Developing: Pakistani Plane Escorted by UK Fighter Jets — 2 Men Arrested
Doc Thompson’s 24-hour radio marathon, ‘#24forok,’ continues until 9 am ET — Listen Live!
‘How Dare You’: Conservative Author Confronts Piers Morgan on Exploiting Newtown, Hands Him a Constitution in Tense Interview
CNN
Conservative author and Breitbart editor-at-large Ben Shapiro on Thursday accused CNN’s Piers Morgan of “standing on the graves of the children” who died in Newtown, Conn. in his opposition to guns.
“Honestly Piers, you’ve kind of been a bully on this issue,” Shapiro said on “Piers Morgan Tonight.” “You tend to demonize people who differ from you politically by standing on the graves of the children of Sandy Hook, saying they don’t seem to care enough about the dead kids, if they cared more about the dead kids they would agree with you on policy.”
Morgan, who has been at the forefront of the anti-gun argument on his show, reacted with outrage, repeatedly asking Shapiro, “How dare you?”
“How dare you accuse me of standing on the graves of children that died there, how dare you?” he asked.
“I’ve seen you do it repeatedly, Piers,” Shapiro said.
“Like I say, how dare you,” Morgan repeated.
“Well, I mean, you can keep saying that, but you’ve done it repeatedly,” Shapiro replied. “What you do, and I’ve seen you do it on your program, is you keep saying to folks if they disagree with you politically, then somehow this is a violation of what happened in Sandy Hook.”
Then, taking out a pocket-sized Constitution, Shapiro handed it to Morgan and said he’d like to hear his policy ideas for guns.
“I’ve brought this here for you so you can read it,” he said. “I would really like for you to explain to me what you would do about guns that would have prevented what happened at Sandy Hook.”
Morgan responded that he would like to do the same thing that Mark Kelly, husband of former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, would like to do, which is take away assault weapons. Shapiro pointed out that the majority of gun deaths in United States are caused by handguns, prompting Morgan to run down the recent shootings in Newtown, the Aurora movie theater, the Oregon shopping mall and in New York with the firefighters around Christmas, asking which weapons were used.
“The last four mass shootings in America were with assault rifles…that’s the reason, Mr. Shapiro,” Morgan said. “You can smirk at me and you can laugh at me, and you can accuse me of standing on the graves of dead children, but that’s the reason that people like me and Mark Kelly and Gabrielle Giffords want to have assault weapons like that removed from civilian hands.”
Shapiro responded that Morgan’s “passion on the issue doesn’t really justify the rationale for why you want to ban assault weapons.”
Watch the full 14-minute interaction below:
–
Related:
- Alex Jones Goes Ballistic Debating Gun Control With Piers Morgan: ’1776 Will Commence Again If You Try to Take Our Firearms!’
- White House Petition Calls for…Deporting Piers Morgan Over Anti-Gun Views
- ‘Answer My Question!’: Angry Piers Morgan Berates Gun Advocate Over How Many Bullets an AR-15 Can Fire in One Second (Featuring TheBlaze’s Will Cain)
Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.
Popular Stories
John McCain Lectures Tea Party Senator on How ‘Business’ Gets Done in Congress: ‘That’s What We’ve Been Doing for a Couple Hundred Years’ 569 Comments
Boy Scouts of America Vote to Allow Gay Members 509 Comments
Pope Francis’ Sermon Sparks Debate: ‘Even the Atheists’ Have Been Redeemed ‘With the Blood of Christ’ 488 Comments
Obama Doesn’t Return Marine’s Salute, Shakes Hand Instead — Is This a Protocol Misstep? 360 Comments
Piers Morgan Bans Dana Loesch From His Show Following Twitter Spat: ‘Show Some Bloody Respect’ 334 Comments
Faith
-
Game-Changing Bombshell? There’s a Major Twist in the Story About a High School Student’s Lesbian Relationship With a Minor
268 Comments
- Is the Boy Scouts’ Gay Amendment the ‘Beginning of the End’ for the Group? (Plus: Tell Us Where You Stand) 249 Comments
-
MSNBC Hosts Martin Bashir and Chris Hayes Claim London Machete Killers Aren’t Terrorists: ‘These Are Just Murderers’
144 Comments
-
Did You Catch the Possibly Policy-Changing Ft. Hood Reference in Obama’s Terror Speech?
Read More
-
Dem. Rep. Apologizes for Attending ‘Racist, Anti-Semitic and Homophobic’ Speech
Read More
Business
-
Have You Had Scotch at a NJ TGI Friday’s Lately? You Might Have Been Drinking Rubbing Alcohol
Read More
-
Venezuelan President Blames Toilet Paper Shortage on the Rich
Read More
-
This Terrible Chart Shows the Change in Food Stamp Participation Over the Last 10 Years
Read More
- Disney Makes Absolutely Mortifying Photoshop Mistake Read More
-
Trey Gowdy at It Again — This Time with a Jack Bauer Reference!
117 Comments
Technology
-
LOOK: Woman Claims to Have Photographed UFO in California
Read More
-
Lion Named ‘Bonedigger’ and Small Dog Make Most Unlikely Companions
Read More
-
Rocket Bike Sets Land Speed Record — and Uses a Fuel You Wouldn’t Expect
Read More
-
How 3D Printing Technology Created a Special Part for Baby’s Windpipe and Saved His Life
Read More
-
6 Fascinating Spy Gadgets You’ll Probably Want (and Can Have) After Seeing
Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (332)
mcmeador
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:25amWow, Shapiro owned him. I only wish that he hadn’t let Piers put him in a position where he felt obligated to explain why people would need an “assault weapon.” While his response was a good one, it’s really none of Piers’ or the government’s business why we might “need” an assault weapon. That is irrelevant. The government shouldn’t be able to ban something just because of a perceived lack of need for it. Do you need a fancy watch to tell time? No. Does that mean the government should be able to ban them? Absolutely not.
Report this comment
searching for the Truth
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:29amBy the way ! Someone can be killed very easily with a watch.
Report this comment
searcher619
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:40amHow about pencils? Why do you suppose we don’t see those very much any more? Obsolescence? NO! They are deadly weapons!
Report this comment
lovenfl3
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:42amPiers Morgan needs to watch this video. Then he can explain to all of us how gun free zones, weapons bans, and smaller magazine clips will stop these tragedies. Like a typical liberal, he wants to “feel better” about a tragedy. In reality it’s merely pushing a political agenda. This is a must see for both sides of the issue. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbY1whAjGls
Report this comment
salvawhoray
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:43amdon’t forget the Five Finger Death Punch.
