If you plan on seeing “The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey” and wonder why the filmography might look a little off, your eyes aren’t playing tricks on you.

(Image: The Hobbit)
The Warner Bros. film was shot in high frame rate (HFR) 3D — 48 frames per second, which is twice the current standard — and will be shown in 450 theaters in this format. The Los Angeles Times’ Ben Fritz wrote that the technology is intended to produce a “hyper-realistic image.” Gizmodo’s Andrew Leszewski wrote that it will look like a “TV soap opera.”
Regal Theaters issued a memo about the HFR technology and the differences that movie-goers should expect. It states that the HFR will be “closer to what the human eye actually sees.”

(Image: Regal Theaters)
The HFR 3D version of the film will require the same type of glasses used for traditional 3D movies.
Fritz noted in the L.A. Times that the format has gotten relatively negative reviews after it was shown at the CinemaCon convention in April. In May, Engadget reported director Peter Jackson saying it will be an adjustment for audiences.
“It does take you a while to get used to,” Jackson said.
In its post, Engadget showed two videos to give you a sense of the difference between 25 fps and 50 fps. See if you can tell the difference in the videos here.
This video from Christie, a visual technology company, explains more about HFR:
The movie will also be shown in the traditional 24-fps format. Still, high frame rate seems to be where more directors are heading toward. The memo from Regal states that the other films in The Hobbit series will be shot in the high-tech format and that director James Cameron plans on using it for projects as well.
The Hobbit opens Dec. 14 in the United States. Tickets went on sale Wednesday.
Here’s a trailer for the movie, which is not seen in HFR:
Related:





















































































































Comments (102)
CatherineMcClarey
Nov. 8, 2012 at 3:37pmI try to avoid 24fps 3D movies, because they give me headaches & eyestrain, and the 3D glasses don’t usually fit very well over prescription eyeglasses. I know my whole family is planning to watch “The Hobbit” when it comes out in December, but we’ll probably opt for a 2D showing. (Wouldn’t mind trying 48fps 3D once, though.)
Report this comment
RRFlyer
Nov. 9, 2012 at 9:35amThat was a nice thought circle
Report this comment
blair152
Nov. 8, 2012 at 2:20pmLooks good. I can’t wait for the DVD.
Report this comment
WiscPatriotUSA
Nov. 8, 2012 at 2:05pmThis is similar to the effect you get when you watch a tv show or movie on a Samsung HD tv with the picture set to 120HZ High mode. It makes tv shows and commercials look like they were shot with a camcorder and normal lighting like a home movie. It is very disconcerting and you lose the ability to “lose yourself” in the story or moment–which is the magic of movies. I, for one, will not enjoy this effect at all. The magic is gone when you are constantly thinking, “That picture doesn’t look right”. This mode is great for real life events–ideally for sports–where it is more like being their live. For fantasy works like movies it will be a huge turn-off.
Report this comment
RedheadedStepchild
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:29pmCouldn’t have said it better myself! Thanks, it is so true.
Report this comment
ss1129
Nov. 9, 2012 at 12:53amWhat he said.
Report this comment
Melomel
Nov. 9, 2012 at 5:56pmBingo!!! I watch everything in 60hz at home and avoid 3D movies.
In fact, I try to avoid movie theaters period. This one looks like it will be worth the ticket price though.
Report this comment
XYZOptics
Nov. 8, 2012 at 1:56pmPeter Jackson shot the film on the RED Epic at 5K resolution. He had 20 cameras on any given shot using 3D rigs.
Report this comment
ItsNotThatDifficult
Nov. 8, 2012 at 1:52pmBy the way, if God is going to end this crazy world, soon, he’d better let me see this trilogy first. That gives us until mid 2014.
Report this comment
Exrepublisheep
Nov. 8, 2012 at 2:19pmI agree.
Report this comment
shandog
Nov. 8, 2012 at 6:36pmMe too!
Report this comment
Stoneez
Nov. 8, 2012 at 6:56pmI’m sure He cares
Report this comment
wvernon1981
Nov. 8, 2012 at 7:05pmI used to worry that God would come before I got to see certain movies when I was young. Fortunately, I don’t worry about that anymore since I gave God up.
