
(Photo: AP)
The Boston Globe published an article Saturday detailing the missteps of 2012 Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney’s campaign, from Ohio predictions to the much-discussed 47% remarks.
The entire article– which amounts to roughly 6 pages– is gaining traction on the Internet, but the focus seems to be Tagg Romney’s pronunciation that his father “had no desire” to be president.
After a discussion of Romney’s “private nature” and how he was more comfortable keeping his good deeds out of the spotlight, Tagg described his father’s reluctance to run for office.
Via the Boston Globe:
More than being reticent, Romney was at first far from sold on a second presidential run. Haunted by his 2008 loss, he initially told his family he would not do it. While candidates often try to portray themselves as reluctant, Tagg insisted his father’s stance was genuine.
“He wanted to be president less than anyone I’ve met in my life. He had no desire to . . . run,” said Tagg, who worked with his mother, Ann, to persuade his father to seek the presidency. “If he could have found someone else to take his place . . . he would have been ecstatic to step aside. He is a very private person who loves his family deeply and wants to be with them, but he has deep faith in God and he loves his country, but he doesn’t love the attention.” [Emphasis added]
The Atlantic considers the statement in an article titled “Mitt’s Son Said He Never Wanted to Be President Anyway”:
So, yeah, that might explain why Mitt lost. Not wanting the job you need to publicly campaign for more than a year to get is step one in the “Not Getting Elected Guide for Dummies” book. Again, the rest of the mammoth piece, which you really should read, paints a larger picture of the struggle between Mitt’s inner circle and his campaign advisors over whether they should humanize Mitt, which was ultimately their downfall. And, also, the Obama campaign had more staff and cooler tech stuff, like an app named Gordon, ”after the person who punched Houdini in the stomach shortly before the magician died,” and Narwhal, named after the Internet’s favorite arctic whale.
Another of Mitt Romney’s sons, Matt, told Conan O’Brien back in June that while the family wasn’t eager to launch another national campaign, running in 2012 was “the right thing” to do for the country.





















































































































Comments (157)
rene demonteverde
Dec. 23, 2012 at 7:25pmSo why did he ran ? The recent Presidential elections was more to save the country from another four years of Obama. Why did he not just withdraw before it is too late. There were others who were willing
to sacrifice for the sake of the nation, and who might have won. Romney entered the fray lukewarm it
it seems. Problems with Republicans is that they have no spine.My respect for this spineless and
gutless jellyfish dip further upon knowing this. We all lost because of this wimp.
Report this comment
Simonne
Dec. 23, 2012 at 7:54pmHe ran because he wanted to save this country. I’m still sad over the loss as he is a good man & it’s too bad so many Republicans stayed home instead of voting. He was the best candidate that the Republican had because the others wouldn’t have came close. Too many extremists & Gingrich had more baggage, plus not the best temperament.
Report this comment
encinom
Dec. 23, 2012 at 8:51pmMitt’s response to his son’s comments….
http://www.youtube.com/user/schmoyoho
Report this comment
thop1960
Dec. 24, 2012 at 9:36amThat is the right attitude to have, not wanting to be president but feeling a need out of love of country to do it. That is the attitude George Washington and other great presidents had. I am not putting Romney in that catagory but he may have wound up being a great president, we’ll never know thanks to many conservatives staying home this election. Thank you very much for that, you are great Americans, your love of country is showing as well. Not.
Report this comment
Silvertruth
Dec. 24, 2012 at 11:00amWe all lost because we let friends and neighbors be outright lied to and mislead by perceptions that were created out of whole cloth.
Mitt Romney’s failure in his campaign was not responding forcefully enough to the lies given about him. It was also an organizational loss, Obama’s campaign exploited it’s base to perfection, the Republican base was almost absent this election because they just didn’t feel like showing up for Romney, either out of bias against his faith (I know a few people that wouldn’t vote for him because of his being Mormon, utterly stupid and bigoted if you ask me.) or because he wasn’t Libertarian/Coservative enough (also stupid because he’s a heckuva lot more that bend than Obama is).
Had everyone that voted for McCain/Palin voted for Romney/Ryan, plus the independents he won away from Obama, he would be President.
Romney is far from spineless, he’s a nice and honorable man at heart, with a degree of human intelligence that our current President completely lacks.