Report this comment
pakaeboiboi
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:47amPiers ….. here is the answer to your question ….. SLAVES DON’T NEED GUNS ….. disarm the SLAVES before its too late …..
Report this comment
Gold Coin & Economic News
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:49amPiers Morgan wouldn’t knwo the meaning of the Constitution if he tried to figure it out. Unfortunately, neither does Governor Cuomo of New York:
http://www.isthatbaloney.com/new-york-governor-andrew-cuomo-to-propose-unconstitutional-gun-control-laws/
Report this comment
beekeeper
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:51amI also am confused about ‘needs-based’ rights.
Why do women need abortions if contraceptives are being provided freely?
Report this comment
searching for the Truth
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:54amIn fact ! There is a very infamous ( catch the word use ) hitman that killed with a watch.
Report this comment
JohnnyinthePedros
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:00pmWhy didn’t Piers mention Columbine? Because it happened under the umbrella of an “assault weapon” ban.
Report this comment
rickinpa
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:02pmI agree with your statement ask why do people need sports cars that go 120 mph when the national speed limit is 65-75MPH throughout MOST of the country, but I also would have asked Pierce what about the people living on the mexican border who need protection from the drug lords armed with AK47 supplied by obama’s justice department? Should they be limited to defend themselves with hand guns? How about the Koreans defending their property against the mobs after the Rodney King beating should they have been limited to handgun against hundreds of people? The reasons may be limited but they do exist in this day and age and as you stated WE THE PEOPLE are not required to defend the need for everything we buy you can’t take away my right because someone else has disobeyed the law, WHAT HAPPENED TO DUE PROCESS?
Report this comment
banjarmon
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:02pmPiers what part of ‘SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” do you not understand!!
Report this comment
ishka4me
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:03pmI was watching and noticed complete smug arrogance when piers belittled the Constitution. Maybe he thinks it is a charter of negative liberties also.
Report this comment
gb123
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:47pm@619
How about automatic pencils with multiple leads. We should limit them to 2 leads only. More would be too dangerous.
Report this comment
zorro
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:50pm“The last four mass shootings in America were with assault rifles…” First off, they weren’t. They look like assault riffles but by definition, an assault rifle is full auto and none of these rifles were. Second, when “the last four mass shootings in America” are with a semi-automatic pistol, are you going to ban those as well? I know, I know. “You can’t have a ‘mass’ shooting with a pistol,” right? WRONG. You can take out a lot of folks with a couple of .38 six shooters. Certainly 6 or 7 which would be considered a “mass” shooting. But then again, perhaps Morgan wouldn’t think of this as a big deal.
Report this comment
George Patton
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:54pmPiers stated it was against the law for him to purchase 6 boxes of sudafed yet there he sat with 6 boxes of sudafed. There has never been a more perfect illustration on why banning something will not prevent people from acquiring it if they want to! So banning “assault” rifles will not prevent people who want them from acquiring them.
Shapiro is a great debater.
Report this comment
pagraywolf
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 1:01pmRickinPA
You posted what I wanted to write! Border safety!!!!!!!!! I know citizens living very close to the Mexican border. They are of Mexican heritage and they are armed to protect themselves from the illegals crossing into our/their country! They don’t feel safe at night in their own homes in Texas!! Great scott…
Report this comment
Maji
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 1:21pmWhy does an (this) alien come to America to discuss our laws?
Because he’s a joke in Briton and they don’t (won’t) give him a platform to belch propaganda.
Report this comment
desertspeaks
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 1:37pmALL courts inclusive of the supreme court have persistently ruled that “fundamental principle of American law that a government and its agents “POLICE” are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any individual citizen.”
The court held that the San Jose police were not liable for ignoring Mrs. Brunell’s pleas for help. Hartzler v. City of San Jose, 46 Cal. App. 3d 6 1st Dist. 1975
Riss v. New York, 240 N.E.2d 860 N.Y. 1968
Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 D.C. Ct. of Ap., 1981
DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services 109 S.Ct. 998, 1989
Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department. 901 F.2d 696 9th Cir. 1990
Moreover, Zinermon v. Burch 110 S.Ct. 975, 984 1990
all the aforementioned cases resulted in the death
Constitutional duties of care and protection only exist as to certain individuals, such as incarcerated prisoners, involuntarily committed mental patients and others restrained against their will and therefore unable to protect themselves.
Neither a public entity or a public employee [may be sued] for failure to provide adequate police protection or service, failure to prevent the commission of crimes and failure to apprehend criminals.
In other words this means the only people the police are duty-bound to protect are criminals in custody, and other persons in custody for such things as mental disorders. YOU have no recourse if the police fail to respond or fail to protect you from injury
Report this comment
biohazard23
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 1:55pmPiers Morgan is a slinky kind of person. You know, like the toy. He’s pretty useless but it still brings a smile to your face when you think about pushing him down a flight of stairs.
Report this comment
jd9215
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 2:00pmBen is an excellent speaker. He has proven once again that, when confronted with the facts, idiots like Morgan don’t have a leg to stand on.
Report this comment
frust@ted
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 2:04pmA far better argument and much more effective than Alex Jones.
Piers around the end of the debate showed his distain for the constitution which is telling, i wish he would have called him on that a little more.
Lastly this guy nailed it, Peirs ratings have not been great he is using the Sandy Hook shooting much like Nancy Grace exploited the Casey Anthony case to boost her raitings. The guy has no shame, probably why he has been mentioned several times with the phone hacking scandal, nothing has stuck but I would not be shocked if he was involoved.
Report this comment
homotheclown
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 2:33pmCan we remove user:Gold Coin & Economic News?
Report this comment
spirited
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 2:34pm“How dare you” -P Morgan
!8^O , the outrage!
The 1st allows for it “Mr.” Morgan (and gets you a pay check).
>L@@k it up in the “little book”
Report this comment
Iamnotanumber
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 2:41pmWe need them to prevent them from banning them!
Report this comment
Iamnotanumber
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 2:42pmWe need them to prevent them from banning or taking them!
Report this comment
naughtycal
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 2:44pmI would have made pier name the last four mass shooting ….Bcause Va tech was a handgun,so was the recent mass shooting in Chicago. I would have then said in the sandy hook shooting the psycho could have easily filled a couple bottles with gas and killed way more students. Fact is guns are protection from not only other guns but axes,knives,molotovs,machetes,swords,spears,bats pretty much everything. The Psycho could go to a grocery store brought everyday holdhold items and gas the entire school……The only way to guarantee a safe society would be what the robots determined in I ROBOT locking everyone in their homes. But logic and the left are two things that seldom meet. So it would be a waste of time to even say again thing to the debate is over ideology.
