‘Unconstitutional Laws Aren’t Laws’: Marine Who Penned Blistering Letter to Sen. Feinstein Over Gun Control Speaks Out
CNN
Cpl. Joshua Boston, the U.S. Marine whose scathing open letter to Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) over proposed new gun control legislation went viral, again vowed not to abide by any new law requiring him to register his firearms.
“Whatever happens happens. I have a right granted to me by the Second Amendment in our bill of rights and it says ‘shall not be infringed,’” Boston said Saturday on CNN. “Unconstitutional laws aren’t laws.”
Boston’s letter, titled “No ma’am,” was first posted on CNN’s iReport on Dec. 27 and quickly made the rounds on social media.
“I am not your subject. I am the man who keeps you free. I am not your servant. I am the person whom you serve. I am not your peasant. I am the flesh and blood of America,” the eight-year Marine Corps veteran wrote.
Boston said he wrote it after seeing all of the “misinformation” and “fear-mongering” coming out of the gun control discussion in the wake of last month’s mass elementary school shooting in Newtown, Conn.
He said that with many gun control laws on the books already, new legislation will do nothing to deter criminals.
“There’s over 2,000 gun laws as it is and the fact of the matter is predators are amongst us and we have to recognize that fact. We don’t live in a utopia. Our citizens have to be armed to protect themselves from these mad men,” Boston said. “People will choose whether or not to carry if they want to. I’ve made that choice as have hundreds of thousands of other Americans should we unfortunately ever find ourselves in a situation to protect others in our lives we will.”
Feinstein’s office said in a statement she “respects Cpl. Boston’s service.”
“She has heard from thousands of people — including many gun owners — who support her plan to stop the sale, transfer, importation and manufacturing of assault weapons and large capacity magazines, strips and drums that hold more than 10 rounds,” the statement said. “As Senator Feinstein has said, the legislation will be carefully focused to protect the rights of existing gun owners by exempting hundreds of weapons used for hunting and sporting purposes.”
Watch below, via Mediaite:
Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.
Popular Stories
‘The Daily Show’ Creator Makes Outrageously Offensive Anti-Conservative Joke About Okla. Tornado 470 Comments
Washington Times Writer: Fox News Scandal Goes ‘Much Deeper,’ W.H. Sitting on Something Top Obama Aides ‘Terrified’ About 443 Comments
Why Were DHS Agents Seemingly Monitoring Multiple Tea Party IRS Protests Across the Country on Tuesday? 362 Comments
University Will Investigate Christian Professor’s Intelligent Design Class Following Atheist Furor 329 Comments
CNN’s Wolf Blitzer Has Awkward Moment With Okla. Tornado Survivor After Asking If She ‘Thanked the Lord’ 269 Comments
Faith
-
Comedian’s New Anti-Muhammad Video Excoriates Islamic Prophet, Juxtaposes Him with Jesus: ‘Very Wrong and Twisted’
Read More
-
Teacher Admits She ‘Prayed Out Loud’ During Violent Tornado: ‘I Did the Teacher Thing that We’re Probably Not Supposed to Do’
Read More
-
Farrakhan Talks of ‘Satanic Jews’ and ‘Synagogue of Satan’ at Detroit Church Speech — but Wait Until You Hear Who Was in Attendance
181 Comments
-
Biden Praises Jewish Leaders for Helping Change Americans’ Views on Gay Marriage
Read More
-
‘Death! You F**k!’: Bat Mitzvah Chaperone Unleashes Explosive, Profanity-Laced Tirade Against Kids Over Candy-Throwing Incident
Read More
Business
-
Report: No IRS Workers Have Been Disciplined & Union Says It Hasn’t Been Contacted on Personnel
Read More
-
Ex-Cincinnati IRS Manager: This Was Not the Work of ‘Low-Level’ Employees
Read More
-
China Sets off What Could Be the World’s Longest Demolition
Read More
-
Here are the 5 Most Interesting Moments from Tuesday’s Hearing on the IRS Scandal
142 Comments
-
Jay Carney Shifts IRS Timeline (Again!)
106 Comments
Technology
-
The Incredible Role Facebook Played in the Aftermath of Devastating Okla. Tornado
Read More
-
Tech Company Demonstrates Remote Disabling of a ‘Smart Gun’
102 Comments
-
Meet the Blind Man Nicknamed ‘Midnight Gunslinger’ Who Has 80% Shot Accuracy
Read More
-
How a $4.5 Million Network of 181 Sirens Helped Save Lives in Oklahoma Twister
Read More
-
See the Record-Setting Python a Man Caught With His Bare Hands (and Guess How Much It Weighed)
Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (761)
wastley
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:31pm“Know, then, that now, precisely now, these people are more certain than ever before that they are completely free, and at the same time they themselves have brought us their freedom and obediently laid it at our feet. It is our doing, but is it what you wanted? This sort of freedom?’
Again I don’t understand’, Alyosha interrupted, ‘Is he being ironic? Is he laughing?’
Not in the least. He precisely lays it to his and his colleagues’ credit that they have finally overcome freedom, and have done so in order to make people happy.”
― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, The Brothers Karamazov
Report this comment
Trigus
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:47pmThe young corporal: “People will choose whether or not to carry if they want to. I’ve made that choice as have hundreds of thousands of other Americans should we unfortunately ever find ourselves in a situation to protect others in our lives we will.” It is millions my brother. We as a people have the largest armed standing Militia in the world.
“Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man gainst his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American…[T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.”
Tenche Coxe, The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788.
“We must all hang together, or, assuredly, we shall all hang separately.” Benjamin Franklin at the signing of the Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776
Report this comment
RedHarley
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:57pmHere’s the deal. I am a gun owner who will support her plan, as long as it contains one thing……
It must contain a retroactive provision (going back 4 years) that makes it an act of treason to have had anything to do with supplying “assault weapons” or “weapons of war” to Mexican drug cartels, Libyan opposition, Syrian opposition or anyone connected with Al Qaeda or the Muslim Brotherhood. Anyone found to have had ANY knowledge of these activities would be immediately imprisoned without bail and will be tried for treason.
The_Jerk
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:57pmDianne Feinstein is Jewish. She doesn’t give a hoot about a Constitution. They live by the Jewish written Manifesto, and are hellbent on making everybody else do the same.
Mil-Dot
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 5:09pmA patriot with the capability needs to publish a list of the names of all politicians, all of their family members, where they live and the GPS coordinates of their homes and properties. Every patriot should inform him or herself of the location of these vermin. Let them know that we know where THEY live and reside just like they avail themselves of our locations. That includes all Federal ” law enforcement officers” (gag) as well. Fight fire with fire.
Report this comment
Unix
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 5:12pmIt is quite simple really, comply I will not. Molon Labe, good luck! BTW, get your affairs in order, kiss your children, and your spouse before leaving the house to come to mine!
Report this comment
Fecal_Matters
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 5:13pmhttp://www.davisshootingsports.com/d…he_Problem.pdf
Report this comment
BODYBAG
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 5:16pm@REDHARLEY
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:57pm
Here’s the deal. I am a gun owner who will support her plan, as long as it contains one thing……
It must contain a retroactive provision (going back 4 years) that makes it an act of treason to have had anything to do with supplying “assault weapons” or “weapons of war” to Mexican drug cartels, Libyan opposition, Syrian opposition or anyone connected with Al Qaeda or the Muslim Brotherhood. Anyone found to have had ANY knowledge of these activities would be immediately imprisoned without bail and will be tried for treason.
—————————————————
You’d need to perfect that a little bit here and there but I’ll go along ———–
“supplying and/or facilitating and/or coordinating the supply of” would be one such change.
The wording has to be air-tight. These weasels rig the law to work in their favor.
Gold Coin & Economic News
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 5:25pmHe is exactly right. Unconstitutional laws are not real laws. I’m thinking Obama and company may have more on their hands than they bargained for.
http://www.isthatbaloney.com/if-you-dont-think-they-want-your-guns-just-read-senator-dianne-feinsteins-proposed-legislation/
Report this comment
Nehemiah6.3
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 5:40pmHunting and Sporting is not the reason given for the protection of the right to bear arms. I would say it is the last reason, I have the right to bear arms, including the so called “assault” weapons. The second amendment has nothing to say as to which kind of arms. It just says it shall not be infringed, period! There is no way we can legislate enough laws to make people be a moral God fearing people. That is an individual choice. Those of us who choose to be good citizens have the right to protect ourselves against those who do not choose to be good. And the right to choose to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government.
Report this comment
pakaeboiboi
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 7:04pmPresident Obama …. SLAVES DON’T NEED GUNS ….. Disarm your SLAVES NOW before it’s too late …..
Report this comment
Thevoice
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 7:16pmOf course “Guns” will have to go in the “New age progressive commie America”. The party leaders do want a armed cintizenery. We are past voteing this nonsense out. only way now is to demand it is nolonger funded and cut it’s money off. The only thing that rids us of this progressive commie nonsense today and for the furture is stop supplying it money..Its all about the almighty dollar. Cut their money off progressive nonsense dies off. I have been saying this for years. Now by the day it get more evendent.
Report this comment
TH30PH1LUS
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 7:39pmSen. Dianne Feinstein,
the 2nd Amendment has NOTHING to do with hunting. It has EVERYTHING to do with individual liberty and keeping the public in control of American government.
Report this comment
GodlessHeathen
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 8:07pm@ RedHarley – She can’t do that. What you’re proposing is known as an “ex post facto” law and is unconstitutional. You can’t retroactively punish anyone.
