Developing: Pakistani Plane Escorted by UK Fighter Jets — 2 Men Arrested

Doc Thompson’s 24-hour radio marathon, ‘#24forok,’ continues until 9 am ET — Listen Live!

Government

‘Paranoid, Sick, Twisted’: MSNBC’s Scarborough Unleashes on NRA, Gun Makers & Survivalists in Fiery Diatribe

Jan. 11, 2013 11:15am Billy Hallowell

MSNBCs Joe Scarborough Unleashes on NRA, Gun Manufacturers & Survivalists

Photo Credit: MSNBC

Gun control continues to dominate discussions about U.S. domestic policy, as talking heads and politicians, alike, regularly sound off about the monumentally-divisive issue. Among those making his voice heard on the matter is former GOP congressman and MSNBC host Joe Scarborough, who recently noted that his former views on guns have been forever altered by what unfolded at Sandy Hook.

Building on his proclamation that he has become less favorable toward the availability of certain firearms, the “Morning Joe” host followed up this morning with an attack on the National Rifle Association (NRA), gun manufacturers and survivalists While discussing the prominent gun organization, Scarborough accused the group of telling untruths in an effort to spawn fear.

The host said that the NRA is playing upon peoples’ fears in an effort to create angst and bolster its members’ profits and standing. In making his points, Scarborough said that Republicans need to pick their fights more wisely, especially when it comes to gun regulations.

“This is not, for the NRA, about Second Amendment rights,” Scarborough said, going on to issue the following diatribe (as per Mediaite):

“This is about gun manufacturers making millions and millions and millions of dollars. This is about retailers making millions and millions and millions of dollars. Do you know how much money these people have made over the slaughter of 20 innocents in Newtown? Do you know how much richer these rich gun manufacturers have gotten over the past month, and how the NRA uses that tragedy to gin up fears, and websites use that tragedy to gin up fears that they’re coming to take your guns away?”

As for survivalist Americans who believe that the government is intent on taking and confiscating weapons from the public, Scarborough dismissed their take on the issue as a “paranoid, sick, twisted view.”

Watch his controversial comments, below:

(H/T: Mediaite)

–

Related:

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (126)

Canada_Goose
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:42am
Hey all you paranoid delusional gun owners out there. The POTUS cannot ban assault weapons, or high capacity magazines, or even implements across the board background checks by executive order. All these would require an act of congress.

All that the president can do is basically limited to a few tweaks of the current law:

Here are the three which have been suggested:

Directing the DOJ to prosecute more “prohibited purchasers” when they attempt to buy guns. In 2009, the FBI referred 71,000 cases of these buyers, mostly felons. U.S. attorneys prosecuted only 77 cases.

Appointing a permanent ATF director. The ATF has spooked the right ever since Ruby Ridge and the Senate hasn’t confirmed a permanent director since 2006.

Requiring federal agencies to report mental health records. The NICS Improvement Act of 2007, passed after the Virginia Tech shootings, requires this. It hardly ever happens.

Wow amazing what hysteria a Drudge Report headline can cause.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- GhostOfJefferson
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:53am
  Your message fails when framed in ad hominem. You should perhaps learn civil communication, or your message will not be heard.
  
  That said, what they say and what they do are two entirely different things in reality. With luck, this is over-reaction. I hope it is. If not, then there’s no need to sugar coat calls to not comply.
  
  Report this comment
- afishfarted
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:58am
  It woul appear you’ve chosen the correct avitar. Obama can not direct his AG to ignore laws passed by congress. Yet he did with the Defense of Marriage Act. He can not reform or create immigration laws unilaterally. Yet he did with an E.O. There are many many things that the Executive Branch is not constittuionally allowed to do, yet he does it anyway. So for you to believe he won’t issue an E.O. to tweak American’s rights uner the Second Amendment is–ummm–Dudly Doright-ish.
  Now go find Nell. She was seen sneakin’ over to Snidley’s place
  
  Report this comment
- Uechi
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:03pm
  Hey weenie you left out using the EPA or DOT or some other agency to exact a large tax on the shipment or sale of ammunition and components., He could effectively disarm Americans by making ammo scarce and too expensive for most people to purchase. Wake Up!
  
