Watch Live: Obama’s Counterterrorism Speech

Watch Today’s BlazeCast With Your Questions, Comments & Live Chat!

Media

Which Democratic Freshman Is Opposing ‘Extreme’ Gun Control? Find Out Here

Jan. 6, 2013 5:15pm

If we told you a Democratic Senator had openly criticized the Obama administration for pushing “extreme” measures on gun control that don’t address the problem, while proudly advertising an “A” rating from the NRA, would you believe it?

You should, because that’s exactly what’s happening right now. The Washington Post reports that Senator Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota has done all of the above and then some in criticizing her party’s moral panic over guns in the wake of the Sandy Hook shooting:

“I think you need to put everything on the table, but what I hear from the administration — and if the Washington Post is to be believed — that’s way, way in extreme of what I think is necessary or even should be talked about.  And it’s not going to pass,” Heitkamp said on ABC News’s “This Week With George Stephanopoulos.”[...]

Heitkamp, a freshman senator, has received an “A” rating from the National Rifle Association, the nation’s largest gun-rights group. She said that addressing mental health issues should also be an important part of curbing mass violence.

Senator Heidi Heitkamp Says Obama Administration Gun Control Measures Extreme

Heidi Heitkamp (Photo credit: Boston Globe)

“Let’s start addressing the problem.  And to me, one of the issues that I think comes — screams out of this is the issue of mental health and the care for the mentally ill in our country, especially the dangerously mentally ill.  And so we need to have a broad discussion before we start talking about gun control,” Heitkamp said.

Watch Heitkamp make these comments on the “This Week” panel below:

Heitkamp’s apparent heresy relative to her party is not a new phenomenon in the Senate. Every now and then a legislator will buck their party on an issue that, while beloved by the national party leadership, is a surefire loser in their home state. Democrat Joe Manchin has bucked the Democrats before on issues pertaining to energy for precisely this reason. Heitkamp, who pulled out a surprise upset against Republican Rick Berg last year, must be aware that she needs to cultivate the love of her home state if she wants to avoid future vulnerability. This type of messaging certainly accomplishes that goal.

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Comments (106)

1 2
  • ClemBradshaw
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 7:48pm

    She’ll cave to the party line

    Report this comment

    ClemBradshaw  
    • Onesimus
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 7:55pm

      Add your comments

      Report this comment

      Onesimus  
    • KeystoneState
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 8:07pm

      A democrat senator who’s “pro-gun” huh? Sounds like they can spare her gun vote to keep her in office to go with the rest of their agenda. Kinda like Tim Holden here in PA getting a Pelosi pass on Obamacare.

      Report this comment

      KeystoneState  
  • TRILO
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 7:19pm

    She say’s one thing, let’s see what she actually does. If she is like the republicans one thing will come out of her mouth and her vote will reflect something absolutely unconstitutional or harmful to the country.

    Report this comment

    TRILO  
  • 1TrueOne55
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 7:16pm

    So will she fight to allow Korean War Surplus Weapons back into the country for those who want to Collect or Shoot the weapons of History that saved half a peninsula from Communism? They sit in US Army Warehouses and this admin has been stopping them from being re-sold in the US. With this Gov’t so far in debt why would you kill a significant source of income from your own supply chain.

    Report this comment

    1TrueOne55  
    • Pogue
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 9:24pm

      Clinton had chipped up millions of Morgan dollars, melted into ingots and sold them at 3 dollars an ounce to pay off the national debt, at a time when even a worn Morgan was fetching 8 to 12 dollars each.

      I wouldn’t put it past Obama to turn a 600 to 800 dollar, collector, piece of US history into 6 cents worth scrap metal, and! Obama will spend Billions doing it.

      Report this comment

      Pogue  
  • MrKnowItAll
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 6:47pm

    Everyone is Poor in the Democratic Party, Except their Leader’s. That Song did it. “Your Money For Nothing, Your Chicks For Free!” Hurry Ban it. Better Way Late. Then Never.

    Report this comment

    MrKnowItAll  
  • mykidswillbfree
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 6:46pm

    I am an older father and husband who has relatively young children boy 13 girl 11. Like most fathers they are everything to me.My greatest shame is that I have let their freedom slip away. We must get it back no matter the cost.I unfortunately have a terminal illness that makes me fear I will not last to see it returned to them. Please Stand with me at every opportunity to deny the takers of freedom and call them what they are evil. Future generations will remember that more than anything else you can do for them.