Report this comment
motherboard
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 8:26pm@ Thevoice: I will also have to go in any new age of liberal slavery upon all.
Report this comment
NOT A CRAZY
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 8:28pmThe Right to Keep and Bear Arms was put in place to protect the people from being mass murdered by any government. Essentially it is to keep the government(s) in their place. Without it we are nothing but lambs waiting to be slaughtered. Have you ever seen how the Muslim halal slaughter takes place? They cut the throats of living animals and the animals bleed to death while they struggle to live.
Report this comment
muffythetuffy
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 9:28pmWE NEED VETERANS LIKE HIM TO TRAIN US IN THE USE OF MODERN WEAPONS AND COMBAT TACTICS
We have the power to defend our nation against a renegade Washington regime but we lack the training.
Everyone is mobilizing but we are not yet an Army of One.
Secession is here and is no longer a dream.
Report this comment
banjarmon
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 9:45pmIs NOT the Constitution the Supreme Law of the land??
Dose the Constitution supersede All state laws??
If It dose, Is NOT every gun law written, that INFRINGES ON OUR RIGHTS TO OWN AND BEAR ARMS after the Constitution was written, UNCONSTITUTIONAL??
Report this comment
WarMunger_Al
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 10:45pmBanjarmon-
You are exactly right, every gun control law, at every level of government is illegal, unconstitutional. They all infringe on our guaranteed rights, but the sheep that are the American people have let them do it. Just like they allow government officers kick in doors to murder people suspected of involvement with drugs, or failure to pay taxes. The people have allowed their rights to be diminished by not using force to protect those rights.
Report this comment
DarkJello
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 11:39pmEncinom
Not sure why, but your ignorance never ceases to amaze.
Report this comment
SendTheMeteors
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 12:11amI think RedHarley is onto something when he says that, “Here’s the deal. I am a gun owner who will support her plan, as long as it contains one thing… It must contain a retroactive provision (going back 4 years) that makes it an act of treason to have had anything to do with supplying “assault weapons” or “weapons of war” to Mexican drug cartels.”
Now in the United States we don’t make retroactive laws and then punish people for a law that didn’t exist at the time. You’re wrong there, that’s not something we want for in this country for obvious reasons. However, to your point of making it illegal to sell weapons to Mexican Cartels or whomever else I agree with. That should be illegal.
Current law allows a person to walk up to anyone selling guns, at a gun show or gun shop, buy as many “weapons of war” as they can afford, and as much ammo as they want, then walk out into the parking lot and sells those guns at a nice profit to any buyer, be they Al Qaeda members, Mexican cartels or the certifiably insane. Gun sales of private individuals aren’t regulated, thanks to the NRA. So people with a clean background can buy all the guns they want and then sell them, legally, to whomever they want. No background check, no nothin’. I agree with you that that kind of activity should be regulated. All a terrorist or criminal organization needs is one patsy, and they’ve got all the guns and ammo they want. All legal. Thanks NRA!
Report this comment
WATER-THE-TREE
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 12:56amBANJARMON
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 9:45pm
Is NOT the Constitution the Supreme Law of the land??
Dose the Constitution supersede All state laws??
If It dose, Is NOT every gun law written, that INFRINGES ON OUR RIGHTS TO OWN AND BEAR ARMS after the Constitution was written, UNCONSTITUTIONAL??
AMEN!!! Our permit is the CONSTITUTION!! PERMITS, CONCEALMENT LAWS ARE ALL UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Is there a way to sue the government about this, I think that is what we need to do. Sue the states and Fed over all of these NON LAWS!!!
Report this comment
scarydave
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 12:57amI stand and salute Cpl. Joshua Boston, for his words of wisdom, logic, and most of all… Patriotism. We are going to need many more just like him. Soon. I think 2013 will be the year that people get smart and organize for any number of bad outcomes due to the policies of Obama’s Marxist administration and our idiot Reps in Congress. My suggestions… Join or start a local Militia. Do NOT allow our government to take away ANY of our 2nd Amendment rights, by any means necessary. Buy lot’s of ammo or better yet learn to make your own and buy a lot of the supplies you will need to do it with. Learn to Barter more. And finally… make this the year that you swear to leave the USA better for your offspring than what we were given by our parents. It is after-all an unwritten American rule and always has been, so it has become our patriotic duty!
However it will take a lot of people doing some extraordinary things in 2013 so we can start to take back the Country we all dearly love.
Also… We need a dynamic Leader to emerge before we can become a real movement (it’s just the way it is so don’t ask me why. It just is). Please know that some of us are NOT waiting for a Leader to magically appear. Instead we are presently actively looking for that leader. Pray for us.
Report this comment
valiant1776
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 1:09am@sendthemeteorstoliberalhomes Do you ever have anything remotely original to offer to any single freaking discussion? Every subject you bring yourself into you start with parroting everything the leftist MSM says. Can you process information independently, thoroughly, and, objectively analyze it?
It’s illegal to sell guns to Mexican cartels! What the hell are you on? Fast and Furious was an illegal act committed by the federal Government under Obama’s administration. But traitorous Obama and traitorous Holder exempted themselves from these laws already on the book. It’s illegal to sell any gun to any felon or any person to whom the seller knows or has suspicion to believe that crimes will be committed with those guns. Obama, Holder and the rest of the ATF agents should be brought to Justice. They’re not above the Law, they don’t write Laws, but are bound to uphold the Law. So shut your ignorant deluded leftist pie hole already.
No “weapons of war” can be sold by just anybody to anybody anywhere. Real “weapons of war” are machine guns or other fully automatic rifles. These are only sold by class three firearms licensed dealers. These are heavily regulated and taxed by the federal Government. There is a special application needed to purchase one, mandatory registration, rigorous background check, lots of money to hand over, and a long waiting period to receive it. You know nothing about guns or gun laws. You liberals are dumber than a rock.
Report this comment
sillyfreshness
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 1:25amDiane Feinstein=leftist, “chosen person” Juden controlling the Gentile masses.
Obama_Sham
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 1:44am“encinom
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 11:23pm
The paranoid gun nuts are out in force. Spewing their ignorance of the law and constitution. All the little boys talking big from around the compound campfire. The only thing they prove is that they lack the intelligence or the mental stability to own even a spud gun.
The marine is a fool. His rant was nothing more than a hissy fit of a child afraid his favorite toy is about to taken away. Unless he is in a well regulated State Militia he has no right to a gun.”
Speaking of ignorance and paranoia…
Report this comment
Obama_Sham
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 1:47amValliant… Don’t waste your time with JZS, I mean Sendthemeteors… Long time troll here that loves repeating the left talking points… He is as ignorant as Encinom…
Report this comment
MIBUGNU2
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 6:22am@pakaeboiboi
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 7:04pm
President Obama …. SLAVES DON’T NEED GUNS ….. Disarm your SLAVES NOW before it’s too late …..
That would be your 47% getting “Free Stuff”…..I work for MY STUFF, so i’m keeping mine !!
Report this comment
jcldwl
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 8:04amHere is one of the regimes weekend news releases. Read it closely it is setting up the excuse for executive ordering gun control.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-weighs-broad-gun-control-agenda-in-wake-of-newtown-shootings/2013/01/05/d281efe0-5682-11e2-bf3e-76c0a789346f_print.html
Report this comment
TennesseeMan
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 8:05amENCINOM said:
“The marine is a fool. His rant was nothing more than a hissy fit of a child afraid his favorite toy is about to taken away. Unless he is in a well regulated State Militia he has no right to a gun”
ENCINOM is an IDIOT! The ‘comma’ between the “militia” part and the “people” part means either “or” or “and thus “THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” is a SEPARATE right from the Militia! YOU ANTI-2ND AMENDMENT PEOPLE SHOULD ALL BE SHIPPED TO CUBA.
Report this comment
old white guy
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 8:15amall laws that prohibit, restrict or require registration of guns are unconstitutional.
Report this comment
poorrichard09
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 8:30amAlways remember: the politicos, media types, movie actors etc. that yell the loudest about disarming honest citizens all work in buildings with armed guards, have bodyguards/security, live in gated communities with controlled access-so THEY are safe. In the real world, people need to protect themselves.
Report this comment
SR1911man
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 8:56amShe is not looking to take away the rights of current gun owners…
Yes she is. She is stopping us from buying new guns in the future. She is also stomping on the rights of future gun owners. There is the “evil” in this plan.
Do you like how she comes to the aid of David Gregory (a snake) so quickly but is grilling and making a fool of a hero to our nation? What an idiot.
Report this comment
Soulfire1975
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 9:07amThey don’t’ care about our rights. When people figure this out the better we will be. Our gun rights isn’t for protection from intruders. but rather the government taking to much and growing out of control like it is now and THAT is why they want to take our guns. Seriously hunting weapons pretty much be left? She can bite me.
Report this comment
decendentof56
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 9:07amTENNESSEEMAN……..
You have to realize that trools here do not understand the 2nd amendment, and especially, the context in which it applies.
If people study the DOI, Articles-of Confed,Constitution, and other writings of the founders, they will know that the first sentence of the 2nd Amendment..”A well-regulated militia, in order to defend a free state”….. was referring to the INDIVIDUAL STATES.
There were more than a few who felt that creating a central, or”Federal” government, with ANY authority over the states, was a real danger. Therefore, a “militia” of each state would be necessary to defend state freedom against a tyrannical central government. The militia would be a “citizen-militia”, where-by they would have to be armed for immediate action.
