Developing: Pakistani Plane Escorted by UK Fighter Jets — 2 Men Arrested
Doc Thompson’s 24-hour radio marathon, ‘#24forok,’ continues until 9 am ET — Listen Live!
Report: Obama ‘Genuinely Conflicted’ Over Whether to Pick Kerry or Rice as Next Sec. of State — Choice Could Come Next Week

Getty Images
President Barack Obama is said to be “genuinely conflicted” over whether he should nominate U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice or Sen. John Kerry to replace Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
Two White House officials told the National Journal that both candidates are still under consideration, though Obama is leaning heavily toward Rice, one of his closest advisers since 2007.
“She and the president are on exactly the same page on all foreign-policy issues,” a White House official said, adding that “it would be clear to foreign leaders that when Susan Rice is speaking she’s speaking for the president.”
But Obama also “really respects John Kerry, who did an amazing job on debate prep. He respects Sen. Kerry as a leading figure in our party.”
Obama told Bloomberg TV on Tuesday no decision has been made yet, but the officials said the announcement could come as soon as next week, the Journal reported.
Rice has come under harsh criticism, primarily by Republicans, for her initial comments calling the deadly terror assault on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya a response to an anti-Islam film. Obama publicly came to her defense last month, saying senators who “go after” Rice have “got a problem with me.”
But according to the Journal, there are other concerns about Rice beyond Libya — whether she is “temperamentally suited for the job” as she reportedly does not take criticism well.
Clinton herself reportedly favors Kerry for her job. The Massachusetts Democrat and Senate Foreign Relations chairman has also been mentioned as a possible nominee to replace Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta.
A serious consideration in nominating Kerry to either post would be whether his vacant Senate seat could be left vulnerable for a Republican challenger, particularly the just-defeated former Sen. Scott Brown.
In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.


















































































































Comments (106)
33sharks
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:23pmdumb and dumber…..
Report this comment
doomytram
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:35pmThe youtube video blamer and The Vietnam Vet! Obozo will stick with his muslim brethren and protect them from the youtube video. Obozo will burn a pallet of bibles to protect his brethren and stop everything if a koran get’s touch in vein.
Report this comment
Gold Coin & Economic News
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:55pmSo thay have a choice between Lurch and The Liar, how about confirming neither?
http://www.isthatbaloney.com/susan-rice-meets-with-3-republican-senators-and-digs-the-libya-hole-even-deeper/
Report this comment
SocialistSlayer
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:55pmYeah,
I can see how he would be torn — Which Idiot do I pick ??? The Black one or the Old Rich One ?????
Report this comment
Dismayed Veteran
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 2:04pmYouTube and Swifty. The cream of the Democratic Party.
Report this comment
jpcomposite
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 2:34pmwhich one is which or are they interchangeable?
Report this comment
sleepnomore
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 2:35pmyeah, such a choice, liar and liar. He gets me-hiding his boat for taxes I think, and he and his wife are RICH, and RICHER! No choice there.
Report this comment
HumbleMan
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 2:57pmWhat a joke. I don’t know which would be worse. It’s a real toss-up. Oh wait … maybe there’s someone who could actually do the job.
Report this comment
johnpaulkuchtajr
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 3:00pmOh, the Ayatollah Obama is pulling a Bill Clinton and will be able to sweep Fast and Furious, Benghazi, the economy, et al, off the table by jumping into the war on Syria. The Secretary of State, whomever he chooses, will necessarily have to be a consummate liar.
And, my friends, you have no idea what sort of hell Obama is about to unleash for us to endure while he vacations in Hawaii. The Russians and Iran jump nasty into the fray and gas goes to $20.00 per usg when you can find it. Food shortages, water supplies hit by jihadist cells, you name it. Yep, he’s going to fundamentally transform this nation all right.
Report this comment
pavepaws
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 3:08pmHow about neither?
Report this comment
The-Monk
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 3:15pmWell, take a chance on losing a seat in the Senate or having the Clinton/Rice/Obama relationship exposed.
“Ambassador Susan Rice Is Financially Tied To Keystone Pipeline Company”
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/11/29/166166977/ambassador-susan-rice-is-financially-tied-to-keystone-pipeline-company
Report this comment
cmhemphill
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 3:40pmA puppet that throws racial cards or a stale pancake, flat and in need of being tossed out. Great. Just what we need.
I wonder, how long did it take for BHO to get the ventriloquism down just right? He’s so good, he doesn’t even have to be in the same room. The talking points just fly out (of his…ya know).
Report this comment
fixer
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 5:02pmtoo bad he wouldn’t just pick his nose till his head caves in.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 5:10pmLet’s see, do I pick a Benghazi liar, or, do I pick a swift boat liar? Though choice.
Report this comment
SCREW-WINDOWS
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 6:47pmWhats the difference their both traitors to the country.
Report this comment
mikem1969
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:23pmobama and genuine in the same sentece, what an oxymoron.
Report this comment
ArmedAndReallyPissed
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:41pmLMAO……perfect.
Report this comment
Cymry
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:21pmkerry, hands down. lurch has it “owed” to him.
Report this comment
jackact
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:20pmOne thing ‘fo sure.
If Obama picks Rice he’s a racist.
At least that’s what white people got labeled by his MSM when they voted for Romney.
Report this comment
RIGS
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:18pmWHO CARES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Either one is a backside kissing KNUCKEL HEAD.
Report this comment
badswing
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:24pmobviously those that want kerry over rice are racist…is kerry over rice an indian dish?
