‘Wilkow!’: Is Obama Taking Aim at the Second Amendment?
The National Rifle Association did not leave happy after their meeting with Vice President Joe Biden Thursday. Biden met with the NRA as part of the White House task force on gun violence he is leading in wake of the massacare shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut last month.
“We were disappointed with how little this meeting had to do with keeping our children safe and how much it had to do with an agenda to attack the Second Amendment,” the NRA said in a statement on the meeting with task force put in place by President Obama. “While claiming that no policy proposals would be ‘prejudged,’ this Task Force spent most of its time on proposed restrictions on lawful firearms owners – honest, taxpaying, hardworking Americans. ”
Tom Fitton, President of Judicial Watch, joined ‘Wilkow!’ Thursday to discuss the Second Amendment, the president’s power with executive order, and the NRA’s meeting with Biden. Watch a clip from the show below:
Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.








































































































bluesmovers
Posted on January 13, 2013 at 8:30pmI say it is likely that a communist PURGE has begun …
all of us should watch our backs and be ready for ANYTHING.
I do not put these things past the current government, REMEMBER ANDREW BREITBART?
This article is a MUST READ…. it helps to connect a LOT of information.
Coincidences? Increasingly less likely, in my opinion.
The days ahead may be very hard for us.
Prominent rifle manufacturer killed in mysterious car crash days after posting psych drug link to school shooters
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/038616_john_noveske_mysterious_death_car_crash.html#ixzz2HuCbJB3X
John Noveske … suspicious car crash… what to think?
http://redflagnews.com/headlines/2nd-well-known-player-in-the-firearms-industry-killed-in-a-somewhat-mysterious-car-crash
Keith Ratliff murdered, as well as another gun designer (John Noveske) killed in a highly suspicious car crash in the same week. It is important to note, that it does not appear that anything was stolen from the gun shop Keith was found in… if this was “normal” crime, you would think they would take some guns with them. I hope and pray this isn’t the beginning of the traditional Communist purge of the opposition to their rule.
http://www.myfoxatlanta.com/story/20538156/fpsrussia#.UPIybY6fA2Y.facebook
YouTube gun enthusiast’s shooting death spurs hunt for suspect
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/09/georgia-authorities-hunt-suspect-in-shooting-death-youtube-gun-enthusiast/
Report this comment
GWConstitution
Posted on January 13, 2013 at 11:56amThere are more killings with a baseball bat than there ever was, is, or will be with a gun. It is not the gun but the person. So when are baseball bats going to no longer be legal to own? Will this mean Professional Baseball Payers will no longer be able to play with Baseball Bats?
Report this comment
JEANNIEMAC
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:38pmhttp://www.fieldandstream.com/forums/hunting/dick-act-1902-cant-be-repealed-gun-control-forbidden-protection-against-tyrannical-go
There is already a law on the books forbidding any gun control laws. The gun control crowd didn’t do their homework. Lots of sound and fury signifying nothing.
Report this comment
LibertySoul
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:55amWe are already in a state of civil war since Obama’s re-election. By year’s end, he will have declared martial law.
Report this comment
Sosorryforyou
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 7:04pmPres. Obama has no intention of declaring martial law. That’s just your delusional mind playing tricks on you. And, the only place I’ve heard or read about a modern day civil war is in the Blaze and on other wack-job sites. If that happens, it will be started by you and your ilk for no reason other than that you truly desire a war against our government. Our government isn’t against you, but you all are surely against it. When did Conservativism become equated with war-mongering lowlifes. You use to be respected but no longer.
Report this comment
LibertySoul
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:48amBy the end of 2013, the nation will be in a civil war, or succession from various states, or martial law, or of the above.
Report this comment
LibertySoul
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:43amBy year’s end, The U.S. will be in civil war, or succession from various states, or all out martial law.
Report this comment
starider
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 10:51amOur Right to Keep and Bear Arms represents our ability to resist Tyranny in Goverment, that’s what this is all about, simple as that. The writtings of our Founding Fathers make it clear they intended for US to retain the weapons necessary to ensure our Freedom. Discussion over…..
Report this comment
starider
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 10:40amBidens group of Leftists in these so-called talks have a predetermined outcome. The goal is to do as much damage to the 2nd Amend. as possible, not save lives. Obama and his cabinet all have a long history of anti 2nd Amend. sentiment. The Constitution itself has been repeatedly ignored or undermined and is under attack from all sides. Too few Americans recognize the danger our remaining Freedoms are in or are willing to surrender them for a sence of security. It’s NOT our guns they wish to TAKE, it is our FREEDOM that our guns represent.
Report this comment
NativeCollector
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 9:09amFitton nailed it. Obama is incapable of governing within our Constitution. This should not surprise anyone, as he stated over a decade ago that he viewed the Constitution as a series of ‘negative liberties.’ He wants the government to take care of us, as he thinks we are too stupid (he’d never admit that he thinks that, but he must!) to make our own decisions. It is all about control!
Report this comment
NativeCollector
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 9:06amFitton nailed it. Obama is incapable of governing within the Constitution. This should come as no surprise to anyone, as he stated over a decade ago, that the Constitution is a series of “negative liberties.” He thinks government should take care of us all, therefore, he sees no need of guns in the hands of any private citizen, only in the aresnal of the regime.
