
Ron Paul (Credit: AP)
Texas congressman, noted libertarian, and former Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul on Wednesday delivered his farewell address to Congress.
“At the end of the year I’ll leave Congress after 23 years in office over a 36 year period,” Rep. Paul said. “My goals in 1976 were the same as they are today: promote peace and prosperity by a strict adherence to the principles of individual liberty.”
The nostalgia didn’t last long as Rep. Paul launched an all-out attack on government overreach.
“The wealth that we enjoyed and seemed to be endless, allowed concern for the principle of a free society to be neglected. As long as most people believed the material abundance would last forever, worrying about protecting a competitive productive economy and individual liberty seemed unnecessary,” he said.
“This neglect ushered in an age of redistribution of wealth by government kowtowing to any and all special interests, except for those who just wanted to left alone. That is why today money in politics far surpasses money currently going into research and development and productive entrepreneurial efforts,” he added.
But perhaps the most interesting moment of his speech occurred when he spoke about the nation’s youth and education.
“Expect the rapidly expanding homeschool movement to play a significant role in the revolutionary forms needed to rebuild a free society with constitutional protections,” Rep. Paul said.
“We cannot expect a federal government controlled school system to provide the intellectual ammunition to combat the dangerous growth of government that threatens our liberties,” he added.
In the end, the congressman urged his colleagues to avoid envy and “isms,” to uphold the “golden rule,” and fight only for the cause of liberty.
“I have come to one firm conviction after these many years of trying to figure out ‘the plain truth of things.’ The best chance for achieving peace and prosperity, for the maximum number of people world-wide, is to pursue the cause of liberty,” he said.
“If you find this to be a worthwhile message, spread it throughout the land,” he concluded.
Watch the congressman’s full speech here:
Follow Becket Adams (@BecketAdams) on Twitter
Full text of his speech can be found here.
–
RELATED:
(H/T: Daily Paul). Front page artwork courtesy Carl Bork.






















































































































Comments (402)
toomuchgovt
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:11pmLets talk about L. Gohmer standing up against Bohner to nominate Newt Gingrich. I might not agree with Newt, but he stood and he stood alone. Tom Price also stood up but for the second position. I wish Gohmer would have thrown his own name in. But I still applaud them both for standing up, and standing alone, that is courage. God Bless and Good luck to Ron Paul too.
Report this comment
ClaudeRains
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:08pmIn his farewell to Congress Ron Paul said ” I’m cuckoo for cocoa puffs”. He received a well deserved, bipartisan standing ovation.
Report this comment
sam b for liberty
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:27pmwhat part of him was nuts? remember the right was on a spending spree as well as the left b4 obama
Report this comment
GhostOfJefferson
Nov. 15, 2012 at 12:44pmYeah, liberty and small Constitutional governance is the road to kookiness.
You tool.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:05pmRon Paul is leaving and McConnell/Boehner were just appointed for 2 more years of leadership – God help us
Report this comment
2MINUTESTOMIDNIGHT
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:09pmThere’s always Gary Johson in 2016. Maybe he can get more than 17 votes next time.
Report this comment
Dmmcc
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:13pmI may not agree with everything Ron Paul says, but we still need passionate patriots like him that believe in freedom. I sure do pray for this country.
Report this comment
Max jones
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:28pmSOYBOT God help you? Man, you gotta be on drugs or something…..Did you ever think that HE needs you? Asking him for help when you do nothing for him, is pitiful.
If your man Ron had ever asked counsel of the Lord in his political career, and led his sycophantic followers to do the same, he’d have had more success and maybe really could have had a positive affect, instead of what he ended up with……..what?
Pray constantly and LEARN that bible you got in the cupboard…..Can’t you feel the need?
Stop yearning for a king and find the WAY! Go with the KING of kings.
Report this comment
Max jones
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:33pmDMMDC…..Too bad Ron Paul was not a “public” man of God. Even, I, would have been more interested in him. As it is …..meh.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:47pmJudge not Max Jones. Ron Paul said he doesnt talk about his religion as a politician because he is so strongly against government.
Report this comment
cous1933
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:23pmMax,
Your comments prove that, like so many other Ron Paul critics, you actually know nothing about the man.
Ron Paul is actually a devout Christian who actually walks the walk (unlike so many of the Glennbots who post such vile and hateful comments on The Blaze). He has stated that he does not use his faith to campaign or pander. A position that I’m quite sure is more pleasing to God (see Matthew 6:5)
Unlike most politicians (Republicans included), Paul does not lie,he has no scandals or skeletons in his closet, he humbly promotes peace, he doesn’t use fear rhetoric to convince you that you need your leviathon government to protect you and keep you safe.
If you were looking for a good Christian candidate, you missed the true, humble Christian. Probably while you were listening to panderers like Santorum, etc…..
Report this comment
Max jones
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:35pmCOUS….This ain’t the time for that kind of thinking….But maybe You don’t believe in the Word of God either. A man that can’t publicly stand for God, Ain’t doin’ much at all.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:51pmwow what a hypocrite…..Romney didnt talk about his religion either – for far worse reasons
Report this comment
Max jones
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:54pmCOUS…..SOYBOMB…..I’m just telling you what I would have needed to overlook RP’s foreign policy myopia. I do respect RP as much as any man, but he was never in the race, never was, ever. Nice dude, and I never doubted his patriotism or sincerity. I think he was the only man in the government not infatuated by power. But he still did not have the real issue…… the imminent installation of the Global government of Satan. Only Bible bangin’ prophecy scholars have any idea of what is going on. We are in the position that you RP guys have been in……yelling from the rooftops at the top of our lungs….nobody seems to hear or care……Bah Rahk knows!! He’s applying for the job.
Report this comment
cous1933
Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:08pmMax,
I can’t reason with a fool. Ron Paul “publicly stands for God” by his peaceful, humble actions. Like I said he walks the walk. You can continue to talk the talk.
Did you not read, or did you not understand, Matthew 6:5?
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:20pm@Max Jones
If revelation is what your end-game is, then why does it matter whether Romney, Obama, or Ron Paul is president???
Report this comment
Max jones
Nov. 14, 2012 at 11:16pmSOY my point exactly…..Actually I’m here to try to get you obviously troubled people into a frame of mind to prepare yourselves for what’s comin’ next. If that is important to you.
Report this comment
justangry
Nov. 14, 2012 at 11:22pmThat’s the perfect example of why prophesies are so dangerous. Max believes the end of the world is inevitable and coming soon, so he’s not willing to stand up and do the right thing to stop the tyranny we’re facing from our own leaders.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Nov. 14, 2012 at 11:26pmGods will will be done….While it happens i will support the candidates who support my God-given rights the most
If you follow the bible, you do not know when the end times are coming. You obviously arent here to spread the gospel so stop tearing down the only people who really give a darn about fixing this country
Report this comment
MadAsHeII
Nov. 15, 2012 at 9:19pmMax Jones, I seriously doubt that you are truly ready for what is coming. I am ready in faith and means. If you are so ready spiritually, it does not show or you would have understood that Ron Paul was the only true Christ following Christian in the running. In Paul’s own words:
“We live in times of great uncertainty when men of faith must stand up for our values and our traditions lest they be washed away in a sea of fear and relativism. As you likely know, I am running for President of the United States, and I am asking for your support.I have never been one who is comfortable talking about my faith in the political arena. In fact,the pandering that typically occurs in the election season I find to be distasteful. But for those who have asked, I freely confess that Jesus Christ is my personal Savior, and that I seek His guidance in all that I do. I know, as you do, that our freedoms come not from man, but from God. My record of public service reflects my reverence for the Natural Rights with which we have been endowed by a loving Creator. I have worked tirelessly to defend and restore those rights for all Americans, born and unborn alike. The right of an innocent, unborn child to life is at the heart of the American ideal of liberty. My professional and legislative record demonstrates my strong commitment to this pro-life principle.” – Ron Paul
Report this comment
Dmmcc
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:04pmWho is John Galt?
