Ed Schultz’s Anti-Gun Argument: People Who Wrote the Second Amendment ‘Owned Slaves, Oppressed Women & Were Short on Tolerance’
Despite the fact that the Connecticut school shooter reportedly used guns legally owned by his mother, MSNBC host Ed Schulz said the shooting is proof that we must “come to grips with a changing society” and stop “hiding behind the Second Amendment.”
In other words, Schultz wants lawmakers to start getting serious about gun control. He justified his position by saying that the people who wrote the Second Amendment “owned slaves, oppressed women and were short on tolerance.”
Surprisingly, Schultz admitted that he has been a gun owner for 40 years.
“Tonight is… a time we as a people come to grips with a changing society,” Schultz said. “We need to be the Founding Fathers on how we deal with the sickness in our country called ‘gun violence.’ Hiding behind the Second Amendment doesn’t cut it anymore.”
He continued: “Hiding behind the Second Amendment can no longer be the shield for access. The people who wrote that document owned slaves, oppressed women, and were short on tolerance.”
The MSNBC host went on to say that lawmakers in Washington need to stop doing the bidding of the gun lobby.
Watch the clip via MSNBC/Mediaite below:
In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

















































































































Comments (311)
TORCH9
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:53pmI don’t watch TV….Do people really watch this stuff and think it’s meaningful?
Report this comment
muffythetuffy
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 2:24amBen Franklin and the Pennsylvania delegation owned slaves? John Adams and the delegation from Massachusetts Bay Colony owned slaves too? All the Northern delegations to Congress owned slaves? What a lie that is. The British Empire allowed slavery and Southern Colonies had invested $billions in slaves to operate their semi-tropical plantations just as the Spanish and French did.
Troubled minds lead to troubled times.
Report this comment
MonkeyBeagle
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 3:08amNo One is Watching MSNBC, it only exists because Obama give them Tax Dollars http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVFXI_uNBL8
Report this comment
v15
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 3:36amHow someone can weep over kids getting shot and then fight for their right to kill the unborn is totally beyond me. And, yes, A LOT of people have been brainwashed by these media outlets.
Report this comment
v15
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 3:44amAnd the fact that gun rights are the 2nd freedom addressed makes me think that our founding fathers knew that this was an extremely important freedom. I’m glad that they had the foresight to include this especially since they experienced Tyranny from overseas.
Report this comment
lani59
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 6:00amYou mean fat Ed has owned a gun for forty years and still hasn’t stuck it in his mouth? Come on Ed, do the world a favor and man up like Cobain.
Report this comment
MittensKittens
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 6:44amEd Shitz forgets one important thing, the gun didn’t do anything, the kid was mentally unstable, played violent video games and the mother wasn’t paying attention…
Report this comment
ree758
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 6:50amDo you want them to be as tolerant as you Ed?
Report this comment
ron2win
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 7:05amI ‘ll believe ole ed is sincere about gun control,when he shows all of us a video of him delivering his exspensive rifles and shotguns to a foundry .Where they will be turned in to tupper wear accessories !
Report this comment
johnpaulkuchtajr
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 7:15amIt’s been ten years since a low-life, Nigerian foreign student invaded the Appalachian School of Law in Grundy, VA, and killed three people before being subdued by three fellow students, TWO OF THEM ARMED!
When the shooting started, the two gun-owning students ran to their vehicles and retrieved their weapons.
Funny thing about most folks who mentally snap and resolve to commit mass murder. They’ve never been in a gun fight. When faced with armed resistance, they usually fold or bite the barrel of their weapon.
We will always have our Second Amendment rights because most folks reading this post will die to preserve those rights.
“Remember Benghazi and ALL the Traitors!”
Report this comment
HKS
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 7:17amTV, Hollywood and video games are the problem. That would be the training ground for what happened here. The biggest massacre in this Nation did not involve a gun.
Report this comment
dublinthewagons
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 7:35amI’m ready to give up my gun. Come & get it.
