Find Out How This Millionaire & Tech-Tinkerer Transformed a 420-Square-Foot Apartment Into 1,100-Square-Feet Worth of Space
The founder of the environmental website Treehugger.com might be a millionaire, but you probably wouldn’t know it when you consider the square footage of his homesteads.
A member of the tiny house movement, which appeals to various audiences for different reasons, Graham Hill has lived in a trailer, tent, boat and a 350-square-foot apartment. According to a recent profile by Fair Companies’ Kirsten Dirksen, an avid documentarian of the tiny house people who has detailed Hill’s projects before, the tech-tinkerer finished a showcase project in New York City that turned a 420-square-foot apartment into 1,100 square feet of living space.

(Image: YouTube screenshot)
Part of his “LifeEdited” project — a concept that Dirksten reports is one that believes “if you edit your stuff, space and even friends you can have more money, health and happiness” — the SoHo apartment was completed after a design was chosen through a crowd-sourced competition. Although tiny, the space still includes enough room for a 12-person dinner party, two overnight guests, a home office, and theater, according to Dirksen.
With all these capabilities, Hill said he feels like he’s “not sacrificing anything.”
“There’s just something about simplicity and just having less but better stuff that keeps your life … gives you more time,” Hill said.

(Image: YouTube screenshot)
Dirksen explains how it all works together:
[...] walls, drawers and beds move and unfold to create 6 rooms: living room, dining room, office, guest office, master bedroom and guest bedroom. If you include the kitchen and the bathroom which morphs into a phone booth or meditation room, the apartment includes 10 total rooms.
To create the bedroom, Hill lowers his Murphy bed (designed by the Italian firm Clei– see our video with distributor Resource Furniture:Space-saving furniture). He grows his dinner table from inches to feet. His office is a simple desk-in-a-drawer. The truly tricked-out element is the moving wall that is packed with storage (2 desks, drawers, closets, etc) and opens to create a full second bedroom (with 2 Clei bunk beds that fold out of the wall)*. Magnetized curtains close for privacy, both visual and acoustic.

(Image: YouTube screenshot)

(Image: YouTube screenshot)

Notice the nesting kitchen utensils to save space. (Image: YouTube screenshot)
Describing the design as futuristic, Dirksen said it was a pricey project. The hardware for the moving wall alone was nearly $5,000, which Hill said was too expensive. Still, the design is experimental and one Hill said he hopes to incorporate into a long-term goal of creating rental housing as a part of another one of his companies LifeEdited.
Take a tour of the morphing “6 rooms into 1″ tiny house:
See Dirksen’s full post for more background on Hill’s “LifeEditing” concept here.
Related:
Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.















































































































Comments (120)
Pogue
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 7:25pmLooks like an over glorified prison cell to me!
Very sterile… The walls need some rubber padding.
Could pass as a sensory dep. chamber.
Report this comment
getitgotitgood
Posted on December 9, 2012 at 10:28amRead Glenn Beck’s “Agenda 21″
Report this comment
Jwmajic
Posted on December 9, 2012 at 5:05pmI could never live like that my nearest neighbor is 20 yards away and thats too close.
Report this comment
brasasman
Posted on December 9, 2012 at 8:33pmWHen I saw the spork I chuckled and knew he was out of his mind. Seriously, a spork? I don’t want to live in a place that has sporks. I can imagine the way the guests looked at him with him flinging around his sporks and spouting his leftist ideologies. If Obama would show that that is exactly what he wants for American he wouldn’t have stood a chance.
Report this comment
lemonlover54
Posted on December 9, 2012 at 10:10pmNPR ran an article on their “TED” program about this already happening in India. And they are stealing their land in the country at the same time…they are talked into just giving it up when they move them to the ‘urbanz’…
Report this comment
Grammalady
Posted on December 10, 2012 at 12:15pmThere is no room for all of my hobbies. I paint in oils, so there’s an easle and a drawer thingie to hold all the necessary tools and room for my canvases and then there’s the watercolors and pencil words and my pottery and my calligraphy and the photography and I need a LOT of wall space to hang MY works and the works of my Worlds Cutest Grandchildren and room for my dvd/video/cd collection and all my books and my computer area and my survival for 37 days stuff and ..and… No this kid needs a LOT more room than I have now and I already sleep in a twin bed, no room for a BUNK bed. Geez I’m in my 60′s and I’m not climbing up to go to bed.