    Report this comment

    mykidswillbfree  
  • barber2
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 6:44pm

    Why don’t you Trolls get real jobs ? Oh, forgot: Obama is still in the White House…

    Report this comment

    barber2  
  • OneWithGodistheMajority
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 6:40pm

    They’ll get her straightened out in no time. Most likely already done. She’ll get the dim talking points from now on and won’t stray ever again after her spanking.

    Report this comment

    OneWithGodistheMajority  
  • barber2
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 6:32pm

    But will rational Democrats separate themselves from the Chicago radicals ? Doubt it since the Media Matters Daddy War-bucks supports the Chicago radical agenda and droned Obama on America by means of those very Lefty Media big bucks he invested ! The Lefty MSM protects the Chicago radicals just as the Lefty media targets and smears conservatives. We now have Trial By Media ( Zimmerman / Secret Service / Petraeus ) and Character Assassination by Media ( name any leading conservative ! )

    Report this comment

    barber2  
  • stevetherealist
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 6:22pm

    plenty of democrats don’t want to see gun control. We understand a maniac will find their means. If its not a gun it will be something else. Plain and simple. The problem is, there is a way to minimize damage caused by the lunatics by reducing fire power and that will appeal to the vocal gun opponents. What we really need is a waiting period before legislation can be introduced so cooler heads prevail and not a kneejerk result nobody wants in ten years.

    Report this comment

    stevetherealist  
    • barber2
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 6:35pm

      What ? Wait ? Wait ? That is not part of the Chicago radicals’ modus operandi : Never Waste a Crisis ! Act quickly ! Get that agenda out there fast ! Use the media ! Fast …..

      Report this comment

      barber2  
    • SGT Rock
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 6:50pm

      From the Washington Post: Timing is imperative

      Obama’s advisers have calculated that the longer they wait, the more distance there is from the Newtown massacre and the greater the risk that the bipartisan political will to tackle gun violence will dissipate.

      “This is not something that I will be putting off,” Obama said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” in an interview broadcast last Sunday.

      At the White House meeting, Stanek said, “the vice president indicated that there was a very short timeline for him to get back to the president with his recommendations because the American public has a short memory.”

      Already, three weeks after the Newtown shooting, gun-control advocates are growing impatient with a legislative process that is just beginning.

      “As we get involved in these ad nauseam debates over the Second Amendment, our children are still at risk,” said Jon Adler, national president of the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association. “Debating is not the action verb we need to protect our children.”

      It also states in the article that they are planning an end run around Congress so we the people do not have a say in this. This will be another late night cram down your throat legsilation that no one reads. Do not comply.

      YOU ARE THE RESISTANCE, RESIST NOW or forever fall under the tyrants heel.

      Report this comment

      SGT Rock  
    • TRILO
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 7:15pm

      A result we do not want in 10 years, how about 10 days or better yet 10 minutes. The irrational gun control measures these lunatics want to pass will do nothing to stop criminals from committing murder. The law abiding citizens will feel the impact immediately if these laws are passed. Criminals could care less.

      Just like you can get drugs on every corner, place a ban on semi-automatic rifles or handguns and they will be easier to get. Prohibition on anything has never worked, it only makes the problem worse.

      Report this comment

      TRILO  
    • mercenary4freedom
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 9:48pm

      Good intel SGT ROCK. They are going to try any an all trickery they can. This is from Gun Owners of America

      ——————————————————————————–

      Whether the Semi-Auto Ban Passes May
      Depend on What Happens to the Senate Rules

      McCain may be working to stab us in the back

      Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is still trying to rig the Senate rules so that President Barack Obama can get his anti-gun and anti-Constitution agenda passed.

      But first, here’s some good news.

      GOA activists like yourself are having an impact!

      Prior to the New Year, the reports coming out of Washington, DC indicated that Senator Harry Reid was going to nuke the filibuster on the first day of the new Congress (which would have been yesterday).

      But Politico, which is one of the official papers of Capitol Hill, reported yesterday that Reid still doesn’t have the votes — despite having a Democrat majority.

      The Politico headline blared: “Reid expected to Postpone Filibuster Rule Change: May buy time for a bipartisan bill.”

      This is somewhat good news, as it means that Reid still can’t cram a rules change down our throats, limiting the ability that pro-gun Senators have to filibuster (or kill) anti-gun legislation.