The “shall not be infringed” part speaks to the first part. Those two sentences are inseparable.
This is the part which uninformed leftists here do not understand. Are they saying that the all-powerful gov’s of the Soviet’s, Chi-Com’s, Castro, and elsewhere did not suppress freedom? So, were those gov’s OK? Those “subject’s” were unarmed. How many were put to death?
I addressed you because trolls here are incapable of logical thought. Why do people waste their time trying to convince them?
Reference Yuri Bezmanov (KGB defector) video’s on YT to better understand the brainwashing technique. He explains that you could bathe the brainwashed in facts, and they would refuse to believe.
Report this comment
SLAPTHELEFT
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 9:35amThe law will be written carefully…..
Yeah, I’m sure it will. Like the insider trading law. Or obamacare. These aholes are unfit to be the leaders of a free people. Thanks a lot California. It is you moron who are responsible for these d-bags looting our freedoms. How much more of your freedoms will you give up before you achieve the liberal utopia you seek?
Report this comment
Armed Patriot
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 9:44amEncinom… Your ignorance is what abounds. The Second Amendment was written in two parts. Sorry they didnt number them for the ignorant such as yourself. I will. 1. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State. Under US Code, every US born citizen between the age of 17 and 45 is a member of the FEDERAL MILITIA. 2. The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Even the Supreme Court has acknowledged it is the right of WE THE PEOPLE as stated in the Second to keep and bear arms.
Your argument is moot, uninformed, and ignorant. Sorry that you dont feel so strongly about your God given rights but then again, you are Godless. Obama will provide, right. I bet your name would be more fitting as Welfarem. Am I right???
Encinom. I tell you what. You want to take away my firearms??? You be the one to come and take them. You stand in front. You will be treated no different than Homeland Security or ATF. Molen Labe.
Report this comment
John WIS.
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 10:05amREDHARLEY:
How could you say that you support her plan, whether your a gun owner or not, even with your demands?
Report this comment
Armed Patriot
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 10:07amencinom… You do realize that the Columbine Massacre happened during a Federal Assault Weapons Ban dont you??? What good did it do? You do realize that the Sandy Hook Elementary School Massacre happened in a state with an Assault Weapons Ban in place dont you??? What good did it do??? You do realize that the Virginia Tech Massacre was carried out using two pistols dont you??? What good would an Assault Weapons Ban do???
You do realize that last year more people were murdered with hammers than guns dont you??? You do realize that last year more people were murdered with clubs than guns dont you??? You do realize that more lives are saved by guns than taken by guns every year dont you???
Facts are a very hard thing for liberals to understand.
How do you piss off a conservative??? Lie to him.
How do you piss off a liberal??? Tell him the truth.
Report this comment
ginger100
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 10:26amWe are broke! We are trading in negative credits. They are just buying time for the very hard landing of reality. We are going to be going Greek with guns.
Report this comment
Bowlz
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 10:47amdon’t know who that woman is, but she laughed at a Marine at the end of the clip. Too many false people that want to make rules for everyone else and control things/people. the real people that made America would do fine without these over-educated idiots.
Report this comment
theKirt
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 10:47amENCINOM is a troll. His stated beliefs are obviously meant to incite.
Report this comment
danger08
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 11:25am@NEHEMIAH6.3 You said it correctly. The 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting. It was meant as a means to deter our new gov’t from becoming tyrannical as King George had become. Evil exists and those who mean to do harm will find a way. I have the right to protect my family, property and those that I care for from evil and oppression.
I feel there is something more sinister behind these plans. We hear daily about those in gov’t wanting to restrict rights and freedoms. They can spy on Americans with no warrant and detain them indefinitely. The NDAA states it can detain Americans who have been labeled as terrorists. If we don’t turn in our weapons could we be labeled as such? Warrantless wiretapping allows them to view our communications and listen to calls without supervision.
I hope I’m wrong but when you look at all of the information and who is running our federal gov’t I would err on the side of caution and have your ducks in a row.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 11:26amSendTheMeteors
Now in the United States we don’t make retroactive laws and then punish people for a law that didn’t exist at the time.
***
Sorry troll but President Clinton passed an illegal retroactive tax increase of 1993.
***
http://www.heritage.org/research/lecture/retroactive-tax-increases-and-the-constitution
In 1993 the Democrats had control of the Presidency (Bubba Clinton), the House (Speaker Foley) & the Senate (Senate Pres. pro tem: Robert “KKK” Bird). So they did what Democrats always do, illegal sh/t like retroactive laws.
***
RedHarley’sd deal is a Faustian deal. It is a quid pro quo (This for that) which the Democrats do not want to make. obama, Holder, Hillary don’t want to go to jail so they will never sign on.
We’d take it of course. Throw the Democrats in jail. When the crime rate is unaffected we would get rid of those gun restriction. But the poor Dems well they would be left to rot.
Poor troll relegated to midnight harassment like the in their cases famous “Night Witches” or Wash Machine Charlie”. Can’t stand toe to toe after all that education. LMAO ;)
Report this comment
TruthTalker
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 11:30amMolon labe
Report this comment
Advection
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 11:42am@MIL-DOT, public officials and their private armies have special privileges. Why would they even consider giving those privileges up?
Report this comment
sirock
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 11:46amTo the Jerk please lose that racist BS for one Feinstein is not a practicing Jew her religion is Progressivism just like obama.
Report this comment
Kregneva
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 11:49am1) Walkabout is pretending to be an American, and has stated he was “in country” and remains “aligned with spec ops.” On its citizenship and service, Walkabout never writes anything authentic. There are more than one Walkabout contributors, and they include misogynist as well as pro-female points of view based on the shift they work. They use a “cut & paste” method to dump supposed proof of their diatribe that rarely amounts to anything meaningful.
2) I empathize with the enduring sentiment, “Once a Marine, Always a Marine,” however the headlines on this story is misleading, as well as some of the text. This gentleman is a veteran but is now a Civilian, and as such he has many more rights than a uniformed service member on active duty, who would not be allowed to make these statements publicly. Technically, calling this gentleman a Marine, without saying ex-Marine, implies active duty status.
3) I am Spartacus.
Report this comment
psychokittis
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 12:32pm@the jerk.
Dianne Feinstein isn’t a lety because she’s Jewish. She’s a lefty because she’s delusional. Enough with the anti-semitism. It make you look idiotic. It is precisely sentiments like those you posted rthgat led to a minor German political party (German Worlers Party) to be trasnsformed into a major national cult which murdered millions( National Socialist German Worker’s Party-aka the NAZIS) Careful that you don’t turn into one of those scuzzbuckets.
Report this comment
RedHarley
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 12:40pmFor those who have commented on my “deal” to go along with the lunacy presented by Sen Feinstein
Sendthemeteors – you are a moron.
Yes, it IS a Faustian deal….a deal with the devil. The whole idea was to put forth the truth of the matter, and that is that Obama and his cronies have no problem supplying “assault weapons” to all of those mentioned (cartels-al qaeda, etc.) but want to keep them out of the hands of law abiding citizens.
I realize that you cannot make retroactive such a law (too bad in this case)
It was put forth only to point out the hypocrisy of those on the left.
Would I go along with Feinstein and Obama’s gun grab………..ever ?? Molon Labe
Report this comment
Joseph Dowell
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 1:09pm@The_Jerk:
“Dianne Feinstein is Jewish. She doesn’t give a hoot about a Constitution. They live by the Jewish written Manifesto, and are hellbent on making everybody else do the same.”
Though Feinstein may be Jewish PLEASE do not lump her with the rest of the freedom loving Jewish people in this world. The only truly “Jewish Manifesto” I know of is the BIBLE. and in the bible there is a verse that says it’s OK to kill an intruder in my house. (I.E. right to keep and bear arms)
I find your comments constantly racist and Anti-semetic by lumping “ALL” Jews together as evil people. FYI Hitler did the same, The leaders of the Islamist nations do the same, Stalin and other EVIL men did the same through out history did the same. Some were Jews themselves none followed the book of rules they proposed to follow. At this point you are no better then Feinstein, Boxer, DWS and the rest of the Left wing radical Nuts that you espouse to hate.
Report this comment
fordfan
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 1:22pm@GODLESSHEATHEN: @ RedHarley – She can’t do that. What you’re proposing is known as an “ex post facto” law and is unconstitutional. You can’t retroactively punish anyone.
What exactly is retroactive? Have I missed the trial and conviction or exoneration of those involved with Fast & Furious, the conflict in Libya and other such illegalities and unconstitutional BS? Nope. It appears to me these are still CURRENT issues…..not to mention law means NOTHING to some of these traitors like Frankenfeinstein and obama unless following them benefits THEM. Passing a law like REDHARLEY proposes would be merely symbolic.
Report this comment
JediKnight
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 1:29pm@Godlessheathen: Have you read Feinstein’s proposed legislation? She plans to make those of us that own guns already criminals by including a provision that would require us to resubmit to a background check and have our thumbprints stored. We’ve purchased guns (meaning passed a background check already) and she wants us to submit to a new one. That is ex post facto. Quite frankly, her plan is to turn millions of Americans into criminals overnight.
Report this comment
techengineer11
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 1:49pmIt appears that the Feinsteins, Liebermans, Schumer, Levin, Boxers, Barney Franks, Franken, Lautenbergs, Emmanuels, Wexlers, Adlers, Axlerods, and Wasserman Schultz of the world are just not going to relinquish until they get their national database or they get enough ignorant idiots to accompany them in going door to door confiscating law abiding American’s weapons.