Report this comment
darkknight91
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 7:07pmMy recording studio is bigger than this. No, thanks.
Report this comment
Larry E
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 6:38pmI guess I just don’t see the fun and excitement of living in a 20×21 ft space, and have no desire to even try. The UN and all the other expert/genius planners who want to save the planet might do well by trying to stop or at least lower the birth rates in various Asian, African, and South/Central American countries where the vast majority of population growth is.
Unfortunately that would offend the delicate sensibilities of those peoples to breed like rabbits so they want to force the rest of us into dog house sized dwellings in high rise buildings. When it all comes falling down about their foolish heads they still won’t understand what happened.
Report this comment
flrick
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 6:58pmI’ll be happy to move into a home that size. The day after obumbles does, not sooner.
Report this comment
Sumrknght
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 2:44pmGood point FLRICK – have you seen the Hawaii digs that he has for ‘after the White House’? With him touting ‘redistribution of wealth’ I think we should start with HIS. Give that house to a homeless guy… or… me. (laughs)
Report this comment
KyleD
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 6:38pmSmall does not equate to simple or minimal. His house is complex. He’s engineered an inherent complexity into a small apartment to give it the functionality of a larger apartment. He’s deluding himself, especially if he thinks living small means living happily.
Report this comment
Madmartigan
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 8:22pmI totally agree, day after day thats going to get old real fast!
Report this comment
ron2win
Posted on December 8, 2012 at 11:32amWith all the gadgets ,doors ,draws ,closets ,things could get old real quick. To say nothing of getting lazy after awhile to.It is interesting and very functional ,there are probably a lot of people out there that could live in that space quite comfortably.
Report this comment
IbisDev
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 6:36pmThis is an excellent example of what we are up against. The premise is well founded as they state they have a fixed amount of sq ft. It is well designed and engineered, attractive and makes its case for versatility. Who would fault this concept based on the established premise? He saves the clincher for the end: “Americans are now living in an average of 2300 sq ft and thats just not working for us”. Who is us? After they set aside the areas for wild life and then connect them with the migration corridors, your will only have the human habitat centers left to live in. But hey… if your 35 and living on a government pension the rest of your life, why do you need so much space. Coffee and pastries in the morning, cafe life in the afternoon and the pub at night. Works for Denmark… for now. The slow march continues and the Agenda 21 float is next in the parade. These guys are really, really slick. The question is… are we up to the challenge? Tigthen up the chin strap on your tin foil hat, its going to be a bumpy ride.
Report this comment
AZgirl9000
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 7:37pmI wonder how many college graduates are now living in a single room of their parents’ house thanks to Obama? Get used to it.
Report this comment
OneofMany
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 6:16pmIf I’m going to live in an area that small, I’d MUCH rather live in a tent in the woods! That style living is NOT for me… we just moved from a 2100 sq. ft. home with a small backyard to a 3 acre backyard and 4700 sq. ft. so our boys can actually climb a tree or play with a dog in the backyard… Get me OUT of the city any day of the week. I’d rather live even further into the country, but my wife likes some people nearby in case of an emergency…
Report this comment
Do The Right Thing
Posted on December 9, 2012 at 11:29pm@ One/many I know how you feel. When I left the city behind, and ‘bought the farm’ my at the time little boy was 14. Best move we ever made, no more 12 year old coke dealers in school, teachers who cared, (well, most of them hadn’t given up caring yet) and best payoff, he got to see that people can get their hands dirty for a living, and be happy. Not the media version of happy, the authentic version. Looking back to my own childhood, the media has been pushing office weenies since somewhere between ‘Gunsmoke’ and ‘Bewitched, That Girl, WKRP, etc. It seems we simply have nothing entertaining, out here in the country, worthy of the media! What a blessing this warping of reality has been for my family! My boy had 4 wheelers and snowmobiles to have fun with, vs x-boxes and the sort, and that in itself, was worth the move. My nearest neighbor is a half mile away, and that isn’t far enough, in my opinion, not that they’re bad people, we simply feel there’s less stress in living in ones’ own shadow. We barter favors, plumbing, mechanic work, etc. to a great degree, and it works. Can’t do that anymore in our over regulated metro areas. I don’t know where our country lost track of the pleasures of life, and it all became being all about cash. The only thing I miss is Dominoes delivery, and I’ll probably clog up slower without the convenience. (Nothing wrong with Dominoes, mind you, but my cardiologist does not approve!)
