Pope Benedict Denounces Gay Marriage During Annual Christmas Message: An ‘Attack’ on the Traditional Family
VATICAN CITY (TheBlaze/AP) — Gay marriage activists are going to be more than outraged by the pope’s recent comments about homosexuality. The Catholic leader has taken his opposition to gay marriage to new heights with a strong denunciation of how people today are manipulating their sex and gender to alter their God-given nature.
Benedict made the comments Friday in his annual Christmas speech to the Vatican bureaucracy — one of his most important speeches of the year and one he dedicated this year to promoting family values.

Pope Benedict XVI arrives for his weekly general audience on December 19, 2012 at Paul VI hall at the Vatican. Credit: AFP/Getty Images
In it, Benedict quoted the chief rabbi of France in saying the campaign for granting gays the right to marry was an “attack” on the traditional family made up of a father, mother and children.
Benedict also issued a denunciation of gay marriage in his recently released annual peace message, saying gay marriage, like abortion and euthanasia, was a threat to world peace.

Pope Benedict XVI delivers his blessing during the Angelus prayer from his studio overlooking St. Peter’s square at the Vatican, Sunday, Dec. 16, 2012. Credit: AP
“Those who insufficiently value human life, and in consequence, support among other things the liberalization of abortion perhaps do not realize that in this way they are proposing the pursuit of a false peace,” since peace presupposes protecting the weakest, he wrote in this previous message.
Laws granting legal status for gay unions, he said, “actually harm and help destabilize marriage” by obscuring its specific nature as a union between man and woman that forms the basis of society.
Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.
















































































































Comments (108)
Blazer58
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 3:04pmA union between a man and a woman only
The union that best reflects the ‘image’ of God
The only union that is ‘suitable’ based on the nature of human beings
A union that joins men and women permanently as they ‘cleave’ to one another
The union and context in which children are to be conceived and raised
The only union that is God given and approved
Societies that put emotional fulfillment before right actions and principles will soon give way to a multitude of addictions and deep corruptions and collapse.
Report this comment
HairRazor
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 3:08pmyeah, I was gonna say that.
Report this comment
Zeus is THE Lord
Posted on December 29, 2012 at 1:14pmBlazer, ask God why the insititution of marriage is a colossall failure with a 50% divorce rate, countless broken homes and child-custody turmoil. “Sanctity of marriage” is an oxymoronic joke…
Report this comment
Pnis
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 2:20pmDoes anyone in this world really give a rats @ss what the Pope thinks? I think even most Catholics think the Pope is a joke.
Report this comment
HairRazor
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 3:10pmHowever,… He got that one right.
Report this comment
Pnis
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 3:32pmWithout referring to old worn out arguments about what is or isn’t natural, or quoting the bible, how does two gay people getting married effect you in any way? Why are all of you so concerned with what other people do in the bedroom.
If you don’t like gay marriage, then don’t get gay married. I don’t like brussel sprouts, so I just don’t eat them. I don’t want to stop everyone else from eating them.
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 3:44pmNo TOP_CONTRIBUTOR/FREE_THOUGHT…
YOU give me five reasons why the HIV stats I gave you shouldn’t be discussed when discussing homosexuality and it’s consequences. You keep ignoring it and keep “jamming” me instead. The irony of course is I said that’s exactly what takes place and you’re so locked into your conditioning that you can’t deviate (can I use that term without offending you?) from it.
Report this comment
Free_Thought
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 3:53pmWalkabout. I hurts to see that you tell your son not to be gay. What happens if he is? Will you disown him? Will you send him to marcus bachmanns cure camp? I tell my son to be who they are and that i love him no matter what. If my son is gay is he still not my son? Is he still not my flesh and blood? Love is unconditional. I thought unconditional love was a cornerstone of the christian religion. I can love my son no matter what but apparently your love has limits. Telling him to not be promiscuous is a good thing though. A very good thing.
Report this comment
Free_Thought
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 4:08pmAvenger. First off i am not top contributor. How does a differing opinion make me a troll? Are You that closed minded that you cant handle another persons opinion?
Your child should NOT be learning about fisting in school. Your district should really look into that. There is no reason for a 12 year old to know about that until he sees it on a porn site when he is about 16 lol. However teaching your child that not everyone is the same and that there are people that love the same sex isnt going to confuse your kid. Acceptance will actually help your child become a great human being. I was taught that at a young age and i didnt become gay. Neither did my brothers.
Syphillis and gonnarea are more prevalent in hetero relationships. Sorry but that is a fact. Hiv is the ONLY std that is more prevalent in the gay community.