Mr. Adler says that “as we get involved in these ad nauseam debates over the Second Amendment, our children are still at risk” and that “debating is not the action verb we need to protect our children.”
He says that this as it is widely reported in the past few days that more people have been murdered with hammers and bats the past 10 years than rifles. He and his anti-American, anti-Constitutional, anti-Liberty cohorts say this as a woman in Atlanta, GA just saved her entire family from armed robbery and perhaps murder this past week by putting about 6 caps in this pos thugs face.. They say all that knowing the history of our 2nd amendment and why it was put into our Constitution to begin with. .They all know it had nothing to do with bird, squirrel, or deer hunting or even sportsmanship and not even self-protection but to prevent Tyranny and tyrannical power hungry thugs from ever abusing the law abiding people of this nation.
techengineer11
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 1:51pmI’m just so sick of it all. Why come we can’t call it what is which is Treason by a Domestic enemy of the people of America. Seriously it’s time for the pretense to end. The history of these people is out there for all to see but you will not get it in our gov’t indoctrination centers or from one of their numerous Marxist Media networks..
As an aside it’s been a joy the past couple of days to watch them scream and shout over Al-Jazeera’s purchase of Al Gore’s little media network. They are so afraid that the American people are going to be exposed to some propaganda! That the American people are just too damn stupid to discern fact from fiction.. Well obviously they are correct because far too many of our fellow Americans fall for their Marxist, Liberty hating filthy ideology which they tout and promote daily.
Who knows maybe Al-Jazeera will question the wisdom in occupying two Arab countries on the other side of the globe for over 10 years at a cost of trillions and an immeasurable cost in blood for what??? Why? Why the occupation? I’d love to hear a serious debate because I’ve not heard one since we went into Afghanistan..
Remember first we were only going after Al-Qaeda and that the Taliban were ok.. (See the picture of the Taliban with Reagan which I posted the other day? He said they were like our Founding Fathers..) Now we are there to root out the Taliban because they don’t treat their women well..
Report this comment
techengineer11
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 1:52pmEnough is enough. The game of pretense the game of acting like we are not currently under this filthy vile occupation needs to come to an end and now! We need to be honest about the state we find ourselves in and honest about how we got here.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-weighs-broad-gun-control-agenda-in-wake-of-newtown-shootings/2013/01/05/d281efe0-5682-11e2-bf3e-76c0a789346f_print.html
Report this comment
SendTheMeteors
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 2:12pmRedHarley, you are correct, clause 3 of Article I, Section 9 of the United States Constitution specifically states that neither the Federal Government or State Governments can pass ex post facto laws. In other words, you can’t pass a law and retroactively apply that law to acts committed before the law took place.
“Would I go along with Feinstein and Obama’s gun grab………..ever ??” Actually Harley, the proposed legislation is not a “gun grab.” That kind of misinformed opinion sadly prevents any logical discussion of issues. Actually the law:
Protects legitimate hunters and the rights of existing gun owners by:
Grandfathering weapons legally possessed on the date of enactment;
Exempting over 900 specifically-named weapons used for hunting or sporting purposes; and
Exempting antique, manually-operated, and permanently disabled weapons.
http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/assault-weapons
If this or any other legislation actually was a “gun grab,” (which would be unConstitutional), then I’d be on your side.
Report this comment
Lgbpop
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 2:15pmLeave it to a stoner to quote a Russian about freedom, regarding Americans and their erstwhile public servants. I prefer to keep in mind the words of John Stark, a Revolutionary War general from the state of New Hampshire – “Live free, or die.”
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 3:38pmRed Harley, meteors would sell you down the river if she could.
” clause 3 of Article I, Section 9 of the United States Constitution specifically states that neither the Federal Government or State Governments can pass ex post facto laws. In other words, you can’t pass a law and retroactively apply that law to acts committed before the law took place.”
Except if those acts are financial transaction such as going to work & getting paid.
Clinton passed a retroactive tax increase. It was passed in March of 1993 7 yet it taxed income going back to January 1st of 1993.
http://www.heritage.org/research/lecture/retroactive-tax-increases-and-the-constitution
The new Feinstein bill is just a 1st step. She doesn’t over reach as much as the Clintons or Obama’s so she does thing in steps. She is not as delusional as the rest.
But she wants to get rid off all guns except for law enforcement and since she is a VIP she will always have their services.
“”If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them . . . Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ‘em all in, I would have done it. I could not do that. The votes weren’t here.” – Diane Feinstein (Duchess of California)
Meteors lies once again & Fails once a gain. ;)
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 3:40pmMeteors thought she saw some daylight & headed for it only to get pawned!
LMAO :)
*********
RedHarley
For those who have commented on my “deal” to go along with the lunacy presented by Sen Feinstein
Sendthemeteors – you are a moron.
Yes, it IS a Faustian deal….a deal with the devil.
Report this comment
girlnurse
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 3:56pmSomeone please sendthemeteors to fall on sendthemeteors…
Report this comment
upeopleneedtogetalife
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 4:05pmtechengineer11
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 1:49pm
It appears that the Feinsteins, Liebermans, Schumer, Levin, Boxers, Barney Franks, Franken, Lautenbergs, Emmanuels, Wexlers, Adlers, Axlerods, and Wasserman Schultz.
Are all those very outspoken liberals Jewish? That’s amazing. That’s like the ruling class of the Democrat Party.
Wonder why so many Jews are so liberal?
Maybe they just detest our American Constitution?
I can’t get over that list of names.
Report this comment
SendTheMeteors
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 4:51pmWalkabout, please read the relevant portion of the Constitution. Yes, the Supreme Court said Clinton’s tax increase was Constitutional, but you ought to stop pretending it has any applicability here. You’re suggesting that the government can pass and enforce ex post facto laws – say about gun control – and that’s false. Your’s is a pseudo-intellectual argument.
And don’t you feel a little odd about this compulsion of yours to respond with three or four posts to every one of mine? Your stalking is a little creepy.
Report this comment
Tom70
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 7:06pmTrigus we can only hope that some sanity will prevail and the regime and the Demicans(that is RINO”s and democrats) don’t ram gun control and forced confection down out throats like they did with Obamacare. These fools have been salivating over the death of these kids ever since it happened. I also believe they have been waiting for just this occasion to unload their agenda that has been sitting on a shelf for a long time.
I still can’t get the image of Obama theatrics, the almost tears, the look left, pause, look right, pause, purse the lips look into the camera slowly reading his lives. The man is an actor, “who struts and frets his petty piece upon the stage.” to bad it is the stage of our lives and the consequences are monumentally dangerous for a Nation that is in decline under his rule. Do or die he will fallow the agenda of the progressive left, with no qualms as to the fate of a Nation.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 8:30pmSend The Meatballs
I don’t care what SCOTUS said about the retroactive tax increases being constitutional;. Your original point was that laws are not retroactive. Well the tax rates made by a law certainly were.
How does a business or a payroll processing company process wages for 90 days or more & take out the proper amount in taxes if they don’t know what the rate maybe? IT is hard, but since you have never made payroll, you don’t give a flying f___.
Just because an group of people, SCOTUS, who are considered august does not mean that they reason logically each & every time. After all they upheld slavery.
P.S. go whine about how many times I post in response to your lies. If I want to post, multiple times, I will. You will only respond to 1 out every 30 rebuttals to your posts anyway. Considering that post are removed, posting multiple posts makes sense. Further if you make outlandish claims like Nancy Pelosi is being attacked because she is female & that has never happened to a Republican woman, well rubbing all the instances via multiple posts in your face is well karma. Additionally, post with links often get deleted by complaining trolls who can’t take the heat or by admin.
Me doth think you protest too much. Besides Monicne & Wango have not been posting very much & their crap is a little weaker than yours, but not by much. I have seen, when you are pressed, you resort to short snippy ad hominem attack posts. Such grace under fire. ;)
Report this comment
RedHarley
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 8:30pmMeteors-as previously stated, you are a moron.
Diane Feinstein has ALWAYS wanted to ban all guns in the hands of private citizens.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=blXkl9YVoHo
She has not changed….she started to write this new legislation a year before Newtown.
As far as your contention that her proposal ALLOWS for “legitimate hunters”, etc to keep their guns………..again, you show what a moron you really are. The 2nd amendment, as has been stated many timnes has absolutely nothing to do with hunting or sport. That is a straw dog dreramed up by the gun grabbers. Do a little reading about the history of the second amendment.
Do you not find it the least bit troubling that the loudest proponents of gun control are those who have themselves and their families SURROUNDED by firearms ? DO you not think that YOU and your family should at least be able to protect yourself as well as these two ?
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 8:37pm“But in 1918 and 1926, each of the Revenue Acts was applied to the ENTIRE CALENDAR YEAR that had preceded enactment.”
http://www.heritage.org/research/lecture/retroactive-tax-increases-and-the-constitution
So lets say you pay a 50% tax rate for a given year. You pay it & consider yourself free & clear. You retire & 1 year later, the government comes back & said that the taxable rate was 75%. Well you don’t have the money. So you miss the tax deadline. So the IRIS fines you & start assessing interest on the overdue amount & fines. Soon you are in the poor house, but a bridge troll like Meteors, says “well a group of 9 people judged it Constitutional, so what is the BFD!”
That is about the size of it. Robbery today, robbery tomorrow & robbery the next day.
A troll’s life is a happy one :)
Report this comment
Excomunicatedmarine
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 9:02pmRed Moped and Body Bag……….WTF ? You starting to sound like a progressive……you really think some nut case cares about what these fools write ?
