Developing: Pakistani Plane Escorted by UK Fighter Jets — 2 Men Arrested
Doc Thompson’s 24-hour radio marathon, ‘#24forok,’ continues until 9 am ET — Listen Live!
Shock Study: Female Porn Stars Have Higher Self-Esteem, Better Body Image & Are More Spiritual Than Other Women
There have been some odd stories about porn stars emerging of late. In October, retired adult film star Ron Jeremy made a fascinating claim while speaking at a Michigan church — that the majority of porn stars believe in God. While this was startling enough in its own regard, a new study from “The Journal of Sex Research” has also come to some noteworthy conclusions. Among them, that women in the porn industry allegedly have a better body image and higher self-esteem than females working in other, less-sexual careers.
Naturally, the results will be disputed, but they certainly raise a number of questions. Conventional wisdom has been that those individuals working in sex-centric careers have lower self-esteem than other women as a result of being exploited. In this particular study, entitled, “Pornography Actresses: An Assessment of the Damaged Goods Hypothesis,” researchers who compared 177 porn stars with women in other careers found quite the opposite.

Former porn star Jenna Jameson (Photo Credit: AP)
“Stereotypes of those involved in adult entertainment have been used to support or condemn the industry and to justify political views on pornography, although the actual characteristics of actresses are unknown because no study on this group of women has been conducted,” an excerpt from the study reads. “Some descriptions of actresses in pornography have included attributes such as drug addiction, homelessness, poverty, desperation, and being victims of sexual abuse.”
According to Inquisitr, researchers found that female porn stars were also not more likely to encounter sexual abuse during their childhood years when compared with other American women. The Toronto Sun continues:
The study…said it found no evidence to support the “damaged goods hypothesis” that actresses involved in the porn industry come from desperate backgrounds. Rather, the researchers found the women have higher self-esteem, a better quality of life and body image, and are more positive, with greater levels of spirituality.
The study was conducted by researchers at Pennsylvania’s Shippensburg University, Texas Woman’s University and the Adult Industry Medical Healthcare Foundation.

Adult film star Ron Jeremy, left, signs his book for Jean Austin of Canoga Park, Calif., during the Adult Video Network Expo, Thursday, Jan. 19, 2012, in Las Vegas. Credit: AP
The actresses who were included in the sample had all been paid to work in at least one porn film. They ranged from ages 18 to 50 and, according to the Sun, had an average career length of at least three and a half years. While about four in 10 were single, more than one-third reported being either married or in a serious relationship.
While some may argue that the sample size is too low (after all, 177 isn’t necessarily a large pool, especially when it comes to scientific research), the results are startling.
–
Related:
Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.

















































































































Comments (102)
OniKaze
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:58pmI may be in the minority here on the Blaze, but I do not see a problem with pornography (when responsibly consumed).
While I don’t think one should waste all of their time consuming porn, a occasional viewing I don’t think hurts anything when it is viewed responsibly by adults. Does it mess with Kids? I guess it could depending on the age of exposure, but I don’t think Porn is the great evil that many people on the blaze say it is…
When I was in college, a few of my friends were in the “adult entertainment” industry, and while they were un-adversely effected by it, some of their “co-workers” were not… So While I will say it is not for everyone, I don’t think it is the bad thing that many say it is… The Modern adult industry is not what it was 15 to 20 years ago, and it has not been able to shake that old stigma (and likely never will).
I am not shocked that many women from today’s “industry” are not like what they were 20 years ago.. Back then porn was “un-regulated” and un-restrained, where thankfully now, many (but not all) of the shady things that used to happen no longer do…
My stance on Porn is simply this: If you like pornography, consume it responsibly.. If you don’t like pornography, DO NOT CONSUME IT..
Simple right?
Report this comment
HigherRoad
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 2:32pmThis is just another rung on the ladder of descent into moral decay. Yes, I know these things have been around since the beginning of time, but the more passive and tolerant we become toward evil and depravity in our society, the less chance we have of regaining our moral conscience. Look at the platform for the Democratic Convention–abortion, homosexuality, free birth control, and rejection of God. As a result, we got dishonest election results and a president who lies and deceives.