Do you refuse to give 5 facts because you dont have 5? I asked for 5 facts not opinions. I am not a troll. I like to debate facts with people of opposing views which is why i agree with some of your statements. Can you do the same for me and state your 5? I hope so otherwise it may be you that is the troll. I just want debate. No name calling or anything. I was able to read your posts and decipher your good points and bad points. I never called you a name or put you down. I jave feeling though i chose the wrong person to ask for a reasonable debate on this topic.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 4:12pmFree_Thought (i.e. aimless like a gas molecule aimlessly bouncing around).
So while you love your kid, if they are promiscuous, you do not set them up with new strangers.
So while you love your kid, if they are gay, you celebrate gay marriage or encourage them to bareback fist, or whatever
So while you love your kid unconditionally, if they rob a bank & kill people, you do not shelter them, you turn them in.
Try again Aimless_Thought.
BTW I know what you will think in 20 years.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 4:19pmFree_Thought
Syphillis and gonnarea are more prevalent in hetero relationships. Sorry but that is a fact. Hiv is the ONLY std that is more prevalent in the gay community.
Gays outperform in Hepatitis B too.
Try Again
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 4:25pmDo you have trouble reading FREE_THOUGHT?
I didn’t say kids are being taught f#sting. I said GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network) started by Obama’s “Czar of Safe schools” Kevin Jennings WANTS to teach school age kids this practice. So I’m “taking it up” as you suggested..with the supporters of GLSEN..that’s you champ.
Now you’re resorting to outright lies are you? You said Syphillis is more prevelant in heterosexuals?
Wrong…
“The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said homosexual men accounted for 65 percent of the nearly 12,000 cases of syphilis in the United States in 2007, making them the “primary driver” of increased syphilis rates overall”.
You’re an idiot as well as a rigidly indocrinated homosexual enabler it appears “FREE_THOUGHT”.
And let me quote your beloved Dan Savage…”it gets better” – “While the superbug hasn’t yet been detected in the USA, “it is likely a matter of time” before drug-resistant gonorrhea spreads here as well, says Susan Philip, director of STD prevention and control services at the San Francisco Department of Public Health. Doctors are already seeing the beginnings of drug resistance on the West Coast, especially in gay and bisexual men, Philip says.”
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 4:28pmLOL….you never called me a name “FREE_THOUGHT”…you reflexively called me “angry” and “intolerable” (sic). As you’ve been conditioned to yell when someone doesn’t kowtow to the homosexual agenda.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 4:30pmFree_Thought
Syphillis and gonnarea are more prevalent in hetero relationships. Sorry but that is a fact. Hiv is the ONLY std that is more prevalent in the gay community
***
“Trend data released today in CDC’s 2011 STD Surveillance Report show that primary and secondary syphilis rates are increasing among gay and bisexual men, who now account for more than *** 70% ****of all infections” -CDC
70%
Free_Thought, why do you lie?
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 4:35pmFree_thought
Fgure C. Percentage Of GISP Participants Identifying As Men Who Have Sex With Men, 2000-2011
http://www.cdc.gov/std/gisp2011/figC.htm
Looks like a da_mn tidal wave of misery.
What do you have to say? Apoligy?
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 4:50pmGISP stands for Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project
http://www.cdc.gov/std/gisp2011/figC.htm
***
Free_Thought
Fisting was taught by the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network GLSEN in 2000. The backed off. “Barack Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar” Kevin Jennings is the founder of GLSEN. He was paid $273,573.96 as its executive director in 2007.” -.thegatewaypundit.com
They will try to teach fisting again.
Free thought, why do you lie?
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 4:51pmFREE_THOUGHT…you haven’t had a ‘free thought” in years have you? You think how your lefty handlers in education, media and entertainment tell you to think. You’re not free..you’re in a cage created by your handlers.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 7:04pmFree_Thought
So while you love your kid, if they are promiscuous, you do not set them up with new strangers.
So while you love your kid, if they are gay, you celebrate gay marriage or encourage them to bareback fist, or whatever
So while you love your kid unconditionally, if they rob a bank & kill people, you do not shelter them, you turn them in.
***
So Free_Thought I take it you have no counterargument or you are off the clock.
How many pieces of silver did you get today?
Report this comment
wyllow
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 1:25amI’m Catholic. I care what he says. Don’t speak for Catholics.
Report this comment
GayChristian
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 1:35pmEver since the Catholic Church started permitting marriage between older people, infertile couples, or couples who have no intention of having children, they forfeited the “marriage is for procreation” argument. What difference is there between a man and woman who can’t or don’t want to have kids and a gay couple? No traditional marriage advocate has come up with a compelling answer to this question, which is which a small but growing majority of Americans now favors gay marriage.