Report this comment
techengineer11
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 9:06pmJoseph Dowell
@The_Jerk:
“Dianne Feinstein is Jewish. She doesn’t give a hoot about a Constitution. They live by the Jewish written Manifesto, and are hellbent on making everybody else do the same.”
Though Feinstein may be Jewish PLEASE do not lump her with the rest of the freedom loving Jewish people in this world. The only truly “Jewish Manifesto” I know of is the BIBLE.
Well let allow me to help you out Mr. Dowell. Maybe you are not familiar with the little Manifesto which Moses Levy Mordecai wrote back in the late 19th century. You may know him by Karl and his tribe took to it by the masses. As a matter of fact Winston Churchill penned an article in 1920 saying that little Manifesto and that little tribe were the ones behind the millions slaughtered in the former Soviet Union. Look it up.
Regardless that’s why I’m so concerned about the Feinsteins, Liebermans, Schumer, Levin, Boxers, Barney Franks, Franken, Lautenbergs, Emmanuels, Wexlers, Adlers, Axlerods, and Wasserman Schultz trying to create data bases of gun owners…etc Oh yeh, I left our dear Mayor Bloomberg a lover of Liberty in NYC.. lol
I don’t think they are too interested in your Bible.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 9:15pm“Walkabout, please read the relevant portion of the Constitution.” -Meteors
http://www.heritage.org/research/lecture/retroactive-tax-increases-and-the-constitution
Well if the “EX POST FACTO CLAUSE” only applies to criminal cases because SCOTUS says so, then we can make administrative & civil judgments on many things. We can say the tax deductibility of 401Ks are no longer in force this year or in the future. We can make it retroactive 1 year. If 1 year why not 10?
So if 401 Ks were no longer tax deductible for 10 years, how screwed would people be?
It can’t happen here? Well if you can make a tax rate retroactive a whole calendar year why not for 10. what is stopping them?
Not the the Supreme Court.
Meatballs cannot reason. All he can do is harmonize with TPTB.
Report this comment
Trigus
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 11:03pmLaws that forbid the carrying of arms… disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes… Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
Cesare Beccaria, On Crimes and Punishment, quoted by Thomas Jefferson in Commonplace Book, 1774-1776
Report this comment
Trigus
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 11:08pmNo people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and Virtue is preserved. On the Contrary, when People are universally ignorant, and debauched in their Manners, they will sink under their own weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders.
Samuel Adams, letter to James Warren, November 4, 1775
Report this comment
SendTheMeteors
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 11:24pmStalkabout, stay on topic. We’re talking about gun control here. Do have any opinion on the subject under discussion? Do seriously believe that the government is going to declare guns illegal, then come take them from you? Seriously dude, what’s your point? Do you have a way to tie in a 25 year old decision from the Supreme Court on taxes to the confiscation of guns from all Americans?
Stalk, please. Come to your point.
Report this comment
Kregneva
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 11:40amThe Walkabout Team is OWNED by SendTheMeteors 14 points to five. Walkabout lost ground by deliberate obfuscation and skirting the point, and lost more points by cutting and pasting unrelated materials, and in the end, by insisting the rules need to reflect it’s inadequate response, by attacking the competitor’s intelligence and “schedule” and by whining in general about the competition being so hard. The Walkabout Team’s multiple shifts displayed different writing styles, skills and contexts during a whirlwind 14 hours of posting on various topics. Some were quite embarrassing.
“Walkabout.” Australian Origins:
1- Aboriginal tendency or urge to depart without notice (and reappear just as suddenly) without notifying the employer.
2- Unaccountable Shiftlessness.
3- A Grifter, Gypsy, or Hobo.
4- A Bum on an extended Holiday with no visible means of support, esp., an unemployed Australian male.
5- A risky adventure in the Outback.
Meaning in USA: A poser, false flag pretender or fake citizen.
I am Spartacus, too.
Report this comment
The_Cabrito_Goat
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 2:58pmWhat’s more realistic, banning all guns, or making sure there are no roadblocks in place for good people to exercise their freedoms without fear?
Well, in order to create a “gun registration” program for EVERY firearm in America would take a monolithic task force, a Herculean effort, and an enormous ramp up of an already over-sized government. Sounds very police state to me, your idea, Meteora.
Report this comment
Gladileftcalifornia
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:27pmI would like to meet just one of Feinstein’s gun owners that support her bill. Just one of these fictitious gun owners.
Report this comment
WildschweinJager
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:39pmThey are purported to be around. I know one troll here who likes to use his Kentucky Flintlock(joke, but not really) to hunt deer. He thinks AR 15s are bad.
Report this comment
jhrusky
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:47pmOh no, they are there. Trust me, they are certainly there as I’ve debated with them recently… they’re the ones who know that you don’t need an AR15 to go hunting and who believe the 2nd amendment is all about your right to go hunting.
Report this comment
myrwo6
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:50pmI think I’ll change my SN to SUCKSTOSTILLBEINCALIFORNIA.
Report this comment
guns-an-bibles
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:59pmOk, If these idiots want gun control let them try to take my guns and I will show them how I plan on controlling my guns!!!!
Report this comment
WildschweinJager
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:01pm@myrwo6
Or “Cali-Sucks”. The kids call it “Cali” now. It’s hip, cool and trendy.
Report this comment
BODYBAG
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:12pm@WILDSCHWEINJAGER
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:01pm
It’s hip, cool and trendy.
———————————–
Sure.
Just like the Chocolate King.
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:33pmHere you go these kind of gun owner’s agree and their ALL obama supporter’s. http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/04/16352612-weve-lost-respect-for-life-detroit-records-deadliest-year-in-decades?lite
Report this comment
herquegotsagun
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:33pmhere are the gun owners that support that bill. http://www.setyoufreenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Obama-with-U.S.-Secret-Service-agents.jpg
Report this comment
Joey8
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:38pmIn some states, there is no point to hunt with an AR-15 type rifle because the gubment makes it illegal to.
Report this comment
Trigus
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:41pmThere is not one person that is a firearm owner that supports this buffoon and here illegal legislation.
In an act of good will for fast and furious. The United States should give Mexico the State called California. We as a nation should put this to a vote.
Report this comment
WarMunger_Al
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 10:56pmTrigus-
I none of my rights are up for discussion, I certainly would not trust them to a vote
Report this comment
MIBUGNU2
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 6:38amWell said Marine !!! OORAH !!
Feinstein has said, the legislation will be carefully focused to protect the rights of existing gun owners by exempting hundreds of weapons used for hunting and sporting purposes.”
FU Miz.Fienstein.. I want the same kind of weapon you BOZOS hand out to all the
“BAD GUYS” around World… what a bunch of BULLSHI* !!! These dimwits can’t
even pass a friggen BUDGIT, but they want to screw with OUR RIGHTS..FOAH’s !!
and yes I am a former Marine and very well trained.. Semper Fi. !!
Report this comment
Armed Patriot
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 10:19amTrigus… In an act of good will for fast and furious. The United States should give Mexico the State called California. We as a nation should put this to a vote.
Hey bub, dont throw us all under the bus. The rural parts of The Peoplez Republik of Kalifornia voted against this demonic witch. My county has more CCW’s than the rest of the state combined. It was L.A. and San Fran that voted this left wing whore into office, not the rest of the state. Many of us are fighting the good fight behind enemy lines. If not her, another Barney Frank would step up.
Report this comment
ConserveUSA38
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 12:37pmI saw feidstein and Lindsey Graham on Fox and Lindsey said. That he has an assault rifle himself and disagrees with her. So if people in our own government have the same rifle that the nut job had that killed the children I think she is going to have a hard time passing ANY BILL!
It is OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT period. This amendment was written for the mere fact so the government CANNOT interfere in order to overpower the American citizens. We will and we do have the right do bear arms. If the government interferes with this they will be breaking the constitution and we cannot allow this to happen.
Report this comment
65Mustang
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:26pmFeinstein, your typical, progressive, Democrat b*tch…can’t believe a word that comes from her lying mouth.
Report this comment
Mil-Dot
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 5:13pmWild,
Isn’t that ironic. That they have learned the brutal trade from the NAZIs while they themselves were being gassed?
Report this comment
WildschweinJager
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 5:38pm@MIL
It is. I think it is mostly self hatred after so much anti-semitism over the past 2000 plus years. Israel at least acknowledges the dangers free peoples face, while ours think they are safe in their little insulated and anesthetized USA existence. Half of them think the USA did the 911 attack.
Report this comment
IndyGuy
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 8:45pmWildschweinJager
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:18pm
Unfortunately the Jews turn into the worst Nazis.
Uh…you sure you don’t mean they make the BEST Nazis???
Report this comment
OccamsSword
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 1:59amUnfortuatly the Jews turn into the “best” “worst” nazis? Unfortunatly the Americans also turn into the best or worst nazis… The proper logic is there are progrssive lib type jews, like Fienstein, Soros, and lots of others, that really hate Isreal, free markets and conservative values… Just like a third or more of Americans hate the same conservative values…Obama and his supporters, are the obvious examples…Then there are the fence sitters, most nowdays just side with who or what works best for them at the moment… The point is dont muddle the good hearted, conservative valued Jewish people with that Self hating ( very rich and successful, and evil )bunch.
Report this comment
techengineer11
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 2:30pmMil-Dot
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 5:13pm
Wild,
Isn’t that ironic. That they have learned the brutal trade from the NAZIs while they themselves were being gassed?
