Black Meteorologist Fired After Responding to Racial Facebook Comment About Her ‘Ethnic Hair’

Rhonda Lee (Image source: Facebook)
A black female meteorologist was fired from a Louisiana news station after she responded to a viewer’s Facebook comment about her “ethnic hair.”
Rhonda Lee, formerly of ABC affiliate KTBS in Shreveport, La., had also responded to another reader’s post that had pointed out that the winners of a station contest were all “people of color.”
The first viewer, identified as Emmitt Vascocu, wrote in an Oct. 1 post on KTBS’ Facebook page, “the black lady that does the news is a very nice lady.the onlt [sic] thing is she needs to wear a wig or grow some more hair. im [sic] not sure if she is a cancer patient.” Somewhat strangely, the post received a “like” from KTBS 3 News.

Image source: Facebook
Lee responded several days later to say she was the “black lady” and that she is “very proud of my African-American ancestry which includes my hair.”
“Traditionally our hair doesn’t grow downward. It grows upward,” she wrote. “Many Black women use strong straightening agents in order to achieve a more European grade of hair and that is their choice. However in my case I don’t find it necessary. I’m very proud of who I am and the standard of beauty I display. Women come in all shapes, sizes, nationalities, and levels of beauty. Showing little girls that being comfortable in the skin and HAIR God gave me is my contribution to society.”

Image source: Facebook
Vascocu responded that Lee was “right to be proud of” where she was from and said he was “not at all a racis” [sic.]
“what im trying to say an this is my opionion. [sic] this world has has certain standerd. [sic] if youve come from a world of being poor are you going to dress in rags?” he wrote.

Image source: Facebook
One month later, a second viewer commented on the station’s Facebook page that the child winners of the station’s “Three Minute Smile” contest for a three-minute shopping spree were all “people of color.”
“This is Channel 3, not KSLA, the “Project Pride” network, that might as well be part of the BET channel,” viewer Kenny Moreland wrote.

Image source: Facebook
Lee responded that the children were “picked at random” and that if the poster “truly just want[s] to see the kids happy your message had a funny way of showing it.”

Image source: Facebook
KTBS news director Randy Bain said in a statement to Joural-isms Tuesday that Lee was fired on Nov. 28 for repeatedly violating the station’s policy against responding to comments on the official KTBS Facebook page — a rule Lee said is not written down and that she was never informed of.
“[The station's general manager] claims that even if a policy isn’t on paper we as employees are responsible for abiding by them. There isn’t anything in our employee manual talking about social media dos and don’ts. I was accountable for a rule that essentially isn’t in existence,” Lee told Journal-isms.
But Bain said Lee was “warned multiple times of the consequences” of commenting on Facebook posts, and said another employee, “a white male reporter who was an eight year veteran of the station,” was dismissed for the same reason as well.
“If harsh viewer comments are posted on the station’s official website, there is a specific procedure to follow,” Bain said. “Ms. Rhonda Lee was let go for repeatedly violating that procedure and after being warned multiple times of the consequences if her behavior continued. Rhonda Lee was not dismissed for her appearance or defending her appearance. She was fired for continuing to violate company procedure.”
Earlier this year, Lee filed a discrimination lawsuit against Austin, Texas NBC affiliate KXAN alleging she was fired after being “repeatedly subjected to crude and insensitive remarks about her race.”
Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.















































































































Comments (317)
EllieR
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 1:05pmWhat’s that about pride nowadays? People are proud of weird things: blacks are proud to be blacks, gays are proud to be gays etc. Instead of being proud of one’s own achievements. Wouldn’t it sound silly if I tell you how proud I am of my white skin and normal sexual orientation? Also, I am sure I would be labeled “a white supremacist.”
Report this comment
Red Meat
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 1:11pmWhy are there so many black people on TV and in advertisements when they are only 12 percent of the population?
Report this comment
Dumb_White_Guy
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 1:34pmI’ve been wondering the same thing Red Meat. Quite frankly, I’m tired of the over-utilization. If I wanted to see more I’d move to Detroit.
Report this comment
I-Pay-Taxes
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 1:42pmRed Meat – This has been happening since 2008 and I have yet to find anyone who will answer that question. I’ve called, I’ve written and nothing. It’s like there’s an affirmative action going on in TV commercials. 12+% of the population and yet in 98% of national TV ads??? Same thing has happened with all of the print advertising for the Sunday newspaper flyers.
Here’s the script for TV commercials these days:
The white guy’s an idiot.
The white woman has the inferior cleaning product.
The End!
Report this comment
DoseofReality
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 2:03pmI Pay Taxes – lets see some back up to that 98% remark….
Report this comment
SendTheMeteors
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 2:06pmRed Meat says, “Why are there so many black people on TV and in advertisements when they are only 12 percent of the population?”
I’m not sure if your claim that blacks are overrepresented in commercials is true. But assuming it is, maybe the advertisers are trying to sell their products to blacks. Do you hate capitalism?
Report this comment
stage9
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 2:07pmThe original comment by the guy was not racist, just typical male insensitivity. The idiot hasn’t learned that the number one rule of communicating with ANY woman is to NOT INSULT HER APPEARANCE!
He might as well have said that she looked fat in that dress, or she could lose a few pounds!
He deserves the beating for being an idiot.
Independent4233
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 2:13pmRed Meat
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 1:11pm
“Why are there so many black people on TV and in advertisements when they are only 12 percent of the population?”
That’s an excellent point. Hispanics are the largest minority group in the US, but they’re hardly ever seen as teleprompter readers like blacxks are.
The reason is that Mark Lloyd, Obama’s FCC Czar, warned t.v. stations around the country that if they didn’t hire more blacks the EEOC would sue them for discrimination and they would be bankrupt from high attorney fees from fighting the suit.
