Watch Live: Second House Hearing on IRS Scandal

Check Out Today’s Hot Posts on TheBlaze Blog!

Media

White House Petition Calls for…Deporting Piers Morgan Over Anti-Gun Views

Dec. 22, 2012 3:54pm Madeleine Morgenstern

White House Petition Calls for Deporting CNN Host Piers Morgan Over Anti Gun Views

A new online White House petition is calling for CNN’s Piers Morgan to be deported for “attacking the Second Amendment” following the Connecticut elementary school massacre.

“British Citizen and CNN television host Piers Morgan is engaged in a hostile attack against the U.S. Constitution by targeting the Second Amendment,” the petition states. “We demand that Mr. Morgan be deported immediately for his effort to undermine the Bill of Rights and for exploiting his position as a national network television host to stage attacks against the rights of American citizens.”

Morgan has battled pro-gun advocates several times on “Piers Morgan Tonight” in the wake of the Newtown shooting, even calling one gun lobby director a “dangerous man” who brings “shame” on his country.

“How many more kids have to die before you guys say, ‘we want less guns, not more’?'” Morgan asked Gun Owners of America head Larry Pratt earlier this week.

White House Petition Calls for Deporting CNN Host Piers Morgan Over Anti Gun Views More than 7,000 people had signed the petition as of Saturday afternoon. It would require 25,000 signatures by Jan. 20 to garner an official White House response.

The petition was apparently created by Kurt Nimmo of the website infowars.com.

Morgan acknowledged the petition on Twitter Saturday, tweeting at one point: “6,600 Americans have currently signed the petition to deport me – meaning 311,993,400 clearly want me to stay. Thank you.”

In another tweet he said it was ironic that the petition-signers would have him deported for using the First Amendment to express his views.

“Ironic U.S. gun rights campaign to deport me for ‘attacking 2nd Amendment rights’ – is my opinion not protected under 1st Amendment rights?” Morgan wrote.

Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (343)

BHOHG2G
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:46pm
Hey Piers, the reason you’re right to free speech is protected is because we have guns. Wake up bird brain commie limp noodle.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- LIBSALWAYSLIE
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:57pm
  “6,600 Americans have currently signed the petition to deport me – meaning 311,993,400 clearly want me to stay” REALLY? Is this how your tiny brain works?? This idiotic statement is delusional and obviously completely wrong.
  
  Report this comment
- The-Monk
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:59pm
  I’ve got a bad feeling about these petitions.
  
  That being said; I used to work for a guy that would berate the Declaration of Independence before every 4th of July day off from work. After another lecture on the 3rd year I told him that if it wasn’t for the USA and our freedoms he and his parents would have grown up sewing swastika’s on German wool coats.
  
  He never mentioned it again.
  
  Report this comment
- The_Hut_In_Co
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 5:13pm
  I’m thinkin that they will be ice skating in he!! before this white house does anything of the sort.
  
  Report this comment
- SCREW-WINDOWS
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 5:15pm
  Thats the problem to many foreigners with no respect or patriotism for the country that gave them freedom to escape oppression. The true patriots of this country are being overwhelmed by inferior products and we are no longer a pure patriotic country.
  
  Report this comment
- Chuck Stein
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 5:23pm
  It’s tradition. The British have been trying to disarm Americans since April of 1775. Didn’t work that time. A lot of British were eventually “deported”, too.
  
  Report this comment
- skimmer57
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 5:44pm
  We need to forget that little freedom of speech thingy!
  
  Report this comment
- SpeckChaser
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 5:54pm
  By that logic there are more than 300 million people who do not like his show.
  
  Report this comment
- The-Monk
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 6:33pm
  Hi SpeckChaser,
  
  Good to see you back !!!
  
  I hope all has been well with you. Merry Christmas !!!
  
  Report this comment
- dwilco77
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 6:42pm
  His Country has 5 times the violent crime rate that the U.S. does, and it is rising yearly. The U.S. violent crime rate has decreased in the last two years. England has banned guns, but is not immune to mass murder by guns. This article lists a few. He needs to quit lying, and distorting the truth on our airwaves. He has the right to do so off the airwaves.
  
  http://www.murderuk.com/mass_murderers.html
  
  Report this comment
- WarMunger_Al
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 6:50pm
  It is ironic that he would use the first amendment to eliminate the second…All liberals should be deported.
  
  Report this comment
- valiant1776
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 6:51pm
  Just came back from my local gun shop. It looked packed, yet the cashier said that it was slow compared to earlier. They have been jammed with customers all day. All semi-automatic rifles were sold out when I got there, around 5pm. The progressive’s plan is backfiring, thank God. They want to leave our schools unprotected with their gun-free zones, and yet we the people now are demanding better security and armed personnel in our schools. Amen to that. The elites and politicians all have armed guards. They write laws to protect themselves and leave us common folks without protection. The constitution says equal protection under the law. Start the presses and expose these closet Marxists for what they are.
  
  Report this comment
- DoGooder
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 7:37pm
  No Piers, your not an American. You have no rights under our constitution
  
  Report this comment
- gb123
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 8:43pm
  60 million Brits don’t want him back but can t sign the petition. I vote for a neutral teritory such as Cuba or North Korea.
  
  Report this comment
- SendTheMeteors
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 8:45pm
  I don’t have cable so I don’t see this guy much. I was traveling on business last though week did see some his comments sitting in a hotel room. He’s kind of a jerk isn’t he? I suppose he has to get ratings.
  
  But, ignoring his Hannity-like approach to interviews on gun control, here’s what I heard. He thinks that it’s crazy that anyone – an insane person, a terrorist, a person who has openly stated his intention to kill as many people as possible – can walk into a “gun show” and buy the weapons he needs to carry out his plans. Too be sure the vendors at these gun shows aren’t selling antique weapons, they’re selling weapons that they can obtain legally and then upping the selling for those who couldn’t pass background checks. He probably wonders if the Founders meant the Second Amendment to provide cover for terrorists and crazy people who want to kill children. I sort of do myself to be honest. Does the Second Amendment really apply to terrorist and child killers? Is there no way under the Second Amendment that we can prevent those people from getting guns.
  
