Oil Tanker Strikes San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge

Coast Guard investigating a tanker that scraped one of the towers of the Bay Bridge Monday morning, January 7th, 2013. (KGO Photo)
SAN FRANCISCO (TheBlaze/AP) — An empty oil tanker caused minor damage Monday when it struck a tower in the middle of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge while navigating beneath the hulking span, officials said.
The 752-foot Overseas Reymar from the Marshall Islands rammed the tower about 11:20 a.m. as it headed out to sea, according to the Coast Guard and state transportation officials. The impact didn’t affect traffic on the busy bridge – the main artery between San Francisco and Oakland, Ney said.
The parent company that owns the ship, OSG Ship Management Inc., said the accident occurred as the vessel hit an underwater portion of the massive bridge structure.

Coast Guard investigating a tanker that scraped one of the towers of the Bay Bridge Monday morning, January 7th, 2013. (KGO Photo)
Investigators late Monday had not determined the cause of the crash.
“There’s always the human factor,” Coast Guard Lt. Cmdr. Shawn Lansing said. “That is again what we’ll look into and see whether, in fact, it was a human error or something else and take that into consideration in the development of future regulation.”
Visibility at the time of the collision was about a quarter-mile, but officials didn’t say if that was a factor.
There was no timetable for completing the investigation, Lansing said. The crew and captain of the ship will undergo drug and alcohol testing, per federal regulations. Inspectors also will examine the hull of the ship above and below water, Lansing said.

Coast Guard investigating a tanker that scraped one of the towers of the Bay Bridge Monday morning, January 7th, 2013. (KGO Photo)
The mishap damaged about 30 to 40 feet of fender of steel and wooden timbers built onto the span to absorb the brunt of a ship’s collision, said California Department of Transportation spokesman Bart Ney.
The incident brought back memories of a major crash in 2007 that spilled 53,000 gallons of oil into the bay. Oil leaking from the Cosco Busan contaminated 26 miles of shoreline, killed more than 2,500 birds and delayed the start of the crab-fishing season.
The Overseas Reymar was not carrying oil as cargo on Monday, only fuel to power its engines, said Charlie Goodyear, a spokesman for the San Francisco Bar Pilots Association.
Coast Guard authorities said no oil or hazardous materials were reported to have leaked into the water. Still, officials spread 4,000 feet of absorbent material on the water to be safe.

Coast Guard investigating a tanker that scraped one of the towers of the Bay Bridge Monday morning, January 7th, 2013. (KGO Photo)
No crew members on the ship were injured, and its hull appeared to suffer some scrapes and minor indentations but was not breached, Goodyear added.
“There’s all kinds of speculation as to whether the ship had been pushed into the fender by a strong tide, rather than a head-on collision,” Goodyear said. “In comparing this to 2007, this appears to be a much lesser impact.”
The crew of the Overseas Reymar reported no loss of steering or propulsion, and initial investigations showed no water leaks from any of the ballast tanks, said Darrell Wilson, a spokesman for OSG.
“The ship’s crew safely anchored the vessel and made all proper notifications to the authorities.” Wilson said.
California Emergency Management Agency spokesman Jordan Scott said the superstructure of the bridge was fine.
“There is some damage to the vessel, but nothing that poses a danger to anybody,” Scott said. “A fire boat is out there to make sure it stays that way, and it should.”

Coast Guard investigating a tanker that scraped one of the towers of the Bay Bridge Monday morning, January 7th, 2013. (KGO Photo)
The tower of the bridge appeared to be fine from a distance, added California Department of Transportation spokesman Bart Ney.
The tanker docked west of Yerba Buena Island immediately following the crash, and the pilot was being interviewed by both the Coast Guard and the California Board of Pilot Commissioners for the Bays of San Francisco, San Pablo and Suisun, which regulates bar pilots.
State law requires a bar pilot to guide every large vessel – be it a luxury liner, a billionaire’s yacht, aircraft carrier or cargo ship – in, out and around the San Francisco Bay.
The pilots’ role came under intense scrutiny in the crash of the Cosco Busan.
The ship’s pilot, Capt. John Cota, served a 10-month prison sentence after pleading guilty to two misdemeanor charges.
The companies responsible for the Cosco Busan paid close to $60 million for the cleanup and in criminal fines.
Follow Becket Adams (@BecketAdams) on Twitter
Featured image courtesy KGO Photo. This post has been updated.
In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.
















































































































