
U.S. President Barack Obama arrives in the briefing room where he said he was ‘modestly optimistic’ while making a statement on fiscal cliff negotiations following a meeting with Congressional leaders at the White House December 28, 2012 in Washington, DC. (Photo: Getty Images)
(TheBlaze/AP) — As everyone’s attention is focused on the slew of taxes set to increase in 2013, President Barack Obama has quietly signed into law a five-year extension to the warrantless intercept program that monitors the overseas activity of suspected spies and terrorists.
The program would have expired at the end of 2012 without the president’s approval, but won final passage in the Senate on Friday before heading to the president’s desk over the weekend.
Known as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, the law allows the government to monitor overseas phone calls and emails without obtaining a court order for each intercept.
The law does not apply to Americans, but the administration has staunchly refused to reveal whether Americans were inadvertently spied upon, or whether they are using foreign intercepts as a “back door” to spy on American citizens.
CBS News elaborates:
The Senate majority rejected arguments from an unusual combination of Democratic liberals and ideological Republican conservatives, who sought to amend the bill to require the government to reveal statistics showing whether any Americans were swept up in the foreign intercepts. The attempt lost, with 52 votes against and 43 in favor.
The Obama administration’s intelligence community and leaders of the Senate’s intelligence committee said the information should be classified and opposed the disclosure, repeating that it is illegal to target Americans without an order from a special U.S. surveillance court.
The group seeking more disclosures also sought – unsuccessfully – a determination by the government of whether any intelligence agency attempted to use information gained from foreigners to search for information on Americans without a warrant, referred to as “back-door” searches. The prohibition against targeting Americans without a warrant protects Americans wherever they are, in the United States or somewhere else. [Emphasis added]
Sen. Ron Wyden, a Democrat, is one member of Congress seeking more transparency in an effort to, in his words, “strike a balance between security and liberty.”
“How many phone calls to and from Americans have been swept up in this authority?” he asked.
When Americans are targeted for surveillance, the government must get a warrant from a special 11-judge court of U.S. district judges appointed by the Supreme Court.
–
Related:



















































































































Comments (84)
FlagWavingPatriot
Dec. 30, 2012 at 8:31pmThe Bill of Rights is nothing more than buttwipe to many in Washington, Republican and Democrat.
Report this comment
michaelmoron
Dec. 30, 2012 at 8:48pmAs I said earlier, the BILL of RIGHTS was not for the PEOPLE.
It is regarding the people, but it was made for the TRUSTEES of the ESTATE.
It is their Employee rules and regulation handbook on how NOT handle a Beneficiary.
It tells them that the People’s right to bear arms shall not be infringed, etc.
They have NO authority over you, unless you damage another beneficiary’s person, property or have a breach of contract.
Even this ODUMBO is a Trustee and SERVANT to a Beneficiary.
NOTICE to CURIOUS GEORGE:
If I even obtain evidence that you (Trustee) violated the rules of the trust by violating my ( Executor, Beneficiary and Shareholder), 4th amendment right, I will sue the Executive Office of the President which is a PRIVATE COMPANY !!!
That is only for starters.
I will come after you personally (Subpeonia and lawsuit) for breach of TRUST !!!!!
You are a Constitutional Scholar, ODUMBO. I think you know what that means !!!!!
All Rights Reserved, Under Constitutional Common law – without prejudice. U.C.C. 1-207/1-308
Report this comment
Gold Coin & Economic News
Dec. 30, 2012 at 8:49pmObama can seemingly do whatever he wants. He can implement things the criticized Bush for, he can undermine the Constitution, he can lie he a*s off on Meet The Press and have David Gregory kiss his a** and he just gets away with whatever he wants. This is no longer a country by, for and of the people:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGWeEo7wb9Q
Report this comment
flyoverbob
Dec. 30, 2012 at 9:29pmWe need this comrade,to protect the minions
Report this comment
banjarmon
Dec. 30, 2012 at 9:35pmIs any one checking BHO’s e-mail???