It takes courage and strength to run for President. Even more so when you don’t want the Celebrity that goes with it. That’s really what Tagg was saying.
We all lost because we get the government we deserve and when we can’t stand up for the honest guy, we deserve the dishonest one.
Report this comment
simpletony
Dec. 24, 2012 at 12:33pmWhy did he “ran?” Yes, you’re fully qualified to be a dumbocrat
Report this comment
simpletony
Dec. 24, 2012 at 12:38pmran?
Report this comment
Digerati
Dec. 24, 2012 at 1:18pmNo, Rene, we all lost because of media propaganda and because the majority of Americans are stupid and view politics as a team sport or reality TV. To most people, it isn’t about the best man for the job, but who the media says is best—whether it is a lie or not—and who has the best “Jon Stewart” put downs. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve talked with liberals who think Obama’s bayonets-and-horses quip was a highlight of the final debate, in spite of the fact that Obama was wrong and we DO have more bayonets today than we did back in those wacky olden days.
Romney lost because people either failed to vote, or failed to understand what the last 4 years have meant to the prosperity of our country and our liberties. Don’t blame Romney because the majority of us Americans can’t stand up to our solemn civic duties with intelligence and respect. WE as a people failed this year and WE as a people will reap the rewards of our ignorance and indolence.
Report this comment
Brother Winston Smith
Dec. 24, 2012 at 1:59pmHad enough?
The Constitution Party.
The Libertarian Party.
State nullification.
NOW!!!!!!!!
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Dec. 24, 2012 at 10:26pmtagg romney is the new meghan mccain!
Report this comment
Deuteronomy22
Dec. 25, 2012 at 3:34amWhy did he “ran”? I like the idiots who never had a typo error. There is no edit function on this site. Get off of your high horses and back to your deserved position under the tail.
Report this comment
Eternal Lucy
Dec. 26, 2012 at 8:24pmSILVERTRUTH, I think you stated it exactly right! Totally agree with you.
Report this comment
Hunter10
Jan. 3, 2013 at 3:14amHe agreed to run because he is the most accomplished and talented person to run for the presidency since Thomas Jefferson. I am confident that a Romney presidency could have gone a long way toward restoring our country to its founding principles.
Report this comment
Ghandi was a Republican
Dec. 23, 2012 at 7:22pmThe real part of this story is “If he could have found someone to take his place, he would have” Well– He was on stage with about 8 of them. Newt would have destroyed obama following him around to every campaign event, 4 hours behind, ANYWHERE challenging him to Lincoln/Douglas debates, mano a mano. Absolutely ripped the feaux clothing off the false emperor. Newt would have gotten all the free press he needed to pummel the obama campaign. Newt understands Alinsky, better than the Alinsky radicals understand it. One step ahead always. FLying by wire he would have eviscerated and reduced the obama campaign to trying to cling to even the most gerrymandered districts~!
Report this comment
HappyConservative
Dec. 23, 2012 at 7:45pmNo, the media would have destroyed Gingrich over the fidelity issues just like they did Herman Cain. Anyone who opposes a democrat as President is not up against that candidate. They are up against NBC/ABC/CBS/CNN/MSNBC. Obama is the least experienced, least qualified candidate to ever run and this time around he had absolutely the most failed record of any standing president. But from the left-leaning officiating of the debates to a complete and utter failure for the media to pursue Fast and Furious, Benghazi, failing unemployment rates, etc… – he got re-elected. Dems could offer up a convict as a candidate and the MSM would sell their souls to get him elected – the only qualification is the “D” after the name..
Unless the MSM is shut down, the GOP and any other opposing party to the “Communist regime” is dead in it’s tracks.
~~ Texas – Secede ~~
Report this comment
drs1969
Dec. 23, 2012 at 9:00pmGingrich could have won. He’s tough and from the South. That’s why the RNC shut him out, they only want their own kind in DC.
Report this comment
starman70
Dec. 24, 2012 at 8:13am@DRS1969:
You hit the nail right on the head!!!!! The RNC is truly a “GOOD OLE BOYS PARTY” and has no desire to reform the Washington establishment. STATUS QUO, with a slightly different twist is their true mantra. In fact, I’m not sure that they picked Romney because they, the party heirarchy, wanted him to lose. They are all elitests and all adhere to the very tenets of big government and total control by the Washington and United Nations. Odummer fits that to a “T” and they really didn’t want to rock the boat but just put on a big show to try to convince the public they were for change. The Republican leadership is nothing more than a bunch of hypocrites.
NEWT in 2016!!!!