  Report this comment
- RedHarley
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:08pm
  Hey all you paranoid delusionals………
  The president cannot by executive order or through his agencies change immigration policy……..
  The president through executive order or through his agencies cannot disregard the first amendment and force religious organizations to violate their beliefs……
  The president cannot make recess appointments when the Senate is not in recess…….
  The president cannot violate the 5th amendment and kill a U.S. citizen without due process…….
  The president and his Justice department cannot refuse to defend the law of the land like the Defense of Marriage Act.
  
  What’s that ?? He already did all of those things, and more ???
  Wow.
  I guess he really doesn’t care about what he “can” or “can’t” do
  
  I never did care much for Canadian Geese…….they leave a mess wherever they go because they are FoS.
  
  Report this comment
- Dano.50
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:12pm
  It appears to me, that its the libs and your side who are the paranoid delusionals because you’re the ones freaking out about law abiding gun owners coming to kill them.
  
  The FBI stats themselves show such crimes as Sandy Point are down by 50% and until somebody can come up with a way to predict the future, such acts are never going to be 100% eliminated.
  
  And as far as having an armed population, I’ve been to Switzerland. A friend of mine lives there and is married to a Swiss woman and she’s darn proud of the fact that Switzerland has one of the lowest crime rates in the world. And everybody there knows this because half the people are armed.
  
  Every Swiss male, (Maybe the women now too) have to do two years in the army, maintain reserve status and train a couple weeks a year. They also MUST keep a functional machine gun, two loaded clips, and be read in 30 minutes to go to war.
  
  When Hitler insinuated to the Swiss king?, “If I decided to go through your country what’s to stop me?” the king said, “Inside an hour I will have an army of over a million.”
  
  Unless things have changed in the past decade, the local saying was, “Switzerland doesn’t have an army. Switzerland IS an army.”
  
  Report this comment
- Gold Coin & Economic News
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:13pm
  I just hope Congress will be willing to do their job and impeach Obama if he tries to subvert the Constitution:
  http://www.isthatbaloney.com/president-obama-to-use-executive-orders-to-destroy-the-2nd-amendment/
  
  Report this comment
- SiVisPacemParaBellum
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:14pm
  You know he has already changed the welfare law so those that are on it don’t have to be looking for work, and immigration basically enacting the dream act all with out congress….
  
  Report this comment
- jakartaman
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:14pm
  What a big thinker!
  My AR-15′s and .223 ammo is to overthrow an overreaching tyrannical Government not to hunt with.
  Our fore fathers hand the smarts to have a 2nd amendment – so we could do what we will need to do – And Joe you will not like it – nor Joey/Barry.
  What part of DO NOT INFRINGE escapes your little mind!
  
  Report this comment
- BODYBAG
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:15pm
  @REDHARLEY
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:08pm
  I never did care much for Canadian Geese…….they leave a mess wherever they go because they are FoS.
  —————————————-
  There’s an AR-15 in your future. LOL
  
  Report this comment
- brother_ed
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:24pm
  @CANADA_GOOSE
  
  It is the Unmentionable One and his regime that is ginning up the fear with all of their tough talk about restricting access to firearms, which access is protected by the 2nd amendment.
  
  Everything this regime does is calculated to divide.
  
  Report this comment
- gundylan
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:28pm
  What good is a gun when you cannot buy the ammo? Thats what he will end up going for. You might be able to buy some for hunting but they will either come with a high tax or you will only be able to buy a certain amount per year and then you will most likely have to turn in your shell casings much like the old glass soda bottles.
  
  Report this comment
- jcldwl
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:48pm
  @ canada
  You need to study history. This current regime pushed through health care illegally. They have an agenda to destroy our current system and build a new communist regime. Pure and simple. They cannot move forward with their agenda without taking our guns from us. Why do you think they are only focused on what they term assault rifles? They don’t care about handguns, they don’t care about shotguns, or hunting rifles. Why? because they would not offer much resistance. Stalin took guns, people died, Hitler took guns, people died, Mao took guns people died. Need I say more. But then why do you care you are apparently Canadian or in love with Canada so my advice to you is stay out of our business. It’s our Constitution not Canada’s.
  
