NRA Blasts ‘Elitist’, ‘Hypocrite’ Obama in Scathing New Video
The National Rifle Association on Tuesday provided TheBlaze an exclusive look at its new video, which criticizes President Barack Obama’s opposition to having armed guards in more schools across the United States. The gun rights organization refers to the commander-in-chief as a “hypocrite” and an “elitist” in the scathing production.
Noting that Obama’s children are protected by armed guards at their school, the video asks: “Are the president’s kids more important than yours?”
“Mr. Obama demands the wealthy pay their fair share of taxes, but he’s just another elitist hypocrite when it comes to a fair share of security,” the video adds.
“Protection for their kids and gun free zones for ours,” the video concludes.
Watch the video, provided exclusively to TheBlaze by the NRA, below:
An NRA spokesperson told TheBlaze via email that the organization will also release a series of videos in addition to the one above following a statement later today. Visit NRAStandAndFight.com for more information.
Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.


















































































































Comments (315)
Hunter44
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:47pmI also find it hard to understand how people see Odumba as anything good. I do not see him as a leader in any way. And no I didn’t vote for him. If armed guards are good for his kids it’s even better for mine. We have let our ELECTED leaders get a little too big for their britches.
I will be contacting my reps. and let them know that their action on these issues will reflect in my voting. Only when we decide to band together and quit letting them push us around will anything change.
Report this comment
Raging_Waters
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:06pmWhat we need is a dramatic increase in well equipped, well organized civilian militia nationwide….
Report this comment
BODYBAG
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:13pm@RAGING_WATERS
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:06pm
What we need is a dramatic increase in well equipped, well organized civilian militia nationwide….
—————————–
Here, here. I second that motion.
Extreme, radical, fanatical adherents of The US CONSTITUTION and our Founding Principles who are ARMED TO THE TEETH.
[may as well go ahead and start using the adjectives now because the left will use them anyway]
Report this comment
PA PATRIOT
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:14pmJust paid my dues to the NRA for the next three years.
Got a free pocket knife too! :)
Report this comment
Oath-keeper
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:19pmFor all the schist talkers who want to act tough, if you truly care about your individual freedoms please click here or copy and paste freedomdonations.com/amsovpac/gad/?a=1170-asp. Do not know how to make it link up but this is your easiest chance to actually do something NOW. Please sign the fax and have it sent to every single representative in DC. Or STFU. I’m tired of reading all of the cool founding father quotes and posts stating how many weapons one owns. Do something you have until Tomorrow before the King imposes his illegal EO. Oath keepers.org
Report this comment
Oath-keeper
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:23pmfreedom donations.com.
Report this comment
Gold Coin & Economic News
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:24pmGood for the NRA for showing what utter hypocrites we are dealing with. But Obama and company probably don’t care because they have their agenda and marching orders. Here come the executive orders:
http://www.isthatbaloney.com/obama-going-after-2nd-amendment-with-19-executive-orders/
Report this comment
BlackCrow
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:31pmThat guy couldn’t lead water down hill.
Report this comment
CathyvanDyke
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:57pmIt is outright hypocrisy when you consider the current attempt by the Obama Administration to disarm and leave Americans defenceless through gun control legislation while at the same time when it comes to themselves the Democrat elite reconized that gun control may not be a deterrent to those bent on a mission of wrongdoing.
Jan 10, 2:20 PM EST
Obama signs protection bill for former presidents
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama has signed into law a bill granting lifetime Secret Service protection to former presidents and their wives. ….
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_PRESIDENTIAL_PROTECTION?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Report this comment
graceunderfire
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 8:02pm@ Raging Waters
Not only do I agree with you…I have walked into several gun shops in my area that are packed with first time buyers. People are really starting to open their eyes, at least I hope so.
Report this comment
3-Blue
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 8:34pmConcerned about your natural born gun rights being stolen along with your other freedoms? Be at your local state capitol on January 19th @ high noon! It’s a country wide protest aimed at sending the corrupt powers that be a message that we will not allow our rights and our guns to be taken from us in any way whatsoever!!!
It’s a family affair. Bring everybody! The more the better! Bring your signs, be respectful, dress well and don’t give the Socialist media anything they can use for their propaganda. Because they will if they can! This is war people! It ain’t hot yet and we need to prevent it from becoming so by retaining our God given freedom and rights! Strength is the best deterrent! FLOOD THE CAPITOLS so they can’t ignore us!
Organizer: http://www.guncontrolmorecrime.com/
More information: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUAfft7l4wQ
Report this comment
For my Liberty!
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 8:38pmWhat we need is a DRAMATIC DECREASE in Career politicians!
Report this comment
desertspeaks
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 9:02pmbo is a divisive, lying, racist, what more needs to be said
Report this comment
honeydijon13
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 9:14pmI’m sure terrorists are plotting to kidnap your chimps as we speak.
Do you people take stupid pills?
Report this comment
LadyGOP
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 9:16pmI support armed guards in the schools. ^One third^ of the schools across the country already have them.
Its not a crazy idea. They are protecting our country’s most valuable asset.
Report this comment
SendTheMeteors
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 9:24pmWow. The NRA leadership – as opposed to NRA membership – is following the Tea Party example of appealing to their hard core members, from the ignorant to the slightly crazy to the batshoot nuts, instead of appealing to average Americans.
First you have your NRA spokesman, Wayne LaPierre, angrily trying to explain how guns have nothing to do with gun crime. Then you have the NRA introducing a new iPhone app that simulates killing vaguely human like targets. Awesome. And they say how much they don’t want the mentally ill or criminals to have guns, and at the same time oppose letting private vendors sell gun privately or through gun shows sell to whomever has the cash (which is, I believe, 40% of gun sales).
And now? The NRA is saying it’s hypocritical for a President to have Secret Service protection and yet, like most NRA members be in favor of gun control (http://www.drudge.com/news/163943/poll-most-nra-members-support-gun-control). Hey that is from Drudge!
Presidents have had Secret Service protection since 1901 after McKinley was assassinated. Leaders of countries are high value targets for Iranians or other terrorists or other crazy people. So what’s the point? Any President who is in favor of gun control should not be protected from assassins? That’s hypocritical? Presidents who favor gun control shouldn’t be protected from assassination?
