TheBlaze TV

‘Real News’: Syrian Conflict Continues, Will the International Community Intervene?

With rebels closing in on President Bashar al-Assad’s location, the Syrian Army launched war planes pummeling the suburbs of the capital city Damascus Wednesday.  There are reports that government forces are weakening as the rebels have become much stronger strategically, and Assad is said to be possibly investigating asylum.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has come out to say that a desperate Assad regime could use chemical weapons soon, if the weapons are not obtained by another dangerous group vying for power in Syria.

On ‘Real News’ Wednesday the panel discussed the Assad regime’s final stand, and whether the situation could escalate to a point where the U.S. or U.N. steps in. Watch a clip of Buck Sexton breaking down the Syria situation below:

Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.

Comments (14)

  • LoneStarGigger
    Posted on December 6, 2012 at 12:48am

    Why should the international community intervene? Just for once can’t WE let muslims kill as many muslims as they want to?
    It’s a win for us. Not one American life is worth anything over in those hell holes. Let’em go at it until there is too few of them to go at it any more,

    Report this comment

    LoneStarGigger  
    • sillyfreshness
      Posted on December 6, 2012 at 12:59am

      The only thing I can figure out why this whole Syria is front and center in the media is because Syria is the last blockade for a total Islamic caliphate in the Middle East. I guess our government wants a caliphate there, so they want the current Syria regime out of the picture. I can’t tell you why the US government wants an Islamic caliphate there, but they do and our “chosen people” controlled Marxist Media is right there to spread propaganda to get all Americans on board with attacking Syria. Now we are supposed to believe Syria is going to use chemical/biological/nuclear weapons. Even if they do, it’s none of our business. There is more to this story than meets the eye.

      Report this comment

      sillyfreshness  
  • leonardo44
    Posted on December 6, 2012 at 12:09am

    Assad is an incredibly dangerous, desperate man, it’s impossible to predict just how bad this situation in Syria will get.

    Report this comment

    leonardo44  
  • Country_of_Arizona
    Posted on December 5, 2012 at 9:58pm

    You mean the UN getting involved? Come on Bucky, you CIA rascal, they are to busy micromanaging our lifes. I checked with the Jet stream the syrian/iraqi sarin gas won’t hit us but China, Iraq, Iran, pakistan, india should watch out. That will eliminate enough of the population to end the Agenda 21 project. No I think the UN will most likely be the cheerleaders for ASSAD.

    Why use RED as the optima color of the like—I thoughtthey liked the White lines????

    Report this comment

    Country_of_Arizona  
  • NickyLouse
    Posted on December 5, 2012 at 9:42pm

    Should we intervene in a country with chemical/ nerve weapon supplies when the rebels are probably Muslims intent on killing Israelis and Americans?

    Report this comment

    NickyLouse  
  • songbird7
    Posted on December 5, 2012 at 9:21pm

    SHUSH !

    do not interrupt the most important thing that the UN is focusing on , and that is the real world threat !

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhWgZu6tcZU

    Report this comment

    songbird7  
  • rickc34
    Posted on December 5, 2012 at 9:14pm

    Hey as long as muslims are just killing other muslims I don’t have any problem. Why put more of our men and women in harms way for these idiots. Let Obama go over there and give a speech or something.

    Report this comment

    rickc34  
  • toomuchgovt
    Posted on December 5, 2012 at 9:14pm

    Why should anyone be involved? Isn’t this their battle? If the people of Syrian want freedom, the only way they will ever truly cherish it is to fight for it themselves. No outside intervention. Keep out UN, Keep out USA, Keep out Russia, China and everyone else. If this was in America, would you want another country coming in? Would you want the UN “helping”? The UN’s help comes with a high price tag, freedom is a responsibility and it is hard. Maybe the people of the middle east are learning what it means to be free and not have things just handed to them. Too bad Americans have forgot about the price of freedom.

    Report this comment

    toomuchgovt  
  • ChiefGeorge
    Posted on December 5, 2012 at 9:12pm

    We are yet once again and on purpose interveining into the affairs of another nation. If Americans had a civil war, I believe this president would do everything in his power to put that uprising down! Don’t believe it? NDAA, recent memo on insider threats etc plus the mindset capturing dear leader as yet another Lincolnesques personality….only doing what is good for us all….yea!

    Report this comment

    ChiefGeorge  
  • lel2007
    Posted on December 5, 2012 at 9:10pm

    What is it that gives the “international community” the right to intervene? Just because we can doesn’t mean we should.

    Report this comment

    lel2007  
    • ChiefGeorge
      Posted on December 5, 2012 at 9:15pm

      Exactly!

      The “Right to Protect” remember?

      Dear leader has already subdued three other Kings. Yemen 30+years, Egypt 30+years and of course Libya 30+plus years of rule by these socalled leaders. Whats one more crony king!

      Report this comment

      ChiefGeorge  
    • FunFunFun
      Posted on December 5, 2012 at 9:28pm

      We don’t have the money, the people, …. we are spreading thin and broke.

      Report this comment

      FunFunFun  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In