Report this comment
Mil-Dot
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 2:52pmShapiro didn’t just own Morgan, he owned his kids, grandkids and their kids. Holy cow. He chewed him up and spit him out. Did you see Morgan holding his left arm in front of his chest, like a shield? That is body language for ” holy crap I am getting my clock cleaned ! “. Totally awesome job by the young Shapiro against the British-commie-prog interloper.
Report this comment
michaelmoron
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 2:53pmMORGAN: Where do you expect tyranny to come from?
SHAPIRO: It could come from the United States, because governments have gone tyrannical before, Piers.
MORGAN: Do you know how absurd you sound?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The following is why Tyranny will come from our “Government”
“When the Federal Reserve Act was passed, the people of these United States did not perceive that a world banking system was being set up here. A super-state controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure. Every effort has been made by the Fed (Reserve) to conceal its powers but the truth is — the Fed has usurped the government!”
Congressman Louis McFadden, Chairman of House Comm. on Banking and Currency from 1920 to 1931
(Eventually Poisoned to death)
“The real truth of the matter is that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government since the days of Andrew Jackson.”
– President FD Roosevelt
“Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this INVISIBLE GOVERNMENT, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of today.”
― Theodore Roosevelt
Report this comment
000degrees
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 3:26pmmorgan is milking this for all it’s worth….nobody would be watching this goof if not for the guests..
Report this comment
GETLIFE
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 3:56pmMorgan obviously thought he was well prepared with all of his notes and props. He was all prepared to be as cooly intimidating as possible– so smug he never saw it coming–and he never recovered from the first “bullying” statement. Shapiro was confident enough to let Morgan take whatever direction he pleased. Come on David Gregory, don’t you want to have a try? You would already know his arguments….
Let’s see if anyone else from the msm has the courage to discuss the issue with someone who truly represents the right.
Report this comment
Drifterbill
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 4:20pmAgain and Again why don’t people being interviewed correct PM by stating that an AR-15 IS NOT AN ASSULT RIFLE!! Assault rifles are fully automatic and already have a total 100% ban to civilians, an AR-15 available to the public is not. I can take a Ruger 10/22 and make it look like a fully auto Assault Rifle but it’s not!! PM’s argument is philosophically obtuse and incorrect on so many levels it’s sickening and frustrating. I bet if you put 10 pics of the same semi auto rifle in front of PM each with a different stock and platform, ol’ numb nuts would say the one dress up with the tactical platform would be the assault weapon..
Report this comment
BOUNCESoff
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 5:19pmIf you think people want assault weapons banned MERELY because of a perceive lack of need, then you are probably about as smart as Sarah Palin
Report this comment
pittjoe09
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 5:43pmVery well said. Every conservative who appears on television to debate liberals on gun control need to say the following when asked about people’s “need” to have AR-15s and 10 round or more magazines (I’m paraphrasing Mark Levin here, but many thanks to him): The Bill of Rights is just that, the Bill of Rights. It’s not the Bill of Needs. The day our government gets to tell us the citizenry what we need and don’t need is the day we have what Shapiro laid out: Tyranny. Apparently Piers Morgan is too naive to believe that would ever happen. His is a pre-1939 mentality.
Report this comment
West Coast Patriot
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 5:44pmIf someone wants an AK bad enough, they can make it themselves starting with a shovel handle: http://www.northeastshooters.com/vbulletin/threads/179192-DIY-Shovel-AK-photo-tsunami-warning
Bans could and will never keep someone determined to acquire anything they want.
Report this comment
JohnnyinthePedros
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 6:04pmI have just created a White House petition pleading with the President to not use Executive Orders to enact any gun control legislation, as it will result in an insurrection. It needs to get 150 signatures to get posted on their site. Please sign it and pass it on. It started out longer, but it’s as long as the gov’s website allows… Here’s the link – http://wh.gov/Pesj
Report this comment
db321
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 6:27pmThis young man is Brilliant. Great debate! Pearce the difference between you and Shapiro is that you think your wise and Shapiro is very Wise. I like this young Man.
Report this comment
mixplix
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 6:36pmWhen our Government purchases millions of rounds of hollow point bullets (against the Geneva Convention and illegal in combat) gives cause for worry that our Government is up to something. A wonderful video and a credit to Ben Shapiro.
Report this comment
mixplix
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 6:45pmOur government purchased millions of rounds of hollow point bullets that are illegal for combat so that gives us cause to worry something is happening that bears watching.
Report this comment
nzkiwi
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 7:01pmA poster on another sight put forward tis letter by a US Marine. It must be said that US Marines write very good letters; is that one basis for selection?
“Human beings only have two ways to deal with one another: reason and force. If you want me to do something for you, you have a choice of either convincing me via argument, or force me to do your bidding under threat of force.
Every human interaction falls into one of those two categories, without exception. Reason or force, that’s it. In a truly moral and civilized society, people exclusively interact through persuasion. Force has no place as a valid method of social interaction and the only thing that removes force from the menu is the personal firearm, as paradoxical as it may sound to some.
When I carry a gun, you cannot deal with me by force. You have to use reason and try to persuade me, because I have a way to negate your threat or employment of force. The gun is the only personal weapon that puts a 100-pound woman on equal footing with a 220-pound mugger, a 75-year old retiree on equal footing with a 19-year old gang banger, and a single guy on equal footing with a carload of drunken guys with baseball bats. The gun removes the disparity in physical strength, size, or numbers between a potential attacker and a defender.
Cont.
Report this comment
decendentof56
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 7:56pmA government becomming “tyrannical” is self-evident. Read history!
Here is a story which winds its way to our current Pres and his views on gun ownership.
Enter one Morio L. Billings (arrestad at least 6 times in 2003):
On the night of Dec 29, 2003, Billings (AWOL from the Army, and seeking items to sell for crack) parked his stolen BMW X5 SUV a short distance from a home he had “hit” the night before. Using the keys from the same house broken into the night before, Billings went inside. Awakened by his burglar alarm at 10:30 pm, Hale DeMar, 54,grabbed his .38 and went downstairs.
DeMar had not had time to change the locks, btw.