Report this comment
KC1
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:41pmHA! These prog RINOS caused him to go Galt.
Report this comment
Dmmcc
Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:11pmCouldn’t agree more, depressed to know that the cancer that is progressivism is killing my future and my country. Boy does it suck to be a teenager knowing this.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:51pm@Dmmcc
I have long believed that many many young people and middle age people do not vote because they see the writing on the wall and know the situation is hopeless. It is impossible to know how many feel that way – but i have a feeling it is A LOT
Report this comment
Dmmcc
Nov. 15, 2012 at 3:19pm@Soybomb
What the real problem is that me and my fellow teens are stuck with twelve years of Anti American indoctrination, only to leave for college to become full blown communist. Fortunately I am amble to tell what the lies are and truly love the constitution. It just sickens me to see the others mindlessly want to be taken care of by a government that will destroy them.
Report this comment
Crazy-Horse
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:00pmGoodbye Ron
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34v1hyfHXdQ
Report this comment
truthnstuff
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:59pm26 years and what did he accomplish? NOTHING! In the end he stuck it to the country by not supporting Romney and allowed the POS to get re-elected. A real patriot would have done anything to help stop what is being done by the communists.
Romney wasn’t my guy but anyone is better than the liar-in chief we have. Those who did not vote for Romney voted for 0bama.
Report this comment
circleDwagons
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:16pmThose that voted for romney wasted their vote. The gop lost seats in the Senate, are paulies to be blamed?
Report this comment
Wolfgang the Gray
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:17pmI respect Ron Paul & the fact that for the last 36 years, he has held to his beliefs and stood his ground on liberty and freedom for Americans. I may not agree with all his statements (I stand 100% with Israel and would fight at their side if need be), but Ron Paul always said what he meant and meant what he said. He is a Libertarian (as I am) so he didn’t march in lock step with Romney. It was not Ron Paul or the 4% (historically) of Americans that vote for him that is the reason why BHO got another 4-years.
You have the right to your opinion, of course. However, I disagree with you that Ron Paul did nothing. He may not have been successful in his presidential attempts, but that is not the same thing as doing nothing.
Report this comment
WAKEUPUSA2012
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:18pmTalking out your rear end. Paul HELPED ROMMNEY in the debates. If it wasent for RON PAUL we might still not know the truth about the Fed. In the cause of LIBERTY (I know that means nothing to republicans) he more than anyother CURRENT congressmen has been at the front screaming for it. Campaign for liberty is a huge grass roots movement. If the idiots in the republican party want to write off 20 million Paul supporters, then get ready to keep loosing. You will never know what Paul has done for this country, for your children. Get a freaking clue.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:19pmreal patriots dont love progressives either
Report this comment
resme
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:27pm“26 years and what did he accomplish? NOTHING! ”
What do you want him to accomplish? It’s why government has grown so much…. People always complaining DO SOMETHING DO SOMETHING!
Report this comment
ProbIemSoIver
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:30pm@WakeupUSA
Ron Paul’s Brother told us the truth about the Federal Reserve in this video, because he new RON would be assassinated if he said it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlCs7u1ihws
I know Wayne would not get up in front of an audience and make such claims if they were not true, because that would ruin RON perfect record and reputation as an honorable man.
Officially, This must be classified Information.
Wayne was old and didn’t care about his life at that point as much as he cared about saving mankind from the Banksters. This video hit me like a ton of Bricks.
when I started posting it it had 3700 views. I pumped it. It now has over 18,000.
I don’t care about my life as much as I care about destroying the Global Elite and their Agenda.
Report this comment
ProbIemSoIver
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:02pmLouis Farrakhan hates the International Bankers so much, he does not car about his life either.
He says that:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZkR1nMw1E0&feature=related
Report this comment
Individualism
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:05pmromney was a communist and you were a communist supporter.
Report this comment
WAKEUPUSA2012
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:22pmProbIemSoIver
Great video. Ive been at Fed protest with Wayne. In Dallas. Good man from a good christian family.
Report this comment
ProbIemSoIver
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:44pm@WakeupUSA
Awesome :) Keep up the great work, waking people up.
(Although, only about 10% can take their blinders off, I have found out. It is frustrating)
George Carlin knew that “Nobody seems to notice…. Nobody seems to care” also.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0yhHHPc7IU&feature=related
Report this comment
Benjamin Jarvis
Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:01pmBingo RESME, wishing there were more ‘do nothing’ politicians in D.C. over the last 100 years. I can’t stand the whining for the bi-partisanship, “well if both sides would just compromise they could get more things done”….WHAT THINGS! Drives me insane.
Report this comment
Tri-ox
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:53pmSOYBOMB315_II + KUPO: Like it or not, Ron Paul was running for the Republican nomination and he did not get it – Mitt Romney was the nominee. As an elected member of the Republican Party, Ron Paul had an obligation to help the GOP nominee in any way he could, and an opportunity to help rescue America from obama. Ron Paul chose to put his own personal beliefs and feelings before what was best for our country. Mitt Romney was not my first choice, but, you had better believe that I did everything I could to help him win – I stood up for America – Ron Paul refused to help – he turned his back on America – his actions are unforgivable.
Report this comment
2MINUTESTOMIDNIGHT
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:08pmIt is a waste of engergy to point out reality to SOYBURGER. Many have tried, all have failed.
Report this comment
Kupo
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:15pm” As an elected member of the Republican Party”
LOL he had no such obligation at all.
Report this comment
Oldmantex
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:17pmYes because going against your principles to do what others think is right, is so much more admirable than a man that stands by his beliefs.
If you stand for nothing, you fall for anything.
Voting the lesser of two evils, just leaves you with evil….. I guess that was something RP couldn’t live with, sad you Republicans scream about freedom and then demand a person vote against his beliefs, to support your man. That is one weird form of freedom. Vote what WE think is best or we will outcast you and call you names and ridicule you.
Then we will scream how liberals do the same thing to republicans and cry about how they dont believe in free speech because they silence differing opinions.
Sounds like RP is right, there really is no difference between Rep. and Dem.
Report this comment
KC1
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:20pmRomney didnt support a Constitutionally limited Govt and thus did not DESERVE Pauls endorsement. Such an endorsement would have tarnished Paul immaculate and distinguished record of defending Liberty and Individual Rights.
Romney voters only have themselves to blame for supporting progressivism via Romney!
To disregaurd your principals for a chance of victory, you got what you deserve.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:20pmI didnt see Gingrich, Santorum, or Perry going around the country singing the praises of Romney! Stop being such a hypocrite
Report this comment
resme
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:32pmMitt who?
Report this comment
sam b for liberty
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:32pmwhat makes the country great are the people who stand on good faith principals if more people were like him this country would not be in this mess. you had it backwards GOOD PEOPLE make a good country
Report this comment
Max jones
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:40pmKC1 Ron Paul’s ” immaculate and distinguished record ” Is all we have from him….inspiring? Maybe. Effective? No. Spoke the right words…but was NOT the man we needed him to be. Let his campaign end…for his sake.
Report this comment
Individualism
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:07pmrepublicans have no obligation to endorse democrats with an R in their name.
Report this comment
DADDYWOREAWHITEHAT
Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:03pmRon Paul refused to help? That makes it his fault?
He has no obligation to help Romney. The Romney campaign should have done something to bring the Paul supporters to his tent but they did not.
In fact they spent the convention making sure the Paul supporters felt unwelcome.
Just like the vacationer-N-chief hoped they would. Now we have 4 more years of vacations & golf & stealing from the working Americans.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:52pmI do know one thing…If Ron Paul had won the nomination, we CERTAINLY WOULD NOT BE CRYING ABOUT MITT ROMNEY’S ENDORSEMENT
Report this comment
dissentnow
Nov. 15, 2012 at 7:20amSo, if the republicans nominate a moderate progressive who supported abortion and gun bans, we are all obliagted to fall in line and support that nominee? whatever happened to standing up for what you believe in? So much for the party of rugged individualism! What you just described is pure collectivism.