Sucker
Report this comment
BreeZee
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 8:07amHEY ED! they’re the same people that wrote the 1st amendment giving you a right to bad mouth the 2nd amendment, oops I forgot the progressives don’t like that one either.
Report this comment
NHwinter
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 8:08amWe don’t need gun control and we don’t need people lying about the Founding Fathers. We need much better care for the mentally impaired and disturbed, starting with Ed Shultz. He is a pathological liar and a sick person. His anger could explode and he could end up killing Conservatives. The Hollywood types need to be controlled, they all suffer from nacissism, a mental disorder, thinking because they can act they are intelligent enough to actually comment on something meaningful. Every shooter is mentally ill. If they didn’t shoot, they would find another way. We need guns to protect ourselves from those who wish to do us harm. Those advocating gun control just want control. Look at Harry Belafonte saying Obama should jail anyone who disagrees with him. Who is nuts here?????
Report this comment
BreeZee
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 8:11amThis really started with the parents of the 50′s and a domino effect from there. Every parent wants their kids to have it easier than they did. So they let up on the strict upbringing and the next generation does the same thing only with even less discipline and so on and so forth. The problem is every generation gets worse and worse and not better. We now live in a time that is almost opposite from the 50′s
Well we need abortion control, how many unborn babies die or have died due to the irresponsibility of so called grown ups? The progressives have caused this problem with their liberal unaccountable, collective, social, you all get a trophy, non consequential upbringing and your all exactly the same as the next person policies and thinking.
Then there’s the family break down that started in the 60′s with free love, living together, non-committing relationships and the governments “Great Society” policies that made welfare and free handouts easier than trying on your own and excusing fathers from honoring their financial responsibility. Divorce rates in the following decades increased as irreparability and unaccountability took hold.
By not being allowed to fail we don’t learn how to handle mixed or ill emotions nor do we learn how to rise above adversity. This started in the 60′s with the new Dr. spocks and learys of the world proclaiming inferiority complex crapola and lower the standards to compensate for “low” self esteem not to mention all the b
Report this comment
BreeZee
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 8:24ampart 2
By not being allowed to fail we don’t learn how to handle mixed or ill emotions nor do we learn how to rise above adversity. This started in the 60′s with the new Dr. spocks and learys of the world proclaiming inferiority complex crapola and lower the standards to compensate for “low” self esteem not to mention all the bogus mental illnesses they created and gave drugs for..
The progressives have ok’d and grown this violent culture of the youth through mind altering drugs, violence in the movies, TV, certain types of music and mind wasting video games like blk ops that are causing the male population to live secluded at home into their late 20′s and mentally it is stunting their growth not to mention lack of social contact.
Look at the age of most these killers, most are under 30 and closer to 20, only two generations from the 60′s free love and social beliefs of the “hippie” crowd. It is going to get worse because everyone is looking at the wrong problem. We need to review history as to what got us here and if your under 40 you won’t understand what I am saying because it was a had to be there moment.
Report this comment
dissentnow
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 8:38amMy 7 year old son understands that if you ban all guns then only the bad guys will have guns…..
How can anyone take Ed Schultz seriously? He literally foams at the mouth with anger and resentment.
If Ed wants to talk about history, why doesnt he talk about the history of gun control? The KKK began as a pro gun-control organization. I guess that makes anyone who supports gun-control a racist, right?
Anyone who would use this tragedy to push their own political agenda is disgusting! That includes the president and his crocodile tears yesterday
Report this comment
lillymckim
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 8:38amMSNBC has come off the rails there is not a legitimate rational NORMAL person left at this station.
Report this comment
maryval99
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 8:50amFunny the Slave owners were the Democrates people like this continue to get brain farts about this fact.
Report this comment
Advection
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 8:58amAs he said these things, Ed was sitting in a veritable fortress, surrounded by armed guards. People like Ed will always be protected by guns. It’s the rest of us they want disarmed.
Regarding what Ed said, its simply not true. Regarding the crimes, if we change the Constitution, crazy people will find other ways to murder. We can’t “nerf” the world.
Report this comment
LIBSALWAYSLIE
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 9:05amHey Ed, you brain dead moron, Do you think if you lived in those times that you would be any different????? What an idiot you are!!!!!!!!
Report this comment
LIBSALWAYSLIE
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 9:09amI’ll turn in my guns when you prove to me that all the criminals have turned in their guns first. Fair enough??