I’m not passionate about gay marriage myself, since I believe marriage in the sight of God is more important than civil marriage, a legal contract. But you anti-gay folks are losing the argument. Google and read Republican stalwart Ted Olsen’s “conservative case for gay marriage”, for another view.
Conservative Washington Timjes editorialist Joseph Curl writes: “America 2012 has enormous problems. Is this really an issue that matters to — anyone? Christians, two men getting married doesn’t affect your marriage in any way. Get over it. The Republicans are on the wrong side of history on this issue, and Mr. Obama swept in millions of young voters by his tolerance. It’s time to walk away.”
Read Curl’s warning on how the party’s militant radicalism on gays and abortion is signing the GOP’s death warrant:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/nov/11/curl-time-for-a-new-republican-party/
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 1:53pmOlder people are used to the companionship. When a spouse dies you are 1/2 a person.
There are couples who intend on having no kids. I know of a such a guy. At least he intends of having no kids. But he said that if an accident happen, he would take care of the kid. I have every reason to believe him & believe that he would do a good job. I expect him to have a kid by next December. Accidents do happen. 50% of the kids are born in that manner.
Infertile couples? That is becoming less & less of a problem.
If you consider Adam, then you know Eve was made because he was lonely. Note it was Eve & not Steve. That also explains infertile, older & couples not wanting children.
I expect that you have used your argument before or seen it before in other sites. You were just hoping that no one would reply & they would just cave.
I’ll make it easy on you & look for counter arguments that I might have missed.
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 1:54pmYes ummm..nice try HOMOSEXUALCHRISTIAN. So you cite the exceptions and not the rule and use the exceptions as your argument? Infertility is an unfortunate consequence. Sexual incompatibility is a biologal certainty. Nature just doesn’t let the same sex procreate..let alone the bible.
But by all means….tell me what’s “the right side of history” but putting an “OK” stamp on behaviour that sickens you or kills you for merely having sex? Yes..that “inconvenient truth” again..HIV. According to the most recent CDC numbers 64% of new cases of HIV in this country each year are attributed to same sex sexual activity. This from less than 2% of the population. Can you tell me what’s natural and “ok” about these numbers champ?
Is it customary for homosexuals to disengage their minds when discussing the consequences of their sex habits as you’ve done here?
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 2:05pm” two men getting married doesn’t affect your marriage in any way.”
It does.
1. The number of kids who are gay or are open to gay relationships increases if they have gay parents. This was either the natural level which was suppressed or they are indoctrinated.
2. Teaching that gay is okay, to be celebrated or to be desire will be de rigueur in public school curricula
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 2:14pmIf you read “The Optimal Penalty for Sexually Transmitting Hiv” by Andrew M. Francis
Emory University – Department of Economics & Hugo M. Mialon Emory University – Department of Economics you learn that anaI sex & vaginaI sex are not equivalent. The former transmits pathogens such as HIV at a much greater rate, whole orders of magnitude.
Thttp://userwww.service.emory.edu/~hmialon/OptimalPenaltyForSexuallyTransmittingHIV.pdf
“(1) Take a man A who had risky unprotected anal receptive sex once with a man B. Later,
he has unprotected anal insertive sex 100 times with another man C, who is known to be HIV
free. The probability that A gives HIV to C is 0.054% or 54 of 100,000.
(2) Take a man A who had risky unprotected ******* sex once with a woman B. Later, he
has unprotected ******* sex 100 times with a woman C, who is known to be HIV free. The
probability that A gives HIV to C is 0.000002% or 0.002 of 100,000.
(3) Take a man A who had risky unprotected anal receptive sex once with a man B. Later,
he has unprotected ******* sex 100 times with a woman C, who is known to be HIV free. The
probability that A gives HIV to C is 0.008% or 8 of 100,000.”
from
The Optimal Penalty for Sexually Transmitting HIV
Andrew M. Francis and Hugo M. Mialon
March 30, 2008
Now GayChristian deal with the stats from page 31 of this study. The gay community cited the same authors When the published a paper “Tolerance and HIV”
AvengerK this got me banned from a g
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 2:14pmI’ll tell you why “two men getting married” will affect others HOMOSEXUALCHRISITIAN?
Because I know that allowing homosexuals to marry will not be enough for the hyper-litigious, spiteful Gay Inc and its’ enablers.
If homosexual marriage is ever ratified at the federal level, Gay Inc. will use it as a blunt weapon against any institution or enterprise that doesn’t want to participate in their fantasy. Yes..churches too. They will cry “discrimination” and sue and litigate , vilify and besmirch anyone that resists their agenda. How do I know this? Because that’s exactly what they’re doing right now. They won’t change, they’ll only become more emboldened.
When this happens they will begin taking away the GENUINE rights of other people. The Pope is right but he’s coming from another angle to the same result. This is all part of the left’s desire to diminish the value of family in our society. Marxism makes it very clear…devlaue God and Family and fill the void with the state. No…this won’t be allowed to happen.
