Faith

Shock Study: Female Porn Stars Have Higher Self-Esteem, Better Body Image & Are More Spiritual Than Other Women

There have been some odd stories about porn stars emerging of late. In October, retired adult film star Ron Jeremy made a fascinating claim while speaking at a Michigan church — that the majority of porn stars believe in God. While this was startling enough in its own regard, a new study from “The Journal of Sex Research” has also come to some noteworthy conclusions.  Among them, that women in the porn industry allegedly have a better body image and higher self-esteem than females working in other, less-sexual careers.

Naturally, the results will be disputed, but they certainly raise a number of questions. Conventional wisdom has been that those individuals working in sex-centric careers have lower self-esteem than other women as a result of being exploited. In this particular study, entitled, “Pornography Actresses: An Assessment of the Damaged Goods Hypothesis,” researchers who compared 177 porn stars with women in other careers found quite the opposite.

Journal of Sex Research: Female Porn Stars Have More Self Esteem Than Others

Former porn star Jenna Jameson (Photo Credit: AP)

“Stereotypes of those involved in adult entertainment have been used to support or condemn the industry and to justify political views on pornography, although the actual characteristics of actresses are unknown because no study on this group of women has been conducted,” an excerpt from the study reads. “Some descriptions of actresses in pornography have included attributes such as drug addiction, homelessness, poverty, desperation, and being victims of sexual abuse.”

According to Inquisitr, researchers found that female porn stars were also not more likely to encounter sexual abuse during their childhood years when compared with other American women. The Toronto Sun continues:

The study…said it found no evidence to support the “damaged goods hypothesis” that actresses involved in the porn industry come from desperate backgrounds. Rather, the researchers found the women have higher self-esteem, a better quality of life and body image, and are more positive, with greater levels of spirituality.

The study was conducted by researchers at Pennsylvania’s Shippensburg University, Texas Woman’s University and the Adult Industry Medical Healthcare Foundation.

Journal of Sex Research: Female Porn Stars Have More Self Esteem Than Others

Adult film star Ron Jeremy, left, signs his book for Jean Austin of Canoga Park, Calif., during the Adult Video Network Expo, Thursday, Jan. 19, 2012, in Las Vegas. Credit: AP

The actresses who were included in the sample had all been paid to work in at least one porn film. They ranged from ages 18 to 50 and, according to the Sun, had an average career length of at least three and a half years. While about four in 10 were single, more than one-third reported being either married or in a serious relationship.

While some may argue that the sample size is too low (after all, 177 isn’t necessarily a large pool, especially when it comes to scientific research), the results are startling.

Related:

Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.

Comments (102)

  • OniKaze
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:58pm

    I may be in the minority here on the Blaze, but I do not see a problem with pornography (when responsibly consumed).

    While I don’t think one should waste all of their time consuming porn, a occasional viewing I don’t think hurts anything when it is viewed responsibly by adults. Does it mess with Kids? I guess it could depending on the age of exposure, but I don’t think Porn is the great evil that many people on the blaze say it is…

    When I was in college, a few of my friends were in the “adult entertainment” industry, and while they were un-adversely effected by it, some of their “co-workers” were not… So While I will say it is not for everyone, I don’t think it is the bad thing that many say it is… The Modern adult industry is not what it was 15 to 20 years ago, and it has not been able to shake that old stigma (and likely never will).

    I am not shocked that many women from today’s “industry” are not like what they were 20 years ago.. Back then porn was “un-regulated” and un-restrained, where thankfully now, many (but not all) of the shady things that used to happen no longer do…

    My stance on Porn is simply this: If you like pornography, consume it responsibly.. If you don’t like pornography, DO NOT CONSUME IT..

    Simple right?

