Streaker Flees After Woman Pulls Gun on Him: ‘I’m Going to Blow Your Brains Out’

Photo Credit: Ruger.com
In a bizarre incident, a streaker took off running when a Washington state woman pulled out a gun and pointed it at him.
The Daily News reports that the 35-year-old Longview woman was at Lake Sacajawea Wednesday evening walking with her six-year-old son when a man approached her aggressively while masturbating and suggested she should watch him.
Instead, the woman produced her gun.
“I put the magazine in my gun. I cocked it,” she told The Daily News. “I said, ‘You need to leave or Ill shoot you. I’m going to blow your brains out.’”
That was apparently enough to warn the man away. Within seconds he fled the scene, proclaiming, “Oh, [expletive]!” As he ran, the woman sent her dog, a Norwegian Buhund Hound, after him. When the animal wasn’t able to catch him and the man disappeared into the darkness, she called the dog back.
As for her young son, the woman said that she told him to keep calm during the incident.
“I had him turn and face toward me. I stayed calm,” she explained. “I didn’t raise my voice. I don’t think he knew what was going on.”
Police are withholding the woman’s name. In an interesting twist, she also said that she never brings her gun, a Ruger .380, with her out on walks, but since it was dark and she had “a feeling” this particular night, she decided to.
Longview police detective Kyle Sahim says officers haven’t found the man Thursday evening but are investigating several suspects. He was described as a white, in his early 20s, with short dark-blond hair.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.














































































































Comments (100)
RealManDad
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 9:54amTo those saying she should have shot, you’re out of your mind. She used the appropriate amount of force to end the confrontation. If she had shot him she would be facing charges this morning.
Now as far as not carrying loaded, she needs training so she feels comfortable to do so. She’s lucky it was not an aggressive physical threat. She would have had no time.
Report this comment
Goldmember
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 10:14amI would have shot his pecker off!
Report this comment
00100111
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 10:15amYeah I don’t know why she was carrying unloaded, but you’re right. The appropriate amount of force was used. Most times just the threat of deadly force is enough to end the assault.
Report this comment
G-WHIZ
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 10:20amShe said the word “brains” as she aimed a bit lower! Aaa–Hah!! :-)
Report this comment
kapnkd
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 10:29amTo goldmember (below):
Probably too small a target for her to hit! ;-))
Report this comment
JMJMX4
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 12:04pmIn my state you can not carry a loaded weapon. Gun and ammunition have to be carried separately. Liberal logic.
Report this comment
copakeman
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 12:36pmshot to kill, never call the cops, go home, say nothing, and take comfort you have eliminated vermin from our worlld.
Report this comment
Lgbpop
Posted on November 17, 2012 at 7:29pmSome real sickos here, willing to tolerate this kind of behavior. Better her gun go off accidentally than his deliberately.
Report this comment
Carlinpa
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 9:53amRE”When the animal wasn’t able to catch him” ?? That is one slow ass dog… or fast as dude!
Report this comment
Wool-Free Vision
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 11:09amWell, he was running hard.
Report this comment
jheasler12175
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 1:38pmThe dude was probably more motivated than the dog.
Report this comment
I Aint PC
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 9:39amThat is the Ruger LCP, chambered for .380. Ruger also makes the LC9, which is 9mm. Both are easily concealable firearms. I really like my LC9.
Report this comment
denbren52
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 9:37amI don’t think he’ll be pointing his weapon at anyone in public for quite a while. But is is a shame that the dog didn’t get a chance to play with his chew toy.
Report this comment
AppleAnnie
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 1:00pmROTFLMAO. Do you provide tissues to so I can clean my monitor…herbal tea. Thanks for the great laugh!
Report this comment
banjarmon
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 1:45pmGood one!!!
Report this comment
Mar97ilyn
Posted on November 18, 2012 at 12:11amWell written, only a few words said it all, and covered the entire incident completely.
Report this comment
Mahtoska
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 9:27amBIOHAZARD23
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 8:38am
Do those guns come in pink? I think I may need to add something to my Christmas wish list. :)
As a matter of fact, they do come in pink and you can get them with an underbarrel crimson trace laser sight too….Ruger! American Made!