  Report this comment
- 000degrees
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 1:00pm
  OK joe….I’m stupid,,,,,,,but I will remain a free man and armed.
  
  Report this comment
- jd9215
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 1:52pm
  @REDHARLEY Not all of us Canadians are full of s**t. Just the ones east of the Saskatchewan/Manitoba border.
  
  Report this comment
- pookieamos
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 1:55pm
  It’s stunningly amazing that so many Americans are blind to the tyrannical regime in the White House ! Are you plain ignorant or willfully blind ?? Its breathtakingly visible the numerous attacks on the Constitution . Do you really believe this cultist Hitler wanna-be cares he doesn’t have this authority ? Obama has done whatever he damn well pleases , he could care less about the SEPERATION of Powers , he could care less about hs limited authority and he could care less about ******* all over our Bill of Rights !
  
  Report this comment
- brother_ed
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 2:00pm
  @JCLDWL
  
  “Why do you think they are only focused on what they term assault rifles? They don’t care about handguns, they don’t care about shotguns, or hunting rifles. Why? because they would not offer much resistance.”
  —————————————————————————————————————————————————
  
  Excellent point!!
  
  I hadn’t connected those dots.
  
  I was just thinking that it would be easier to ban ‘scary looking’ rifles and then move on to small arms, but I think your point is more valid.
  
  Thanks!
  
  Report this comment
- The-Monk
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 2:52pm
  Test…
  
  Report this comment
- Diane TX
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 2:59pm
  @ THE MONK
  
  Hi Monk, I received an email from The Blaze about 20 minutes ago. They are aware of the 404 Page Not Found error and they said they are working on it. :)
  
  Report this comment
- John.Galt
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 3:15pm
  @Canada – I suggest you stay in Canada, freedom is disappearing here fast.
  
  Well Obama cannot write an executive order to waive a law either, but he did. He granted states waivers from the welfare reform act, so states no longer have to require people to work or even look for work when on welfare. That is a LAW that obama negated by executive order, which is unconstitutional! Of course there is the irony that his admin sold “ASSAULT RIFLES” TO MEXICAN DRUG LORDS, WHICH RESULTED IN HUNDREDS OF DEATHS, BUT WHO CARES SINCE IT WAS MOSTLY MEXICANS THAT DIED, RIGHT?
  
  What you fail to understand is that the President can get away with ANYTHING THE PEOPLE WILL PUT UP WITH.
  
  Imagine all the great stories (scandals) the media would have if Obama was a Republican!
  
  Report this comment
- Canada_Goose
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 3:25pm
  Immigration:
  
  DHS’ Exercise Of Prosecutorial Discretion Is Perfectly Consistent With Current Law
  Prosecutorial discretion is the authority of an agency charged with enforcing a law to decide whether to enforce, or not to enforce, the law against someone. The exercise of discretion is central to American law enforcement and upholding the rule of law. All law enforcement agencies, including those that enforce immigration laws, have the authority to decide who within their jurisdictions to investigate, arrest, detain charge, and prosecute. When it comes to immigration law, the exercise of prosecutorial discretion not only conserves limited enforcement resources, but also protects core
  American values of humanitarianism and fairness.]
  
  Immigration Authorities Have Been Using Prosecutorial Discretion To Stop Deportation Proceedings For More Than 30 Years. In a 2009 article, Penn State law professor Shaba Sivaprasad Wadhia stated that in the immigration context, “The use of prosecutorial discretion … was revealed by INS in 1975 as a consequence of a lawsuit involving John Lennon and Yoko Ono.” Wadhia added that before 1975, prosecutorial discretion “was a secret operation of the INS.” [The Role of Prosecutorial Discretion in Immigration Law, Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal, 9/21/09]
  
  Report this comment
- Techcon
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:50pm
  @canada_noose,
  
  Wow, if Obama did just that, the Left would freak out! How bold–enforce current law. As for including mental health records in background checks, that works so well when a Mom buys the guns for her nut, doesn’t it? Obama doesn’t give one damn about the Constitution, anyway.
  
  About Scar-boy-o…
  
  If believing someone would confiscate guns is, as Scar-boy-o said, “…paranoid, sick, twisted…” Then anybody who signs an executive order to confiscate guns is, “paranoid, sick, and twisted,” right?
  