    Report this comment

    OniKaze  
    • HigherRoad
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 2:32pm

      This is just another rung on the ladder of descent into moral decay. Yes, I know these things have been around since the beginning of time, but the more passive and tolerant we become toward evil and depravity in our society, the less chance we have of regaining our moral conscience. Look at the platform for the Democratic Convention–abortion, homosexuality, free birth control, and rejection of God. As a result, we got dishonest election results and a president who lies and deceives.

      Report this comment

      HigherRoad  
    • LetUsReason
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 2:34pm

      I suppose one could say the same for any vice, right?

      Example: I don’t have a problem with abortion. If you decide to abort, do it responsibly. If you don’t believe in abortion, then don’t do it.

      I imagine that you could use this template for just about anything, including pornography. The problem today is that people like you say, “Sin is sin only if you believe that it’s sin. What’s sin for me may not be sin for you, and vice versa.” Sin responsibly, you say. Interesting outlook. The term for this philosophical belief is moral relativism. It is present in the decline of any great civilization and is rampant today.

      Report this comment

      LetUsReason  
    • CoGod
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 4:21pm

      Yes simple. And so is “You can enter God’s Kingdom only through the narrow gate. The highway to hell is broad, and its gate is wide for the many who choose that way.”

      If you say it is OK then great. If the majority say OK then great! As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.

      Report this comment

      CoGod  
    • TheSword
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 4:29pm

      Well…if you’re a Christian then there is no denying that pornography is wrong and a sin equal to adultery. Jesus specifically says “Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.” (Matt 5:27-28) Pornography is specifically made to satisfy people’s lustful desires. Thus, you must either admit that it is a sin to be abstained from or you must call Jesus a liar. I wouldn’t recommend the second one.

      If you’re not a Christian, then what I just said will probably confuse or anger you, but that doesn’t make it any less true. Pornography is wrong no matter how you look at it.

      Report this comment

      TheSword  
    • glckgrl
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 5:06pm

      I disagree, respectfully. I have many friends who are former dancers and “stars” — most of them had abuse and violent backgrounds. Without fail, all of them became spiritually bankrupt, hooked on booze and/or drugs to be able to live with what they do for a living. There’s been no cleanup in Georgia or Florida or South Carolina, where they are obliged to show in a disgusting manner. I know men who would choose a video over their wives. Read Linda Lovelace’s autobiography for an accurate portrayal. Bless those poor girls.

      Report this comment

      glckgrl  
    • athiest-infedel
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 5:56pm

      OniKaze well said, my wife and I used to watch porn and go to strip clubs until the girls became younger than my daughter, then the creapy factor set in and we just had our 21 anniversery.

      Report this comment

      athiest-infedel  
    • DeniseR55
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 6:02pm

      I think it’s sad that to get sexually excited people have to watch other people have sex before they can MAKE LOVE to the person they supposedly love. You are the watchers really making love too, the porn female star or porn male star, because they are the ones who got the person watching sexually excited? Porn is demoralizing and undermines the personal relationship of those who watch, whether they want to admit it or not. It robs them of intimacy, which is the foundation of any relationship..

      Report this comment

      DeniseR55  
    • HigherRoad
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 7:05pm

      DENIS55: You are so right. Since the “turnover” in the industry is every 3-1/2 years according to the article, how can a wife expect to compete with the constant new crop? The porn stars are glamorized and made to appear flawless (I would assume; I’m not a viewer). That means that the porn viewer will be less tolerant of the natural flaws in the human body. God admonishes a man to be faithful to the wife of his youth (Proverbs 5).

      Report this comment

      HigherRoad  
    • FJR-Tiger
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 7:13pm

      If you don’t object to your mother, sister, or daughter “performing” in the biz, at least you’re intellectually honest. Otherwise, you might want to put yourself in the shoes of a parent who’s daughter is in the pornography industry and the heartbreak they must endure to allow you to “responsibly” consume the product.

      Report this comment

      FJR-Tiger  
    • black9897
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 8:13pm

      I get what you’re saying, and maybe from a non-Christian point of view you’d have a point. Even so I’d say stay away from it all together. If someone is married then they should be looking at each other and not anyone else. Granted, some couples watch and have no problem with it.