Report this comment
tajloc
Nov. 15, 2012 at 8:30amYou need to read a bit about how delegates for Ron Paul were sabotaged in Tampa. Mitt stole the convention. Those that worked for Paul will not help the GOP next time. It is time for TEA and maybe the GOP will “try” to be a part of a real American movement.
Report this comment
All Pro
Nov. 15, 2012 at 4:37pmThere is NO compromise between liberals and progressives. The only negotiation that can occur would do so at gun point. Ron Paul is a classic, extreme right wing liberal just like the men that founded this country 230 years ago. You are a wishy washy linguine spine who’s strongest personality trait is the weakness of his convictions but hey, they match the weakness of your mental powers. Revolution is coming. You have only your own lack of moral conviction to blame. None of us in the liberty movement will morn your loss or that of Beck and his minions. You really have no idea what you’ve done.
Good by Ron Paul. Thank you and God bless you, from one old marine that thought he had fought his last war in 1975.
Report this comment
bhilton2665
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:52pmGoodbye and good riddance! The worst thing happened when Obama was re-elected! If Ron Paul would have stood by his party instead of trying to make a point, we’d be on our way to recovery. Instead unemployment is rising as fast as the stock market drops! Ron Paul is a selfish ideological twit that has a stake in this mess.
Report this comment
ProbIemSoIver
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:57pmYou are a moron, that hasn’t got a clue.
Report this comment
stealthman
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:02pmRon Paul’s refusal to support Mitt Romney was one of the three things that defeated Mitt Romney. The other two were Hurricane Sandy and the fact that Romney is a Mormon. For whatever reason, the Act of G-d, Hurricane Sandy was the clincher.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:02pmwhat a country
Report this comment
2MINUTESTOMIDNIGHT
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:03pmSpot on. The delusion lemings who continually harped and to this day still harp the same old song about there being no difference between The POS Kenyan Marxist Sock Monkey and Romney are heavily responsible for the mess we are in now. Thank you SOYBURGER et. al.
Report this comment
KC1
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:06pm@Stealthman
No there is only one reason Romney lost, HE IS A PROGRESSIVE!
Kudos to Paul for not selling out!
Report this comment
pantokrator
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:07pmIf the GOP didn’t turn it’s back on Ron Paul at the RNC, Romney might have pulled off a win. But the move created a division between the Republican side of America, and that stupid move cost them and they should be ashamed. Everyone who wants to blame Romney’s loss on Ron Paul are the real delusional ones. The idea that the GOP is still worth anything is as delusional as believing the Democratic Party is worth anything.
Report this comment
Gums
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:10pmIt’s called WHOM anal probe. WHOM.
Rons Paulro: What colleagues? What are you talking about? What liberty? You were the most salient force in the reelection of the worst tyrant this country has ever seen. You used your platform as a Republican candidate to destroy Republicans. It will be 50 years before we get a supreme court with Constitutionalists thanks to you. You demonized Republicans and discouraged young simple minded fools from voting Republicans. You are a disgrace and you should live in shame the rest of your worthless life. Good riddance.
Report this comment
Kupo
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:17pmWell as for me, if Ron Paul had hypothetically endorsed Mitt Romney I STILL wouldn’t have voted for him because he is a progressive.
Report this comment
ProbIemSoIver
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:22pmI will be glad to elaborate in regards to what degree you are bereft Ratiocination.
Just thinking that Romney would have put us on “a road to recovery” just shows how nescient and pathetic you are.
Ron Understood the Federal Reserve act and was going to repeal it.
That would have eliminated the IRS and a FEDERAL INCOME TAX !!!!!
But NO !!! Romney was the “Chosen one” of the Corrupt RNC.
Ron Paul would have abated the Patriot Act, NDAA, DHS, the TSA, the EPA, the Department of NO education, The Department of NO energy and more.
But you Indoctrinated, Ideologically subverted Idiots wanted the Conservative Wall Street
Minion, instead of the socialist Wall Street factotum.
Polls showed that Paul would have beat Curious George.
Paul was in Service to our Country most of his life, being a Doctor in the Military in addition to 36 years in congress with an Impeccable record. He could never get bills he sponsored passed because 95% of the politicians are Employees of the United States Corporation.
The Government did become a Corporation in 1871. It formed a “Government” that was a Private Corporation to carry on the needs of governing since our real representative republic had been destroyed by the Civil War. Although the North won, we were still divided.
The U.S. Corp. has run the show since.
Here is the difference between Romney and Odumbo:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZLqsRqKFyI
Report this comment
resme
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:30pm“The worst thing happened when Obama was re-elected!”
meh, People have been voting for statist all “their” lives. Wilson and FDR were the worst presidents, IMO. Want to see a real dictator? Read about FDR.
Report this comment
ProbIemSoIver
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:36pm*The Government did NOT become a Corp.
They formed a Corp, and then governed us with the Corp.
Here is more:
“The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a private corporation (hereinafter “Corp. U.S.”, Trademark name, “United States Government”) owned and operated by the actual government for the purpose of carrying out the business needs of the government under martial law. This was done under the constitutional authority for Congress to pass any law within the ten mile square of Washington, District of Columbia. (link to pdf image file of the full 1871 Act)”
http://teamlaw.net/HistoryOutline.htm
Report this comment
Individualism
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:09pmif you all don’t nominate a real conservative, Hilary Clinton will win in 2016 you want that?
Report this comment
justangry
Nov. 14, 2012 at 11:19pm@Kupo, If Ron Paul had endorsed Romney he would have lost ALL respect from those who bought into his ideas. It would have killed the Liberty Movement. And I’m with you. I still would not have voted for the fascist.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Nov. 14, 2012 at 11:28pmIf Ron Paul would have won the nomination, Romney would have endorsed Obama
Report this comment
dissentnow
Nov. 15, 2012 at 8:43amYou are a fool if you think that, had Romney won, we would be on our way to recovery. Romney may have slowed down the car as it heads towards the cliff, whereas Obama would have accelerated towards the cliff, but the car is going off the cliff, nonetheless. Romney and the Rinos in congress would not have proposed the amount of spending cuts needed to keep the car from going off of the cliff. If you are looking for someone to assign blame to, i suggest that you look in the mirror, especially before you decide to throw your support behind another establishment progressive.
Report this comment
kbrown1752
Nov. 15, 2012 at 11:35am@Dissent. The Car is already OFF THE FREAKIN CLIFF. Obomney is the same as Rombama. GOD sent us the way and we did not choose it. Start building the ark folks.
Report this comment
ThoreauHD
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:48pmBeck still hates Ron Paul. Because Beck is a knee jerk liberal at heart. TARP, FEMA, Derpity Derp Derp! One day when Beck stops crying to himself he’ll realize that doing the Right thing and making you feel good about yourself are not one and the same thing.
Report this comment
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:41pmPaul also said one of his first political mentors was the late Rep. Larry McDonald (D-GA), who was Chairman of the extremist conspiracy theory group, the John Birch Society (JBS). McDonald was the first person Paul called when he decided to run for Congress in ’74. Paul was the keynote speaker at the JBS 50th anniversary dinner. JBS is the organization which accused President Eisenhower of being an agent of the Communist conspiracy and they were thrown out of the Conservative movement by Barry Goldwater and William F. Buckley. Many JBS officials had a prominent role in the Paul campaign.
Let’s not even discuss what Lew Rockwell did for Ron Paul’s career… lol.
Report this comment
rwmccrory
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:56pmya, i know Ron Paul he was my pediatrician, my mom’s good judge of character and liked him and this was in 74, and you can’t have extremists as mentors and not have your own message i mean he’s not Obama who takes every word from Karl Marx word for word how to destroy a society and take over turn everyone against the rich who alrteady pay 87 % of the tax revenue.
Report this comment
KC1
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:04pmHa your still at it eh?
And with no references to crude sexual acts or revolting name calling, Im shocked TIME.
Hes retiring and even now you still cant stop with your own conspiracy like accusations.
If you applied the same criticism to other politicians as you do paul you would be more credible.
