Death Toll Revised Down to 24 After Monstrous Oklahoma Tornado…100+ Injured…Children Among the Dead…Stunning Pictures…Woman Finds Dog During Interview!

WATCH on TheBlaze TV: Latest Updates on Tornado Aftermath, Including Updates From Glenn Beck in Oklahoma

Crime

Judge Rules Army Private in WikiLeaks Case Was Illegally Punished

Jan. 8, 2013 7:45pm Jason Howerton

Judge Rules Army Private Bradley Manning in WikiLeaks Case Was Illegally Punished

WASHINGTON, DC – JANUARY 08: Pfc. Bradley E. Manning is escorted from a hearing, on January 8, 2013 in Fort Meade, Maryland. Manning attended a motion hearing in the case of United States vs. Pfc. Bradley E. Manning, who is charged with aiding the enemy and wrongfully causing intelligence to be published on the internet. He is accused of sending hundreds of thousands of classified Iraq and Afghanistan war logs and more than 250,000 diplomatic cables to the website WikiLeaks while he was working as an intelligence analyst in Baghdad in 2009 and 2010. Credit: Getty Images

FORT MEADE, Md. (AP) — An Army private suspected of sending reams of classified documents to the secret-sharing WikiLeaks website was illegally punished at a Marine Corps brig and should get 112 days cut from any prison sentence he receives if convicted, a military judge ruled Tuesday.

Army Col. Denise Lind ruled during a pretrial hearing that authorities went too far in their strict confinement of Pfc. Bradley Manning for nine months in a Marine Corps brig in Quantico, Va., in 2010 and 2011. Manning was confined to a windowless cell 23 hours a day, sometimes with no clothing. Brig officials said it was to keep him from hurting himself or others.

Lind said Manning’s confinement was “more rigorous than necessary.” She added that the conditions “became excessive in relation to legitimate government interests.”

Manning faces 22 charges, including aiding the enemy, which carries a maximum sentence of life behind bars. His trial begins March 6.

The 25-year-old intelligence analyst had sought to have the charges thrown out, arguing the conditions were egregious. Military prosecutors had recommended a seven-day sentence reduction, conceding Manning was improperly kept for that length of time on highly restrictive suicide watch, contrary to a psychiatrist’s recommendation.

FILE – In this June 25, 2012 file photo, Army Pfc. Bradley Manning is escorted out of a courthouse in Fort Meade, Md., after a pretrial hearing. A military judge hears closing arguments on Tuesday, Dec. 12, 2012, on whether Manning who is charged with sending classified material to WikiLeaks, suffered illegal pretrial punishment during nine months in a Marine Corps brig. Army Pfc. Bradley Manning s lawyers claim his treatment was so egregious that all charges should be dismissed. Credit: AP

Lind rejected a defense contention that brig commanders were influenced by higher-ranking Marine Corps officials at Quantico or the Pentagon.

Manning showed no reaction as Lind read her decision. He fidgeted when the judge took the bench to announce her ruling, sometimes tapping his chin or mouth with a pen and frequently glancing at his attorney’s notepad, but those movements tapered off during the hour and 45 minutes it took the judge to read the lengthy opinion.

Mike McKee, one of about a dozen Manning supporters in the courtroom, said he was disappointed. He called the ruling “very conservative,” although he said he didn’t expect the charges to be thrown out.

“I don’t find it a victory,” McKee said. “Credit like that becomes much less valuable if the sentence turns out to be 80 years.”

Jeff Paterson of the Bradley Manning Support Network, which is funding Manning’s defense, said the sentencing credit “doesn’t come close to compensating Bradley” for his harsh treatment.

“The ruling is not strong enough to give the military pause before mistreating the next American soldier awaiting trial,” Paterson wrote in an email.

Lind ruled on the first day of a scheduled four-day hearing at Fort Meade, near Baltimore.

The hearing is partly to determine whether Manning’s motivation matters. Prosecutors want the judge to bar the defense from producing evidence at trial regarding his motive for allegedly leaking hundreds of thousands of secret war logs and diplomatic cables. They say motive is irrelevant to whether he leaked intelligence, knowing it would be seen by al-Qaida

Manning allegedly told an online confidant-turned-informant that he leaked the material because “I want people to see the truth” and “information should be free.”