      People talk so much about having the “right” to have an abortion in any case and it’s some war on women’s rights, etc. Well what about porn? I mean it objectifies and degrades women. I really don’t see any good that comes from porn. That’s just me though.

      Report this comment

      black9897  
    • girlnurse
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 9:20pm

      So if you have a mother and/or daughter/sister…how would you like guys getting off on looking at their naked body and wanting to rape them right there on the spot? Its stuff like this that contributes to child abuse, pedophilia, rape, and murder. God made sex and the way He wants us to have it is between a married man and woman…He has his reasons for everything and besides do you know how many marriages are being ruined right now in the US by men/women who are hooked on online porn???? It’s staggering and I have first hand experience that it ruins families and hurts children.

      Report this comment

      girlnurse  
    • sillyfreshness
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 11:14pm

      I would doubt anyone would have low self esteem who would get naked and partake in sex acts for everyone in the world to see. To the contrary, one would have to be very vain.

      Report this comment

      sillyfreshness  
    • Vegasdad702
      Posted on November 27, 2012 at 3:04am

      @Onikaze- WELL SAID!!! This is what separates conservatives from Libertarians. The failure of the conservative right, is in the hypocrisy of claiming to stand for freedom, as long as it doesn’t fly in the face of their religious beliefs. Seems that if God is in control, and God wants us to find and follow him, we should be free to figure it out on our own. Forcing someone to be moral only creates rebellion. Gods message and kingdom can’t be forced, it must be found by the INDIVIDUAL. I grew out of these habits from asking moral questions in my own life. NOT because of some stigma or religious bigotry. This is where the right fails. EVERYTHING they/we stand for is righteous, just the ability to let people figure it out for themselves eludes so many. :( You either believe in FREEDOM or you DON”T. I refuse to play the hypocrisy game on what people should be free to do and not to do. I do not pretend to know what is right for anyone besides myself, and I am not so arrogant in my faith to pretend I KNOW God’s plan for another as well. Interesting study. I find it funny that there are so many arrogant, and paranoid remarks that followed your comment. Not sure if you are a Libertarian, but I agree with your take on this topic. Well said. God Bless

      Report this comment

      Vegasdad702  
    • black9897
      Posted on November 27, 2012 at 1:03pm

      @VEGAS

      I don’t think anyone is saying someone doesn’t have the choice or shouldn’t have the choice (unless you’re Rick Santorum) just that it’s not a wise choice to make. It’s something that’s easy to abuse and usually results in very bad outcomes. Even if not abused from a biblical standpoint it would still be wrong. I most certainly agree that God’s message cannot be forced and must be willingly accepted. A lot of people forget that.

      Report this comment

      black9897  
    • LetUsReason
      Posted on November 27, 2012 at 6:17pm

      @ VEGASDAD702

      I’m all for hands-off government, like you are. But where does it end? Some say there is a fine line between true libertarianism and anarchy. So you must be for abortions, too, right? Because who are you (as a libertarian) to say the government should or should not let someone have an abortion? Then…if you support that, you must also support murder. True? Who is the government to legislate my choice to kill someone? See where this is headed? Libertarianism in its truest sense is disastrous, and it destroys the one thing you say you stand for–liberty. In order for liberty to exist, you MUST have laws. The trick is to set up the kind of government where its laws only support (not diminish) those freedoms. Does the kite’s string keep the kite aloft, or does it restrict it from flying even higher? The string is our laws, and the kite is our country. Libertarians say cut the string. Do it, and the kite crashes.