Report this comment
ExLawman
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 9:42pm@3-BLUE although I agree with you in principal, you should watch tonight’s first 15 mins of GB. What you are doing is what the left wants you to do. They’ll show a few random idiots (Alex Jones anyone?) and say that’s everyone in the Tea Party and the far right. Don’t play into ther hands. We are at a tipping point…
Report this comment
ginger100
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 9:45pmwho was that guy that burnt rome to the ground because he was insane?
what we have is a pyromaniac for a leader
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrngdgUixYg
Report this comment
valiant1776
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 10:04pm@SendTheMeteors You missed all marks and points. It’s hypocritical because these are the same people who are out trying to portray guns as inherently evil and objects made just for murder and disaster, yet these are the same objects they employ in the hands of people to use as weapons to protect their life and property. They’re hypocrites. In CT, school children and school staff members were slaughtered because they were literally left defenseless. They waited for the police to arrive while a maniac was on the loose and all they had at their disposal were textbooks and their bare hands to defend themselves, while the police upon arriving at school (twenty minutes after the carnage) had ‘evil’ guns, a backup team, a squat team, armor, and other means to protect themselves against the same maniac on the loose. Days following, this same school, and surrounding schools, had armed police officers present in order to protect the school from future vile incidents, while the leftist media on the same day was out calling Conservatives “crazy” who desired to have their local schools offered the some form of security. What’s wrong with at least one trained, certified and licensed principle or certain chosen teacher as a backup for such emergencies? Not only is it hypocritical but absolutely deceptive. The leftist media, it seems, is only in business to viciously malign law abiding citizens who oppose their radical stupid agenda.
Report this comment
ginger100
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 10:19pm“putting out the fire with gasoline” by David Robert Jones
Report this comment
navydoc2008
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 10:26pm@ Raging an all like minded…
Please keep your heads on. I served our country for many years. I love our constitution. We all need to stand up for it, however… Who are you ready to fight against? The unarmed? The innocent? Your local police? The military? There is no clear defined enemy, there is no Mason-Dixon line. The best you could hope for with a show of force is a Waco, or a Ruby ridge, what a waste.
If the government could muster enough agents (which I think is statistically impossible) to go ferreting out who has guns, what would come of it? We all say Moan Labe, but… really? Do you think they would come to your house without a warrant? Without sufficient fire power? Do you think they would come in the daytime and just go door to door so you can be ready? Or do you think that they might strike at night, or early morning while you’re in the shower (they can check the water meter you know). They would be there with warrant in hand, ready to defend themselves from hostiles. Then what? Would you really place your family at risk (does not apply to you Ted Kaczynski types)? Will you go scrambling for a weapon to open fire yelling Moan Labe, just to make a statement? Let’s be realistic.
Continued –>
Report this comment
navydoc2008
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 10:28pmContinued…
Look, I fully support the 2nd amendment. I support the constitution in its entirety. This country is full of people who don’t, but (unfortunately) they are still our family (misguided, but family). No more should you fire upon your own uncle Waldo who is 180 degrees out from what you believe, than you should your ignorant neighbor who is anti gun. If the country were to get sucked into a “revolution,” you will be pit against other Americans who go to church with you, or work with you, your neighbors, even your friends.
I find it funny when the majority of people that advocate for a violent solution (this might not be your case) have never been in a battle, let alone watched someone die. It is not something that should be taken lightly by any means. Violence should always be the absolute LAST resort. Please support the NRA, support any and all peaceful solutions. I know that there are so many of us that just feel exhausted and even betrayed by so many, but all is not lost. We still have means (peaceful means) to have our voices heard. Please don’t lose your way.
continued –>
Report this comment
navydoc2008
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 10:29pmContinued…
By all means, have your groups that you gather in, but be the voices of reason in those groups. The other side is looking for those of you who are upset to say (and do) crazy things. Then they can parade you and your worst moments out publicly and demonstrate how evil and repressed gun owners are. Take the high road! Don’t show anger. Show determination, solidarity and respect, but never anger.
Always remember that if there is ever a clearly defined enemy that tries to take over our country, there are many of us that will fight by your side till our last breath.
Report this comment
BlueManRedState
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 10:46pmApples and Oranges. The Obama children need to be protected from gun-nuts and people who need barrels of ammunition used in rapid fire weapons. Our kids need to turn off Facebook and learn. More guns don’t make us safer… it makes it a war zone.
valiant1776
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 11:11pm@BlueManRedState Are you being serious? And exactly why the hell should some kids get better protection against a maniac and other kids left defenseless against the same maniac? Are we rationing over who’s life is worth more now? Un – freaking – believable. So please do tell, how will banning semi-automatic rifles and 30 round magazines stop a maniac from coming into another defenseless school and using two semi-automatic pistols with 15 round magazines each?
If more guns don’t make us safer then why in the world is Sandy Hook Elementary School and other surrounding schools still being protected by heavily armed police officers?
Report this comment
dwilco77
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 11:13pm@ sendthemeteors
I think the saying goes, it’s better to have people think you are an idiot, than type your comment, and remove all doubt. We have armed guards in every downtown building in our city to protect businessmen and women, bankers, customers, Lawyers, Politicians. Why are they there? to protect them from the rare lunatic that wanders into those buildings. We send our kids to school, and do not afford them the same security. You obviously soak up the Left-wing propaganda like it is Gospel. Obama’s kids deserve extra security because of the increased risk. That does not mean that our children do not deserve the same consideration albeit not to the extent the President’s children do. People like you are actually the ones that are endangering our kids. Don’t you like children? In 1928, 38 Elementary school kids were blown up by dynamite. Banning guns will not stop the insane. Killing them first with adequate protection will.
Report this comment
Mil-Dot
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 11:20pmThe “elite’ and ‘privileged” do not give a rat’s ass about your kids. Your kids are cannon fodder, disposable commodities for the liberal prog commie cause. Make no mistake. These vermin fully intend to use any illegality perpetrated to further insulate themselves and their family from risk while exposing the rest of us to the chaos. We are expendable. They are not. And, don’t you peasants ever forget it.
Report this comment
navydoc2008
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 11:23pm@Blueman-
You are obviously ignorant. Please define rapid fire weapons. Do you really mean to insinuate that a revolver made in the late 1800′s could not be “rapidly” fired? I beg to differ on that. I have seen many a cowboy gun show with people who can out shoot me (in both speed and accuracy) with their old Navy and cowboy model revolvers compared to my newest technology weapons (even my military issued ones).