You must be full of joy to know that your side has won and now we are stuck with the likes of Santorum Newt and Romney as spokes men for “Liberty”, at least their own euro socialist definition of freedom.
Your love of Dick Morris and Bill Kristol will show itself to be wrong headed in the end and I believe the destruction of the GOP. The Liberty movement is growing and your GOP style of Big Govt is in decline, you have a decision to make, vote with us or against us because we refuse to vote against our principals and you who have none will need to choose, Liberty or Progressivism?
Report this comment
circleDwagons
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:10pm@Time to change your name. You really thought obama was better than Dr. Paul? Thanks for all the laughs. LIBERTY and Love
Report this comment
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:15pmLOL…. Horsecrap. Ron Paul parroted Osama Bin Laden, Al-Qaeda, Rearend Wright, blamed America for most of the world’s problems and apologized for America. He gave aid and comfort during wartime to America’s enemies abroad, sided with radical Islam, Iran and Palestinians. Endorsed American traitors, adhered to an ideology of racism and anti-Semitism… pandered to racists and anti-Semites. He’s radical leftist plain and simple.
Report this comment
resme
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:18pmIf only time did as much “research” for the GOP.
Blind Eye, eh?
Report this comment
WAKEUPUSA2012
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:26pm“extremist conspiracy theory group”
LOL
What a JOKE you are old man. Those terrorist who dont want flouride inthe water!!! How dare they!!! And there was no communist threat in our government? Really? Really army man? Come on you Liberty basher think. I love Regan. I love Eisenhower. Some of the greates modern patriots ever. We love Paul because of his message.He is a man, therefore he is not perfect. Are you perfect? You got the stones to getout tere and speak your mind? You think anyone would be pissed about the Fed wihout the work of Paul and others? The modern day conservative movement is starting to look more and more like RON PAUL. The idiot republicans want to win? Better start elecing constutitional candidates. Not flip floping GLOBALIST SHILLS like Rommney.
Report this comment
OperationNorthwoods
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:32pmToo bad people didn’t listen to ya Ron. But Democrats wanted their welfare state and Republicans wanted their warfare state more than they wanted individual liberty. Sad but true. We had the chance to turn things around but people wanted slick packaging more than they wanted someone who would support the Constitution.
Report this comment
Individualism
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:21pmits no more extreme than the LDS cult.
Report this comment
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:27pmIf everyone were willing to intelligently pursue his self-interest (or, indeed, were capable of doing it), then we could have a fully Libertarian society right? If everyone were willing to set aside self-interest in the name of the common good, then we could have a Communist society right? Since neither is possible, we can have neither.
This is where you Paul fans are f’d. On one issue after another, you take wholly unrealistic positions rooted in an ideologically perfected and entirely imaginary alternative to reality and then assail any who disagree with you as being in opposition to human liberty, the Constitution, and all of the other fine things that you claim to uphold.
Drug legalization example…. most “Liberal”-tarians believe that individuals have a right to put whatever they want into their own bodies provided that they do not harm others in the process. Therefore, they / you would favor the legalization of most (or all) presently illegal drugs. This could be a perfectly defensible position except for the obvious fact that one of the primary reasons why many drugs are illegal is because their prolonged usage places people into a state of desiccated decrepitude that renders them utterly unfit to support themselves. Without first seeing to it that the mechanisms by which money would then be extracted from the general public to pay for such individuals are abolished, the Libertarian position could, in practice, result in an increase in gub’ment eh?
Report this comment
FreeUsAll
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:31pm@TIME
Since Ron Paul and Lew Rockwell helped me wake up, I will make this link dedicated to you…
http://www.lewrockwell.com
Lol!
Report this comment
cous1933
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:39pmTime_2_be_Phony is at it again. The John Birch Society is an “extremist conspiracy theory group”? It’s probably the JBS Mission Statement – “To bring about less government, more responsibility, and — with God’s help — a better world by providing leadership, education, and organized volunteer action in accordance with moral and Constitutional principles” – that really upsets fake conservatives like him.
I urge reasonable conservatives to explore the JBS website and their online magazine “The New American” and I think you will find honest conservative values rather than the aggressive militarism/statism that the neoconservatives have infected the modern Republican Party with.
Research the history of the conservative movement of the 20th century in America and you will see that empire and aggressive militarism had no place in the original, true conservative agenda. You can’t have small government and empire at the same time.
Report this comment
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:46pmYeah…. Lew Rockwell, class-A racist and anti-Semite.
PLUS ghost-writer for The Ron Paul signed-off on and Ron Paul approved… Ron Paul racist and anti-Semitic Newsletters. Rockwell is a lunatic and Paul is a coward AND a lunatic for covering for this POS named Rockwell.
Report this comment
Individualism
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:51pmyou should read what the book of mormon says about jews and blacks.
Report this comment
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:56pmCOUSCOUS. Yeah, you and Alex Jones pushing the JBS… makes me really want to be a believer, lol.
Report this comment
KC1
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:58pm@Time
Its refreshing to see your change in tactics and actually propose ideas and arguments rather than childish name calling.
You claim that if all drugs were legal then those who become addicted will become dependents of the state because they lack the ability to take care of themselves. Ill grant you that, but I put it to you that this is already the case and occurs only because the Govt supports drug addicts via welfare programs.
Without welfare, drug addicts would be forced to take responsibility for their own decisions, leave them to charity family or the streets. Thus creating a huge incentive not to use drugs and those who do will be forced to take responsibility for their decisions. Govt making drugs illegal then supporting those who use them to the point where they are of no use to society has made the use of drugs a more plausible decision, because after all the state will take care of me if I cannot take care of myself. Force people to be responsible for their own decisions and then we will see a decline in drug use despite its legal status.
Report this comment
cous1933
Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:02pmTime_2_Have_a_Nanny_State,
I’ve been a police officer for 28 years and I’ve seen first-hand that the most dangerous drug is alcohol – and before you and all the other nanny-staters accuse me of being a pot-head – I’ve never used any drug, alcohol, or even tobacco or coffee in my life. Maybe that’s why I can look at this objectively.
In the first place the Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution does not give the federal government authority to make drug abuse laws, so the matter should be legislated by the individual states.
In the second place, drug addiction should be treated exactly the same as alcoholism (they are the same thing).
By the way Wm. F. Buckley, whom you mentioned in favorable (to you) terms above, was a strong advocate of legalizing drugs (not to mention an occassional user). Ron Paul, whom you have an obsessional hatred for, has never used drugs.
The truth is you just want your big government to force everyone else to be just like you and think just like you. From what I’ve read in your posts over the past several months I can honestly say that I’ve met drug addicts who have more integrity and honesty than you do.
Report this comment
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:04pmOh and btw COUSCOUS…. Capypso Louis Farrakhan and David Duke wanted to end the fed and spoke VERY highly about your boy Paul. Would that put you in the Farrakhan and Neo-Nazi camp like you’re in the JBS tank of approval? Lmao.
Report this comment
KidCharlemagne
Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:07pmTIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on November 14, 2012 at 7:41pm
============================
~~~~~~~~~~~~~Yawn~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Report this comment
Kupo
Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:16pmTime2
“Drug legalization example…”
I have personally pointed it out to you over and over and over and over again – and you keep ignoring me – that the Constitution does not authorize the federal government to criminalize things that people put into their own bodies. If you want a drug to be illegal then the proper way to go about it is through state legislation. If, instead, you advocate for overriding the states by instituting a federal ban then you are a progressive and a statist and have no care for the supreme law of the land.
Report this comment
KidCharlemagne
Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:17pmTIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on November 14, 2012 at 9:27pm
This could be a perfectly defensible position except for the obvious fact that one of the primary reasons why many drugs are illegal is because their prolonged usage places people into a state of desiccated decrepitude that renders them utterly unfit to support themselves.
=======================
This is utterly laughable nonsense………
It isn’t illegal to drink a gallon of turpentine or a gallon of gasoline either…..but yet neither turpentine or gasoline are illegal to possess….
Kids today get high off of stuff like sniffing paint, air freshener, butane, etc…….but yet paint, air freshener, and butane aren’t illegal to possess either…
If what you’re saying were actually true, then Budweiser would be declared illegal again tomorrow because “prolonged usage of Budweiser places people into a state of desiccated decrepitude that renders them utterly unfit to support themselves”….