      Report this comment

      LetUsReason  
    • Vegasdad702
      Posted on November 27, 2012 at 6:27pm

      @Black- Spot on point of view. I agree with what you are saying very much. :) The only point we disagree on is that “others’ in this thread do want to force and impose “their” religious beliefs upon those who wish to work it out for themselves as INDIVIDUALS. Thank you for the comment. :)

      Report this comment

      Vegasdad702  
    • Vegasdad702
      Posted on November 27, 2012 at 6:54pm

      @Letusreason- Well, I see you point, but if I were to follow your model of thinking I could easily say the Conservatism is a thin line from Fascism, if Libertarianism is a thin line from Anarchy. Given the choice between Fascism and Anarchy… I think im gonna go with Anarchy. But truth be told I would NEVER settle for either I would always fight for LIBERTY. Now on to the Abortion question. If you would like my opinion on this its simple. I believe life begins at conception. I believe both religion and science support this logic. I also realize that I didn’t always think this way, and regardless of laws or pop culture my opinion was never really swayed much when compared to PERSONAL experiences, like friends, and personal experiences when faced with this topic. The act and process of abortion is here. It is NOT going away. No law, no restrictions, not amount of force will EVER remove it from our society. Even if new laws were established prohibiting it, the level of science and medicine would still continue regardless of how I felt PERSONALLY. I believe EVERYTHING is GODS plan. Meaning EVERYTHING has purpose. EVERY INDIVIDUAL must decide for THEMSELVES, and live with their actions forever after. It is not mine or yours to control. Also, when we speak of murder. Is one who commits murder automatically damned? Are they not allowed forgiveness in the eyes of God? And doesn’t that redemption lie ONLY in a PERSONAL relationship with God and themselves? answer- GOD & INDIVIDUAL

      Report this comment

      Vegasdad702  
    • Vegasdad702
      Posted on November 27, 2012 at 7:04pm

      @Letusreason- Also I would like to simplify my answer a bit. Libertarians believe in three main things- LIFE, LIBERTY, and THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS. ANYTHING that robs someone of their rights like Abortion or murder is WRONG. I just don’t believe I have the right to FORCE someone into thinking just like me. I believe MOST people will eventually figure it out on their own. WHO AM I TO ROB THEM OF THAT?? I didn’t always understand this basic principle and I DO think LEGALY we need to define when our rights begin. WHEN do my rights promised by the Declaration of Independence begin?? We as a country SHOULD define this promise and right LEGALLY. I think that would solve a lot of this debate between Libertarians and Conservatives. Until then, I fear our kite maybe stuck in a power line! LOL thank you and God Bless. :) :) :)

      Report this comment

      Vegasdad702  
    • black9897
      Posted on November 27, 2012 at 10:58pm

      @VEGAS

      Thank you sir.

      @LETUS

      To add to what VEGAS said. Being a Libertarian doesn’t mean you think people should be free to violate others rights. Granted, on the party platform they think it should be left up to the women. Thus why I don’t’ like putting myself into a box, even if it’s Libertarian. I only pick that because it matches most of my beliefs (and most of our founders).

      The line that you draw is very simple and was really meant to be this way from the start..and that is, does it violate someone’s rights and or cause damage? I know there might be some iffy ones that are in a grey area, but for the most part this can be used. Thus why abortion is murder. As much as I would like to see it illegal, I’m not sure that will happen. More importantly we must focus on how to cut down on the number of abortions no matter if it’s legal or illegal.

      Report this comment

      black9897  
    • LetUsReason
      Posted on November 29, 2012 at 2:15pm

      @ BLACK and VEGAS

      Good points, and I think we probably agree on most things. Like I said, I tend to lean libertarian. Like you, if the pendulum has to swing to either Fascism or Anarchy, I choose anarchy. We’re just haggling over the “grey area”, as Black put it.

      Report this comment

      LetUsReason  
  • searcher619
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:57pm

    Is that why so many of them get a crap-load of cosmetic surgery?