Unfortunay mildot, the Marxist Jews knew all too well about mass murder before WW2 was ever even dreamed of.. Just ask the 20 something million murdered in Russia at their hands before WW2..
The Nationalists were just trying to protect themselves, their country and the European continent from the savage manical marxist Jews.
Report this comment
Jarhead 88
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:17pmTech- Spare us with your Jew hate, I agree with you on many things but when you start with your BS, you lose all credibility, you moron.
Report this comment
techengineer11
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 7:02pmJarhead 88
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:17pm
Tech- Spare us with your Jew hate, I agree with you on many things but when you start with your BS, you lose all credibility, you moron.
Sometimes when we have to man up to how bad we have been deceived in this country it’s a tough pill to swallow. No one likes to admit that they’ve been a sucker.
That being said it’s time to hit the books jarhead. A mind is a terrible thing to waste.
Who did our hero Winston Churchill say was behind the Russian Revolution jarhead? A man of honor won’t run and hide from the truth will they jarhead?
Let me give you a hint just in case you are man enough to seek out the truth for yourself. (1920 London Times article by Winston Churchill “The Role of the Jews in the Russian Revolution”)
But who are we kidding? You’re not interested in the truth. You like being lied to because you’re a mere punk. A punk with no intelligence. A yes man. That’s all you are.. Certainly not a man of valor or honor because if you knew the truth you’d hate the filth as well.
Report this comment
Jarhead 88
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 8:38pmTech, nice load of BS, and all it does is confirm your antisemitism, pansy coward.
Report this comment
techengineer11
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 9:13pmJarhead 88
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 8:38pm
Tech, nice load of BS, and all it does is confirm your antisemitism, pansy coward.
But no answer. Does confirm your lunacy and cowardness. Is that what they taught you in the Corps? To run and cower from the truth?
Was Winston Churchill an anti-Semite for stating the truth? Now they did wind up owning his ole whoring drunkard ass but not in 1920.
Come on son man up. Don’t run from the truth. Embrace it.
Report this comment
techengineer11
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 9:15pmJarhead 88
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 8:38pm
Tech, nice load of BS, and all it does is confirm your antisemitism, pansy coward.
Futhermore I wrote a long list of names behind the assualt on the 2nd amendment above.. Sort of like the whose who in American politics but I left out Mayor Bloomberg another Communist piece of ***ish filth.. Do you bury your head in the sand and deny that as well?
Report this comment
skippy6
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:24pmUnconstitutional laws are not laws. Problem is that Barry and his voters don’t believe in the constitution in whole… They pick and choose or just sidestep at their convenience….
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:31pmReally just berry and the libs? How many on here think a convicted felon should not be able to own a gun?
Report this comment
dissentnow
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:41pm@Skippy
“Unconstitutional laws are not laws. Problem is that Barry and his voters don’t believe in the constitution in whole… They pick and choose or just sidestep at their convenience”
Its not just Barry and his voters that pick and choose from the constitution. What about Bush and all of his voters that supported the patriot act and domestic spy programs?
Report this comment
wisconsinlcm
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:44pmWHO said anything about felons,there is already laws about that.Do you know what you are taking about.
Report this comment
myrwo6
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:52pmDepends on what he was convicted of.
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:54pmyes i know and ALL gun laws are UNConstitutional you progressive! I bet you think felon’s follow the law to huh? If their that much of a threat remove them from society. Don’t let the murderers/rapist/armed robbers and many more back on the street.
Report this comment
Mil-Dot
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:06pmThe progs and their constituents will find out the hard way about the constitution and our resolve to defend it. Sadly, it will take much bloodshed and tears for them to get the message. We will not be the USA again until they are all driven out or killed. The truth is hard to swallow, I know. Our brave veterans and active duty patriots, as well as our Oathkeepers will lead the rest of us to victory. But, it will be brutal, make no mistake.
Report this comment
Brother Winston Smith
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:11pm…and Bushy and his leftist republican voters who DON’T BELIEVE IN THE CONSTITUTION… with their Medicare Part D, NCLB, TARP, Bailouts, “Patriot” Acts, TSA, VIPR teams, roaming drones, SOPA/PIPA/CISPA, etc, etc… ALL UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Report this comment
Fat Hubie
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:11pmTrying to shift the rhetoric to hunting guns don’t fly. I’m trying to maintain the security of a FREE state.
I have a clear picture of what I need and do not need help from pathetic liberals choosing it. If it is not within the bounds of the constitution it cannot be a law. They caused a sellout of ARs all over America.
I’m sure everyone who paid tripple price for them will be glad to hand them over along with their freedom and their country. HONEST!
Report this comment
BODYBAG
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:14pm@MIL-DOT
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:06pm
We will not be the USA again until they are all driven out or killed. The truth is hard to swallow, I know. But, it will be brutal, make no mistake.
———————————
Bullseye. Thank you.
Report this comment
booger71
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:42pmLegalizing Drugs – I am Liberal
Constitution – I am Conservative
War – I am Liberal (opposed to these Campaigns)
==================
It depends on what the felony was and whether if someone who is convicted of a crime and serves his sentence and serves his debt to society, why is this person still treated as criminal?
Report this comment
booger71
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:44pmDon’t let the murderers/rapist/armed robbers and many more back on the street.
=============
If a thief that robbed some at knife point, would you let him buy a knife after release?
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 5:01pmHey booger you don’t know what armed robbery mean’s? You think that only apply’s if it’s a gun?
Report this comment
brother_ed
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 5:32pm@BRO SMITH
It would be great if we only passed laws that were constututional.
It seems we pass laws and then wait to see if gets struck down by the SCOTUS, which doesn’t make sense to me.
It seems the checks and balances either aren’t working, or the system is being overwhelmed with too many laws.
Maybe it’s time to start over…
Report this comment
mercenary4freedom
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 6:21pmBoston did not waiver one bit. He made that traitorous CNN sleeze-ball Randie look like an idiot.
Report this comment
mercenary4freedom
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 7:54pmDuring the Revolutionary War I f I am not mistaken, all the corrupt politicians and loyalists that were not hanged were put in nasty, smelly, disease ridden dungeons. I hear it was a life they were not accustomed to.
Report this comment
Eternal
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 9:55pmWhich is why we are armed
Report this comment
Jarhead 88
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 10:01pmMil-Dot is right on target, this country will not be free again unless the enemy is defeated and I don’t really care how.
Report this comment
decendentof56
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 8:41amSkippy6…..Of course, this goes much deeper than merely Obama. Yes, anyone who tries to make the case that “Barry” is a Constitutionalist would rightly be laughed at as an idiot, one incapable of rational thought.
Obama has his handlers, to be sure. Valerie Jarrett has as much say as Obama. If she does, its because she is an ideological match to the point that he completely trusts her decisions to be in lock-step with his.
Remember, too, that Obama has surrounded himself (some have left, or been “outed”) with some anti-American ideologs like himself.
Back to the point….Obama’s election/re-election has allowed the (“what Constitution”?) crowd to come out in full force. And they are a force.
Feinstein , Franken, Lautenberg, Boxer, Wasserman-Schultz, Grayson, etc, will be more than willing to deamonize gun-rights supporters as “racist”, “fearful of blacks”, “racist tea-pertiers”, etc.
No justification is needed! Didn’t Hitler, Stalin, Castro, Mao, Pol-Pot/Kymer Rouge, etc, make sure the “subjects” were unarmed?
No…I’m afraid I will have to decline Feinstein’s offer to “voluntarily” disarm, just like the young Marine.
Report this comment
Eric_The_Red_State
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:24pmOn a funnier note – doesn’t Cpl Boston look like “Spivey” from Dances with Wolves?
Report this comment
Gorp
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:04pmHe sort of looks like a young Chuck Norris.
Report this comment
338lapua
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 5:55pmThe only reason I am still alive is because Chuck Norris hasn’t decided its my day to die!
Report this comment
jakartaman
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 6:50pmI have had it with Government
They want more of my $$
They want my guns
They want to tell me what to do when to do it etc.
With this socialist (Obama) we ARE NOW a Nanny state like France
I blame the 51% morons that voted for him – I hope the union whores liek gubbling at his feet.
I don’t care what law they pass – I am retired old and mean –
The second amendment was to have the citizenry have guns to over throw a tyrannical Government – Well if the come for the guns – they have declared war and proved that they are tyrannical – We can either fight them individually or start a society of concerned citizens – maybe the TEA Party would be appropriate?
Report this comment
wzanesdad
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 10:24pmjakartaman,
Yo’u're absolutely right. Organization is going to be the key to all this. Everyone needs to be involved with the tea party, or freedom works, or a 9-12 project, or a militia, or just a group of neighbors. No one will be able to stand alone on this. whatever they choose…..they better do it fast. This is coming soon. My only suggestion would be, that when choosing a group to be involved with, make sure the main thing they have in common with you is to restore the constitution….all of it.eything else, we can deal with later. We have to get out country back. we are the only hope this world has.
Report this comment
WarMunger_Al
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 11:05pmWZ-
the problem is, i don’t trust my neighbors (too many are liberals, and some are just plain jerks), “militia” groups are usually infiltrated by feds if not set up by them to begin with. I have wasted too many years overseas in the military and now do not have sufficient roots here in the States to have enough people I can truly trust. We will see see who is trustworthy aster this stuff gets passed and they try and enforce it.
Report this comment
jakartaman
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 2:17pmThe TEA Party is in Place and has an organization. Join and find like minded individuals.