Report this comment
GBTVFan_Non_American_Overseas
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:18pmThis is just a charade trying to make Barry look good, as he was caring about something important for your country. He doesn´t need to think anything (He can´t anyway). He will do the same he always does: Asking Valerie Jarret, and she will tell him what to do. The fact is he can’t walk and chew gum at the same time.
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:49pmTis quite the conundrum! Which of these one percenters should 0bama chose to fill such a position? Kerry to include his wife’s income are one of the wealthiest families with one occupying a senate seat. We already know where Theresa Hinds-Kerry’s income is from. Now Rice is an almost untold story. She and her husband are worth somewhere between 24 and 40 million and he is heavily invested in that God-awful, dastardly slime that oozes from the core of the earth…..petroleum, oil that is. Their investments are also in with the Keystone Pipeline. So, eenie…….meanie……miney…..MOE! Which evil wealthy person should he chose? Wonder if they get any special Jeff Immelt, GE type deals when it comes to taxes?
Okay, my vote is for Lurch for Sec State. That way somebody else with more compassion for the military might get the SECDEF position. Rice can stand around point that pissed off puss at the UN Congregation as far as I am concerned.
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:17pmTranslation – Headlines: Obama waiting to see which prospect gives the biggest bribe.
Report this comment
Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:11pmIf that means that they will have to visit “safe houses” in desolate locations under threat from attack then perhaps we can find a way for both of them to be Co-Secretaries.
Report this comment
JACKTHETOAD
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:08pmLiar A or liar B…that’s a tough one alright.
Report this comment
cassandra
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:05pmWell lets see Rice who lied to the country about the attack in benghazi or a liberal lying non-patriot who denounced his own country men during the Vietam war typical obummer choices radical or radical
Report this comment
SamIamTwo
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:03pmIn a 2002 op-ed piece in the Washington Post, former Ambassador to Sudan Timothy M. Carney and news contributor Mansoor Ijaz implicated Rice and counter-terrorism czar Richard Clarke in missing an opportunity to neutralize Osama bin Laden while he was still in Sudan in 1996.
Report this comment
rawmilker
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:12pmWhere did Rice aquire all that money? She’s created quite a bit of wealth since working for the govt. Hmmmm…
Report this comment
JACKTHETOAD
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:03pmHow about James Clapper? He always knows what’s going on.
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:59pmJACKTHETOAD, Bwahahahahahahahahahaha! Excellent choice in my opinion. If anybody ever had that typical deer in the headlights look on his face, it is Clapper. Totally lost when answering questions…..no…..sorry, when asked even the simplest questions by the MSM. Clapper would also make for an excellent Czar Of Clowns.
Report this comment
JACKTHETOAD
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:02pmDon King.
Report this comment
ArmedAndReallyPissed
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:02pmYeah man….so hard to make up my mind……..what to do, oh what to do………do i choose the pasty old white man or the sexy momma that make my mich look like bigfoot………Which one…….which one………OK. sexy in, pasty out. Man, i spent more time thinking about that than i did about the Benghazi Murd…….oops…….Sssshhhhhhhhh.
Report this comment
Silversmith
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 12:59pmThey are exactly the same. We lose either way
Silversmith
Report this comment
MGrilla
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 12:59pm2 intellectual traitors to the US. Their total lack of accountability, future foreign affairs should be a breeze for either one of them.
Report this comment
CWPrequired
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 12:58pmWouldn’t he be a racist if he didn’t pick Rice?
Report this comment
Dkoonz
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:11pmNot if it was White Rice.
Report this comment
freedomisasfreedomdoes
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 12:57pmMr. Heinz Ketchup is better (out of the 2)
Report this comment
MGrilla
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:01pmThere is no better in equals.
Report this comment
FalseFactBob
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 12:56pmFun Fact: When asked Hillary also said “We already had a great Sec. of State Named Rice and her first name was Condi, and all though Kerry did serve in Vietnam I believe the best choice to replace me and has the most incommon with every one in this administration is Bashar al-Assad, Its win win he can step down as president of Syria and become Sec. Of State.Why should he be limited to Syria if we can implement his policies which are our policies not only in the middle east but all over the world. Like I said its what our administration would like to see happen.”
Report this comment
DarthMims
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 12:55pmI thought they already picked Gus Malzahn.
Report this comment
spfoam1
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 12:54pmObama will pick the one likely to be the most damaging to the nation. The question is which one is worse, the turd or the polished turd?
Report this comment
JACKTHETOAD
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 12:52pmI don’t know about Rice. Kerry was in Vietnam, you know.
Report this comment
Marci
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 12:50pmHe isn’t “conflicted”. He is merely tallying up a score sheet and weighing the advantages. With “delicate flower” Rice, he has so much more advantage on ensuring she never is questioned now that the Looney Left has thrown down the gauntlet and declared any questioning of her sexist and racist. Welcome to Obama’s post-racial America. The new way is that you shall not question any leader of color or you shall be labeled racist. Granted—most of us do not care what he labels us, but his army of idiot bots do, and he has shown he is willing and able to dispatch them (SEIU-Kenneth Gladney, e.g. OWS, lawlessness) and allow them to attack without consequence.
Report this comment
dnha14
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:54pmBut it will be OK to question Kerry because he’s rich. Oh wait a minute. There are no rich Democrats, right?
Report this comment
RightUnite
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 12:49pmOh, I’m sure he’s losing sleep over it….
Report this comment
MDECKER
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 1:16pmSure he is! He’s most concerned if John winds up in the Middle East, John may get lost in a herd of grazing camels.
Report this comment
SUNTZU
Posted on December 5, 2012 at 12:46pmSusan is my pick
She know how to take and carry out orders.
Report this comment