Editor’s note: This post contains some strong language that may be offensive to some readers.
–

Credit: AP
The website Gawker has outdone New York’s “Journal News” and published the names of all licensed gun owners in New York City. With the provocative headline, “Here Is a List of All the A**holes Who Own Guns in New York City,” John Cook provides a 446-page list of every licensed gun owner in NYC, obtained two-and-a-half years ago via a Freedom of Information Act request.
“Below is a 446-page list of every licensed gun owner in New York City…Because the NYPD is more interested in raping and/or eating ladies and spying on Muslims than it is in honoring public records law, the list contains only the names, and not the addresses, of the licensees,” Cook writes.
(Scroll down for updates to this story)
The Journal News sparked outrage when it published the names and addresses of pistol permit holders in Westchester and Rockland Counties. The paper wanted to also publish the information of gun owners in Putnam County, N.Y., but so far the county has refused, saying providing the information would put the public in danger.
As Cook correctly points out, section 400.00 of the Penal Law of New York, entitled “Licenses to carry, possess, repair and dispose of firearms,” makes addresses of licensed gun owners public information. “The name and address of any person to whom an application for any license has been granted shall be a public record,” the law states.
Critics argue, however, just because information is publicly available, that doesn’t mean it should be published online and in newspapers for criminals and others to see. In other states, like Texas, the personal information of concealed weapons license holders is considered confidential.
In his post, Cook also brags about outing Fox News chief Roger Ailes, Sean Hannity, Howard Stern, Don Imus, Donald Trump and others as gun owners with permits to own or carry firearms in the city in 2010.
Because New York pistol owners must register with their local police department and the state, the names of 1.2 million New York handgun owners and the addresses of 300,000 of them have been available online for more than two years. Because of this, gun owners in New York should not be upset about the Journal News or other outlets like Gawker publicizing their personal information, according to Cook.
“In any case, it’s clear that many of the Rockland County and Westchester County gun owners who are outraged at having their addresses plastered on the internet have had those addresses plastered on the internet for years without it causing a problem. And if anyone wanted to really stir some sh*t up, they’d grab those Who’s Packing databases and throw them up on Google Maps,” Cook writes.
While the names and addresses of gun owners are considered public information in New York, the media, even websites like Gawker, still have a responsibility to exercise smart editorial judgment and carefully consider the consequences of all of its decisions.
Ex-burglars and thieves recently told Fox News that a database of gun owners is like “gold” for criminals, letting them know which houses are easy targets and which ones have guns to steal. Frank Abignale, the famous former thief portrayed by Leonardo DiCaprio in “Catch Me if You Can,” called the Journal News’ decision to publish gun owners’ information “reprehensible.” Another ex-burglar said the newspaper was “exceptionally stupid” in its actions.
“And for the record,” Cook concluded. “[The gun owners] are not all a**holes. Some of them need guns for legitimate reasons for their jobs, like providing security for a**holes.”
TheBlaze is not providing the 446-page list of all New York City licensed gun owners.
–
UPDATE: Gawker quickly changed its headline, striking through the word “a**holes” and mockingly replacing it with “handsome law-abiding citizens.”
–
Update II: Gawker is now reporting death threats directed at the website over its decision to publish the names of all licensed gun owners in New York City.
About an hour-and-a-half after they published the story, someone apparently called Gawker’s headquarters and said “you’re f**kin dead.” Gawker reports it is “fair to assume this was related to the gun post.”
Another Gawker employee claims to have received a phone call after the story went live, telling her to “look both ways when you leave the building” and “all of you better look both ways because you’re going to get shot.” The same caller also reportedly said “every girl better have a boyfriend because you need someone to protect you.”
Gawker has contacted the police over the threats.
“These violent threats come as reaction to us publishing information that was already publicly available,” the website writes.



























































































































Comments (329)
ResistSocialism
Jan. 8, 2013 at 5:00pmNew York is a dump full of worthless people
Report this comment
CathyvanDyke
Jan. 8, 2013 at 5:00pmHow many liberal NY politician who advocate gun control … liberal NY media hosts who advocate gun control and … NY Hollywood spokespersons who advocate gun control are on that list or should be on that list?
Report this comment
spfoam1
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:57pmThis idiot John Cook is putting Gawkers liberal supporters at much greater risk than the gun owners, so this is almost funny. Now the criminals in NY will have a roadmap to the homes without guns. Liberal on liberal crime will increase as a result. If liberals in NY weren’t so blind and stupid they would be outraged!