  The other thing he may be thinking about is large magazines. Do you know when Jared Lee Loughner was overcome and stopped killing people? When his magazine emptied and he attempted to reload. Not before. And yes, there was a cop right there who didn’t take a shot because the area was so crowded and he was trained not to kill innocent people.
  
  Report this comment
- oldguy49
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 8:59pm
  send him back…….we have enough stupid -idiotic liberals that are citizens
  
  Report this comment
- IndyGuy
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 9:06pm
  The-Monk
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:59pm
  I’ve got a bad feeling about these petitions.
  
  Yeah….They are taking names so they know what doors to kick in first…
  
  Report this comment
- pitboss711
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 9:22pm
  If Piers Morgan invited a guest to his house and the guest started telling him how to run his house, I wonder how long it would take Piers to kick the rude guest out. Morgan needs to understand that HE is a GUEST in our house!!
  
  Report this comment
- Walkabout
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 9:42pm
  SendTheMeteors
  You post a lot for being on business.
  
  Piers Morgan sounds no different than the hosts of MSNBC.
  
  Report this comment
- commies.in.the.wire
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 10:16pm
  We will soon have the government health care and taxation Europeans enjoy. Of course they feel obliged to lecture us about firearms, violence and crime. Misery loves company.
  
  The fact every source of weaponry is now sold out is the vote of the remaining true American people. The rulers and their dependent/immigrant class need to understand we aren’t afraid of racial “outrage” like the Rodney King rampages and all of those since. We can handle it, no worries.
  
  People aren’t buying these items up to turn them in. They are buying them because they have no confidence in society. The law protects criminals, including the criminal government. Atlas is shrugging, but choosing to not go gently.
  
  Report this comment
- pakaeboiboi
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 10:26pm
  Barrak ….. SLAVES DON’T NEED GUNS ….. disarm your SLAVES before its too late.
  
  Report this comment
- jmmjr49er
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 10:28pm
  I believe more citizens signed the petition than watch his show.
  
  Report this comment
- commies.in.the.wire
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 10:33pm
  Ask the Brits how they like their crimewave.
  
  https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc6/282985_478450875532098_1158846544_n.jpg
  
  UK violent crime capital of Europe
  
  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/5712573/UK-is-violent-crime-capital-of-Europe.html
  
  Report this comment
- valiant1776
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 10:40pm
  @sendthemeteors
  
  “Does the Second Amendment really apply to terrorist and child killers? Is there no way under the Second Amendment that we can prevent those people from getting guns.”
  
  Yes, it’s called putting mentally unhealthy people in institutions. Unfortunately, your liberal buddies in Government, and the ACLU, have given these nutcases, and other folks with severe mental health issues, the right to roam the streets freely.
  
  “In February 2012, Connecticut Senate Bill 452 (SB452) was put forward to remedy the fact that Connecticut was one of less than ten states in the US to lack an “assisted outpatient treatment” law.
  
  But the bill was passed to Connecticut’s Joint Committee on Judiciary in March, where it quietly faded away because of opposition by those who viewed it as “egregious” and “outrageously discriminatory.”
  
  …Why didn’t the legislation pass? Because the ACLU and other “civil liberties” groups and individuals cried foul. The ACLU in particular said 452 would “infringe on patients’ privacy rights by expanding [the circle of] who can medicate individuals without their consent.” They also said it infringed on patient rights by reducing the number of doctors’ opinions necessary to commit someone to institutionalization.”
  
  http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/12/16/Recently-Defeated-Connecticut-Mental-Health-Bill-May-Have-Stopped-Friday-s-Shooter
  
  Report this comment
- lani59
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 10:46pm
  I will gladly pay for a one way ticket to the UK for this limey b@stard.
  
  Report this comment
- encinom
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 10:50pm
  Not once in American history has the use of the 2nd Amendment defended any rights. The 2nd Amendment is an outdated relic from a time when State Militias and not a Federal Army defending the country. Britian, Australia and other modern, Western democracies have banned such weapons and not fallen to dictators. Its nothing but paranoid fantasies of the cowardly gun owner that endangers America’s children.
  
  Its time to repeal the Amendment and recall all military styled assault weapons. There is no need for them and America is drowning in the blood of the innocent.
  
  Report this comment
- Farmer74
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 11:20pm
  As a British Subject, Piers Morgan is not granted any rights under the Constitution, such as the intellectual wants to be, he would know that, but there again facts have no place in his Liberal blabber. He doesn’t even realize that the 6,600 who want him deported, are part of the 7,000 total viewers of the Clinton News Network.
  
  Report this comment
- valiant1776
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 11:32pm
  @encinoman(aka)caveman
  
  You are one ignorant, deluded, misinformed leftist idiot.
  
  Have you ever heard of the Continental Army, which was separate from state militias?
  
  The Congress of the Confederation officially created the United States Army on June 3, 1784. The Constitution was adopted on September 17, 1787. The Bill of Rights came into effect as Constitutional Amendments on December 15, 1791. The US Army had already been formed when the Bill of Rights was ratified. The state militia is not dependent on the non-existence of a federal army.
  
  Only Congress, not states, had the power to raise and support Armies. Article 1, Section 10, reads, “No State shall… keep Troops,” The militia was not made up of enlisted soldiers, nor was its existence intended to form some kind of inferior army, but consisted of called upon able-body private citizens.
  