      But here’s the bad news: Reid is working on a “compromise” where certain RINO’s like John McCain will help Reid do his bidding.

      What’s at stake?

      Well, The Blaze reported yesterday that Vice President Joe

      Report this comment

      mercenary4freedom  
    • mercenary4freedom
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 10:03pm

      What’s at stake?

      Well, The Blaze reported yesterday that Vice President Joe Biden “guaranteed” to ailing Boston Mayor Tom Menino that sweeping gun control legislation would be passed by the end of January.

      How sweeping?

      A quick look at Feinstein’s semi-auto ban legislation suggests that up to 75% of all handguns currently in circulation would be banned, along with as much as 50% of all long guns.

      Depending on its configuration, the AR-15 you already have would probably be treated like a machine gun. You would have to be fingerprinted, background checked by the FBI, and undergo a six-month license application process to keep it. And when you die, the government will seize it.

      If you don’t get an NFA license, you can expect the SWAT teams to descend on your house.

      But, you ask, how could such rabidly anti-gun legislation ever get past Congress? Well, legislators could simply follow the path they took on the fiscal cliff, where they bludgeoned a minority of Senators into accepting several, coerced short-cuts in regard to the Senate rules.

      However, these forced short-cuts would now become mandated and set in stone if Harry Reid & Co. get their way.

      Under one new “compromise” being floated on Capitol Hill, the Senate would change its rules so that it could pass a gun ban with only 50 votes (plus the vote of Vice President Joe Biden). Or legislators could write the gun ban in a House-Senate conference committee on a “must-pass” bill, emplo

      Report this comment

      mercenary4freedom  
    • mercenary4freedom
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 10:15pm

      Gun Owners of America

      ——————————————————————————–

      Whether the Semi-Auto Ban Passes May
      Depend on What Happens to the Senate Rules

      McCain may be working to stab us in the back

      Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is still trying to rig the Senate rules so that President Barack Obama can get his anti-gun and anti-Constitution agenda passed.

      But first, here’s some good news.

      GOA activists like yourself are having an impact!

      Prior to the New Year, the reports coming out of Washington, DC indicated that Senator Harry Reid was going to nuke the filibuster on the first day of the new Congress (which would have been yesterday).

      But Politico, which is one of the official papers of Capitol Hill, reported yesterday that Reid still doesn’t have the votes — despite having a Democrat majority.

      The Politico headline blared: “Reid expected to Postpone Filibuster Rule Change: May buy time for a bipartisan bill.”

      This is somewhat good news, as it means that Reid still can’t cram a rules change down our throats, limiting the ability that pro-gun Senators have to filibuster (or kill) anti-gun legislation.

      But here’s the bad news: Reid is working on a “compromise” where certain RINO’s like John McCain will help Reid do his bidding.

      What’s at stake?

      Well, The Blaze reported yesterday that Vice President Joe Biden “guaranteed” to ailing Boston Mayor Tom Menino that sweeping gun control leg

      Report this comment

      mercenary4freedom  
    • mercenary4freedom
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 10:19pm

      Well, The Blaze reported yesterday that Vice President Joe Biden “guaranteed” to ailing Boston Mayor Tom Menino that sweeping gun control legislation would be passed by the end of January.

      How sweeping?

      A quick look at Feinstein’s semi-auto ban legislation suggests that up to 75% of all handguns currently in circulation would be banned, along with as much as 50% of all long guns.

      Depending on its configuration, the AR-15 you already have would probably be treated like a machine gun. You would have to be fingerprinted, background checked by the FBI, and undergo a six-month license application process to keep it. And when you die, the government will seize it.

      If you don’t get an NFA license, you can expect the SWAT teams to descend on your house.

      But, you ask, how could such rabidly anti-gun legislation ever get past Congress? Well, legislators could simply follow the path they took on the fiscal cliff, where they bludgeoned a minority of Senators into accepting several, coerced short-cuts in regard to the Senate rules.

      However, these forced short-cuts would now become mandated and set in stone if Harry Reid & Co. get their way.