Report this comment
rickc34
Dec. 30, 2012 at 11:15pmThe past 4 years of telling lies have had their toll on Obama, he looks as if he has aged 20 years. The added stress of lies does damage to ones health.
Report this comment
Brother Winston Smith
Dec. 31, 2012 at 11:16amYup. This is a PERFECT example of leftist REPUBLICAN media LYING THROUGH THEIR TEETH.
LIE 1. They FALSELY insinuate that “Obama” did something ALONE, by putting his name in the headline and face in the story image. It’s not even worth checking, as we all know the answer, but I’ll wager most “tea party” republicans (FAKE-TEA) HELPED SEND IT TO OBAMA’S DESK IN THE FIRST PLACE!
LIE 2. They FALSELY insinuate that things like “warrantless wiretaps” are important issues to “report” on… WHILE COVERING UP THE FACT THAT REPUBLICANS ARE FULL-ON SUPPORTERS OF THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL police/surveillance-state. Warrantless wiretapping didn’t seem to be an “issue” when wiretapping Santorum, wiretapping Bachmann and wiretappping Romney were campaigning.
Report this comment
turkey13
Dec. 31, 2012 at 3:44pmBack in 2007 Obama brought this up while blaming everything on Bush & the Republicans. He continued it and now the Dems are finding out how handy this device is when you call NSA and track all your opponents phone calls. This is why all the Congressmen have prepaid phones for their staff & themselves andthose they want to talk to on the side.
Report this comment
TRILO
Dec. 30, 2012 at 8:26pmAnd those freedom loving constitutional republicans voted to support it. Imagine that. With friends like that who needs democrats?
Report this comment
Metalstr8jckt
Dec. 30, 2012 at 9:20pmMy pointing out the evident unmasking of the usurper of the Republic of the United States of America, is merely academic now. The Public is asleep to the tyranny it is enslaved by.
His only remaining problem is how to disarm the people who remain a threat against his hegemony of total control.
Congress has a broken will, and no intestinal fortitude anymore.
Prohibition of all future gun purchases, and government incentives for “good citizens” to turn in weapons will be key, to his goal.
The “Dream act,” as well as: “Aztlan”( Mexican “Reconquista” (Taking) of America by Communist subversives declaring Hispanic activism as Latino rights to citizenship by force will succeed to distract the country as incremental executive orders are signed into law.
All the while, illegal separation of powers edicts from the White house will continue to debase and disenfranchise those who oppose higher taxation, and a voice in government. The irony is that his subordinates in his “White Kremlin” will continue to claim that those in opposition to all his policies, are the ones intolerant to “Forward progressiveness.”
Telling the lies repeatedly of injustice, is the implementation of Communism to use a free society against itself.
The people merely have to be occupied with a few entertaining diversions and scraps to keep them from really assessing how much of their freedom they no longer possess.
Daily stress of life and paying for the “Seasons”
Report this comment
scrapadapolis
Dec. 30, 2012 at 8:07pmIm NOT going to read any comments.Remember you sticktards didnt want Romney in office because he voted for the very law you people are now upset about.You people are not OATHKEEPERS YOUR ALL TROLLS…
Report this comment
michaelmoron
Dec. 30, 2012 at 8:27pmRomney $ucked !!!
Report this comment
Toltepeceno
Dec. 30, 2012 at 10:12pmRomney Sucks, but not voting for him helped put omoron back in. I hope you fool’s think about that while omoron is disarming everyone like a good nazi leader.
Report this comment
dissentnow
Dec. 31, 2012 at 8:08am@Tolt
Governor Romney supported gun bans. How do you know that, in the wake of Sandy Hook, President Romney would not have supported those same gun bans?
Report this comment
cmr396
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:56pmI’m not sure if this is a bad thing or good thing. I mean im all for keeping our country safe,
and if that means spying on other countries with our great technology, then so be it!
but what worries me is, this is the gov getting their foot into the door for warrentless search and seizure.
Its a perfect nanny state scenerio.
just like gun restrictions, first its just a restriction, then another, and before you know it, it becomes a gun ban!
Report this comment
afishfarted
Dec. 30, 2012 at 8:00pmThe msm was outraged for weeks when Bush fisrt signed this law under the patriot act. Where are they now?
Report this comment
Uechi
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:55pmGood job you continued the violatioms of the 4th Amendment. Hpe your proud you piece of garbage
Report this comment
GhostOfJefferson
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:49pmCue Leftist outrage in 5…4…3…
Oh, wait, what? No outrage scheduled? But that last time….? What? Oh, it’s their guy doing it…I see…my bad.