The number of black teleprompter readers is amazing, since, as you say, they only amount to 12 to 13% of the population.
This is just ONE example of how this thug administration operates.
It will get far worse. The community organizer hasn’t started his next four year term yet.
Our only chance of stopping these evil black injustices is if the country plummets into a severe depression so that the feds will have to lay off all these millions of people who have been hired as enforcers for black policy.
Report this comment
truthnstuff
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 2:16pmI don’t think we hate capitalism, we HATE Political Correctness.
Report this comment
Godfather.1
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 2:33pm@Independent4233
I’m sure you have a source to back up you claim that Obama threatened stations into hiring more “teleprompter reading blacks.”
Or, is this just another of your completely objective thoughts you discovered in your utopia of lab rats?
Report this comment
Anonymous T. Irrelevant
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 2:37pmRED MEAT
I have commented on here before about that, but I have noticed it has been bi-racial people on commercials and on shows. Ever since Obama hit the scene, I have noticed more bi-racial people in advertising. Maybe it’s just me.
Report this comment
Duddio
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 2:53pmGodfather.1,
You need to find out who Mark Lloyd is. He is Obama’s diversity czar, and in the first year of Obama’s first term, he said whites need to step down for people of color & gays.
Educate yourself:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=tD2aU2Bdg2Q
Report this comment
desertspeaks
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 2:57pmand what was the first thing she did after being fired? file a discrimination law suit! is anyone else tired of the boy who cried wolf yet? I’m waiting for the boy to be eaten already!!!!
This *** is getting old!!!!
Report this comment
BSdetector
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 3:09pmWait, where’s there a woman in that picture???
It looks like an empty room behind the dude in the foreground…
Report this comment
OBummer the Great
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 3:52pmI’m sure someone has mentioned it below…..whenever you have the ADT Security commercials…….it’s the evil middle aged white guy who is breaking into all the houses….the identity theft is from the same group or a young evil white woman. The idiot white goofy male is the **** of all jokes….using the inferior product, GEICO and Progressive Insurance commercials are the best examples…..they do this because they know white people won’t hire a lawyer or that there is not a group that will get involved on their behalf…..not sure why….they are the minority now. Oh, I know why…..these people are too busy supporting everyone else working and not at home watching these pitiful commercials.
Report this comment
Spinetti
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 3:55pmEllier–I think you are talking Affirmative-Action here. Yes, this Rhonda lady is no doubt one of Afffirmative-Action’s shining stars.
Report this comment
Independent4233
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 4:14pmDuddio
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 2:53pm
Godfather.1,
“You need to find out who Mark Lloyd is. He is Obama’s diversity czar, and in the first year of Obama’s first term, he said whites need to step down for people of color & gays.”
Educate yourself:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=tD2aU2Bdg2Q
That’s a good link, Duddio, but this godfather character has been given oodles of links many times to verify assertions made on here, but he pretends as if they’re not valid.
He’s a rabid hater of conservatives and especially conservative Christians, because they oppoose gay marriage and the gay lifestyle, so his only point in being here is to spew hatred and animosaity toward anybody who does not share his agenda.
He’s always hysterically screaming about how bad people on this site are. But he keeps coming back. I guess he’s like the title of Gutfeld’s new book, “The Joy of Hate,” written about how the left loves to hate people.
Report this comment
Godfather.1
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 4:40pm@Independent4233
Oodles of links, huh? You rarely, if ever, provide links to support your BS theories. It’s also quite funny that you bring up loving to hate people, because that would describe you perfectly. You love to hate black people and will find any justification to do so.
As for the link that was posted, he did not say he wanted to force white people to step down, but nice try.
Since you think I hate conservatives and conservative Christian, I would ask you to cite one comment I have made to support that. Since you clearly think I am gay, please find a comment of mine that can remotely support that assertion. You’ll find that nothing I have said supports any of that and it is all based upon your SUBJECTIVE and bigoted worldview.
Report this comment
Independent4233
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 5:09pmGodfather.1
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 4:40pm
@Independent4233
“Oodles of links, huh? You rarely, if ever, provide links to support your BS theories.”
Of course I do. You can’t admit to their veracity, because they conflict with your distorted, programmed views, which are based in pixies, prancing ponies and pink jumpsuits.
Report this comment
Godfather.1
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 5:24pm@Independent4233
You post links, huh? In your last ten posts you have not posted a single link (except for that you copied from an above comment, which doesn’t count). In not one response to me have you posted a link.
There you go again, avoiding all objective thought and simply posting your subjective leanings, like a lab rat stuck in a homosexual KKK utopia that has been conditioned to respond to all things hating blacks and gays.
Are you and your “team” of lab rats ready for the ensuing race wars once the bell is rung that has conditioned your life to hate others?
Report this comment
Timsincali
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 5:41pmRED…. ya hit the nail on the head. 12% plus or minus but 30 to 50% in our faces. White Pride? “That’s racist!” Ya, can’t we all just let nature take her course and let the betters among us rise to the top naturally with out being molested by eeoc, Affirmative action and quotas.
Report this comment
turkey13
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 5:48pmThe law of the land is if you show whites in an ad you must have 15% black also.I called McDonalds and spoke to our manager after I saw a tv ad a couple of years ago with about 17 blackes and no whites. He told me they worked for pennies and the whites all wanted dollars. I haven’t taken self or grand kids to Mickey Mack since and will never step in their doors again.
Report this comment
GuruMeditation
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 5:55pm@Anonymous T. Irrelevant: It’s not just you. It’s been happening for about 4 years now.
Report this comment
MCGIRV
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 6:05pmGood point!
Report this comment
SocialistSlayer
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 6:06pm“I’m not sure if your claim that blacks are overrepresented in commercials is true. But assuming it is, maybe the advertisers are trying to sell their products to blacks. Do you hate capitalism?” ——-
No —– But I don’t care for Smart A***es either !