Report this comment
LetUsReason
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 2:34pmI suppose one could say the same for any vice, right?
Example: I don’t have a problem with abortion. If you decide to abort, do it responsibly. If you don’t believe in abortion, then don’t do it.
I imagine that you could use this template for just about anything, including pornography. The problem today is that people like you say, “Sin is sin only if you believe that it’s sin. What’s sin for me may not be sin for you, and vice versa.” Sin responsibly, you say. Interesting outlook. The term for this philosophical belief is moral relativism. It is present in the decline of any great civilization and is rampant today.
Report this comment
CoGod
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 4:21pmYes simple. And so is “You can enter God’s Kingdom only through the narrow gate. The highway to hell is broad, and its gate is wide for the many who choose that way.”
If you say it is OK then great. If the majority say OK then great! As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.
Report this comment
TheSword
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 4:29pmWell…if you’re a Christian then there is no denying that pornography is wrong and a sin equal to adultery. Jesus specifically says “Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.” (Matt 5:27-28) Pornography is specifically made to satisfy people’s lustful desires. Thus, you must either admit that it is a sin to be abstained from or you must call Jesus a liar. I wouldn’t recommend the second one.
If you’re not a Christian, then what I just said will probably confuse or anger you, but that doesn’t make it any less true. Pornography is wrong no matter how you look at it.
Report this comment
glckgrl
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 5:06pmI disagree, respectfully. I have many friends who are former dancers and “stars” — most of them had abuse and violent backgrounds. Without fail, all of them became spiritually bankrupt, hooked on booze and/or drugs to be able to live with what they do for a living. There’s been no cleanup in Georgia or Florida or South Carolina, where they are obliged to show in a disgusting manner. I know men who would choose a video over their wives. Read Linda Lovelace’s autobiography for an accurate portrayal. Bless those poor girls.
Report this comment
athiest-infedel
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 5:56pmOniKaze well said, my wife and I used to watch porn and go to strip clubs until the girls became younger than my daughter, then the creapy factor set in and we just had our 21 anniversery.
Report this comment
DeniseR55
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 6:02pmI think it’s sad that to get sexually excited people have to watch other people have sex before they can MAKE LOVE to the person they supposedly love. You are the watchers really making love too, the porn female star or porn male star, because they are the ones who got the person watching sexually excited? Porn is demoralizing and undermines the personal relationship of those who watch, whether they want to admit it or not. It robs them of intimacy, which is the foundation of any relationship..
Report this comment
HigherRoad
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 7:05pmDENIS55: You are so right. Since the “turnover” in the industry is every 3-1/2 years according to the article, how can a wife expect to compete with the constant new crop? The porn stars are glamorized and made to appear flawless (I would assume; I’m not a viewer). That means that the porn viewer will be less tolerant of the natural flaws in the human body. God admonishes a man to be faithful to the wife of his youth (Proverbs 5).
Report this comment
FJR-Tiger
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 7:13pmIf you don’t object to your mother, sister, or daughter “performing” in the biz, at least you’re intellectually honest. Otherwise, you might want to put yourself in the shoes of a parent who’s daughter is in the pornography industry and the heartbreak they must endure to allow you to “responsibly” consume the product.
Report this comment
black9897
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 8:13pmI get what you’re saying, and maybe from a non-Christian point of view you’d have a point. Even so I’d say stay away from it all together. If someone is married then they should be looking at each other and not anyone else. Granted, some couples watch and have no problem with it.
People talk so much about having the “right” to have an abortion in any case and it’s some war on women’s rights, etc. Well what about porn? I mean it objectifies and degrades women. I really don’t see any good that comes from porn. That’s just me though.
Report this comment
girlnurse
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 9:20pmSo if you have a mother and/or daughter/sister…how would you like guys getting off on looking at their naked body and wanting to rape them right there on the spot? Its stuff like this that contributes to child abuse, pedophilia, rape, and murder. God made sex and the way He wants us to have it is between a married man and woman…He has his reasons for everything and besides do you know how many marriages are being ruined right now in the US by men/women who are hooked on online porn???? It’s staggering and I have first hand experience that it ruins families and hurts children.
Report this comment
sillyfreshness
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 11:14pmI would doubt anyone would have low self esteem who would get naked and partake in sex acts for everyone in the world to see. To the contrary, one would have to be very vain.
