Biden to Give Obama Gun Recommendations by Tuesday: ‘Gun Ownership and the Type of Weapons That Can Be Owned’

Vice President Joe Biden makes brief remarks to the press after a meeting with Cabinet members and sportsmen’s, wildlife and gun interest groups at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building Jan. 10, 2013 in Washington, D.C. President Barack Obama appointed Biden to oversee a task force on gun violence. (Getty Images)
Vice President Joe Biden said Thursday he will give President Barack Obama his recommendations about how to deal with gun violence by Tuesday.
Biden was tapped to lead an administration task force after a gunman shot to death 20 children and six adults at an elementary school in Newtown, Conn.
“There’s an emerging set of recommendations, not coming from me but coming from the groups we’ve met with,” Biden said during a day meeting with sportsmen and wildlife interest groups. “And I’m going to focus on the ones that relate primarily to gun ownership and the type of weapons that can be owned. And one is…a surprising recurrence of suggestions that we have universal background checks. Not just close the gun show loophole but total, universal background checks, including private sales.”
He said it was also crucial for federal agencies to be able to gather data about gun violence, including “what kind of weapons are used most to kill people” and “what kind of weapons are trafficked weapons,” according to the White House pool report.
“There has got to be some common ground, to not solve every problem but diminish the probability” of future mass shootings, Biden said. “That’s what this is all about. There are no conclusions I have reached.”
Obama vowed last month “whatever power this office holds” to prevent future mass shootings.
After meeting with gun safety groups Wednesday, Biden said the president could take “executive action” to crack down on guns. Biden was set to meet with National Rifle Association representatives later on Thursday.
Biden described himself as a shotgun owner but said he’s “no great hunter, it’s mostly skeet shooting for me.”
–
​Related:
Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.















































































































Comments (36)
jessieH
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 10:02amAnyone who talks about taking our Rights, talks about changing the Constitution, is comitting treason. The government can’t seem to get guns away from the gangs, so they now want ours. The government can go regulate themselves. They are breaking their Oath of Office.
Report this comment
bmb776
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 10:41amYou sound alot like the anti-abolishionists in “Lincoln”.
Report this comment
heeltar
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 9:47pmYou can have this gun but not that one, these bullets but not those, anti depressants, sorry no gun for you. Little by little, bit by bit our 2nd amendment rights will be taken and with that gone, all the rest will soon follow, for there will be no citizens left, only subjects.
Report this comment
EJ1979
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 8:40amOver my dead body.
Report this comment
A Hoosier Says
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 9:29pmIt’s probably been said, but I believe they are trying to hype up what they plan to do in order to make people furious. After Congress negotiates back and forth, they will pass some small gun control measures such as banning high capacity mags, and people will say “well, that’s not too bad, I can live with that”
Don’t fall for their tactics. Progressives have mastered the art of slowly chipping away at our rights. They’ve been doing it for nearly a century.
Report this comment
hades3
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 9:28pmSo this the “State of Our Nation” VP Bite Me too recommend what type of guns American can own.
This man apparently suffering from the early stages of “dementia”. Sorry, allow me to correct myself.
He has been “demented” for a long time. Putting him in a position of deciding anything, is a danger
too our country. God forbid he would be forced too replace Obama as president. That would take us from terrible to completely outrageous, on second thought to utter disaster. It’s hard too govern
when you are unable too find your own behind.
Report this comment
Disgusted_in_CT
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 9:27pmI will never comply with any order from this fake president and biden.
NEVER.
It is coming close to the time to refresh the tree of liberty.
Report this comment
JEANNIEMAC
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 8:00pmhttp://dancingczars.wordpress.com/2013/01/09/breaking-news-chief-justice-of-the-supreme-court-john-roberts-schedules-a-case-by-attorney-taitz-regarding-obamas-forged-ids-to-be-heard-in-conference-before-the-full-supreme-court/#respond
If Obama is found guilty of lying his way into the presidency, he and all those who facilitated his actions can be arrested and put into prison. All of Obama’s executive orders, czars and Obamacare can be revoked.
We must show up in the court and show our support for Orly Taitz. She is one brave woman.