  Report this comment
- Sgtjim
  Posted on January 12, 2013 at 11:48am
  Hey Goose Prez Obama can’t force us to buy health insurance. Make Religious groups pay for abortions and birth control and probably eventually sex changes. Or raise the debt limit without congress. But he has or is trying to.
  He just signed a bill to get free armed security for life. Why would would he do that? I think he is going to try banning and confiscating guns and feels he is going to need it.
  
  Report this comment
- steelpanther
  Posted on January 12, 2013 at 4:51pm
  jcldwl, hate to break it to you, but you can find bigger and better guns on the civilian market then you will find in the military. Just go look at why the .458 SOCOM round was made, oh right, because of the NUMEROUS complaints from soldiers that it takes several shots with a .223 to take a person down.
  
  They may not hold as much ammo, but you can easily find good rifles that will out shoot any of these so called assault rifles any day of the week and you kill the guys carrying them before they ever get into range with their guns.
  
  No, they are after Assault rifles because people have had it drilled in to them that they are exceptionally deadly weapons that have no use other then war. What’s funny is the military isn’t out to kill the enemy, a dead soldier is one less combatant out of the fight, a wounded soldier takes 3 men out of the fight. The wounded and the two guys needed to carry him off the field. They are the easier target, after that, they will be after hand guns, because what good are they other then for killing people, etc etc etc. They are only going to be stopped when it is made clear they will never win.
  
  Report this comment
- dmerwin
  Posted on January 13, 2013 at 9:51am
  Note to Joe
  Do you know how many semi-automatic rifles have been sold since December 15? I don’t, but I do know that they are getting hard to find locally, same as ammo. People like Scarborough, Feinstein, Cuomo and Obama are the best salesmen the gun industry ever had.
  
  Report this comment
- dmerwin
  Posted on January 13, 2013 at 9:52am
  Your assertion that he can’t use an executive order hasn’t stopped him from doing it before.
  
  Report this comment
stopprintn
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:42am
Time to protest major league baseball, because bats kill more than rifles. Ban Assault Bats Now!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- GeorgieJo
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:56am
  JOEY SCAR is SCARY
  Has he taken his meds?
  Sitting next to MeekaCheeka has made his brain into jello.
  
  Report this comment
- The-Monk
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 2:55pm
  Testing….
  
  Report this comment
Gold Coin & Economic News
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:40am
How does Joe Scab know that this shooter didn’t have access to an “assault weapon” but chose a shotgun instead? How does Joe Scab know that gang members get their guns at gun shows? He doesn’t! How does Joe Scab even begin to call himself a Republican? He’s a freakin RINO!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- afishfarted
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:51am
  At this stage of the game, the left–or RINO’s–don’t care about the truth or fact finding. Their goal is to ramp up the discussion based on irrational emotion. It’s pathetic. Their intent is to speak loud and inflamatory words to make themselves sound “holier than thou” while they demonize the lawful gun owner–or in this case the lawful and moral means to make a profit.
  And the sad truth is, there has been a growing segment of the American population who have no idea what the term “critical thinking” is. They watch too much Jerry Springer
  
  Report this comment
DougHuffman
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:40am
The money made was further economic stimulus by the Obummer administration by their macabre dance in the blood of innocents.

Good people are armed with wits and guns and the Truth. MOLON LABE

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- jeffp605
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:55pm
  Yeah let’s talk about people making money off of Newtown’s death’s MSNBC , i’m sure you guys haven’t made a penny right ?
  
  Report this comment
OUTLAW_WEALTH
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:38am
What it’s really, really about:

It’s about a CIA coup which assassinated JFK
It’s about a CIA black operation to alter America’s attitudes towards guns
It’s about powermongers in high places seeking subjugate American autonomy.
It’s about high crimes and felonies, murders, and black deeds of the most malignant sort.
It’s about sacrificing children for political power
It’s about deception and indoctrination
It’s about leftist idiots, useful and otherwise
It’s about the few, the proud, the individual Americans who stand for truth, justice, liberty, and the American way. And we won’t be taken down.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- katzkiner
  Posted on January 12, 2013 at 12:30am
  It is about subjugation the country before Americans discover they have 3 x the oil than is in the entire Middle East. Regime change will always follow HUGE discoveries of natual resources. Free trade has already looted our industries. The Constitution stands in the way of the thieves. We are the richest country on the planet and they have you believing we are destitute. FIGHT by any means necessary.
  