Report this comment
Vegasdad702
Posted on November 27, 2012 at 3:04am@Onikaze- WELL SAID!!! This is what separates conservatives from Libertarians. The failure of the conservative right, is in the hypocrisy of claiming to stand for freedom, as long as it doesn’t fly in the face of their religious beliefs. Seems that if God is in control, and God wants us to find and follow him, we should be free to figure it out on our own. Forcing someone to be moral only creates rebellion. Gods message and kingdom can’t be forced, it must be found by the INDIVIDUAL. I grew out of these habits from asking moral questions in my own life. NOT because of some stigma or religious bigotry. This is where the right fails. EVERYTHING they/we stand for is righteous, just the ability to let people figure it out for themselves eludes so many. :( You either believe in FREEDOM or you DON”T. I refuse to play the hypocrisy game on what people should be free to do and not to do. I do not pretend to know what is right for anyone besides myself, and I am not so arrogant in my faith to pretend I KNOW God’s plan for another as well. Interesting study. I find it funny that there are so many arrogant, and paranoid remarks that followed your comment. Not sure if you are a Libertarian, but I agree with your take on this topic. Well said. God Bless
Report this comment
black9897
Posted on November 27, 2012 at 1:03pm@VEGAS
I don’t think anyone is saying someone doesn’t have the choice or shouldn’t have the choice (unless you’re Rick Santorum) just that it’s not a wise choice to make. It’s something that’s easy to abuse and usually results in very bad outcomes. Even if not abused from a biblical standpoint it would still be wrong. I most certainly agree that God’s message cannot be forced and must be willingly accepted. A lot of people forget that.
Report this comment
LetUsReason
Posted on November 27, 2012 at 6:17pm@ VEGASDAD702
I’m all for hands-off government, like you are. But where does it end? Some say there is a fine line between true libertarianism and anarchy. So you must be for abortions, too, right? Because who are you (as a libertarian) to say the government should or should not let someone have an abortion? Then…if you support that, you must also support murder. True? Who is the government to legislate my choice to kill someone? See where this is headed? Libertarianism in its truest sense is disastrous, and it destroys the one thing you say you stand for–liberty. In order for liberty to exist, you MUST have laws. The trick is to set up the kind of government where its laws only support (not diminish) those freedoms. Does the kite’s string keep the kite aloft, or does it restrict it from flying even higher? The string is our laws, and the kite is our country. Libertarians say cut the string. Do it, and the kite crashes.
Report this comment
Vegasdad702
Posted on November 27, 2012 at 6:27pm@Black- Spot on point of view. I agree with what you are saying very much. :) The only point we disagree on is that “others’ in this thread do want to force and impose “their” religious beliefs upon those who wish to work it out for themselves as INDIVIDUALS. Thank you for the comment. :)
Report this comment
Vegasdad702
Posted on November 27, 2012 at 6:54pm@Letusreason- Well, I see you point, but if I were to follow your model of thinking I could easily say the Conservatism is a thin line from Fascism, if Libertarianism is a thin line from Anarchy. Given the choice between Fascism and Anarchy… I think im gonna go with Anarchy. But truth be told I would NEVER settle for either I would always fight for LIBERTY. Now on to the Abortion question. If you would like my opinion on this its simple. I believe life begins at conception. I believe both religion and science support this logic. I also realize that I didn’t always think this way, and regardless of laws or pop culture my opinion was never really swayed much when compared to PERSONAL experiences, like friends, and personal experiences when faced with this topic. The act and process of abortion is here. It is NOT going away. No law, no restrictions, not amount of force will EVER remove it from our society. Even if new laws were established prohibiting it, the level of science and medicine would still continue regardless of how I felt PERSONALLY. I believe EVERYTHING is GODS plan. Meaning EVERYTHING has purpose. EVERY INDIVIDUAL must decide for THEMSELVES, and live with their actions forever after. It is not mine or yours to control. Also, when we speak of murder. Is one who commits murder automatically damned? Are they not allowed forgiveness in the eyes of God? And doesn’t that redemption lie ONLY in a PERSONAL relationship with God and themselves? answer- GOD & INDIVIDUAL
Report this comment
Vegasdad702
Posted on November 27, 2012 at 7:04pm@Letusreason- Also I would like to simplify my answer a bit. Libertarians believe in three main things- LIFE, LIBERTY, and THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS. ANYTHING that robs someone of their rights like Abortion or murder is WRONG. I just don’t believe I have the right to FORCE someone into thinking just like me. I believe MOST people will eventually figure it out on their own. WHO AM I TO ROB THEM OF THAT?? I didn’t always understand this basic principle and I DO think LEGALY we need to define when our rights begin. WHEN do my rights promised by the Declaration of Independence begin?? We as a country SHOULD define this promise and right LEGALLY. I think that would solve a lot of this debate between Libertarians and Conservatives. Until then, I fear our kite maybe stuck in a power line! LOL thank you and God Bless. :) :) :)
Report this comment
black9897
Posted on November 27, 2012 at 10:58pm@VEGAS
Thank you sir.
