Watch Live: Congressional Hearing on IRS Scandal
Live BlazeCast at 2pm ET: All the fireworks from the IRS Hearing!
Liberal Actor John Cusack to Play Rush Limbaugh in New Film He’s Developing

Conservative commentator Rush Limbaugh speaks during a secretive ceremony inducting him into the Hall of Famous Missourians on Monday, May 14, 2012, in the state Capitol in Jefferson City, Mo. Credit: AP
In addition to his acting abilities, John Cusack has become known for his progressive worldview and a penchant for arguing with conservatives (especially on Twitter). Now, the entertainer is ready to take his political antics to the big screen, as he is developing a film about radio host Rush Limbaugh.
Cusack’s company, New Crime Productions, announced the new project (working title: “Rush”) on Friday. Currently, the script is being refined, production is set for next year and Emmy Award-winning director Betty Thomas is already on board. Thomas, no stranger to bringing the lives of controversial radio hosts to the big screen, directed the 1997 biopic “Private Parts,” a film about shock jock Howard Stern.
Limbaugh is among the nation’s most popular, provocative and intriguing media figures. Earlier this year, he caught the ire of critics when he called Sandra Fluke, a Georgetown law student, a “slut” and a “prostitute” on air after she argued to Democrats in Congress that health plans should pay for contraception. He’s also been an avid critic of President Barack Obama.
According to the Associated Press, a publicist for Limbaugh said Friday he would check with the host for comment; so far, nothing has been released. Additionally, the agency representing Cusack, Creative Artists Agency, declined to speak out in detail about the project.
Judging from the actor’s past comments, statements and political activism, one wonders how Cusack will portray the controversial radio host. These elements considered, a positive portrayal is hard to imagine (however, it’s quite possible that the actor will be fair in his framing of Limbaugh). At this point, with little information about the script available, it’s difficult to definitively assess the film’s purpose and intentions.

John Cusack attends the GQ Men of the Year Award at the Komische Oper on October 26, 2012 in Berlin, Germany. Credit: Getty Images for GQ
Despite his left-of-center views, Cusack has also been critical of President Barack Obama. While he attended Obama’s inauguration in 2008, he has taken aim at the president’s military decisions and his policies pertaining to civil liberties. In a Tweet on Friday, the actor commented about Hurricane Sandy, writing, “I’m no fan of president — but in GOP world — do we really want a privatized fire department?”
One final note: In reporting this story on Friday evening, the AP published some curious lines, describing Cusack and Limbaugh’s body types, highlighting the obvious differences and pondering how makeup artists will handle the depiction. Considering past on-screen transformations — and the astounding abilities that Hollywood has to mold actors into fascinating characters — this inclusion seemed odd.
The wire service wrote, “Cusack as Limbaugh isn’t typecasting, politics aside. Cusack is a slender, dark-haired 46-year-old, while Limbaugh is 61, balding and portly. But Hollywood’s makeup experts have probably had greater challenges.” It’s noteworthy that the AP wrote “politics aside,” yet went into a descriptive meandering that was, more likely than not, unneeded.
In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.














































































































Comments (126)
UseTP2wipe
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 3:51pmThis should be great! I really love John Cusack’s acting and his views. Rush could be portrayed as a slimy, bigoted, hateful, bigot, but that’s not a Hollywood portrayal, that’s real life. Wonder if the movie will delve into his failed relationships with women? Four times this staunch “family values” pig has been married, so far, yet he’s “A-ok” with the religious right. Makes sense.
Report this comment
kalli
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 4:14pmRush, the man with more intelligence than you and the entire ship of leftwing progressive a**wipes together, could teach you a lot about love of country and liberty, and the high price paid to achieve them. Attacking Rush is like attacking Romney…it’s not an agenda to run on.