And he’s correct – There is a larger number of Blacks in commercials now days – 12% of the population and appear in over 1/3 of the commercials – Seems like the quotas are fixed girl !
Report this comment
muffythetuffy
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 6:19pmI am proud of my straight blond ****, I am proud of my Christian religion, I am proud of my white skin, I am proud of by Western European Culture
Report this comment
Independent4233
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 6:36pmGODFATHER
“……..homosexual KKK utopia that has been conditioned to respond to all things hating blacks and gays. ”
“Hating blacks and gays, eh? Interesting isn’t it that your’re considering both in the same category?
That’s known as a Freudian slip, and you admit to a lot when you reveal these things. (Between the lines.)
By defending racist blacks you’re defending obnoxious homosexuals, too, which really tells us where you’re coming from, doesn’t it?
Keep it coming.. The more you write the more we learn.
Report this comment
Cavy from VA
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 6:45pmRed Meat
First I think Ms. Lee is quite lovely and I believe her **** looks fine (compared to some of the dyed ratty looking stuff you see on some Black women) … I have no problem with her appearance. That being said … to address the perceived bias towards Blacks in the media … take note … whenever you see a comedic commercial the fall guy is almost always the “Dumb white guy” (Aflac is an example off the top of my head) … I have complained in my house for years about this … it’s never the Black fellow or the woman who does the pratt fall … IT IS ALWAYS THE WHITE GUY!!!! I’ve been keeping score (sort of … to myself) … so please … just start taking note of who the person is in the commercial who screws up and you will soon agree with me. I’m rather sick of it … it’s just a subtle way of demeaning white folks … over and over and over … I guess we are all just supposed to go Har Har Hee Hee … me? I’m insulted!
TEA!
Yeah I’m one of those (supposed) Racist Tea Party Followers … funny I think Ms. Lee is very attractive … how racist is that? I also think her responses on Facebook were very level headed and correct … It was likely some racist jerk that fired her over that.
Report this comment
The Giver
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 7:07pmObama is the reason. Everyone is bending over in an unnatural way to pay for things they never did to black people themselves.
Lee is ready to pounce on anyone and always assumes it is racially motivated. The guy obviously was referring to her having such a short cut. She took it to mean that he didn’t like her ****. As a black person, maybe she has had racial slurs directed at her, like fat people get taunted, and skinny people get called weak. EVERYONE gets called something at some point in their life… GET OVER IT! The world does not have to walk on egg shell because of her disturbance. She should go for therapy. Maybe Obamacare will pay for it. Sick of the victims. They are the ones that victimize the people round them. God help her.
Report this comment
Godfather.1
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 7:29pm@Independent4233
Again, not a Freudian slip. Simply responding to what you have said and your clear disdain for gays. And, for the record, not hating gays doesn’t mean that someone is gay. Apparently that is lost on you since you hate everything that you are not.
I’ve never defended racist blacks (uh oh, you said that so you must have issues with racism!!!) or obnoxious gays (uh oh, you brought that up too — read between the lines, Freudian slip, lab rat, Utopia, bell, condition, PC, . . . ). You just made that up.
Where are your links? Did the lab rats steal them when you rang your bell that conditioned them to take the links to their anti-PC utopia void of obnoxious homosexuals and racist blacks incapable of objective thought who want to steal all of @Robert’s white women before the race wars get here?
Report this comment
Independent4233
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 7:48pmGodfather.1
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 7:29pm
@Independent4233
“Again, not a Freudian slip.”
Of course it was, old twinkie. Denying it rings really hollow.
“Simply responding to what you have said and your clear disdain for gays. ”
Nonsense. You reinforced what has been known all along, and nobody knows that better than you.
“And, for the record, not hating gays doesn’t mean that someone is gay.”
No, but you go FAR beyond that. Promoting them and including their agenda as a composite of “blacks and gays” tells us all we need to know about you.
It doesn’t do any good to deny it. It’s really obvious, and you know it is too.
Report this comment
Shamrock241
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 8:01pm@ Red Meat maybe your familiar with the name ( Ron Jon Surf Shop ) they have been in Cocoa Beach FL for decades and have many billboards promoting Surf and Sun. They generally swapout what they put on there billboards every few month,but for the first time i can remember they have put black people on the signs and have been up for more than a year, and as everyone knows blacks love to surf and spend alot of time tanning so there always running to Ron Jons to by tanning oil.
Report this comment
SendTheMeteors
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 8:56pmI love a conspiracy as much as the next person. And the idea that President Obama is forcing companies to put more blacks in commercials is a pretty good one!
But I think we should look at this objectively. First of all someone should post some objective evidence that blacks are disproportionately represented in commercials. When some poster says, “gee there are too many blacks in commercials,” there’s a few things I wonder. First, do you actually watch commercials? If so, my advice to you is GET A LIFE! Seriously? You sit there and stare at the TV during commercials?
Second – did I say this already? – do you watch every station in the US and keep detailed statistics about the relative number of whites and minorities in TV commercials across the country? Of course not. Do you ever wonder why it is that when you’re in a hurry, you hit a disproportionate number of red lights and that people seem to be driving really slowly that day? The best explanation for that phenomenon is that traffic hasn’t changed, and the red lights are the same as always, but that YOU’RE internal state has changed.
Third, conspiracy theories are fun, but our country is capitalistic. Money is King. Companies run commercials that they think will promote what they’re selling. If it were true that minorities are overrepresented in commercials, that only means companies think that will make them more money.
I bet you hit every red light tomorrow.
Report this comment
DIgnified
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 8:59pmThat is what you say when you force others to be like you wish to ne
. Tis what it is.
Report this comment
Welcome Black Carter
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 9:41pm“12 % of the population”
I guess you have not heard… black is the new white.
Report this comment
independentvoteril
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 9:59pmOld saying “PRIDE GOETH BEFORE THE FALL” said in many cultures and religions..
Report this comment
Fla Del
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 11:04pmOh Good Grief. She is beautiful no matter what her **** length is.