Report this comment
Daddy Hawg
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 9:11amSounds like an islamist to me. No wonder “the one” supports the brotherhood!
Report this comment
BODYBAG
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 9:14amThis is hilarious coming from Shultz —– the guy who maliciously shot his own dogs
and beat his wife up.
Someone needs to exercise their 2nd Amendment right on this cowardly pile of excrement.
Report this comment
KoolAidDrinker
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 9:29amHey Ed, the slave were prohibited from owning guns so that other men could own them. I guess Ed likes the idea of American’s becoming slaves again. Bite me Ed!
Report this comment
AUsername
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 10:08amhe is going to need machine guns to defend his food haul for his fat ass when economy collapses and people steal food from where they can. because its not that hard to take from a fat weak man like him.
Report this comment
Rothbardian_in_the_Cleve
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 10:41amTo Ed Shultz:
And now the people who want to repeal it are collectivist, totalitarian, plutorcratic, eugenicist, nutjobs.
So what do we do now Ed?
Report this comment
Look4DBigPicture
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 11:01amLiberals (like Ed Schultz) think like children, and have no grasp of reality. Yes it would be wonderful to live in a fantasy world where everyone was kind and loved one another, but in reality, there is an enormous amount of evil in this world. Without the 2nd Amendment, the only people with guns would be those who are evil … like in third world countries ruled by dictators.
Why are so many 20 year old young men suffering from mental disabilities? Why do they feel a need to shoot up massive numbers of people, even small children? This is a societal problem, not a 2nd Amendment problem. It’s indicative of the moral and spiritual decay in our country, which people like Ed Schultz seem to ignore. (Perhaps it’s because he broke his mirror and can’t see how he’s instrumental in causing the decay.)
Report this comment
Independent4233
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 11:21am“He justified his position by saying that the people who wrote the Second Amendment “owned slaves, oppressed women and were short on tolerance.”
They also wrote the constitution and presided over a change that brought millions of people to these shores who appreciated a chance to lead their lives free from oppression and dictatorial control, and didn’t cry about not getting enough freebies.
This leftist geek is one of the greatest purveyors of hate in the media today. The others, of course, are his co-horts on MSNBC, CNN, CBS, ABC and, especially, NBC, plus almost the entire press corps and the entire entertainment industry.
If they were given what they want they would cause this country to look something like Brazillian society where the middle class lives in gated communities, guarded by armed security, while the rabble rule the streets at night.
I’m telling you, people. If you live in the suburbs or, God forbid, the cities, you had better form civil defense groups for your own protection, because this situation looks like every other one right before all hell breaks loose.
These activists all despise traditional Americans and their culture, and are determined to destroy them.
The problem is that they have so effectively disunited us they can issue statements like this at their whim without any fear of repercussions, right along with the anti-white racists in the black community, like those uttered by the likes of Foxx, et al.
Report this comment
Independent4233
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 11:30amjohnpaulkuchtajr
“We will always have our Second Amendment rights because most folks reading this post will die to preserve those rights.
“Remember Benghazi and ALL the Traitors!”
Absolutely excellent post.
I noticed this morning that Alex Jones is also calling for unity and he too encourages battling the gun grabbers to the laast breath.
Report this comment
oneshiner
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 12:42pmThe dumbbell Schultz wrote that about himself:
“He oppresses WOMEN and is totally Intolerant of others”
So, what else is new about this hateful man?
Report this comment
Brad4601
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 1:14pmLet me see if I understand this. Schultz doesn’t want us to “hide behind” the 2nd amendment because it was written by slave holders and people without tolerance. These same founding fathers wrote the FIRST AMENDMENT, allowing for freedom of the press that allows idiot Schultz his microphone.
Liberals always talk compromise. How about this compromise? We abandon the 2nd amendment, and at the same time the first amendment and Ed no longer has a right to have a program?
in the 80s when I went to NDSU in Fargo, Ed was a local TV person and was mocked as an idiot by most of the students. Look how high someone of questionable intellect can rise!!!!
Report this comment
Luke21
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 1:25pm@V15,
Spot on – well said (both accounts – especially regarding the duplicitous thoughts w/ respect to abortion).