      Under one new “compromise” being floated on Capitol Hill, the Senate would change its rules so that it could pass a gun ban with only 50 votes (plus the vote of Vice President Joe Biden). Or legislators could write the gun ban in a House-Senate conference committee on a “must-pass” bill, employing a tactic that is

      Report this comment

      mercenary4freedom  
    • mercenary4freedom
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 10:20pm

      Under one new “compromise” being floated on Capitol Hill, the Senate would change its rules so that it could pass a gun ban with only 50 votes (plus the vote of Vice President Joe Biden). Or legislators could write the gun ban in a House-Senate conference committee on a “must-pass” bill, employing a tactic that is frequently used to pass controversial legislation. Democrats like West Virginia’s Joe Manchin, Nevada’s Harry Reid, and Pennsylvania’s Bob Casey — who will not have to run for reelection for a while — will cast “courageous” votes for this gun ban.

      And it will hit the House with enormous momentum — momentum which House Speaker John Boehner (who has already called for a dialogue on gun control) may not have the courage to resist.

      But the first step will be to demolish the Senate rules so that gun control only requires 50 votes — or so that gun control can be inserted in a House-Senate conference report on a must-pass bill. And this is where John McCain comes in.

      GOA working with Senator Rand Paul to preserve the filibuster

      McCain was irritated at Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, who worked with Gun Owners of America on a variety of pro-gun issues that slowed down his defense funding bill. So McCain would not lose any sleep if his rules “compromise” diminished our ability to kill anti-gun legislation in the future.

      McCain is now working with Leftist anti-gun Senator Carl Levin on a series of rules changes to make gun control a lot

      Report this comment

      mercenary4freedom  
    • mercenary4freedom
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 10:22pm

      McCain is now working with Leftist anti-gun Senator Carl Levin on a series of rules changes to make gun control a lot easier to pass.

      The first McCain-Levin rules change would make it impossible to fight — what’s known in Washington as — the “motion to proceed.” Remember ObamaCare? Our last real shot to kill ObamaCare was by filibustering the “motion to proceed” to that anti-gun legislation. Once the motion was adopted, the bill became amendable and Harry Reid could play “let’s-make-a-deal.” So this change would eliminate our last real opportunity to set up a roadblock and keep anti-gun legislation from even being considered.

      The second McCain-Levin rules change would make it easier to add gun control to a bill in conference. Currently, senators can block a House-Senate conference from considering an anti-gun bill. But if the McCain proposals are adopted, a “must-pass” bill could be sent to conference … amended in conference with a draconian gun ban … and then sent back to the House and the Senate on a take-it-or-leave-it basis.

      McCain will try to tell you that that inserting a gun ban into a bill that is sitting in a House-Senate conference would be outside the “scope of conference.” But that would be a lie, because as any Senator knows, “scope of conference” rules are never followed. For example, the Gramm-Rudman spending guidelines were written in conference from the ground up.

      The third McCain-Levin rules change would block an

      Report this comment

      mercenary4freedom  
    • mercenary4freedom
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 10:25pm

      The third McCain-Levin rules change would block any amendments except for those offered by Minority Leader Mitch McConnell or Floor Manager John McCain. All other senators would be left out in the cold.

      This McCain-Levin package must be stopped.

      We are currently working with Senator Rand Paul, who is planning to offer a GOA-originated amendment requiring a two-thirds vote in the Senate before any anti-gun measure can be passed.

      We know. We know. If it were up to us, gun control would not be able to be passed with 100 votes. But we need to propose something which will pass the Senate.

      So we need your help in opposing the McCain package and supporting the Paul amendment.

      ACTION: Demand your Senators that they (1) oppose the McCain-Levin package to make gun control easier to pass, and (2) support the Rand Paul amendment to require a two-thirds vote to enact gun control.

      And lastly, The BLAZE NEEDS TO GIVE US MORE ROOM TO POST.

      Report this comment

      mercenary4freedom  
    • mercenary4freedom
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 11:24pm

      SORRY FOR THE DOUBLE POSTING, this was just some info I felt that anyone not familiar with Larry Pratt and GOA should view. They are working hard to attempt to keep the deceit from our govt in check.

      obama is going to defiantely try to ram this thru, even if he has to do an end sweep and use Executive measures which we all know will be UNCONSTITUTIONAL. They do not care, they’re going to try to do whatever they want. obama & THE FOREIGN BAKERS (the fed & BERNAKE) wants to collapse the economy, collectivize everything seize our assets and our land and they don’t want us with weapons getting in their way. WELL I THINK THEY ARE UNDER ESTIMATING US AS A WHOLE.

      Someone posted the #’s yesterday. There are roughly 900, 000 of them (the agency goons) plus 1.6 million military. There are nearly 100 million plus gunowners in this great land.