DeMars went downstairs, saw a man in his darkened family room and fired 2 shots, hitting Billings, who was masked, in an arm and a leg. Though DeMars actions were labeled self-def – he had an expired firearm ID card, and was fined.
Later, DeMars was arrested and charged with misdemeanor violations for shooting a burglar who had broken into his hom two consecutive nights…..and, stolen his SUV! The charges were dropped.
The Ill Sen. passed SB 2165 (38y-20n) in response to DeMar’s case, asserting a homeowner with the right to defend against a home invasion.
ENTER Barack Obama: He was one of the 20 to vote “n”. Gov Rod Blagojevich vetoed the bill.
On Nov, 9, 2004, the Illinois Senate voted (40-18) to override Blago’s veto.
Barack Obama was one of the 18 who voted to “not” override the corrupt gov’s veto!
Report this comment
decendentof56
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 8:31pmWhen up against someone so illogical as Morgan, you have to turn the table!
Don’t try to convince him that semi-auto weapons should be owned by individual homeowners.
Make him defend!
Say…….”so, Piers, if 1-2-3 armed perp’s break into my home and the they have semi-auto weapons, I should be rendered helpless by only having a 6-shot revolver”? “So, you are for that, right”? “So, you are saying that I should not be able to defend myself and my family against, possibly, multiple attackers with superior weapons”?
Do not lump me in with the gangbangers and convenience store thugs…Piers!
Report this comment
yiska8
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 8:49pmBanning allergy medication just means the cartels buy it from China and manufacture it in Mexico. The price goes up here and the cartels become even more powerful, more wealthy. It changes nothing. If anything it gives American meth makers the excuse to use even more dangerous substances. Too bad they didn’t get into the “Britain” debate. It’s no longer a Kingdom, it’s a cesspool ripe for takeover by the enormous Islamist population that is ready to burn the Union Jack and raise the flag of the crescent moon. What better place and people to rule over when they are unarmed and rendered powerless. The UK is done. Piers Morgan is desperate for ratings, so he’s run his mouth for the last few weeks hoping to get people watching. Alex Jones said the CNN studios looked like a demilitarized zone with panicked,crying producers and the bathrooms/greenrooms were like third world conditions. CNN is tanking and not even this smug little wanker from across the pond can save it. Shapiro held his own. It is a Left/Right issue. And in Reagan’s day we still had Reagan BlueDog Conservative Democrats. It made a difference.Those days have long since gone.
Piers Morgan= Anguis herba (a snake in the grass and a treacherous man)- Virgil
Report this comment
imsteph
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 9:05pmplastic cutlery can be deadly too-yet no one questions the need for that.
should have brought up india, the colonies, north africa, and austraila (prison colonization)….
yeah-the brits are freakin’ LUCKY to have us a friends —well before the obamanation.
Report this comment
wzanesdad
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 9:21pmWOW !!!!….shapiro was awesome…….Made morgan look like a grade schooler…..hahahahahahaha
Report this comment
Thatsitivehadenough
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:44pmOH GOD!!! This was SO GOOD, I can’t begin where to start praising Ben Shapiro!
-he made his point repeatedly
-he kept his cool
-he stayed on topic
-he controlled the conversation
-he made this idiot look exactly like what he is: and anti-American globalist too.
AND…..with his yamulka on his head, his positions on gun ownership & control of same, his position on the US Constitution, progressive taxation, etc: HE ALSO SLAMMED ALL THE ZIONISTS WANT TO CONTROL THE WORLD AND ARE ISRAEL FIRSTERS.
Way to go Ben Shapiro! You were the best today!
Report this comment
PoliticiansRCrooks
Posted on January 12, 2013 at 12:16amWe want assault rifles because if some one tries to come after me with one, I would like to have one. It is called having an even fight. If Tyranny starts coming to streets near you and all you got is a handgun than that won’t do nothing when the other has an automatic or assault rifle.
Report this comment
Maji
Posted on January 12, 2013 at 12:23amHow dare you throw the true up to morgan.
Report this comment
mcmeador
Posted on January 12, 2013 at 1:24amBOUNCESoff, my point is that an argument over “need” has no place in this debate. It has absolutely no relevance. Every argument should be able to stand on its own. That one just like every other that Piers Morgan makes does not.
Report this comment
Ballot_Box_Revolution
Posted on January 12, 2013 at 1:25amThis gut was outstanding in the way he handled piers……This is what we need….
Report this comment
Thatsitivehadenough
Posted on January 12, 2013 at 2:03amOH NO…I MADE A HUGE MISTAKE ON EARLIER POST AND THERE IS NO EDIT! I POSTED THIS:OH GOD!!! This was SO GOOD, I can’t begin where to start praising Ben Shapiro!
-he made his point repeatedly
-he kept his cool
-he stayed on topic
-he controlled the conversation
-he made this idiot look exactly like what he is: and anti-American globalist too.
AND…..with his yamulka on his head, his positions on gun ownership & control of same, his position on the US Constitution, progressive taxation, etc: HE ALSO SLAMMED ALL THE ZIONISTS WANT TO CONTROL THE WORLD AND ARE ISRAEL FIRSTERS.
Way to go Ben Shapiro! You were the best today!
Thatsitivehadenough BUT IT SHOULD HAVE SAID “ANTI-ZIONISTS”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report this comment
Textinstar
Posted on January 12, 2013 at 2:13amAgree, I thought Morgan got owned! I wish Alex Jones could of had an intelligent debate like this.
Report this comment
decendentof56
Posted on January 12, 2013 at 5:10amActually, though Alex “lost it”, I think he did us a favor, along with the CEO mentioned in another story here.
It long been my belief that law-abiding citizens with no criminal record should have any means at their disposal to defend them selves, at home or on the road. There can be no case made for an innocent individual or family to be defenseless against a home invader with possibly superior strength and/or superior firepower.
To tell anyone that they must be in a situation where they must submit to possibly unspeakable sickness is absurd. Ed Schultz, Piers Morgan, B Boxer, Feinstein, and all the rest can GTH!
Report this comment
decendentof56
Posted on January 12, 2013 at 5:18amPeople make me crazy by responding to the trolls here! What do you NOT get about NOT responding to them?
Report this comment
James
Posted on January 12, 2013 at 12:37pmYes! but you have to be careful on the mental illness and the securing of fire arms from children etc. I had my first fire arm a 22 when I was 5. And yes I had access to to the bullets. And as young 16 to 18 year olds etc we would through our fire arms int he back of our old fixem up wheels as we called them in the day and take off to the woods early in the am and have some good ole American fun hunting, shooting and etc. The difference today is the decline of GOD in society/ the decline of the family and education through our local, state, and yes the intrusion of our Federal Governments. Lets replace all members in congress and the senate with new ones until the problem is rectified!