Report this comment
Madriky
Nov. 8, 2012 at 9:20pm“… thus ends the third age of Middle Earth and the Eldar sail to The Grey Havens…” The orcs and goblins take over rule of Mordor, D.C. under the With King of Angmar (he hails from Indonesia or Kenya)
Report this comment
FaithfulFriend
Nov. 8, 2012 at 1:48pmFinally, I can scratch the 48fps off my global wish list.
Next item on the list is to see 20% more of the population to become self sufficient producers instead of takers.
Report this comment
Shasta
Nov. 8, 2012 at 2:15pmNext on my list is this country protecting the unborn, not that has anything to do with frame rates.
Report this comment
PaulMckenzie94
Nov. 8, 2012 at 1:45pmAnyone else notice the apple sign at the bottom right? Is apple funding this movie or what?
Report this comment
SteveSD
Nov. 8, 2012 at 2:14pmIt’s a QuickTime clip.
Report this comment
Madriky
Nov. 8, 2012 at 9:06pmIs it just me, or do the dwarves look more like kilngons more than dwarves described in Tolkien’s book?
Report this comment
TransmitToVladmir
Nov. 10, 2012 at 4:04amMadriky – “do the dwarves look more like kilngons more than dwarves described in Tolkien’s book?”
Unfortunately, “Peter Jackson’s The LORD OF THE RINGS movies” (that is the way he wants it known) have always been a Jackson stew of Tolkien bits.
In one anecdote, Jackson related how he had painted himself into a story-corner and couldn’t get a scene to work. Then he went back to the books and found out that it worked the way Tolkien wrote it … and so filmed it that way. Too bad, but the definitive TLOTR has yet to be made (and I think world events will guarantee that mankind has flubbed that one, too).
Report this comment
ItsNotThatDifficult
Nov. 8, 2012 at 1:42pmProblem is, most theaters are leery about switching to the format. I was really hoping to see the new frame rate, actually. The look of 120 hz vs. 60 hz is strange to get used to, but it’s better in the long run.
Report this comment
grimjack3791
Nov. 8, 2012 at 1:35pmSpecial guest star: Jay Carney as Gollum.
Report this comment
SistaTriscuit
Nov. 8, 2012 at 4:52pmLMAO! You made me laugh out loud.
Report this comment
Madriky
Nov. 8, 2012 at 9:35pmAnd Barak Obama playing Smaug, the Dragon.
Report this comment
vntnrse
Nov. 9, 2012 at 8:35amYou owe me a new keyboard! I just shot milk out of my nose laughing so hard!!!
Report this comment
Frederick_Douglass_Republican
Nov. 8, 2012 at 12:38pmDo I care about this now? No. I couldn’t possibly care less. Let them sit around doing bong hits waiting for their chance to vote for the destroyer again in 2016. He will run again. By then there will be 150,000,000 using EBT cards. Who’s going to stop him?
Report this comment
BrayDeck
Nov. 8, 2012 at 1:17pmJust because Obama won doesn’t mean that we should all give up on life and plot revolution. The Hobbit is a brilliant story written by Tolkien, a brilliant man, which is being interpreted by Peter Jackson, a fantastic director. This is the kind of movie we should pay to go see. It’s the story of a seemingly insignificant peasant who rises up against great evil in the form of the dragon Smaug and becomes a hero. It’s a celebration of the triumph of good vs evil.
Remember the words of Yoda, (Pat Gray voice) “Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering.” Don’t fear the government. That will only cement their victory.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Nov. 8, 2012 at 1:39pmBraydeck,
But I do fear the government. They can take your stuff. Most people would consider 10% to the government to be fair. They can raise your taxes however high they want. If you try to save for a rainy day, they can tax you enough that you have to “need” then.
They can ban guns. The had a partial ban during the Clinton administration. They way Diane Feinstein picked her criteria on which guns to ban was risible.
They can teach falsehoods in the school. In Sweden the try to ban homeschooling. Liberals here want to be like Sweden or the other perfect Nordic countries. I read a lot about them & I see a lot of cracks in that supposedly perfect edifice.
Government forces us to have open borders thru malignant neglect.
They are more than knee deep into health care. We are going to have dual system of health care now like socialist France. One for the rich & upper government poobahs & one for everyone else.
the rich get more now, but the healthcare system is more graduated.
Report this comment
dndcrazy
Nov. 8, 2012 at 1:43pmRelax and take a deep breath. Don’t let it bring you down. I was upset the first night but now I’m back to living my life. Do I still get mad at the person in front of me at the store that is dressed better than me, talking on a new cell phone, and paying with a food stamp card? Hell yes I do. My wife and I have five kids and we struggle pay check to pay check. But I am proud that we don’t take a dime from anyone. Keep strong man. A year from now those that voted for Obama will really see the effect. There is no way to avoid the storm. Winter is coming
Report this comment
Commonzenze
Nov. 8, 2012 at 2:01pm@Braydeck – Hehe, a quote from Yoda.