Report this comment
Seth Patriot
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 9:25amI guess her weapon was bigger.
Report this comment
Proverbs17-12NLT
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 9:56amCan you imagine bleeding out on the sidewalk naked what the newspaper headlines would be.
Report this comment
Vickie Dhaene
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 10:08amThat was very funny! I actually giggled out loud.
Report this comment
jungle J
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 8:46amkeep the weapon ready lady.
Report this comment
rickc34
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 9:04amFunny, but I think she was pointing a little lower than his head. She should of shot him.
Report this comment
hempstead1944
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 8:30amShe should have shot the SOB.
Report this comment
PorkPIG
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 8:48amWrong there was no reason to shot , the situation was averted . You are a fool and are giving those of us who carry responsibly a bad name .
Report this comment
PorkPIG
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 8:51am*shoot
Report this comment
starman70
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 9:01amShe did exactly the right thing. Had she shot him, her son might have been traumatized. She defused the situation RESPOSIBLY and when the threat ran off, the problem was solved. She WAS, however, prepared to defend hreself and her son had the situation worsened. She would have used her weapon and rightly so.
She is a shining example of responsible carry laws and responsible gun ownership. She is to be commended. Has it been England or any other country where guns are prohibited, she more than likely would have been raped while her son would have had to witness the incident. Is this what you would want your child to witness?
Report this comment
ChiefGeorge
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 9:25amHer response was measured and responsible. Anything else would have been murder. Those wanting blood will always be with us.
Report this comment
00100111
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 10:19amShe used exactly the right amount of force. Most times in an assault or attempted assault, just the mere presence of a firearm deescalates the situation and ends the encounter. I understand the DESIRE to take him out, but if she had she’d likely be charged with manslaughter. BUT! You can spell manslaughter without LAUGHTER!
Report this comment
Mar97ilyn
Posted on November 18, 2012 at 12:16amWhy should a sorry cowardly piece of slime like this be allowed to carry on? You notice it was a woman and little child he approached, not a man. Next he will go on to rape if he keeps getting away with such actions, and I sure don’t want it to be my little daughter.
Report this comment
Beachbaby
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 8:24amA demon in the dark. No woman should be without protection. She should have protection while taking a bubble bath. Its that bad out there.
Report this comment
ONLY4UANDME
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 8:20amExactly. Unless he was a Dem then the article was politically correct.
Report this comment
nocommie
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 8:17amThank God for Ruger.Next time,lock and load before you leave the house.
Report this comment
taintso
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 8:24amExcuse me please sir, I know my clip is in here somewhere.
Report this comment
poorrichard09
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 8:26amYeah, she’s lucky she had time to put in the mag and **** it.
Report this comment
Paulhgreenbay
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 8:11am“I didn’t raise my voice. I don’t think he knew what was going on.”
Anyone thinking lady Clint Eastwood?
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 8:06amI’d say that she should consider herself lucky. Had the streaker actually targeted her for an attack she never would have had time to insert the weapon’s magazine then put a round into battery. While I hope the cops explained this to her, and that she should seek some training. I’m surprised considering that this was Washington state, that she was not arrested.
Report this comment
Chamber
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 8:23amWashington has a concealled carry law, so since she wasn’t arrested she must have had a CC permit.
Report this comment
biohazard23
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 8:38amDo those guns come in pink? I think I may need to add something to my Christmas wish list. :)
Report this comment
PorkPIG
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 8:51amVery True , Chambered is the only way to go . But on the other hand , comfort level is also big factor , Id rather she carry unloaded if she is not 100% with the weapon , I agree Training is needed.
Report this comment
RRFlyer
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 9:37amWashington State also has Open Carry. However if it had been washington dc SHE would be the one arrested.
Report this comment
SilentRunner
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 7:59amThe Ruger shown with this article looks like the gun I have in my pocket when I go out of the house.
Report this comment
SuzetteD
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 8:13amLove my S&W 442.
Report this comment
Perspective
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 7:57am“Streaker” ? Since when is a pervert masturbating in front of a woman and her young child a streaker? Call a spade a spade,this guy was a sexual predator who chose the wrong prey.Shame she didn’t knee cap him with a few rounds so he couldn’t assault anyone else. How sad is it that political correctness causes this predator to be called a “streaker” ?
