because Jesus warned of false prophets who will come in sheeps clothing, and told us to cling to that which we have receive already, and even if it comes from an angel, which the BofM allegedly did. Even if you were right, although you’re not, that revelatory prophecy has not ceased, we still shall not accept anything from a false prophet.
2 Tim 3:14But you remain in the things which you have learned and have been assured of, knowing from whom you have learned them. 15From infancy, you have known the holy Scriptures which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith, which is in Christ Jesus. 16Every Scripture is God-breathed and profitable for teaching, for reproof
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 5, 2012 at 1:01pmfor correction, and for instruction in righteousness, 17that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.
This isn’t telling me to wait for future revelation, this speaks of “remaining” in that which we already have. There was no reason for a “restoration” because nothing was lost. Yet Smith tossed the Bible out and wrote his own version, and uttered false prophecies along the way. I mean, helloooo, what don’t you get about that?
As for the gotquestions link, you said: “they take simple truths and induce grand conclusions, the use circular logic to assert that their conclusions were what the verses actually said ”
That’s just a bald assertion, with no examples.
“We do believe that while the Bible is the result of a valiant attempt by many to preserve the writings and sayings of the early Apostles and Jesus, that not all of those writings and teaching were successfully preserved.”
I know. That’s what I call inducing grand conclusions and circular logic. In fact, there is enough historical and archeological evidence for me to state emphatically that there is absolutely NO reason to believe this. This is what you have been told to believe, and it is simply not true. Where is your evidence?
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 5, 2012 at 1:02pm“Prophets are NOT infallible even though you insist they be.”
What about Deut 13? Shall we just rip those pages out of the Bible and forget that Smith lied and said it was God speaking when it was not? Where is the accountability? LDS are accountable only to themselves and only when it’s convenient. Sheesh.
“We also believe that incorrect, subjective, prejudicial and selective opinions of later church fathers led to rejecting/restating valid scriptural material when they couldn’t harmonize them with their flawed interpretations and exegesis.”
So the church fathers, who lived and spoke with the Apostles themselves, cannot be believed? But Joseph Smith, who shows up 1800 years later and proves himself to be a false prophet, should be believed?
Again, history and archeology do not support your argument, and I could go on and on with examples of why your theology simply cannot be true. For example. If Celestial Marriage is necessary, which temple did Jesus get married in?
Report this comment
theotherberean
Nov. 5, 2012 at 1:03pm“All of the apologetics you provided on the Trinity creeds honestly admit that the creeds are incomprehensible. But then make the absurd claim that some truth cannot be comprehended. You chafe at LDS doctrine that doesn’t harmonize with your view, but then willingly swallow this camel. ”
Nice twist. No, the apologetics do not prove themselves wrong, they clearly prove that Jesus and the Father have the same attributes and therefore are both that same One God. They only admit that the notion of three persons existing in One God is incomprehensible to the finite human mind. I don’t “chafe” at LDS doctrine, you insist you are Christians so I’m merely exposing and rejecting heresy in the church as the Bible instructs me.
“The creeds openly assert that Man cannot know God in contradiction of Christ’s pronouncement that we are candidates for eternal life and that the essence of eternal life IS comprehending God.
ALL internally inconsistent and self-contradictory statements are false: it is false doctrines that cannot be comprehended.”
Where do the creeds contradict the Bible? LoL And the Bible doesn’t ask you to comprehend the doctrine of the Trinity. The creeds merely state that they are self evident in the Scriptures. Tell me which internally inconsistent and self-contradictory statements make it a false doctrine and we’ll discuss them.
Report this comment
Twinspeedr
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:13amDawkins does not always execute the best judgement. He is a failing atheist-turned-agnostic-turned-??? He constantly having to reassure himself that there is not God. Will his ego overcome the truth once he understands it? Let’s pray it does not, and hope that he accepts God before he dies.
Report this comment
drattastic
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:10amI don’t see any problems here .
Report this comment
Gonzo
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:27amDitto.
Report this comment
THERAPTURCOMES
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:08amWhat a joke, mormonism on any level is a cult and if running for the office does not somehow negate the fact he is a mormon and a teacher of that satanic church.
Report this comment
The citizen who cares
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:35amIs that what your minister told your congregation to make sure they don’t convert to the LDS faith?
Report this comment
RobertSailing
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:49am@THERAPTURCOMES
I bet your mom is proud of you.
Report this comment
bamadadof3
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:18amSatan would never promote the teachings of the Mormon church you idiot! My church teaches against Satan and shows us how to stay away from and reject his lies. To say my church is lead by Satan may be the absolute dumbest statement I have ever seen written in any blog ever.