  “The militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves… all men capable of bearing arms…” – “Letters from the Federal Farmer to the Republic”, 1788 (either Richard Henry Lee or Melancton Smith)
  
  Report this comment
- valiant1776
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 11:35pm
  Supreme Court Joseph Story was appointed by President James Madison, the Father of the Constitution. Joseph Story was present during the Revolution and ratifying of the federal Constitution, and was one of the most influential early commentators on the US Constitution. In his Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, vol. 3 at pp. 746-747 (1833), he has the following to say about the Second Amendment,
  
  “The importance of this article will scarcely be doubted by any persons, who have duly reflected upon the subject. The militia is the natural defence of a free country against sudden foreign invasions, domestic insurrections, and domestic usurpations of power by rulers. It is against sound policy for a free people to keep up large military establishments and standing armies in time ofanding armies in time of peace, both from the enormous expenses, with which they are attended, and the facilee means, which they afford to ambitious and unprincipled rulers, to subvert the government, or trample upon the rights of the people. The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them…”
  
  Report this comment
- valiant1776
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 11:36pm
  “…And yet, thought this truth would seem so clear, and the importance of a well regulated militia would seem so undeniable, it cannot be disguised, that among the American people there is a growing indifference to any system of militia discipline, and a strong disposition, from a sense of its burthens, to be rid of all regulations. How is it practicable to keep the people duly armed without some organization, it is difficult to see. There is certainly no small danger, that indifference may lead to disgust, and disgust to contempt; and thus gradually undermine all the protection intended by this clause of our national bill of rights.”
  
  Report this comment
- valiant1776
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 11:38pm
  @caveman(aka)encinoman
  
  You say the second Amendment is outdated? I guess the slaughter of tens of millions innocent citizens by their own Government in this past century is also irrelevant. Tell that to the poor souls that are dust, in ashes or under dirt who died in the hands of rulers from the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, militaristic Japan, nationalist Spain, fascist Italy, communist China, despot North Korea, dictatorial Cuba, or genocidal African states and tribes. When you take your head out of your arse, please feel free to come back and enjoy an actual honest discussion based on fact and reality.
  
  Report this comment
- valiant1776
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 11:42pm
  @encinoman I almost forgot, you’re an idiot.
  
  On Nov. 8, The New York Times reported from Berlin, “Berlin Police Head Announces ‘Disarming’ of Jews,” explaining:
  
  “The Berlin Police President, Count Wolf Heinrich von Helldorf, announced that as a result of a police activity in the last few weeks the entire Jewish population of Berlin had been ‘disarmed’ with the confiscation of 2,569 hand weapons, 1,702 firearms and 20,000 rounds of ammunition. Any Jews still found in possession of weapons without valid licenses are threatened with the severest punishment.”
  
  On the evening of Nov. 9, Adolph Hitler, Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels and other Nazi chiefs planned the attack. Orders went out to Nazi security forces: “All Jewish stores are to be destroyed immediately. Jewish synagogues are to be set on fire . The Führer wishes that the police does not intervene. All Jews are to be disarmed. In the event of resistance they are to be shot immediately.”
  
  “One of the first legal measures issued was an order by Heinrich Himmler, commander of all German police, forbidding Jews to possess any weapons whatever and imposing a penalty of twenty years confinement in a concentration camp upon every Jew found in possession of a weapon hereafter.”
  
  http://www.tysknews.com/Depts/2nd_Amend/nazi_repression.htm
  
  Report this comment
- valiant1776
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 11:48pm
  BTW, “well regulated” means properly discipline, equipped and trained. The second Amendment is not an old relic. The Bill of Rights does not only protect an armed citizenry, but demands that they be properly trained in the use of arms. To this day, there are still many high schools in the US that have target shooting competitions and rifle teams.
  
  During WW2, Maryland’s Governor called upon its own private citizenry to be prepared in the case of an invasion:
  
  Report this comment
- valiant1776
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 11:48pm
  “The sincere hope of every person in Maryland is that our State may never experience invasion or attack. That we should consider such a thing as possible is in itself a terrible shock to the American state of mind. Nevertheless, with so much of the world overrun by the enemies of Democracy, and with the invasion of Java and New Guinea as well as other points in the Australian Archipelago fresh in our minds, we would be foolish, indeed, not to be prepared, as completely as possible, for any such happening, even here in Maryland…
  
  With the prospect that the regular Army units will be engaged in more important operations elsewhere, and with our State Guard and Military Police assigned to particular functions, it is felt absolutely necessary to have an additional protective force—: as a home guard—for the protection of our various communities…
  
  The Maryland Minute Men, armed with weapons with which they are thoroughly familiar from long use, operating in a community in which they are accustomed to every road and trail and stream, and aroused to fighting pitch by the knowledge that they are serving to protect their own homes, their family and all that they hold dear in life, will prove a staunch defense against any enemy activity…”
  
  Please, read the whole speech: http://marylandshallissue.org/get-informed/historical-information/preparing-maryland-invasion-ww2/
  
  Report this comment
- SendTheMeteors
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 12:37am
  valiant1776, so you’re in favor of the government involuntarily incarcerating people who are “mentally ill?”
  Isn’t that a bit like the Soviet Union? Who decides who is crazy? And yet you’re saying liberals are preventing people from being incarcerated due to mental illness? And you’d like the government to start putting crazy in jail?
  
  valiant1776, figure out what you believe. You’re young right? You want to give the government the power to put “crazy” people jail, and yet you’d be the first to speak out about crazy people going to jail if you agree with their political philosophy. I imagine you sound a little crazy to some. How would you like it if you were thrown in jail based on your idea that, were it not for liberals, you’d be imprisoned?
  
  Report this comment
- JustMeHere_01
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 1:04am
  @encinom
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 10:50pm
  Not once in American history has the use of the 2nd Amendment defended any rights. The 2nd Amendment is an outdated relic from a time when State Militias and not a Federal Army defending the country. Britian, Australia and other modern, Western democracies have banned such weapons and not fallen to dictators. Its nothing but paranoid fantasies of the cowardly gun owner that endangers America’s children.
  
  Its time to repeal the Amendment and recall all military styled assault weapons. There is no need for them and America is drowning in the blood of the innocent
  ——————————————————————-
  Are you stating that not once has a home owner been protected by the 2nd amendment? You are stating that there has never been a case where a home owner used their 2nd amendment rights to protect their lives and shot a home invader?
  