      If we give up our guns, obama will start the purge. hewants to be Hugo Chavez.

      Report this comment

      mercenary4freedom  
    • Zipit
      Posted on January 7, 2013 at 12:20pm

      Mercy! Enjoyed reading your book!!!!! Er, books, er…………

      Report this comment

      Zipit  
  • grimmster
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 6:11pm

    OK lady, since you have said that, i now want to buy the swamp land in the sahara desert you offered me…….

    Report this comment

    grimmster  
  • noslave
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 6:09pm

    if they honestly try to take away arms,theres easily over 2 million of gun owners,wait for it?,wait for it?just make sure the guns are UNLOADED??

    Report this comment

    noslave  
    • Lt_Scrounge
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 10:54pm

      Actually the numbers are more along the line of 80+ Million gun owners. If only 5% of them refuse to comply, they will outnumber anyone attempting to confiscate their weapons.

      Report this comment

      Lt_Scrounge  
  • SUNTZU
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:55pm

    If you believe in gun control.
    Then you must also believe there is
    no drug or gang problems,both
    have
    been under control for years.

    Report this comment

    SUNTZU  
    • henryKnox
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 6:03pm

      There is also no poverty since we have had a war on poverty for the last 45 years. By the way you would also believe that spoons make people fat.

      Report this comment

      henryKnox  
    • SUNTZU
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 6:09pm

      Hold on I think I know
      They can’t make big money
      off guns,untill control of sales of guns
      has been turned over to the cartels.
      DOJ to Juan; next shipment of coke,add
      in 50 full-auto AK’s and 10’000 rds. ammo
      for each.

      Report this comment

      SUNTZU  
    • SUNTZU
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 6:10pm

      Glad to see your on my side
      HENRY

      Report this comment

      SUNTZU  
    • Daddy Hawg
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 6:37pm

      We should all practice sound gun control, being able to consistently hit what you are aiming at. Anyhting else is a crime.

      Report this comment

      Daddy Hawg  
    • mykidswillbfree
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 6:38pm

      Control is not a new concept for our government.All the problems we are having today are because of complacency with local governments. Our freedom has been taken away and we did nothing time after time over property rights. Now we are losing more and faster all of our other delineated rights.As a calm citizen I find that I must stand for the unthinkable.In order to preserve it for my precious children we MUST begin to plan for a true rebellion.A rebellion against the illegal steps our politicians have taken part in attempting to remove our right to bear arms.It is the final backstop for freedom.Stand with me please.

      Report this comment

      mykidswillbfree  
  • Anonymous T. Irrelevant
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:54pm

    Hmmm, a democrat that makes sense. She needs to change parties before she gets infected by stupid.

    Report this comment

    Anonymous T. Irrelevant  
  • SpankDaMonkey
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:53pm

    .
    She must have fallen, bumped her head and got a Gun Clot…..

    Report this comment

    SpankDaMonkey  
  • marssnw
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:50pm

    Its time for revolution. Nobody wants to hear that, but our country is slowly dwindling away at the hands of the liberal terrorist. It needs to stop now.

    Report this comment

    marssnw  
  • banjarmon
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:46pm

    I need more in put on this, Please

    Is NOT the Constitution the Supreme Law of the land??
    Dose the Constitution supersede All state laws??
    If It dose, Is NOT every gun law written, that INFRINGES ON OUR RIGHTS TO OWN AND BEAR ARMS after the Constitution was written, UNCONSTITUTIONAL??

    Report this comment

    banjarmon  
    • progressiveslayer
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:57pm

      As I’ve said many times every gun law passed since the second amendment is unconstitutional yet congress continues to violate the constitution.

      Report this comment

      progressiveslayer  
    • Joe_The_Patriot
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 6:26pm

      Because the sons of bitches have forgotten the fact THEY WORK FOR US!!!! It’s time we remind them!!! It is OUR constitutional RIGHT to do so… In fact it our responsibility as AMERICANS

      Report this comment

      Joe_The_Patriot  
    • IspytheGov
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 7:38pm

      Well that depends on where you are of the view of incorporation or not, if you are then yes every ton law is unconstitutional and if your view is that the constitution is only applies to the Federal Government then states could pass whatever gun laws they see fit but there could be no federal gun laws .i.e. the 1969 firearm control act.
      This question has not really been addressed by the courts as ruling’s have gone both way in the past, and pose major questions over all types of laws.