dmerwin
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 10:08pmWas Hazelwood the captain???
Report this comment
TSUNAMI_22
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 7:49pmMaybe the pilot shouldn’t “text and sail”.
Report this comment
KP74
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 6:11pm1. Vessel is the OVERSEAS REYMAR (not RAYMAR).
2. Vessel is registered in the Marshall Islands but is not from there (Marshall Islands is a USA offshore registry).
3. Vessel is operated by and for Overseas Shipholding Group of NYC.
4. Vessel allided with the bridge support, not collided as some reported (allided is a collision with a fixed object).
5. Vessel is riding light, no cargo aboard to leak.
6. Damage appears minimal, impact due to authorities and publicity appears to be high.
7. Drug test and breath test would be routine for all involved.
8. Most of the bridge crew, as well as the pilot, will be on the beach for a few months and may end up looking for other jobs soon.
All told, that crew is having what is known as a BAD DAY.
Report this comment
SocialistSlayer
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 5:27pmToo bad Pelosi & Feinstein wasn’t on that Bridge
Report this comment
denkat56
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 5:11pmI’ll bet his insurance is going to go up. I wonder what his deductable is.
Report this comment
denkat56
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 5:04pmThis has bush’s finger prints all over it. Its a good thing this didn’t happen in Colorado, they couldn’t do a drug test there.
Report this comment
cessna152
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 4:49pmGosh, even the oil tankers in San Francisco tend to lean left….
Report this comment
1TrueOne55
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 4:42pmYeah they look at things above the water line but what about below the water. Because depending on how it struck the bridge stanchion the damage could be unseen until divers are sent into get a visual on the area struck and still they could have damaged the structure of the cement internally and the cracks are not visible to the naked eye because that jolt could have gone through the concrete like the aftershocks of an earthquake…
Report this comment
NoMoMrNiceGuy
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 4:37pmThas it – BAN The bridges ! They are obviously in the way and dangerous to mankind
Report this comment
82dAirborne
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 5:36pmYou are on the right track BUT if we simply banned water we wouldn’t need nearly as many bridges.
Report this comment
TheBurningTruth
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 7:54pmActually, ban oil from the San Francisco Bay Area. This is the SECOND tanker vs. bridge event in less than 6 years. Clearly there’s a pattern that must be prevented. I’ll bet Pigloski’s constituents will support that if we just label it a “progressive green” action for the general public safety.
Report this comment
19RANDY59
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 10:19pmyou are spot on, look at how many drownings there are every year. I’ve been calling for a ban on water for years. Especially a salt water, LOL. Fill the ocean with beer
Report this comment
Eastinfection
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 4:37pmLooks like this boat has been going in circles in the Bay for the last several hours.
Track it’s GPS movements here:
http://www.marinetraffic.com/ais/default.aspx?mmsi=538002271¢erx=-122.3911¢ery=37.82627&zoom=10&type_color=8
Report this comment
banjarmon
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 4:27pmDarn!!! the River Otter will have to move!!!
Report this comment
Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 4:20pmHEADLINE SAN FRAN:
Vast expanse lubed for big spill, film at eleven.
Report this comment
progressiveslayer
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 4:18pmClearly the banning of all oil tankers and bridges is in order here. The former is a real possibility under the Marxist thug in DC.
Report this comment
Eastinfection
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 4:45pmWithout bridges Californians can’t go both ways.
Report this comment
stopprintn
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 4:17pmSeveny five foot ?
Report this comment
mrunner
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 4:28pmMeans that Coast Guard boat must be about 6 foot huh?
Report this comment
Eastinfection
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 4:32pmi was thinking the same thing.
It’s a 750′ tanker.
Blaze fixed it.
Report this comment
RIGHTHOOK
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 4:17pmChevron headquarters in SF better fortify the area as Code Pink and every other group of freaks will be trying to vandalize the property and those associated with it.
Report this comment
piper60
Posted on January 7, 2013 at 4:14pmTalk about side swiping. I’d bet he gets a really big surcharge on his insurance policy.
Report this comment