Defense attorney David Coombs said Tuesday that barring such evidence would cripple the defense’s ability to argue that Manning leaked only information that he believed couldn’t hurt the United States or help a foreign nation.

Manning has offered to take responsibility for the leaks in a pending plea offer but he still could face trial on charges such as aiding the enemy.

The Crescent, Okla., native is accused of leaking classified Iraq and Afghanistan war logs and more than 250,000 diplomatic cables while working as an intelligence analyst in Baghdad in 2009 and 2010. He is also charged with leaking 2007 video of a U.S. helicopter crew gunning down 11 men, including a Reuters news photographer and his driver. The Pentagon concluded the troops acted appropriately, having mistaken the camera equipment for weapons.

Manning supporters consider him a whistleblower whose actions exposed war crimes and helped trigger the pro-democracy Arab Spring uprisings in late 2010.

Featured image via Getty

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (85)

watashbuddyfriend
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 11:50pm
Thanks Army Col. Denise Lind for standing up for Pfc. Bradley E. Manning! At least he exposed some of the goings-on in the Fed Govt (House, Senate, and Administration), for HOW MANY years, now?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- The_Jerk
  Posted on January 9, 2013 at 2:04am
  Army Col. Denise Lind another example of why women shouldn’t serve.
  
  Report this comment
- rangerskippy
  Posted on January 9, 2013 at 7:58am
  The left loves this guy because he is a degenerate sodomite.
  
  Homosexuals are like a cancer in our military. They are only 2.5% of the population, but have 64% of the nation’s syphilis, they made up 57% of new HIV cases last year in the US, they commit 1/3 of the nation’s child molestations.
  
  In the military, they detract from discipline, spread disease, and they are a self centered bunch.
  
  Some like to boast that the Baron Von Stuben who wrote our book for drill and ceremony during the Revolution was gay. What they do not tell you, is that he was run out of Prussia for raping two boys in a military school under his command.
  
  He gave away military secrets during a time of war. He is typical of the gay crowd, in that his evil sexual perversion is more important to him, than supporting and defending the Constitution, or fighting for the American solider to his left and his right.
  
  Report this comment
- xevnoc
  Posted on January 9, 2013 at 8:50am
  How did he betray his oath to defend the Constitution?
  
  P.S., funny how everyone seems to be a Ranger nowadays…
  
  Report this comment
- rangerskippy
  Posted on January 9, 2013 at 9:55am
  @xevnoc
  
  PFC Bradley Manning is not a Ranger, he is an intel MOS
  
  Report this comment
- Hcall
  Posted on January 9, 2013 at 5:05pm
  Is that a girl?
  
  Report this comment
NoUseForLogic
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 10:40pm
Why don’t you idiots put 9/11 under this much scrutiny? I swear, Obama comes along and EVERYTHING he does is a conspiracy. Can’t you guys see you’re being utterly lied to on a daily basis? Everything Barack Obama does is not an evil conspiracy. Get a grip teabaggers.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- justangry
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 11:19pm
  Um like women and children with drones every day, a secret kill list, classifying veterans as suspected terrorists, taking away our right to a trial, renewing the desecration of our right to privacy, and destroying our rights to peacefully assemble and protest? Yeah he’s a swell guy.
  
  Report this comment
neverending
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 10:39pm
Don’t know which is worse the obama administration or these freakin courts – can hardly wait for the sorry sob to stack the supreme court and pretty good chance he is going to have the opportunity to do that and that will be the final screwing of the American people.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
NoUseForLogic
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 10:33pm
As you guys blabber on and on about transparency, then applaud the imprisonment of a U.S. soldier who made war more transparent. Odd indeed.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
justangry
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 10:14pm
Wow statism runs deep on the Blaze. So all an obvious MARXIST running the country has to do is wave old glory and you’d side with him? I just don’t understand it. Allen West gets kicked out of the service then gets into congress and immediately proceeds to strip us of our rights and he’s great, but Manning exposes the corrupt Marxist for what he really is and you all think he should be shot. I don’t get it.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- WarMunger_Al
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 10:35pm
  When you are entrusted with classified information, you take an oath not to divulge it. He put people at risk because he is an anarchist that wants to see the world burn, his own statement. Anyone who violates their oath with respect to constitution and traitors that give aid and comfort to the enemy should be shot. This idiot kid should have been tossed over the fence and left to the afghani’s, some of whom he had exposed as working with the Americans.
  