Elect tea party congressmen like Rand Paul in 2014 (if we ;last that long).
The biggest enemy is apathy – remember 51% voted for a Known Proven Socialist – We are out numbered but certainly not out gunned! and He will NOT get mine – no matter what law might be passed – The constitution trumps these expedient laws.
Report this comment
avgconservative
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:23pmRegistering guns only gives the government knowledge of where law abiding citizens who own guns, live. This knowledge will allow them to confiscate guns from law abiding citizens due to the illegal use by a microcosm of criminals.
It will end when law enforcement people, whom most support the second amendment, will die in the line of duty when constitutionalists defend themselves from King Obama and his Frankenstein minions. I will be among those who will die to protect the second amendment.
Report this comment
rcguy
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:39pmBetter to die a free man than live as a slave.
Report this comment
wisconsinlcm
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:54pmThere isn’t a liberal out there that would understand anything you have just said,it would be completly out of their relm of thout.
Report this comment
WarMunger_Al
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:01pmThe majority of police do not support the rights of the people. The majority will impose the emperor’s will without question, as they do everyday on multitudes of unconstitutional laws. Where in the constitution does it give them the right to kick your door in and shoot you over suspected drug use?
How about the daily harassment of citizens in NYC where the cops “randomly” pat down and search people who are minding their own business? There are some good, oath keeping police out there, but the the majority are and will be the enemy to free people.
Report this comment
Mil-Dot
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:13pmWar,
Do not fret. When the SHTF, they will be wiped out. Everybody note this: All combined federal, state and local police including FBI, ATF, IRS and all the other goons number approx 900,000 total. There are 5 million NRA alone with about 80 million American gun owners. We have a military of approx 1.6 million total. Of that 1 in 7 are combat troops, the rest are support or techs. Know the numbers.
Report this comment
WarMunger_Al
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:23pmMIL-DOT-
It is nice to see the numbers, helps to keep the perspective ;)
Report this comment
Banner_Yet_Wave
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:22pmQuestion: What is up with that second amendment? ‘Well Regulated Militia?’ , ‘Right to bear arms?’. Did those guys who wrote this think we needed arms to join militias?
Answer: The greatest concern of our nation’s builders was the preservation of the republic. Historically republics fall at the hands of dictators backed by the military. The roman republic fell to Caesar’s legions. British occupation was brutal. Murder, rape, property seizures, quartering of soldiers. No human rights or even human dignities are allowed under tyranny. Yet a military is needed to protect from outside forces. It is a necessary evil. The constitution created the ‘Well Regulated Militia’ or the National Guard as the primary protectors of the republic. Citizen soldiers were deemed safer than professionals. Yet, Everyone still feared this federal armed force. It would be the tool of dictators. Before ratification the writers of the constitution had to defend the National Militia from critics. The critics drove the creation of the bill of rights and the 1st 10 amendments to the constitution. A well-regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. We are not given this right so we can join militias. We are given this right to protect ourselves from the militia.
Report this comment
grimmster
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:47pm@Banner,i agree with all but the last sentence. In the words of Suzanna Gracia Hupp,and im paraphrasing but close “the second amendment is not there so we can have guns to hunt, or protect us from the bad guys, but to protect us from you”,(as she pointed to senators i believe.).Who is she you ask,look her up on youtube?! She watched her parents get murdered in Lubys cafeteria in Killeen Tx.oct 16 1991. Everyone, especially libturds needs to watch this video before it goes away,it very poinent,and applyys as much common sense today, as it did back then.
Report this comment
Lt_Scrounge
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:54pmOne of the founding fathers said that the primary reason for the Second Amendment was to insure that the people retain the ability to protect themselves from those who would impose tyranny upon them, including their own government.
I have this question for Senator Feinstein. “Do you REALLY believe that you will get 100% compliance with this gun confiscation scheme, or are you so stupid as to believe that you will be able to suppress the revolt that will result if only 5% of the gun owners say #$%^& you, Molon Labe?”
Report this comment
Lt_Scrounge
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:58pmI agree Grimmster. Dr Hupp told them off in the Senate. Did you see how much Chuck U Shumer was squirming when she pointed at the bunch of Senators? There is another YouTube Video that everyone should see and it’s the series of videos put together by the JPFO and Dr Ignacio Piazza. It shows how tyrants have used gun control to disarm their populaces and then proceeded to commit genocide during the 20th Century. It’s VERY graphic, so I recommend that people keep that in mind.
Report this comment
All Pro
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:17pmUnited States Code: Title 10 – Armed Forces
Subtitle A – General Military Law
Chapter 13 – The Militia
Sec. 311. Militia: composition and classes
•(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
•(b) The classes of the militia are –
•(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard
and the Naval Militia; and
•(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of
the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the
Naval Militia.
WE are the unregulated militia!
http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/dick-act-of-1902
http://www.alternatewars.com/Congress/Dick_Act.htm
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/311
http://usgovinfo.about.com/blusmilitia.htm
Report this comment
Eric_The_Red_State
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:17pmDont be duped here people.
This bill is there to introduce ridiculous bills that are designed to make the REAL bill that they want to introduce later look less ridiculous.
Typical Liberal trick – - – Ask for X — when what you really want is Y and settle for Z.
I say – NO.
NO to anything.
NO compromise
NO change to our protection
NO to any modification of the 2nd Amendment
Report this comment
Gorp
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:31pmI love this part: “As Senator Feinstein has said, the legislation will be carefully focused to protect the rights of existing gun owners by exempting hundreds of weapons used for hunting and sporting purposes.”
I’m wondering what part of the 2nd Amendment has anything to do with hunting and sporting. I can’t find it anywhere I look or in anything I read pertaining to the 2nd Amendment. I must not be looking in the right places.
Report this comment
Thighmaster
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:34pmI’ll bet the American Indian wishes they had said no to gun control and giving up their guns. How’s that working out for them ?
Report this comment
ldonnell
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:40pmthey tried to stage a crisis with fast and furrious to take away our arms,i have to question if the school shooting wasn’t planed as well.
Report this comment
gothope
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:29pmNot that I believe it but the fathers of both aurora and sandy hook were witnesses in a trial against libor which implicated giethner and bernancke
Report this comment
M1A2_Tanker
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 6:08pmWith that Statement she is creating two classes of Gun Owners, 1: Hunters 2: Evil Black Assault Rifle Killers. Simple Divide and conquer tactics. We must resist this reclassification at all costs. Think “Rules for Radicals”.
Report this comment
ImWatchingYouAll
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:15pmThe 2nd Amendment gives the people the right to own the most advanced weapon at the time of it’s signing, therefore, we should be able to own the most advanced weapon of our time, because the 2nd amendment does NOT stipulate what type of weapon we may bare.
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:28pmOh yes it does. It’s their. In order for a well regulated militia to be able to take back the country from a over reaching government the malitia must as well armed as the government.If not MORE well armed!!!
Report this comment
BODYBAG
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:55pm“Militias, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves and include all men capable of bearing arms. [...] To preserve liberty it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them. ”
– Senator Richard Henry Lee, 1788, on “militia” in the 2nd Amendment
Report this comment
critterbait
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:14pmEvil that creeps around in the dark,,, the light will find evil no matter how hard it trys to hide,,, no matter what form or shape it takes or how many diffrent ways it says the same thing …A lesson to be learn by many…The light will come,,, no power on God’s Green Earth can stop it …
Report this comment
CatB
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:57pmIt is really quite easy to see now .. for those who have their eyes open .. and not their hand out … it is
“the government”.
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:14pmSince our elected representatives have not stood up to the constant escalating over-reach of the Chicago radical Democrats, the American people must do this. Maybe an Occupy D.C. Movement is in order.
Report this comment
WildschweinJager
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:34pmA lot of us who care will be at work and can’t miss work. Good idea though.
Report this comment
wisconsinlcm
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:38pmYES,we need to do something because the ones we have sent to washington are not doing us any good.I really like the line that Feinstein’s has received letters from gun owners wanting more gun laws,just how foolish are these people to think that someone would believe that.They really don’t care what they say or if we believe it or not.
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:42pmYeah because your job is more important than your freedom?
Report this comment
WarMunger_Al
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:08pmprotests are useless and don’t effect any change. It just rounds you up in a convenient place to be subjugated by law enforcement. The only real change will happen when these wanna-be tyrant politicians are meted out the punishment for their treason.
Report this comment
dissentnow
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:12pmThe libs want gun control for the same reason that the repubs wanted the patriot act; to make us “safer”. In both cases, we give up our freedoms and we don’t become safe. This is Tyranny in the form of safety. Both sides of the isle our cowards who give up their freedoms out of fear.
Report this comment
truthnstuff
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:22pmHowever, Congress as criminal elites will once again be exempt from any laws they pass.
Report this comment
Thighmaster
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:23pmBelieve me when I say they don’t care about making us safer, they care about making themselves safer. They do, however, care about votes so they make “feel good” laws that make us less free and less safe. Attorneys thrive off of criminal activity not off of honest citizens.
Report this comment
dissentnow
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:49pmThese laws are not meant to make us safe. They are meant to take away our rights, thus making us less safe. The government needs the useful idiots on both sides of the political isle to be in a constant state of terror so that they willingly hand over their rights. If you scare the people enough, they’ll run to the government to keep them safe and they wont fight back when the government starts taking their rights.
Report this comment
ZAP
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:11pm“Unconstitutional laws aren’t laws.”
Report this comment
ZAP
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:15pmUnconstitutional laws aren’t laws.