Report this comment
Madriky
Nov. 8, 2012 at 9:09pmObama is Sauron. He now has the One Ring in Mordor, D.C. to rule them all and in the darkness bind them.
Report this comment
RavenGlenn
Nov. 8, 2012 at 12:20pmCloser to what the human eye actually sees? Call me when we have frame rates of several hundreds. For the longest time there was a myth running around that we could only see up to 30 frames per second, but that’s not even close to true. The general standard for PC gaming is around no less than 60. But, the higher, the better still. Many people are able to get upwards of 150 frames per second in some games.
Not even hitting 60 on the screen is yawn-worthy. There’s no reason that they cannot get a static film to hit higher frame rates. If video games(that render as you play them) can do it, it’s just laziness and cost management for them to not push films to a higher standard.
Report this comment
searcher619
Nov. 8, 2012 at 12:58pmActually for film/animation 30fp is the frame rate the human eye needs for the illusion of fluid motion as a general rule. Film can go below it and still appear fluid thanks to motion blur. If you watch a film running at say 18fps and pause on something moving fast you will catch blurred images. the blur fills in the missing images for your eyes and maintains the illusion of fluid motion. At 30fps there is less blurring. As for video games… fps over 30 act as buffers. Your video card can and does drop frames every now and then. Your eye doesn’t notice the dropped frames if you are getting more than 30 fps but your eye will notice it if you go below thanks to the lack of motion blur. the motion will appear jerky. 30fps is what you need for the illusion of fluid motion in games.
Report this comment
Metallicat
Nov. 8, 2012 at 12:13pmI will always remember the first installment of Peter Jacksons LOTR trilogy echoing the anguish I felt after 9/11. the sequels did as well,but gave us hope that no matter how small we are,we can defeat great evil.
Report this comment
AAaaAA
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:49amIf the video game standard is 60 fps, with 30 fps being a secondary option. Even on the low end it’s still above the 24 fps of theaters. It would explain why I find theaters to be blurry messes.
Report this comment
Red Meat
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:43amWhy would I want to spend a hard earned and heavily taxed dime on Hollywood?
Report this comment
Edohiguma
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:51amPersonally I can only say: because I rather support WETA than ILM.
Report this comment
TEARS FOR AMERICA
Nov. 8, 2012 at 12:05pmEspecially when it is high time we give to patriotic causes…our world is going to hell and we are giving HOLLYWOOD money we gave our blood for…forget it! I am not supporting those liberal crazies any longer, AARP- go to hell- lefty business owners can do the same- Hollywood, you are finished. My hard earned money is going to causes I believe in.
Report this comment
mike551
Nov. 8, 2012 at 12:05pmNot one penny.
Report this comment
skurk
Nov. 8, 2012 at 2:15pmBecause, here at RED – we love everything American. And we have a Gadsden flag in our office…
So happy to see our products are liked by TheBlaze as well
Report this comment
Edohiguma
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:43amSo if you’re used to gaming at 60+ FPS it won’t really make a difference to you.
Personally I’m looking forward to it. Peter Jackson has done a marvelous job with LOTR, he should be doing fine with this one too. One of the things I love about his LOTR movies was that he didn’t use exclusively CGI. There were plenty of models in it, lots of old school tricks with camera perspective and angle, etc, something that most directors today can’t do anymore because it’s all CGI, which is utterly boring.
As for not supporting Hollywood. I agree, but this may be one of the few movies that are not turds, plus most of the staff involved, including the actors, aren’t even working in Hollywood. At least it was like that in LOTR, I doubt it has changed much. Yeah, NZ is pretty liberal, but I still rather give the money to NZ than to pure Hollywood.
Report this comment
XYZOptics
Nov. 8, 2012 at 1:52pmAgreed. Too bad the article didn’t even mention that the film was shot on a RED Epic camera at 5K resolution.
Report this comment
THX-1138
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:37amMay Hollywood get everything it so richly deserves.
Report this comment
mcmeador
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:36amHigh frame rates suck in movies. No one wants to feel like they’re on the set with the actors. They want to feel like they’re in another world, and the only way to convey that is with 24 fps that helps to disguise the imperfections of the set. If this is the way movies end up trending, I may stop watching movies altogether. I’ve already abandoned the theater due to their ridiculously high prices and anti-gun policies.