  Report this comment
- Hobbs57
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 11:12pm
  I agree, whether you like it or not justangry, such a protcol has to be in place or many innocent lives can be put in danger, not to mention the security of our nation.If you believe he is the hero you portray him as, you must consider he could have taken a number of different routes to bring attention to matters he felt the government was acting upon illegally. The way this idiot did it was out of spite and he knew the consequences going in. He knew he could be shot for such deeds, and if he was on a suicide mission, as it appears he was, then indeed, he should get the justice he desires.
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 11:27pm
  No anything this murdering socialist/fascist sack of crap is doing shouldn’t be a secret. Sorry I don’t trust him and if you’ve read the wikileaks dump yourself you would have more reasons to despise him too.
  
  Report this comment
sbenard
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 9:56pm
How many days will they cut from his sentence if they just throw away the key?

Is treason still a capital offense? If so, then maybe they can leave his little pinkie wriggling on the sidewalk when he’s gone, as compensation for his “mistreatment”!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Fitzzz
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 9:44pm
He is a TRAITOR
put before a firing squad and SHOT

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- banjarmon
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 9:59pm
  Take 112 days off the date before he is Shot or hanged! The sooner the better!!
  
  Report this comment
- Americanius
  Posted on January 9, 2013 at 2:02am
  Agree. The info he leaked most likely has led to punishment far worse than cell confinement or treatment that this SFB moron experienced in the brig.
  
  Report this comment
ares338
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 9:16pm
It doesn’t matter if you think the material doesn’t need to be classified or not…..He sold his country out period. I don’t care if he ever sees the light of day again.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- justangry
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 9:42pm
  No he sold out the Obama administration and other corrupt globalist leaders that have infiltrated and subverted our once great nation.
  
  Report this comment
- Kumo
  Posted on January 9, 2013 at 3:45am
  Who cares about Obama? PFC Manning is a traitor to the uniform and his fellow servicemen, most of which secretly do not like Obama and his policies. Both Manning and Maj. Hassan (Ft Hood shooter) should be taken off the Military payroll (yes, these two are STILL getting a bi-monthly paycheck!) and executed for acts of treason.
  
  Report this comment
freedomisasfreedomdoes
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 9:14pm
what? crazyland

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
barber2
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:57pm
I used to believe in that old adage ” lose lips sink ships ” but that was before the Media Controlling Masters of the Far Left Obama administration. Now I’d like to lock up Manning with all of the Obama radicals. Let them entertain one another and protect us law abiding, tax paying citizens from ALL of these anti- traditional American values types . Book ‘em Dano…. and throw away the key.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- justangry
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 9:56pm
  You do realize he blew the whistle on the Obama administration, don’t you?
  
  Report this comment
- NoUseForLogic
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 10:29pm
  No, he blew the whistle on the Military Industrial Complex. He brought the reality of a fake war to the media, helping to end torture and the wars sooner. Obama didn’t torture. He blew the whistle on the Bush administration.
  
  Report this comment
- WarMunger_Al
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 10:38pm
  he blew the whistle on his brothers and sisters in arms. He violated his oath and should pay the penalty. He put people at risk, not to right any wrongs, but for the fun of it.
  
  Report this comment
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on January 10, 2013 at 12:54am
  So… you’re saying we *shouldn’t* know what our guys are up to overseas?
  
  Even when what they’re up to is wrong, and downright savage and perverse, in some instances?
  
  Is that because, if you know about it, you’re on the hook for it? But if you’re ignorant of it, you’re not to blame?
  