Report this comment
taintso
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 8:04amShould have called him a democrat.
Report this comment
wkw58
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 7:50amExcellent! Good job Mom….that’s what the Second Amendment is all about. Also, please substitute “pervert” for “streaker” in the story.
Report this comment
BrerRabbit
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 7:39amShe did too much talking!
Report this comment
SilentRunner
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 7:51am…and not enough shooting.
Report this comment
uffdaubet
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 7:39amThat kid has the absolute coolest mom in the entire world.
Report this comment
GETLIFE
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 7:34am“Streaker” is a euphemism here.
Streakers don’t give the impression of impending sexual assault.
Report this comment
GuruMeditation
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 7:36amIt was sexual assault for sure. Until it was quickly stifled.
Report this comment
lel2007
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 7:26amWashington (state), Land of Liberals? I wonder if this woman will face charges for ‘brandishing’ or carrying a deadly weapon in a public park, maybe both. Something fishy about this woman’s story. How many white guys you know can out-run a Norwegian Buhund Hound?
Report this comment
PorkPIG
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 7:56amUnless it was a trained attack dog , I doubt the pursuit by the dog was very intensive .
Report this comment
thegreatcarnac
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 1:18pmRacist!….I guess if he were black he would outrun the dog. YOu know….a horse can outrun me too but that doesn’t make him my equal.
Report this comment
bikerdogred1
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 7:26amThis man should be arrested for trying to be a government employee and the women all I can say is,SHE IS A KEEPER,a great job.
Report this comment
RightUnite
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 7:12am#1 – Gut instinct… Always listen to your gut.
#2 – Gut instinct are not always there. Why would anyone, in their right mind go out walking with a child after dark??
#3 – Should have shot him. End of discussion.
Report this comment
maxtread
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 7:23amI’m from Texas, so it gets dark a little after 6 pm, but in the northern reaches of the country, it gets dark around 4:30-5 pm. My first trip to Boston was in the middle of the winter. It was pitch black outside by 4:30. So if you want to do anything after work, more than likely it will be in the dark.
Just food for thought.
Report this comment
GuruMeditation
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 7:31amGut instinct usually works and carry daily.
Report this comment
RightUnite
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 7:54amI still think you’re a fool if you’re going to take a child for a walk after dark. I mean, there are how many hours of daylight. You’re just asking for trouble walking after dark… No excuses…. And yes. ALWAYS carry. It’s a dangerous world out there.
Report this comment
PorkPIG
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 8:47amIf you can carry always carry . 2 thug threaten to rob me one day and told me they had a .22 on there hip , I exposed the handle on my .38 snubby and they’re attitude changed immediately and the made hasty exit .
As to #3 – YOU are an Idiot , Taking someone’s life is big deal , you should only shoot if your life is immediate danger and you are left with no options . I hope you do not own any weapons . You are one of reason Guns and Owners get a bad Name .
Report this comment
RightUnite
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 9:09amYeah, you’re right… #3 was pretty much bluster…. Like most or 99% of the people here on the Blaze, they really wouldn’t do what they say, but SOME people don’t get that, I guess.
Report this comment
PorkPIG
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 9:55amSome ppl , They ( the left) are looking for any reason to take away our rights , Please do not supply them with some .
Report this comment
00100111
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 10:23amThere was no reason to shoot him. She drew down on him and he ran. He was no longer a threat. If she’d shot him then, she’d be charged with manslaughter. I understand the desire to take him out, but she made the right call here. She was prepared to do so, and if he’d made a move toward her I’m sure she would have, but he ran.
Report this comment
AZRACISTBIGOT
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 3:27pm@Rightunite
Maybe she is a conservitive and has a job that takes up all of the daylight
Report this comment
kickagrandma
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 7:06amAlso seems something else is missing in the description…. : )
This is one of the first times I’ve even smiled since the stolen election.
Report this comment
DZ-015
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 11:10amYou think she store his election?
Report this comment
Mister Natural
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 7:06amhe must have been from the local military or secret service headquarters
Report this comment
kickagrandma
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 7:04amBrains are not what I would aim for (and hit)!
Report this comment
GuruMeditation
Posted on November 16, 2012 at 7:35amIt this case I think this morons brains and his nether regions are one in the same. Always carry. It often brings forth politeness and honesty in even the most deranged individuals.
Report this comment