  Report this comment
- valiant1776
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 2:12am
  @SENDTHEMETEORS I said no such thing. The question proposed was, how could we have lawfully or reasonably stopped this maniac from obtaining firearms. To which I pointed out that such a law could have been passed which would have made it possible for the mother of this maniac to present sufficient and compelling evidence to a sworn judge for the purpose of having her son, not some stranger, evaluated for proper treatment, and if need be, supervised or confined to an institution providing the care needed. Would that have stopped Adam Lanza? Absolutely!
  
  I doubt that you would be able to understand such a concept, as your quick assertions, and vast ludicrous presumptions, lead me to believe you have a low reading comprehension level, or are challenged at independently being objective and discerning fact from fiction.
  
  Report this comment
- valiant1776
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 2:22am
  Has the MSM not taught you to search for the truth yourself?
  
  “The court shall require the certificate/s, signed under penalty of false statement, of at least two impartial physicians selected by the court, one of whom shall be a practicing psychiatrist, both of whom shall be licensed to practice medicine in the state of Connecticut… who shall be a practicing psychiatrist… who has been a practitioner of medicine for at least one year and who shall not be connected with the hospital for psychiatric disabilities to which the application is being made, or related by blood or marriage to the applicant, or to the respondent. Such certificate/s shall indicate that such physician has personally examined such person within ten days of such hearing. The court shall appoint such physician/s from a list of physicians and psychiatrists provided by the Commissioner of Mental Health and Addiction Services and such appointment/s shall be made in accordance with regulations [to be] promulgated by the Probate Court Administrator… The physician shall make a report on a separate form provided for that purpose by the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services and shall answer such questions as may be set forth on such form as fully and completely as reasonably possible…”
  
  Please read the whole bill: http://www.cga.ct.gov/2012/TOB/s/pdf/2012SB-00452-R00-SB.pdf
  
  How the hell does it even remotely resemble the USSR?
  
  The ACLU has blood on its hands.
  
  Report this comment
- GhostOfJefferson
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 2:36am
  He has every right to say what he wishes. That said, he’s clearly an ignorant toad, whose smug, gormless face clearly begs to be punched by a fist just for showing up in daylight. Petitions on a website are pointless. Morgan (isn’t that a German name?) is pointless. Let him blather. Beneath his English accent is a mind as keen and sharp as a wet sailor’s sock.
  
  Report this comment
- GhostOfJefferson
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 2:40am
  @TheDadde
  
  Actually, he does. The Bill of Rights codified long standing British rights that were considered universal. In other words, they were rights that belonged to all men, regardless of nationality. Piers, the smug little toad, likes this for the freedom of speech thing, but he’ll recoil in horror if you mention that the average Englishman should and must be armed with comparable arms to the military. The English (alas, my kin) have been programmed to forget their past (as have, alas, my other kin, the Scots). They simply don’t even have an inkling of their history any longer, but plod along smug and arrogant, all the while enabling tyranny.
  
  Report this comment
- encinom
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 3:32am
  Valient, you know what USSR, Nazi German and China all have in common, they are not the United States. You live in a world of paranoid fantasies. The 2nd Amendment has never stopped a dictator. The 2nd Amendment is an outdated relic, neither Britian or Australia fell to dictatorships after their weapons bans. Enjoy your toys while you can.
  
  Report this comment
- MetalPatriot
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 3:58am
  Valient…
  
  That was by far the most comprehensive and impressive use of damnable evidence against idiocy I’ve ever had the priviledge to enjoy. I wish I was that well versed, or at least had the right books to reference. Any recommendations are welcome.
  
  Encino…
  
  You’ve just been schooled, but, I fear under the influence of Progressive Professors. The use of the term “paranoia” is common fodder for anti-Constitutionalists these days. Any proof or evidence that is contrary to the “modern times” or “new era” or whatever it’s to be called is always ridiculed. Your themes, motivs, and word choices give you away.
  
  BTW: Why DO you have so many screen names?
  
  Report this comment
- valiant1776
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 4:16am
  @caveman The second Amendment doesn’t grant to the people any Right. The second Amendment only addresses and declares a certain natural Right already belonging to the people. By the way, Americans have already effectively exercised their natural Right to self defense and self preservation. They patriotically and heroically terminated the tyrannical threat which King George III posed.
  
  Your last comment is as irrelevant as a the dirt under my shoes. You refuted nothing, substantially proved nothing, and provided nothing of historical fact or reality. You might as well have spoken out of your rear end.
  
  You know what the Russia, Nazi Germany and China all have in common?
  
  They all have citizens from their own countries who escape their national socialist Governments and come here to the free United States of America where their right to self defense and self preservation is recognized and protected! Now go back to lala land where you can ignore reality and make up your own fantasy world filled with madcows and one horned jackasses.
  
  The second Amendment only applies, legally, to the US and its citizens, so of course it has never directly stopped foreign dictators you dimwit. However, the Right to resist tyranny and overthrow an oppressive and unjust Government and establish a new Government, is universal, and the duty and natural Right of every people. I suggest you move to North Korea wherein your ignorance would be much more appreciated.
  
  Report this comment
- HappyConservative
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 7:35am
  Piers, you idiot. The 311,993,400 people just haven’t heard about this petition yet. You are welcome to First Amendment rights -IF you are an AMERICAN! Go back to G.B. and take Martiin Bashit- er Bashir with ya!
  
  Report this comment
- Walkabout
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 8:19am
  encinom
  The Pennsylvania state constitution mentions fire arms for used in defending one’s home. At the time eastern Pennsylvania was not in the frontier. It was east of the mountains. The right to bear arms was not put in the state constitution solely or mainly to defend against the British or anyone else. As an aside in the late 19th Century the Kaiser did give consideration to invading the U.S. over a diplomatic incident occurring in the Pacific Ocean. Back to the Penn State constitution. When the people of Pennsylvania approved of the 2nd amendment they were approving of the right to bear arms to defend one’s home.
  
  Report this comment
- Walkabout
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 8:26am
  Encinom must approved of these deaths. There is no blood.
  