Ignorant people like you love to throw around words like “rapid fire,” high capacity, automatic, or ASSAULT weapons, without knowing what you are really saying. Rapid fire is synonymous with automatic, neither of which is legally sold in open market today. There are some (some) exceptions to the rule but not the norm. High capacity? What’s that? Who gets to define it? I consider High capacity to be the 100 round capacity mags, you may think 5 to be too many. Again I am willing to bet that If I had nothing but 10 round mags, I could out shoot the average person shooting 10 round mags. Assault weapon… really? I think a knife, bat, maybe a fist are assault weapons. Please show me any statistic from any reference (not made up by you) that shows more people were assaulted by guns than any of the other means listed. Okay you got me I used a play on words (sorry you all are better at that then me). Just because a gun is black, or has a plastic stock doesn’t make it more deadly. I would put my Marlin lever action 444 up against an “Assault” rifle as defined
Report this comment
DarkJello
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 12:57amThe real gun nuts are the peeps trying to disarm the lawful.
Words on paper will NEVER stop a criminal!! Savvy?
Report this comment
sillyfreshness
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 1:01amHere check out this video. All the “useful idiots” that worship Judens on TheBlaze can see who is behind taking your guns away.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkp_WPTyUAs
Report this comment
rawmilker
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 1:01amHey Hussien, if gun control worked, wouldn’t Chicago be the safest place in America?
Report this comment
scissorflash
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 1:03amNo, we just saw the Republican alternative as exceedingly bad.
Report this comment
CenterLineStripe
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 1:16am@NavyDoc, I used to have a Marlin 444. God, that was a beast. Oh and well said, all of it
Report this comment
right field
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 1:34amWe must defend the 2nd Amendment. It is the only means of protection for the “average citizen” inside our domestic borders, in our communities, on our farms, in our schools, in our homes.
The mentally insane, the criminals, the drug cartels, the gangs and even an out-of-control Federal government are nothing more than domestic threats. The citizens must be armed against these threats if ‘life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness’ have any hope of being sustained.
Tell me Mr. President – How will you protect my family or me when the criminals beat down my door? Will you pass Obama-Death-Care to pay for the carnage? Will you raise my taxes to make sure all those who are murdered get a proper public burial? Will you give up your security protection to demonstrate your commitment to getting rid of guns? Will you demand that your children attend a school that has no security, no guards, and no guns? Mr. President, you are a hypocrite, a charlatan and a phony. I do not believe you have any interest in protecting anything that has to do with MY life, MY liberty or MY pursuit of happiness.
Report this comment
michaelmoron
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 1:37amPeople must be held ACCOUNTABLE for their actions.
THIS INCLUDES those ELECTED BY US !!!!!!
THESE PEOPLE HAVE BLOOD ON THEIR HANDS !!!!!!
DEMAND a PETITION holding the OFFICIALS responsible for the DEATHS and INJURY of all the victims of a “SITTING DUCK ZONE”.
These DEATHS are a result of their Neglegence and their Agenda.
They in essence, mandated that people not defend themselves.
Report this comment
rawmilker
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 1:37amMETEOR: Presidents who favor gun control shouldn’t be protected from assassination?
—————————–
A legitimate AMERICAN POTUS would NOT be in favor of gun control. Reagan was shot and he didn’t. He didn’t want to infringe on Americans rights….An authentic communist, arrogant community organizer, who had never worn a uniform, never had a real job, worked on a budget, or led anything more than an ACORN demonstration, wannabe dictator WOULD!
Report this comment
phil1765
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 1:51amSendTheMeteors
My guns don’t cause crimes you idiot. No gun I have ever owned has been used in the commision of a crime. I have detered two crimes from happening with them and never had to fire a shot. You probably know absolutely nothing about guns except what the media tells you and you want to comment like you are the worlds foremost expert. You are a moron of the very worst kind, I don’t begrudge you the right to be a complete idiot and not own a firearm, so why the hell do you begrudge me the right to own any kind of weapon that I want? All this bu–sh– that you idiot libs are talking about will do absolutely nothing to deter criminals or loony toons from committing mass shootings if they decide that is what they want to do. The one and only thing that even comes close to keeping them from it is armed security or armed citizens. All the crap you are calling for will do nothing except take rights from law abiding citizens but I am sure you are fine with it as long as they keep sending you those checks that keep you in twinkies for the month.
Report this comment
gb123
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 2:02amMaybe the tactics employed by the unions in trying to get recalls on ofiicials would be interesting.
Report this comment
phil1765
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 2:06amBlueManRedState
So let me get this straight, the moron in chiefs kids are more important in the grand scheme of things than mine or any other kids in this country? How exactly is it an apples and oranges conversation? Because he got a few million brain dead idiots like yourself to vote for him his kids count more than mine? You ever read Animal Farm? Probably not, but all animals were equals in the book just some were more equal than others. Evidently that is the world that you live in. Why would he need more protection than you or I he is the great uniter isn’t he, that is what all you freaking idiots have been yelling from the rooftops since you elected his dumb ass. Maybe he should just give a speech and tell the criminals to stop committing crimes and that would do the trick. Give me a freaking break.
Report this comment
scarydave
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:23amRAGING_WATERS
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:06pm
What we need is a dramatic increase in well equipped, well organized civilian militia nationwide….
——————————————————————————————————————————————–
Believe me we are trying to do just that. The biggest problem right now is not enough group leaders willing to step-up. I’m finding MANY people want to join militias to learn how to protect themselves. Plus, people instinctively know that there is strength and safety in numbers.
Report this comment
grimmster
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 6:09am@oath-keeper.
Stfu,really?Whens the last time you showed your face in public, or on a social media,”talking tough,and taking action” defending the secound amendment? My guess, NEVER.Pick a fight with people who would stand with you,and you will find yourself, standing alone……
Report this comment
Obama Been Lauding
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 6:13amNavyDoc,
I think, for the most part, you hit the nail on the head, with your statement.
I would like to point out, that yes the loon at the movie theater did use guns in the theater, but has anyone pointed out that he had rigged his apartment with explosive devices, and that the explosives were legal.
A crazy person can go to a gas pump, with a 5 gallon gas can, and fill it with 2 gallons of gasoline, and make an explosive that would probably kill and/or injure severely, anyone within 50-100 feet.
This is just one example, of many, assault weapons, that are not brought up, but are actually used.
Report this comment
WilliamORights
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 7:50amSorry. They have won. Cameras on every corner, cops with that sickeningly superior attitude, more things taxed at ever higher rates, paper for your labor, no education for your children, drugs to placate those out of liners, Alfred E. Newman in the role of president, the three stooges as VP, attorney general, and gov of NY, roach motel immigration/emmigration laws at al. I could go on with the list for a month.