I’ll vote to abolish the 2nd amendment when: all the nations (that includes S. America, Mr. Chavez) of the world disarm & destroy ALL weapons & the President agrees to send his/her children to a public school w/out a SS detail & he/she him/herself agrees to walk about in public w/out an armed SS detail. That will obviously never happen – at least not before the 2nd coming of the Messiah, Jesus Christ (Micah 4)
As long as men rule over men, when countries disarm their citizenry only the criminals, tyrants, & despots remain armed.
Report this comment
WarMunger_Al
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 3:10pmEd needs to quit hiding behind the 1st amendment and STFU. The same slave owning founding fathers wrote the 1st amendment too.
Report this comment
Wolf
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 5:30pmWhen this ******* mouthpiece turns in his guns and works against abortion and the liberal agenda, then maybe I’ll turn in mine.
On second thought, I’ll hang onto them in case he’s just doing his usual BSing.
Report this comment
techengineer11
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 6:45pmIt’s interesting to here such filthy trash of today speaking ill of our Founding fathers.. somehow I believe times were a little bit better back then and that people were a little bit more moral and decent.
The problem tod ay is that we have too much tolerance for trash like Ed.
Report this comment
Thomas_Jefferson
Posted on December 16, 2012 at 6:52amHow well is the war on drugs going?
If they cant stop illegal drugs from coming into this country, How are they going to stop illegal guns once they are banned? If the liberals successfully ban guns in this country, It will create a illegal gun trade bigger than the drug trade. 10 Y/O kids will be going to school with .25 caliber pocket pistols shooting each other in class.
Kids of all ages have access to all kinds of drugs. Make guns illegal @ the same thing will happen with guns.
Report this comment
Independent4233
Posted on December 16, 2012 at 2:38pmtechengineer11
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 6:45pm
“It’s interesting to here such filthy trash of today speaking ill of our Founding fathers.. somehow I believe times were a little bit better back then and that people were a little bit more moral and decent.
“The problem today is that we have too much tolerance for trash like Ed.”
A You’ve got it right on, Tech.
I just might add there should be more loud, rabid, in-your-face denunciations by people on the right.
I dislike the Repubs, because they too uptight and timid. They got their azzes kicked more than once because of it.
We have nobody on the right to lead us. Ron Paul was good, but not roguish enough and a bit too old. We need a fiery orator who will tell it like it is and if he’s denouced as a racist or hater to come back with in-your-face charges of his own.
We need what the Boers had in their fight against England in the 1800′s: Our own De La Rey.
http://tinyurl.com/d8jmu52
Report this comment
KidCharlemagne
Posted on December 16, 2012 at 4:34pmmuffythetuffy
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 2:24am
The British Empire allowed slavery and Southern Colonies had invested $billions in slaves to operate their semi-tropical plantations just as the Spanish and French did.
============================
New York City was (and still is by all accounts) the place where mass graves were constructed to bury slaves in:
————-
Disturbing the dead
Slavery in America has traditionally been viewed as a peculiarly Southern phenomenon, brought to an end by the victorious Northern states after the Civil War. In 1991, in downtown Manhattan, an 18th century burial ground containing the remains of hundreds of African slaves was uncovered during excavations for a new office block. The first body turned up in June 1991. Others surfaced in September. The count totaled 13 by early October, as excavation for a 34 storey federal office building in New York’s lower Manhattan inadvertently unearthed the remains more than twenty feet below ground level. Forensic examination identified five of the 13 as the remains of men, one as those of a woman, four as those of adults of undetermined gender, two as those of children, and one as those of an infant.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/empire_seapower/slave_island_01.shtml
Report this comment
MIBUGNU2
Posted on December 17, 2012 at 11:41amThis Fat AZZ can say anything and the libotards that listen
to Ed Schlutz will eat up his swill..smile and agree.. sad !!!
Report this comment
ginger100
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:53pmWhen I see the leader of the free world give up his bullet proof car and SS detail and take down the fence surrounding the white house, I’ll consider it. Until then, I wouldn’t trust anyone as crazy as ed shultz, gun owner, anywhere around my home.
Report this comment
Keatonc33
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 12:18amWhat? thats some backwards logic! Why do you think he needs these things? because of guns in this nation! you want him to stop protecting himself before you would solve the problem in the first place?
