Blake Page, a former West Point cadet, quit attending the prominent U.S. military academy this week, citing Christian proselytizing and the promotion of prayers and religion. Just shy of graduation, which was just months away, the 24-year-old is now speaking out against faith in the armed forces. He made the shocking announcement that he is leaving the institution on The Huffington Post.
Blake described his current situation as follows:
As I write this, I am five months from graduation. After nearly three and a half years here, there is no reason to suspect that I would be in any way incapable of completing the final requirements and walking across the stage in Michie Stadium with diploma in hand in another 174 days. Choosing to resign at this point also carries significant risk. The Army may seek recoupment in the form of about $200-300k which I will personally owe, or an additional term of up to 5 years of enlisted service. What could possibly compel me to pass over this incredible opportunity in exchange for such harsh penalties?
While there are certainly numerous problems with the developmental program at West Point and all service academies, the tipping point of my decision to resign was the realization that countless officers here and throughout the military are guilty of blatantly violating the oaths they swore to defend the Constitution. These men and women are criminals, complicit in light of day defiance of the Uniform Code of Military Justice through unconstitutional proselytism, discrimination against the non-religious and establishing formal policies to reward, encourage and even at times require sectarian religious participation.
While at West Point, the atheist was heavily involved in campus secularism. He was the president of the West Point Secular Student Alliance, an affiliate for the Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers and the first director of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation. In a resignation letter to West Point officials, he highlighted his intense issues with the infusion of religious sentiment in the military.
“I do not wish to be in any way associated with an institution which willfully disregards the Constitution of the United States of America by enforcing policies which run counter to the same,” he wrote. “Examples of these policies include mandatory prayer, the maintenance of the 3rd Regiment Shield, awarding extra passes to Plebes who take part in religious retreats and chapel choirs, as well as informal policies such as the open disrespect of non-religious new cadets and incentivizing participation in religious activities through the chain of command.”
Following his announcement, he was granted an honorable discharge and told that he will not need to reimburse the cost of his education, as feared in his initial post divulging the situation. Page was medically disqualified this semester from being in the Army as a second lieutenant over clinical depression and anxiety — conditions that he claims have worsened following his father’s suicide.
Watch the former West Point student, who plans to continue activism against religion in the military, describe his plight on CNN:





















































































































Comments (255)
mcsledge
Dec. 6, 2012 at 3:48pmThe removal of the godless from our armed services saves lives.
What kind of commitment does a person bring to the job who has faith in nothing, does not seek power from a higher source, and most of all is offended by others who do have faith and do seek power from a higher source.
Lives may have been saved this very day.
Report this comment
The Third Archon
Dec. 6, 2012 at 6:30pmYou are conflating faith with belief. Faith is belief without evidence, and is always stupid and dangerous–while theist soldiers pray to their God for protection, atheist soldiers fight.
Belief on the other hand is simple acceptance of a claim as true–it may be justified or not.
Report this comment
strawberry411a
Dec. 7, 2012 at 1:00pmOK now I know you are full of it. Obviously Stonewall Jackson, Robert E. Lee and Joshua Chamberlain are fighting CHRISTIAN soldiers who have managed to escape your very narrow attention span. You run on and on and your words mean nothing. Enough Archon. You are so full of yourself it spews forth like crap from a goose. By the way, Chamberlain led the Charge…a BAYONET CHARGE at Little Round TOP… that earned him the Medal of Honor. Please now just shut up. You seem to know just enough to make you dangerous but know so very little about what is really important. A typical lawyer…..student.
Report this comment
BeCrazyTimes
Dec. 6, 2012 at 3:12pmWith the knowledge and the passion he has gained at West Point he can now go on to seek out and correct those religious inequities that are so prevalent in this Nation.
People of faith accept openingly all people everywhere. You don’t even have to agree with them.
This young man seems as though he is heading down a long road of persecuting and prosecuting people of faith. Atheists are far less accepting when it comes to people of faith. You have to agree with them or they will sue you.
Report this comment
1776freedomofspeech
Dec. 6, 2012 at 3:04pmI am glad he is gone.