@LETUS
To add to what VEGAS said. Being a Libertarian doesn’t mean you think people should be free to violate others rights. Granted, on the party platform they think it should be left up to the women. Thus why I don’t’ like putting myself into a box, even if it’s Libertarian. I only pick that because it matches most of my beliefs (and most of our founders).
The line that you draw is very simple and was really meant to be this way from the start..and that is, does it violate someone’s rights and or cause damage? I know there might be some iffy ones that are in a grey area, but for the most part this can be used. Thus why abortion is murder. As much as I would like to see it illegal, I’m not sure that will happen. More importantly we must focus on how to cut down on the number of abortions no matter if it’s legal or illegal.
Report this comment
LetUsReason
Posted on November 29, 2012 at 2:15pm@ BLACK and VEGAS
Good points, and I think we probably agree on most things. Like I said, I tend to lean libertarian. Like you, if the pendulum has to swing to either Fascism or Anarchy, I choose anarchy. We’re just haggling over the “grey area”, as Black put it.
Report this comment
searcher619
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:57pmIs that why so many of them get a crap-load of cosmetic surgery?
Report this comment
FalseFactBob
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:55pmFun Fact: Females got introduced into tho porno industry 1hr after the first moving picture was invented infact that was the motivation for the invention of the moving picture. Even though female porn stars are happier and less self concious of them selves it is short lived because of AIDS. 100% of female porn stars are unhappy and very self concious after getting AIDS. But when asked they admit to being very happy and not at all self concious before getting AIDS
Report this comment
theotherberean
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:40pmYou can be spiritual without being Christian.
World English Dictionary
spiritual (ˈspɪrɪtjʊəl)
— adj
1. relating to the spirit or soul and not to physical nature or matter; intangible
2. of, relating to, or characteristic of sacred things, the Church, religion, etc
3. standing in a relationship based on communication between the souls or minds of the persons involved: a spiritual father
4. having a mind or emotions of a high and delicately refined quality
— n
5. See ***** spiritual
6. ( often plural ) the sphere of religious, spiritual, or ecclesiastical matters, or such matters in themselves
7. the spiritual the realm of spirits
Report this comment
brother_ed
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 2:51pm@THEOTHERBEREAN
My thoughts exactly!
I would also argue that if they were to interview the hundreds of thousands of other women in the porn business (dancers, prostitutes, etc.) they might find a little different answer.
It’s one thing to agree to be in a movie with Ron Jeremy, and quite another to deal with the clientele these other girls have to deal with just to put food on their table.
Also, like any other vice, it looks fun – and may even BE fun for a while – then the bottom falls out and your ‘friends’ are nowhere to be found.
Report this comment
hi
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:38pmThe true test is to ask people if they want their daughter to grow up to be a porn star.
Report this comment
Southernsoul
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 4:46pmor a waitress at Waffle House. What a moronic argument.
Report this comment
Chuck Stein
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 10:08pm@ Southersoul
How is that “moronic” to consider someone close to you in that situation? Seems like a very good way to evaluate if it is “good” or “bad.” Do you really see no difference between being an “actress” in a porn movie and being a waitress in a Waffle House? If so, your labeling something “moronic” is of particular irony.
Report this comment
Vegasdad702
Posted on November 27, 2012 at 3:22amThe problem with this question is it is a tyrannical one. “ask if THEY would want THEIR daughter to be a porn star”. UMM Shouldn’t that really be up to the daughter and NO ONE ELSE???