Report this comment
Royalkin
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 5:41pmIt’s one thing if someone ‘chooses’ to live this way, but I fear that this will be fate for all of us, considering skyrocketing (Obama’s own words) energy prices, and the UN’s draconian Sustainable Development projects.
My advice? Get the hell out of cities.
Report this comment
betsyyoung
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 5:47pmAbsolutely, get out of the city!!!!
Report this comment
Ballot_Box_Revolution
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 6:06pmThey are trying to cool up the small living space thing so when that part of Agenda 21 kicks in it will be easier to force people into the situation, because all those people will be saying how cool and hip it is,…and its good for the planet!!!
If you don’t want that you must hate the planet.
Report this comment
glassaudioguy
Posted on December 8, 2012 at 9:11am@BBR- that’s exactly what I was thinking, though I’m sure everyone here knows that whatever little cell the UN tries to put us in won’t have any of those amenities.
Report this comment
crazyrightwingmom
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 5:25pmDreams in heads of single progressives who don’t live in a real world with (heavens no!) children. God forbid we reward our work with a comfortable home.
Report this comment
Leslie Anne
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 5:08pmHousing like this should be mandatory for all USAmericans. The family model (same square footage) could be made more efficient by having sleeping pods for the kids…the pods being attached to a rope-n-pulley system so you can have the lil’ ankle biters crawl in, give ‘em a kiss, then hoist them up to the ceiling and out of the way.
Report this comment
DougHuffman
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 5:22pm@Leslie Anne, “mandatory” tyranny.
I live in 900 sq. ft. because I want to and because it enhances the six acres of woods. Remember cottages in the woods?
Report this comment
WarMunger_Al
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 6:08pmLeslie-
just go to prison, you too can live like this. Tiny space, 3 hots and a cot.
Report this comment
Seagal45
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 4:39pmNo thank you, I do not care to live in a hobbit hole.
Report this comment
merik59
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 4:38pmThis is definitely for someone who thinks small… I like the idea of conservation but this goes way beyond & becomes an origami-type challenge just to move from one day phase to another. Not my bag, I guess. I really like the idea of yurts. I want to combine 4-5 yurts into a living arrangement that works for 4 people with 1 meeting & living room. Everyone would have their own yurt for sleeping, study, meditation, what have you. Walkways or ladders between them because they don’t all have to be on the same level & they don’t have to be huge. Then I want to take cast off storage containers & have my husband weld together small domiciles using recycled materials. Dreams can be fun even if they’re not realized.
Report this comment
T-2
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 4:22pmthere’s no room for a grill.
Report this comment
Grey Eagle
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 4:32pmPersonally, this type of housing does not appeal to me. I would say they are getting ready for agenda 21. I notice the lefty gardening magazines are going full steam ahead with sustainable housing, living, downsizing, living off the grid etc.
Report this comment
Gladius_Doctorae
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 4:21pmI honestly dont have the time, energy,or patience to solve a rubics cube every time I need to eat, sleep, or use the restroom.
Report this comment
OneofMany
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 6:18pmh aha h ah hah hhha ah aha.. EXCELLENT post… and that guy talks about simplicity! ha ha ha aah
Report this comment
LisaJKW
Posted on December 9, 2012 at 5:02pmhahahahaha
Report this comment
MGrilla
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 4:20pmSo my wife get’s home from work, goes into the kitchen, opens the cabinet, I’m sitting there, and i’m like , seriously, I’m try’n to meditate here, get your snack out of the fridge……….. I can see it now, the peace and harmony just over-flowing out of that place.
Report this comment
SpankDaMonkey
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 4:10pm.
One good fart would level the place…………..
Report this comment
VRW Conspirator
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 5:32pmLMAO Spank
Report this comment
Dismayed Veteran
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 4:03pmNo big deal. In the Army, I had a bunk, wall locker and foot locker. Way smaller than this and you don’t have to pay rent.
Report this comment
Fubared
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 4:08pmDitto. This guy just sent Bloomturd a Christmas card saying please double my taxes.