  Report this comment
MattStains
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:38am
Add your comments

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
BODYBAG
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:37am
Blow me Joe.

“Do you know how much money these people have made over the slaughter of 20 innocents in Newtown? Do you know how much richer these rich gun manufacturers have gotten over the past month, and how the NRA uses that tragedy to gin up fears, and websites use that tragedy to gin up fears that they’re coming to take your guns away?”

Unless I am mistaken, the shooting happened, Progs seized on the event for gun control like buzzards to a dead carcass and citizens reacted by purchasing weapons. Seems to me that PROGS are the ones who flagrantly capitalized on the event for political purposes.

Everything else is pure capitalism —- company makes product, consumers purchase product.

As long as needle —-s like Joe Blow are associated with “GOP” —- I wont be. He’s a disgrace to your heritage & legacy.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- DougHuffman
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 1:24pm
  The NRA is Good-cop to Brady’s bad-cop while both profit from their ‘members’ stupidity. The Emperor NRA has no clothes. NRAWOL.org
  
  Report this comment
WillG
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:37am
I believe it is He that has the twisted view. The ruination of our once Great Nation is unfolding before the eyes of those of us willing to keep ours open.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
gary2658
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:36am
Gangs don’t go to the gun shows and buy guns they get them from the government. (Fast & Furious)

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
AxelPhantom
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:36am
No Joe, “we” sick twisted people know they don’t work that way. They cannot confiscate guns until they want a civil war. They incrementally achieve the same goal by taxing the snot out of something, put restrictions on the import or manufactures or the parts necessary to operate the thing. A gun without ammo is a club. A gun that costs $25,000 to own, puts it out of most people’s reach. In both cases you have removed the ability of the common man to own the firearm……..THAT is how they work Joe and it is people like you who incrementally accept their “moderate” blather that perpetuates the slide down the mountain.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Longgonegator
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:35am
Little Joe and Piers Limey Morgan are the ones making money off the tragedy – they need something for their terrible ratings – so they stir it til it stinks

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- walnutportconservative
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:39am
  What Longgonetor calls “stirring up” could also be called, confusing things in a chaotic way.
  Who is the great deceiver? You now know what side Piers is on.
  
  Report this comment
- Cavallo
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:47am
  I can promise you that several news producers wet their pants in excitement that 20 kids got killed and they could milk that tragedy for weeks for ratings. Look, Joe is STILL trying to do it. They wanted every single tear shed by a broken mother, a sister, to be intimately redistributed over and over in high definition. They didn’t just want to tug on the heart strings of suburban mothers and families who have cable, they wanted to yank hard, hook those strings to a drag racer and floor it. It has been a long standing cliche that journalists are cold hearted, twisted psychopaths just salivating for the next tragedy that they can exploit .. because it is true.
  
  Report this comment
gary2658
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:33am
Gangs don’t buy guns the government gives them the guns. (Fast & Furious)

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
SGinNC
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:30am
He claims that the NRA is playing on people’s fears?!!! The fact that he can keep a straight face while stating this is truly amazing! Exactly who is playing on people’s fears here?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Tri-ox
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:30am
What do you expect from a flaming liberal like Scarborough? Scarborough is nothing but a paid obama propagandist – reading the script handed to him by the White House.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/in-campaign-for-tougher-gun-laws-obama-and-allies-work-to-tilt-public-opinion/2013/01/09/64b07be0-5a8c-11e2-9fa9-5fbdc9530eb9_story.html

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
IMCHRISTIAN
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:30am
They can’t enforce the borders so how can they ever protect all people at all times. They did break the law didn’t they?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
POLE AM1
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:29am
I can’t stand to listen to him all the way through the video,what an IDIOT!!!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
JonSigMan
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:29am
Two words for you Joe-Joe…..and they ain’t “Good Day”.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
SpankDaMonkey
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:28am
.
Do you know how much money these people have made over the slaughter of 20 innocents in Newtown?

