Government

CIA Talking Points Given to Susan Rice Called Benghazi Attack ‘Spontaneously Inspired’

CIA Talking Points Given to Susan Rice Called Benghazi Attack Spontaneously Inspired

NEW YORK, NY – JULY 11: U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice addresses the media following a UN Security Council meeting on July 11, 2012 in New York City. At the meeting the UN and Arab League peace envoy for Syria, Kofi Annan, said via a video conference from Geneva that the UN Security Council is discussing what action it could take next to address the crisis. (Credit: Getty Images)

The CIA talking points U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice parroted on national television following the deadly terrorist attack on the U.S. Mission in Benghazi claim the demonstration was “spontaneously inspired by the protests at the US Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the US diplomatic post in Benghazi.”

CBS News was able to obtain a copy of the talking points on Thursday. Rice has been under fire from GOP lawmakers after she went on “Face the Nation” on Sept. 16, nearly a week after the attack, and said the attack in Benghazi was spontaneous and caused by an anti-Muslim YouTube video.

Read the CIA’s talking points provided to Rice:

The currently available information suggests that the demonstrations in Benghazi were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the US Embassy in Cairo and evolved into a direct assault against the US diplomatic post in Benghazi and subsequently its annex. There are indications that extremists participated in the violent demonstrations.

This assessment may change as additional information is collected and analyzed and as currently available information continues to be evaluated.

The investigation is on-going, and the US Government is working with Libyan authorities to bring to justice those responsible for the deaths of US citizens.”

President Barack Obama on Wednesday passionately defended Rice against Republicans’ attacks, saying she had nothing to do with Benghazi. That led syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer and other analysts to ask, if she had nothing to do with Benghazi, why did the White House send her out to talk about it?

What seems strange is that the CIA would come to such a conclusion when there were people on the ground at the CIA annex in Benghazi. It is now clear there were no protests outside the U.S. compound in Libya before the attack and the White House had access to live information as the attack unfolded. Also keep in mind, Rice’s comments came nearly a week after the attack, not immediately after.

TheBlaze also reported on Wednesday that Gen. David Petraeus, the former director of the CIA, clashed with agency chiefs over the CIA’s portrayal of the Benghazi attack in the days before his resignation, according to a Wall Street Journal report.

 

Featured image via AP/CBS News, Chris Usher

Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.

Comments (57)

  • louie louie
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 7:04pm

    Apparently, the MSM still has the President’s back on this one. If you were a journalist, wouldn’t you be a little upset to find out that the President sent out someone to talk to you about Benghazi who “had nothing to do with Benghazi”? Wouldn’t you feel a little disappointed to find out Susan Rice was nothing more than a diversion sent out to give the press what amounted to predigested white house talking points? If you were a “real” journalist interested in the facts you couldn’t help but feel disrespected by such a revelation. The question now is, are real journalists an endangered species?

    Report this comment

    louie louie  
  • TH30PH1LUS
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 6:46pm

    Good thing they didn’t accidentally hand her the “50 Shades of Gray” emails between Petraeus & Broadwell to read for television.

    Report this comment

    TH30PH1LUS  
  • wordsofwisdom
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 6:06pm

    I can only assume that someone is lying. I can further assume no one is going to do anything about it. I can assume my self right into believing that we are about to enter some real turbulent times. If our government will not protect their own how can I expect them to care about me? I can’t! Fact’s are such that one could assume that we are in the last days of normal life as we know it. Maybe even “The End Times” http://youtu.be/vgDkznPS4zI and maybe not. But one thing is abundantly clear. Life is about to change for a lot of people in the world!

    Report this comment

    wordsofwisdom  
    • freenj
      Posted on November 15, 2012 at 7:09pm

      Everyone should take a look at Staten Island, N.Y., Long Island, and see how well FEMA and government is helping the citizens. 0-bama had a nice photo op on SI today, what a fraud he is.
      The local charities are doing a far better job of helping, then any government agency is doing. Be prepared, help your neighbor, because government help is 0 help!

      Report this comment

      freenj  
  • peteto1
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 5:55pm

    There will be a name attached to the “CIA talking points” that was given to Rice, and it won’t be a career CIA staffer. It will be an Obama Administration hack that ORDERED some career underling to provide Rice with a CYA, false-narrative (i.e.- a LIE) to cover up the Obama Administration scandal re: Benghazi and Urkel’s massively FAILED foreign policy……

    Report this comment

    peteto1  
  • DadRocked
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 5:49pm

    Off topic – Did anyone else notice that the gray was gone in Obama’s **** yesterday? Did they add gray during the election then go back to his natural color?