Report this comment
Textinstar
Posted on January 12, 2013 at 12:38pmDof56….. I just think that if Mr Jones kept his emotions under control he could of done more for our fight. Speak softly but carry a big stick( or large caliber) can go a long way. Stay calm but be prepared to defend your beliefs with extreme prejudice
Report this comment
DAGNY
Posted on January 12, 2013 at 4:55pmLove Shapiro but frankly Morgan made his arguments look weak and timid. He should go through public speaking/debating training. Conservatives will never change minds or enlighten while on the defensive. Especially with cocky, hypocrites like Morgan. He uses the same old tactics all the progressives use, he targeted and name called. He put up smoke and mirrors to Shapiro’s arguments (totally progressive/union/thug tactics) and kept Shapiro on the defensive throughout the entire “interview”.
He should have never responded or given Morgan time to site the four most recent killings. He started to rebut with the number of deaths by handguns each year, but let Morgan talk over him, and he never went back at him.
He had his chance to put Morgan in his place and leave him grasping for answers if he would have simply asked Morgan what his real end game is to banning “assault” weapons. (By the way, isn’t every weapon meant to assault?) Because if saving children is the real agenda, we cannot ignore the face that Chicago had close to 500 people shot to death in 2012. If saving children is the real agenda we cannot ignore that that millions of pre-birth infants have been aborted. So Piers, why are you not bullying those who want abortions?
Caution! When debating with a progressive NEVER, EVER answer their agenda-packed questions with facts. You must respond by asking a related question that will highlight their hypocrisy bring the bully’s agenda to light.
Report this comment
TheMarginalizedMan
Posted on January 12, 2013 at 5:58pmDepends on what kind of watch one has… if it is issued by “Q” from MI6 then I’d say it matters…
Report this comment
TheMarginalizedMan
Posted on January 12, 2013 at 6:11pmI have a very simple solution for banning guns, Piers. If you’d like to ban rifles, hand guns, etc… then here’s what you do Mr Morgan. Decree that, “there shall be no hand guns, rifles or armed personnel of any kind in and around the home. We will put bars in the windows and a steel reinforced door to keep out the bad guys.” Build a panic room or whatever else you choose to create to keep you safe from the bad guys who do have gun.
Our solution? Its of our concern and none of your damn business.
Report this comment
Stormy1948
Posted on January 12, 2013 at 8:27pmOr a knife, or car, or a baaseball bat (care to see if they ban baseball bats). Anything can and has been used to kill. Hince the Manson Murders!!! If they take away the guns first, then the knives etc. Will we all finally be safe? Nope! Not evern close!
Report this comment
dmerwin
Posted on January 13, 2013 at 9:32am“How dare you” that is the best that Piers could muster? Shapiro should have used a pair of gloves to slap his face.
Report this comment
A_CALL_TO_CONSCIENCE
Posted on January 13, 2013 at 9:37pmYeah, that’s absurd to think a government would never become tyrannical. Governments never do wrong. They never start wars, never any drone strikes on innocent people, never force some to be sterilized, always treated minorities with equality, never tested drugs on people then had prostitutes sleep with them, never tested mind control on mentally ill people.
Why worry?
Report this comment
Effervescentlady
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:24amIt boggles my mind that some people don’t believe there is a possibility that someday the government could usurp our rights and become a tyrannical government. It has happened over and over. Are they not paying attention? Do they not realize how much has been quietly changed? American citizens suspected of being terrorists can now be detained indefinitly without due process: not just suspected terrorists from other countries; but American citizens, not just on the battlefield, but on American soil. We are slipping and sliding towards tyranny at an extremely fast pace
Report this comment
Uechi
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:38amThe denial that the Government could somehow become tyrannical is amazing but not surpising. Millions of Jews complacently let themselves be segregated, isolated and then sent to death camps. Many stayed in denial unti the Zyklon B started hissing from the ceiling.
Report this comment
searcher619
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:46amTell me abut it. I have tried over and over again to explain this fact to my younger sister. Otherwise she is very intelligent but when it comes to gun ownership her IQ drops to that of a 5 yer old. She uses that stupid question, “How many bullets do you need to kill a deer?” I turn round and ask her if she seriously thinks the founding fathers added the 2nd amendment because they wanted to protect their right to hunt. I force her to remember what they just went through. Who did they just fight to break away from. Then I tell her we need those guns for the reason the founding fathers intended. To allow us the ability to rise up against our government should it ever become tyrannical and threaten our liberty. She can’t imagine that happening today. It keeps blowing my mind.
Report this comment
a true texan
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 1:39pm@Effer-I must admit I was a little behind the 8-ball on that belief UNTIL I began to read books on the holocaust. Each one I read started with a backstory,a few prior, to explain how the government little by little took rights away. Even after they were rounded up and made to move into the ghettos, even as some of the Jews and aliens were being deported even as stories were being told of what was happening-they stayed. Why? Because they didn’t believe it could actually happen. Many Jews had a chance to escape before taken to the trains, even weeks before, and they didn’t do it even as every fiber of their body was telling them too they stayed and they died horrible deaths. Peirs Morgan is an idiot and making false statements he knows damn well what can and will happen!—sorry got a rant!
Report this comment
encinom
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 3:42pmIt boggles the mind that BEckheads believe the fairytales about the NWO, Agenda 21 and other conspiracy theories. It boggles the mind that conservatives will piss on the graves of 20 dead children to protect their toys.
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 4:20pmENCINOM/MONICNE/SLEAZYHIPPO/KREGNEVA/WANGO/HORSIE/PANTY/GLENNDUH/YOURSENSEI…..you don’t have a mind to boggle little guy. Is not so?
Report this comment
michaelmoron
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 7:09pm@Encinom
Do you know ignorant you are for those comments?
the NWO and Agenda 21 are Substantiated FACTS !!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc7i0wCFf8g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2q1Q-9Rcv5o
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3qW2XJZdSA
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You have NO credibility.
Report this comment
michaelmoron
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 7:13pmI have had guns for 17 years EnciLOON.
I have killed NO ONE and have not pissed on any graves (yet).
I will keep my “toys” to protect myself from uneducated morons, like you.