Report this comment
davecorkery
Dec. 24, 2012 at 9:00amWrong. Gingrich is an idiot who has been able to fool the fools, but not the rest of us.
Report this comment
TROONORTH
Dec. 24, 2012 at 9:16am“Gingrich is an idiot who has been able to fool the fools, but not the rest of us.”
There is always the possibility that ‘the rest of you’ are not bright enough to understand him. As someone once stated, it is impossible for a person of lesser intelligence to recognize the brilliance of a greater mind. ( I think it was Einstein but I’m not sure!!)
Brettfan
Dec. 24, 2012 at 12:00pmGingrich blows. He supported health care mandates, amnesty and was endorsing Rinos in liberal states. He supported a nut bag called Alvin Toffler who believed in ending the capitalistic system and government in a third way plan. He also was MIA, after having to drop out of Congress over some affairs in 1998, from politics. He could have run much earlier and taken on Obama in 2008. The guy whined about Romney when he couldn’t beat him and did not drop out to help Santorum. Newt might have had some good debates, but he couldn’t beat Romney or Santorum.
Report this comment
JONVIL
Dec. 23, 2012 at 7:01pmAnyone who WANTS to be President has got to be nuts…or power hungry.
The only person I would vote for is the one who did not want to run!!!
If Romney ran again I would vote for him.
Report this comment
kickagrandma
Dec. 23, 2012 at 7:08pmYou had your chance.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Dec. 23, 2012 at 7:09pmI call BS.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Dec. 23, 2012 at 7:10pmI mean BS on this statement, ““He wanted to be president less than anyone I’ve met in my life. He had no desire to . . . run,” “
Report this comment
Walkabout
Dec. 23, 2012 at 7:15pmPretty much.
I would hire someone (i.e. vote) who did not really care to be president but had the managerial, executive & decision making skills. And the proper morals.
Report this comment
Ghandi was a Republican
Dec. 23, 2012 at 7:15pmGW – George Washington didn’t want it. He only took it through a sense of duty. He had not been to his own home for a Month total over 5 years. He was freezing with his troops.
Now here is another truth. Part of the alinsky scheme is to make it unbearable using the power of a hijacked press to demean and destroy their opponents.
Can anyone even quantify the amount of threats to destroy, manufacture lies and innuendo, force into IRS courts, invent scandals when the alinsky left has the IRS, CIA, FBI at their disposal?
I am at the point that I will gladly start chopping heads off if these people come anywhere near me.
know what they are;. I know what they want, I know that I will not stand being made a part of it!
We are at war, like it a\or not. It’s not even an undeclared war. It’s out in the open. They advertise it, write about it, make speeches about it. The only part of it that isn’t declaring it is the “press” they use to deny it to the mases.
Report this comment
Captain Crunch
Dec. 23, 2012 at 7:21pmShould have been Jim Perry with Sarah Palin. Time for a new party. Republicans are near sighted and Libertarians are radical leftists in disguise. We are up **** creek without a paddle. Time to increase the supply of bibles, guns, and food.
Report this comment
FunFunFun
Dec. 23, 2012 at 7:36pmTotally agree with you.
Like Washington, Romney felt a sense of duty to provide the Nation a chance to save ourselves by getting on with “the Right to Work.” But, the Nation said, “Nah, there are still some Freebies to be taken. Maybe later, when we are really in trouble.”
Oh, sorry, I forgot, the Freebie takers don’t really think longer than 1 week. Never mind.
We are in deep trouble.
Report this comment
simpletony
Dec. 24, 2012 at 12:37pmMe too, and there are a lot of us who know he’d have saved the country from certain death
Report this comment
AmericaMustBeFree
Dec. 24, 2012 at 1:18pmI am with you! I would rather a humble man with character, morals and values run the country, than one who deceives, lies and purposely destroys America and its people!
Report this comment
KevINtampa
Dec. 25, 2012 at 1:42amAs a Libertarian I also want to stop federal foreign aid. If the people of Florida want to give to Somalia, South Korea, Egypt, or Israel let Floridians vote for representatives that will direct Florida revenue funds to these countries.
Basically, let the government nearest the people have the most authority in the governance as our founders clearly stated.
Again we are 50 independent states united by only a few words in the constitution. It’s time we had the central government respect that.
How anyone can call that radically left, or radically right, is far beyond me. People who say things like that have zero clue what the Libertarian party actually stands for; and their only knowledge of the party is obtained in Fox News or MSNBC soundbites.