  Report this comment
SpankDaMonkey
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:40pm
.
Been a long day I thought we needed a joke……

Boudreaux went to Thibadeaux’s house but he was gone. Marie, his wife said he was out hunting & fishing. Boudreaux said he would come back later, Marie said to wait a minute she had something to show him. She brought out a big box full of animal penises about 500. Boudreaux “Cher what you going to did wit dat? Marie said ‘I don’t know. Boudreaux thought for a minute said give me the box and I’ll be back.

Several weeks went by, Marie was home when Boudreaux came looking for Thibadeaux. Again he was not home, as he turned to leave Marie axed him “Boudreaux what you did wit dat box I gave you? Boudreaux said “Cher I almost forgot”. He reached into his pocket and pulled out a little pouch about the size of a deck of cards.

BOUDREAUX! Dat box was full; dis is all I get a little tinny bag?

Boudreaux said “Clam down Cher, You rub it just right, and it turns into a Suitcase…..

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
DougHuffman
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:40pm
Manning is a fine foil, knife-like, in the Assange-Wikileaks case. Manning is culpable, Assange likely not. This eVil arch-conservative has learned much from Assange-Wikileaks, and I am impressed by their involvement in the Steubenville gang-rape. Manning is a traitor and a fool.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
bTeri
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:40pm
OK great — Lets deduct the 112 days from the sentence Manning is given for each count of treason for each piece of information he leaked (there are thousands and thousands at minimum) and then lets add each count as an accessory to murder for all the people that died as a result of the information he leaked about secret sources and agents. I figure Manning will need to live to be about 10,563 years old to complete his sentence.

And shame on all those that are acting as if Manning is a victim because they like the fact that he outed information about a war they didnt believe in — he still committed treason — the highest crime there is – and he committed it THOUSANDS of times.. Manning is a disgrace as as far as I am concerned life in prison is a waste of my tax dollars and allowing him to continue to breathe is a waste of air.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
chips1
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:39pm
Do the leaks have to be sent a certain way to be illegal or can you send the info thru your White House Blackberry?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Thighmaster
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:30pm
And yet they just can’t seem to give enough rights to the Ft Hood shooter. Oh that’s right, he’s a muslim…

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- let us prey
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:38pm
  It is despicable.
  
  Report this comment
- barber2
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 9:10pm
  THIGH: And not to mention that the only suspect in the Benghazi attack ( despite that they had VIDEO of the attackers ?! ), has been released for lack of evidence. And the FBI and State Department and Hillary ,with her boo-boo, all have ” no comment ?” Four Americans died there. Apparently American citizens have been marginalized and our radicals in the White House don’t give a rat’s @ss. Unbelievable. This Obama crew is NOT the greatest generation. They are the new and ” changed ” Americans. Define them as you will…
  
  Report this comment
deb7505
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:30pm
Back in my day he would have been killed.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- justangry
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 9:58pm
  Were globalist Marxists running this country back in your day, pops?
  
  Report this comment
- WarMunger_Al
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 10:43pm
  Angry-
  actually that is the way it was done since the beginning of our nation. Benedict arnold ring a bell? He once was a hero, then he became a traitor and they hung him for it. When your neighbor sells you out to the FBI in the incoming insurrection, you just might understand the feeling.
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on January 9, 2013 at 9:59am
  Warmunger, I’m apparently being censored by the Blaze now. My only point is check the original sources and I’ve never said he shouldn’t be punished at all for handling it the wrong way. I just don’t think he should be shot or spend the rest of his life in prison.
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on January 9, 2013 at 4:41pm
  Angry
  I am again confused by a Bot…Since when did bots go all global? Thought the ganga induced mantra was not out problem, stop policing the world, not our problem, blah blah pass the bong, not our problem. What gives with the new global NWO conspiracy poo?
  