Report this comment
Chuck Stein
Posted on November 27, 2012 at 4:20am@ Vegasdad702
As I read the question, the emphasis would seem to be: “if they WANT their daughter to grow up to be a porn star”. “Want” has to do with desires and feelings, not force, command or “tyranny.” Maybe HI could clarify.
Report this comment
BenFrank1791
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:37pmThe women at the well ? Really ?
Report this comment
red1
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:33pmI suspect this study is accurate for the porn stars they surveyed. Its accuracy for the whole population of porn stars seems unlikely to me. I have observed that successful porn stars, like Jameson, tend to be strong, confident women. I suspect that successful porn stars were the only porn stars they studied. The vast majority of women who have worked in porn are not as successful as Jameson. I would wager that Jameson would have been successful in anything she did. I think most women who work in porn in fact do have pyschological and emotional issues and have probably suffered some abuse in their lives, do lack self-esteem, and engage in self-destructive behavior.
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:28pmWhere is R0G4TUM_2012 on this article? I’m sure that he could tell everybody here who expressed an opinion how they are wrong, all while patting himself on the back. Maybe he even orchestrated the “survey” that came to this conclusion.
Report this comment
Inkbottle
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:27pmEven the demons believe-and tremble.
James 2:19b
Report this comment
Hoax And Chains
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:23pmI do not buy, rent, or watch these films. That said, what I want someone to explain to me is, for the money these women willingly sign on for, how are they being exploited? What about the men? Are they not also “exploited”? It’s like saying the women in Sports Illustrated’s Swim Suit issues are being exploited… really? Some people have come out of that industry rejecting their past and feeling sorry for it. Still, others do not. Statistically, if the numbers are crunched right, questions are neutral, and the samples are selected without predetermined factors, 177 people can give a relatively accurate inference to the population in the adult film industry.
Report this comment
searcher619
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 2:05pmI don’t get why you felt you have to tell us that you don’t watch these films. What did that have to do with the rest of your comment? When people say this it always tells me that they actually do. I have yet to meet a healthy normal male who didn’t watch porn even if just a little.
Report this comment
Nickallsopp
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:22pmSweet! I knew those women were attractive for a reason.
Report this comment
Noah_fing-whey
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:16pmI’m not sure that screaming “Oh my gawd! Oh my gawd!” Is necessarily an indication of an authentic belief in the one true God.
Report this comment
Hoax And Chains
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:24pmNeither is standing in a church saying, “Praise You Lord, Praise You Lord”.
Report this comment
TeresaJ
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:10pmAnd against what standard are they measuring “self esteem” and “body image?” Of course they have to have some measure of crass to do what they do in front of a camera. Being shameless doesn’t equal being right, it equals being unteachable, and in this case, having no standards of decency.
As to body image, I’m quite sure those “clients” do not want to pay to see something ugly.
What a rediculous study.
Report this comment
HigherRoad
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:22pmNotice also that the average “career” length was three and a half years! My, my! I wonder if they are eligible for full retirement benefits as well?
Report this comment
Guitarcarl
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:10pmHow do they even quantify that crap?! This is useless dribble. Better body image? More spiritual? What does that even mean? So some drugged, addle brain, porn star says she is spiritual and thinks she is hot and we all should throw out thousands of years of human experience and embrace her depraved lifestyle? Not buying it.
Report this comment
Southerner01
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 4:41pmThe word is drivel.
Report this comment
HigherRoad
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:09pmAnd porn stars aren’t exploited? Hmmm…! Parents, you now have a new standard in which to raise your daughters. Since children are learning everything they “need” to know in Kindergarten (about sex and sexual deviancy, that is), they should be ready! Sick, sick, sick!
Report this comment
jackact
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:03pmWhen will Sandra Flukes first porno movie be released?
I understand it will be girl-on-girl in order to cut down on Ms. Flukes contraceptive needs.
Report this comment
jackact
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:10pmWith that thought in mind…..hopefully Ms. Fluke has maintained her close personal relationships with Scarlett Johansen and Jessica Alba.
:):):):)
Report this comment
stillbombshelterbob
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:15pmuh, I think you might have to get the other girl pretty drunk first!
Report this comment
God_Is_Not
Posted on November 27, 2012 at 1:42pmClassless Blaze members stealing juvenile material from Rush Limbaugh.
Report this comment
llotus
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 12:48pmDid this come straight from the Hustelers mouth? Can`t think of the perverts name. Lotus.