    Report this comment

    searcher619  
  • FalseFactBob
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:55pm

    Fun Fact: Females got introduced into tho porno industry 1hr after the first moving picture was invented infact that was the motivation for the invention of the moving picture. Even though female porn stars are happier and less self concious of them selves it is short lived because of AIDS. 100% of female porn stars are unhappy and very self concious after getting AIDS. But when asked they admit to being very happy and not at all self concious before getting AIDS

    Report this comment

    FalseFactBob  
  • theotherberean
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:40pm

    You can be spiritual without being Christian.

    World English Dictionary
    spiritual (ˈspɪrɪtjʊəl)
    — adj
    1. relating to the spirit or soul and not to physical nature or matter; intangible
    2. of, relating to, or characteristic of sacred things, the Church, religion, etc
    3. standing in a relationship based on communication between the souls or minds of the persons involved: a spiritual father
    4. having a mind or emotions of a high and delicately refined quality
    — n
    5. See ***** spiritual
    6. ( often plural ) the sphere of religious, spiritual, or ecclesiastical matters, or such matters in themselves
    7. the spiritual the realm of spirits

    Report this comment

    theotherberean  
    • brother_ed
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 2:51pm

      @THEOTHERBEREAN

      My thoughts exactly!

      I would also argue that if they were to interview the hundreds of thousands of other women in the porn business (dancers, prostitutes, etc.) they might find a little different answer.

      It’s one thing to agree to be in a movie with Ron Jeremy, and quite another to deal with the clientele these other girls have to deal with just to put food on their table.

      Also, like any other vice, it looks fun – and may even BE fun for a while – then the bottom falls out and your ‘friends’ are nowhere to be found.

      Report this comment

      brother_ed  
  • hi
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:38pm

    The true test is to ask people if they want their daughter to grow up to be a porn star.

    Report this comment

    hi  
    • Southernsoul
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 4:46pm

      or a waitress at Waffle House. What a moronic argument.

      Report this comment

      Southernsoul  
    • Chuck Stein
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 10:08pm

      @ Southersoul
      How is that “moronic” to consider someone close to you in that situation? Seems like a very good way to evaluate if it is “good” or “bad.” Do you really see no difference between being an “actress” in a porn movie and being a waitress in a Waffle House? If so, your labeling something “moronic” is of particular irony.

      Report this comment

      Chuck Stein  
    • Vegasdad702
      Posted on November 27, 2012 at 3:22am

      The problem with this question is it is a tyrannical one. “ask if THEY would want THEIR daughter to be a porn star”. UMM Shouldn’t that really be up to the daughter and NO ONE ELSE???

      Report this comment

      Vegasdad702  
    • Chuck Stein
      Posted on November 27, 2012 at 4:20am

      @ Vegasdad702
      As I read the question, the emphasis would seem to be: “if they WANT their daughter to grow up to be a porn star”. “Want” has to do with desires and feelings, not force, command or “tyranny.” Maybe HI could clarify.

      Report this comment

      Chuck Stein  
  • BenFrank1791
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:37pm

    The women at the well ? Really ?

    Report this comment

    BenFrank1791  
  • red1
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:33pm

    I suspect this study is accurate for the porn stars they surveyed. Its accuracy for the whole population of porn stars seems unlikely to me. I have observed that successful porn stars, like Jameson, tend to be strong, confident women. I suspect that successful porn stars were the only porn stars they studied. The vast majority of women who have worked in porn are not as successful as Jameson. I would wager that Jameson would have been successful in anything she did. I think most women who work in porn in fact do have pyschological and emotional issues and have probably suffered some abuse in their lives, do lack self-esteem, and engage in self-destructive behavior.

    Report this comment

    red1  
  • RJJinGadsden
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:28pm

    Where is R0G4TUM_2012 on this article? I’m sure that he could tell everybody here who expressed an opinion how they are wrong, all while patting himself on the back. Maybe he even orchestrated the “survey” that came to this conclusion.