Report this comment
DarkJello
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 12:21amChatter by the intolerant Left after this senseless tragedy is salt on the wound.
Report this comment
Jarhead 88
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 12:33amKeaton, you poor ignorant kid, please tell me how you propose to get rid of guns? Laws? You can make all the laws you want, evil people will just break them, look at drug laws, moron. Do you propose of rounding up all the millions of guns and destroying them? Good luck with that (you and people like you will be slaughtered, sheep), you better get rid of all metals to that can be easily fabricated into a gun………that won’t work…….hmm? There is nothing that can be done about it that hasn’t already been tried and thank God there is a rather large group of people (Patriots) who know history and see what is coming next. Good luck in those coming days, kiddy.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 12:34amEd Schultz, another Jewish control freak. All too common.
” Short on Tolerance,” says Schultz. Fact is, rats, dogs, and pigs are very tolerant. Intolerance is what separates man from animal, and the civilized from the uncivilized.
Report this comment
DarkJello
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 12:49amkeaton:
Please enlighten us with a proposed, realistic solution.
Report this comment
banjarmon
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 12:50amThis shooting is yet another tragic example of the failed, grotesque insistence on helpless victim zones where any crazed gunman can be assured of a large number of disarmed, undefended, helpless victims, all crammed into one place, where he can kill many children before an armed defender arrives from elsewhere. It is disturbing and sick that the federal government so hates the right of the American people to bear arms, and so hates their natural right to self defense, that the government insists on making them helpless, disarmed victims for anyone who cares to kill them. And in this case, all of the teachers and staff were willfully disarmed by the Federal Government, by force of law and threat of prison, to ensure that they would be disarmed and incapable of saving the lives of the children entrusted to their care.
That makes the Federal Government complicit in the deaths of these children, and in fact an accessory to their mass murder, by forcibly disarming (with the very real threat of prison) all the teachers, all the staff, and any parent who may have been on school property. That stupid law guaranteed the shooters would meet no immediate armed resistance, which is exactly what is needed to stop such an attack.
In such a shooting (as in every criminal attack), seconds count, and the people best positioned to stop the attack are the people on the scene – the intended victims and/or their care-takers. In this case, that would mean the teachers and staff of the
Report this comment
banjarmon
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 12:51amcontinued…
of the school, and also the parents, who should have the ability to save the lives of their own children as they take them to and from school.
Report this comment
Maji
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 1:04amThe people who wrote and voted in the obamacare act….Wants slaves,wants to obuse women and
elderly people and imposed it with the help of people low intellect!! (aka you fat-Ed)
Report this comment
N37BU6
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 1:25amKeaton: No, it’s not backwards logic at all; Obama has these things for protection against criminals… and so do all of the people you wish to disarm.
It’s the exact same logic, friend.
Report this comment
For my Liberty!
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 1:45amKeatonc33 When you take the guns from the Law abiding citizens, the ONLY ones that have guns are the criminals. Take a look south to Mexico. Citizens are not allowed to have guns, but the drug cartels sure have them…and WHAT is happening??/ People are being SLAUGHTERED! *rme* You may not own a gun, but the way the world is, there is a VERY good chance you will be the victim of a violent crime, and when you are there, in that second, you WILL wish you had a gun to protect you and your family. I GUARANTEE it!
Big mouth Ed is right about one thing..The “sickness in our country”. It is the SICK PEOPLE that are the problem. And LIKE it or not, it is because kids are raised in today’s society thinking they are “owed” everything. They have NO respect for others, and are only concerned about their SELFISH SELVES. Most spend all day playing video games killing people and actually do not “Get” it that when you use a REAL gun, it is not a dag gone game!
Report this comment
wordsofwisdom
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 2:11amWords alone cannot begin to dull the pain & anger that is dominating the families emotions over this kind of evil. It seems that this kind of tragedy visits our society on a regular schedule like someone or something is causing it. I can’t begin to understand what kind of monster would plan to do this or if some evil ideological group planed it & found some mentally deficient person to carry out the heinous act for them. But either way we have some real evil among us. This kind of evil either comes from the devil or another planet. I really only know one thing for sure. It takes a monster or monster creator to do something like this.