  “Among illicit drugs, cocaine was involved in 482,000 visits, and heroin was involved in
  201,000 visits.”
  
  Site has nice graphs. Just cocaine & heroin alone are the same order of magnitude as homicides related to firearms.
  
  http://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/pdf/poison-issue-brief.pdf
  
  Report this comment
- Walkabout
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 8:34am
  SendTheMeteors
  valiant1776, so you’re in favor of the government involuntarily incarcerating people who are “mentally ill?”
  Isn’t that a bit like the Soviet Union? Who decides who is crazy?
  ***
  Getting pretty easy actually “Send the Asteroids”. If the cause of illness is Axis I & the person is harming themselves or others, it is open & shut diagnosis. With a little bit more neuro-science research weaved into psychology it won’t be too hard. You act as though we will never be able to thread the needle. In that case why spend money on psychiatric research? Let’s just call psychiatrists new age priests & be done with it.
  I would add to what neuroscientists & psychologists find (or maybe they will find it) that Paul Krugman will also be labeled insane. Maybe he is not insane & just avaricious & wants his side to win at all costs. But anyone who argues Keynesian economics is the cure all, end all is whacked or purposeful liar.
  
  Report this comment
- poorrichard09
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 8:35am
  Yup, Piers baby, if you don’t like how we do things here GET THE HELL OUT!
  
  Report this comment
- jcldwl
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 8:44am
  Guess we should have just left England on it’s own during those two wars we saved their asses in.
  
  Report this comment
- wayner4162
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 9:21am
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPtPN-pSuco
  
  Report this comment
- mr. parker
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 10:40am
  No, it actually points out how few people have heard of this ignorant, arrogant british subject.
  
  Face east and bow to your queen, just don’t do it when sissyboy Morgan is around.
  
  His name sounds like a failed chain of cheap seafood restaurants,.
  
  Report this comment
- Rokytop
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 11:50am
  @SENDTHEMETEORS I have read your posts and have a major problem with your interpretation of history. The man at the mall was not a cop, he was an ordinary citizen with a concealed weapons permit. Your posts follow the thread that anyone that doesn’t agree with you is not as informed or intelligent as yourself. I say that I’m not the best informed person reading this blog, but I know more than most. Pierce comes from a country that says only the Lords own the game. Men are in jail for shooting burglars that were in their homes. A country that had customs that gave newly married women to the lords of the area. A place rich in the history of chopping off heads for the sport of lords, and kings. The difference between a country with the right of self defense with a firearm is, the difference between being called a citizen and a subject.
  
  Report this comment
- pissantno.10
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 2:33pm
  some spanking to the trolls loved it
  
  Report this comment
- Ballot_Box_Revolution
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 4:24pm
  Enicom…(however you spell it)
  
  “Not once in American history has the use of the 2nd Amendment defended any rights.”
  
  Right to property comes to mind…(Many thefts have been stopped by armed law abiding citizens)
  Right to life comes to mind…..(many lives have been saved by armed law abiding citizen)
  Right of liberty comes to mind…(Take away guns you live in tyranny)
  
  I think that just about encompasses the The Declaration of Independence
  
  Report this comment
- Jive Mickey
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 6:22pm
  “6,600 Americans have currently signed the petition to deport me – meaning 311,993,400 clearly want me to stay”
  All right then, 61,173,739 out of 311,993,400 wanted Obama to be President. Therefore, by Morgan’s reasoning, 250,819,661 … 80.39% didn’t want him to be president. So maybe he should just resign then … Wot?
  If this country is so awful, Morgan should go back to his precious UK Socialist Fantasy Land which has no guns and obviously no crime … just a never ending Nanny State under constant surveillance and hideously ridiculous taxation … where Liverpool street gangs run around with fully automatic GLOCK machine pistols. Flaming twit.
  
  Report this comment
- RobbieTLHughie
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 9:03pm
  The conspiracy-slinging folks here at The Blaze sure do have a regular old elementary school playpen field day with anyone who dare disagree with their almighty view of the world.
  
  lol People are buying guns so the progressive plan has backfired… My stars, that’s a ridiculous statement.
  
  Report this comment
- drbage
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 9:29pm
  Sorry, Piers, I think that 311,993,400 Americans don’t know who you are and really couldn’t care less.
  
  Report this comment
- Trigus
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 11:46pm
  Maybe Piers should get rid of his armed security on the side of him in the picture. When he does that then he can talk to us about firearms.
  
  Report this comment
- Rowgue
  Posted on December 24, 2012 at 12:00am
  Piers doesn’t have a right to free speech. He’s not an american citizen, and he is in violation of his work visa that expired years ago.
  
  Report this comment
- Becks_Art_Obama_In_PeePee
  Posted on December 24, 2012 at 3:25am
  “… the petition states. “We demand that Mr. Morgan be deported immediately for his effort to undermine the Bill of Rights and for exploiting his position as a national network television host to stage attacks against the rights of American citizens.” ”
  
  Of course, no one in Congress or any other part of Washington DC agrees with it. Shocked?
  
  Oh, and while we’re discussing deportations, let’s mention Kenyan-born illegal alien Barack Hussein Obama, AKA Barry Obama, AKA Barry Soetoro?
  http://i3.ytimg.com/bg/jKZugo0aaREqEyqXIzGDVw/102.jpg
  
  Report this comment
- rcampb10
  Posted on December 24, 2012 at 7:06am
  Amen,,Americans better wake up, and ………Stand up. There is a war on our freedom!! Its time to fight back!!
  
  Report this comment
- Bowlz
  Posted on December 24, 2012 at 6:04pm
  Pompous, unappreciative, shallow, arrogant i.e. Piers Morgan, Matthews, O’Brien etc. They’re all the same. Plus, I’ll bet many own guns or have security with guns to protect their weak, hypocritical liberal butts. Napoleon Bloomberg’s security should be removed immediately considering how much he hates guns that don’t protect him. What a collossal example of Daddy Issues, just like all of the elites that think their lives are more worthy than ours/others.
  