Isn’t that right, T2?
Report this comment
cous1933
Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:28pmTime_2_Lie,
I knew I could count on you to resort to your phony, straw-man nonsense.
I suppose that every single person who ever spoke favorably of your statist Replicrat candidates (i.e. Romney, Santorum, Gingrich, etc. etc…) is a model human being right?
Let’s look at some of the true and ardent Ron Paul supporters like Judge Andrew Napolitano, Peter Schiff, Tom Woods, Col. Douglas Macgregor (ret.), Karen Kwiatkowski, Chuck Baldwin, Michael Scheuer, I could go on and on listing honest, intelligent, conservatives who make Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, and Mark Levin look like dunces. But to me it has nothing to do with supporters, its about the candidate’s honesty, integrity, and policy. Ron Paul was the only one I believed.
Report this comment
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:28pmConservatives should know better than to fall for Libertarians’ superficially appealing arguments about the “right” to do drugs, 10th Ammendment spin, blah-blah-blah—
John Locke himself argued that man’s power over his own body was not absolute, that liberty didn’t cover the right to enslave or destroy one’s self…
[…] a man, not having the power of his own life, cannot, by compact, or his own consent, enslave himself to any one, nor put himself under the absolute, arbitrary power of another, to take away his life, when he pleases. No body can give more power than he has himself; and he that cannot take away his own life, cannot give another power over it […] But though this be a state of liberty, yet it is not a state of licence: though man in that state have an uncontroulable liberty to dispose of his person or possessions, yet he has not liberty to destroy himself […]
Report this comment
cous1933
Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:35pmTypical progressive reply when people start talking about the constitution – “blah, blah, blah”.
Report this comment
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:44pmIf government is essentially the collective exercise of the individual right to self-defense, then of course people are within their rights to protect themselves from drug-related crimes and accidents by prohibiting the source.
“For leftists, drug use is a personal lifestyle choice, the condemnation of which would be the unpardonable sin of judgmentalism, while legalizers on the Right fringe frame the issue around personal responsibility, suggesting it’s paternalistic for government to keep people from putting harmful things in their systems.
Well, yes, that would be paternalistic…if that were society’s only beef with narcotics. But drugs aren’t like Big Macs or cigarettes. It’s one thing to clog your arteries or ravage your lungs; it’s quite another to consume substances that warp your mind or dull your senses to the point where you become a threat to the rights of others. And despite what the legalizers say, drugs use certainly isn’t victimless—not even when it comes to marijuana.”
Report this comment
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:55pmCOUSCOUS. The “Blah-blah-blah” relates to your disingenous, superficial but very practiced arguments regarding the legalizing of mind altering, harmful and shall I say… illegal drugs.
Doped up clowns to the left of us… dopes and dopers to the right… fringe.
Report this comment
cous1933
Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:57pmEverything you just posted about drugs is equally true of alcohol.
Report this comment
cous1933
Nov. 14, 2012 at 11:06pmYou have the same mentality that all of your fellow progressives have, you think the government is the solution to every problem. You think that people can be made moral by law. You need your nanny-state to protect you from people who are different from you.
Report this comment
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Nov. 14, 2012 at 11:13pmJust because we sanction some dangerous substances COUSCOUS does not mean that we should allow all of them. It is misleading to compare the damage caused by legal drugs with that caused by illegal drugs… instead we should compare the risks of alcohol and maybe even tabacco with those of legalized cocaine and marijuana. Most all studies show we would find that the latter are much more dangerous than the former.
Alcohol, while admittedly dangerous, is much less addictive than presently illegal drugs and also is easier to quit once addicted. Do not compound problems simply because they are difficult to solve… keep illegal drugs illegal and at the same time try to discourage alcohol use.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Nov. 14, 2012 at 11:14pmgovernment cannot fix a problem that it did not create…..Government is currently not even fixing problems that it did create
Report this comment
KidCharlemagne
Nov. 14, 2012 at 11:16pmTIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Posted on November 14, 2012 at 10:44pm
“For leftists, drug use is a personal lifestyle choice,
=============================
You got it backwards, T2…….’leftists’ are the ones who came up with the idea for Prohibition in the first place:
——————–
“Progressive reformers also took to Prohibition for they saw it as a continuation of their efforts to improve society in general. Temperance societies and Progressives alike saw the need for more governmental control and involvement in citizens’ lives. They were successful in passing several laws at the local level. Between 1905 and 1917, states across the nation were imposing laws that prohibited the manufacture and sale of intoxicating beverages. They did not stop there, however. The temperance societies began to push to change American society and elevate morality through national legislation.”
http://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/volstead-act/
Report this comment
Kupo
Nov. 14, 2012 at 11:20pm“If government is essentially the collective exercise of the individual right to self-defense, then of course people are within their rights to protect themselves from drug-related crimes and accidents by prohibiting the source”
BWAHAHAHAHA Oh my God, you actually think that criminalizing marijuana has any effect whatsoever on cutting off the source? It doesn’t, bro. All it does is pushes it into the underground black market and the hands of the drug cartels who go on to slaughter our border patrol agents.
And legalizing marijuana on the federal level does not mean that it’s going to be legal period. If a particular state wants to allow it then it should be allowed. If you don’t like it, then move to a different state or push for changing your local laws. This is not a federal matter, just as driving under the influence of alcohol is not a federal matter.
Report this comment
Kupo
Nov. 14, 2012 at 11:24pm“Most all studies show we would find that the latter are much more dangerous than the former.
Alcohol, while admittedly dangerous, is much less addictive than presently illegal drugs and also is easier to quit once addicted. ”
Right here you pull on of the classic fallacies that proponents of the drug war use. You conflate a minor drug like marijuana with a more serious one like cocaine and then give a blanket statement about “those drugs” being more serious than alcohol. That’s not a valid argument. Second, it’s completely false that marijuana is more serious than alcohol and it’s highly debatable that alcohol is less serious than cocaine. Further, how many states do you think would legalize cocaine were it to be federally legalized. Probably none at all.
Report this comment
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Nov. 14, 2012 at 11:26pmCOUSCOUS wrote…”You have the same mentality that all of your fellow progressives have, you think the government is the solution to every problem. You think that people can be made moral by law. You need your nanny-state to protect you from people who are different from you.”
Okay COUSCOUS… now you’re starting to bore me young man. I try and inject some common sense into that noggin’ of your’s… and the above is what I get. The basic circle-jerk BS by another hard head for selfish, self-righteous, self-important and self-aggrandizing stupidity and morally bancrupt horsecrap brought to us by the… ahem… “Liberty Movement.”
Freakin’ Lib-lites… boring.
Your arguments are always flawed as are most Libertarian arguments.
Report this comment
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Nov. 14, 2012 at 11:35pmGood night ladies. You’ve worn out your welcome with this Conservative. I have a business to run… gotta’ get up early. And you? You have dopiness to impress upon the masses. Don’t sleep in too late all you Timothy Leary’s…. Lol.
Report this comment
cous1933
Nov. 14, 2012 at 11:38pmJust because you say that those drugs are more dangerous and addictive than alcohol doesn’t make it true. Any experienced, impartial cop will tell you from the people we deal with daily that alcohol is at least as dangerous and addictive as nearly any illegal drug, and is the source of far more everyday offenses where another person is actually harmed.
My opinion on drug laws is not disingenuous or superficial. It is based on….
1) The Constitution.
2) The complete and total failure of enforcement efforts that not only do not reduce drug use one iota, waste hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars,and actually increase violent crime (the same effect that prohibition had).
3) The hypocricy of legal alcohol but illegal drugs (same harmful effects, same risk of addiction).
4) The knowledge that every increase in government power or control is a decrease inindividual liberty. As my favorite Founding Father T. Jefferson said – “I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it”.
5) Legalized drugs would be subject to the same state taxes and regulations (on minors and regarding motor vehicles) as alcohol.
6) The people who will use drugs when they are legal are already using them.