I have also noticed that the atrocities are getting worse as if the last one was not bad enough to accomplish the planned objective like confiscating our guns so their needs to be another that is worse until the evil is so revolting that we will give up all our freedoms to assuage the evil among us. With that in mind I have only sadness in my heart for the families, the country and all the insanity that has come to visit us today.
This song is about the evil that lives in some people’s hearts called “The Devils Song” http://www.reverbnation.com/play_now/song_10789987 It may help you identify them before they kill.
Report this comment
skippy6
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 7:35am@ Jerk You just put your foot in your mouth…Why are you so intolerant towards Jews….I don’t agree with Ed either but is he controlling you????
Report this comment
HeartHooves
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 7:37amThe_Jerk: Spoken like someone who knows virtually nothing of the animal world. They are extremely intolerant of any who are not a part of thier little group. They would kill you and think nothing of it. There is no remorse or pity in the animal world.
Report this comment
ginger100
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 8:15amEd Schultz’s Anti-Gun Argument: People Who Wrote the Second Amendment ‘Owned Slaves, Oppressed Women & Were Short on Tolerance’
ed schultz, the most tolerant hypocrite gun owner. 0′bama owns more slaves than anyone on the planet ever. Who was the right wing slut ed?
Report this comment
Speak without Fear
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 9:05amThe Second Amendment is not about hunting and not even really about self-defense. It is about defense against tyranny. And this stupid argument that militia meant some state run/organized military is wrong! The Founding Fathers were very clear as to what the term meant. Sam Adams: “I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.” Gun control is not only not the right answer, it is not Constitutional.
Report this comment
Rob in Katy
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 10:37amYeah, sort of like we would like to see spending cuts before more taxes, secured borders before amnesty – liberals don’t have a good record of keeping their deals. Just look at the limited powers clause, we don’t trust you!
Report this comment
Independent4233
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 11:52amKeatonc33
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 12:18am
“What? thats some backwards logic! Why do you think he needs these things? because of guns in this nation! you want him to stop protecting himself before you would solve the problem in the first place?”
First of all he doesn’t NEED “these things.” He knows that without gun control his brand of totalitarianism could never come about.
Secondly, he’s got immature, childish views that have a proven track record of failure throughout history. Controlled societies will never work for very long and controlled, multicultural societies are assured of failure. It’s as if this fat little dork is completely ignorant about history and human nature.
He’s some pathological little clown who has been inculcated with Marxist doctrine by his elders all his life, assuring him that a multicultural workers’ paradise will guarantee there will be no more Holocausts.
It’s his dumb, feeble way of pursuing what he inanely believes to be a rainbow utopia, but, in reality, is a rainbow nightmare which we are witnessing to a great extent right now.
All indications are that we are headed for break up, which will involve armed, civil conflict, then secession into variopus ethnic, political enclaves, so if you’re thinking the feds can prevent that, better know that tey’ll break along lines of politics and ethnicity just like the general population
Report this comment
ArmedAndReallyPissed
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 12:00pmDon’t reply to the KEATONC33. He is only a TROLL that disagrees with every post. He isn’t worth you time. Ignore the TROLLS.
Report this comment
WarMunger_Al
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 3:21pmKeaton-
the problem is you and your ilk. Democrats are criminals. They murder 300,000+ babies every year (without using guns). You can’t un-invent the gun and you can’t keep them out of the hands of bad people. Every country has gun crime, even those who have banned them. Outlawing drugs did not stop them from being brought in and used, in fact drug use went up. But, liberals do not have the mental capacity to deal with reality and are so dumb they would leave themselves defenseless and easy targets to bad people. I hope you get what you deserve at the hands of a fellow liberal criminal.
Report this comment
wordweaver
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:52pmThe problem isn’t gun control, Mr. Ed. In both of the recent senseless rampages (Portland and Newtown), the guns used were not owned by the assailants. The guns were stolen or borrowed from acquaintances. People like these two who are bent on mass murder will find a way, and gun control isn’t going to stop them.
Report this comment
rawmilker
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 12:32amBy 1830 there were 3,775 black families living in the South who owned black slaves. By 1860 there were about 3,000 slaves owned by black households in the city of New Orleans alone.
Who wants to hear the rest of the story? Shut up ED you ignoramus!
Report this comment
SUNTZU
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 12:50amEd Schults and progressives
Little respect for woman ,want to enslave anyone not just like them
and have no tolerance for free thought.Gee I wonder what the death toll would be if he were
using home made Molotov cocktails or
pipe bombs.