Report this comment
RDMercer
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 7:34pmThey can all go fk themselves. They have the audacity to tell us what weapons we can own but they own anything they desire. When can we start hanging these bastards?
Report this comment
loveoursoldiers
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 7:31pmand once again the Master of deceit will blame Joe and “the American people” for what he has intended to do.. what he dreamed about…… and he will pretend he is only doing what others want
only a slimy serpent would use a national tragedy to push his agenda
I think regular Americans are waking up.. even those who voted for him
I heard a caller on a talk show today who is a cop who that if he is told to confiscate a gun from a law abiding citizen per ‘the usurper of the 2nd amendment” …….he will refuse
Report this comment
pma_guy
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 7:14pmThe little socialist in the White House will NEVER take our guns!!! My dad fought for our freedom during WW2 and my uncle was Killed in the Korean war protecting our freedom to bear arms. We need our guns to protect us from wannabe dictators like barack insane obama! NO ONE will take our guns or prevent us from buying them regardless of executive “order” !!!! I’m a Conservative Patriot and REFUSE to give in to ANY marxist!! You think your family can have armed protection, but NOT mine??? Go SCREW YOURSELF barack!
Report this comment
JEANNIEMAC
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 7:00pmEfficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.
** SPREAD THIS TO EVERYONE **
The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular army. The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy.
Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654
of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The President of the United States has zero authority without violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their State borders.
The National Guard Militia can only be required by the National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to uphold the laws of the Union; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion). These are the only purposes for which the General Government can call upon the National Guard.
Attorney General Wickersham advised President Taft, “the Organized Militia (the National Guard) can not be employed for offensive warfare outside th
Report this comment
ICEDRAGONNITE
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 6:55pmHere’s one for Good Ole Joe
The Quest For The Ultimate Power! 1/10/2013
As Vice President Joe Biden puts on his act of looking for answers to what is needed for gun control, he is also espousing the side stepping of Congress, via Presidential Order to enact gun control bans on various part of weapons or a weapon that looks a certain way or adding additional expenses on the licensing of said weapons or ammunition.
I understand the heartfelt knee jerk reaction to the school shootings across the nation. However to null or change an Amendment to the Constitution of the United States by Presidential Order is Unconstitutional. In fact Presidential Orders themselves are Unconstitutional but have not been challenged at this time. So to accept that the President or Vice president can assume the power of the people to change a Right given by our Creator is absolutely an act of SEDITION or even HIGH TREASON. Any Congressmen allowing this Presidential Order to stand, without taking action against the said same is him/her-self guilty of Sedition and Treason by means of quietly standing by and doing nothing. This is called Nonfeasance. Which is tantamount to voting affirmative, for this Presidential Order of GUN Control or the Banning of parts or ammunition for said guns. Including the over regulation of such.
Below are the reasons for the Bill Of Rights as argued by our forefathers.
During the debates on
Report this comment
go2gym
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 6:30pmTime to tell Biden to pound sand.
Report this comment
go2gym
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 6:29pmThe 2nd Amendment is in ink.
Report this comment
Sosorryforyou
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 7:11pmAnd has been interpreted since it was written by many, including the NRA, to further their own agenda. Why is it okay for them to rationalize/interpret the 2nd Amendment, but when the US Gov. does, it’s called unconstitutional?
Report this comment
thegreatcarnac
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 6:01pmI was planning to die at a very old age but looks like I may be shot a lot earlier. I will not comply and I will fight. Who is this illegal Kenyan to tell me what gun I can own. Who is this communist who pretends to be an American president but trashes the constitution. The regime does not know what it is in for. We will fight if we must. This government is a rogue government and should be treated as such. The USA is no longer. Maybe we can bring it back.
Report this comment
P4cooler
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 5:44pmThe left wing anti gun fanatics are determined to push this narrative that guns are responsible for today’s violence. Here is a guy who pointed to the pharmaceutical industry in a newspaper article and suddenly died a mysterious death. http://www.naturalnews.com/038616_John_Noveske_mysterious_death_car_crash.html Looks like Washington DC liberals are determined to grab our guns and kill anyone who might stop that process…….
Report this comment
jamestoms
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 5:38pmGrand daddy biden hear the screaming of the millions of babies ripped from the womb, can you? Filthy beast of the pit.
Report this comment
taintso
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 5:26pmHow about giving out RPG’s with the Obama phones that will work just as well as gun control.