Report this comment
Free_Thought
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 2:41pmAvenger. You seem like a very intolerable and angry person. The stuff you put forth is ridiculous. People wanting equality is evil somehow? Nowhere does it say all men are created equal (unless they are gay).
GayChristian. Dont worry. The ignorance and bigotry towards your lifestyle is dying. Not as fast as i would prefer but the dinosaurs with neanderthal thinking are at least on the decline. Besides, this speech is coming from a “man” who was a hitler youth member and also was a part of covering up priest that were raping children. If there is a god and a devil and a heaven and a hell im pretty sure the guy has a nice warm seat for someone like the pope.
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 2:48pmAh yes Orwellianly named “FREE_THOUGHT”…what you’re doing is called “jamming” by Gay Inc.
You impose labels on me like “angy” and “intolerant or “bigot” and “homophobe” (a made up word by Gay Inc and perpetuated by your enablers in education and the media) and do exactly what I said Gay Inc does to anyone that doesn’t buy their fantasy..vilify and besmirch. In fact you’re the angry and intolerant one. Anyone that doesn’t buy the garbage you’re selling has to be attacked and labelled a pariah right? How intolerant and angy of YOU.
Notice…not once did you address what I offered as far as HIV numbers and the consequences of homosexual sex..oh no…that’s still in the closet and will have to remain there right? Can’t speak about the ugly and dangerous side of homosexuality right?
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 2:58pmUser Profile: Free_Thought
Member Since: December 21, 2012
***
The beat goes on and the mind games continue
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 3:04pmHere you go Orwellianly named “FREE_THOUGHT”. Tell me you’re not “jamming” exactly how this article describes.
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/hutchison/040428
Gay Inc is a spiteful, insidious little group of people.
By all means “FREE_THOUGHT”..(or is it “TOP_CONTRIBUTOR”?)…tell me why groups like GLSEN want to teach school age children extreme sex acts like f#sting? Why does my 12 year old need to know about this sex practices of homosexuals? GLSEN you’ll recall was started by Obama’s “Czar of Safe Schools” (Orwell would be proud) Kevin Jennings. Jennings is an admirer of Harry Hay..a very vocal proponent of NAMBLA. It always seems to go back to the kids with homosexuals doesn’t it?
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 3:05pmCompare
54 of 100,000.
To
0.002 of 100,000.
54 / .002 is 27,000 or 4 orders of magnitude
Everything else being equal gay sex if 4 orders of magnitude riskier than regular sex. Andyet they say it is good.
Liberals will argue with people espousing the Bible as a way to live until they are blue in the face. They will mock them & call them Bible Thumpers or just thumpers. They despise them & call them Christianists.
And yet Bible or no Bible there way is just not any good. But they won;lt argue statistics much, because they have no good arguments. I noticed that the liberals attack people using Biblical justifications first & preferentially so than to try to make a statistical/scientific argument.
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 3:06pmYou picked that up too WALKABOUT? Good observation.
Report this comment
Free_Thought
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 3:12pmAvenger. Your hiv stats are correct. Bravo for google. I call you intolerant because you are. You dont believe that all americans deserve the same standings and rights because of their sexual orientation. That is called intolerance. Point me to any part of the D.O.I. of the constitution that bans gay marriage or says that heteros are better or more deserving of the american dream. Liberty and justice for all isnt it.
And yes walkabout i signed up today. Did i do something wrong or did i need your permission to post?
Report this comment
Free_Thought
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 3:20pmI did not call anyone a bible thumper or anything else of the kind so your petty religious persecution act does not apply here. I hate to be the one to tell you guys but decency and love for your fellow human beings is something you are taught by family and loved ones. Why did no one ever teach you that we are all humans and deserve to be treated as such?
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 3:23pmSee “FREE_THOUGHT”? Or is it “TOP-CONTRIBUTOR”? You’re doing it again…yell “intolerant” at me loud and “jam” me out of the picture. That’s the plan right?
Meanwhile you brush off the unnatural and harmful nature of homosexual sex as nothing more than a Google search on my part (you’re wrong on that by the way). If only the consequences of homosexual sex were that innocuous right? And again you’re doing exactly what I said you’d do…brush the consequences of homosexual sex under the rug and hope no one mentions them.
Again..homosexuals enjoy EXACTLY the same rights that you and I do. Why should society put an “OK” stamp on a disorder of the human sexual psyche?
To be honest..it makes more sense to ratify polygamists first. A man with three wives could have himself and two of them working while one remains home to raise all their kids as a housewife. I say we need to address polygamy before we address homosexuality it just makes more sense no?
Report this comment
Free_Thought
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 3:31pmWow avenger. You really are intense huh? If you can give me 5 reasons how gay marriage ruins hetero marriage i will be impressed.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 3:34pmFree_Thought
Did you do something wrong?