  Report this comment
Chrison
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:44pm
While I vehemently disagree with Mr. Morgan’s insane political views, I also vehemently disagree with those who’d have the man deported for expressing his opinion! This is AMERICA folks! Whether Mr. Morgan is a citizen or not, we should respect his right to freely speak his mind even if we absolutely disagree with his point of view. As soon as we start sanctioning someone for expressing an opinion we don’t agree with we open the door for someone to sanction US for OUR opinion!

Either you agree with and honor the First Amendment or you don’t! You CAN’T demand that Mr. Morgan be deported for expressing his stupid opinions regarding gun control unless you’re prepared to accept being punished for expressing YOUR opinion in the future!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- LIBSALWAYSLIE
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:54pm
  True, Piers is a rude, arrogant, pathetic jerk, and I have no respect for him or his opinions. But this is still the USA, and he’s free to be an arrogant, pathetic jerk.
  
  Report this comment
- SunTzuYou
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 5:00pm
  Good for you, while I agree in principle, too many people have died defending the constitutions, and his precious little UK on multiple occasions, to not have a viceral reaction to PM. If PM would like to become a citizen and defend those rights with his life, yes, he would be fully entitled to those rights.
  By the way, come Christmas Day, while free speech will be be the law of the land, it will not be in my home. Family members will not have 1st amendment rights on my property. They will be welcome to enjoy the holiday, but anyone furthering lies and division for personal gain such as PM will be shown the door and have the freedom to leave. IF they don’t leave, my home is not my home, and I will leave myself. PM should likewise humbly consider himself a guest, as should the UN and other visitors, strangers, refugees and illegals. My sincere thanks to remember the high moral ground but I just can’t host one more fool.
  
  Report this comment
- Thedadde
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 5:20pm
  Does a British citizen have U.S. Constitutional, 1st Amendment rights? Nope. None of my directions on all of these Christmas toys say so… Spanish, yes,… I can see it clearly,… so can all of the sheeple… Hint: You don’t get any rights to come here and spew stupid at US… RIGHT MACHMOOD? dUH!
  
  Report this comment
- wasam
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 5:27pm
  The way to “deport” Piers is for everyone to just turn CNN off during the airing of his show. A massive drop in viewership and a drop in CNN ratings would have an effect right away. After all, advertisements purchased depends on a show’s rating. Money talks.
  
  Report this comment
- TH777
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 5:52pm
  He’s a BRITISH citizen, not an AMERICAN citizen so…..if he doesn’t like the American Way then it’s time for him to go home. It amazes me how many people come to this Country to flee what ever Country they are from and then they try to change things here. GO HOME!!
  
  Report this comment
- Gladius_Doctorae
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 5:56pm
  @Chrisson/libsalwaystry
  
  DI-DI-DI…wrong answer! You half baked morons, Ill bet you’d let that pissant vote too wouldnt you? Send that limey redcoat packing.
  
  Report this comment
- All Pro
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 5:59pm
  We want him deported for his arrogant, condescending, disparaging, un-American comments on pretty much everything. In the mean time he’s here enjoying the fruits of our labor while constantly telling us we’re doing it all wrong. He wants us to be free like England……..wait…….what!
  America – love it or leave it.
  Don’t let the door hit ya were the good Lord split ya.
  
  Report this comment
- Platonician
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 6:30pm
  “This is AMERICA folks!”
  
  What about all those American children persecuted by communist teachers for expressing their conservative or Christian views? Teachers that share the same socialist ideology than Piers Morgan!!
  
  Report this comment
- Houdini1953
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 6:40pm
  Well while you do have the freedom of speech as originally penned by the forefathers of the United States it was meant to allow political views to be uttered without reprisal from those of a differing opinion, there are restrictions or laws against certain speech such as using “fighting words” which would cause another who hears your views to cause you bodily harm or even death as a matter of honor of themselves or family or of course yelling “FIRE” in a crowded theater or other public event that would cause panic and yes you can say anything you want but there are also consequences like getting your **** stomped for an insult.
  
  Report this comment
- tbeachhead
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 7:49pm
  The nation that barred Michael Savage for speaking his mind can receive Piers back in full honors. Piers is mistaking the rights of a Citizen of this nation with the universal rights of man. He can go back and enjoy getting arrested for exercising those rights where he confused the meaning of freedom in the first place. I never do petitions…ever. I made an exception for the foreigner that wants to mess with my Constitution.
  
  Report this comment
- HappyConservative
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 7:44am
  The First Amendment right only applies to U.S. Citizens. Not some jerk who comes to America to make a profit from slamming our Constitution.
  
  Report this comment
- Ballot_Box_Revolution
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 6:01pm
  I agree with you to a certain extent….where I disagree with you is he is not a citizen of the USA, just a guest, and he is disrespecting and attacking our Constitution. Guests can leave if they are not happy with the arrangements.
  
  And on top of that it is our duty (At least as a voter in my state) to protect and defend our US and State Constitutions. When you sign the voter registration, that pledge is right there with your signature. I think citizens coming to the conclusion that this non citizen is a danger to our constitution and put together a petition to deport him, is a much better route than lynching or jailing.
  
  Report this comment
NigelTufnel
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:37pm
The left can yammer all they want about gun control and other issues. Go ahead and let them pass gun legislation. Implementing it has shown difficult in the past. Our govnernment passes a bunch of crap but can never seem to follow through with execution of the laws. Just like Obamacare. It’s so ambiguous that the desired outcome will be far worse than what we started with. About the only thing Obamacare will accomplish is to add about 20,000 new government jobs. It’s a complete joke. I have more guns than I need. They will never get them going door to door. The best they could do is ban the sale of ammuntion. OOOOh. Most people already have re-loaders and then the black market will begin. We’ll get our ammo from somewhere. We on the right need to start letting the left hang. As shown this week Boehner can do little from where he stands. Let the country go over the cliff. Obama signed that agreement last spring to get his debt ceiling deal. The right will get blamed no matter what. The right will always find away to protect itself because we are far more self sufficient. Let Morgan rant. I don’t really care. I know what I’m gonna do. SURVIVE!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- NHwinter
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:45pm
  Mr. Morgan can rant all he wants, but he may need a gun if he returns to England as it looks like the Islamists are taking over his country.
  