Report this comment
Edohiguma
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:49am30 FPS works just as fine. Higher frame rates shouldn’t be an issue. NTSC is 29.97 FPS, which, as far as I’ve seen, works fine with large productions. For example period dramas on Japanese TV filmed in 16:9 at 29.97 in 1080p look absolutely fantastic, significantly better than with older tech.
Heck, a jump to 48 FPS isn’t even that impressive. Let’s talk again when we hit 120 FPS.
Report this comment
Kaoscontrol
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:57amYou’re right. “Reality” isn’t nearly as interesting as when a taleted artist re-interprets what he/she sees and stylistically produces its likeness. Which is more compelling: the photograph of a person, or the richly layered oil painting by a Rembrant? 48fps takes away the beauty and abstract artifacts in a film that remind the movie goer that they are being told a dream like story, not reality.
Report this comment
Mole49er
Nov. 8, 2012 at 12:42pmcompletely agree
Report this comment
nowonuno
Nov. 8, 2012 at 1:13pmWell said re: frame rates. I always wonder why do we need to offer an alternative reality? Once they blur the lines, they will have full control. No thanks. Entertainment (barely these days) is just that. Reality is the ticket price.
Report this comment
GoodStuff
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:30amScrew Hollywood…they won’t get one more cent from me.
Report this comment
CatB
Nov. 8, 2012 at 12:07pmI agree ..
Report this comment
ResistSocialism
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:18amWhy would I pay Hollywood Obama lovers any money to see there movies? Nope
Report this comment
ResistSocialism
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:25amRedistribute their wealth… lol !
Report this comment
thegreatcarnac
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:09amI heard that a lot of the outdoor scenes were filmed in New Zealand. That is a pretty country…..too liberal….but beautiful scenery.
Report this comment
napoleon_solo
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:17amI believe that it was filmed almost exclusively in New Zealand.
Report this comment
ScreaminEagle
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:32amThey should take it there to make their money. I won’t pay to see it. Damn right I’ll boycott anything that supported Obummer.
Report this comment
CorpsmanToPA
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:35amAt least New Zealand has good protection of gun and property rights
Report this comment
libertarian34
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:38amNew Zealand is much freer than the United States…
http://www.heritage.org/index/
Report this comment
MMSands
Nov. 8, 2012 at 12:30pmThe film and TV industry works in New Zealand because the taxes are lower, they can pay lower wages, and it’s still possible to do business there. They can’t afford to film in the U.S. or Europe anymore. Not even in Australia. Follow the money. It’s all one ever has to do.
Report this comment
MMSands
Nov. 8, 2012 at 12:36pmThey can’t afford to film anywhere else these days. That’s why TV series and movies are done in New Zealand so often. Taxes and pay scales are way lower there.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Nov. 8, 2012 at 1:29pmMMSands
Doh! I figured it was because we import fresh material from England or Canada every now & then or that New Zealand was coming into its’ own.
Da/mn, the answer it so obvious. :(
Report this comment
kaydeebeau
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:07amWell, I am refusing to support the legacy media and practically everything Hollywood – I was pretty resolved before – after Tues – no more will I support that which destroys the culture and the ability of citizens to think critically
Report this comment
Walkabout
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:10amNo I really don’t want to support Hollywood. But I will choose a few movies & be very selective.
Hollywood will still hurt.
Report this comment
Mole49er
Nov. 8, 2012 at 12:44pmI used to go to the movies a lot about 10 years ago. Now I may go to 2 or 3 during the year. I really have to want to see one before I step foot in a theatre or even rent one on demand.
Report this comment
Cavallo
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:03amGizmodo’s Andrew Leszewski wrote that it will look like a “TV soap opera.”
So the more advanced the technology the worse it looks? Will this be The Blair Witch Project in Middle Earth, but with a 100 million dollar budget? Ugh.. Maybe the monster from Cloverfield can make an appearance.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:11amthe trailers for Cloverfield were so lame that as much of a fan of sci-fi & fantasy that I am I didn’t bother.
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:18amWALKABOUT, Have to agree with you there. I never even bothered when it came to tv either.
Report this comment
Cavallo
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:18amNor should you have (watched Cloverfield), unless you were looking for a headache. I had to take a break from the movie because I was so nauseous. Now the characters in The Blair Witch Project were supposedly film students, and it was still kinda jerky. Now imagine if the characters from the BWP were drunked half witted frat boys with a handicam.. You start to root for the monster to kill them quickly
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:35amLOL, CAVALLO, another movie that I avoided. Never understood the huge following. That filming quality, or lack of quality that you mentioned turned me off to it in the ads. Later, some of the people I knew who went nuts over it before it came out, wondered out loud about how stupid they were to have been separated from their hard earned money like that.