Report this comment
ashestoashes
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 7:57am@NAVYDOC The problem with the “clearly defined enemy” lets say like the Japanese during Pearl Harbor..is not so clearly defined..You might want to read “Rules for Radicals” by Saul Alinsky..The enemy in this case..is from within..and it is a European entity..You also might want to study up on the un Federal Reserve..the Trilateral Commission…Council on Foreign Relations and the Communist Secret Societies like the Bilderbergs..the Bonesmen, the Bohemians..and the Freemasons..and the ones who were aligned with Hitler like the Thule and Vrile..We have Communism at our door..in high places..You might also want to research how the Rothschilds got their bank here..how they have started and funded all wars..and Agenda 21 which they have been in the process of implementing..they plan to take planet earth down to 500 million people living in small cities to
serve the hierachy.. The criminal banksters bankrupted us in 1868..have run the US as a corporation since..I understand Valerie Jarret. on Pat Dollard.com.(I believe born in Iran..the pres.’s brain) said the sellout of the US presidency to Arabs began in 1979..Well defined enemy?
Report this comment
Zipit
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 8:21amFellow blazers!!!! Allow me to offer a summation of METEORS POST! (In her own words): Wow, Hardcore, Ignorant, Slightly Crazy, Batshoot Nuts, Angrily, Vaguely Human, Mentally Ill, Hypocritical, and Crazy…… Ironically, this perfectly describes the majority of her posts!!!!!
Report this comment
dogpatch65
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 8:22amProject Veritas caught some hypocrites from the media on video too:
http://markamerica.com/2013/01/16/hypocrites-wont-proclaim-their-homes-gun-free-video/
Report this comment
Bohump
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 8:53amWell Said “Hunter 44″
Report this comment
Rickfromillinois
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 9:02amIt’s not just Obama. Almost all Washington DC politicians who have school age children send them to schools with armed guards. In Chicago when it was illegal for anyone to own a pistol, the City Counsel not only exempted themselves but were also allowed to carry them concealed. How about when politicians pass these laws the very first people who are affected are them or their security details. Let them first disarm themselves.
Report this comment
may40
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 9:15amLet’s be honest here. The only thing the Dems/liberals want is power! They want to control us because it’s euphoric to them. Here’s the problem…we’ll never be able to vote them out unless the citizens wake up which I don’t see happening in the near future. :-(
Report this comment
turkey13
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 9:46amYour kids don’t need a guard there with a gun protecting them – imagine the expense to protect the future workers and democratic voters. The wealthy folks kids are the future presidents, Congressman and CEO’s that will run the country. With all the laid off people there are to many peon workers now so we won’t miss your kids if some crazy guy steals a gun and comes in & shoots a bunch of the future workers. Thers to many kids with their hands out now for the free government phones also.
Report this comment
encinom
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 10:47amThe NRA brain dead sheep are out. This commercial, is little more than right wing porn for the fringe base that the NRA seems to represent.
Report this comment
Banter
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 11:14amEncinom and JZS(sendinthemetors)
I’m sure you are both OK with the video game showing the head of the NRA’s head being blown off, you know, because that’s what pansy libs like you support. Cowards the both of you.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/15/photos-from-new-bullet-to-the-head-of-the-nra-computer-game-will-horrify-you/
Report this comment
nonofmybiznez
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 12:59pmRaging, add to that well trained and I’ll join.
Report this comment
nocalifornia
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 12:59pmTime for a 4.25 million armed man march on OUR capital. The politicians no longer fear us, that needs to change now!
Report this comment
John.Galt
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 1:08pmConsidering AKs and ARs, magazines, and ammo are sold out everywhere, I would say the American people are GETTING READY.
I am a long time NRA member, but I just got my LIFETIME MEMBERSHIP!
Report this comment
Dismayed Veteran
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 1:18pm43 years ago, the US Army taught me to kill with a M16, M14, M60, M79, Model 1911, bayonet, machette, entrenching tool, steel pot, hands, feet, knees, teeth and rocks. It is beyond me why people feel they are safe if semi-automatic “military looking” rifles and high capacity magazines are banned or controlled. If some nut wants to kill he will. Your job is to make sure he isn’t successful.
Report this comment
cosette
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:52pm@ Valiant 1776…. Save your breath. Sendthemtalkingpoints is too blind to see the hypocrisy of these elitist, America hating slugs so how can you expect her/him/it to see through the fog of his/her/its obvious indoctrination to comprehend your insightful factual post? These people are beyond help. So, I suggest you ignore the brainwashed and concentrate on those who are just ignorant. You can’t fix stupid.
Report this comment
whygetmad
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 6:07pmThank you for your comments, they are right on. I am still in deep depression about how the election turned out. I am clear that there was massive fraud, and this is not sour grapes. As a teacher in Inner city Los Angeles, I have an up front seat on gun violence in LA. The problem is that when guns are taken from the public as opposed to street criminals, the public is left defenseless and at the mercy of the thugs in society! We must see the under belly of this govt. beast for what it is, a leviathian of progressive thought! The dangerous thing about progressives is that they really believe that they are enlightened above the rest of us and thus are qualified to lord it over us in all things! They seek to control us, but first they must take away from us all means of possible rebellion! That is, our weapons! Remember, the founders placed the 2nd Amendment to protect us from a tyrannical govt., period! This is what separates us from other democracies. We have freedom and we believe in something higher than ourselves! Progressives really are throwbacks from the communists when that theory failed miserably in the 20′s and 30′s! They believe that they can make a Socialist Utopian society work because they are somehow smarter! So, they have been bent on changing this society into the failed communist dream! To do this, the people must be brought into submission and the first thing is to make the people slaves through economic and social mandates. Then get the guns!
Report this comment
Keatonc33
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 8:47pmI think its pretty funny the NRA came out with this attack ad. and then the next day Obama took executive action to try and get SRO officers in all schools… jumped the gun a bit so to speak NRA
Report this comment
Raider1
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 6:31am@Raging_Water….THAT IS THE KEY MY FRIEND!!!!! The second amendment will not protect us. We must protect each other. Individually we dont stand a chance, but together…
“We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately” Ben Franklin
Report this comment
chiefyellowiron
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 1:23pmIm with Raging Waters. Our Militia nationwide. Tell us where to join, volunteer, and help bring us together.
Report this comment
fastgen1
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:46pmWOW–The NRA just got my dues,,, And they didn’t have to force me to pay up.. I am waiting to see what the anti-christ does about this video.
Report this comment
Silversmith
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:09pmI joined too! I would love to see this ad somewhere on prime time.
Silversmith
Report this comment
PA PATRIOT
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:15pmSilver
I know I am in good company.
Did you get the free pocket knife?