  Report this comment
christhefanatic
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:36pm
Put glasses on this fellow and he would look like Michael Moore when he was only a wee piglet.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Thedadde
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 5:27pm
  And a ******. Good luck pm’ey… more lib news doomed…
  
  Report this comment
- jollyroger62
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 7:10pm
  Hey he’s a British citizen the first amendment doesn’t applyto him. Go back home euro trash.
  
  Report this comment
myrwo6
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:34pm
Thats the thing with these British a=holes. They think that their so much smarter than the average American. You can see their aurora of smugness. Sometimes I wonder if their still sore about the Revolutionary War. Morgan is not very smart if he concludes that the Americans that didn’t sign the petition agree with his position. What an A-hole!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- planecrashlaw
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 6:02pm
  You might want to understand the use of “they’re” vs. “their,” before you accuse someone of not being very smart. It kind of defeats your point.
  
  Report this comment
KevINtampa
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:29pm
Pierce, you have a right to your speech. But, as a guest of our country, understand that you are also responsible for your speech. No one here is saying that you should be jailed. Jailing you or otherwise confining you in say an NDAA mandate, would be a violation of your free speech. However, you are still a guest, and telling you that you have worn out your welcome because of your rights grabbing speech is not a violation of your speech, just a consequence. Now I’ll say this as politely as possible, please, go back to the country that has seen an 89% increase in violent crime since its government took the guns out of good people’s hands.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- RJJinGadsden
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:40pm
  KEVINTAMPA, I have to admit that I fell for that too at first and believed what you say is in the NDAA. After some research I found that no such thing exists regarding the holding of citizens as so many keep saying. The only mention of the taking and maintaining prisoners mentioned in the NDAA regards ONLY enemy combatants. That being said, there is the recently updated Executive Order where the holding of American Citizens does exist. The EO goes back to the Eisenhower Admin that I am aware of, and has been updated every so many years by sitting presidents. While updates were questionable during the Clinton Admin, this again occurred at about the same time as the NDAA was going through the legislature. There may be other problems with the National Defense Authorization Act as written, but that is not in it at all.
  
  Report this comment
- guz75
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 5:01pm
  ’89% increase in violent crime since its government took the guns out of good people’s hands.’
  
  What a load of cr*p. please provide a link to a reputable source for that figure!
  
  Report this comment
- Calv017
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 8:43pm
  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/5712573/UK-is-violent-crime-capital-of-Europe.html this one gives the figure of 77% rise in some crimes. I’ve seen the source that says 89% and shared it on my facebook but don’t have it open at the moment, It was posted hours ago. Also here’s another tidbit http://www.murderuk.com/mass_murderers.html This is a list of mass murderers in UK over the years organized by number of victims. Thought gun control was meant to abolish this kind of thing. Oh wait, black market sales of guns, Criminals still get guns. There you go links to a couple of spots, and with a google search more can be found.
  
  Report this comment
Gonzo
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:28pm
Hey Piers, if it weren’t for American guns, your accent would be German…punk.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- The-Monk
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:50pm
  Welcome back Gonzo…. you’ve been missed.
  
  Merry Christmas !!!
  
  Report this comment
- DadRocked
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 5:18pm
  Ditto to The-Monk…
  Welcome back Gonzo
  
  Report this comment
- Walkabout
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 5:21pm
  A little known fact is that the staff & executives at CNN all signed the petition.
  
  With Piers deported, they hope to get CNN’s ratings up.
  
  Report this comment
- Glennda
  Posted on December 23, 2012 at 10:24am
  GONZO . . .Yes, sorely missed.
  
  Report this comment
IronHamster
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:26pm
What it really means is 311,993,400 clearly have no clue who he is. Pierce who?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
DougHuffman
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:23pm
YES, deport Piers Morgan, and not just for his anti-gun opinion, but also his abuse of our bully-pulpit with his anti-freedom soviet crap.

My apologies to HRH, his gramma. Take him over your knee, Madam, an whale the tar out of him. Then we’ll paint him with the hot tar, apply feathers and ride him back to you on a rail – sharp edge up.

We the People at WhiteHouse.gov does not publicise its computer requirements as I cannot log in or send a complaint feedback. I did sign and see my approval of the Wisconsin secession petition.

They probably think I’m gonna use g00gle/micro$ explorer – Phui!

Good people ought to be armed as they will, with wits and Guns and the Truth. God Bless Bitter Clingers, damn know-nothings, progressives.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Monica2
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:22pm
Typical latte sucking progressive liberal, demanding his right to free speech whilst calling for the destruction of the second ammendment. Frankly I am sick to death of Eurotrash socialist’s living life large in the west, they like socialism so much go the fork home loony lefty.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
christhefanatic
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:21pm
More likely the people who sign the petition will be deported.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- M13
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:35pm
  More people have signed the petition than watch his idiotic show.
  
  Report this comment
uflygirl
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:18pm
Signed. Go Home Mr. Morgan never liked you and your really liberal views and how you tried to take apart Kirk Cameron on the views from the bible. You are annoying.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Thighmaster
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:18pm
As a matter of fact the US Constitution protects US Citizens, no one else. Just as the Constitution doesn’t protect us in other countries, it doesn’t protect foreign citizens visiting the United States. I don’t know where this notion ever originated.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Thedadde
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 5:26pm
  iT originates with the idiots [in the media] who think that they are now somehow part of the ruling elite, who vacation in Hawaii while Rome burns intentionally to the ground. The elite won’t need them, much longer, since they can tell US, THEMSELVES… what WE will do… read Agenda 21.
  