Report this comment
skippy6
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 4:16pmI don’t trust you sir I’ll just wave, thank you…….
Report this comment
taksavillage
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 4:40pmA lib attacking Rush for values is like a **** eating dog telling someone his breath stinks.
Report this comment
realindependent
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 5:33pmAmen Limbaugh is a joke and he is wrong 99.7% of the time behind his golden microphone.
Report this comment
charliegirl4u
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 5:45pmUncool dude!!… ;(
Report this comment
Gonzo
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 5:53pmSo, he’s a ‘bigoted bigot’? As opposed to an open minded bigot? Genius, LOL.
Report this comment
000degrees
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 6:00pm2wipe….bigoted bigot?????? get your thoughts together man……You’re thinking with your estrogen….
Report this comment
pissantno.10
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 6:15pmuse to wipe lose your goverment money for toilet paper . or is it just to much work to clean your self after unloading your brains
Report this comment
GerriDavid
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 6:23pmrealindependant…..Just how much do you actually listen to Rush? Or are you like most liberals and just go by what you are told by other liberals? You have to tell us just one time that Rush was wrong…..
usetp2wipe….So Rush has been married 4 times….so what does that matter? At least half of Hollywood has been married more than once and nobody cares. Maybe because they are Liberals and Rush is not.
Report this comment
horsehockey
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 7:39pmHey, *sswipe, Rush really knows how to stick it to you lefties; and, Cusack a hasbeen that never was.
Report this comment
GPS-Tech
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 8:02pmJohn Cusack has always been a douche and always will be. His greatest achievement to date is the mega flop 2012 and that was a real piece of crap.
Report this comment
GPS-Tech
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 8:05pm@ U SIT 2 P
Go troll on the huffpo comments section with rest of the sell outs, mentally ill and weak of mind left wing losers.
Report this comment
UseTP2wipe
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 9:20pmGerridavid: Here’s the problem with your Hollywood analogy: people in Hollywood don’t condemn others for their personal foibles like Rush and the religious right do. That’s called being a hypocrite, and the right is great at that.
Report this comment
jstan442
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 9:26pmat least he marries the women–fluke just sleeps with anyone she can(and that is the meaning of ‘slut’)
Report this comment
Hanner
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 9:27pm@TAKSAVILLAGE– can’t quit laughing!!!
Report this comment
fmadsen
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 10:43pmRush doesn’t claim to be a perfect human being and I don’t defend his failings. He is a very talented talk show host and will readily admit his imperfections. So you think he is any less perfect than John Kennedy, Bill Clinton, Gary Hart, Anthony Weiner, Barney Frank, John Edward, and more…..You worship at the alter of these Democrats and never speak badly of them. Oh yeah, then there was Teddy Kennedy. More women died in the backseat of his car than at the ’3 Mile Island’ nuclear plant disaster. You’re a hypocrite.
Report this comment
PATTY HENRY
Posted on November 4, 2012 at 1:27amWHO LET THE DOGS OUT??!! Cusack is a talented albeit totally nutzoid Actor who has probably the worst record of SCRIPT CHOICE in HOLLYWOOD. I think he could have been at the very top of his field had his films been of more quality and here he goes again. No doubt other members of his talented family will show up in the film.
Having said that I’m with KALLI…maybe he’ll learn something. RUSH, unlike wishy-washy O’Reilly types or Manic Hannity types, really informs people. His audience is not going to be swayed in the least by any negative portrayal which would have to include lies. THE SPONSORS who dropped him over the FLUKE remarks tried desperately to get back on board (he said no way Jose). THANK GOD for RUSH. Every generation needs a TOTAL TRUTH TELLER. BECK is that for me. Beck adds enough levity to keep people from feeling suicidal with the lousy news under that FREAK OBAMA’S Watch being as bad as it is.
