TheBlaze has brought you footage of some harrowing plane landings and fast cars, separately. But now there’s a combination of the two: a U-2 spy plane is seen coming in for a landing as its chased by a Chevy Camaro (more on why this is needed in a bit).
Check it out:
This video was taken by Airman 1st Class Andrew Buchanan at the Beale Air Force Base in California as part of the 9th Reconnaissance Wing. But why does the Air Force have some of the fastest cars chasing down U-2 spy planes? Turns out they’re not drag racing.

(Image: YouTube screenshot)
Chase cars, and the military pilots inside the cars (yes, inside the car too), provide an important function to help land this type of plane. The Air Force’s fact sheet on the U-2 explains:
A second U-2 pilot normally “chases” each landing in a high-performance vehicle, assisting the pilot by providing radio inputs for altitude and runway alignment. These characteristics combine to earn the U-2 a widely accepted title as the most difficult aircraft in the world to fly.
Carbuzz explains further the challenge for the pilot that requires instruction from a chase car to land the lightweight plane:
The car carries another trained U-2 pilot who guides the aviator in the plane’s cockpit when taking off (with “pogo” landing gear attached to the wings), but the trickiest part is the landing. Because of the plane’s unique design, the pilot (wearing an enclosed, helmeted flight suit similar to an astronaut’s that limits visibility) has to basically fly the aircraft at 140 mph just two feet off the ground, then cut the engine, deploy the flaps and essentially drop out of the sky. Once on the ground and at a full stop, the pilot drops one of the wingtips onto its titanium skid plate, the pogo wheels (which drop off after take-off) are reattached and the plane taxis off the runway.
Carbuzz goes on to state that the first chase cars were V-8 Ford station wagons, which were later surpassed by Ford Mustangs, the Camaro Z/28s and Pontiac GTos and G8s
(H/T: Jalopnik)






















































































































DadRocked
Nov. 16, 2012 at 12:02pmJP4JOY – Was going to post something but I figured… Why bother?
Ditto Head – So many Einsteins… So few problems solved.
Report this comment
DadRocked
Nov. 16, 2012 at 11:50amUSAF ‘Nam vet (’72-’78) – When I came back stateside, they sent me to Davis Monthan AFB (Tucson AZ). I worked the flightline and we had the U-2.
The U-2 used outrigger (pogos) wheels at the end of each wing while taxiing and taking off. Once the U-2 got enough speed, the wings developed lift, rose and then the pogos dropped off. Short take off then about a 50 degree ascent.
Upon landing they needed most of the flightline. Coming in for landing, there was an El Camino on each side of the flightline, both with a pole mounted/standing from the car’s bed. The bird came in, El Camino’s bolted. Touchdown had the wings resting on the poles. What a sight…
Best sight was right before the crack of dawn when the afterburners kicked in…
Ahhh Memories
Report this comment
DadRocked
Nov. 16, 2012 at 11:55amCorrect that to a 70º-80º angle of ascent
Report this comment
katpooh9
Nov. 15, 2012 at 9:09pmIt’s still not as exciting as standing at a certain point near the runway at Travis AFB watching the small speck of an approaching C-5 Galaxy seemingly hovering stationery in the sky. But eventually it gets closer and closer. The wheels come down and you begin to hear the scream of the engines. It grows giant as it continues its flight toward you and lowers and lowers, the speed seemingly too slow; its behemoth body magically staying aloft over the earth. The C-5 comes down so close over you that a basketball star may, just may, be able to jump and touch the fuselage or the wheels with his fingertips. The sky is completely blocked out. The screaming roar of the engines go through your head and body and the aircraft touches down on the other side of you. That was in the 1980’s while stationed at Travis AFB.
Report this comment
DadRocked
Nov. 16, 2012 at 11:52amAnother fantastic sight from the days in the Air Force my brother.
Report this comment
BOOGerRed
Nov. 14, 2012 at 3:12pmThey have Parachutes forOff-Runway landings. Plane and Pilot are expendable. It’s the Mission that counts.
Report this comment
DadRocked
Nov. 16, 2012 at 12:05pmBOOGerRed – All three are mission critical – And what do you mean by, “They have Parachutes forOff-Runway landings.” ? That doesn’t make any sense, can you clarify?
Report this comment
Nicholson William R
Nov. 14, 2012 at 2:30pmI never 2nd guessed the people whom designed and flew these works of art. Neither did I ever choose to denigrate others just to show my supposedly superior intellect. I just always had a profound awe and respect for these craft and the heroes that designed and flew them . They had all the numbers and facts to relate to the missions and design , as for me … I Thank God I Once Lived In The Proud United States ! Where we used to exceed the rest of the world as a matter of course , and didn’t get blamed by our monarchy for being wealthy or successful ! Ah , ancient history !
Report this comment
DeOppressoLiber
Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:08amKelly Johnsons Dragon Lady.
Whats the story about the test flights and the engineers at plane side doing some calculations and stating a couple of inches had to be removed in the rear trim around the exhaust. They wiped out hack saws cut it off and the test pilot took it up right after.
Report this comment
DZ-015
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:44amThere is a reason the 1950′s U-2 still flies, while the newer SR-71 now resides in various aviation museums. It can fly at an altitude most second and third tier fighters can’t reach, and it can do so with far more fuel economy. The long wings are not only required for high altitude cruising, but they also provide room for the massive fuel tanks necessary for long distance missions. They sag so much that the outrigger drop wheels are all that keep the wings from dragging before a fully fueled takeoff. With nearly empty tanks, landing is still tricky as the video shows.
Report this comment
Silvertruth
Nov. 14, 2012 at 12:35pmYou can’t compare the missions of the U2 vs. SR-71. They weren’t built for the same kinds of missions. Once a U2 was shot down, the reason the SR-71 was needed became clear. The SR-71′s sit in museums not because the U2 is a better plane but because the mission role of the SR-71 was superceeded by satellites. U2′s are in a very secondary survellance role that is being taken over by drones, so expect U2′s to join their SR-71 cousins in those museums.
Report this comment
Jwmajic
Nov. 14, 2012 at 1:16pmI think the U-2 will be around a long time as a research aircraft. but as a spy craft it will be replaced by uav’s.
Report this comment
Do The Right Thing
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:42amThey’ve come a long way since their debut, when it took 2 Buick Wildcat engines wound out tight to get that old J58 turning fast enough to light it off.
Report this comment
thegoldman
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:16amWhat did they do with the older cars ?
Report this comment
DadRocked
Nov. 16, 2012 at 11:57amGovernment surplus auctions
Report this comment
Zipit
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:16amAnd a good time was had by all!
Report this comment
tightline
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:11amI watched this all the time while in the navy. the U2 is one loud a$$ jet. As for the cars, we always had the Air Force at our shop for tires. They had very nice t-top blue camaros.
Report this comment
JP4JOY
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:05amOnly the government would built an airplane with no practical way to land it. (And that was 50+ years ago, imagine how good they are at this kind of thinking now) LOL
Report this comment
Ditto Head
Nov. 14, 2012 at 11:12amThe way they have to land this plane is practical realative to the importance of its missions. But hey, if you’re so freaking smart, why don’t you invent a better one, Edison?
Report this comment
JP4JOY
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:02amAdd your comments
Report this comment
Stoic one
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:52amOk…
Report this comment
piper60
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:49amThis a pretty cool video. I did not realize, until I looked at the video after reading the article, that there are no wheels under the wings while the plane is in flight. Thus the pogo stick/wheel. In a way, I understand the reasoning, but it still seems like a design flaw. It also makes the pilot awfully vulnerable if he has to land in a isolated location.
Report this comment