Report this comment
lefty5005
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:54pmI’ve had an IRS problem and am going to have another IRS problem next year. Between you and me though I don’t think by this time next year collecting taxes will be of paramount importance. The pimple is growing, it has an ugly head and is about to burst. Abortion, gun rights, economics, LE in schools all these minor glitches will be of no consequence when the SHTF. Abortion clinics will close because the doctor’s and nurses will be at home, if you own a gun you will probably be offered 10x it’s worth by someone from the Gawker or Journal for it because they won’t be able to defend themselves from all the rif raf needing food, money, drugs, alcohol or a place to sleep and the schools will be closed not needing LE to protect the “chillren” as the black folks say. I personally hope everything works out and “we all just need to get along” but only an explosion of violence will right the numerous wrongs throughout society I’m afraid. People, imagine your worse fears and multiply it x5 and you might get close to what is going to happen. Some people are literally praying for anarchy and chaos but it is hard to stop a speeding locomotive whose engineer is the POTUS.
Report this comment
Mil-Dot
Jan. 8, 2013 at 5:42pmUnfortunately for many, the only uniforms that will differentiate the combatants when the SHTF will be skin color, govt loyalties and ideology. That’s it.
Report this comment
ranepowel
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:53pmI love the fact that all you have to do to keep your privacy is give up your guns. I never have to worry about anyone ever finding out my address (not that it’s a big secret, either), because I choose not to be an a-hole with a gun :)
Report this comment
The_Woofster
Jan. 8, 2013 at 5:00pmNo, you’re just a target.
Report this comment
spfoam1
Jan. 8, 2013 at 5:03pmYou must be stupid. Criminals will use the list to see who doesn’t have guns. Addresses without guns are easy targets now. Enjoy your privacy, until a criminal pays you a visit.
Report this comment
hatchetjob
Jan. 8, 2013 at 6:19pmRANE, “because I choose not to be an a-hole with a gun :)”
With no gun, you’re just an a-hole.
Report this comment
DEFCON4
Jan. 8, 2013 at 6:24pm@ Hatchet, That’s a ‘good one’……lol…lol…rimshot..
Report this comment
Pro2A13
Jan. 9, 2013 at 12:35amLike around Springfield MO?
Report this comment
searcher619
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:52pmAll these idiots are doing is telling criminals which houses NOT to rob or do home invasions on. non-gun owners should be pissed because these things paint a nice big target on them.
Report this comment
malbro
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:52pm*******?? Do not,I repeat,do not break down in front of my house seeking help………….
Report this comment
kickagrandma
Jan. 8, 2013 at 5:02pmLIKE your post!
Report this comment
Tom K
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:49pmGawker is completely irresponsible as is the Journal News. Neither have thought through the negative consequences that could follow their ” outing ” of legal gun owners. Stand by for law suites to fly WHEN this information is used to cause loss of property or Death.
Report this comment
THX-1138
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:47pmEvery criminal in New York thanks you for this list. The survivors of the next person killed in New York should sue Gawker, everyone in the State of New York and the Feds for contributing to their loved one’s death by publishing the fact that that person was unarmed, putting them at significant risk of being singled out for robbery based on that information.
This blood, like most, will be on the hands of our “leaders”.
Fed up yet?
Report this comment
frust@ted
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:47pmThey wonder why we don’t want to register our guns, which is a product that you can purchase legally and is protected by the constitution. The only reason they want us to register them is so they can take them when they want them.
These are the same people that scream about the privacy and protecting child rapists, when it comes to publishing the adress of sex offenders.
Report this comment
THX-1138
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:51pmWhen they come for my guns I’ll give ‘em the ammo first. One round at a time.
Report this comment
searcher619
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:54pmWhen criminals know you are armed they will pass you buy in favor or easier marks. MY problem with gun registration is it makes it easier for the government to disarm the public.
Report this comment
ranepowel
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:55pmTHX, reporting your post to authorities as it implies physical violence against law enforcement agents. Keep it up, guys. I’ve got six official, personal responses from Federal agents saying they are investigating the claims made by some people on this board that they are a.) hiding illegal guns, b.) withholding taxes.
<3 you all!
Report this comment
searcher619
Jan. 8, 2013 at 5:13pmranepowel:
Yeah riiight…. your are pathetic specimen. You have nothing better to do than troll the Blaze.
Report this comment
hatchetjob
Jan. 8, 2013 at 6:25pmRANE, I’m so scared…. yawn….. zzzzzzz……
Report this comment
jungle J
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:46pmgots to sue gawkers and tie up day money.
Report this comment
thegreatcarnac
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:45pmI will gladly give them my address. Yes..I have guns and I am good with the one’s I have. If you burglarize my home when I am not there you will get caught and you will not find all the guns. There is no shame in owning guns. It is a right and an honor. It means you wish to protect your family and your country. The people without guns are the idiots. They cannot protect anyone and they are sitting ducks for crime and midnight visits from their government. They are cowards and no men. Reverse this thinking. They believe they are shaming people for having guns. It is the opposite. They are showing what idiot cowards refuse to protect their families.