Report this comment
girlnurse
Dec. 6, 2012 at 2:59pmThis dude sure went through alot to bring his “agenda” to the FLUFF post…..He’s probably gay to boot…give him the das-boot!
Report this comment
biblegeek119
Dec. 6, 2012 at 2:52pmSomeone help me if I misunderstood him:
He wanted to be an “Officer”, to be part of the “Chain of Command” and since he would not make it he decided to leave early (not to waste taxpayers money – how nice).
But, just leaving would not mean anything to anybody, so to get some attention he wrote a letter blaming the bible religion (not Islam OF COURSE) in the institution.
Report this comment
boats48
Dec. 6, 2012 at 2:29pmWhat happens to this guy’s mandatory service now? He’s one semester from graduation, does he get off the hook for serving? He can transfer his credits to a civilian school and graduate with a degree in one or two semesters and he’s off the hook to serve? If that’s the case, he’s more likely a coward than an atheist.
Report this comment
ChrisDiamond
Dec. 6, 2012 at 2:40pmHe was found unfit to commission due to a medical condition, the diagnosis made and agreed upon by enough board-certified medical professionals to end his obligatory service. Hardly the mark of cowardice, but since he disagrees with you, he deserves the presumption of cowardice, right?
Report this comment
Dismayed Veteran
Dec. 6, 2012 at 2:18pmI am glad this man is not leading American soldiers in combat. Not because he is an atheist. Because he does not understand what Duty, Honor, Country means. Without those values he should not be putting anyone in harm’s way.
I had soldiers in my detachment who were very religious, kind of relgious and not religious. I made sure that those who wanted to attend church could when there was a padre around. I just didn’t want them skating. Those who did not worship, I tried to give equivalent downtime. I did this unless our mission was negatively impacted.
Report this comment
HigherRoad
Dec. 6, 2012 at 2:17pmAs the old saying goes, “There are no atheists in the fox holes.” John 15:13 – Greater love has no one than this, that he lay down his life for his friends. No one understands this better than those who serve our country.
Report this comment
seer
Dec. 6, 2012 at 2:15pmThis man does not understand our history, http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/religion/rel04.html
Morality in the Army
Congress was apprehensive about the moral condition of the American army and navy and took steps to see that Christian morality prevailed in both organizations. In the Articles of War, seen below, governing the conduct of the Continental Army (seen above) (adopted, June 30, 1775; revised, September 20, 1776), Congress devoted three of the four articles in the first section to the religious nurture of the troops. Article 2 “earnestly recommended to all officers and soldiers to attend divine services.” Punishment was prescribed for those who behaved “indecently or irreverently” in churches, including courts-martial, fines and imprisonments. Chaplains who deserted their troops were to be court-martialed.
Morality in the Navy
Congress particularly feared the navy as a source of moral corruption and demanded that skippers of American ships make their men behave. The first article in Rules and Regulations of the Navy (below), adopted on November 28, 1775, ordered all commanders “to be very vigilant . . . to discountenance and suppress all dissolute, immoral and disorderly practices.” The second article required those same commanders “to take care, that divine services be performed twice a day on board, and a sermon preached on Sundays.” Article 3 prescribed punishments for swearers and blasphemers: officers were to be fined and common sailors were to be fo
Report this comment
Lt. Hutch
Dec. 6, 2012 at 2:07pmThis cadet needs to realize that attendance to Sunday mass while training, whether it be basic or an academy, is required of every member. The practice is not designed to force a religious belief on the individuals, but rather instill in them the discipline which is hammered into their brains throughout training. It’s part of the process. I’m glad this sally quit, we don’t need such insecure and sensitive people leading our troops.
Report this comment
Hipnip
Dec. 6, 2012 at 2:01pmMikey Weinstein and Military Religious Freedom Foundation strikes again! Beck needs to do an expose’ on this frauds lifework and how he attacks religion from a base funded by the federal taxpayer.
Report this comment
Vilgax
Dec. 6, 2012 at 2:00pmSomebody needs to create a website “I am offended.com”. Let all these idiots go there and rant. That young man is a disgrace to any uniform and I for one feel safer that people like him are not going to become officers. We already have enough leaders with their heads up their…well, you get the idea.