Report this comment
Ghandi was a Republican
Dec. 23, 2012 at 6:58pmGo ahead blaze. Take an out of context headline off the feeds why don’t you? Is anybody home over here. Are we reduced to repeating alinsky-ized propaganda made to ridicule and demean
The U.S. would not be in this mess if there never was such a thing as a pelosi. reid OR obama. They have been engaged in sabotage and destruction for 7 years (congress and potus).
There is a truthful headline.
Report this comment
starman70
Dec. 24, 2012 at 8:37amThis subversion of the principles that America was founded on has been ongoing for one hundred years or more. We are now only beginning to see the fruits of this. Leftists, Liberals and outright Communists in charge of Public Schools, Colleges and Universities and Labor Unions both industrial and governmental are indoctrinating citizens from their first days of school.
Kruschev was right when he said that America would fall, not to outside invasion but to its own internal policies.
Report this comment
Keatonc333
Dec. 24, 2012 at 1:31pmOut of context headlines make up 96.5% of all headlines on the blaze!
Report this comment
worldwatcher
Dec. 23, 2012 at 6:40pmI see no reason why this is even “news”. Obama won due to uninformed voters, parasite citizens, and immigrants who want the fast track for themselves and their families. It was a dirty, ugly campaign. Why Tagg Romney even brought this up is beyond me. Mitt Romney would have been a great president. At least we could count on him to do SOMETHING. Obama’s “victory” was a done deal even before the election. This race was all about race. Alan West said that if Obama wins, America deserves what she gets. We still have Pelosi and Reid. Nothing is going to get done.
Report this comment
encinom
Dec. 23, 2012 at 6:54pmObama’s victory was a triumph of intelligence over ignorance, tolerance over bigotry and compassion over cold heartedness.
The GOP offered nothing but paranoid fears to an aging, white populace, Obama sought to engage all Americans.
Report this comment
CunningLawyer
Dec. 23, 2012 at 7:00pmI completely agree, what a missed opportunity our country has passed up. Mitt Romney would have been the right person at the right time. The complete opposite of Obama and his horrid cast of criminals he surrounds himself with and always has. Obama is a thug. He disgusts me the way he only knows how to bully and push people around, threaten. He matches his supporters well but not those of us who remember a real kinder gentler time and a wonderful America that would have been appalled at such a person.
Report this comment
HappyConservative
Dec. 23, 2012 at 7:31pm@ Encinom. Obama is a lying treasonous coward. His entire campaign was based on lies that the mainstream media refused to call out on. He single-handedly has the blood of American servicemen on his hands but because the media protects him, it gets dropped. I’m pretty sure your pal George Soros paid off vote counters in the swing states to the tune of millions. And the rest of the votes came from stupid people like yourself who get all of your political info from MSNBC and Hollywood! I do not believe that Americans voted this a-hole in and certainly not any with a clue. He will meet his end early, I predict….And I will rejoice.
Report this comment
drs1969
Dec. 23, 2012 at 9:06pmHussein won because of the FEDERAL RESERVE, Obama’s Stash, buying up the $1 Trillion deficit. This is why we’re paying over $3 a gallon. They get their gas fo’ free and can vote multiple times while honest people are at work.
Report this comment
13th Imam
Dec. 23, 2012 at 9:19pmObama’s New American Norms
9 % unemployment
a 16 +++++ national debt
a violent arab spring
a black taker class he can call on for instant support
the moron vote
$ at 0-1% interest that nobody wants to take
gas at a new norm of 3.50- 4.00 $ per gallon
hispanics that want to join the taker class
eliminate the rich
then eliminate the middle class
Report this comment
CloudNine
Dec. 23, 2012 at 10:42pm@ Encinom –
Great – Enema (aka Encinom) is back! Just what we need. I am surprised you are still alive over these past several years. Is it hard to breathe with your head up your “arse”? For those of you unfamiliar with this quack, ignore “it”. There is never any relevance to “it’s” comments! You still have the Rod Serling “Fathead” on your wall, Mr. Enema?
Report this comment
simpletony
Dec. 24, 2012 at 12:40pmRight on.
Report this comment
Keatonc333
Dec. 24, 2012 at 1:35pmEncinom… Perfect post! as usual
Report this comment
yiska8
Dec. 24, 2012 at 7:31pm@encinom/keaton
Obama manufactured a win. He bought off his well fed govt. sheep with free phones, free food, free housing, free money, and free birth control.
The TAKERS won, the MAKERS have lost the nation. And they are leaving in droves. The nation is toast at the hands of the uber tolerant, intelligent, warm-hearted good intentions of the American Democrat Leftists. Remember what happened at the end of “Atlas Shrugged”? I’m sure you’ve read it being the ultra brainiacs that the Left always produces.