Their are trolls like Etch a Sketch that have have gotten new Monikers here to keep in trolling. They have multiple sock puppets to make them look more numerous.
If The Blaze got Websense & blocked a troll for being disruptive, would you disappear too?
So the question is are you really new or or you a troll with another log on/ moniker.
Some people are able to analyze p[rose mentally to see if a person is using multiple aliases. It could be done via program too. Others have used IP identifiers.
What I did was ALERTt avengerk that you could be a sockpuppet. That upsets you?
AIDS stats are more than merely googled. they form the basis of logical argument. Ways of living have consequences. Pointing that out is not intolerant. I tell my kids not to be gay less often than I tell them to not be promiscuous. Actions have consequences.
Would it be intolerant to say being promiscuous is bad? With your logic it would be. You have no leg to stand on.
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 3:39pmWe are all indeed humans TOP_CONTRIBUTOR..I mean “FREE_THOUGHT”…but as humans we need to make sure we preserve the things that have served civilization well for centuries.
I have no need to teach my child a sex act like f#sting as GLSEN wants to teach school age children. Do you? What does it serve to desenstitize kids to the common sex practices of homosexuals?
Tell me what “experimenting” serves my child in school as “Gay Inc” is pushing for schools. Do I really want my child “experimenting” with a homosexual adult and risk catching HIV?
I know what you’re thinking..why did I say “adult”? Well..let’s consult Obama’s Czar of Safe Schools again Kevin Jennings. He failed to report a boy he believed underage in his school that was seeking sex with adult men at a local “pick up” area for homosexuals. Instead Jennings told him to wear a condom. My how “safe school” of him yes?
So should I tell my kids it’s “ok” that homosexuals routinely use certain phone apps and websites to solicit immediate and anonymous sex with partners they have no tangible relationship with? Just line up the venue and time? That they should “experiment” with the same thing, yes?
Like I said..homosexuals don’t like their dark side being exposed because they’ve spent decades making homosexuality appear as innocuous as being left handed.
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 3:53pmLOL…why on earth should I want to impress a troll like you “FREE_THOUGHT? I look at you lefty trolls with contempt, not a need to impress.
No…what YOU will do is tell me why you don’t want those HIV numbers, syphillis, gonorrhea and high rates of promisiciuty that are charateristic of homosexual sexual practices discussed.
I know the answer already and I anticipate more “jamming” from you anyway. The answer is that Gay Inc and it’s enablers have spent a long time trying to make homosexuality appear “normal” so as to garner sympathy for their cause. By ignoring the unnatural consequences and promiscuity rates of homosexuality they enhance this false perception of a “normal” homosexuality. Additionally we have an active school propaganda programme taking place at the same time that encourages “experimenting” and “gender choice” and if GLSEN was allowed to have it’s way..to make kids desenstiized to the deviant sex practices common to homosexuals like f#sting.
Tell me why my 12 year old needs to know how to f#st a sex partner TOP_CONTRIBUTOR..I mean..”FREE_THOUGHT”.
Report this comment
angeleyes63
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 1:11pmAbsolutely gay marriage is an attack on traditional values and an attack on procreation.
Report this comment
Blazer58
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 1:08pmMarriage is a fundamental social institution that does not exist just for the emotional satisfaction of two individuals but for the greater good of the community which stands under the blessing or curse of God. Societies that put emotional fulfillment before right actions and principles will soon give way to a multitude of addictions and deep corruptions and collapse. God will judge any society that institutes same sex marriages.
Report this comment
Granny58
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 1:40pmwell stated.
Report this comment
zorro
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 10:45amWow! The Pope speaks against gay marriage! Now I’ve heard everything!!!
Report this comment
thegreatcarnac
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 9:52amGood work there….Pope. Now..say those who participate is such perversion will be excommunicated and your words will carry more clout.
Report this comment
by faith
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 11:10amWhy is it always excommunication? Excommunication is not what most people think it is.
In the 1983 Code of Canon Law abortion and eight other sins carry the penalty of AUTOMATIC excommunication: apostasy, heresy, schism, violating the sacred species, physically attacking the pope, sacramentally absolving an accomplice in a sexual sin, consecrating a bishop without authorization, and directly violating the seal of confession.
Apostasy is the total repudiation of the Christian faith. Heresy is the obstinate doubt or denial, after baptism, of a defined Catholic doctrine. Schism is the refusal of submission to the Roman Pontiff or the refusal to be in communion with members of the Church who are in communion with him.
Violation of the sacred species is the throwing away the consecrated species of Christ’s body or blood or the taking or retaining of them for a sacrilegious purpose.
Physically attacking the pope is self-explanatory, as are absolving an accomplice in a sexual sin and consecrating a bishop without authorization from the Vatican.