Report this comment
WAKEUPUSA2012
Nov. 14, 2012 at 11:41pmLOL
He has no clue that he is making no sense with the drug use arguement. He is totally uneducated. A doop. A typical modern day American. He has given all of his individual thought over to the MSM and the establishment. We all pitty him. TIME, the only thing standing in this countrys way of moving foward, is people like you. So you and the likes can jump, lost cause.
Report this comment
Kupo
Nov. 14, 2012 at 11:42pmTypical Time2. Soon as it becomes inescapably apparent that he is outclassed and outwitted he runs away with his progressive little tail tucked between his legs.
Report this comment
cous1933
Nov. 14, 2012 at 11:49pmCareful now Time_2_Be_Full_of_It.
Don’t snarl at me. You’ve already warned how your snarl makes libertarians melt or some other such nonsense.
The fact is that you are a phony, a liar, and a big-government, statist, progressive. If you would just admit that simple truth, we wouldn’t even need to argue. It your false claim of conservatism and your obsessive hatred and slander of a true, honest conservative (Ron Paul) that always makes me reply.
BTW, thanks for calling me “young man”. I haven’t been called that in decades. If you”re much older than me, people are really going to laugh at your snarl.
Report this comment
mudbitedlite
Nov. 15, 2012 at 2:57amTIME_2
I knew that your were an adherent to blind following (confidence before jealousy) but down right ignorance is a new low. John Locke was speaking of the transcendent natural law (divine ownership) in which you quoted. A law that humans were incapable of knowing.John Locke in his “Two Treatises” and “Question” would being forth traditional natural law views and then take them apart. In fact his divine ownership theory was put there so his theories could have a traditional foundation without being “strange.” You should read Locke a little more and try to understand his true philosophy. With humans right to the executive power of the law of nature (not the transcendent natural law) and his thesis on self ownership, humans in fact have the right to even commit suicide. Since a person “may destroy the thing, that he has property in,” (see his theory on property) suicide would even be permissible on the premise that human beings are self owners. According to this, Locke would be signalling the true grounds of his natural law or natural right doctrine, self ownership.
Now into the making fun of and belittling that you seem so fond of. Since you clearly can’t scratch the surface of critical thinking even when it’s in a book and directly in front of you, have you ever thought that maybe you’re just stupid? That maybe something like reason wasn’t bestowed upon that little brain you think is just leaps and bounds ahead of us unreasonable libertarians?
Report this comment
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Nov. 15, 2012 at 5:44amMUDBITEDLITE? Lmao…. another Ron Paul retread…. I’ve never seen a posting of your’s since I’ve been on here. I remember all the St Pauly Girls…. which one “was” you ???
COUSCOUS…. A Police Officer 28 years? BS. Sorry, mean’t to call your BS last night. Maybe a wayward Explorer Scout or Park Ranger but a 28 year Veteran of the force?? Bull Dookey. Like all the supposed Military Vets for Paul here…. laughable… a ruse. You guys will write anything to bolster your pro pot and pot head agenda. Reminds me of the Military donation ruse to make it look like Ron Paul got more favorable attention from folks who definately knew better. Internet straw polls for Paul… what a crock.
Say hello to Cynthia McKinney and Ralph Nader Po-Po-Poser.
Report this comment
justangry
Nov. 15, 2012 at 6:38amI’ve met a lot of bad asses. The one thing they had in common is you never heard them bragging about how bad ass they really were. They certainly didn’t call out everyone else they served with.
Report this comment
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Nov. 15, 2012 at 7:05amJUST. I only call out the Vets who identify themselves as Ron Paul Vets. Chances are very good that there is a lot of Adam Kokesh in you all. Not a good thing. You are right to be called-out as a whiner and a malcontent. I’d have personally thrown you overboard.
Report this comment
WarMunger_Al
Nov. 15, 2012 at 7:19amIf you can’t trust people to make right choices concerning drugs, why then would you allow those same kinds of people access to firearms? You are either free or you are not. Drugs were around along time before prohibition and society seems to go on just fine. The drug war has done more damage to this country than the drugs ever did or could. How can you be called the land of the free when you have the world’s largest prison population? When the people have to fear militarized police kicking in their door, by mistake or intent, and shooting them or their family? Yeah good call.
Report this comment
cous1933
Nov. 15, 2012 at 7:58amTime_2_Be_Phony,
I’ve been a sworn police officer with a fairly large city police department (650 officers) for nearly 28 years and assigned to the Crime Scene Unit for the past 18 years. My son is also a police officer with the same department. I’ve arrested hundreds of criminals, many that would make you look like a boy scout. I’ve investigated nearly 200 homicides including serial killers, not to mention thousands of other violent crimes (rapes, robberies, feloniuos assaults, etc..)
I don’t care if you don’t believe me because frankly I don’t believe that you were the military super hero you boast of being either, and your opinions are so screwed up that you are the last person I would care to impress. Every word that I’ve ever typed on The Blaze has been true. God knows that you can’t say the same.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Nov. 15, 2012 at 8:00amTime2 probably gave himself a cool nickname too
Report this comment
justangry
Nov. 15, 2012 at 8:04amNot a good thing to a statist that is content NEVER thinking for himself EVER. It’s tells me you think very little about yourself that you defer the decisions about your life to someone else.
Report this comment
cous1933
Nov. 15, 2012 at 9:12amtypo – “felonious” assaults
Report this comment
Kupo
Nov. 15, 2012 at 12:42pmYou don’t believe that a vet could ever support Ron Paul? I’ll be happy to show you my DD 214 if you like.
Report this comment
MadAsHeII
Nov. 15, 2012 at 8:37pmGuy’s, Time_2 is nothing more than a fascist socialist, period. His words should mean nothing to true liberty loving Americans. Ignore his big government views as they mean nothing. He has been brainwashed his entire life and he knows not what he does.
Report this comment
Dustoff
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:37pmNope………
Report this comment
Dustoff
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:36pmYou RP fools crack me up. Get a grip. 3 Tries…. yet me say it again. 3 tries and got NO where.
Then the fools feel into the Alex Jones and Bush 911 BS
Heck of a guy you got there. So was Bush stupid as they all claim, or very darn smart???
Fools can’t even be sure on that one…… So WE should follow you jerks. NOT
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:58pmwhats wrong with honoring a guy who believes is what the repubilcan party says they believe in???
Report this comment
mcFirst
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:05pmDustoff – so you stand with the food stampers, welfarers, unemployed, free cell phoners, that got BO relected fine. Let’s not pretend these people that gave the win to BO represent why America stands where it does today.
Report this comment
Kupo
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:30pmNot so far behind Romney’s two tries and nowhere.
Report this comment
KC1
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:09pm@Dustoff
English must not be your primary language eh?
Report this comment
RANGER1965
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:33pmFarewell Dr. Paul.
Although I didn’t always agree with your idea’s, I know that your motivation behind those ideas was to promote maximum freedom and prosperity for all individuals. A noble and honorable cause, for a good man.
Godspeed sir.
Report this comment
Dustoff
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:39pmSorry Ranger. Can’t go that way. If you know my call sign. You would know me.
Not following this fool. Some good ideas, yes. But way to many nutty ones, along with the fools who follow him!
Report this comment
pantokrator
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:09pmI agree, I don’t like everything he stood for, but he was the only one talking about the real problems with our country.
Report this comment
KC1
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:12pmWell done Ranger.
I recall you not being the biggest fan at particular points in the election cycle, but for you to acknowledge Pauls enormous contribution to the cause of Liberty shows great character and reason. I applaud your honesty and intellectual integrity despite the minor differences you may have had with his movement or stances.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:59pmSee, Ranger has the proper response to Ron Paul because Ron Paul has always fought against the expansion of the federal government.
The 50% of republicans who hate Ron Paul are just as lost as the democrats….
Report this comment
AlBundy
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:32pmAll this from someone who helped Obama get re-elected. Goodbye and don’t let the door hit you in the ass.
Report this comment
Eastinfection
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:39pmThis speech was by Ron Paul, not Mitt Romney.