Report this comment
THERAPTURCOMES
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 12:57pmAnother sign is that people whom do evil call what they do good or pose it as self image. They are all on the broad path to destruction as will be soon exposed by the resurrection/rapture http://youtu.be/ahEVxIzlxwo
Can you imagine a woman doing a three way on set then going outside and trying ti preach the gospel???
This is delusion at its finest.
Destruction comes, avoid it by reading and understanding Romans 10:9-10
Report this comment
SWORD_OF_THE_LORD
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:20pmThe rapture is a LIE .. For the love of God wake up!
http://theseason.yolasite.com/
Report this comment
THERAPTURCOMES
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 9:21pmSword_of_the_lord
If you had any Hebraic studies you would know why the pre trib rapture is indeed the truth. Without Hebraic studies you wont understand the Hebrew harvest cycles and why the label of FIST FRUIT is used of Christ.
Rev 3:10, supports the timing of the resurrection/rapture 1 Thes 4:13-18 & 1 Cor 15:50-55.
If you call the resurrection a lie then you call Christs resurrection/rapture a lie. He is the FIRST FRUIT of the resurrection/rapture
There are three distinct phases to a Hebraic harvest cycle. Can you tell me what they are???
Phase on is complete with the first fruit harvest and is why Christ is labeled FIRST FRUIT. Can you explain what the first fruit harvest according to ancient Hebraic harvest customs?
If you cannot answer this question or explain why Christ is a first fruit or anything about a Hebraic harvest cycle then you need to stop calling Christ a liar
Report this comment
willingtoupe
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 12:46pmThey are also more honest than the average woman( Married and Unmarried ).
Which is why when I travel to California or Miami, I am willingtoupe for their hour of blessing of their time when doing their side jobs off camera.
Report this comment
DEMOCRATS.ARE.EVIL
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 12:36pmThese porn stars are not going to allow themselves to be seen in a bad light. They’re going to put on a happy face and tell you life is great, because they don’t want you judging them. Other studies have shown them to having high substance abuse rates. I wouldn’t trust this “survey” at all.
Report this comment
searcher619
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 2:07pmPlenty of porn starts in the past have given candid interviews where they described not so happy childhoods.
Report this comment
deeberj
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 2:32pmYep.
Report this comment
Owt_Raged
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 12:33pmShouting “Oh God” 30 or 40 times a day during filming does not make you more spiritual.
Report this comment
DEMOCRATS.ARE.EVIL
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 12:45pmGood one.
Report this comment
EdtheK
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:00pmThough the same thing, and then almost choked on my lunch when I read your comment.
Report this comment
kickagrandma
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 12:33pmI wasn’t interviewed, were you?
MORE LIES FROM THE LYING MEDIA.
Guess what satan, we are not willingly turning our children and grandchildren over to you any longer. Yes, many of us were asleep, but by GOD’S GRACE we are awake now. you get your filthy, lying, distorting, malevolent, greedy hands off our families, our children, our grandchildren, our churches, our neighborhoods and our GOD-BLESSED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, right now in JESUS’ MIGHTY NAME, amen.
P.S. if porn “stars” had good self esteem, that is NOT the profession they would choose. FYI
Report this comment
AbrahamsSheepdog
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 12:56pmGo Grandma!!! Eve must smile for you. God Love ya.
Report this comment
Cavallo
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 12:31pmSo… porn stars are ideal women in more ways than.. ha!
Hi-lar-ious.
Report this comment
conservativeblackman
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 12:29pmThis so called study just points out how the absence of morals in this country makes those who disobey God feel alright with it.
Report this comment
Legion5
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 1:04pmA very true statement
Report this comment
ldomin
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 3:18pmI totally agree with you. They may believe in God but faith without action is nothing. Your way of life is the true reflection of your faith. Otherwise, they are just hypocrites.
Report this comment
PaxInVeritate
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 3:19pmAmen!
Report this comment
oldguy49
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 12:27pmthey do seem to have more religious experiances that most women…………sorry
Report this comment
MiCurmudgeon
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 12:26pmWhy should this surprise anyone? Obama is a prime example of the male equivalent.
Report this comment
i have black immunity
Posted on November 26, 2012 at 12:34pmOweblamer and the Democratic Party’s definition of compromise: you change your position and agree with ours.
Report this comment