A direct violation of the seal of confession is one in which both the penitent and the penitent’s sin can easily be determined by the confessor’s words or behavior. Again, the penalty of automatic excommunication does not apply if no one perceives the disclosure.
Report this comment
by faith
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 11:28amSimply stated, excommunication means you are not in communion with the Church and most of the time it happens automatically. All non-Catholics are not in communion so therefore excommunicated.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 2:19pmby faith
I am not Catholic. Nonetheless it is a good post. It clears the air.
Report this comment
Pnis
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 5:35pmThe church didn’t excommunicate any of the Nazi’s, why would they excommunicate gays? Church membership is declining fast and they need all the members they can get. The church needs money to pay for child abuse lawsuits and to buy the Pope more expensive chalices and gold.
Report this comment
RandyLee7
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 11:42pmThe church believes that people are homosexual and are probably born that way and that it is unfortunate. Being homosexual does not deprive one of the love of God. However, homosexual sex is a mortal sin and is called “acts of grave depravity” in the Catechism of the Catholic Church paragraph 2357. So you see the Pope is not saying anything new and you can put away your surprise. Homosexuals are called to live a life of chastity through self mastery with the help of sacremental graces and prayer. Also homosexuality is contrary to natural law. Educate yourself please.
Report this comment
by faith
Posted on December 26, 2012 at 2:36pmPNIS
Really?
Here’s the list of the top 15, as reported in the 2011 Yearbook of American and Canadian Churches:
1. The Catholic Church, 68,503,456 members, up .57 percent.
2. Southern Baptist Convention,16,160,088 members, down.42 percent.
3. The United Methodist Church, 7,774,931 members, down1.01 percent.
4. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 6,058,907 members, up 1.42 percent.
5. The Church of God in Christ, 5,499,875 members, no updates.
6. National Baptist Convention, U.S.A., Inc, 5,000,000 members, no updates.
7. Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, 4,542,868 members, down1.96 percent.
8. National Baptist Convention of America, Inc., 3,500,000 members, no updates.
9. Assemblies of God, 2,914,669 members, up .52 percent.
10. Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), 2,770,730 members, down 2.61 percent.
11. African Methodist Episcopal Church, 2,500,000 members, no updates.
11. National Missionary Baptist Convention of America, 2,500,000 members, no updates.
13. The Lutheran Church– Missouri Synod (LCMS), 2,312,111 members, down 1.08 percent.
14. The Episcopal Church, 2,006,343 members, down 2.48 percent.
15. Churches of Christ, 1,639,495 members, no membership updates reported.
Report this comment
by faith
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 9:47amRedefining marriage as anything other than one man and one woman makes about as much sense as redefining a 3 sided object as a circle.
Equal rights? Everyone has the same rights; we are all equal to marry one human being at a time, as long as they are of the opposite sex.
Report this comment
The-Monk
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 9:45amHappy Winter Solstice to those that celebrate it. : )
Report this comment
ares338
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 12:14pmI’ll celebrate anything if I can drink to it….well excluding Islam.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 2:20pmares338
A good man. :)
Report this comment
cemerius
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 9:40amI wish the Pope would be more like a Southern Baptist minister!!!! The rhetoric needs to be ramped up and the Vatican has been so silent on the social issues that the “anti-christ” is winning the war of conscience!!!!!
Report this comment
Flashydave
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 8:49amLuke 11:46 And Jesus said, “Woe unto you also, ye lawyersfor ye lade men with burdensgreiveous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers.”
And we send more and more lawyers as politicians ( well the Dims do ) than any other class of people. That’s were the term “lawmaker” (which should be reserved to God who actually made what philosiphers call ‘Natural Law’) I guess comes from ( also usrped from God ).
Report this comment
JACKTHETOAD
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 8:47amHe finally spoke! Something Good too! Who’d a-thunk it? It’s about time, Holy Father…please keep up the good work.
Report this comment
Tri-ox
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 8:46amBREAKING NEWS: Leader of Catholic Church upholds Catholic Doctrine!
Uh, this is the Pope’s job. Moving on …
Report this comment
Locked
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 8:46am“Gay marriage activists are going to be more than outraged by the pope’s recent comments about homosexuality.”
Doubtful. Saying “the pope is against gay marriage” is like saying “water is wet.” Absolutely shocking!
I don’t agree with a lot of Catholicism’s dogma (which is based in early church traditions, not the Bible), but at least they’re relatively consistent with Jesus’s words on marriage and divorce: namely, you cannot divorce for almost any reason, and even if you DO divorce, you cannot remarry.
Jesus said the same. If you’re remarried, you’re an adulterer.
Of course, then Catholicism needs to add in the non-biblical idea of “annulment.” Just can’t keep well enough alone; so much for traditional marriage.
Report this comment
zorro
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 10:48amI keep forgetting that bible verse which tells us we should ONLY follow the bible. Which is it again?