Lights Out America.
Report this comment
Digerati
Dec. 25, 2012 at 1:21am@Encinom Hahahaha! That’s the funniest thing I’ve heard all day. Obama supporters . . . intelligent. Good one!
I guess going for more dismal unemployment rates is “intelligent” and “engaging.” I guess lies like “I called Benghazi terrorism in the Rose Garden, check the transcript,” and “The sequester isn’t going to happen,” are informed. I guess re-electing the demonstrably worst president in U.S. history is the new “smart.”
I guess in a world of greedy, leftist buffoons, the man with one firing brain cell is king.
Report this comment
quiltgal
Dec. 23, 2012 at 6:10pmTagg’s description of his father does not fit the rumors that Mitt Romney ran because he felt he was entitled to the Presidency, being next up in the good ol’ boy Republican line. Instead he apparently ran because, when called upon, he felt it was his duty. This is admirable and I have no reason to believe it’s not true. Unfortunately, the triple forces of public ignorance, media conspiracy, and the cult of personality surrounding Obama were too much for him to overcome. Hopefully America will come to its senses some day and favor admirable, strong leaders like Romney instead of double-talking phonies. I believe his defeat was America’s failing, not Romney’s.
Report this comment
Lar5
Dec. 23, 2012 at 6:20pmIf you believe Tagg the Romney campaign was an insult to all the citizens of this country. You do no run for president for the “hell of it”
Report this comment
Mutiny
Dec. 23, 2012 at 6:31pmI believe you are completely incorrect.
Romney’s loss was completely his fault. His liberal progressive past and his complete lack of spine on real issues cost the election.
Did he ever bash Obama on,
Benghazi?
The FED?
The NDAA?
Wiretapping?
Killing American citizens without a trial?
Abortion?
GUN FREAKING CONTROL!!!!!!!!!???????
Real spending cuts?
No, because there was not a nickles worth of difference between these two losers.
Report this comment
Dolley
Dec. 23, 2012 at 7:02pmI don’t think we’ll find another with the integrity of Romney.
We probably didn’t deserve him.
Report this comment
Mutiny
Dec. 23, 2012 at 7:18pmIntegrity? Really?
Where was it when he was supporting abortion for decades?
Spineless is the best way to describe Romney.
Report this comment
revelation2012
Dec. 23, 2012 at 5:55pmanyone with minute ‘spark’ of the spirit IN them know better,,,
Report this comment
revelation2012
Dec. 23, 2012 at 6:02pmIF his being President had been the WILL of ‘The Father’ ‘it’ would have BEEN
nothing that the global elites or neo cons could have done would have prevented,,,
Report this comment
waspanglosaxon
Dec. 23, 2012 at 5:50pmIf all these people like Dole, Juan McCain and Romney didn’t wanna win, then they never should have run. Let some real American like Ron Paul have the nomination, who might have won, had he gotten it.
Report this comment
OperationNorthwoods
Dec. 23, 2012 at 5:41pmJust another ringer like Dole or McCain. He was promoted to lose so the overall agenda would move forward at this time. When Obama is done another chosen one will appear to move the agenda forward. Republican or Democrat the New World Order agenda moves forward.
Report this comment
Mutiny
Dec. 23, 2012 at 5:46pmThe lack of desire to be president was clear. He never wanted to win. He was a puppet.
Report this comment
NOT A CRAZY
Dec. 23, 2012 at 5:52pmYup, yup.
Report this comment
SciPro
Dec. 23, 2012 at 5:26pmWow .. I can’t believe how some of your comments have been so short-sighted and mean! .. Any “Real” good man such as Mitt, made the decision reluctantly, that is true because he really had ‘no’ hidden agenda. Other than to ‘do’ the “right” thing, which was to bring sense to American politics, and attempt to free Americans from the tremendous debt load that “bad” politicians foisted upon them. He saw the handwriting on the wall, and ‘reluctantly’ stepped-in, true. However once that decision was made, He put his whole heart into the ‘Constitutional way’ for the sake of his country, and to get America out from the thumb of their debtors. How hard is that to understand? If any criticizers here that can do any better … well get at it, and if we don’t like it .. we’ll unload on you!
Report this comment
Julinka
Dec. 23, 2012 at 5:35pmWell said.
Report this comment
chicago76
Dec. 23, 2012 at 5:41pmAfter destroying all competitors in the Republican party with his political machine, now he comes out saying he did not want to run for president. What an as*h**e? Did someone force him to run? Romney proves himself with this article to be a worthless piece of s**t. He ran hot to win the nomination and then when it came right down to it he ran to lose.