  Report this comment
DadRocked
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:15pm
FOLKS – Sign if you want but I for one will deny the WH of having any relation to me in ANY way and that includes my ISP for their records…
Sure they can get it if they want to but I will avoid offering it to them…

Like a crook, you can secure your belongings but if they really want it… They’ll take it…
Why make it easier for the WH?

And if you do sign one of their ‘petitions’, what good is it going to do anyway?
Send the many signatures to your state/federal representative…

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- DadRocked
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:28pm
  U.S. Govt Gathering Information and Data
  Don’t any of you remember your comments to the many articles on this subject?
  Here’s just a few…
  NSA Whistleblower Says The Feds Are Gathering Data On Nearly Every US Citizen
  Binney worked for the Defense Department’s foreign signals intelligence agency for 32 years before resigning in late 2001 because he “could not stay after the NSA began purposefully violating the Constitution,” according to a statement he made in court records.
  http://www.businessinsider.com/nsa-whistleblower-says-the-government-is-gathering-data-on-every-us-citizen-2012-7
  
  Cops Want Congress to Force Wireless Providers to Store At Least 2 Years of Your Private Text Messages In Case They Need Them Later http://www.theblaze.com/stories/cops-want-congress-to-force-wireless-providers-to-store-at-least-2-years-of-your-private-text-messages-in-case-they-need-them-later/
  
  Is an Obscure U.N. Agency Plotting a Global Internet Coup? http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/is-an-obscure-u-n-agency-plotting-a-global-internet-coup/
  
  If You Have a Yahoo! Email Account and Value Your Privacy, You Will Want to Read This http://www.theblaze.com/stories/if-you-have-a-yahoo-email-account-and-value-your-privacy-you-will-want-to-read-this/
  
  Report this comment
- qpwillie
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:33pm
  Amen, DadRocked!! It will be a cold day in hell when I submit my name, email, location, etc. to a website on the server at whitehouse.gov.
  
  Report this comment
- myrwo6
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:58pm
  Funny. Your reasoning is exactly why we have the 2nd amendment. Ironic, huh?
  
  Report this comment
- TheFrost
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 5:01pm
  All email is sniffed by the CIA. It’s been theirs since your first send. I signed today and still need to renew my NRA membership.
  
  Report this comment
- DadRocked
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 5:25pm
  TheFrost – Have at it… All that my original comment stated was “Sure they can get it if they want to but I will avoid offering it to them…”
  
  Report this comment
- DadRocked
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 7:19pm
  myrwo6 – “Your reasoning is exactly why we have the 2nd amendment. Ironic, huh?”
  It will be a cold day in hell when most of us give up ANY of our Constitutional rights.
  
  Irony… Nope… The rights given to US as U.S. citizens and they are rights to fight for !
  
  Report this comment
TSUNAMI_22
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:14pm
Here’s another petition that needs signature. Please sign.

http://www.change.org/petitions/whitehouse-push-legislation-that-allows-teachers-to-concealed-carry-2?utm_source=guides&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=petition_created

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
joannariv
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:12pm
Where can I sign this petition? This guy and his views make me sick.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- TSUNAMI_22
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:26pm
  https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/deport-british-citizen-piers-morgan-attacking-2nd-amendment/prfh5zHD
  
  Report this comment
ZAP
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:08pm
The BRITISH tried this before and got thrown out …..

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- ZAP
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:15pm
  Anybody got a link for the vote?
  
  Report this comment
- TheFrost
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:57pm
  https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/deport-british-citizen-piers-morgan-attacking-2nd-amendment/prfh5zHD
  
  Report this comment
resme
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:07pm
Hes from Britain, Living in the USA, and wants strict gun laws, right? Easy solution: Go back to Britain, Redcoat.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
aproudinfidel
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:07pm
No, Piers, it means that most Americans haven’t seen the petition. Why don’t you just do the right thing and go back to Britain, or hell, or wherever it is that you came from. You are a disgusting pig, every bit on a par with Michael Moore.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
BODYBAG
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:07pm
“Morgan acknowledged the petition on Twitter Saturday, tweeting at one point: “6,600 Americans have currently signed the petition to deport me – meaning 311,993,400 clearly want me to stay. Thank you.”

That last part of Piers snarky response is just more of his liberal bulls**t lies.

“……meaning 311,993,400 clearly want me to stay. Thank you.”

No. It DOES NOT “clearly” mean that —- 99.9% of that 311,993,400 dont know about the petition, so
no, they dont “clearly want you to stay”. If they DID know many would likely sign up to boot your
dumb @ss.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
All Pro
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:06pm
Go get him Alex Jones!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- dissentnow
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 5:00pm
  INFOWARS!
  
  Give ‘em hell, Alex!
  
  Report this comment
justangry
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:03pm
That’s awesome. LOL

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
aproudinfidel
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:03pm
In the “good old days” an as*hole like him would have gotten tarred and feathered. Is it too late for that?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
SocialistSlayer
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:02pm
That I would like to see – This British POS deported ! But I’m not sure the Brits want him back either !

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Jenny Lind
Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:01pm
I’ll sign. Sick of this guy, and his disdain for our rights.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Kupo
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:14pm
  But he’s also correct that his speech is protected under the first amendment.
  
  Report this comment
- fremontdad
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 4:23pm
  Hey Kupo, the Amendments, or in your view, the 1st Amendment, is meant for American Citizens, not some nitwit from another country trying to undermine Our Freedom.
  
  Report this comment
- Teufel Hunden
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 5:32pm
  @KUPO: “But he’s also correct that his speech is protected under the first amendment” which ironically is guaranteed by the second amendment.
  
  Report this comment
- Kupo
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 11:05pm
  Fremontdad
  
  Wrong. The amendments are applicable to all. Non-citizens are even allowed to buy guns, believe it or not!
  
  Report this comment
- Kupo
  Posted on December 22, 2012 at 11:06pm
  Teufel Hunden
  
  Doesn’t matter. There is nothing illegal about speaking out against the U.S. government! That is EXACTLY WHY the 1st Amendment is so important!
  
  Report this comment

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.