Report this comment
conservativewoman
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 11:31am@LOCKED – The Catholic Church compiled the Bible in the 4th century! Dogma is based on over 2000 scriptures in the Bible. You need to learn about Catholicism from Catholic source, not protestant pastors or rumors.
Report this comment
Locked
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 1:29pm@Zorro
“I keep forgetting that bible verse which tells us we should ONLY follow the bible.”
I mean if you’d rather follow mortal men than God, that’s your choice. I don’t know why you’d call yourself a Christian (a Christ follower) rather than a lemming though. You admit that God’s word isn’t enough for you. You need others to tell you how to think. I disagree. But that’s why it’s faith, and yours is not mine.
@Conservativewoman
“The Catholic Church compiled the Bible in the 4th century!”
Of course. This is well known.
“Dogma is based on over 2000 scriptures in the Bible.”
Bzzzt, wrong. This is also well known. The Church has created many ceremonies, Sacraments, and rituals that may have Biblical connection, but are composed entirely outside of the Bible.
“You need to learn about Catholicism from Catholic source, not protestant pastors or rumors.”
I know a lot about Catholicism (and most Christian denominations), actually. I just think we should get our teachings from the Bible directly and not rely on clergymen to give us their interpretation of God’s word. Call me cynical, but I tend to think that “holy” men often corrupt the Word.
And I’ve only seen that view confirmed time and again.
Report this comment
RandyLee7
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 11:59pmAbsolutely Ignorant!! The Catholic Church was instituted on the day of Pentecost. The Old Testement was the only scripture around and the Apostles traveled and taught. Incidently all of the Apostles are buried in our churches that they instituted. I refer to Paul when he wrote in II Thessalonians 2:15 “Therefore, brothers, stand firm and hold fast to the traditions that you were taught, either by an oral statement or by a letter of ours”. LOCKED we are “holding fast” as we were told to do. We take this as seriously as the words of Jesus when he said ” Take this and eat it, this IS MY BODY”
Report this comment
ares338
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 8:41amI really don’t care who sucks what but you re right that it’s all part of the strategy to destroy the family unit. They are continually chipping away at our lives.
Report this comment
Marine25
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 9:03amHow is gay marriage destroying the ‘family unit’?
Report this comment
JACKTHETOAD
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 9:20amWow. Now two men can reproduce, too. Whose last name does the baby get? The only way you’re a marine is if you’d just climbed out of the Ocean. Please go back.
Report this comment
Locked
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 9:46am@Jack
“Now two men can reproduce, too.”
A man can have a child from a previous heterosexual relationship. A gay man can use the services of a birth mother. A gay couple can adopt. All things heterosexual couples also do. Is that really your concern about gay marriage? Sounds like a strawman to me.
“Whose last name does the baby get?”
I know several heterosexual couples where the woman keeps her name. No issues there. Is that really your concern about gay marriage? Sounds like a strawman to me.
Report this comment
PROUDGRANMA
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 11:54amLOCKED – Homosexuals cannot reproduce on their own. If you are in a man-man or woman-woman relationship there is NO WAY to NATURALLY reproduce the species. That is argument enough for me why homosexuality is so wrong. The argument is not about fertility drugs/sperm donors or surrogates. The argument is about NATURE. Gays are trying to break down the traditional family and they are blurring the lines of traditional and time tested roles of the male and female/mom and dad. If you think it is so wonderful and that we have somehow evolved on this issue I completely disagree with you. I think there is mass confusion about gender now that is causing massive depression and destruction. Letting it all hang out and letting everyone do whatever feels good to them has consequences. We are seeing the destruction of our culture in so many ways because we have strayed from the commandments of God.
Report this comment
Locked
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 1:22pm@Granma
“If you think it is so wonderful and that we have somehow evolved on this issue I completely disagree with you.”
I’m completely neutral about it because it doesn’t affect me (or in my opinion, society) in the least. I know homosexuality is a sin, but Christian morals have never been the foundation of our nation. And I think we could both agree that divorce and single-parent households are worse morally, societally, and just as bad biblically.
“We are seeing the destruction of our culture in so many ways because we have strayed from the commandments of God.”
Marriage is not a Commandment from God. In fact, it’s considered inferior to celibacy by Paul. As a Christian, I know that it is up to each individual to keep the Commandments: it is not up to government to force them upon people.
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 1:58pmARES…bingo! The left has been trying to disolve the family unit for decades. Why? Because as human beings we have a subconcious yearning for a nurturing and protecting figure in our lives. So if you lose God and family then you can replace them with government. Which is exactly what Marxism aspires to do.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 2:25pmMarine25
How is gay marriage destroying the ‘family unit’?
***
1st off gays are monogamish at best judging from the news, self admission of gay bloggers & gay sites.