    Report this comment

    RJJinGadsden  
  • Inkbottle
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:27pm

    Even the demons believe-and tremble.
    James 2:19b

    Report this comment

    Inkbottle  
  • Hoax And Chains
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:23pm

    I do not buy, rent, or watch these films. That said, what I want someone to explain to me is, for the money these women willingly sign on for, how are they being exploited? What about the men? Are they not also “exploited”? It’s like saying the women in Sports Illustrated’s Swim Suit issues are being exploited… really? Some people have come out of that industry rejecting their past and feeling sorry for it. Still, others do not. Statistically, if the numbers are crunched right, questions are neutral, and the samples are selected without predetermined factors, 177 people can give a relatively accurate inference to the population in the adult film industry.

    Report this comment

    Hoax And Chains  
    • searcher619
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 2:05pm

      I don’t get why you felt you have to tell us that you don’t watch these films. What did that have to do with the rest of your comment? When people say this it always tells me that they actually do. I have yet to meet a healthy normal male who didn’t watch porn even if just a little.

      Report this comment

      searcher619  
  • Nickallsopp
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:22pm

    Sweet! I knew those women were attractive for a reason.

    Report this comment

    Nickallsopp  
  • Noah_fing-whey
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:16pm

    I’m not sure that screaming “Oh my gawd! Oh my gawd!” Is necessarily an indication of an authentic belief in the one true God.

    Report this comment

    Noah_fing-whey  
  • TeresaJ
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:10pm

    And against what standard are they measuring “self esteem” and “body image?” Of course they have to have some measure of crass to do what they do in front of a camera. Being shameless doesn’t equal being right, it equals being unteachable, and in this case, having no standards of decency.

    As to body image, I’m quite sure those “clients” do not want to pay to see something ugly.

    What a rediculous study.

    Report this comment

    TeresaJ  
    • HigherRoad
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:22pm

      Notice also that the average “career” length was three and a half years! My, my! I wonder if they are eligible for full retirement benefits as well?

      Report this comment

      HigherRoad  
  • Guitarcarl
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:10pm

    How do they even quantify that crap?! This is useless dribble. Better body image? More spiritual? What does that even mean? So some drugged, addle brain, porn star says she is spiritual and thinks she is hot and we all should throw out thousands of years of human experience and embrace her depraved lifestyle? Not buying it.

    Report this comment

    Guitarcarl  
  • HigherRoad
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:09pm

    And porn stars aren’t exploited? Hmmm…! Parents, you now have a new standard in which to raise your daughters. Since children are learning everything they “need” to know in Kindergarten (about sex and sexual deviancy, that is), they should be ready! Sick, sick, sick!

    Report this comment

    HigherRoad  
  • jackact
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:03pm

    When will Sandra Flukes first porno movie be released?
    I understand it will be girl-on-girl in order to cut down on Ms. Flukes contraceptive needs.

    Report this comment

    jackact  
    • jackact
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:10pm

      With that thought in mind…..hopefully Ms. Fluke has maintained her close personal relationships with Scarlett Johansen and Jessica Alba.
      :):):):)

      Report this comment

      jackact  
    • stillbombshelterbob
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:15pm

      uh, I think you might have to get the other girl pretty drunk first!

      Report this comment

      stillbombshelterbob  
    • God_Is_Not
      Posted on November 27, 2012 at 1:42pm

      Classless Blaze members stealing juvenile material from Rush Limbaugh.

      Report this comment

      God_Is_Not  
  • llotus
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 12:48pm

    Did this come straight from the Hustelers mouth? Can`t think of the perverts name. Lotus.

    Report this comment

    llotus  
    • THERAPTURCOMES
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 12:57pm

      Another sign is that people whom do evil call what they do good or pose it as self image. They are all on the broad path to destruction as will be soon exposed by the resurrection/rapture http://youtu.be/ahEVxIzlxwo

      Can you imagine a woman doing a three way on set then going outside and trying ti preach the gospel???

      This is delusion at its finest.