Report this comment
eagledown
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:36pmYep. I just renewed. (I was inactive for a few years)…
Report this comment
Silversmith
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:43pmPA – Dang, missed out on the pocket knife. I joined at the range after I took my basic pistol course.
Silversmith
Report this comment
Independent4233
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 11:04pm“………a New Jersey Police Officer who has been a member of Oath Keepers since 2009, makes it clear that he will not obey orders that violate the Bill of Rights. In particular, he says he will not be used as a tool of oppression against the American people who resist and refuse to comply with infringement on their right to bear arms, such as legislation or executive orders that decree they must register, get finger printed and photographed, like a criminal.”
He’s encouraging other police to refuse to enforce any gun registration/ laws recently enacted.
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2013/01/14/video-oath-keeper-officer-calls-on-brother-cops-to-refuse-to-enforce-gun-bans-or-registration/
Report this comment
mercenary4freedom
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 2:13amAnd I as well. Three years.
Don’t forget to stay alert, obama and his facist admin are going to try to hammer this divide & conquor gun control agenda home with another fabricated crisis. Stay alert, very alert.
Report this comment
bekhiet
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 10:12amI don’t have a gun yet, but I joined NRA last spring. I will be making a purchase this month. I know how to use them, been trained on many, but I still don’t like guns. However, I support the rights of the constitution and maintaining a free republic against enemies foreign and domestic.
Report this comment
EllieR
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:43pmOver 250,000 new members joined NRA since the Sandy Hook shooting. Just saying.
Report this comment
kickagrandma
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:43pmEXCELLENT AD!
Glenn is WRONG on being arrested. DO NOT GO INTO THAT DARK NIGHT. That is what people did in the 30′s thinking their lawyers would get them out, too. The lawyers died in the same gas chambers, people. Fema camps (by any other name are still gov’t. prisons for dissidents) are all over, in every State of the Union.
I say, let’s round up the traitorous sobs and stash their lazy arrogant butts there.
NO cell phones allowed (no pun intended).
NO visits for over a year.
NO mail.
NO access to msm or media of any kind.
moochie’s diet for EVERYONE in the pen.
NO cosmetic surgery or transgendering anything.
NO tv.
NO NADA, NADA.
NO information.
NO GUNS!!! : )
NO gyms to buff up in.
NO drugs (withdrawal is a b***h).
NO caviar.
NO limousines.
NO maid service.
NO money.
NO healthcare.
NO offices.
they can have all the elections in there that the want, but the votes do not count.
NOTHING but darkness and fear and time to think.
Lots and lots and lots of time to think.
That’ll work.
Report this comment
environmentalandawake
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:02pmGo Grandma!!!
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:18pmwe need civil disobedience. Laying down is not a viable option and glenn beck knows this. but he would rather maintain his media empire than raise up a generation of revolutionaries
Report this comment
Silvertruth
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 8:14pmYou guys are completely misunderstanding the current environment and what Glenn is saying.
Hitler was able to sieze power overnight, the tools were there for it. The tools are NOT here in the US for a similar grab. That is 10-20 years down the road. The President hasn’t marginalized Congress and the Supreme Court enough yet.
With that in mind, Glen is saying that prior to that happening, you can fight and win in the Courts, even to the Supreme Court. Flooding the jails will cripple cities, counties and states financially so they will NOT want gun owners in them. This will highlight any gun control laws turning millions of gun owners into criminals overnight. People will be forced to rethink their position. As long as we stay peaceful, that ‘rethink’ will fall on our side. If it’s violent, it could go either way but leaning to the ‘we lose’ side. This is what Glenn is telling you.
Do not raise your firearm in anger yet, the situation is not to that point. Hopefully, we can avoid that situation altogether, but I’m sure Glenn will be the first to tell you to pick up your gun if the other side turns violent first.
I do not advocate Civil War on this issue (yet) but trust me, it’s very, very possible and I strongly suggest restraint, but a clear lack of compliance on any assault weapons ban. The entire point of having these rifles is to remain in shooting distance of a tyranny led military. Do not give them up!
Report this comment
ChiefGeorge
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 9:56pmYes, but I believe the real intention here by this admin is to invite an attack against this nation, then your 10-20 years down the road scenario goes out the window. The draft gets enacted, martial law declared and then Hitlers National Socialist nation is reborn overnight (american style). No one is going to care about gun rights then and elections suspended. NDAA kicks in!
Report this comment
roscoe569
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 11:00pmBat **** nuts
Report this comment
NoMoMrNiceGuy
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:42pmHOOAH ! Let the games begin !
Report this comment
Box55
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:41pmMore truth than anything released by the White House!
Report this comment
CathyvanDyke
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 8:24pmBOX55
More truth than is forthcoming from Republican representatives. The silence is deafening? Why does it take the IRA to expose the hyprocrisy? Do Conservatives have any real representation in the democratic process?
Report this comment
Random_American
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 6:53amCathy, its the NRA. Lines are being drawn in the sand now that New York is signing legislation that will support Obama’s point of view.
Report this comment
8YRSOFHELL
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:39pmI don’t agree 100 percent with the NRA but if they were not around IMO we would be worse off as far as gun rights.
Report this comment
blackyb
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:06pmWe all know where this gun thing is going. Don’t kid yourself. The bummers want everyone disarmed but them. They like all the aces in the card deck. They do not care how they implement their agenda of destroying America, they intend to do it one way or the other. They are nothing more than usurpers and out to destroy this country. They dislike resistance of any type. They prefer guns to our rocks.
Report this comment
tajloc
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 9:53am8YRSOFHELL
Don’t fall for the “Arm the custodians” mantra. This is just another way to create an elite. WE are the first responders….WE don’t need to be ceritified…
Why put a trained, uniformed, maybe unionized guard in each school? He/she will just get shot first.
Why not just let the folks be uninfringed. It is only the teacher that is “in loco parentis.” The scenario can be rewritten if any or all the adults in a building, cinema, or church are packin’
Report this comment
Raging_Waters
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:36pmCriminals for Gun Control:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngsKzdKNAmo&feature=youtube
LET’S MAKE IT GO VIRAL!!! Even the most braindead liberal should be able to somewhat comprehend it.
After showing it to a liberal, ask them to imagine that this criminal represents their government. Then they may realize why it’s so important that lawful citizens need the big guns also..
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:40pmThis is a U.S. elected official who took an oath. He should be arrested now.http://weaselzippers.us/2013/01/15/shocker-steny-hoyer-thinks-obama-acting-like-a-dictator-on-gun-control-is-an-awesome-idea/
Report this comment
Raging_Waters
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:52pm@CIVILWARCOMETH
I’m thinking of setting up a tar and feather shop..I figure business will soon be BOOMING!!!