SPEAKING of the OBAMA FREAK: I notice that we have a NEW BATCH of trolls on board this weekend. I’m sure they are pulling out all the stops to try to dissuade us…everything from from BLACKS are going to ATTACK you if OBAMA Looses (yeah, right…that makes us want Obama at the helm) to every lie about MITT they can think of. Just like their dopy Stimulus package… we sat here and watch the DNC et al BLOW 1 B dollars which turned to dust that first debate. Start packin’ boys your turn is up.
Report this comment
leroi
Posted on November 4, 2012 at 4:25amAre you serious, you butt wipe, you want to talk about a PRIVATE Citizanes married life, but you don’t seem to want to talk about Clintons, or lets try Kennedy”s, we will add the butt head on tweeteer from New York, Oma’s husband, and lets not leave Elliot # 9 out. At Least Rush marries them, as opposed to leaving them at the bottom if a river. Bring it on you POS’S !
Report this comment
leroi
Posted on November 4, 2012 at 4:46amI Want One of you F**#@! wds . Your side tends to leave women dead, or so ruined there is no coming back, remember Monica? Lewinsky was her name. Marilyn, Monroe was her name, Mary Joe, Kopeckni was her name. You female groupies on the left make me sick, you don’t care about women being empowered, you all on the left just want to get jiggy with the guy in power, and that guy cares no more for you than he does the black community, or the jewish community, or the female community. All you are is bought and paid for hoes, at the tax payers expence, you make me sick
Report this comment
lordamercy
Posted on November 4, 2012 at 7:31amTroll!!
Report this comment
RobbieTLHughie
Posted on November 5, 2012 at 11:13amCusack, a multi-millionaire who has had more top-grossing movies than you, I assume – is a has been? Hahahahaha, you people are such geeks. You make up crap to insult people you don’t like, it’s effin’ hilarious.
Report this comment
LeadNotFollow
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 3:37pm.
John Cusack’s acting has really sucked for a long time now.
He’s not talented enough to convincingly play Rush Limbaugh.
Cusack will probably gain weight in order to play the role of Rush.
We can only hope, that after the filming, he won’t be able to lose the weight, and he ends up living the rest of his life looking like Chris Christie.
Karma!
Report this comment
Exrepublisheep
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 3:45pmooooff…
Report this comment
Chinishque
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 4:30pmWhats he gonna do…stand out in the yard with a radio playing Rush’s voice?
Report this comment
Tankertony
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 3:37pmAnd nobody will go to see the film, except leftist hacks…
Report this comment
FieldJudge
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 3:35pmA close acquaintance of mine dated Cusack years ago. She said the guy was polite and intelligent but not very smart. Based on his screwy Leftist tweets and this Rush movie story he’s still not very smart.
Report this comment
FREEDOMSTANCE
Posted on November 4, 2012 at 11:22amI’ve got some friends of mine who are incredibly nice people. But when it comes down to politics they don’t do a lick of fact checking. They just say they have always voted democratic and will continue to do so. I would argue that to be more stubborn than stupid. But, alas, in this day and time, deciding to be stubborn about the scary facts of today’s left…yeah…thats just downright idiotic. Btw love the profile pic. His ship is indeed to sinking fast!
Report this comment
TROONORTH
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 3:17pm“however, it’s quite possible that the actor will be fair in his framing of Limbaugh”
I think that the active term here is “framing”.
Let’s hope he puts a lot of liberal money into it and subsequently loses his shirt when he finds that movies full of left wing screed are not big box office except in election years. And Rush will have a ball with it of course.
Report this comment
Gonzo
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 3:16pmMy banned list is getting very long, good thing I enjoy reading. I WAS a fan of Last Man Standing with Tim Allen…until last night.
Report this comment
momrules
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 3:35pmI watched it for the last time last night too. A shame.
Report this comment
Chinishque
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 4:33pmGonzo, Didn’t see it…watching Bonanza on Netflicks… what happened?