Report this comment
Bodacious_Boedi
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:43pmNO!!!! He does this all the time…..oily, sneaky, corrupt son of a b*tch!!! All we can hope for is that the Federal Bench continues to have judges that will strike this type of thing down. This is crap..”doesn’t apply to Americans”…..horsesh*t!!!
Absolute power…etc……we already have drones over American soil!!
The Patriot Act, Homeless Security and the NDAA are travesties that need to be lanced like boils and done away with.
Report this comment
Victoriaautmors
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:41pmhttp://thehomegunsmith.com/pdf/9mmPistol.pdf Shh…. They may be listeniing.
Report this comment
michaelmoron
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:39pmHe is a Horrible Public Servant and TRUSTEE !!!!!!
That is Right !!!!!!
The Government is a Trust, and the Constitution and Bill of Rights is for the TRUSTEES to follow.
WE the PEOPLE are the Grantors and Executors of this TRUST.
ALL Public Officers and employees of the Gov’t are TRUSTEES.
WE the PEOPLE are the Beneficiaries !!!!
By Law, A trustee has NO AUTHORITY over a GRANTOR or BENEFICIARY.
They only have authority over the trust.
The Constitution and Bill of Rights are the TRUSTEES “Employees handbook” of rules and regulations for THEM.
It tells THEM that our rights are unalienable and not to be infringed !!!!
http://www.dailypaul.com/227306/bombshell-constitution-is-a-trust-the-people-are-the-beneficiaries-public-servants-are-trustees
Here is my “law Professor”. I first heard this from him
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLyhQqRJ7Oc
If you think this is a “theory”, check this:
“Government is a trust, and the officers of the government are trustees. And both the trust and the trustees are created for the benefit of the people.”
- Henry Clay
Henry Clay, Sr. (April 12, 1777 – June 29, 1852), was a lawyer, politician and skilled orator who represented Kentucky in both the Senate and in the House of Representatives. He served three different terms as Speaker of the United States House of Representatives and was also Secretary of State from 1825 to 1829. He lost his campaigns for president in 1824, 1832 and 1844.
Report this comment
michaelmoron
Dec. 30, 2012 at 8:02pmThe Trustees have Authority over the trust, but are NOT supposed to make rules (laws) regarding the
Beneficiairies. They can govern themselves and the trust and modify the trust as long as they don’t infringe on the Beneficiairies INHERENT RIGHTS. The GRANTORS (WE the PEOPLE) can also fire
the Trustees AT ANY GIVEN TIME !!!!!
They can NOT make the RULES of the TRUST, only GRANTORS can. But we elected them to represent us, and they most certainly DID NOT !!!
And now they have a 9% approval rating.
These lowlifes created a Corporation in 1871 and trademarked names including ‘United States’.
They have been operating the Government from the Corp. ever since.
That is not all bad news. That means we are Shareholders and still beneficiaries and they are still Employees and Trustees.
Shareholders can have meetings to fire Board Directors.
I SAY IT IS TIME FOR THE MILLION-MAN SHAREHOLDER’S MEETING in WASHINGTON D.C. !!!!!
Report this comment
wntsmallgov
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:32pmThe Czar has spoken
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:36pmIndeed.
Report this comment
E.Souchak
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:39pmIt’s not just Obama, its Washington DC and beyond.
Nadhmi Auchi further outed by John Shaw thanks to Doug Ross
http://illinoispaytoplay.com/2012/12/30/nadhmi-auchi-further-outed-by-john-shaw-thanks-to-doug-ross/
Report this comment
michaelmoron
Dec. 30, 2012 at 8:33pmThe Czar ???
BY LAW, He is an indentured Public SERVANT and TRUSTEE !!!!
BY LAW, I am an executor and Beneficiary of this estate (or Corp) called the ‘United States’.
BY LAW, a Trustee can NOT administrate authority over a Beneficiary.
BY LAW, a Trustee says “How high?”, when an Executor of the Estate says “JUMP”.
It is time to undo the Brainwashing they did to ALL OF US !!!!!