With whats going on in the world ,wars,Murder,Gangs,both street and some
of those elected ,
Gov sending guns to Mexico,and leaving their own out to dry.
We now have a Congress and Senate that have gave up most of their power.
The greatest military in the world about to be cut.
Well the feces is about to hit the fan
When we were a God fearing nation we were unbeatable .
When we turned from God and turned towards the UN
we were stopped from winning wars
Korea-draw and lost the rest . Walked out on S.Vietnam.Iraq almost back to
where it was.And the brotherhood taking the rest of mid east
Well i’m getting old and starting to ramble so I will pour another cup of coffee
and find something stupid on TV to numb my mind.
Report this comment
DIR
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 1:50am@SUNTZU
You may be getting old(er), but your mind is still sharp and you wisdom rock solid and appreciated.
Report this comment
johnpaulkuchtajr
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 8:25amHey Weaver,
Check out my post above.
Folks forget (it’s been ten years) since the shootings at the Appalachian School of Law when a crazed gunman shot and killed three victims.
The gunman was subdued after two students ran to their vehicles and retrieved their weapons.
“Remember Benghazi and ALL the Traitors!”
Report this comment
JUSTANOTHEROPINION
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:51pmThe left has no morals. As expected, they try to further their agenda on the backs of murdered men, women and yes even children. Despicable low life cretonnes. Bunch of disrespectful slime balls!
Report this comment
CatB
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 1:29amExactly .. never let a good crisis go to waste .. well let’s not … we need to outlaw “gun free zones” … make it legal to carry and defend yourself and others … INCLUDING OUR CHILDREN!
Report this comment
TIME_THE_AVENGER
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 7:28amI have some Christmas presents for mr. ed and his liberal friends. They’re t-shirts with targets on them, front and back. All I need are their addresses. …heh, heh, heh.
Report this comment
aproudinfidel
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:51pmSo Ed, were the founding fathers terrorists or what?
Report this comment
nzkiwi
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 12:13amI caught that as well, Aproudinfidel. Owning slaves, oppressing women, and being short on tolerance sounds an awful lot like ceratin Islamists that we’ve heard about…
Report this comment
rawmilker
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 12:48amAccording to janet Napolitano, DHS and Obamma the wannabe dictator they were. the left is trying to change hstory and villify George Washington. Didn’t NBC have a show last month on Presodent Washington? That he was a deranged man, an adulterer?
The left’s plan or the communists I should say, is to, as their favorite community organizer said once upon a time, ‘ fundamentally change america’ …..AIN’T GONNA HAPPEN SKIP!
Report this comment
Lamarr01
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 3:48amThe founders knew the importance of a citizen’s militia. Without weapons, we would have been a British colony for much longer. The British transported slaves to America. The Puritans left English for religious freedom. Armed citizens may have preserved the US Constitution and the Republic many times. Few dictators or kings would attempt to enslave an armed citizenry.
Report this comment
yiska8
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 11:22amAccording to Ed… YES. Hey Ed, one day the First Amendment won’t cut it anymore. He already is dictated to think and say what the Barry regime tells him, so I guess he’s be fine without the First Amendment. Lose the 2nd Amendment and the First Amendment will follow. Smelly, leftist commie trash.
Report this comment
freedoug
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:51pm“Surprisingly, Schultz admitted that he has been a gun owner for 40 years.”
Here is the problem with gun control. The mentally disturbed are not allowed to own a firearm, which, by definition, precludes Schultz from legally owning one.
Report this comment
rickc34
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:57pmSo true, speaking of the mentaly ill what happened to Biden?
Report this comment
Keatonc33
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 12:19amThe mentally ill are able to get fire arms… quite easily
Report this comment
flipper1073
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 9:31amKeaton
Easily but not Legally
That’s the Problem the Crazies an Criminals
will still have guns if the Law Abiding Citizens
give up theirs.
Which We Won’t .
a 20 yr CCW permit holder
An I’ve never Shot anyone. Doesn’t mean I won’t
Just that I haven’t had too Yet.