Report this comment
frust@ted
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 8:08pmah encinom how easy it was for you to use those 20 kids, be proud of yourself.
plus it’s amazing that someone like yourself can’t even fathom the idea that it’s possible that the govmt is corupt. Someone who is 50 years old had been around for 20% of the time these freedoms we enjoy have been around. For some reason you think that Freedom is the norm.
Thats including all those horrible years in America that you are ashamed of.
Report this comment
missdagnytaggart
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:51pmThank you encinom, now please go away. Surely you have people to text on your obamaphone.
Report this comment
Something is Wrong
Posted on January 13, 2013 at 8:12amSeriously people! There is no point arguing about what is or isn’t an assault weapon, what should and shouldn’t be banned, or what laws should and shouldn’t be passed. These things all only treat symptoms and not a single one of them will really solve anything at all. The arguments about “the Second Amendment isn’t for hunting” do nothing but waste time and divert attention away from the actual solution that NOBODY is talking about. The real solution to it all is getting rid of the National Guard Act of 1903.
You want the people to take back control of the nation from the government?
Get rid of the National Guard Act of 1903!
You want to end every effort to take away firearms?
Get rid of the National Guard Act of 1903!
You want to stop getting involved in wars that the people of the US do not support?
Get rid of the National Guard Act of 1903!
You want to strengthen the Constitution and restore the Second Amendment as it was in the beginning?
Get rid of the National Guard Act of 1903!
It was the first big Progressive law passed and is the foundation to every Progressive law that has followed it. You knock out the foundation and it’s only a matter of time before everything else follows. This was Teddy Roosevelt’s baby and the first thing he tried to get passed as soon as he became President (note that this is the same Teddy Roosevelt that ran for President under the Progressive Party ticket). The National Guard Act of 1903 needs to go!!!
Report this comment
searching for the Truth
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:21amOh, this guy is bright Breitbart – you better kept this guy !
Report this comment
searching for the Truth
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:04pmCorrection: keep.
Report this comment
FISH_BONE
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 1:19pmtest
Report this comment
The_Cabrito_Goat
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 2:17pmMy posts are actually appearing faster and more often than ever before. Just backspace out of the 404 error message.
Report this comment
searching for the Truth
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 8:15pmThanks, but I disabled my cookie manager – I might try your technique though.
Report this comment
cessna152
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:20amHammers, knives, drunk drivers, baseball bats, pool accidents, etc have 10 times more deaths than “assault weapons”. We need to get of the argument that “it’s the guns”. No, it’s society…it’s a breakdown of families, morals, values and parents that stopped parenting. It’s the removal of God from everything so there is little to no accountability or remorse.
Hollywood, MTV, the media ad schools all promoting “do it if it makes you feel good” mentality. No boundaries, no punishment and no repercussions. Doped up kids told to sit in front of the TV because parent are too overwhelmed to bother with them!! Yes, lets talk about the real issues and stop blaming a tool…
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:16amPierre called the American Constitution…”your little book” in this interview. Apparently Morgan still can’t grasp the vulgarity of an Englishman- who makes a living in the United States no less- denigrating the Constitution and laughing at the purpose of the Second Amendment. Let me put it in these terms…having just won a war against the British and understanding the necessity of a population prepared to resist against a tyrannical government-both foreign and domestic- the brilliant forefathers of this great nation gave Americans the right to bear arms and the government to never infringe on that right. It’s not for hunting, it’s not for sport..it’s for a defense against those that would usurp power for themselves. And now here’s Morgan..an Englishman…telling Americans they’re idiots that they should never expect a government to turn on them and they should tear up the constitution (their “little book), starting with the second amendment. Piers Morgan….the same guy who abused his fellow Brittons’ rights by illegally obtaining information from them. Nice guy huh?
Breitbart-schooled Shapiro put it brilliantly to Morgan…”my grandparents are ashes in Europe because they didn’t believe a government could be usurpatious”. Sanctimonious posturing from Pierre. It’s reassuring to see Andrew “happy warrior” Breitbart has left behind such capable young people to carry on his legacy. They get it..they understand the left and we should learn
Report this comment
Priscilla King
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 1:29pmGo Shapiro!
Report this comment
mrunner
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 3:29pmSo drifting off into a little daydream I thought… “If and when it all breaks down and we need to get about the rebuilding- should Piers be captured and tried for subversion and espionage?” Of course his name would be added to a mental list I have that is growing exponentially!
Report this comment
sacwoodpusher
Posted on January 12, 2013 at 9:12pmThe third ammendment says that soldiers cannot take over our home in times of pease, and can only do so in times of was as described by law.
THIS is the type of tyranny that was imposed on Americans by soldiers of Pier’s country. Deport the ungrateful F’head brit!
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:16amLOL, best quote, “Don’t lump me in with the likes of Alex Jones.” That will be a classic statement!
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:39amPierre called the American constitution “your little book” during this “ambush/lecture/admonishment/publicity milking”. Sensationalist “journalism” from a self-absorbed hack. Piers still can’t seem to grasp the vulgarity of an Englishman – in America no less- denigrating the American constitution and laughing at the purpose of it’s contents.
Pierre seems to believe that governments can never turn on their people..while Bashar Assad carries on daddy’s legacy in Syria as we speak. While knowing that Oliver Cromwell (who had successfully overthrown the British monarchy in a civil war for it’s own tyranny and executed Charles I ) abused the Scots and the Irish. While we all see Morgan in the midst of a scandal himself where he spit on the rights of his fellow Brittons by illegally obtaining information from them.
Breitbart’s Shapiro put it beautifully to Morgan….”my grandparents are ashes in Europe because they didn’t believe a government could be usurpatious”. All Morgan cares about is the publicity he’s getting for his sagging show. I’m sure he’d be doing cartwheels in the studio if another Sandy Hook took place today..”yee hah…whoopee..ratings time”.
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:44amNo different from how the lefties operate everywhere, including on these boards. Smear and inuendo. Shapiro handled it perfectly and you could see Pierre getting his back up about it.
Report this comment
Totally Domestic
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:14amHow DARE that RED COAT to come to this country and try to take our guns a 2nd time!
Get that man OUT OF MY COUNTRY!!
Report this comment
@leftfighter
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:51amYou beat me to my comment.
How dare ME? Left, how dare you?
How dare you call me a baby killer because I volunteered to serve this great nation and never killed anyone not already trying to kill me?
How dare you then turn around and want to take away my ability to own a measure of defense for body and my rights, using the excuse that a handful of nut jobs out of 300 million people went on a murderous rampage when the weapon is only a tool and not at all getting to the root of the problem.