Report this comment
breiten
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:30pmThe next time any police or any govt police/military says for you to turn off your recording device: video/tape recorder, tell them,” I have a 1st Amendment right. You are doing this Illegally to Americans- a violation of the 4th amendment. ”
If they threaten, intimidate, and/or continue to force, then you know he is a traitor. Americans up hold the Constitution, not reject it and surely they don’t force others to reject it.
video tape – it is for your protection and to warning to others as proof. Tyrants don’t like being recorded. Look at Iran, Syria during the govt against it’s people. The same goes for Americans. Tyrants don’t want to be exposed.
Report this comment
Satellite309
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:28pm**********CALL TO ACTION**********
Blaze members! This is a call for action!
On Thursday, the House will vote on the position of Speaker of the House.
A fellow blaze member, STOPPRINTN, has suggested that we try to install Colonel Allen West for this position, thus removing John Boehner. I believe this to be an excellent idea. We need someone like Colonel West in there now. This is, I believe, a national EMERGENCY.
We only have three days left.
The House will vote this Thursday.
Please e-mail your reps in Washington and ask them to vote in ALLEN WEST FOR SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LINK TO HOUSE WEBSITE:
http://www.house.gov/representatives/find/
Allen West wikipedia LINK:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allen_West_(politician)
Report this comment
MLeo
Dec. 30, 2012 at 9:27pmColonel West
I love this man. HE should be President. At least he loves the United States.
Report this comment
666Sucks
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:28pmBREAKING NEWS – HAWAII STATE REGISTRAR CERTIFY’S OBAMA’S BC A FAKE!
http://theobamahustle.wordpress.com/2012/12/29/breaking-news-hawaii-state-registrar-alvin-onaka-has-publicly-certified-to-az-sos-ken-bennett-that-barack-obamas-hi-birth-certificate-is-legally-non-valid-and-the-white-house-image-is-a-for/
Report this comment
Bobby D
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:26pmThe POTUS and his 537 minions have sewn the wind. Soon, they shall reap the whirlwind.
Report this comment
dublinthewagons
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:18pmNow we know what he meant. TRANSPARENCY
What’s good for the goose does not apply to the gander
Report this comment
CatB
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:30pmNO President (or anyone else) should be able to expand something like this beyond their own term … and I DO NOT mean a third term Bummer.
Report this comment
VanceUppercut
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:40pmWhile I am no fan of warrantless wiretaps and other extreme Constitutionally questionable measures put in place to “fight terrorism”, I would like to point out that when Dubya was doing it and calling it the Patriot Act, I couldn’t find many Conservatives who had a problem with it. Now suddenly the do. We call that hypocrisy.
Report this comment
breiten
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:50pmTransparency is the Pres. knowing everything, and you nothing.
Under privacy laws, the govt can wiretape you too. It just passes a law to make it self look legitimate and law abiding so that they can say “they are following the law.” BS
Make a law so they can break the Constitutional law, that is want they do best. All because they are “protecting you”, and most Americans believe the govt is wanting to protect you, while at the same time coming after you.
Report this comment
GhostOfJefferson
Dec. 30, 2012 at 9:29pmWell Vance, ol’ buddy ol’ pal, you see, a lot of us are actually libertarians. I was against Bush doing this bull-spit and I’m against Obama doing it. You seem to suffer from a case of Argumentum Tu Quoque, which is, as you probably are not aware, a logical fallacy and an offshoot of Argumentum Ad Hominem.
Now, are you against this being done by Obama, or aren’t you? It’s a simple one word answer. Answer it, don’t deflect. Are you brave enough to do that?
Report this comment
VanceUppercut
Dec. 30, 2012 at 10:29pm@GhostOfJefferson
Apparently you suffer from a common condition called Commentum No Readum, which rendered you incapabke of reading this: “While I am no fan of warrantless wiretaps and other extreme Constitutionally questionable measures put in place to “fight terrorism””.
Report this comment
GhostOfJefferson
Dec. 31, 2012 at 5:39amVance, ol’ buddy ol’ pal, you didn’t answer the question. You also have terrible writing skills, but that’s another topic.
One can be “no fan” of anything, but still allow that a politician or law can do those things. For example, some people aren’t fans of pat down searches, but “grudgingly” allow that the TSA should be doing them. See what you did there?
So, out with it. Are you for Obama doing this, or not? I want to hear you state specifically that you are against Obama on this issue. I don’t care what you are or are not a fan of, and ten cent rhetorical tricks don’t work on me. So answer the question. Do you agree with Obama signing this renewal, or not? Can you do it?