      Report this comment

      IspytheGov  
    • glacialhills
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 11:41pm

      I have said it over and over too, Almost all my pro gun friends think having to submit to a background check or get a ccw to carry concealed is legit and in step with the constitution. How people in DC or Chicago justify their draconian laws and subdued their population for this long is beyond me

      I believe it is this way, Our schools have kept kids ignorant of the constitution on purpose,Most adults have no idea what the 2nd even is let alone its meaning, Our legislators know exactly what the meaning is but fawn ignorance and claim otherwise if asked to keep the agenda of a total gun ban moving forward. And They had almost totally gotten away with it ….

      But very recently I have begun to see a glimmer of hope and an awakening within the pro gun world. Hunters actually backing AK and AR shooters and defending target shooters weapons when before they were like “ban them evil black rifles,it does not affect me”. I have also seen a small interest in wanting to at least look into this gun thing by some almost rabid antis. When before they would not even consider talking about a gun …EVER. So there is hope.

      Report this comment

      glacialhills  
  • woodcellar
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:44pm

    We will see. The Dems pored a ton of money into her race to get her the win. She owes them big time. If they need one more vote to win she’ll vote with the Dems.

    Report this comment

    woodcellar  
    • DRSAVAGE24
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 6:28pm

      Bingo, it would be the health care law all over again. If they need her as the deciding vote, she will fall in line.

      My Democratic congressman was endorsed by the frauds at the NRA over a rock solid conservative Republican who would have fought tooth and nail to protect all of the Constitution, not just the 2nd Amendment. Not talking about a RINO republican, yet the NRA saw fit to endorse the Democrat over him. What now? This Democrat is denouncing the NRA and is talking about “common sense” gun laws in light of the Sandy Hook murders.

      Most Republicans cannot be trusted. No Democrat can ever be trusted. And the NRA cannot be trusted. Try a different organization like Gun Owners of America. Their chairman, Larry Pratt, went toe to toe with Piers Morgan shortly after the shootings. Much better organization to stand up for our rights.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avOV6_42xe4

      Report this comment

      DRSAVAGE24  
  • OlefromMN
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:38pm

    The language is being changed in front of our eyes. “Which Democratic Freshman Is Opposing ‘Extreme’ Gun Control? Find Out Here”

    “Democratic”? Really? It should read “Which Democrat Freshman Is Opposing ‘Extreme’ Gun Control? Find Out Here”

    One is a process, the other is a party. C’mon Blaze!!!

    Report this comment

    OlefromMN  
    • civilwarcometh
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:47pm

      After Monday and they ream her a$$. Tuesday she will say she mis-spoke…

      Report this comment

      civilwarcometh  
    • barber2
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 6:38pm

      CIVIL: Remember Feinstein ? She did the same..think it was over Fast and Furious. The Chicago radicals are a thin-skinned, nasty group .

      Report this comment

      barber2  
    • civilwarcometh
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 7:23pm

      Who can forget as i like to call her The Bride of Frankenstien. Yeah i remember. How many time’s have we heard them do it? I can’t even count them anymore.

      Report this comment

      civilwarcometh  
  • nesmond
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:34pm

    It’s a trap!

    Report this comment

    nesmond  
  • TIMEBOMB
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:33pm

    Oh Heidi it’s a new day here in my America and your views simply won’t do,no as your magnificent ruler I have to tell you that I am determined to disarm my idiots I mean loyal subjects. The law is what I say it is,I’ve written many EO’s to exert my authority over my serfs and I’m not about to let some hayseed upstart senator derail my plan for a total gun ban. It has to be this way and it will be since I have decreed it so. Praise be to me BHO.

    Report this comment

    TIMEBOMB  
  • Tri-ox
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:33pm

    Heitkamp cannot (and should not) be trusted – she is a democrat, which means that her party comes before the people she has sworn to serve – and ultimately, she will do as she is told by her ‘lord and savior’. If she persists in speaking truth and logic, she will be shunned and punished by the democrat party – obama’s broad-spectrum gun-grab will be launched within days, and soon enough, Heitkamp will no doubt change her tune.

    Report this comment

    Tri-ox  
  • Seymour
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:30pm

    You know Ms. Heitkamp; you’re going to be run out on a rail by your colleagues. Just sayin…..and your quite right, Feinstein nor Obama will change current gun law as it’s a non sequitur.

    Report this comment

    Seymour  
    • CatB
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:33pm

      Better to stand with principals .. and be run out by tyrants.