There are a lot of good posts on this topic on Fundamental Refounding fundamentalrefounding.ning They even started a Second Amendment category. Take a look, they even have an RSS feed to here.
Report this comment
NativeCollector
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 9:00amFitton nailed it. Obama is incapable of governing within the confines of the Constitution. This should come as no surprise to anyone who knows what he said over a decade ago, about our Constitution being a series of ‘negative liberties.’ Pro-Second Amendment representatives are not making the right arguments. The Second Amendment does not exist to guarantee Americans can hunt. It exists to protect us from a regime like we seem to have now. Too many people are still asleep. We’re in trouble.
There are a number of good stories posted on this topic on Fundamental Refounding fundamentalrefounding.ning They even started a ‘Second Amendment’ category. Check it out, they have a RSS feed to here, too, by the way.
Report this comment
r3dbull4dd1kt
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 8:46amit has never been about ‘saving lives’ it has ALWAYS been about the systematic destruction of Democracy and Free Market Economics…this IS A LIBERAL JIHAD folks!
They have indoctrinated the weak-minded by brainwashing them in ‘No Child Left Behind’ re-education camps we call schools, they have demonized Conservatives views and values, they have undermined the US Constitution and bullied the Supreme Court into approving illegal legislation–what about these Tyrannical Socialists wanting to systematically disarm the population is so shocking? It is ALWAYS step 1 in the Forced Socialism Playbook!
Report this comment
truthspeare
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 7:38amThe second amendment is an individual right that the executive branch may curtail. What is the nature of a man to take such power? Such power is temporal. The right of self-defense comes from a higher power, our creator. Seems we have another Henry the Eighth on our hands.
Seems some men, hold life cheap, with their kill-lists and all, and with their dead red insistence on denying average americans from meaningul self-defense from non-law-abiding citizens who still carry and will still carry auto and semi- auto weapons no matter the ban. I will know if the President holds our lives cheaper than his, and that of his family, if he provides an exemption for himself and his family, that is, they will still be protected with semi- or auto matic weapons that we are banned from having.
But exactly how does the math work on this? How is his life, and his family’s life, worth more than mine and that of my family? I would like to see the math. I would like to see the equation. How is his life worth more than mine. More private individuals are killed than public officials by semi and automatic weapons, so to exempt public officials and to deprive private individual is patently absurd.
There is no talk of securing the border. What exactly will a ban do then? A ban is a paper tiger. They are obviously confused. I must conclude they are morons.
Report this comment
TEARS FOR AMERICA
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 8:12amSecuring the border WOULD have been the most obvious place to start but that is not the agenda for this administration…it is collapse and control.
Report this comment
truthspeare
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 7:13amRufus
Randy Vance, The Betty Maes
Album: Not Now, Sometimes, January 2013
A boy Rufus lives in Tennessee
He loves this pretty girl named Ellie
Both work at a small town factory
Although Rufus was a music guy
He worked with greasy hands to get by
To stay where his heart demanded he be
Close to little ole Ellie
Giving up is lost on those who love
Rufus always a loser at romance
So with Ellie he never took a chance
Rufus tried to find his nerve
Questions as to if he was what Ellie deserved
It just so happened a tall boy moved in town
He used his pool blue eyes to lure all the girls’ around
His parents owned more than anyone in town before
You could imagine it, but you doubt, there was plenty more.
Then along came the local dance
Rufus took this as another chance
But as across the gym he met Ellie’s eyes
Ole Blue eyes caught Ellie by surprise
And as Blue eyes swept Ellie about the gym
Rufus could only dream about her then
The same old fears gripping him again
And then by the end of the dance
Rufus knew he had to take a chance
Just so happened Ellie had a birthday soon
Rufus suffered to conceive a plan to fine tune
And what should this masterpiece include
Is there a formula for her to him to be glued
That night a wind blew into his room
And then an angel appeared in his dream
And helped Rufus with a workable scheme
A voice said Rufus you’re a real good man,
You’ve always been kind, doing the best you can
Report this comment
Evo1
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 11:43pmAccording to the FBI, so-called “assault weapons” are used in only 2% of gun crimes, and in less than 1% of murders, despite the AR-15 being the most commonly owned rifle in the US.
FBI estimates are that 60-90% of all gun murders are a result of the illegal drug trade.
The Department of Justice says that 56% of all murderers had a prior conviction for a violent felony when they killed.
So, if Obama’s campaign was about reducing gun violence or saving lives, they’d be discussing ending the war on drugs and passing a national 2-strikes law for violent felonies. Those two alone, according to their own best data, would, at a minimum, reduce gun murders in the US by 65-75%.
Instead, they want to ban the legal ownership of a type of gun used in less than 1% of killings in the US, which will have no effect at all on gun violence or violent crime in general.
So, you tell me, is Obama trying to save lives by the most reasonable and effective means at his disposal, or is he just exploiting tragedy, fear, and ignorance in order to pass his wishlist of anti-gun legislation?
Report this comment
Magyar
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 11:24pmI predict there will more than just a ban on assault weapons— he will go for the whole enchilada and confiscate all weapons knowing it will lead to insurrection. The TSA will then move in and do whatever they want……
Be ready!
Report this comment
PatriotSunDevil
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 5:28amEntrench and hold your ground people. Our founding fathers our depending on us to preserve the rights that God gave us.
Report this comment
Rillobymorning
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 10:31amThey better start building some new jails then, because the majority will not comply. There is no way I’d hand my guns over to anyone.
Report this comment
IndyGuy
Posted on January 10, 2013 at 11:19pmIs that burnt gun powder I smell???
Report this comment