Report this comment
LeadNotFollow
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:16pmThe media should have done their job and exposed this out of control, radical, anti-American, racist, in early 2008, before he ever became President.
The media is very much to blame for the mess America is in.
Report this comment
salvawhoray
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:31pmcan’t they be sued in some sort of way?
Time are different today; we can find all kinds of evidence on how they lie, and deceive the people.
If they are not going to be the people’s watch dog against the GOV. then whats the point of having them.
The Repubs need to speak out more about it, make some commercials or something.
Find a Dem. that may have decided to change to repubs and teach them some tricks.
I only wish the uni-bomber was out free, but instead of hating technology he hated the news media.
Report this comment
revelation2012
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:10pmslithers between his ‘steps’
Report this comment
LeadNotFollow
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:23pmThe media has never asked Obama to explain the serpent ring he’s worn since college.
http://tinyurl.com/byzjl6n
http://tinyurl.com/aojd8yo
Report this comment
P4cooler
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:03pmObama took 236 years of our American debt and DOUBLED it through his corruption. The United States is bankrupt and the Federal Reserve and banker giants (along with the media) are desperate to put America in a war just to “save” the US Dollar. Desperate governments do desperate things. Surveillance out of control. Asset taxes may be coming soon. Ex cars in Europe have to pay a yearly tax if the vehicle is over 250 HP. Democrats are discussing same. Americans are wise to all this Obama tyranny!
Report this comment
dissentnow
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:02pmWhere are all of the liberals that said that Bush should have been impeached for domestic spy programs? Oh, that’s right. Liberals only support civil liberties when a republican is in office.
Also, why are you neocons so offended by this when you all supported the patriot act when Bush was in office.
The river of hypocrisy flows in both directions.
Report this comment
dublinthewagons
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:20pmFare trial for terrorist. But not for U.S. citizens
Report this comment
Chromo200
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:23pmWe complained about Bush too .. look at his popularity it tanked. I don’t call overseas, but this will get expanded to us in the US.
I learned sometime ago, don’t write down anything that you don’t want people to read, now or in the future. Never say anything on the phone that people can use to embarrass you or use against you.
Report this comment
wntsmallgov
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:34pmI did not support the Patriot Act.
Report this comment
progressiveslayer
Dec. 30, 2012 at 6:59pmThe so called constitutional expert renews an unconstitutional law,the collectivist in him compels him to do it.
Report this comment
thindime
Dec. 30, 2012 at 6:54pmHow do you suppose the nailed General Petreus. Boy, was he set up from the start. How many other individuals, businesses, and organizations have been knuckled down by this administrations? When is someone going to start keeping track and legally challenge (consistently) an overreaching Federal government?
Report this comment
chips1
Dec. 30, 2012 at 6:50pmCheck out Obama’s blackberry. One big sting operation should do it.
Report this comment
dublinthewagons
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:23pmAfter all this does apply to foreigners
Report this comment
DougHuffman
Dec. 30, 2012 at 6:50pmQuietly yes. Keep your friends and loved ones close and your enemies – Obama’s FedGov is ENEMY – closer.
Read Electronic Privacy Information Center – EPIC.org
Read Zittrain’s The Future of the Internet — And How to Stop It.
http://futureoftheinternet.org/static/ZittrainTheFutureoftheInternet.pdf
μολων λαβέ molṑn labé ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE “From my cold, dead hands” works for me.
Report this comment
Jenny Lind
Dec. 30, 2012 at 6:45pmReal quick, raise your hand if you are shocked, horrified and amazed at these villians!
Report this comment
gyro
Dec. 30, 2012 at 6:52pmMe Me ** hands up**
Report this comment
chips1
Dec. 30, 2012 at 6:54pmI can only manage one finger.
Report this comment
DadRocked
Dec. 30, 2012 at 7:08pmChips1 – One time I saw my great grandmother give someone the finger with her pinky…
“Grandma, what does that mean?”
“That’s for those that don’t deserve the very best.”
That was at ten years old… At the time I didn’t understand but never forgot…
Report this comment
Jack Zedee
Dec. 30, 2012 at 6:41pmYAY the forces of evil triumph again
Report this comment
SaturdaysWarrior76
Dec. 30, 2012 at 8:48pmThe forces of PURE Evil.
Report this comment