Report this comment
foxrocks
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:50pmOle Ed hates the constitution, he wants govt to control everything, obama to be King….These libs must not have it figured out yet that if you ban guns, guess who gets them? Criminals! Always have, you will have gun runners everywhere, govt will never control it. More people need to get concealed carry permits asap, Obama will grandstand this to the hilt now so everyone forgets about Bengahzi, Fast and Furious, and all the policies he is sneaking in right now…….
Report this comment
cosette
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 12:16amThe people who wrote the second amendment also wrote the first amendment, you know Ed the one that gives you the right to free speech. So I’ll give up mine when you give up yours. Idiot.
Report this comment
MLeo
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:50pmSaid the guy who is protected by armed security and multiple layers of it.
Report this comment
Don15
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:49pmI bet Ed owns a gun or two himself. Hypocrite. More people are killed with cars in this country than with guns. Let’s outlaw all cars.
Report this comment
Tsoulliho
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:48pmWow, Schultz.
Do you realise the Idea of the Right to Bear Arms existed long before Guns even existed in the original Great Charter of 1215 better know by it’s Latin name Magna Carte. The Principle then was exactly the same as it was when the Founders proposed the second amendment as it is now.
It’s a bit unfair when nut jobs who cares not for the law are better armed than law abiding citizens who would struggle to defend themselves against these criminals should you pass the Gun controls your no doubt pushing for.
This is as clear as day it’self and I’m British.
Report this comment
Woody4USA
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:48pmHey Ed……his Mother owned all the guns used.
Report this comment
McgarnaglesLunch
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:47pmHey, Es,
They also wrote the freedom of speech and freedom of press, thing. So…
Report this comment
aproudinfidel
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:50pmIf his rants didn’t make the news I would never know who this moron is. Never seen him on TV or heard him on the radio, thank God for that.
Report this comment
voodoolife
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:51pmExactly… The people that come for the 2nd and succeed will come quickly for the 1st…
Report this comment
paperpushermj
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:43pmPerhaps …but unlike you Ed they had a brain
Report this comment
demsrtraitors
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:43pmhow much you want to bet this White traitor has security with guns?
Report this comment
DarkJello
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:42pmLawmakers do need to step up their game, no doubt.
This chap “needs to stop doing the bidding of tyrants.” Owned. /thread
Report this comment
mcmeador
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:40pmWell then obviously he has to feel the same way about the entire Constitution. Or maybe only about the parts that are convenient.
Report this comment
BasketFullOfPuppies
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:40pmPeople like Ed Schultz want to enslave the citizenry to the government, oppress others that disagree with him. Is this the behavior of a tolerant person.
Just like his namesake on Hogan’s Heroes, he “knows nothing!”
Report this comment
environmentalandawake
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:34pmDid anyone ask him what that had to do with protecting against a oppressive government, should it form? Oh that’s right, it’s already here
Report this comment
RepubliCorp
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:33pmHiding behind the first admanment doesn’t work either? Same guys wrote that one …Ed
Report this comment
Triple7
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 1:59amThe New Bolshevik Marxists pick apart the constitution to fit the agenda.
Report this comment
Cemoto78
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:32pmEd Schultz is a mental midget.
Report this comment
TimCotter
Posted on December 15, 2012 at 5:41amYou are no longer permitted to use the “M” word.
I suggest “People of inverted stature”.
Report this comment
Al J Zira
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:31pmThey’re the same oppressing, intolerant, woman haters that gave you the ability to open your pie hole even though that which comes from it is inane.
Report this comment
uptickusa
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:26pmAnd you whack off -whats your point ED
Report this comment
TruthTalker
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:32pmWe know this guy. We know no one listens to his idiotic dribble
Report this comment
ThankYouFounders
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:26pmThank you for admitting this Ed. Rush Limbaugh has made this claim about the Left for 25 years (your despising of the founders of our country and the second amendment that is) and people used to laugh at me when I’d mention it. Score one for Limbaugh.
Report this comment
Kupo
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:25pmSchultz’s argument is an ad-hominem logical fallacy that has no place in any sort of rational discourse.
Report this comment
DarkJello
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:45pmAgreed.
But this is how “deep” most delve these days… here in America. Sad panda.
Report this comment
strawberry411a
Posted on December 14, 2012 at 11:23pmWe are with you ED!!!!!!! Mental illness is not a reason to stop doing what your doing!!!!!
Report this comment