Report this comment
stealthman
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:30pmAnd Mr. Paul, your enemy, Israel, will now pursue its duty to destroy the ******** Civilization that is trying to destroy it. Your favorite Founding Fathers, Jefferson and Madison launched major wars against Islam as you sought to cower in the shadow of the encroaching Caliphate. As a 9/11 Truther I am sure that you thought the Mossad carried that one out too. So begone with ya. You were a foreign policy lunatic and/ or idiot. It is best that you are going out to pasture.
Perhaps you were best suited for the job of Head of the Federal Reserve where you would have made a positive contribution to your country. But with Obamanation in charge, there is nothing else for you to do.
Report this comment
stealthman
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:53pmThe starred word was Muslim. Are these auto-censors?
Report this comment
resme
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:33pm“Your favorite Founding Fathers, Jefferson and Madison launched major wars against Islam ”
LOL, they were skirmish as best. Jefferson owned a “Quran”.
Report this comment
Eastinfection
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:50pmHey Resme..
…looks like you, Soy, Just, Circle, etc. have this one covered.. I’m going back to argue with the Atheists and Evangelists some more ;)
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:32pmEast
You could have just said “you” since we are the same person (aka encinom)
Report this comment
barryst
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:28pmExcellent speech Ron, wish more people could see what Liberyt costs.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:31pmA good man.
Report this comment
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:27pmDon’t let the door hit ya’ where the good Lord split ya’ you traitorous old bastige… and TAKE Bradley Manning with you.
Report this comment
All Pro
Nov. 15, 2012 at 5:07pmTime, anytime you want to put your teeth where your big stupid fingers are and meet this old, Marine corps vet of Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos, face to face to discuss our differences, I will be more than happy to show you the error of your draft dodging, dope using with your buddy Rush Limpdick while my friends and I were fighting and dyeing in an illegal military action that your favorite president, LBJ had to fabricate a story about an attack in the Bay of Tonkin to get authorization for.
Have you got a nut sack? Or are you just a drug addicted, cowardly, lying nut?
You are a maggot, a liar and a coward. You have NEVER served.
Report this comment
Tri-ox
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:26pmRon Paul never lifted a finger to help Mitt Romney – Paul could have had a positive impact, but he chose to wallow in his ridiculous delusions about there being no difference between America’s #1 sworn enemy, obama, and patriot Mitt Romney. Ron Paul may talk about “peace … prosperity … and liberty”, but, his actions tell the real story. When America needed Ron Paul’s help, he turned his back.
Report this comment
2MINUTESTOMIDNIGHT
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:33pmAmen brother.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:34pmwhy would Ron Paul lift a finger for Mitt Romney – dont you know about the stuff Romney pulled at the state conventions and the RNC????
Report this comment
Kupo
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:34pmActually the GOP turned its back on Paul and everyone who supported him. Or have you already forgotten what happened at the RNC?
Report this comment
KC1
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:47pmRomney and the GOP shouldnt have turned their backs on Liberty and Constitutionally limited Govt.
Perhaps they (the GOP/Romney) would have had the support of Paul and the Tea Party.
But they chose to side with the progressives. That is why they lost the election, they have no principals let alone a belief in individualism.
Romney supporters have only themselves to blame, selling out your principals for the “chance” at victory got you no where.To achieve victory without your principals in tact is no victory at all.
Report this comment
justangry
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:59pmWhy would a constitutionalist and someone that loves liberty lift a finger to help Romney? The dude’s a statist pr**k.
Report this comment
2MINUTESTOMIDNIGHT
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:06pmKC1: BS. The Paultards and Johnson mancrushers cut off their respective noses to spite their unrealistic faces. If there was even a glimpse of reality in this group, they would have supported Romney and ridded our country of the POS Kenyan.
Report this comment
resme
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:37pm“America’s #1 sworn enemy, obama, and patriot Mitt Romney.”
The real enemy is “government” and your fellow “Americans”.
Report this comment
KC1
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:48pm@2mins
What would be the point of replacing a “Kenyan” who proposes a centrally planned economy and a collectivist society with an American Mormon who proposes a centrally planned economy and a collectivist society?
Report this comment
justangry
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:56pm@2MINUTESTOMIDNIGHT, I’ll badmouth any candidate that’s put up by the GOP or DNC who doesn’t support individual liberty and a constitutionally restricted federal government in 2016 as well. After the drubbing the GOP took last week, I’d figure you establishment R’s would have learned something. You all don’t seem all that bright. You aren’t winning without us and we’re not voting for a fascist progressive.
Report this comment
Suzy_Rottenkrotch
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:23pmRon Paul, your kind ain’t welcome here no more. Individual freedom has gone out of style.
Dustoff
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:29pmAhhhhhhhhhhhh, BS. The guy is a friking loon. 911. Alex Jones… His own state spending.
Please.
Report this comment
paultard
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:22pmGlenn Pat & Stu did nothing but bash him..Most polls said he was the only candidate that could beat Obama Glenn now supports the Rothschild banking cartel (see article on hyperinflation) so there is no help coming from Glenn. The GOP used the liberty movement like a doormat and threw them out of the RNC essentially telling 12 million liberty voters we don’t need you!! Those 12 million voters sat out this time around and the majority of them were Ron Paul supporters that said Ron Paul or nothing.. This speech was among Ron’s best and I’ve seen MANY of them. Glenn will pick it apart and use pieces it for his religious right endless war neocon agenda.
Report this comment
Dustoff
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:30pmRP shot himself in the foot. 3rd try, get over it.
Report this comment
ThatsJustCrazyTalk
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:31pmAt least you finally admitted why True Conservatives really couldn’t stand you Paulbots. You’re all godless isolationists.
Good riddance to Ron Paul. Libertarianism is for people who want to become their own god, and have racist tendencies. Ron Paul had some good ideas on the fiscal side, but on the social side he was a flaming Leftist.
Report this comment
justangry
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:07pmWhat we’re calling true conservatives these days are religious altruists that support social reform. In other words, they’re just collectivist progressives.
Report this comment
Kupo
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:24pmCrazytalk
No, we’re not godless, nor do we want to become our own gods. We just don’t want the State to be a god over us.
Report this comment
pantokrator
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:49pm@Thatsjustcrazytalk, that’s just crazy talk. That comment was absolutely absurd. Libertarians want, above all else, to just be left alone, is that so hard to grasp? We are not a bunch of selfish people, and we do not all believe we are a god (I am actually a God-fearing Libertarian). Racist? The crazy talk just gets more hilarious. Libertarians are the least likely to be racists or bigots in any way. The very definition of Libertarian contradicts such things.
Your anger towards the outcome of the election is just making you sound crazy. The sooner you delusional people realize that the GOP lost because it no longer supports true liberty, true Republicanism the sooner you can put this behind you, and the easier your acceptance will become. I know this from personal experience. I used to be like you. But realize that the GOP lost because it shot itself in the foot and you begin to feel better moving forward. You can be like Ann Coulter and Karl Rove and start pointing fingers at everyone else, but it won’t help anything.
Report this comment
justangry
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:20pmMeh, the collectivists on both sides of the aisle don’t deserve a leader like him. They deserve what I believe is coming. I just wish they didn’t get to drag me and fellow liberty lovers down with them.
Report this comment
ThatsJustCrazyTalk
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:27pmYou Paulbots are hilarious!
Report this comment
Dustoff
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:31pmLeader like him??? So you’re into huge spending? Right.
Cause RP sure was.
What about 911. Inside job right jerk…
Report this comment
progressiveslayer
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:41pmJUST I know we’re too far gone and it’s actually going to happen,it won’t be long now.
Report this comment
resme
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:58pmSee what i mean, just?
Report this comment
paultard
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:07pm9/11 was an inside job.. Period. False Flag Attack to start an endless war in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Report this comment
justangry
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:08pm@Dustoff, Name ONE vote that Ron Paul voted to expand the government, raise taxes or against the Constitution. As for 9/11, I don’t know. I’ve heard both sides, but don’t have all the facts nor am I an expert in any field that would have any advanced understanding of how the towers fell the way they did or how WTC7 fell without being hit.
Report this comment
Max jones
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:26pmJUSTANGRY what are you going to do now. Have you run out of MEN you think can save you?