Leave her alone. Who cares what color she is. Big Deal.
Report this comment
black9897
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 11:08pm@ELLIER
Here’s the thing…anytime a certain group of people (usually minorities) are put down or deemed less than or treated in an unjust manor they will counter act that by stating how proud of who they are. This is perfectly fine (although I think it’s a bit dumb and silly with ‘gay pride’) and happened back when we had segregation. The problem comes when in today’s world where most people aren’t racist you get someone who attacks (or the person feels like they are being attacked) someone else and then they jump to “I’m very proud of my African American ****.” It just isn’t something that needs to be done anymore and the shift needs to be made to being proud of achievements or having good character. Not that we shouldn’t be proud of where we have come from or our heritage.
So that’s why you see a lot of the whole “pride of weird things.”
Report this comment
StripedRed
Posted on December 13, 2012 at 12:35amEllier, the fact that you call it a “normal” sexual orientation is the root of the problem. There is absolutely nothing wrong with being proud of who you are, for every facet of your being like your appearance, your beliefs, or your education. However, to assume that the way YOU are is “normal” and that everyone should look, believe, and learn like YOU is not pride, but ignorance to different people and cultures. And I think that was the message that Rhonda A. Lee put forward.
Report this comment
KoolAidDrinker
Posted on December 13, 2012 at 4:18am@TURKEY13,
The Drive-Thru makes this very easy. I’ll have a number 1 please, and can you super size that?
Report this comment
Tdude
Posted on December 13, 2012 at 6:05amHere’s a thought to the question of, “Why are there so many black people on TV and in advertisements when they are only 12 percent of the population?”
Could it be that they auditioned for the part and the powers that were thought they were the best for that position? I expect every citizen to earn what they get. I believe it is a travesty when someone gets something because of the color of their skin, religion or what ever. I spent years in the military having to work with idiots who got good performance ratings that didn’t deserve them, of both races, for reason such as: ” He’s a great guy and I want him to move up.” “I don’t want it to look like we are racists here.” If the fool couldn’t cut the mustard, the fool couldn’t cut the mustard. Is that the way it should work, not always but getting back to the subject. How are any of you that thinks or implies that the people of color were given the position because of their color, target marketing or some kind of other racial profile reason know that is what happened? It’s an assumption.
Report this comment
old white guy
Posted on December 13, 2012 at 6:22ami do not think her comments required her being fired. there are alot of affirmative action comments on this thread and i think some are valid but they do not pertain to the article.
Report this comment
TheePolitinator
Posted on December 13, 2012 at 8:13am@SENDTHEMETEORS
You are the most ignorant poster currently on TheBlaze. Research. And GTFO
Report this comment
BobtheMoron
Posted on December 13, 2012 at 9:18amProud of being born to whatever race, creed or color doesn’t make a lot of sense. Pride in your own accomplishments is the only little bit of pride one should have.
Report this comment
txbigfoot
Posted on December 13, 2012 at 9:18amtwo employers-two claims. Makes me thing its not them but her. There is no entitlement job in the real world. Get over it.
Report this comment
RRFlyer
Posted on December 13, 2012 at 10:01amThe first two posts I read are racist. That’s all I can take. blaze is filled with haters and it’s turning me off.
Report this comment
JRGJR
Posted on December 13, 2012 at 10:28amred meat
the same reason there is a gay person in almost ever sitcom on the major networks.
Report this comment
rusyn
Posted on December 13, 2012 at 2:27pmthe entertainment industry including the advertising agencies have a social agenda. check out the placement of black people in t v shows and ads. blacks are overrepresented as judges and other people in authority. prisoners, thieves and other negative characters will be under represented by people of color. white men in sit coms are fat doofuses, white women are anorexic shrews, their black neighbors are normal and stable. the commercials on tv are particularly insidious and devious. white men in a ups commercial are fat little doughboys, the black male is buff and smart. white men are shown as idiots in general. and have you seen the proliferation of afros on commercials? 99%of all blacks in commercials have a variation of this **** style.
Report this comment
toto
Posted on December 13, 2012 at 4:14pmGoes back to the liberal propaganda that you don’t have to do anything to be proud of yourself. Just breath. Awards for showing up, or showing up enough, for color, for sexuality, but for actual accomplishments not so much.
Report this comment
Truthbeliever2
Posted on December 13, 2012 at 5:04pmShe was fired because she mentioned God in a positive light. It had nothing to do with policies.
Report this comment
Independent4233
Posted on December 13, 2012 at 5:49pm“But I think we should look at this objectively. First of all someone should post some objective evidence that blacks are disproportionately represented in commercials.”
If this were any kind of publication to be released you would be right, but I doubt anybody has the time on a chat forum to investigate in detail absolute proof of obvious discrimination of this nature. We can look at it objectively, however.
And..forget commercials. They have nothing to do with Mark Lloyd. But take a look at what he says and writes. The following blog is a conservative one, but I chose it in a Google search, because the blog owner gives more insight to the statements in question..
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/seton-motley/2009/09/23/fccs-diversity-czar-white-people-need-be-forced-step-down-so-someone-0
“So white people, good though they may be, must “step down so” “more people of color, gays” and “other people” “can have power.” And thereby “change the problem” of whites running the show.
So who is “in a position where you have to say who is going to step down so someone else can have power?” Why, Lloyd is.
“Lloyd now sits astride the FCC, which regulates and oversees a very finite world indeed. That being the radio dial, and the limited number of broadcast licenses that can be issued.”
And we can look at facts. Fact, there are more black teleprompter readers on T.V. stations now than there were just three years ago. It’s obvious. Counting i
Report this comment
RED_JOHN
Posted on December 13, 2012 at 6:13pm@ BSDETECTOR
You made me blow tomato soup through my nose.