  Report this comment
chips1
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:29pm
Does that mean that when he is convicted and gets life imprisonment, he gets 112 days back? In that case, when he dies, he can’t be burried for the next 112 days and he is going to smell pretty bad.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
toiletclogga
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:25pm
I believe that I may be one of the few people who feels sorry for this young man. I feel this way because I believe he is a product of a liberal upbringing, and I believe his sole purpose of entering military service was to do something like this with the belief that others would consider him heroic and come to his aid. It may still happen, but we’ll have to wait until he is sentenced. This kid was brainwashed into doing this. Watch for the Liberals to come out in force for this guy. I was in the intelligence field, and worked at Ft. Meade/NSA in the late 80′s. Everybody who works in intelligence knows the ramifications of security breach, particularly Top Secret caveat codeword information which is highly sensitive. Back then, most of the military was hard core Conservative. Maybe things have changed.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
TADTAD
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:17pm
It’s a shame, I tell you. A damn shame. There’s billions of people who’d love to be locked up in that brig which provides shelter, temperature control, clean, purified water and hot meals requiring little to no work for exchange of such security. Sure, give the little punk his extra 112 days. Oh, are we compromising again? Fine. 113.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
FISH_BONE
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 7:58pm
Toss him in a cell with Jerry Sandusky.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Stelex
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 7:57pm
He’s all about exposing things………an now he’s got a problem with nudity. He should be paraded in the nude for all to see. Just like the information he released.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
justangry
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 7:57pm
Go out and read what he dumped on Wikileaks people before you decide who should be in jail.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Stelex
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:06pm
  Just……..the point is he sold out. There’s a better way to handle this stuff. You just don’t throw it out on the internet for all to see. Without knowing all the facts, he has know idea of the consequences of the info
  
  Report this comment
- FISH_BONE
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:08pm
  It doesn’t matter what he delivered. Its not his call to expose any “classified information”. Period.
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:15pm
  What info? I’ve been through the dump and there wasn’t anything in there that should have been classified to begin with. There was a time when all that stuff was beamed into everyone’s living rooms. Now the administration doesn’t want people to know that our RoE’s aren’t as noble as what they thought. This is nothing more than punishing a whistle blower. I mean if you’ve found something on there that put our boys in harm’s way, link it. Otherwise, you’re not going to change my mind.
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:21pm
  Angry has ruled, and we all need to talk a step back as Angry UMCJ is what it is. Oh, wait, they aren’t operating under Angry UMCJ? Well why the hell not? Angry rules.
  
  Report this comment
- tnman65
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:33pm
  I’m with you fish.
  
  Report this comment
- Walkabout
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 9:07pm
  Angry has ruled. “None finer” than Angry.
  
  Report this comment
- barber2
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 9:16pm
  FISH: Young Manning is just another one of those ” smartest guys in mom’s basement.” So many weird young people who were raised by idiots who should never have have inflicted their moral vacuity upon a developing human. ” Lose parents sink functional societies .”
  
  Report this comment
- Walkabout
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 9:16pm
  “The naming of mainland China residents reportedly “sparked an online witch-hunt by Chinese nationalist groups, with some advocating violence against those now known to have met with U.S. Embassy staff.”
  
  - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_diplomatic_cables_leak
  
  ***
  
  “Go out and read what he dumped on Wikileaks people before you decide who should be in jail.”
  - Just Angry
  
  ***
  
  Apparently Angry is good with this.
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 9:19pm
  None finer? Walkabout, are you on team Obama and Clinton? That’s who Bradley Manning exposed.
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 9:22pm
  Walkabout, I challenged you to check primary sources and you go to Wikipedia? What a ******.
  
  Report this comment
- Walkabout
  Posted on January 9, 2013 at 9:20am
  Angry
  Are you denying wiki’s summary in this case is wrong?
  
  ““The naming of mainland China residents reportedly “sparked an online witch-hunt by Chinese nationalist groups, with some advocating violence against those now known to have met with U.S. Embassy staff.””
  
  I do treat wikipedia’s entries with some skepticism, moreso every year. I especially have done so after reviewing a couple of edit pages & saw activists repeatedly trying to rewrite stuff.
  