    Report this comment

    DadRocked  
  • Ghandi was a Republican
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 5:32pm

    Okay They had a live feed showing there was no mob. So who is ti believe anything bu that it was a terrorist attack?

    Report this comment

    Ghandi was a Republican  
  • RETIREDLAWMAN
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 5:22pm

    Who prepared the talking points? The gardner? The janitor? What facts were they based upon?. Clapper has to be in on it.

    Report this comment

    RETIREDLAWMAN  
    • DadRocked
      Posted on November 15, 2012 at 5:26pm

      A prime suspect to be sure.

      Report this comment

      DadRocked  
    • johnpaulkuchtajr
      Posted on November 15, 2012 at 5:45pm

      Let’s see what Petraeus has to say tomorrow.

      He may just tell those Congressmen and Senators that he lied to protect the administration.

      The we have to decide who we’re going to believe, Obammie or Petraeus?

      Let me see now, a warrior with just a few merit badges like turning around the war effort i Iiraq or a guy who has given us Fast and Furious, a five trillion dollar addition to the debt, a twenty percent loss in the stock market since he was reelected, rejection of the Keystone Pipeline, a foreign policy that is in shambles and the deaths of four good men who were crying out for help.

      Let me see….. Man, this is a tough one. I’m going to have to sleep on this one.

      Report this comment

      johnpaulkuchtajr  
    • PilgrimStuckInBizarroWorld
      Posted on November 15, 2012 at 5:52pm

      The President said in the press conference yesterday that the white house sent Susan Rice to lie to the American people. The End! The white house is responsible! Will the truth ever be known?

      Report this comment

      PilgrimStuckInBizarroWorld  
  • ldonnell
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 5:15pm

    i posted a video on utube,but i can’t say whitch one it is because i have an unpaid parking ticket and i don’t want to go to jail like that guy in california.

    Report this comment

    ldonnell  
  • Detroit paperboy
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 5:12pm

    I wish Patraeus would get up in front of the American people and tell us we are witnessing the communist takeover of the last free country on earth………… Then he would have my respect, and I am but a paperboy………

    Report this comment

    Detroit paperboy  
  • ellietoo
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 5:10pm

    Petreaus lied. Why?

    Report this comment

    ellietoo  
    • freenj
      Posted on November 15, 2012 at 7:16pm

      He had a gun to his head, because they knew he was dipping his dip stick where it didn’t belong!
      Petraeus was used and now is abused publicly by this administration. His credibility is now questionable. Teenagers think with their dipsticks, and 60 year old generals should lay off the Viagra!

      Report this comment

      freenj  
  • TelepromoterNChief
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 5:08pm

    We are at a point where it is safe to place the blame on “the previous Administration” so it’s all good now.

    Another free O-pass.

    Report this comment

    TelepromoterNChief  
  • hades3
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 5:06pm

    The only thing spontanous that came out of the Bengazi affair was the talking points from the White House. Not only was it spontanous, it ws instantanious. Most lies are !

    Report this comment

    hades3  
    • TelepromoterNChief
      Posted on November 15, 2012 at 5:11pm

      I am still going with the video as the reason for all of this.

      Afterall, the moon landing was faked too.

      Report this comment

      TelepromoterNChief  
  • chips1
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 5:01pm

    Right after she was told what to say, she said, “Yes, Master”. She is so stupid that she shouldn’t be allowed to enter Costco with a membership card.

    Report this comment

    chips1  
    • TelepromoterNChief
      Posted on November 15, 2012 at 5:12pm

      She strikes me as more of a KMart shopper if anything.

      Blue light special is the only thing that makes her smile.

      Report this comment

      TelepromoterNChief  
  • 1TrueOne55
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 5:00pm

    OK what is the CIA hiding. Gun running ala Iran/Contra? Is David Petreous the new Oliver North. And who was the Turkish consul General that met with Ambassador Stevens immediately before the attack began on his temporary residence in Benghazi, why was that meeting held there instead of Tripoli etc etc etc.
    When the media starts asking those questions out loud, in public during WH briefings then maybe puzzle pieces will be found and light will reveal the hidden agenda of Obama in arming Saudi backed rebels of Muslim Brotherhood since they are the dominant force in the Arab world now. Because they have funded like Soros has a majority of the Islamic Terrorism in the area through Iran/Saudi Arabia and other Arab constituencies.