Taking it away will only result in more dead people, as it will likely result in more bombs.
How dare you target and demonize an AR when it is a lower caliber and less power weapon than many pistols (the Desert Eagle comes immediately to mind)?
Finally, how dare you, YES, stand on the graves of children and use big scary words like “assault weapon” to demonize a rifle that millions of peaceful people own WHEM ANYTHING USED AS A WEAPON IN AN ASSAULT IS BY DEFINITION AN ASSAULT WEAPON?
Yes. How dare you?
Report this comment
IMCHRISTIAN
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:13amI don’t listen to Morgan, what did he say about “Fast and Furious”?
Report this comment
Chunkyrhyno
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 4:58pmhey Pierce,,,,go back in kissing your queens booty,,,,,,,oops im sorry she doesnt want you back in the UK also,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,well there’s always Kenya or Egypt or better yet Syria!!!!!!!!!
Report this comment
Daggerandgun777
Posted on January 12, 2013 at 10:40amOr how about the fifty million children yearly aborted by their mothers?
Report this comment
SageInWaiting
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:11amI could take less that 10 seconds of that pompous, arrogant a$$. I refuse to watch his show; why should I give him ANY credibility here? You are playing into his marketing plan for getting his face in the media – nobody watches either his show or network.
Report this comment
...sam
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:35amTRUE….this jackleg has gotten more press over this issue than he deserves….he sucks so bad his own country dont want his dumb a$$ back….
Report this comment
Totally Domestic
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:11amHow dare a RED COAT come over here and try to take away our guns for a 2nd time?
Our Constitution a silly book? GET THIS MAN OUT OF MY COUNTRY!
Report this comment
Totally Domestic
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:52pmOn the night of April 18,1775, Dr Joseph Warren, head of the Boston Committee, sent for his two best express riders, William Dawes and Paul Revere. He told them the British were sending out troops that night. The redcoats were to march to Lexington to arrest John Hancock and Sam Adams, who were staying there. Then they were to go on to Concord to seize the American’s stock of weapons.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:09amWhat is the difference between what this guy is doing to piers morgan and what alex jones did to piers morgan….Only difference is that alex jones was more emotional and assertive. But yet alex jones was demonized all week on the glenn beck radio show…Where is the consistency? Why do we hate some Constitutionalists and like others?
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:18amSOY, If you can’t see the difference, then I am truly concerned for you. Please seek professional help, and no, I am not joking.
Report this comment
Cavallo
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:24amAlex Jones is a looney weirdo a lot of the time. He has some extremely wacked out conspiracy theories and notions that lack sense (outside the realms of fiction novels). His style is exceptionally confrontational, and makes him appear unhinged and borderline psychotic. He also never seems to dress professionally, always with open shirt collar even in professional settings. He comes off more suited to screaming about hellfire and damnation, in the hands of an angry God. This doesn’t mean he is always wrong, that all his ideas are off kilter. The problem is that his style and presentation delivery can have the effect of framing all his ideas as crazy. Compare Shapiro’s appearance to Jones. Tie, coat, professional… credible.. the message.. identical.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:35amWhat alex jones said on the piers morgan show regarding guns was completely correct – tell me where I am wrong. At the very end, all of piers morgan talking points were discredited so he brought up 9/11 conspiracy
Now whether you think something is up with 9/11 or not….What alex jones said during the main portion of that interview was 100% correct. Why do you support Glenn using leftist smear tactics that ignore the content of what he said on that interview?
You are fair weather conservatives. You support only the conservatives you like but you hate the ones that are not in lockstep with you
Report this comment
rickinpa
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:23pmI don’t hate Alex Jones and probably agree with MOST of what he says but when he goes on RANTS like that he’s doing more harm than good – HE ENCOURAGES the left to point at our side and say NUT JOB! Make your point without acting like a phsyco and you’ll do much better!
Report this comment
Fubared
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 2:34pmRJ and Cavallo
Well said, I concur completely. You don’t have to appear rabid to convey a stance or doctrine. Soy, perhaps, maybe, could be why some shied away from the Paul supporters- take Bro Smith for example, or old Individualism- both get old real fast with the rabid crap, and the message suffered because of it. I would rather read a Soy post than a Bro Smitty any day. Capiche?
Report this comment
00100111
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 3:25pmAlex Jones is not a constitutionalist.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 3:34pm@00100111
Then neither is glenn beck
Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 4:18pmSOY if you can’t see why Pierre invited Jones onto his sagging show you’re a fool.
It was intentional and tailored for a number things..none of them to address this debate in a credible way. Jones was invited on because of his incidiary rhetoric and his outrageous style. This was so that the “moderate” viewer of CNN could see the “rabid” gun owner advocate and instill in his head that all gun owners must be like Jones…therefore, we need to do what Pierre says. The other of course as a business move. Pierre’s show is falling faster than MONICNE’s apron belly. So he’s riding high on all the controversy..the petitions to remove him from the country, the “your an idiot” remarks, etc. Pierre is salivating for another Sandy Hook incident.
Shapiro nailed him and you could see Pierre didn’t like it when he said that Pierre is standing on the graves of the children. What foundation does Pierre have to talk about what rights Americans should have after he defecated on his fellow Brittons’ rights by obtaining information from them illegally?
Jones was on his show to make gun owners look like rabid, unhinged zealots. Start understanding the lefty mind..they use images not facts to influence minds. This is why Obama is using Dr King’s bible for his second inauguration. Or why Obama had lab coats handed out to medical workers during the Obamacare photo ops. This is classic Soviet style manipulation and lefties lap it up like hyenas.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 6:44pm@AvengerK
It is one thing for you to disagree with Alex Jones delivery or strategy….It is a whole other thing for glenn beck to use alinsky smear tactics and tear him down because of the emotions he has shown. Alex Jones brought facts to the interview and referenced them over and over. Glenn beck did everyone a disservice and took the side of Piers morgan….pathetic from glenn beck
Report this comment
SHASTADIANE1
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:08amAgain, the same old “assault weapons” description. Shapiro should know, and should have been able to combat Morgan with the fact that an AR15 is NOT an assault weapon!! They use the term to demonize a weapon that is simply a rifle in black paint. It is a semi-automatic. Assault weapons are already banned. People get your terms right and your message out there. Make sure you know of what you speak, before you go on these shows and show your ignorance even as much as the ones pushing the gun control agenda. We are better than them, we have the Constitution on our side.