Report this comment
Independent4233
Posted on December 13, 2012 at 6:54pmrusyn
Posted on December 13, 2012 at 2:27pm
“the entertainment industry including the advertising agencies have a social agenda. check out the placement of black people in t v shows and ads. blacks are overrepresented as judges and other people in authority. prisoners, thieves and other negative characters will be under represented by people of color. white men in sit coms are fat doofuses, white women are anorexic shrews, their black neighbors are normal and stable. the commercials on tv are particularly insidious and devious. white men in a ups commercial are fat little doughboys, the black male is buff and smart. white men are shown as idiots in general. and have you seen the proliferation of afros on commercials? 99%of all blacks in commercials have a variation of this **** style.”
You’ve got it right on, rusyn, and it isn’t necessary to do an exhaustive study on anything you’ve pointed out. It’s pretty obvious.
So far as the entertainment industry is concerned, there’s a saying that is shared by people who are intelligent, aware types, who know EXACTLY where you’re coming from: “They always depict the opposite of reality.”
Report this comment
UnknownUser1
Posted on December 13, 2012 at 8:37pmI think the **** looks pretty good. I wouldn’t want to stroke it though.
Bringthemediocre I too have noticed the commercials. So its not just him. I don’t mind it.
I’m a white guy that used to be asked if I was Italian. Then it was Jewish. and the past few years its been Arab. I don’t mind that either. But I guess eventually they will ask me if I’m black or Korean. I think its rediculous we have to check male female white black on application boxes. But I know the reason for this. Getting off subject.
Report this comment
G-WHIZ
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 1:06pmMy mother was Duch and white as typing-paper…she couldn’t stand having all that long-**** and having to useup most of her day trying to keep it “up”. So, she(way-before I was born) desided short-****(just at ear-level) was super-easy to clean and look-nice, so …[2-5-minutes-a-day=****] and the rest-o-the-day was hers!! She also neve used makeup/saved annother hr-a-day eachday! So, simple clothes everyday made her easy to look at. Too many “painted-lady’s”…simple strong and honest with a plethora of hidden-intelligence, everyday she would supprise me with wisdom, even up to her last day on earth. The “hero’s” I had growing-up were hard workers, engineers, doctors, lawyers(etc..) ….mostly-retired so they always had time to answer my questions or teach me how to build/fix many things which interested me early in my life.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:57pmHave you been looking again? Or, did your girlfriend tell on me?
Report this comment
garbagecanlogic
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:57pmIf things are not going to your liking – scream RACIST!
Praise Be To Obama. Psalm 109:8
The U.S. Out Of The U.N.
The U.N. Out Of The U.S
Report this comment
charles116
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 1:15pmHe’s a racist – but doesn’t know it.
Report this comment
Zipit
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 2:14pmDon’t be silly Dora! Obama knows he’s a racist!
Report this comment
armyofnibiru
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 2:23pmshe’s a racist,,and knows it.
Report this comment
paulrogers
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 2:31pmAmen to that US out of the UN and the UN out of the US. Let’s see them try to find the funding for their anti freedom rants than. Come on politicians, get us out of that useless organization!
Report this comment
Beck_Art_Obama_In_PeePee
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 8:47pm“Black Meteorologist Fired After Responding to Racial Facebook Comment About Her ‘Ethnic ****’ ”
WOW, TheBlaze! That is one WHITE-GUILT headline that author Madeleine Morgenstern moshed up.
1) No one has characterized that first Facebook inquiry was “racial” (except you?)
2) “Her ‘Ethnic ****’ ” was NOT from the inquirer; it was the black woman describing it herself
Looks like we-all got us some racist baiters at daBlaze …
Report this comment
OldSurfRat
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:55pmMan this is a real tough one for me.
On one hand the viewer comments were ridiculous, narrow minded and stupid. I wont cry racisim on this but damn stupid. Her comments however were totally justified and done very well.
On the other hand she has company rules to follow and appears to have had several chances.
She needs to be thick skinned if she is going to do work like this.
Maybe she should have created her own page with no company affiliation (free speech)
Either way I say give her one last chance. You have made your point.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 1:23pmThey fired a white man for doing the same. And, she was warned multiple times. She was given more than one more chance. Stop excusing bad behavior. Breaking rules and not accepting the consequence is bad behavior.
Report this comment
circleDwagons
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 1:51pmI think she will be better off somewhere else. She should see her firing as a blessing.
Report this comment
Michigander
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 2:29pmI agree with you, the station is perhaps too quick to react. If I were a black woman, I think I would feel the way she does. I know a lot of black woman who over-process their ****, they should try her approach.
Report this comment
Izzy383
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 3:14pmHoly Cow Jerk.
You actually made a sensible, nonpartisan statement. You feelin ok?
Report this comment
OldSurfRat
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 3:23pmHi Jerk
Always glad to see your bright and smiling face.
Come on admit it. It’s all a put on.
As I said before I think you just like stirring the puddin.
Report this comment
searcher619
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 3:57pmMichigander:
I have to agree. I never understood why backs (men and women) are so willing to use those harsh chemicals the straighten their ****. I rarely even looks right. I’m half Black and half Hispanic. My **** is very curly and never once thought about doing this. I have had black friends, usually women, who tried to convince me to try it saying it would look good on me. I always said I was happy with the **** I was born with.
Report this comment
Chuck Stein
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 5:37pmReally, Oldsurfrat, her comments were “done very well”? Even this part: “Showing little girls that being comfortable in the skin and **** God gave me is my contribution to society”? Well, if that is what she considers “her contribution to society”, then so be it. I hope that such small goals for a life are not the new normal, though.
Report this comment
frust@ted
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 8:01pmI’m with you on this one, i didn’t find anything racisit in any one of these comments. Maybe a little ignorance, but ignorance does not make soemone racisit.
I thought all of the posts were very cordial.
If she does decide to file a suit they will have a dificult time defending a policy that isn’t written down, verbals don’t hold up well.
Report this comment
andrew36
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 9:05pmWell actually Jerk, they say she was warned, she says she wasnt. And frustrated, what do you ignorance doesnt cause racism, of course ignorance causes racism, but just because your ignorant doesnt mean your racist.