Report this comment
bekhiet
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 10:08amOk RAGING, I checked out your video and you make a good point and I did put it on a few liberals facebook pages.
Report this comment
Metallicat
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:33pmAnyone remember Obamas first inaugaration when he and moochie walked down the street followed by a SUV loaded with SS bearing “Assault rifles” and counter sniper teams on every roof? I always found that ironic that a man who wants to take away my second amendment rights, is afforded so much security from firearms. I always hated being told,”Do as I say,not as I do”,it always seems to come from the mouth of someone with thug like tendencies.
Report this comment
Bob
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:30pmGlenn did more to dishonor “we the people” last night than I would have every dreamed possible given the years I have followed him. There is only one way to clean the rat’s out of the barn. Our Constitution shows the way clearly enough. Glenn went so far as to point out that the UN would send troops here to defeat our Republic if we stood to fight. Don’t take my word for it, view the video on his web site for yourself. The date of this video is January 15, 2013. Play it for yourself. I’m thinking I’ve placed my money once again on the wrong guy.
Report this comment
travis
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:38pm@bob,
glenn is great. he has opened all of our eyes about many things. i certainly agree with you that he is completely wrong on that particular issue…..which happens to be a very big (maybe the biggest) issue indead.
Report this comment
CatB
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:39pm@BOB .. see my post below .. he doubled down on it tonight .. I am considering pulling my FUNDING from The Blaze TV … I can get that kind of “advise” from MSNBC or CNN.
Report this comment
SUNTZU
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:42pmIf we are all in jail or the FEMA camp.
Who will pay the bills
Should be looked into but my guess
most gun owners have jobs
Gun hate-progressive-commies live off them.( us)
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:47pmThis is how Glenn used sound like. From the kook/crazy family…http://www.humanevents.com/2013/01/15/rand-paul-vs-king-barack-i/
Report this comment
CatB
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:51pmI will be on the Blazecast tomorrow (usually around 1pm) and I am going to ask Scott what he thinks of Glenn’s pronouncement .. the past two days Scott has been talking about buying guns and going to a gun range … now does he want to be hauled off to jail or FEMA camp?
Report this comment
LIBSALWAYSLIE
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:02pmIf any of you are looking for someone who you’ll agree with 100% of the time, good luck. I dont agree with Glenn on everything, but I do agree with him on the vast majority of issues, and that works for me. I wont be canceling my subscription.
Report this comment
CatB
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:34pm@LIBS .. I think this is a BIG ONE … no I don’t expect or do agree on everything … but I think this is endangering Americans.
Report this comment
wzanesdad
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 8:13pmI don’t understand either. Glenn has always said we CANNOT ever give up our bill of rights. He has said that he truly believes that the bill of rioghts, the constitution, and the declaration of independence were inspired by God. According to the writings of the founders, the 2nd ammendment was specificly written to insure we the people had a defense against a tyrannical government. If it was inspired by God….for this very purpose….why is he saying to not use it now? Perhaps he is afraid the government will shut him down for preaching violence against the government…I don’t know.
Report this comment
wzanesdad
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 8:22pmHe has some splainen to do reekee.
Report this comment
wzanesdad
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 8:33pmAlso….remember when he was on fox, and he played a tape of some radicals, {some of whom are now in our government}, that said they were willing to kill up to 25 million of us to get their way? And he wants us to just trusyt them and go along to jail? Maybe he’s right, and he usually is….but I might have to think twice about that one.
Report this comment
truthnstuff
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 9:20pmThe Marxist liberals rally around anyone of their people no matter what they say or position they take. Conservatives, as soon as someone says one thing they don’t agree with they trash and dump him/her. I don’t necessarily agree 100% with Beck on this one issue, but does anyone really think he or anyone else can call for revolution and violence on the air and NOT get scooped up under NDAA.
I’m wondering if some of you are working for the other side. Use some common sense.
Report this comment
wzanesdad
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 9:40pmThe issue is not about him not calling for a revolution…it is about him telling everyone to surrender.
Report this comment
wzanesdad
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 9:59pmand I really don’t see anyone on here trashing him. I think it’s just more confusion than anything. Like I said efore….glenn is probably right about this, and I can’t wait to hear some further thoughts on it. You are wrong however, about liberals always agreeing with whoever says anything….just go to any liberal site and look at the comments…there’s plenty of disagreement. They just don’t announce it on the MSM.
Report this comment
ChiefGeorge
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 10:04pmI really appreciate all the work GB has done over the years. But he now seems to be distancing himself from what he started. He said he’s done with trying to get the word out and he is moving on, something about that he has got all the people onto the boat that he’s going to get. Maybe so…maybe so! Now what? We are going to educate the people about being great inventors and businessmen/women when our government is out of control?
We are in big trouble and we should not stop ringing the alarm bell. Hold your ground, be peaceful of course. But being passive in the face of this cultural civil war will only lead to genocide. When the guns are gone, it will be mass chaos in the USA. Thats when the UN troops show up! No one will be working and the debts will not get paid. America like Germany will have to get FIXED so the people can get back to work and pay their debts.
Report this comment
wzanesdad
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 10:25pmCHIEF,
I agree with you on not giving up on people. A few weeks ago, an aquaintance of mine, who is extremely liberal and an avid obama supporter, was waliking his dog in an alley near a kids park across the street from where I live. The dog crapped on the side of the alley in some overgrown weeds and trash that was in them. A cop saw it and gave him a ticket for $500 . This person was livid and the cop told him that because of new environmental laws in the town a dog can’t crap anywhere on city property. After I told him about agenda 21, and the new police powers that his kind have voted in, He seemed to finally understand what I have been telling him all these years.
Report this comment
GuruMeditation
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:19pmFine business. However, hypocrisy is the least of it. He’s much worse.
Report this comment
ares338
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:18pmObama’s theater of the absurd continues!
Report this comment
riseandshine
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:17pmThe NRA is a corrupt organization…I wouldn’t put much trust in it. We don’t want the federal government in education…let alone federal guards in our schools.
Report this comment
P8riot
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:24pmhi riseandshine,
I always appreciate your comments, but I’ve never heard the negative scoop on the NRA… can you point me in the right direction to find out? I’m always open to learn something new.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:28pmobviously, the school districts cannot afford armed guards….But the federal government would love to help them out….Of course there are strings attached. Next thing you know our kids will be going through school checkpoints, going through body scanners, and taking off their shoes. Then the armed guards (who will be paid by federal govt) will try to unionize…..They will call themselves SSA (School Security Agency)
Report this comment
right-wing-waco
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:30pmI agree with P8riot, how about telling us what is corrupt about the NRA? Please be specific. Thank you.