      Destruction comes, avoid it by reading and understanding Romans 10:9-10

      Report this comment

      THERAPTURCOMES  
    • SWORD_OF_THE_LORD
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:20pm

      The rapture is a LIE .. For the love of God wake up!

      http://theseason.yolasite.com/

      Report this comment

      SWORD_OF_THE_LORD  
    • THERAPTURCOMES
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 9:21pm

      Sword_of_the_lord

      If you had any Hebraic studies you would know why the pre trib rapture is indeed the truth. Without Hebraic studies you wont understand the Hebrew harvest cycles and why the label of FIST FRUIT is used of Christ.

      Rev 3:10, supports the timing of the resurrection/rapture 1 Thes 4:13-18 & 1 Cor 15:50-55.

      If you call the resurrection a lie then you call Christs resurrection/rapture a lie. He is the FIRST FRUIT of the resurrection/rapture

      There are three distinct phases to a Hebraic harvest cycle. Can you tell me what they are???

      Phase on is complete with the first fruit harvest and is why Christ is labeled FIRST FRUIT. Can you explain what the first fruit harvest according to ancient Hebraic harvest customs?

      If you cannot answer this question or explain why Christ is a first fruit or anything about a Hebraic harvest cycle then you need to stop calling Christ a liar

      Report this comment

      THERAPTURCOMES  
  • willingtoupe
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 12:46pm

    They are also more honest than the average woman( Married and Unmarried ).

    Which is why when I travel to California or Miami, I am willingtoupe for their hour of blessing of their time when doing their side jobs off camera.

    Report this comment

    willingtoupe  
  • DEMOCRATS.ARE.EVIL
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 12:36pm

    These porn stars are not going to allow themselves to be seen in a bad light. They’re going to put on a happy face and tell you life is great, because they don’t want you judging them. Other studies have shown them to having high substance abuse rates. I wouldn’t trust this “survey” at all.

    Report this comment

    DEMOCRATS.ARE.EVIL  
  • Owt_Raged
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 12:33pm

    Shouting “Oh God” 30 or 40 times a day during filming does not make you more spiritual.

    Report this comment

    Owt_Raged  
  • kickagrandma
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 12:33pm

    I wasn’t interviewed, were you?

    MORE LIES FROM THE LYING MEDIA.

    Guess what satan, we are not willingly turning our children and grandchildren over to you any longer. Yes, many of us were asleep, but by GOD’S GRACE we are awake now. you get your filthy, lying, distorting, malevolent, greedy hands off our families, our children, our grandchildren, our churches, our neighborhoods and our GOD-BLESSED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, right now in JESUS’ MIGHTY NAME, amen.

    P.S. if porn “stars” had good self esteem, that is NOT the profession they would choose. FYI

    Report this comment

    kickagrandma  
  • Cavallo
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 12:31pm

    So… porn stars are ideal women in more ways than.. ha!

    Hi-lar-ious.

    Report this comment

    Cavallo  
  • conservativeblackman
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 12:29pm

    This so called study just points out how the absence of morals in this country makes those who disobey God feel alright with it.

    Report this comment

    conservativeblackman  
    • Legion5
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:04pm

      A very true statement

      Report this comment

      Legion5  
    • ldomin
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 3:18pm

      I totally agree with you. They may believe in God but faith without action is nothing. Your way of life is the true reflection of your faith. Otherwise, they are just hypocrites.

      Report this comment

      ldomin  
    • PaxInVeritate
      Posted on November 26, 2012 at 3:19pm

      Amen!

      Report this comment

      PaxInVeritate  
  • oldguy49
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 12:27pm

    they do seem to have more religious experiances that most women…………sorry

    Report this comment

    oldguy49  
  • MiCurmudgeon
    Posted on November 26, 2012 at 12:26pm

    Why should this surprise anyone? Obama is a prime example of the male equivalent.

    Report this comment

    MiCurmudgeon  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In