Report this comment
taintso
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 5:23pmWhy not just pass an gun making it illegal for anyone to possess any fire arm within 5 miles of any US Soldier serving overseas. That would end our problems in the middle east and elsewhere in the world. I am sure it would work, just like L.A., Chicago, and Detroit.
Report this comment
blackfeather
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 5:20pmmaybe the gastapo will let you have a bb pistol.
Report this comment
taintso
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 5:31pmBut no ‘Daisy Red Rider Repeating Air Rifle’.
Report this comment
thegreatcarnac
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 5:57pm‘you’ll put your eye out’….(smile) better to put their’s out.
Report this comment
IndyGuy
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 10:56pmKid…
Report this comment
Meggers55
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 5:08pmHere’s a thougt. Give all of us little nobodys secret service protection, then you jerks can tell me what kind of gun I can own.
Report this comment
lcuvillier
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 5:05pmIf they can tell you what you can own, they can take it away. When is the tipping point going to happen when people have enough of this overreaching government.
Report this comment
BlasberryStrat
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 4:57pmBet your **** that he is going to include that you have to sign and be checked each time you try to purchase ammo. BUT if you have any indication of “mental instability” you will be denied the sale. MEANING if you even have or have had in the past, a prescription for “Wellbutrin” used purely as an aid to stop smoking, you will be denied. It’s going to be the same thing as trying to get any quality Life Insurance after you have one mark of being prescribed antidepressants in your medical file. And ANYONE having a prescription for Xanax simply because their Boss is a slave driving **** head – you too will have the ‘big red flag’ by your name.
Can you say “No Fly List”?
Report this comment
danger08
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 10:47pmYep, it’s jacked up. The mental health issue is a big deal concerning these shootings. And I agree, they will narrow it down to the point that any medication that can be construed as problematic will bar an individual from owning guns. There are safeguards in place for mental health in NICS but you can’t stop someone from stealing a gun. They are essentially accusing everyone of being a mass murderer unless you can prove otherwise. That’s impossible to do until you die without having committed murder. You can’t predict what a sane person will do or what a person with mental issues will do. Congress can’t see the future of people or determine their intentions. The focus should be on education concerning bullying, gun safety and the desensitizing of our kids to murder via movies and games. No amount of laws will prevent someone from committing a crime. It will prevent a law abiding citizen, but by definition, criminals break laws. Obviously they don’t care. My advice to the king and his court jester is to work on the desensitizing of our youth to killing, go after the gang bangers and their guns and leave law abiding citizen’s rights alone.
Report this comment
Obama Snake Oil Co
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 4:55pmSo after 911 didn’t they require background checks on people buying boxcutters? Not a single gun was used for one of the largest mass murders in the history of America….Boxcutters….
Report this comment
john vincent
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 6:04pmgood call- snake-
along these lines, you will prob. appreciate this
http://sienna48.blog.com/2013/01/08/response-to-general/
Report this comment
No-Really
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 4:54pmIf they are gonna track what guns are used most to “kill people” they should also track when they are used to defend people.
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/require-collection-and-tracking-defensive-gun-use-statistics/ysdvL7nT
Report this comment
DougHuffman
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 4:49pmDear Governor Walker,
I fear the Union that the Federal Government has become. I will be
killed by its agents before I surrender my Rights, my Freedoms or my
guns. If there is to be bloodshed then I prefer it mine, now, than my
daughter’s.
I have conveyed my disapproval of the Federal Executive’s plans to my
Federal representatives. The most senior of which telephone is too busy
to hear me.
Please speak loudly and act effectively for Wisconsin in the cause of
Freedom, Liberty, our Constitutions and the Bill of Rights. There is no
right to security or absence of fear. There are rights to life, liberty
and the pursuit of happiness. Without defense of self from the slings
and arrows of bitter vicissitude there is no Life.
I have participated in American civic and political life in complete
faith in the rule of law. I am an Honorably Discharged Vietnam Era
veteran and retiree from secure Federal Civil Service. I am not
affluent or in debt. I do not have a police record beyond traffic
infractions, the most recent of which in 1977(!). I am a Confessed
Faithful Lutheran, saved by Faith in Grace and eager to meet my God.
Much political commerce today is in memes. GUN REGULATION WILL BE AS
EFFECTIVE AS REGULATION OF COCAINE AND HEROIN.
Sincerely respectful, I am,
Doug Huffman
Washington Island
Wisconsin
CC: I have taken the liberty of copying this widely.
Report this comment
cloudmcrain
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:51amSolid letter. I hope he’s listening.
Report this comment