Report this comment
Jsor2112
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:42pmWhat a woderful tool for criminals to use to see who DOESN’T own a gun …. they are much easier targets.
Report this comment
Just_Us2
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:42pmThis is where he works
Headquarters
210 Elizabeth St 4th FL New York, NY 10012 United States
Report this comment
barber2
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:42pmThe name of that rag , Gawker, says it all. Hope someone figures out a way ” to use the system ” to sue them over their intimidating, invasive, gawking , sleazy tactics .
Report this comment
BlackCrow
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:40pmNew York is a cesspool and we know what floats around in a cesspool. The very idea of requiring permission of the government (license) to exercise a FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT is repugnant to the Constitution and basic human LIBERTY!
Report this comment
burnteye86
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:37pmIf you’re not on this list, you’re a target
Report this comment
ranepowel
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:57pmThat’s blatant lies, and fear mongering won’t work on the rest of us law-abiding citizens who choose not to put tin foil on our heads and pretend ‘the big bag communists’ are coming for us.
Try smoking some marijuana sometime and relaxing.
Report this comment
searcher619
Jan. 8, 2013 at 5:11pmranepowel:
WTF are you babbling about? If you aren’t on that list it means you likely don’t own a gun and are likely an easy mark. Pull your head out of your trolling arse.
Report this comment
CathyvanDyke
Jan. 8, 2013 at 5:14pmIf you are on the posted registry list … there is no doubt that the Administration knows where to go in its mission of confiscation if and when gun control is implemented.
Ronald Reagan – 40th President of the USA (1981-1989)
“There are those in America today who have come to depend absolutely on government for their security. And when government fails they seek to rectify that failure in the form of granting government more power. So, as government has failed to control crime and violence with the means given it by the Constitution, they seek to give it more power at the expense of the Constitution. But in doing so, in their willingness to give up their arms in the name of safety, they are really giving up their protection from what has always been the chief source of despotism — GOVERNMENT!
Report this comment
CathyvanDyke
Jan. 8, 2013 at 5:22pmJanuary 08, 2013
Democrat on Semi-Automatics: ‘I Think We Need to Start Taking Them’
http://nation.foxnews.com/gun-control/2013/01/08/democrat-semi-automatics-i-think-we-need-start-taking-them?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+FoxNation+(Fox+Nation)
Report this comment
Friar-3Michael
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:37pmTop down – Bottom up.
Report this comment
barber2
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:36pmIsn’t it amazing that there is now so little respect for an individual’s right to privacy in the MSM ( despite the endless paper forms for HIPPA and all ?! ), and yet no one has been able to ferret out Obama’s school records. Guess he’s just ” special.” ( and is being shielded by even more ” special” people )
Report this comment
Mil-Dot
Jan. 8, 2013 at 5:46pmSaid it before and I will say it again. When the war starts, all MSM goons are legitimate targets. In any war, spies and propagandist are most sought after. Do not give them any quarter whatsoever.
Report this comment
YOURSENSEI
Jan. 8, 2013 at 7:09pmThis is what you must know:
The “right to privacy” is arbitrary, depending on whose privacy is at risk.
It is so.
Report this comment
gyro
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:36pmyou should not put private inforation in forums
Report this comment
THX-1138
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:48pmOh the Irony!
Report this comment
ThoreauHD
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:35pmGovernment registration and stupidity made this list possible.
Report this comment
SidneyDave
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:35pmWhen will they be fair and publish a list of those that have unlicensed guns in NYC? Those are the people I would be worried about.
Report this comment
mrunner
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:35pmThe New York City Metro area will become our test implosion. They raised income taxes on the wealthy, the wealthy started leaving. They have highly restrictive gun laws and are demonizing the law abiding gun owners- I am sure some will start to leave. They will continue to alienate patriots and success until they are left with nothing but degenerates. Tax base will crumble and it will turn to an open sewer. I give it 20 years.
Report this comment
barber2
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:43pmThe next Detroit ?
Report this comment
TotallyNotATroll
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:34pmAt least they never show bias by doing anything obvious, like naming their list ‘*(&*&^^* who own guns’ or anything. Liberals are so hard to spot.
Report this comment
barber2
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:46pmYes. Their arrogance shines like a spotlight .
Report this comment
Lion420
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:33pmThis is what we’re up against. Children. Spoiled rotten children. They expect the government to take care of them, and give them gifts, while the adults are a-holes. Daddy took my toys away when I lied to him and stole money from Mommy’s purse. I’m gonna smash his a-hole face in.
Report this comment
barber2
Jan. 8, 2013 at 4:47pmSounds like a description of some of the angry, crazy males who have made such horrific headlines in recent years.
Report this comment