Report this comment
Captain0bvious
Nov. 2, 2012 at 1:45pm@therapturecomes, aren’t you supposed to be out protesting a military funeral somewhere?
Report this comment
THERAPTURCOMES
Nov. 2, 2012 at 2:30pmCAPTAIN
I have nothing to do with people that are doing such things
Report this comment
bhelmet
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:04amNever heard the Missouri thing before, but I still have NO problems with Mormons. He is still a decent, honorable man.
Report this comment
tess q
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:58amagree! their belief about missouri explains their deep belief that this country is exceptional. we need that kind of belief right now.
Report this comment
Ilikepeople
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:03amEveryone give Richard Dawkins a round of applause, because he’s helping to chase people back into religion. Thank you Richard, I can always count on your Atheist brothers to be the backstop to keep people from sliding. Thanks for the bump.
Report this comment
COFemale
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:02amDawkin’s knows nothing about the Bible except what he has put in his demented mind. He is a shill for Satan and why would we care what this douche bag says?
I also think Romney knows a bit more about Mormonism than Dawkin’s also. Ignore Dawkins.
Report this comment
God_Is_Not
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:48amThe only thing anyone can know is what is in their mind. Strange comment.
Dawkins also never claimed to know more about mormonism than Romney. Straw man.
Report this comment
TheCalmOne
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:03pmI think you’ll find that Richard Dawkins knows a great deal about the Bible; probably far more than you do. Have you read any of his books?
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Nov. 2, 2012 at 9:58amDawkins proves the old adage of “Open mouth and remove all doubt to being known as a fool.’
Report this comment
Ilikepeople
Nov. 2, 2012 at 9:56amMormons shouldn’t call themselves a church of Saints, you just shouldn’t. Does a father call himself the father? No, it’s the children who decide who the father is, and isn’t.
Report this comment
COFemale
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:04amUm I call myself a mother, why wouldn’t a father refer to himself as a father. Your argue holds not water. Plus I don’t feel you have any ground to talk Mormonism either. You probably believe all that misinformation you read on Wikipedia or other atheist sites.
Next.
Report this comment
PGMike
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:31am@ILike,
The New Testament often refers to those who believe in Christ as “saints” little “s”. For a Mormon the word “saint” is interchangeable with believer. You may be confusing our practice of calling ourselves “saints” or “believers” with the Catholic practice of honoring “Saints” big “S”. For Catholics, a “Saint” is a special designation reserved for those who have extra ordinary faith and or who have lived extra ordinary lives. For us, “saint” is an everyday term. If you wish to learn more about our beliefs go to lds.org
Report this comment
toiletclogga
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:51am@ PGMike, I don’t understand the heavy handedness of the atheists when it comes to Mormons. I am not a Mormon, but an Evangelical Christian. I served in the military with many Mormons most of whom were honorable and decent people with strong moral conviction. I just don’t understand why the Libs seem to believe calling Romney out on his faith is bad thing. The only bad Mormon I’ve come across is Harry Reid.
Report this comment
born2fly
Nov. 2, 2012 at 7:16pmWhy not? The followers of Christ in the days of the apostles called themselves saints. Check your New Testament. I did a quick word search just now and found 62 references – mostly as salutations from Paul. I’m afraid history and Catholic tradition has changed our understanding of what the word saint means.
Report this comment
toiletclogga
Nov. 2, 2012 at 9:55amThe economy, the economy, the economy. I don’t care if the next President is Mormon, Hindu, or Muslim. It does not matter. What matters is that the next President is concerned about turning around our economy, and creating jobs for Americans! Faith is great, and adherence to faith is also great. This election is about the economy! End of story!
Report this comment
hi
Nov. 2, 2012 at 9:59amI agree. We can talk about National Security too since Obama is incompetent and puts the US in a dangerous spot.
Report this comment
justangry
Nov. 2, 2012 at 10:52amI don’t think Romney or any other Keynesian will do squat for the economy.
Report this comment
toiletclogga
Nov. 2, 2012 at 11:41amI guess you’re going to have to wait and see. Let’s hope your crystal ball is broken!
Report this comment
justangry
Nov. 2, 2012 at 8:06pmCrystal ball? This is by design. http://keynesatharvard.org/book/KeynesatHarvard-ch10.html
I know you’re not a fan of Libertarians, but you still should check it out. After doing so, why would you suppose someone would support such nonsense? The only reasons I can think of is they’re incompetent, totally corrupt or intentionally trying to sabotage our economy. Either way such men shouldn’t be in charge.
Report this comment