Report this comment
HYPNOTOAD
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 1:50pmYes, you are so very correct. I can’t seem to get this fact through to even most conservatives let alone the gun hating leftists. When morgan tried his “bully” tactic yet again about “what gun was used at all these mass shootings”, Ben should have said “a non banned legally obtained weapon was used”.
Report this comment
ltb
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:08amBen Shapiro is brilliant and Pierce Morgan is a mental midget next to him.
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:06amIt is beginning to feel like the world is filled with parrot-zombies . The total media control is frighteningly like some science fiction movie , a James Bond movie where an unknown director is pulling the strings , or just a terrible nightmare.
Report this comment
BlackCrow
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:04amThis Brit has no clue. He thinks New York City and Los Angles are typical of the United States. Set him down n the middle of Kansas and he would go stark raving mad inside a week just like the vast majority of those urban sewer rats would.
Report this comment
dcgirl
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:18pmHe already IS stark raving mad :-)
Report this comment
Eric Window
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:42pmI think you have hit the nail on the head. Big city life is very different than main stream America. The problems are different, yet they believe in broad-brush solutions. Hence why our political map is mainly “blue” in the urban areas only. This Brit has no clue what rural or small city life is like.
Report this comment
self-reliant man
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 5:07pmEven in Kansas, there are liberal hotspots. Think Lawrence.
Report this comment
harleyman
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 10:04pmSend Piers to SC and see how we take care of him. No, he’ll keep himself safe in his little Liberal safe house.
Report this comment
American_Made
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:03amGet everyone you know to call CNN advertisers and tell them as long as they run adds on CNN that you will not buy their products and will convince your friends to to the same. Just like the stinking liberals did with Glen Beck.
Report this comment
Cavallo
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:03amThe mall shooting guy’s gun jammed. James Holmes firearm jammed. James Holmes did his work with a shotgun. Piers is a fascist. They all want tyrannical autocratic control of the society, and that can only be accomplished when the ability to resist is eliminated from the individual. The National Socialists weren’t eliminated in the 1940s. They just changed their titles to Democrats, Liberals, and Leftists.
Report this comment
jcldwl
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:03amGood for this guy and he should have told Piers there is no such thing as an assault rifle it is a made up term created by the leftist of this country. Also the word is the Sandy Hook killer didn’t even use the rifle just handguns. Don’t know if there is any actual confirmation on that. The Aurora killer used a shot gun hence the reason for multiple gun shot wounds oh and didn’t he also use some explosive devices that injured people smoke grenades or something like that? The report was he left his rifle in his car. Is that still the case or have they changed that too. The only true assault weapon in the country is the regime and their media constantly assaulting our intelligence. Let’s ban them.
Report this comment
GONE_SOVEREIGN
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:06pmJCL: You are correct about the killings in Sandy Hook. On Hannity last night Megan Kelly and Juan F’n Williams were discussing the killings. Sean asked Juan what would be his suggestion to prevent killings like this from happening, of course Juan said to ban assault rifles. Megan said, banning assault rifles would NOT have prevented the killings because the children were not killed by an assault rifle, it was found in the trunk of the vehicle that Adam Lanza was driving. I’m not doubting that fact, but my question is why was the media saying that there were .223 casings everywhere and the children died from .223? If Adam didn’t even shoot his moms AR then who in the hell shot those kids WITH a .223?? This story smells as fishy as F&F and Benghazi.
Report this comment
SpankDaMonkey
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:01am.
Democrat’s are always “standing on the graves of DEAD children”……
They after all Abort them all the time, not to mention commit all of the Mass Shootings…..
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:10amSpank: Think you are forgetting about that Norwegian male nutcase a few years back. Crazy people are universal. Unfortunately.
Report this comment
silvermike
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 10:58amTyranny will be accomplished by executive order. Shapiro is exactly right. Why is congress and the president seeking to eliminate military style rifles? These “assault rifles” are less of a common factor than Ritalin, violent video games, gun free zones or clear mental illness but those factors are not a threat to those in power. Surely the founding fathers could have never imagined a day when the 3 branches of government and the press would conspire to seize power. So why did the founders put firearms as a god given right that government’s duty is to protect?
Report this comment
ExposeGannett
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 10:50amSo, the folks at Wordpress have come under fire and suspended our blog there (http://exposegannett.wordpress.com)…we are no longer (for now) able to post new information there, however, you can still find the information at our mirror site, (http://exposegannett.blogspot.com/)
So head over and check out the contact info for hackjob fake “journalists”
Report this comment
strawberry411a
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 10:53amTypical liberal. Disagree: homophobe racist sexist blahblah blah..
Report this comment
Detroit paperboy
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 10:46amAs far as I’m concerned, the federal government is nothing more than a criminal enterprise…….we are watching a socialist takeover of America , and they are using our grandkids money to fund it…
Report this comment
SquidVetOhio
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 10:42amThis kid is my new hero.
Report this comment
braddock66
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:21amWow This kid kicked his foreign,liberal,socialist,democratic leaning, Marxist lover a** all over the place!
Love America baby. The Never dying truth of liberty.
Report this comment
USA5
Posted on January 12, 2013 at 3:06pmThis Kid represents the real Hope in our USA youth. He will inspire many more.
Ben brought a book of USA Constitution
Morgan brought drugs
Ben is my hero
Report this comment
Zcat
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 10:41amNote that Mr. Morgan fails to take account of gun crime in the UK, only gun deaths. If he did, his argument would lose steam. Since the gun ban in 1998, the total number of firearm offences in England and Wales has risen by 89%, and in some areas of the country has leapt by as much as 500%. Gang culture once never seen in the UK is now rife — disproving the notion that banning guns will weed out gang culture
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/01/im_british_and_piers_morgan_is_damn_wrong.html#ixzz2HgLfGjMU
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
Report this comment
justangry
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 10:40amYeah this Brietbart dillhole ticked me off. Saying we might someday experience a tyrannical regime. Why doesn’t anyone enlightened the bloody wanker on the abuses to our rights already committed by the past two regimes? The NDAA is tyrannical enough to warrant suspicion of this government. Of course CNN didn’t enlightened it’s viewers that they no longer have a RIGHT to due process in the first place. In other words, rights we’ve enjoyed since the middle ages have been wiped out quietly in the defense spending bill. Anyone trusting this government is a fool.
Report this comment
The-Monk
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 10:45amHi Justangry,
What browser are you using? TIA
Report this comment
justangry
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:20am@monk, I’m using what you recommended.
Report this comment
ibanrfknm
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 2:09pmI’ll second that
Report this comment