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:35pmMAX
wow you are projecting
Report this comment
justangry
Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:17pm@Max jones, I don’t need to be saved. I’m fine. I’d like my country to be free before I go for my daughter. Tyrants of the RNC/DNC and apathetic altruist/collectivist voters are getting in my way.
Report this comment
Max jones
Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:41pmSOY….projecting what, friend? All of our earthly hopes and dreams fall short….Always have… always will, nothing new under the sun I don’t know what you do for solace, when you need it, but I have always looked for my answers in God’s word. I get what I need.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Nov. 14, 2012 at 11:12pmwhy someone who claims to be a christian like you would come after ron paul supporters is beyond me. Romney supporters were running around this website saying how great Romney could make things – and you said nothing. You have toned it down, but about a week ago you were saying about the nastiest things i have ever seen on here
Report this comment
therealconservative
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:14pmWe’re one step closer to controlling the debt, without Wrong Paul and his Unconstitutional pork.
Report this comment
justangry
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:21pmGod you’re stupid.
Report this comment
progressiveslayer
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:25pmYou’re joking right? We’re 16+ trillion in debt and a Marxist POS president just announced the largest tax increase in American history plus Obama care? If you think we’re going to control this debt I have bridge to sell you.
Report this comment
therealconservative
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:29pmThis coming from a pothead that thrown out of the Navy.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:36pmaaaahahahahaha
Report this comment
therealconservative
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:39pm@progress
I know all that and RP kept adding to that debt, with his earmarks.
Report this comment
progressiveslayer
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:44pmTHEREALCONSERVATIVE The earmarks from one congressman vs. 120 trillion in total unfunded liabilities? We need to get some perspective here.
Report this comment
justangry
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:01pm@therealconservative, You’re f’ing liar too. I knew it the moment you posted you WERE a jarhead.
Report this comment
justangry
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:05pmThe money was already allotted to the bills he didn’t vote for. He just made sure his constituents got back some of the money that was already stolen from them by his criminal colleagues.
Report this comment
Individualism
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:12pmRomney wanted to increase military spending by 25%.
Report this comment
dealer@678
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:12pmSoy, are you gonna cry. Take a valium and lay down
Report this comment
2MINUTESTOMIDNIGHT
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:20pmSoyburger is wiping his tears with his Gary Johnson autographed panties.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:57pmliberal tactics
Report this comment
2MINUTESTOMIDNIGHT
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:12pmYour Gary Johnson autographed panties are liberal tactics?
Report this comment
circleDwagons
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:32pmFeel all the love Soy :) people hate the truth
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:53pmpschizofrentic liberals.
-They say they love the Constitution and the founders
-Then they hate us for applying the principles to real life
-Then they do everything possible (and illegal) to deny elected ron paul delegates
-Then they blame us for not liking Mitt Romney
Report this comment
KC1
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:57pmConservatives are so classy eh SOY?
Ive always said they have the monopoly on rectitude and integrity.
Restoring Love eh?
Well SOY can feel the “Love”.
Ha you Romney supporters are comical at best and progressive, ignorant, hypocritical, sunshine patriots at worst.
Report this comment
toiletclogga
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:07pmI agree with Ron Paul on the home schooling. I’d like to see the Federal government out of the schools altogether, and return this to the individual states. The Department of Education needs to be disbanded, and the teacher’s union disbanded.
Report this comment
loriann12
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:17pmThe only thing I didn’t like about Ron Paul was his foreign policy. I do agree with the homeschooling. I have an 8th grader, and I’m seriously considering home schooling him for high school. We live within walking distance of the high school, and I see what type of people go there….he’ll get his smart, white, skinny @$$ kicked every day.
Report this comment
2MINUTESTOMIDNIGHT
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:44pmFind a good charter school.
Report this comment
galicant wiseword
Nov. 15, 2012 at 3:07amI’ve heard it about a million times:
“The only thing I don’t like about Ron Paul is his foreign policy.”
Dr. Ron Paul’s foreign policy: Abide by the constitution.
Only congress is authorized to declare war. So no, Dr. Paul would not have sent troops to Israel if they were under attack. He would have petitioned congress to do the right thing.
How many people voted for the mormon, NDAA supporting, gun-grabbing, progressive in the primaries because they believed the MSM instead of taking 10 minutes to look at what Dr. Paul was really about.
Report this comment
db321
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:04pmRon can you take your annoying followers with you. They must be exhausted for all of the Copying and Pasting they did during your run for Presidency.
Report this comment
bpodlesnik
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:13pmYour ignorance is showing.
Report this comment
Kupo
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:33pmSorry DB, but we’re here to stay. Believe it or not there are those of us out here who actually value the prospect of true conservatism centered around personal liberty and more and more people awake to this view every single day. Meanwhile, the neocons, imperialists, and moral busybodies of the GOP are a dying breed.
Report this comment
Eastinfection
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:42pmlol DB321…
i really like RP but that was clever & funny…
Report this comment
rwmccrory
Nov. 14, 2012 at 7:58pmI’m a Ron Paul supporter and i pretty sure the only thing i’d copy and paste is my foot up your ass, keyboard warrior.
Report this comment
paultard
Nov. 14, 2012 at 8:10pm“Meanwhile, the neocons, imperialists, and moral busybodies of the GOP are a dying breed.” and that includes The Blaze!!
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:09pmIf anyone the homework and look at the sociological profile of the typical Ron Paul lunatic on say Facebook for example… just be honest with yourself and answer the question… what strikes you most about these people? Is it their commitment to a certain ideology? Of course not. Ron Paul’s camp said the Constitution is a statist doc u ment, (anyone know Lew Rockwell?) yet the bulk of his supporters said they liked him because he was the only one who loved the Constitution. Is it because of his Christian values? Of course not. His HERO in the entire world is a radical secular God-hating anarchist atheist. Is it because of his commitment to free markets? Clearly not. The OWS Street punks said they wanted the “end of private property” and then circulated Ron Paul petitions. There was and is nothing cohesive or congruent about Ron Paul’s core base ideologically or philosophically. What is coherent and clear is that his acolytes are by and large people who are extremely unaccomplished in our society. Is this an ad hominem argument? No, because I am not totally invalidating Ron Paul in saying this because I agree with a bit of what Ron Paul has said. I am making a mere sociological observation about his zealots. And the reason for my sociological observation is this… It directly ties into the flaw of their political activism.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Nov. 14, 2012 at 9:18pmTime2comeoutoftheclosetandjointhedemocrats
Report this comment
KC1
Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:06pm@Time
To take a few examples of some extremists or kids who have just joined the movement and paint all of Pauls supporters with that broad brush is disingenuous at best wouldnt you agree? Perhaps your tainted view of Paul comes into play.
Yes there are segments of the Alex Jones types and truthers but a wide majority of his supporters in my own tainted view is quite the opposite. A quick trip to the daily paul and you will find some of the most well read political arguments on the net. Many are successful lawyers business owners and educated students. The Paul folk have a wide tent and its difficult to paint them with a broad brush but one similarity between them all is they have a healthy distrust of the Govt, a most American quality in my opinion.
Report this comment
TIME_2_END_THE_PAUL_CAMPAIGN_IN_12
Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:22pmThere are two basic categories of Ron Paul supporters. The small amount of well-meaning folks who appreciate Ron Paul’s rhetoric regarding freedom and limited government. The other and much larger category is the Ron Paul zealot… racists, holocaust-deniers, anti-Semites, explicit anarchists, anarcho-capitalists along with those who are consciously self-aware in their belief that America is a bad guy Military bully, and needs to sit idly by in an isolationist sense as a matter of foreign policy.
Report this comment
justangry
Nov. 15, 2012 at 1:27pm@DB321, Libertarians, Constitutionalists and Ron Paul Republicans aren’t going anywhere. The party is shifting our way despite every attempt by the establishment to silence us. Remember the GOP lost seats, and the only R’s that won this time around were Ron Paul Republicans. As Ron Paul says, “An idea whose time has come can not be stopped”.
@Time2, I can play the collectivist game too. There are only two types of conservatives. Those who enjoy being forcibly groped by strange men at the airport and those that don’t.
Report this comment