Report this comment
Tifn8r
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 3:42pmOh goody! Living in the dorm in college was such fun… I’m sure it would be great to cram my husband and two kids into a tiny living space like that.
I can just see it now… living the life of luxury with one spoon and fork that we all share to save space. Cooking in one pot to save energy and space. We wouldn’t need as much heat, because our body heat would keep the place warm.
Sounds like a granola-baking, tree-hugging, environmentalists dream come true!
NOT for me thanks!
Report this comment
Harold B
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 4:00pmI thought granola was precooked so that saves cooking time. Good Post
Report this comment
MGrilla
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 4:13pmIt’s easy , divorce your husband, and abort your babies, bake up some granola, and home sweet home.
Report this comment
cptenn94
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 5:03pmhey granola is good though….but yeah your completely right
Report this comment
Taquoshi
Posted on December 8, 2012 at 8:22pmThere are times when we are all just need to be alone and not on top of one another.
Report this comment
Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 3:40pmI can see having more house than you need, but why try to convince people to live in a smaller space? If that’s what YOU want to do, fine, but don’t try to convince me. I will live in whatever space my family and I find comfortable and easy. I am not going to pack my bed away every day and move walls, just so I can brag that I use less space thsn the rest of the world.
Report this comment
dmacfarlane
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 4:15pmThis is a propaganda tool of the Agenda 21 plan to create “Transit Villages” , more people in less space. By producing shows like this it looks cool and appealing and could possibly convince others to do the same only to find out later it is more than they can afford to do. Also, by convincing people to move in buildings it leaves room to work on projects like “re-wilding” the suburbs. Also, the comment of the “smaller foot print” sounds all to familiar with the Agenda 21 over-all goal of humans having “NO” footprint. For those who like it that’s tine – but as for me and my family, we will live where and how we choose to live. I highly recommend the book “AGENDA 21″ by Glenn Beck. If you don’t have a copy pick one up today: http://www.glennbeck.com/agenda21/
Report this comment
loriann12
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 4:45pmI agree that it’s propaganda for Agenda 21. But, that said, this is the best of the small houses I’ve seen. If I had older kids who didn’t have “toys” this one might actually work. But we all like having our permanent separate bedrooms. I don’t think I’d like a murphy style bed in my living room. I go to bed before my husband, so where would he sit and watch TV?
Report this comment
blanco5
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 3:38pmI stopped watching after he said, “smaller foot print.” That was in the first 30 sec.
Report this comment
ResistSocialism
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 3:35pmBoring
Report this comment
lel2007
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 3:20pmLooks like a small apartment to me.
Report this comment
DarkestbeforeDawn
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 3:16pmSure, this will work great if you have no children, (population control), limited friends, want to live in a box where you trust the government to provide all you needs because you can’t grow your own food, RENT instead of own, because personal property ownership goes against the collective.
Can you say Agenda 21?
Report this comment
CWPrequired
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 3:15pmAgenda 21 at it’s best.
Report this comment
JEANNIEMAC
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 3:13pmhttp://www.infowars.com/for-rent-your-very-own-agenda-21-shoebox-apartment/
Along with reducing the surplus population by means of sterilization vaccines, abortion, euthanasia, etc., Agenda 21 is a plan agreed upon by world leaders some years ago – to be implemented in the 21st century. It calls for the confiscation of private property and the squashing of people into high density, tiny living spaces.
Report this comment
1TrueOne55
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 3:21pmEurope has been living in “Dense” population centers for Centuries already they are just pushing it around the world with the help of George Soros and the UN. I have relatives that live in Austria and property ownership is only a dream their and nearly 80% of that country lives in large cities like Salzburg, Linz and Vienna. They live like New Yorkers, in apartments that they own rights to occaisonally someone in the family makes the choice to save money for decades to build a “Family” dwelling (two or three story home) for the family and from there they move forward. But it is harder and harder to do as time moves forward.
Report this comment
FISH_BONE
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 3:13pmzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Report this comment
Tifn8r
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 3:44pmTime to get up honey – I need to fold up the bed so I can make breakfast.
Report this comment
GhostOfJefferson
Posted on December 7, 2012 at 4:01pm“Time to get up honey – I need to fold up the bed so I can make breakfast.”
And *here* is the problem with the entire concept. It could work if you lived alone, but throw another human being into the mix and suddenly this goes from “modestly interesting exercise of a concept” to “absolutely unworkable in real life”.