Report this comment
NOT A CRAZY
Dec. 23, 2012 at 5:51pmWasn’t it obvious that his heart wasn’t really in it? He didn’t even have a fighting chance until he got lucky in the first debate. Then he followed that up with lackluster performances in the next debates. He could have easily kicked B.O. up one side and down the other but instead he copped out and took the elitist easy way out. I thought he was going to pull a McCain and start calling B.O. his friend over and over. If they really wanted the presidencey they would have pick a good strong conservative for VP that would have rallied everyone like Sarah Palin did.
Report this comment
CunningLawyer
Dec. 23, 2012 at 7:09pmI completely agree with you. What he meant was that he wasn’t looking forward to the public thrashing he knew was going to happen, the false accusations, the piling on by the thug machine that is the Democratic party. The absurdity of the entire mess that is the electorate now, the nightmare of the Obama campaign managers making up stuff about him and his family. The narrow minded idiots who object to his being a Mormon. We will never have such a fine person as Mitt Romney sully themselves for the likes of the creeps who live in third world America now. Enjoy Obama for life, especially those of you who stayed home and pouted and sickly call Romney and Obama the same. What juveniles. BTW, if God didn’t want Mitt to be president, for those of you putting that out there, it would be because He wanted to spare him from the lunacy of it and use him for some other fine purpose rather than put up with the undereducated, the overly educated but never wise degenerate, bigoted lowlife, low IQ occupants of America we have now.
Report this comment
Brettfan
Dec. 24, 2012 at 11:54am@chicago76 Amen This bozo should have stepped aside and let another person win.
Report this comment
DougHuffman
Dec. 23, 2012 at 5:24pmThe TEA Partiers will go the way of the Republicans and RINOs if they try to piece out conservatism to pander to the muddled middle.
Conservatism is a stable three-legged stool; cut any one leg off and the stool is a two-legged rhino-turd walking.
Good people ought to be armed as they will, with wits and Guns and the Truth. God Bless Bitter Clingers, damn know-nothings, progressives.
Report this comment
chips1
Dec. 23, 2012 at 7:28pmI would describe it this way. You have a room with 3 doors. One door opens and the Hulk enters. (Republican). Another door opens and in walks King Kong.(Democrat). The 3rd door opens and in walks Miss America. (The people). At this point, we all know there is going to be a fight about who gets to do the screwing.
Report this comment
tifosa
Dec. 23, 2012 at 5:21pmSounds like bitter whine borne of sour grapes. He’s been running for POTUS AT LEAST since 2007:
“WASHINGTON, Jan. 3 — On his last full day as governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney created a presidential exploratory committee Wednesday, the first formal step in a likely run for the 2008 Republican nomination.”
Actually, it was probably the only reason he even went for a governorship. It was a Daddy thing and those always go waaaaaaay back.
Report this comment
sbenard
Dec. 23, 2012 at 5:17pmThe LAST person I want for President is the one that eagerly wants it. George Washington comes to mind. Anyone who lusts for power must be denied it if liberty is to survive!
Report this comment
Julinka
Dec. 23, 2012 at 5:31pmSuch a good point. Is there something wrong with running because you think you can help the country rather than coveting the office?
Report this comment
chicago76
Dec. 23, 2012 at 5:44pmYes there is something wrong today because he did not run to win. He ran because he felt entitled, just like Obama felt entitled.
Report this comment
Patriot Z
Dec. 23, 2012 at 5:13pmassuming this were true. gee thanks. THEN WHY THE HELL DID YOU RUN!? you ran cuz yer wafe wanted it?are you gonns sit there tagg ad tell me we are headed for serious trouble and enter into statism, all because your daddy couldnt just buy his wife flowers? is this really how you want it portrayed? did you really think that statement was a good idea to let out?
Report this comment
PIGSWILLNEVERFLY
Dec. 23, 2012 at 4:59pm1.The same elite consultant groups run both R’s and D’s campaigns.
2.R’s picked Rience Preibus over for RNC over Michael Steele – Steele was great in 2010. Preibus sucks!
3. The voting public had NO knowledge of the Consent Decree signed by the RNC from a former lawsuit the DNC won. There is NO way R’s will ever win Presidency with this decree, ever. It’s all rigged now.
4. The best Conservative candidate Michelle Bachmann and the best debater Newt Gingrich were not taken seriously and either would have been better and both Wanted to Win!