Report this comment
whatsallthisthen
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:51pmHey rise… if you think the NRA is corrupt don’t give them any money. The feds are corrupt but by law we must give them money or go to jail. The repugnant party is corrupt so I’ll not donate a dime to their moderate causes. I will however support with donations true conservatives. See it’s easy, donate to causes you feel are not corrupt.
Report this comment
riseandshine
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:56pm@P8triot….I’ll see what I can do. To be honest..I have heard from people I trust that that is the case….and I feel it in my gut that it is true. The NRA has been talking with the administration as we all know…and I think this is all theater. I think the Obama administration was planning on putting armed guards in our schools all along…if they could get enough public support. The NRA is trying to drum up that support with their loyal supporters.
Report this comment
CathyvanDyke
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:11pmThink about it. If Adam Lanzo had realized there were unidentified designated trained faculty at Sandy Hook Elementary who were armed with a concealed weapon … would he have embarked on his mission of evil knowing he could have been taken down in one shot. Adam was evil but he was not stupid.
In a “gun free zone” Sandy Hook Elementary faculty were denied their Constitutional right to use deadly force if necessary and six faculty were sitting ducks when gunned down along with 20 of their students.
Why are parents and loved ones of those massacred on that fateful day not crying bloody murder. Why are parents nationwide not petitioning “the powers that be” en mass for armed secuirty while their children are entrusted to the system? Something akin to the children of the elite..
Report this comment
honeydijon13
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 8:24pmThe NRA is a LOBBY GROUP for gun manufacturer.
They are in the business of selling as many guns as possible.
They do this by promoting fear, paranoia, and hysteria where none exists.
LIke military contractors they donate millions of dollars to candidates.
The second amendment has nothing to do with the NRA.
It’s about selling guns and profits.
Report this comment
Dismayed Veteran
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 1:34pmI wonder if the Principal who was killed charging Lanza wished she had a gun. I wonder if the teacher her shielded her students with her body wished she had a gun. I wonder if the 20 children killed wished that at least one adult had a gun.
Report this comment
honeydijon13
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:15pmElitists to GOP.
Anyone with an IQ over 100
Report this comment
RedHarley
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:26pmHoney,
You are a moron. Being “Elitist” has absolutely nothing to do with IQ or being smart. The most obvious proof of that is the fact that Joe Biden IS an elitist.
You may believe that it is ok for the political and media elite to create different rules for them and their families, but I don’t believe the majority of the country really believe that. Your blind loyalty to these people is stunningly ignorant.
Report this comment
whatsallthisthen
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:41pmhoneydijon 13 is so proud of her IQ that she posts it in her handle.
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 8:04pmWHATs and Red : ” Honey ” is just a name name as of January 11. ( Am sure it’s just an old Troll with a new ” identity.” ) Remember JUSTTIM ? ELISIUM ? WANGO ? Think there are about 3 of them with multiple “personalities” who Troll here !
Report this comment
honeydijon13
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 8:17pmPeople take new names when their accounts are blocked.
How does that happen?
Report this comment
milo75
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:11pmIm joining my whole family up today. Thank you NRA for standing up and i will support you!
Report this comment
riseandshine
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:18pmNot me.
Report this comment
CatB
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:29pmIsn’t that what America is about .. freedom to choose .. .oh not in Obama’s America ..
Report this comment
bannedfromCNN
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:29pmDitto!
Report this comment
milo75
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:30pmGood see you on the other side then!
Report this comment
TX_45_ACP
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:32pmI just renewed and convinced my bro’s to sign up. The NRA has done a lot to curb the gun-gabbers. Like any org, they are not perfect.
Report this comment
Magyar
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:54pm@Rise– Then DON’T— I hope you’re one of the first victims of the FEMA invasion! Idiot!
Report this comment
Clownzilla
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:04pm@Rise
I donated an extra $35 to the NRA in your honor. That is the amount of a 1 year membership so consider yourself a proud honorary member of the NRA.
Report this comment
honeydijon13
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 8:18pmThe NRA has NOTHING to do with the 2nd amendment.
If you don’t get that – you never will.
Report this comment
Git-R-Done
Posted on January 18, 2013 at 1:27amHoney – Don’t be upset that the NRA protects my second amendment rights from Marxist tyrants like you.
Report this comment
Keatonc33
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:10pmAgreed. there should be more guns in schools! principles, guards ( though be ready to spend more on the public school system) and janitors teachers etc etc. I also think we should start arming every inner city kid! this will obviously help inner city crime!
Report this comment
Fubared
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:30pmBut keep arming the smarmy libs with cutting vitriol only. Health and safety and all. Your king has no clothes and you keep commenting on how dapper he looks.
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:55pm33: Many ” inner city kids ” are already armed and gang members. Check the Obama radicals’ home base, Chicago. Total problem there.
Report this comment
valiant1776
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 8:49pmAgreed. There should be guards in private schools and government buildings. Oh wait, there already is. You liberals are freaking pathetic. Every judge and politician gets to go work in a truly safe environment but our children in public schools are left to fend for themselves? You despicable leftist trolls.
Each school district or board should decide whether to hire professional security teams, enact better and tougher security measures, or have trained, certified and licensed principles or certain teachers as a backup for extreme emergencies (though be ready to spend more on the public school system in order to protect the lives of our children. BTW, I don’t know of any parent who’s not willing to pay more in taxes to ensure the safety of their children). I also think we should start enforcing our criminal laws in the books and giving out stricter sentences in these crime filled massive liberal cities, and finally get these thugs off the streets! This will keep these pathetic low lives in jail where they belong (though be ready to spend more on enforcement and the justice system in order to keep you safe from these dangerous individuals).
This is of course too much common sense and plain logic for leftist liberal morons to comprehend.
Report this comment
The Third Archon
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:05pmNow, I may be going out on a limb here, but if I had to WAGER on it, I’d say more people would like to, and have tried to, assassinate President Obama, than any particular schoolchild picked out at random from among America’s schools–NOT really an analogous situation there NRA.
Report this comment
MAULEMALL
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:15pmwhat a class A ignorant douchnozzle…
The Moose and Squirrel have more protection than anyone else in the world.
Report this comment
Metallicat
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:17pmWhen were all these assassination attempts made against Obama? I missed a bunch if he has had more attempts on his life than any other president. And here I thought the future was hopeless.
Report this comment
weareskrewed
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:20pmSay What !!!
Report this comment
Metallicat
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:57pmoops! read it too fast. my mistake. But still glad to see the future isnt hopeless and the NRA isnt backing down.