Report this comment
dissentnow
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:17pmThats never stopped a politician before
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:39pmThat’s because WE don’t stop them from doing it…..
Report this comment
Mil-Dot
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:26pmA patriot with the capability needs to publish a list of the names of all politicians, all of their family members, where they live and the GPS coordinates of their homes and properties. Every patriot should inform him or herself of the location of these vermin. Let them know that we know where THEY live and reside just like they avail themselves of our locations. That includes all Federal ” law enforcement officers” (gag) as well. Fight fire with fire.
Report this comment
dissentnow
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:50pm@civilwar
Speak for yourself. With the exception of Ron Paul, i have NEVER voted for a republican or a democrat. I have always voted libertarian or constitution party.
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 5:09pmI wasn’t talking about voteing that don’t work. I meant we don’t stand up when voteing doesn’t work. Ever here of anyone calling for an elected official to be re-called for voteing for a gun controll law?
Report this comment
iampraying4u
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 7:58pmAmen
Report this comment
dissentnow
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 9:36amThe solution to the problem is to stop voting for idiots. Seriously. Its just that simple. If you elect someone that has honor and who makes a commitment to uphold and defend the constitution, then you wont have to re-call him/her at a later date. If by chance he/she turns out to be a puke, vote him/her out during the next election cycle. Voting is the ultimate weapon. You should use it while you still can.
Again, stop voting for idiots. A good place to start is to stop voting for people with an “R” or a “D” at the end of their names.
Report this comment
Fecal_Matters
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:04pmOk…I had enough. The Constitution spells out Our Rights!…not the Rights of the Government.
“I, having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God.” SOooo Efff U Senator Feinstein and all you gun grabbers Eff U! μολὼν λαβέ
Report this comment
subic
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:15pm@ CNN, by the way douchebags, he is not a former Marine. Once a Marine Always a Marine.
Report this comment
mcmeador
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:02pmI’m glad to know our constitutional right to hunt and sport will be protected…
Report this comment
NHwinter
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:40pmmcmeador – Not for long. UN Agenda 21 will eventually take away our property rights and turn most of America back to wilderness and the animals will be protected for humans will not be permitted to enter the wilderness. Its coming.
Report this comment
BODYBAG
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:01pm““As Senator Feinstein has said, the legislation will be carefully focused to protect the rights of existing gun owners by exempting hundreds of weapons used for hunting and sporting purposes.”
What part of “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” do you NOT understand Senator ?
The 2nd Amendment IS NOT about some GD hunting or sporting rifles.
The 2nd Amendment IS ALL ABOUT We The People protecting ourselves against YOU MF’ing Authoritarian ZEALOTS.
You ALL need an attitude check. We have NOT forgotten this little exchange:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0CprVYsG0k
Report this comment
BODYBAG
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:27pm“the legislation will be carefully focused to protect the rights of existing gun owners by exempting hundreds of weapons used for hunting and sporting purposes.”
This section is a very very clever little progressive propaganda tactic.
Cpl Boston is 100% spot-on —– The words “sporting” & “hunting” do NOT appear in the Bill Of Rights.
Report this comment
Tri-ox
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:00pmFeinstein, obama, and their ilk, are sworn enemies of the United States, and our Constitutional rights.
Report this comment
Mil-Dot
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 5:01pmMake no mistake, an 80 year old fake Jewish crow will not disarm this country. Anybody want to make a bet? And, the goons that side with her and their families will meet a terrible fate.
Report this comment
Av8tor056
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 2:59pmWhere in the Constitution does it say the Second Amendment is about hunting and sporting purposes? I must have missed that part.
Report this comment
WildschweinJager
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:07pmThat is the unspoken Jewish, white-guilt, black fear of whitey, pacifist part.
Report this comment
Thighmaster
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 2:58pmGet it through your thick heads government, the second amendment was not written to protect our hunting rights, it was written to protect us from YOU !
Report this comment
Look4DBigPicture
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:07pmAmen … and with the way the government is ‘progressing’, we may need that protection sooner rather than later.
Report this comment
BODYBAG
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:08pmDemand A REAL Plan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgCemznb6Lc
Report this comment
Babci
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 2:57pmI have a hard time believing that gun owners are calling Diane Feinstein in support of her bill.
Call her office…202-224-3121…we need to let her hear from gun owners who DON’T support her bill.
Report this comment
Babci
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:03pmYou can’t leave a message on the weekend at the DC number I provided. Call her San Diego office now (619-231-9712) and tell her she’s nuts. My parents live in zipcode 91950, so I was calling for them.
Report this comment
blanco5
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:17pmYea, it sounds like BS to me too. Just about any gun owner I know would NOT support anything regarding taking away from law abiding citizens. Thanks for providing the numbers!
Report this comment
Eric_The_Red_State
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:20pmFinally – a person with an ACTION ITEM – Thank you BABCI !!
I wish others would actually DO something instead of just talk about it.
I’m calling now.
Report this comment
avgconservative
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:31pmEric,
Don’t worry about us DOING something. We will do plenty when the civil war starts over firearms. Pity so many good law enforcement personnel will be hurt/maimed/killed when King Obama and the Dutchess of California order the confiscation of our weapons. We will do much, including killing, being killed, and going to prison, to defend the second amendment.
Report this comment
BODYBAG
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:37pm@ERIC_THE_RED_STATE
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:20pm
Finally – a person with an ACTION ITEM – Thank you BABCI !!
I wish others would actually DO something instead of just talk about it.
————————————————————-
Im all for you in principle. But I also know that no volume of calls or letters will
dissuade these zealots. This is a HOLY GRAIL item of Progressive p o r n.
The Chocolate King has vowed it will happen “quickly”. His drunken side-kick
has been dispatched “guaranteeing” lawmakers from coast to coast that it WILL happen.
They arent going to back down over some phone calls and letters. You see her
response to Cpl Boston already.
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:49pmThank You! Just called her office. We will NOT comply!
Report this comment
BODYBAG
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:07pm@BODYBAG
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:37pm
This is a HOLY GRAIL item of Progressive p o r n.
————————————————————-
Make NO MISTAKE. These people stay up late at night “pleasuring themselves” in bed
with erotic fantasies about repealing the 2nd amendment and disarming the citizens.
Dispel ANY doubts you may have about this.
Report this comment
randy
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 2:56pmHe very calmly put that smug bit@h in her place.
I’m surprised CNN even allowed him to be on.
Guess they thought they could make him look like an idiot.
Report this comment
tonypro
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:00pmThis was my exact thought, and this young man –without trying–made her look like the puppet she is.
Report this comment
Patriot760
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 2:56pmDITTO! Randy. I stand with Cpl. Boston.
Report this comment
AmericanStrega
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 2:54pmThe Second isn’t about hunting and sporting. IT’S ABOUT KEEPING A GOVERNMENT FROM CREATING TYRANNY!
Report this comment
Thighmaster
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:00pmIf we say that enough maybe it will catch on…
Report this comment
CathyvanDyke
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 5:54pmRonald Reagan – 40th President of the USA (1981-1989)
“There are those in America today who have come to depend absolutely on government for their security. And when government fails they seek to rectify that failure in the form of granting government more power. So, as government has failed to control crime and violence with the means given it by the Constitution, they seek to give it more power at the expense of the Constitution. But in doing so, in their willingness to give up their arms in the name of safety, they are really giving up their protection from what has always been the chief source of despotism — government.”
Report this comment
kaydeebeau
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 2:53pmTue that – the sooner we and our states (through our “encouragement”) realize that the better – our govt serves via our consent – I no longer consent to soft tyranny under the guise of “laws” from DC. If it isn’t in Article I Section 8 (and I also do not care what the SCOTUS says) I will not comply
Report this comment
randy
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 2:51pmFeinstein’s office said in a statement she “respects Cpl. Boston’s service.”
“She has heard from thousands of people — including many gun owners — who support her plan to stop the sale, transfer, importation and manufacturing of assault weapons and large capacity magazines, strips and drums that hold more than 10 rounds,” the statement said.
BUUSHlT!!!
Report this comment
Dkoonz
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:06pmI will not comply with these anti-gun nuts who carry or are protected by armed agents who would squash the 2nd amendment so they have complete power over the people.
Report this comment
subic
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:12pmAgree RAND, that’s more buushit propaganda by the hussien controlled media. Which by the way is quickly becoming irrelevent.
Way to go Cpl. Boston, we’re behind you 100% brother!
Report this comment
BODYBAG
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:12pm@RANDY
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 2:51pm
Feinstein’s office said in a statement she “respects Cpl. Boston’s service.”
————————————————
Thats nothing more than condescending pabulum.
Report this comment
truthnstuff
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 3:35pmShe doesn’t respect the Constitution, therefore she doesn’t respect anyone who does. She only respects the force of government to place it’s boot on the necks of us little people.
Report this comment
herquegotsagun
Posted on January 5, 2013 at 4:32pmHere are the gun owners that support feinsteins bill. http://www.setyoufreenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Obama-with-U.S.-Secret-Service-agents.jpg
Report this comment
Cyber Geezer
Posted on January 6, 2013 at 8:44pmFeinstein’s statement is a non-statement!! They make up facts and figures and pull statistics out of thin air and we’re all suppose to believe them because they are the elite elected who only want to protect us from ourselves. PURE BS …
Report this comment
Dismayed Veteran
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 10:29amCut to the chase. Living the 2nd Amendment is our final and best hope of repairing the USA.
Report this comment