Report this comment
frust@ted
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 10:34pmandrew thats exactly what i said, just because someone is ignorant it does not make them a racist?
Report this comment
Gumbercules
Posted on December 13, 2012 at 2:22pmIf news employees aren’t allowed to respond, why are they given access to the fb account? It’s like leaving a loaded gun on the table and telling your 3-year-old “Don’t play with the gun” – you know they are going to play with it when nobody is around. . .
Report this comment
HYPNOTOAD
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:52pm“Earlier this year, Lee filed a discrimination lawsuit against Austin, Texas NBC affiliate KXAN alleging she was fired after being “repeatedly subjected to crude and insensitive remarks about her race.”
Of course she did. As one of obama’s minions, she is obligated to see the world through “colored” glasses. Punish whitey at all costs.
Report this comment
JUSTANOTHEROPINION
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:48pmJust another fabrication to use anti-discrimination laws to sue for money. So fricken tired of these dishonest posers. It’s going to be hard for her to get employment in this field again as it should be. If I had a broadcast station I would not hire her with this history. Seems like she’s trying to make lawsuits her profession.
Report this comment
BOUNCESoff
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:59pmWhenever I read a comment as HARSH as yours and as completely off base as yours, it is obvious that you are ONLY saying those things because you harbor negative feelings towards a certain race. You sound like a lunatic. She did nothing at all, in the way that no one would hire her. Nice try hater, but your attempt at acting like she went around causing problems are as futile and amateur as they come. She is very intelligent, pleasant and moral in her addressing both of those people. I notice you had nothing to say about the moron who had the nerve to say kids should be of a certain race in order to win. Obviously you feel the same way degenerate. i feel sorry for anything or anybody you are guiding or rearing.
Report this comment
Durtypoon
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 1:11pmBouncesoff – dude seriously the guy who commented on her page isnt employed by the company. So why bring it up? SURE it was ignorant and racist, but the POINT is the COMPANY said DO NOT comment on FACEBOOK EVER to people who comment to you..
You like to toss around insults of people being “morons” and “ignorant” and “really the person who has a problem”
Your problem is you DO NOT have reading and comprehension skills. Ones that would allow you to think for yourself instead of taking a side based on race. Just because you didnt say “Race” or (insert skin color here) doesnt mean that you’re not being racist in your thinking before replying.
Just something to marinate on next time before you let your temper dictate your internet-tough-guy replies.
You’re welcome.
Report this comment
AlansTigg
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 1:52pmand the guy didn’t say only children of a certain color should be able to win, he said that he found it odd that all the winners were of the same….while you would might still be wrong in your debates, I would suggest at least attempting to use actual facts in your arguments if you expect people to take you seriously
Report this comment
nonofmybiznez
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:44pmJudge the actions not the skin color. It goes both ways folks. God created all of us and we are equal in his eyes. Ya’ll need to treat each other that way too. We have come too far and there is no excuse for treating people differently based on something like color of skin.
Report this comment
jessieH
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:44pmAfter some of the comments from other “news” reporters, I see nothing wrong with her posts.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:59pmDoesn’t matter. She was told not to post. Another employee had been fired for the same. What part of that don’t you excuse makers get?
Report this comment
Cavallo
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 1:08pmHer bosses told her to stop, more than once. That is what is wrong with her comments.
Report this comment
Abigail Adams
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 1:23pmI see nothing wrong with her posts, either. And if there is no official written rule, why be fired?
Report this comment
IowaWoman
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 1:40pmHer posts were great, problem is she broke the companies policy and was warned several times about breaking the policy. She was well aware of the consequence. Seems to me she wanted to be fired.
Report this comment
dman78
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:42pmHer responses seemed very courteous and well thought out. We don’t know the whole story, but I feel her response to the clownboy was appropriate yet respectful. I will reserve my comments on her firing because we don’t know the whole truth.
Report this comment
BOUNCESoff
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 1:00pmA very fair assessment. WOW! And you’re a REPUBLICAN???????????????
Who’d a THUNK IT (YEA- I SAID THUNK)
Report this comment
Cavallo
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 1:12pmShe violated policy, she was warned about violating policy, she continued to violate policy, she was let go. The fact that she was eloquent about violating the company policy doesn’t change that the violated company policy.
Report this comment
truthnstuff
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 2:24pmViolating policy? A lawsuit? Is there a connection between her and the original poster? Hmmmmmm!
Report this comment
nonofmybiznez
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:39pmWell at first I was on Rhonda Lee’s side until I got to the part that she had been warned several times. I didn’t see anything wrong with her first response about her ****, but her response about the children was inappropriate. If it had been her first time, I would have warned her too. The station should have had a written policy that the company facebook should only be responded to by one person (a media savvy marketing type) only or by management. Every employee should receive a copy of the policy and sign off that they have read it. When you use a company Facebook account, you are representing the company not your individual self.
Report this comment
BOUNCESoff
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:54pmCan you PLEASE, explain just how her second comment was inappropriate!
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 1:19pmBOUNCESoff, it’s not the content of her statements. It’s the rule that she was not to post those statements. She broke her employers rules. She was treated like the other employee. She does not deserve special protection because of her skin color. We call that equality.
Report this comment
Durtypoon
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 1:31pmThe_Jerk – Where is the “Like” button – they need one.
Report this comment
thegreatcarnac
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:35pmIf your boss has fired a person before for being on facebood and has told everyone…’don’t comment on facebook’, then you go on facebook…………you will probably get fired too.
Report this comment
BOUNCESoff
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:43pmI agree, but perhaps the other person was fired for saying soemthing volatile or outrageous. What about her comments were outrageous. They were kind and gentle and extremly respectful. I am sure she has a very great future ahead of her. She sounds just wonderful to me.
Report this comment
warrior21
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 1:23pmThat may be so, but she wasn’t fire for saying something volatile or outrageous. She was fired for commenting on Facebook after being warned not to.
Report this comment
Ash_Kiker
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:32pmridiculous and pointless… not even worth being in the news
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:31pmThis is a BS firing and her **** is just fine!