On November 5 Josh Romney came to Plymouth, MN and held a small rally and brought his 2 oldest of 5 children, Grace and Wyatt. During his short speech in a small, crowded garage type building with people circled around him he said “four of the sons did NOT want his father to be President or enter the race.” I was stunned.
All that wasted energy and money for someone that did not even want it. We have been duped!
I will never vote R=Progressive and certainly not D=Communist or Green=eco-freaks or Liberal-to close to anarchy.
The only party that will succeed, if possible, will be the Constitution Party if enough people realize that “it” is the only thing that matters with a person that has Constitutional values and principles.
I will not be duped again, if there is an again.
Report this comment
HappyConservative
Dec. 23, 2012 at 5:08pmWell this explains a lot and now it makes sense why Romney did so poorly in the final debate where he could have/should have taken barry apart on foreign policy and failed miserably to do so. How on earth does the GOP end up with a nominee who doesn’t even want the job?
Report this comment
As I See It
Dec. 23, 2012 at 5:23pmNeither did George Washington
Report this comment
johnpaulkuchtajr
Dec. 23, 2012 at 5:27pmI wondered why Romney “shut-down” for the third debate.
He seemed energized about Benghazi in the second debate; but, failed to answer the bell on Benghazi in the final debate.
I wondered if perhaps Romney had been briefed on some topic that put the fear of God into the deeply religious Romney. Something that he had no control over but something that would cause chaos if he pursued that line during the final debate. It’s as if Romney was saying “Hell, it doesn’t matter what I do, this is going to be all f’ed-up soon anyway.”
Or, like his son says, maybe he just didn’t care whether he crossed the goal line or not.
“Remember Benghazi and ALL the Traitors!”
Report this comment
Chet Hempstead
Dec. 23, 2012 at 7:17pmMichelle Bachmann was not ready for her close up. She looked as crazy as Nora Desmond, and revealed a lack of critical thinking skills when she repeated as fact some insane nonsense about vaccinations causing retardation that some kook babbled to her at a campaign event. Newt Gingrich sounded good until he started talking about his plans to colonize the moon. If you want to run a more conservative candidate for President, you need to be able to demonstrate to the mainstream voters that there is such a thing as one who is not stupid or crazy.
Report this comment
Julinka
Dec. 23, 2012 at 4:52pmBoth candidates made mistakes in the campaign. But whose were more glaring and more serious? Mr. O’s of course. The media didn’t cover any of HIS mistakes, instead they covered up for him. Add to that illegal immigrants voting, machines registering Obama when people voted Romney, and food stamp/welfare recipients who surely didn’t want America to be put back to work because it would mean THEY would have to work. I doubt any conservative will win high office again unless he panders to the masses and then he wouldn’t be a true conservative. This nation is in serious trouble because of the takers. It’s now OK to expect the wealthy to support people who want to sit at home and do nothing but feed off of the hard work of others. How does THAT work? Romney’s vision of putting America back to work only resonates with people who want to work.
Report this comment
drs1969
Dec. 23, 2012 at 9:16pmI repeat, the Federal Reserve won the election for BHO. If it was not buying up the Trillion dollar deficit, the deadbeats would not have had the money or time to make multiple trips to the polls.
Report this comment
Polarized America
Dec. 23, 2012 at 4:20pm.
awwww….. sore loser baby.. i didn’t win but i didn’t want it anyway so there
what are going to do next Mitt, stick out your tongue… and to think i voted for you
Report this comment
Keatonc33
Dec. 23, 2012 at 4:18pmI kind of feel for the guy. I mean he was a good governor. but he had to sell out just about everything he stood for, healthcare, pro choice, etc etc. to appease the tea party. so he was running on principles that weren’t even his own. I’d be incredibly disenfranchised too. That being said. a man who can sell out his beliefs so easily and flip flop on any issue that would get him additional support, would not make a good president or leader!
Report this comment
3Tesla
Dec. 23, 2012 at 4:16pmRomney would have been well on the way to turning this mess along by now, but with that said– no more appeasing the left who hate conservatives no matter what. We need a combo of Ron Paul and Marco Rubio. Forget the blacks and the gays and the feminists and the unions they are — and forever will be leftists. Rubio makes sense from a location stand point alone– no one from the Northeast will ever win again as a Republican.
Report this comment
Keatonc33
Dec. 23, 2012 at 4:33pmYou can’t forget the blacks, gays, unions and women… you cant win without them!
