Popular Photo Site Instagram Unveils Alarming New Policy: It Could Sell Your Pics Unless You Delete Your Account by Jan. 16
The popular photo filter and sharing app Instagram updated its use policies Monday with a provision that has users up in arms: It can sell user photos without paying or telling them.
One user Clayton Cubitt has called it ”Instagram’s suicide note.”
The updated Terms of Service includes the following (Editor’s note: emphasis added):
To help us deliver interesting paid or sponsored content or promotions, you agree that a business or other entity may pay us to display your username, likeness, photos (along with any associated metadata), and/or actions you take, in connection with paid or sponsored content or promotions, without any compensation to you.
CNET reported Electronic Frontier Foundation senior staff attorney Kurt Opsahl dissecting what this means, saying “it’s asking people to agree to unspecified future commercial use of their photos.”
Not only are users upset that they wouldn’t be compensated for photos of theirs that are sold, but there are privacy implications as well. As CNET puts it, what if there were children in the photo of beautiful Waikiki beach that was sold to a resort without the parent’s permission?
In its blog post, Instagram wrote the changes are effective as of Jan. 16, so users have until then to delete their account or be subject to the new agreement. Many have said they want to do just that:
And Wired wrote up a quick how-to to help users download their photos and delete accounts:
First you’ll want to download all of your photos. Instaport will download your entire Instagram photo library in just a few minutes. Currently the service only offers a zip file download of your photos, although direct export to Flickr and Facebook are in the works.
After you’ve removed your photos from Instagram, you can quickly delete your account and pretend you’ve never even heard of Lo-Fi filter.
Word of warning though, once you delete your account, you will not be able to reactivate it or establish it again in the same name.
Gizmodo too makes some valid points as to why it believes fans should stop whining about the new measures:
What none of these hair-pulling photo-sharing apocalypse-moaners neglect to mention is that Instagram’s a business. A business that charges nothing for something that millions of people use constantly.
So it has three options.
Instagram can charge you to download it, in which case, nobody will download it anymore.
Instagram can charge you a subscription to use it, in which case everyone who has downloaded it will stop using it.
Or, Instagram can figure out a way to license the throwaway pictures you capture with 90 seconds of mental activity throughout the day, because it’s not a photographic non-profit, and needs some way of keeping its meager staff of ten people from being evicted.
Gawker reported Samford University Law School professor Woodrow Hartzog saying Instagram does need to establish some copyright control over its user’s photos, but he added “it is fair to question the scope of many of these terms as potentially outside of the realm of what is required to operate. It’s no secret that users rarely read and understand these terms, so companies have little incentive to draft user-friendly agreements.”
In August, Facebook purchased Instagram for (insert Dr. Evil’s voice from Austin Powers) $1 billion.
Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.
- Obama Doesn’t Return Marine’s Salute, Shakes Hand Instead — Is This a Protocol Misstep? 441 Comments
- Is the Boy Scouts’ Gay Amendment the ‘Beginning of the End’ for the Group? (Plus: Tell Us Where You Stand) 339 Comments
- Church vs. State Complaint Leads City to Remove Christian Crosses on Water Tower — Now See What They’ve Been Replaced With 316 Comments
- This Could Be the Most Haunting Statistic You’ll Ever See 268 Comments
- Priest Gunned Down by Italian Mobsters Now Beatified Read More
- MSNBC Hosts Martin Bashir and Chris Hayes Claim London Machete Killers Aren’t Terrorists: ‘These Are Just Murderers’ 166 Comments
- Did You Catch the Possibly Policy-Changing Ft. Hood Reference in Obama’s Terror Speech? 102 Comments
- Have You Had Scotch at a NJ TGI Friday’s Lately? You Might Have Been Drinking Rubbing Alcohol Read More
- Venezuelan President Blames Toilet Paper Shortage on the Rich 101 Comments
- This Terrible Chart Shows the Change in Food Stamp Participation Over the Last 10 Years Read More
- Disney Makes Absolutely Mortifying Photoshop Mistake Read More
- Trey Gowdy at It Again — This Time with a Jack Bauer Reference! 121 Comments
- ‘My Life Is Full of Blessings’: Flesh-Eating Bacteria Victim Who Lost All Limbs Smiles as She Shows Off New Bionic Hands Read More
- LOOK: Woman Claims to Have Photographed UFO in California 125 Comments
- Lion Named ‘Bonedigger’ and Small Dog Make Most Unlikely Companions Read More
- Rocket Bike Sets Land Speed Record — and Uses a Fuel You Wouldn’t Expect Read More
- How 3D Printing Technology Created a Special Part for Baby’s Windpipe and Saved His Life Read More
- Ore. teen accused of planning to attack school
- Suspected rebels kill 17, wound 24 in east India
- Bruins eliminate Rangers with 3-1 win in Game 5
- NYPD investigating actress Bynes allegations
- AP PHOTOS: Bayern beats Dortmund 2-1 in final
- Mo. highway buckles after rail cars hit overpass
- Tornado victims include animal lover, man in truck
- NTSB: Bridge collapse in Wash. is wake-up call