      Report this comment

      CatB  
    • civilwarcometh
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:37pm

      Certain stores will get back door deal’s not to sell certain guns/ammo ect. The ATF will just re-classify what certain weopons are so you can’t buy them anymore. This will all be done without congress MARK MY WORD this will happen.

      Report this comment

      civilwarcometh  
    • CatB
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:37pm

      Now how did it do that .. I thought you could not post duplicate posts .. and I only hit Reply once. … Spooky.

      Report this comment

      CatB  
    • TSUNAMI_22
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:41pm

      I’d rather stand on the tyrants………and run on principles. ;-)

      Report this comment

      TSUNAMI_22  
  • BlackCrow
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:28pm

    That is because she knows the good citizens of North Dakota would throw her out of office at the first opportunity then throw her to the wolves when she got back home.

    Report this comment

    BlackCrow  
    • Tri-ox
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:44pm

      I’m afraid that ‘good citizens’ and ‘voting democrat’ are mutually exclusive. Heitkamp is a democrat, which, to any ‘good citizen’ should have been enough reason not to vote for her – especially with obama in the White House. She supports the democrat party and obama – she cannot be trusted.

      Report this comment

      Tri-ox  
  • The-Monk
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:27pm

    I guess she didn’t get the memo that the Dem’s have shifted out of “nudge mode”…..

    Report this comment

    The-Monk  
    • RJJinGadsden
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:35pm

      Hi MONK, I tend to believe that was for her constituents’ consumption. Just wait and watch for her voting record to become known.

      Report this comment

      RJJinGadsden  
    • Gregb
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:38pm

      yep, dems are in “control mode” even thought she is right, I am just curious to see what repercussions she gets from her party

      Report this comment

      Gregb  
    • gyro
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:39pm

      she has not been assimuated yet
      give her a week

      Report this comment

      gyro  
    • TIMEBOMB
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:45pm

      As Heidi’s master I can assure you dear loyal subject that she will get the memo when she’s in my presence and I’ll explain to her in no uncertain terms that I’m going to have an outright ban on guns in my new America. Praise be to me BHO. I know you must feel shaken that I’ve taken the time to address you so please don’t faint I’m going to need all the able bodies my regime can round up for my concentration camps.You’ll have a sense of peace knowing you’re working hard for me and my beard and two illegitimate kids. Praise be to me BHO.

      Report this comment

      TIMEBOMB  
    • barber2
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 6:43pm

      GYRO: Yes. The ” character assassination” we have become so familiar with our Chicago radicals ! There will be some big, bad secret which the MSM will run on her front page of the lefty NYT ! …IF she doesn’t shut up . The Chicago radicals use the media to keep EVERYONE in line ! Leaks ! ( but they also prosecute ex-CIA people for leaking !? Hypocrisy is not a problem when you have the media in your pocket ! ) Our radicals follow those Rules For Radicals’ ethics….which is NONE except ” winning ” and pushing that Lefty agenda !

      Report this comment

      barber2  
  • fixer
    Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:20pm

    wow…a sane democrat!

    Report this comment

    fixer  
    • scarydave
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:33pm

      Amazing ain’ it?
      ———————-
      I think 2013 will be the year that people get smart and organize for any number of bad outcomes due to the policies of Obama’s Marxist administration and our idiot Reps in Congress. My suggestions… Join or start a local Militia. Do NOT allow our government to take away ANY of our 2nd Amendment rights, by any means necessary. Buy lot’s of ammo or better yet learn to make your own and buy a lot of the supplies you will need to do it with. Learn to Barter more. And finally… make this the year that you swear to leave the USA better for your offspring than what we were given by our parents. It is after-all an unwritten American rule and always has been, so it has become our patriotic duty!
      However it will take a lot of people doing some extraordinary things in 2013 so we can start to take back the Country we all dearly love.
      Also… We need a dynamic Leader to emerge before we can become a real movement (it’s just the way it is so don’t ask me why. It just is). Please know that some of us are NOT waiting for a Leader to magically appear. Instead we are presently actively looking for that leader. Pray for us.

      Report this comment

      scarydave  
    • CatB
      Posted on January 6, 2013 at 5:35pm

      For how long??? Insanity seems to spread throughout the Dems like the plague.

      Report this comment

      CatB  
1 2

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Glenn Beck Radio

Listen to Glenn Beck 24/7 Listen Now
Restoring Love