Report this comment
Cavallo
Nov. 8, 2012 at 3:31pmThere was a rumor and buzz that it was a secret new Godzilla movie.
Report this comment
jcldwl
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:02amWho cares?
Report this comment
Amica
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:19amYou apparently, at least enough to take the time to click on the story, read it (maybe), and scroll down to make a comment.
Report this comment
BenInNY
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:00amWell there goes that thought. Page auto-refreshed and my comment disappeared.
Basics: watched the comparison, 24fps looked good, higher frame rate looked completely unnatural.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:08amAuto refresh drives advertising & kills thought. State something without buttressing facts to support it & some will say it is not true. Buttress your argument with facts & auto-refresh kills your post.
Report this comment
BenInNY
Nov. 8, 2012 at 12:29pmOK, you lost me there. Had nothing to do with facts, just that while I was typing my comment the page auto-refreshed and so it was deleted. :P
Report this comment
goahead.makemyday
Nov. 8, 2012 at 1:19pmCopy every once in a while. I get annoyed with it too.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Nov. 8, 2012 at 1:31pmJust saying that if you write a paragraph or otherwise get wordy, the refresh gets you.
Report this comment
OhBrother
Nov. 8, 2012 at 6:50pmType your comments in Word and then paste it to the Comments Section. If more folks did this, they’d actually spell more correctly, too.
Report this comment
socialism.rocks
Nov. 8, 2012 at 10:43amthe best versions of the lord of the rings and hobbit is on youtube the full cartoon version of the movies made in the 70s and 80s
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:04amI followed those back as they came out. The first one suffered from it’s budget and allotted time. Many corners were cut to get it to market on time and resulted in an inferior product. Guess you weren’t around when the ads and bs on the talk shows circuit promised far more in quality that never came through. Literally from the first movie to the second the production format changed drastically, when one of the premier artists died. Frankly, I think the better versions have been the latest. The cartoons almost remind me of Jonathon Livingston Seagull. Another awful let down considering what was promised.
But, somebody did tie these scenes to Steppenwolf which in my opinion makes more sense.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0nXJGkLPRc
Report this comment
Walkabout
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:06amI thought the Battle of the 5 Armies was hand waved in the animated version. they just showed a bunch of dots & clouds of dust from a birds eye view.
But I’ll take any animated version or regular movie version that gets it on the map. As a fan of sci-fi & fantasy, you can’t complain too much about any screen adaption unless it kills the franchise because it was done so poorly.
Besides it is all soma/opiate & a relief from the f/ck-ups that run things.
Report this comment
Amica
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:13amOnly if you’re living in the past.
Report this comment
FaithfulCitizen
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:14amI remember the animated version of “The Hobbit” being mostly enjoyable (but a little odd in parts, e.g., the forest elves looked more like pointy-eared goblins). However, the Rankin/Bass “Lord of the Rings” was absolutely horrible – not even close to following the books! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Return_of_the_King_(1980_film)
Report this comment
Walkabout
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:21amI have both renditions of Frank Herbert’s Dune. I considered the the 2nd one almost sacraligeous in a secular sense when it came out. Now I like the 2nd version as well as the 1st. So my point is that I won’t denigrate the move because there is an animated version or vice versa. I would be happy to see both.
I’ll watch the Hobbit. I think it will be good. IMHO it will be better than the animated version I saw. What RJ said probably explains why I was disappointed with some of the animated version.
I just hope it is good. I remember the style that Starship troopers was made in. I some ways it was funny & in others I thought it killed the franchise. The sequel was schlock & horrible. I am surprised that they are remaking Starship Troopers.
Report this comment
Metallicat
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:22amI cant wait. Peter Jackson did a great job bringing Tolkien to the movie screen. I could even see some instances where he recreated scenes from the animated versions into his films. What beautiful work. He did Tolkien proud.
Report this comment
ImChiquita
Nov. 8, 2012 at 11:37amAnimated LOTR is available on DVD and Blu-ray. The extras for each varies, and that is why I own both.
Animated LOTR is just as powerful, and as close to the novel as Jackson’s trilogy is: meaning, there are some altered scenes (where the heck is Glorfindel??) but the dialogue sticks with the characters who spoke those lines. Jackson liked to give lines to various characters, because “Tolkien would’ve preferred it that way.”
That said, I enjoy both version. I really do. The intricate detail of costumes and sets live-LOTR, closer to the storyline in animated-LOTR – beautiful.
Report this comment