Report this comment
TheGrtDcptn
Dec. 6, 2012 at 1:50pm‘and even **at times** require sectarian religious participation’…
Imagine that…!! I thought atheist loved the word “inclusive”…?!
Meaning of the word…?!
“NOT EXCLUDING any particular groups of people: an inclusive society”…
So forgive me if I don’t sympathize with hypocrites who show NO tolerance for others who happen to also live in their so-called “inclusive society”…pffttt…
Report this comment
MikeMurray
Dec. 6, 2012 at 1:47pmThis is an uplifting story: The Academy has culled one more weak link from the Long Gray Line.
Second thought: When you can’t make goal; create an ailment that draws sympathy. This cadet’s ‘Losers Limp’ (immortalized by Zig Ziglar) sets the course for his life’s trajectory – always having to explain why you eventually turn away from every important ‘huddle’ in your life (not an uplifting thought).
Final thought: Karl Menninger (of the famed family of psychiatrists who founded the renowned Menninger Institute) published “Whatever Became of Sin?.” (1073. New York: Hawthorn Books.) In it, he connects the relationship dots between irreligiosity, criminal behavior and psychiatric decline. I hope he reads it soon. Forty years from now we don’t want to see him walking barefoot in New York just before Christmas.
Fortunately, I can say a prayer for him, since he can’t.
PS: TIME magazine published a feature article two years ago on the USMA. It pegged the value of and Academy degree at ONE MILLION DOLLARS. Merry Christmas mommy and daddy! Get your checkbooks out!
Report this comment
nick e l
Dec. 6, 2012 at 1:47pmGood get out… I wouldn’t want to be in a fox hole with him in a desperate situation
Semper Fi!
Report this comment
iono12345
Dec. 6, 2012 at 1:42pmI’m an atheist, I served and retired from the military with twenty years. This kid is nothing, but an attention whore chicken, just because you’re an atheist doesn’t mean you are not loyal to your country…the guy was looking for an excuse to run and he like many liberals used our shall I say liberal laws to escape his responsibilities.
“he will not need to reimburse the cost of his education,” SiSSY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report this comment
rabblechat
Dec. 6, 2012 at 1:31pmWhich part of the constitution does this guy feel has been violated? The closest thing I can find is in the bill of rights:
The first Amendment states ” Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”
Did the government, or West point pass a law declaring that cadets must be Christian?
If the end up passing a law banning prayers or any other activity associated with religion (which is what this guy wants) then they would be in violation of the first amendment which says “… or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”
Report this comment
The Third Archon
Dec. 6, 2012 at 1:38pmThe part where the military, or a significant number of its officers at least, is convinced it’s a CHRISTIAN institution, not an AMERICAN one–the constitution they are sworn to defend is that of AMERICA, not the Vatican, and not CHRISTIANITY. They don’t take an oath to uphold and defend the BIBLE (though you might think otherwise examining the CONDUCT of many of them). As a famous man once said “No servant can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other.” (Luke 16:13 NIV). (oh the delicious irony).
Report this comment
TheGrtDcptn
Dec. 6, 2012 at 2:22pm(oh the delicious irony)…
Is there no shame for parading one’s stupidity for all to see…?! Perhaps you can buy a CLUE…before you completely destroy capitalism…
Report this comment
The Third Archon
Dec. 6, 2012 at 6:28pm“Is there no shame for parading one’s stupidity for all to see…?!”
I don’t know, I ask theists the same thing all the time.
“Perhaps you can buy a CLUE…before you completely destroy capitalism…”
That would be awfully impressive accomplishment ALL by myself. But I for one wouldn’t be sad to see the current aristocratic plutocracy called “capitalism” bite the dust.
Report this comment
strawberry411a
Dec. 7, 2012 at 1:05pmAmazing archon. Amazing. You skim the surface of everything but you never tell the truth and tell the whole story. The VATICAN???????????????????? You are everywhere, all over the map.
Report this comment
TheGrtDcptn
Dec. 6, 2012 at 1:28pmBuh Bye…good riddance…!!
Report this comment
CanadaRocks
Dec. 6, 2012 at 1:25pmI dont see why you are all sayin he is unfit? Was it not just a gew days ago there was an article here on the blaze that asked if someone who suffers from mental illness should be allowed to own a firearm. The results were an overwhelming yes. So you think that a mentally ill civillian should be able to own and use a firearm but a serviceman suffering from mental illness is unfit. So which is it? Can mentally ill people use guns or not whether in the military or a civillian?