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:43pmIt’s about following the rules, not skin color, not ****.
Report this comment
AZRACISTBIGOT
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 1:09pmWalkabout
I tend to agree. I read her responses and they don’t seem rude, angry or over the top to me.
in fact, her response was very gracious and on point.
Maybe Chris Mathews could learn from her and be proud of who he is. Just sayin…..
Report this comment
EnigmanDen
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:30pmRidiculous that they fired her. If she’s doing her job, what difference does it make? She’s gorgeous as she is.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:44pmFollowing the rules. A former employee was let go for the same reason, so maybe it’s stupidity too.
Report this comment
Durtypoon
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:46pmdid you read the whole story? she wasnt fired for her looks or lack thereof. She was fired for being told “Do not comment on facebook, ever – for any reason to the people who comment towards you” .. Probably because she’s representings the company and not just herself. Which wouldnt be the FIRST time that something (a firing) like this has happend. She was warned repeatedly and threw caution to the wind and did what she felt was her right. Her right was in fact wrong and she was terminated accordingly.
When you work for a lot of companies you usually end up signing a “contract” of sorts – that you represent the company and that anything you do that would tarnish the companies image (at work or at home or out in public) is grounds for termination.
Her race, looks, body shape, **** length, **** color, etc etc etc – had NO BEARING on her being fired.
Report this comment
SunnyinVegas
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 3:58pmAgree, she is lovely and I didn’t find any of her comments out of line.
Report this comment
BrutalTruth
Posted on December 13, 2012 at 8:57amSunny, Enig,
I also didn’t find anything “untoward” with her comments. But that’s not the point. It’s not even that she made a response to a comment on Facebook, but that she responded to comments on the “Company’s” FB page. That’s the problem. She made the decision to ignore her management’s requirement that no employee respond on the company’s FB page where her comments then become the company’s image.
If she had done this outside of the company it may be viewed differently, but that’s not the case. I just find it incredible that so many people here are focusing on the wrong issues.
Report this comment
Durtypoon
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:27pmReally? -Last time I checked (at least in my home state) you can be fired for no reason. To be warned against doing something and then doing it anyways is “just cause” to be fired. Guess she should’ve joined a union and smoked weed and drank on her lunch break. Least she could’ve been reinstated a few months later. Why is the race card forever being played in this society? “Reverse racism” is not any more justied than racism just because affirmative action and white guilt allows it to happen.
I always love it when i’ve been falsely labeled a racist – opens up pandora’s box of insults that I would have never said that have nothing to do with race at all.. Play the card and get dealt the hand.
Report this comment
YouCantExplainThat
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:44pmRacist.
Report this comment
Durtypoon
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:50pmthe fact that she is sewing on grounds of being fired for racial reasons. Read much? or just hurl insults while drinking maddog?
Report this comment
HYPNOTOAD
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:55pmDURTYPOON, don’t listen to the white guilt haters posting here. Your comment was fine.
Report this comment
Durtypoon
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:56pmBouncesoff – really, you read what i had to say and you pick and choose what you’re going to attack back at. Scroll up and read any post that i have replied and then read the story again. Stop being so critical of what someone on the internet has to say – especially if you didnt read the whole story..
You seem to be stuck on the fact that she was terminated falsely – when in fact she wasnt. And for her to SUE on grounds of being terminated due to her race is just silly. Much like your insult-laden reply to my initial postings.
I have no problems with her, i was simply stating that for her to claim that she was fired due to her race, is reverse racism.
Useful idiot :)!
Report this comment
Uncurable wound
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:23pmThis lady is a class act.A proud American women!I am so tired of all the ghetto queens running around with straightened **** and extensions…..Rhonda Lee didnt have to change her name,she didnt have to scream black power,she didnt try to make herself look white…it seems that she has worked hard for what she has,and has a right to be Proud of what she has done-the American dream.
She seems gentle,patient,understanding,and kind-she is beautiful-in my opinion what a women should be!
The station should be ashamed and it is a great loss to them.
Report this comment
Fubared
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:37pmWell said, seriously. In my hood, I know if it was a good ghetto weekend by the number of **** weaves in the intersections early the next morning. Not sure why the queens throw them out the windows on the way home at 0230. Such a waste.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:41pmYou forgot one very important fact in your diatribe. Her behavior. She refused to follow the rules. Though many blacks believe that their skin color affords them that right, it does not. This is the all too common behavior of many minorities in this country. They use the label of racism as an excuse for bad behavior.
Report this comment
AlansTigg
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 2:01pmdo you actually believe that a company should be ashamed of enforcing policy? Or are you just trying to be a troll and/or are so blinded by visions of oppression that you see it everywhere you look? Shocking as it may be there are actually people out there who don’t make decisions based on skin color
Report this comment
Tri-ox
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:22pmOh well. Ms. Lee sounds like a real troublemaker.
Report this comment
COFemale
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:19pmIf the policy is not written down, the company cannot not enforce a verbal policy. If it is not written down it is a guideline and they have no standing for firing her. A company’s policy must be written down in order to enforce it when it is broken and they must write down they have verbally warned her. If they did none of these she has a case. I hope she fights.
She is beautiful just the way she is and I am wondering if this was a setup to get rid of her because they knew she would respond. I smell some rats.
Report this comment
DZ-015
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 1:04pmAm in full agreement with your second paragraph. The lady is quite attractive, no matter how short she chooses to cut her ****. Also, if the white male who allegedly did the same thing was terminated around the same time, it could well have been an attempt to forestall a discrimination case on her part. The first paragraph is more problematic. Louisiana is somewhat of a legal anomaly, following, to an extent, French, rather than English common law as precedent. Nevertheless, it may still be an “at will” state regarding employment. If so, she could be terminated for any legal reason, or even no reason at all. If she actually had signed an employment contract, it might require such things as written notice of an intention to terminate her, or written warnings of rule infractions. Otherwise, she’s out of luck if she cannot prove an illegal motive for her termination. Hope The Blaze follows up on the case.