  But I ask you on this is that particular summary accurate? If it is then, what Manning did was above his paygrade & put people in harm’s way.
  ***
  I also read where some jihadis apparently were trying to surrender to a helicopter & were fired upon. I know every troll here ( I don’t regard you as a troll) will lambaste the pilots. But I know surrender is a tricky business. It has been used as a subterfuge in many cases. Outside of any conflict I have told my boys that if they are ever on the short end that surrendering in the battle is dangerous, when people’s blood is up, when other have used surrender as a ruse, & surrendering larger groups is less dangerous then surrendering in small groups (generally). So I will take these Monday morning quaterbacks with a grain of salt the size of a planet killing asteroid. & this from someone who despises pilots. You are either one, worked with them or pretending to be one.
  
  Report this comment
Advection
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 7:56pm
If he downloaded tens of thousands of top secret data files then transferred them to wikileaks so they could make them public, then he’s guilty of treason.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
kickagrandma
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 7:51pm
If they want “aiding the enemy” charges, “they” should start with our current administration and those who have left it to HIDE. Ain’t happen’ bros. GOD KNOWS AND HE IS NOT MOCKED, your arrogant bs.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
IndyGuy
Posted on January 8, 2013 at 7:49pm
“112 days cut from any prison sentence he receives if convicted,”….O.K…..so make that 150 years minus 112 days…seems fair to me…

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- mrunner
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 7:59pm
  I dunno, life in prison minus 112 days seems reasonable to me. Soon as he dies, we will know we accidently released him 112 days late…
  
  Report this comment
- RJJinGadsden
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:00pm
  Agreed!
  
  Report this comment
- BODYBAG
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:00pm
  Ditto.
  Life – 112 days = You’re still so F’ed
  
  In an earlier era when this world still had people with b@lls they would
  have sent him to a firing squad.
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:00pm
  Without relying on the media’s narrative, what exactly did he dump on Wikileaks that would warrant such a harsh punishment? I bet you can’t tell me despite all the information being out there for all to see.
  
  Report this comment
- mrunner
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:09pm
  @Juststupid – Aiding the enemy, life in prison. Hoping your furher gets the same…
  
  Report this comment
- FISH_BONE
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:09pm
  ANGRY: Why does it matter what the content was?
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:22pm
  @mrunner, Um, you’re the one relying on the communist media’s account instead of checking the primary sources. So you’re the one blindly following YOUR fuhrer not me. I looked at the stuff before making my decision.
  
  Fish_Bone, So you’re argument is the less we know the better? We have an untrustworthy government now, true or false? That’s why it matters. .
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:23pm
  Angry
  If he dumped where all the bots got their weed and crisco we wouldn’t be hearing from you. Just saying. I think he needs a final cig and a blindfold, but I don’t exactly have sway over UCMJ.
  
  Report this comment
- Walkabout
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 8:49pm
  Clothing could be used in a suicide attempt for making a noose. It has been done before.
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 9:17pm
  Hey if you all want to remain ignorant on what’s going on over there that’s on you. I’ve been over there and I’m telling you it’s BS and I’m not alone. I know Walkabout and Fubared want everyone to remain ignorant. Statist trolls sent to keep the masses uninformed about the Obama war machine… Isn’t that what you guys are really doing?
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 9:30pm
  Angry, this is a whole big conspiracy where an E3 didn’t dump to an internet site?
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 9:52pm
  Have you read the wikileaks dump, Fubared? If you had you’d realize the only black eye was on a corrupt Obama administration. Don’t you want everyone to know the truth about the corrupt peace loving Obama administration?
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 10:05pm
  Sure Angry who doesn’t? Doesn’t mean I want to have it handed to me by a little punk ass PFC that has no idea what an oath is. He played poker with a crappy hand and now has UCM justice looking at him, hard. What happens will come out, no doubt. It’s how it comes out too. No cities being nuked or races being purged while we carry on. Ever heard the fruit of an evil tree argument?
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on January 8, 2013 at 10:21pm
  An oath to defend the Constitution is all he took. The globalist NWO Marxists running this country are domestic enemies waging unconstitutional wars for Nato and UN. He did his duty.
  
  Report this comment

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.