Yes I do, Millions. And that is the direct result of morons like you Joe…..

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- BHOHG2G
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 2:48pm
  If it bleeds, it leads.
  
  Report this comment
AmericanStrega
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:28am
So if guns are banned what will stop the government from banning the first amendment, Joe? What will you do when you’re told you cannot have an opinion that isn’t ok’d by the government? Who will stand up for what was once your right to Freedom of Speech? Sorry, guess people like you cannot think that far ahead. More the fool you.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- BHOHG2G
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 2:50pm
  That’s right.
  The 2nd is the key to the rest.
  
  Report this comment
hauschild
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:27am
Typical rant from your average, head-in-the-sand progressive.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- EVANROOD
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:05pm
  I believe that he was merely trying to make amends for being mean to Mika yesterday! Ya know, get back in the good graces with management.
  
  Report this comment
IMCHRISTIAN
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:27am
They can’t enforce the borders from illegals so how could they protect everybody at all the time. Laws are broken there too aren’t they?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Dismayed Veteran
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:25am
There are simply too many stories about gun control. I have run out of comments except this:

THIS IS MY RIFLE. There are many like it but this one is mine. My rifle is my best friend. It is my life. I must master it as I master my life. My rifle, without me is useless. Without my rifle, I am useless. I must fire my rifle true. I must shoot straighter than any enemy who is trying to kill me. I must shoot him before he shoots me. I will….

My rifle and myself know that what counts in this war is not the rounds we fire, the noise of our burst, nor the smoke we make. We know that it is the hits that count. We will hit…

My rifle is human, even as I, because it is my life. Thus, I will learn it as a brother. I will learn its weakness, its strength, its parts, its accessories, its sights and its barrel. I will keep my rifle clean and ready, even as I am clean and ready. We will become part of each other. We will…

Before God I swear this creed. My rifle and myself are the defenders of my country. We are the masters of our enemy. We are the saviors of my life. So be it, until victory is America’s and there is no enemy, but Peace

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
nostromo
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:20am
Hey, politicans like Cuomo have already stated that confiscation should be on the table. Am I not to take him at his word?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Cavallo
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:31am
  Iowa state legislators are demanding it, the Illinois democrats tried to introduce legislation to the effect. Prominent lawmakers all over the country and leftist fascist sycophants are all calling for confiscation. This douche Joe Scarborough either has his head in the sand or is simply a propagandist for the autocrats.
  
  Report this comment
ferggie
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:18am
I guess since Obama and Biden believe Executive Order can be used to override the Constitution then I guess the next president can outlaw Homosexuality based on health concerns through the distribution of STD’s. Outlaw abortion relating it to the murder of 1.2 million children every year. Sorry liberals your leader is in the process of screwing you big time. Send him and the rest of the democrats a thank you note.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- biohazard23
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:27am
  He’s screwing them alright. He didn’t even have to bother buying them dinner or giving the obligatory reach-around first, either.
  
  Report this comment
- Cavallo
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:28am
  That only happens after complete autocratic control is gained. Just like the National Socialists of Germany did. Their base organization in the early part was commanded and lead by homosexuals that were eliminated after Adolf grabbed control. Until then, they are useful tools to further the goals of the State.
  
  Report this comment
- Jive Mickey
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:43am
  “Page Not Found?”
  
  Report this comment
- ConstitunalAmerican
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 2:04pm
  And maybe medical scissors used in abortions should be banned since it kills millions of “unborn babies.” Shut down the manufacturer of these scissors to eliminate slaughter.
  
  Report this comment
justangry
Posted on January 11, 2013 at 11:18am
But bombing kids, secret kill lists, whacking American citizens with drones and without due process (as long as it’s not a Republican that’s doing it) is perfectly acceptable. Marxists have issues with consistency.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- GhostOfJefferson
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:03pm
  Exactly my point. If…IF…my post shows up after the 404 I keep getting, that’s precisely what I’ve noted as well.
  
  Report this comment
- AmericanStrega
  Posted on January 11, 2013 at 12:37pm
  This is for Ghost:
  I cannot progress to the “next page” because of the 404. What’s up with that? Any ideas?
  
  Report this comment

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.