Report this comment
Dismayed Veteran
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 1:12pmCofemale
It all depends on which state you live in. In an at will state, the employer can fire for no reason or any reason. Unless you are covered by a labor agreement, an employer does not have to follow a progressive approach to discipline as long as it treats all employees the same (this prevents an EEOC charge).
In a state whose law requires just cause, an employer can still fire you but it must have a reason.
An employer doesn’t have to have published policies to terminate employment. While the absence of policies leaves an employer exposed in an unemployment compensation hearing and/or EEOC charge, the absence of a policy does not preclude termination.
Based on what I read above, I would not have recommended termination. I probably would have given a written warning with the proviso that any further actions would result in disciplinary action, up to an including termination of employment. (this by the way is just cause discipline not at will)
Report this comment
RIGS
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:17pmThe **** grows upward so its easier for them to balance jugs on the top of their heads,
Report this comment
FaithfulFriend
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:34pmI guess that makes sense. Never really thought about how the white european haired tribes couldn’t pull that off, until now.
Thanks for the history lesson.
Report this comment
freedomnetworker
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:35pmthat is just stupid
Report this comment
Priscilla King
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 2:24pm@Rigs: Just plain wrong. People with thin, straight, wispy ****, and people with no **** at all, can learn to balance things on their heads. All it takes is practice.
Report this comment
Fubared
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:15pmYeh, just checked and I could give exactly no concern all around. Where are the meteors she is supposed to be reporting on? Didn’t everyone hear Ray Nagan say it was going to remain chocolate city? Bayou interwebby coms are a bit humorous.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:14pmTypical black American. I don’t have to follow rules or submit to standards, they’re for white people. It’s not my behavior that is the problem. Racism is the problem.
As an aside, I wonder if the the eight year veteran that was let go filed a discrimination lawsuit? Wait, he’s white. I forgot that institutionalized racism, Affirmative Action, made it acceptable to discriminate against white people. Silly me.
Report this comment
SocialistSlayer
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:23pmJust like Channel 4 in DC – “Wednesdays Child” is black 99.9% of the time ! Racism at its best !
Report this comment
caleejr
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:26pmtypical black? What’s wrong with you. – I hope you were being sarcastic.
Report this comment
BOUNCESoff
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:33pmStop crying for attention moron
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:36pmCaleejr, no. This is an all too common behavior among American blacks. That being the case, the word ‘typical’ is accurate.
Report this comment
kegbuna
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:40pmMm hmm American Conservatism. Just wonderful.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:47pmBOUNCESoff, if you have a substantive argument against my statement, then by all means make it.
Report this comment
HYPNOTOAD
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:58pmCALEEJR: obama said “typical white person” and he gets to be president. Shut your hole you hypocrite.
Report this comment
Priscilla King
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 2:30pm@SocialistSlayer: Have you ever noticed what 99% of ALL children in D.C. look like? (Not even to mention that adoption agencies can afford to pay poor single mothers in other parts of the country for “White Newborns,” while children who happen not to be both White and newborn can spend their whole childhoods waiting to be adopted.)
If you know a White child (or children) in D.C. who ought to be on “Wednesday’s Children” and isn’t, now that would be newsworthy…please let us know.
Report this comment
truthnstuff
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 2:30pmJerk…you are absolutely correct.
Report this comment
geauxsaints
Posted on December 13, 2012 at 4:43pmI live in Shreveport & the White gentleman that was fired was a homosexual, & an excellent crime reporter…I hated to see him go & I am sure several ACLU lawyers are en-route to our fair city as we speak.
Report this comment
AmericanStrega
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:09pmIf a rule is not in the employee handbook then the employer better get it in there and give each employee an update. Or else they will get what’s happened here.
Report this comment
kindling
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:09pmWe only know what we are told in the story and I know there is always more to the story, but that said, I like her ****. She is very pretty and she does not need to have a bunch of **** to mess with. I also think if done without a nasty attitude it is just fine to express your feelings about something someone else is saying that is hurtful. Maybe they don’t know it is hurtful and it is good to let them know it is. It is when someone just lashes out at everyone just because they are black or white or brown, or what ever color….there is even people that are blue, you can’t judge everyone like that. She didn’t say anything I can see as bad. She did it tactfully, but again we don’t know everything.
Report this comment
SocialistSlayer
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:24pmI would have fired her for being “Fuggly”
Report this comment
Uncurable wound
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:25pmAgreed we dont know all the facts!
Report this comment
loriann12
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:29pmI like her **** too. I would much rather see a black woman with micro short natural **** than see them straighten it to look more “European” (which is a nice way of saying white) and then be racist. It’s no different to me than a white woman who wears her **** really short and is called a les bian and corrects that view. The person who posted is obviously just ignorant, comparing to her being hired when they wouldn’t hire a man with **** down to his waist.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 1:15pmSocialistSlayer
Just like Channel 4 in DC – “Wednesdays Child” is black 99.9% of the time ! Racism at its best !
***
On that point I agree.
***
But she is not fuggly. Not even close.
Show me a black trait & I will show the environmental stressor that shaped the genome from hypertension, to sickle cell to color to nappy ****.
You should look up Milford Wolpoff & what he said about the ‘big head’ gene & IQ
Report this comment
Welcome Black Carter
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 9:46pmShe is quite attractive. Is she part white?
Report this comment
GENEPAGLIARI
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:07pmWhatever
Report this comment
pap pap
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:00pmThis whole thing is ridiculous.
Report this comment
smash44
Posted on December 12, 2012 at 12:14pmNo it’s not ridiculous. It’s called “fair.” How many whites have been fired for violating corporate policy concerning comments on social networking sites. I’m just waiting for her discrimination lawsuit stating she was fired for being black and a woman.
Report this comment
txannie
Posted on December 13, 2012 at 2:03pmsmash44….finish reading the article. It says they let a white guy go about 8 years ago for the same reason.
Report this comment