Report this comment
Gonzo
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 5:50pmIt was all about the election, It had a decidedly liberal slant. Allen’s character lost all the arguments with the ‘oh so intelligent’ youth in the family. You could tell libs wrote it because he didn’t use facts to back up his statements and they made him look like a buffoon. It was too much to take.
Report this comment
mercenary4freedom
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 8:43pmAll those network shows are liberal garbage
Report this comment
Come_and_take_it
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 9:19pmThe show was so funny last season. Why they chose to mess with it, I will never know.
Report this comment
spinelessdave
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 3:10pmOne title says it all ” The Grifters “
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 3:04pmI have seen a few films where I did like the way Cusack. But, to once again steal a term that I read here some time ago, looks to me like he is about to shoot himself in the clown shoes with movie.
Report this comment
Grace1798
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 2:54pmThis actor just ruined his career.
Report this comment
TulsaYeeHaw
Posted on November 4, 2012 at 1:24amWhat career?
Report this comment
N37BU6
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 2:48pmWell, this will be a massive failure… one full of mischaracterization, misinformation, misinterpretation, and John Cusack.
Report this comment
Gonzo
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 3:34pmHe’ll win an Academy Award for it. You know how Hollywood works.
Report this comment
MODEL82A1
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 2:47pm“(H)owever, it’s quite possible that the actor will be fair in his framing of Limbaugh” Really?
What evidence exists to support this wild conjecture? When has ANY Liberal EVER been “fair”, or even Honest, when talking about Rush? There is Zero chance of it happening for the first time with this film.
Report this comment
The-Monk
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 2:46pmI wonder if they need permission from Rush to make a movie about him?
Report this comment
CatB
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 3:10pmHi MONK
Nope public figure .. but if it were a progressive they would find some way to try to shut it down .. like they did the movie about the Kennedy’s that they didn’t like. It got moved to another network.
Report this comment
yiska8
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 2:46pmAnother Sarah Palin portrayal-esque film where it will heralded and awards given. Liberal on liberal love fests and hateful award shows.
“And the Golden Globe for best actor in an original film goes to John Cusack!!! For his gritty portrayal of controversial radio talk show host,Rush Limbaugh.
Congratulations, John!!! Hugs and kisses from the presenter, (a liberal casting couch starlet), and then onto the speech where he says he wanted to bring to light the hatred and venom spewed over the airwaves and why we should implement the “Fairness Doctrine”.
I can see, hear, and smell the stench already.
I like Cusack so much better in the 1980′s. Just shut up, and make us laugh Cusack! Entertain us. and collect your paycheck.
Rush Limbaugh cannot be portrayed believably by a skinny,whiny, liberal man who refuses to grow up.
Report this comment
338lapua
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 2:44pmYou know what…….this IS a (somewhat) free country. Cusack can spend his money any way his heart desires. God bless him. He will most likely portray Rush in a less than positive light (big shock). Probably won’t go over well, he will look like an idiot and lose money. On the plus side,the money gets spent. That is a plus for those who receive a paycheck. I bet Rush gets oodles of material from every episode. And in three more days, progressivism/liberalism will be carried out to the dumpster of history…….where it has belonged for many, many years.
Raise a glass(AFTER YOU VOTE)!
Report this comment
tuffterf
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 9:48pm“He will most probably portray Rush in a less than positive light “, Is it possible to portray him in a positive light? One of the biggest a-holes on earth.
Report this comment
kalli
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 2:44pmWooohooo! In the making, another brainless liberal waste of money from hollyweird. These people should be banned from making their senseless filth! The last time I wasted money to see a movie at a theatre was the early 90′s, and since, waited for the good clean ones to come to TV. Now, good and clean are dirty words in hollyweird.
Report this comment
alias.stone
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 2:35pmCusack who has no love for conservatives unless he can make a buck portraying them. Typical Hollywood.
Report this comment
Chinishque
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 4:36pmI love this idea! Liberals ******* away their money on something nobody will ever care to see. I hope he throws everything he owns into making this “film”.