Report this comment
The Third Archon
Dec. 6, 2012 at 1:35pmYou are looking in the WRONG place for logical consistency my friend.
Report this comment
WillG
Dec. 6, 2012 at 1:21pmLet us set the record straight. The Constitution states “Freedom of Religion”. In its entirety anywhere does it state “Freedom from Religion”.
Report this comment
budzy1911
Dec. 6, 2012 at 1:21pmThe military doesn’t need anymore whiny idiot officers. He is doing this so that the white house will step in and make a big deal and force the academy to drop all religion.
America doesn’t need people like him.
Report this comment
rja444
Dec. 6, 2012 at 1:16pmGood, who needs him apparently he was not motivated by defending his country but more by a political agenda. Who needs these self centered atheists anyway. The only thing atheists are interested is forcing their will on everyone else.
Report this comment
randellmd
Dec. 6, 2012 at 1:13pmif this is his reason he should have never signed up in the first place. i think he signed up so he could make noise and be a martyr for the atheist religion of zealot nutjobs that doesn’t have a clue what the Constitution actually says. idiot!
Report this comment
Ducky657
Dec. 6, 2012 at 1:01pmI am amazed by this story for one reason–none of it is true. The military does not promote any particular religion and goes out of its way to be non-religious while providing opportunities for members to worship while away from home. As a former military member I can assure you proselytizing is not allowed on duty and could be cause for dismissal. I had one incident when I was in the military where one person attempted to share the Gospel with a fellow member. Even though I am a Christian I informed this person what he was doing was improper–especially since the other member was junior in rank. In fifteen years this was the only incident so I am confident this is not a problem at West Point or anywhere else. This person got a free education and used a lie to insulate himself from the possibility he would have to serve the requisite five years in the Army and/or the requirement to pay the government back. I wonder why his father committed suicide–just a question? I have seen several people use a myriad of excuses to avoid a military commitment but accusing any service of being religious amazes me. If anything just the opposite was true during the time I served. Even in Officers Training School or Basic Military Training you were not required to attend church services or anything related to religion–PERIOD! I have a niece at West Point who is a sophomore and she says this guy is full of ^%(#. The Army is better off without this guy!
Report this comment
36IDREDLEG
Dec. 6, 2012 at 12:47pmThe mission of the USMA is to develop leaders for the Army, period. A leader cannot be effective without faith as his/her moral center and moral compass. This is the reason that soldiers pray. This Cadet should have been weeded out in his Plebe year. The USMA leadership failed in that regard for not running him off sooner. As the Cadet chose to stay so long, he wasted the Army’s time (and denied another more qualified candidate a much-coveted slot). For this he should have been discharged under “other than honorable conditions” and sent a bill for his education. I say “Good Riddance”.
Report this comment
ChrisDiamond
Dec. 6, 2012 at 2:03pm“A leader cannot be effective without faith as his/her moral center and moral compass.”
If by “faith” you mean faith in the Christian God, then this is little more than an opinion-based assertion. You cannot substantiate this anymore than you could that the moon is actually made of cheese.
“This is the reason that soldiers pray.”
No it isn’t. If every soldier was a leader, then who would do the work? Leaders are recognized and granted additional leadership responsibilities for superior performance, organization, and their ability to motivate others to make a greater contribution to the tasks at hand, or produce a greater effort. Soldiers pray because they believe in God, but I personally know, and have worked with many soldier/sailor/airmen/marine leaders who do not believe in God.
So because they found a medically disqualifying condition that was not manifest when he entered the academy, but that showed up at this point, he should have to repay the cost of his tuition? Hmm… And I suppose that every military person who has been medically discharged 1,2,3,4 etc years after they enlisted for medical conditions that were not manifest when they enlisted should have to pay back their salaries and benefits?
Report this comment
Dismayed Veteran
Dec. 7, 2012 at 10:08amRedLeg
First, thank you for your service. We are brothers-in-arms.
I disagree with you on one point. When a person enlists or is commissioned the oath is to protect our Constitution, not to protect the Bible. Our faith is encompassed in the Soldiers Creed, the NCO Creed and the Army Values.
I can honestly say that the profoundly religious soldiers I command did not demonstrate any more courage that those who were not religious. I do think that the profoundly religious did find more solace than others.
Report this comment