    Report this comment

    1TrueOne55  
    • DadRocked
      Posted on November 15, 2012 at 5:25pm

      1TrueOne55 – “OK what is the CIA hiding. Gun running ala Iran/Contra?” –
      Actually, you may not be to far off…
      Here in the D.C. area early talk was just that… Anti-Ghadaffi rebels being supplied weaponry originating from U.S. and that the ambassador had met with the Turkish consul General. They were trying to get the weapons back when… WHACK!

      Report this comment

      DadRocked  
    • S-O-B-E-R
      Posted on November 15, 2012 at 5:35pm

      I don’t know if this is appropriate here, but ever since I told my husband that all those surface to air missiles (or MANPADS) were looted from military installations in Libya during the ouster of Gaddhafi, he asked, “Why on earth were they there in the first place?” This was a ground engagement, no? Why would they have even had them over there? And that’s what the Seals were doing over there, right? recover and destroy the MANPADS. I don’t see this talked about anywhere.

      Report this comment

      S-O-B-E-R  
    • DadRocked
      Posted on November 15, 2012 at 5:47pm

      SOBER – That appears to be what was behind this… Here’s some toys kids… Now we want them back… WHACK!

      Report this comment

      DadRocked  
  • TheReasonableLib
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 4:58pm

    LOL now they’re “talking points.” Under Bush it was “intelligence.”

    Report this comment

    TheReasonableLib  
  • soybomb315_II
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 4:58pm

    it is clear the CIA was doing something they shouldnt have been doing and got blowback. They have tried to cover their tracks the whole time – this is why the story has been fishy all along

    Report this comment

    soybomb315_II  
  • edie1945
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 4:54pm

    Ms. Rice lied. Once a liar, always a liar. She made the choice to lie for her President. It is called…FREE WILL.

    Report this comment

    edie1945  
  • Tri-ox
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 4:54pm

    So, has Susan Rice been arrested yet?

    Report this comment

    Tri-ox  
  • OKNative
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 4:52pm

    U.N. Ambassador Rice is just another Obama pawn. He hides behind her skirt tail, then he flexes his chest as if to bully anyone who questions her narrative. What a wimp he is!

    Report this comment

    OKNative  
  • DetritusScreener
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 4:51pm

    Thats too bad… I guess Rice can blame Obama as being just another victim of his incompetence. I don’t think most of care what her or Obama’s excuse is. Either way, she is burned whtether she was part of the cover-up on purpose or not.

    Report this comment

    DetritusScreener  
  • Gonzo
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 4:50pm

    She’s just like Obama, she reads off whatever her handlers put in front of her.

    Report this comment

    Gonzo  
    • gyro
      Posted on November 15, 2012 at 5:10pm

      she reads beter

      Report this comment

      gyro  
    • Gonzo
      Posted on November 15, 2012 at 5:29pm

      Less dope in her teen years.

      Report this comment

      Gonzo  
    • toiletclogga
      Posted on November 15, 2012 at 6:52pm

      Hey Gonzo. OK we now know that Rice was given CIA talking points. Now somebody has to ask Obama why he continued to parrott these same talking points when addressing the United Nations after they found them to be false. Somebody has some splainin’ to do!

      Report this comment

      toiletclogga  
  • DadRocked
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 4:47pm

    The future secretary of stte… honor bound and a source to trust overseas… real nice…

    Report this comment

    DadRocked  
  • Paul G
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 4:47pm

    Is there anyone besides here or FNC that is caring about this? Again, is it the LSM or the 51% or the 51% or the LSM?…..

    Report this comment

    Paul G  
    • freenj
      Posted on November 15, 2012 at 7:37pm

      No the majority are using their EBT cards, dialing and texting on their free cellphones, and certainly not giving a hoot as to how to make a buck. Plus, hey it’s a week from T-Day, a big parade, football games, and a who, me worry attitude. If they had cared, Obama would’ve got maybe 20% of the freaking vote.

      Report this comment

      freenj  
  • Metallicat
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 4:47pm

    What demonstrations in Benghazi? it was a straight up terrorist attack. The Libyan leader was telling us it was a terrorist attack that night,and the administration turned a deaf ear to what Libyan officials were saying,and advanced the video story before gathering all information.

    Report this comment

    Metallicat  
  • HKS
    Posted on November 15, 2012 at 4:42pm

    She knew it was bull s*hit when she said it, the whole world did, she’s guilty of lying and that sticks forever.

    “Remember Benghazi”

    Report this comment

    HKS  
    • gyro
      Posted on November 15, 2012 at 5:12pm

      so if she will lie when told to imagine what she will do in future
      Or
      shes stupid
      ( then will fit in great in obama whitehouse)

      Report this comment

      gyro  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In