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 2:32pmIsn’t this just lovely: a Hollywood version of the Democrat Character Assassination Squad. Oh, joy. Anyone else getting sick of the Lefty smears? Disgusting. I used to enjoy going to the movies. No longer. Now I feel like I have to investigate the producers, etc. to see where my money is headed. NOBAMA 2012
Report this comment
momrules
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 2:47pmSame here Barber. I refuse to allow certain television shows into my home for the same reason. If a celebrity/director/producer chooses to trash me and my values I will not give them any of my money. Let the liberals support them, not me.
Report this comment
mercenary4freedom
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 9:03pmThe Chicoms just completed the purchase of AMC Theaters in Sept for $2.6 billion.
http://news.yahoo.com/chinese-company-wanda-completes-buy-amc-theaters-180522574–finance.html
Report this comment
Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 2:31pmRemember that’s spelled R-U-S-H. Limbaugh will laugh all the way to the bank.
Report this comment
DadRocked
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 4:05pmThat’s America ! People may say different but we ALL watch out for outselves. Capilism? Call it what you may…
Report this comment
DadRocked
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 2:26pmCusack as RUSH? “Controversial radio host” What’s controversial about him? If you’re like me I speak my mind. Rush does too! If this country got back to speaking their mind then NO ONE would wonder what where up to. It sucks because that was what we did ‘in the day’. We need to take the U.S.Senate too to get OUR county back to what we truly believe in. VOTE FOLKS and take everybody to the polls this Tuesday! A LANDSLINDE will STOP any conflicts. We need to get the vote out. Dad’s Son aka DadRocked
Report this comment
jackact
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 2:41pm@DadRock
Well said.
Report this comment
Ilikepeople
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 2:26pmIs that like Carroll O’connor playing Archie Bunker? Or at least that’s how they are trying to make Rush Limbaugh seem. They do lump Limbaugh, and Archie Bunker in the same category.
Report this comment
Mojoron
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 2:26pmHey I got a problem with Cusak: he’s too cute, he’s too skinny and he doesn’t have a brain.
Report this comment
CatB
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 2:44pmYup .. other than that he would be perfect…. oh well .. just something else I won’t watch, or waste my time or money on.
Report this comment
ron2win
Posted on November 4, 2012 at 3:42amHe obviously doesn’t have enough brains to tie half of it behind his back ,like rush does when talking to a liberal !
Report this comment
jackact
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 2:22pmGone are the days when Hollywood crafted quality biopics.
‘The Queen’ and ‘The Kings Speech’ were exceptions, as was ‘Ghandi’.
Those were all UK financed and produced films.
Big hopes for ‘Lincoln’ but otherwise this one will end up on the shelf next to most American biopics of the past 30 years.
Resigned to the dustbin of biased political trash that Hollywood still shamlessly craps.
Stay home
For the $12 bucks you could purchase a subscription to ‘The Limbaugh Newletter’
And learn something.
Report this comment
DadRocked
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 2:29pmDo Not Lose The Faith! It used to be is what MOST of us still believe in!
Report this comment
Fonz777
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 2:20pmSo take heart liberals – a “screen in a box” is on it way with a ticket full of lies, liars and mischaracterizations!
Report this comment
momrules
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 2:18pmRush will love this. He will laugh for days at Cusak’s effort to smear him and I don’t doubt for a minute that that won’t be the whole premise of the movie. A smear job. One great big liberal smash and grab.
Report this comment
Chinishque
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 4:40pmMore like …smash and lose. There is no way Johnny boy will make money on this thing…unless Soros or another big lib is paying him in the backside…
Report this comment
honor007
Posted on November 3, 2012 at 2:17pmHollywood bites. Really? A movie about Rush? don’t get me wrong, I like Rush….but, really??????
have they no original ideas for good movies anymore??? I’ve seen one movie in the Theaters in 3 years, thanks Dinesh.
Report this comment