Isn’t something like 2/3rds of men & 1/3rd of women have cheated on their spouse sometime in their marriage? That is not good. That does not characterize how many times they cheated & for how much of the marriage. they could have cheated just once & been rolled up into that stat.
It is not perfect. But I bet gays can make that stat worse.
And that is the good news on gay marriage :)
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 2:39pmLocked government can call all marriages civil unions. People can say that they got married at church X. When a gay couple get s”married” at church Y people can roll their eyes.
They do this in Europe & in America. They do this if they are religious or are not. Gays will never be happy. Not possible.
Report this comment
SpankDaMonkey
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 8:36am.
Good job Pope, now only if your words carried some weight………..
Report this comment
grimjack3791
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 8:08amGod be with us all.
Report this comment
WildschweinJager
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 8:01amHer is the three little pigs:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4IrfObVzJo
Report this comment
WildschweinJager
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 8:01am@mittenskittens
You got to see Christopher Walken reads: The Three Little Kittens Who Lost Their Mittens
It will help you Blaze rage.
Report this comment
nzkiwi
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 8:00amWhat’s a metro?
Report this comment
sta
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 8:00amThis was posted at 7:32.
It took until 7:44 for the first Pedophille Priest comment.
That sexual obsession is worn out.
Why don’t we get the same comments on Public School Teacher threads?
Report this comment
nzkiwi
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 7:56amThe pope is right in that the pushing of gay marriage is a deliberate attack on the family. It is part of the declared marxist/socialist agenda.
However, saying that it threatens world peace is taking things over the top and has left a serious message open to easy ridicule.
Report this comment
TeresaJ
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 8:13amActually, I see his point. By threatening the family unit, the most basic, natural structure in which future children are raised and taught their values, it does threaten world peace.
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 8:28am@NZKiwi:
You are on the money with the progressive Marxist/Leninist means of undermining society and culture via the destruction of traditional values and ways.
I found this a couple of days ago on the Strategic Studies Institute site that concerns Venezuela and the goals/means of Bolovarian Marxist/Leninism
I thought it would be of interest:
www (dot) strategicstudiesinstitute.army (dot) mil/pubs/display.cfm?pubID=1139
Close up the gaps and replace the (dot) as needed.
People have severely underestimated the vision and ability of Chavez and what he is still building for South America. This is something I do not know if even Glenn is aware of.
Report this comment
qpwillie
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 8:40am@Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
A little off the subject here but the Blaze does allow links to be posted intact.
Report this comment
Diane TX
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 8:52amNo, Nzkiwi,
That’s how life on earth is actually ordered. Family unit – mother, father, child/children. Neighborhood – units of families. Cities/towns – units of neighborhoods. States – units of cities/towns. Nation – units of States. Nations – units of Earth. Earth – unit of the solar system.
Report this comment
nzkiwi
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 8:57amThanks for that link, Snow.
I had a look at their home page and it has some interesting looking headlines. I’ve bookmarked it to check out later (I really must get some sleep shortly).
Cheers, mate.
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 10:24am@QP:
Normally links I post have no problem appearing, enough of the time they never show up to where I do this.
Report this comment
WildschweinJager
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 7:53amImagine that, the Pope supporting the Bible, who’d have thunk it.
The trolls will be out in force to discredit him soon.
Report this comment
cdn1979
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 8:03amlets see. he’s a former nazi and supports child molestation. i think he does enough to discredit himself.
nzkiwi
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 8:16amActually he was drafted into the Hitler Youth. All boys were required to enlist at the age of 14 and there was no choice in the matter.
He was ordered into an anti-aircraft battery at the age of 16 and became an infantgryman just before the war ended. He wasn’t a nazi.
Being an atheist, I have no particular inclination to stick up for him, but facts are facts…
Report this comment
proliance
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 12:07pmPlease don’t confuse trolls like cdn1979 with facts. His little brain may shut down.
Report this comment
Free_Thought
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 3:02pmI think he does a good job of discrediting himself on his own. The man knew his priests were raping children and did nothing except move them to and from parishes. His opinion on anything is void if he couldnt even protect his parishoners children from sexual abuse.
Protect the world from gays but pedophiles are ok. Great message your Popiness. Jesus would be so proud of you.
Report this comment
cdn1979
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 7:44ami want to hear him denounce touching little boys.
Report this comment
nzkiwi
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 7:52amHe did denounce it, but not very loudly…
Report this comment
Locked
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 9:48am@Time_2_end
“Among the most vile of people on planet Earth besides the homosexual is the pedophile homosexual.”
… and not the heterosexual pedophile? It’s worse for grown men to rape little boys than little girls?
You are seven kinds of twisted.
Report this comment
biohazard23
Posted on December 21, 2012 at 7:43amLiberal heads exploding and whiny outraged tantrums commencing in 3… 2… 1…
Report this comment