Report this comment
Keatonc33
Dec. 23, 2012 at 4:35pmand ron paul. as much as you might like his politics. heck. as a liberal myself I actually like alot of what Ron Paul stands for…. but he could not win on a national stage.. you have to play the game to win in America
Report this comment
drs1969
Dec. 23, 2012 at 9:27pmThat’s why the crooked RNC ran a Mass. moderate. He was one of them. They will not willingly nominate someone from outside of their NE district. Santorum was the next closest, being from Penn. and having a big gov. voting record. This is also why they keep pushing Christie. This is the ‘constant’ of the RNC. McCain got the nod because he’s been in DC forever(a puppet). Bush went to Princeton, Bush’s daddy from the NE. Bush’s G. Daddy was a senator from the NE. Reagan had to pick Bush in 1980, then Bush’s son’s friend tried to kill him a few months later.
Report this comment
BlackCrow
Dec. 23, 2012 at 4:12pmThe RINO lost. It’s over, control the bleeding and let’s get more Tea Party people into the Congress in 2014.
Report this comment
OldSurfRat
Dec. 23, 2012 at 4:18pmAgree!!!!
Report this comment
Keatonc33
Dec. 23, 2012 at 4:18pmCongress is the highest position a tea party candidate can win.
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Dec. 23, 2012 at 4:47pmDittos to both of you. Mitt should have stayed at home and played long distance tiddly winks with McCain.
Report this comment
ModerationIsBest
Dec. 23, 2012 at 4:57pmYeah, people like Akin…and Mourdock.
The “jobs jobs jobs” tea partiers when running for office, and the “abortion abortion abortion” tea partiers when they actually get elected.
Report this comment
BODYBAG
Dec. 23, 2012 at 6:15pmMSNBC: People Against Gun Control Are Scared Of ‘Black And Brown People’ Rising Up To Get Them…
http://weaselzippers.us/2012/12/22/msnbc-people-against-gun-control-are-scared-of-black-and-brown-people-rising-up-to-get-them/
Report this comment
charles116
Dec. 24, 2012 at 12:10pmYou seem to be very confused. 90% of all TP candidate were thrown out.
The movement is dead.
Give my regards to Allen West.
Right Wing fanaticism has been soundly rejected,
Report this comment
crazyrightwingmom
Dec. 23, 2012 at 4:11pmHe did it because it was the right thing….obvious. Tell me WHO in the world would want to run against this lying bunch of thieves??
Report this comment
Keatonc33
Dec. 23, 2012 at 4:19pmapparently another liar… remember when he said “i want to be president” : )
Report this comment
ModerationIsBest
Dec. 23, 2012 at 4:44pmHahaha, you people are so delusional that it’s almost pathetic.
Report this comment
Stoic one
Dec. 23, 2012 at 4:10pmIf he did not want it, he should not have run. Romney should have backed the best in his opinion. sounds more like an excuse for losing to me….
Report this comment
Keatonc33
Dec. 23, 2012 at 4:21pmYa. agreed. but of all candidates Romney had the only realistic chance of winning.
Report this comment
trueamerican40
Dec. 23, 2012 at 4:09pmJohn and Mitt…losers. Step aside. That goes with the Pauls as well. Don’t need ya!
Report this comment
AmericanStrega
Dec. 23, 2012 at 4:08pmIf this is true all I have to say is, Thanks for screwing the American People and getting Obama re-elected.
Report this comment
Keatonc33
Dec. 23, 2012 at 4:15pmDont blame him.. Look at the pool of republican candidates for president. The guy who didn’t even want the job was by far the best choice!
Report this comment
Free_Thought
Dec. 23, 2012 at 5:01pmI would also like to thank him. Obama belongs in office with michelle. Mitt and queen ann would have damaged our reputation beyond repair.
Report this comment
chicago76
Dec. 23, 2012 at 5:52pmKeaton you really need to get your zombie ass to some other site. Zombies have nothing to add to a conversation. They have no brains. They just want to eat people. So find some dead heads you can communicate/communist with and leave the thinking people alone for now.
Report this comment
simpletony
Dec. 24, 2012 at 12:37pmHear hear. We are the losers. The dumbed-down, criminal, welfare, union, movie star and other elements of the country are to blame. You’ll see, especially since you’ll all be the first to fall over the edge. You have voted a muslim into office, you stupid SOBs
Report this comment
Keatonc333
Dec. 24, 2012 at 1:37pmChicago… who else would have stood a chance?
Report this comment
TSUNAMI_22
Dec. 23, 2012 at 4:06pmWell, then Romney got what he desired, didn’t he?
Report this comment
chicago76
Dec. 23, 2012 at 5:53pmThat is the one truth everyone can take out of this article.
Report this comment