Report this comment
dublinthewagons
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:04pmApril 14 1865. False security. Does history repeat itself? Just asking
Report this comment
bekhiet
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 10:18amI believe Lincoln’s guards were bribed, obviously certain things will work. In Lincoln’s case it was alcohol at the bar across the street, for others it may be prostitutes (as in the S. America incident).
Report this comment
CatB
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:04pmOkay .. a little off subject but does concern guns. Today on The Blaze Glenn doubled down on us being ARRESTED when/if they come to get our guns .. and not only that made “fun” of the idea of a Gun Appreciation day .. saying people taking to the streets in 3 corner hats and such just makes us look ridiculous (btw .. I have never “dressed up” more than to wear red white and blue to any event) .. he said we should not take to the streets … really. We should just be rounded up by Obama (remember Van Jones wants us DEAD) and go along quietly. I was one of the first to sign up for GBTV and on The Blaze .. but Glenn is putting me and my family in DANGER with this talk. Has he never heard of FEMA and what they have planned .. how about all that ammo … how about the body bags and caskets. He may be feeling TOO safe in Texas like those in Washington D.C. … get real Glenn if I go missing besides my friends and family .. NO ONE WILL NOTICE.
Report this comment
dublinthewagons
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:13pmHe has body guards. Don’t ever forget it. I like glenn but no cowards in my unit.
They always went home first. In a bag
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:17pmglenn spent a good portion of last week tearing apart alex jones – and one of the things glenn beck called him crazy about was the fema camps…..i first learned about fema camp executive order from glenn beck so i dont know what has changed for him. I think he sees himself as MSM media now – so he has to keep the status quo
Report this comment
CatB
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:18pmWell I think Glenn is emboldening our enemies and putting us in danger and I do not appreciate it .. he needs to not incite violence but not tell people to go nicely to the gas chambers .. haven’t we seen this in history before?
Report this comment
travis
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:33pmi agree fully. what about the jews who went quietly? they didn’t “overburden” the german prison system. with gun owners securly off the streets, i wouldn’t put ANYTHING past these people.
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:35pmRemember Glenn showing this? So now Glenn need’s to explain himself on this one..Something isn’t right…http://www.ironicsurrealism.com/2010/06/10/video-undercover-fbi-agent-infiltrated-and-exposes-bill-ayers-weather-underground-genocidal-plan/
Report this comment
GLOCKU
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:43pmI agree CATB. Perhaps Glenn should see what his buddy Ted Nugent thinks of his recent loss of a spine.
Report this comment
sta
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:52pmI have to agree. I’m not sure if Glenn’s big plans have gotten in the way of common sense, but I’m not ready to get in a cattle car and hand over any firearms I had (if I had some). I’m not anti-gun, by kids learned how to shoot at a local sportsman’s club, but we have never been able to afford them.
I’m wicked with a sling shot though. LOL
Report this comment
CatB
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:54pmExcellent GLOCK .. too bad Ted moved to Texas .. we used to live in the same town .. in the 1970′s he showed up at some of our parties on “the farm” .. which I had a way to contact him now .. think I will try tomorrow.
Report this comment
UnreconstructedLibertarian
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:32pmGlenn evidently does’t want to deal with gun confiscation in New Orleans. Where “good” folk, who were not in any danger, were “helped” by the government. Forcibly removed from their safe, lawful premises like criminals with their guns confiscated for just being there.
I daresay that if all those folk had “taken to the street” in a unified show of solidarity – rather than being picked off maliciously one by one – things might have been different. Lesson learned, I say.
The very idea we could repeat MLK’s pacifist stategy is REDICULOUS! The Government was on MLK’s side – in that his movement fit in with their larger, socialistic agenda. Us gunowners DO NOT. Ghandi was successful because Britian could not AFFORD its empire anymore, the US empire is attempting to EXPAND! Any paralells are not only naieve, but about as inapplicable as it gets. We gunowner/constitutionlists bear no similarities at all in our perdicament.
Hence, Glenn’s advise on this matter is horribly bogus. He may have a good handle on current communistic agendas, but he doesn’t understand how those pacifist examples actually FIT THAT AGENDA.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 7:40pmmakes no sense to talk about violent/nonviolent resistance if we cant even nominate constitutional candidates or get simple constitutional convention among all the “red” states
Report this comment
brother_ed
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 9:35pm@CATB
I think Glenn’s point is that this regime always puts us in a ‘lose-lose situation’.
The media has been portraying us as ‘violent’, ‘terrorists’, ‘racist’, etc. when all we’ve done is go to a few rallies and some town hall meetings.
No matter what we do on the 19th, it will be construed as nefarious.
We are being set up.
We are being poked and picked on.
They need us to make a move so they can set the plan in motion.
Glenn is saying, don’t fall for it…continue to use the system we were given (the Constitution) and keep trying to expose them for who they are.
Use the courts…don’t be ‘reactive’, be ‘proactive’.
Do not fall for the bait…
The left has been building alliances for years (radical Islam, communists, drug cartels, anarchists), and they will all join the fight against us. The same with the UN & NATO. We are what stands between them and their dream.
They cannot fire the first shot, or the narrative they have spun will come undone.
They need us to loose our cool, that’s why they are pushing our buttons.
That’s my take on it…
Report this comment
americanfirst
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:02pmWe need to gather our resources and develop our own conservative American citizen-run media that cannot be bought off by foreign interests or global socialists!!!
We’ll shut them down because the true 80% of America’s conservative citizenry will tune off – remove the existing federal government by ostracizing them completely.
Say no to their programming.
Say No to their schools
Say no to their policies
Say no to their taxes
Heck say no to their currency
If they want to subjugate by consolidating the power unto themselves…
REMOVE THE IMPLEMENTS OF POWER!!!
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 5:58pmNot only are his kids protected by armed guards, they attend a private school. And people do not see the hypocritical fraud of our Wizard of Oz, President Obama ? And other Democrats like Al Jazeera Gore ?? Harry ” Somebody said that Romney never paid taxes for 10 years ” Reid ? Or Nancy ” We must Pass the Bill To Read the Bill” AstroTurf Pelosi ? Unbelievable that any sane, intelligent person would support these liars and hypocrites who divide and obstruct on our taxpayer dime.
Report this comment
CatB
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:05pmI think your last sentence sums it up …
Report this comment
oldguy49
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:15pmcatb………hit the nail on the head
Report this comment
GuruMeditation
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:28pmIndeed… it would not matter how hypocritical and evil the dude is. If we weren’t surrounded by apathetic, lazy, morons that can vote he would not be the so called “leader of the free world”. This corruption will be corrected over time. History does not allow such crap to continue forever.
Report this comment
Frogginit
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 5:56pmObama says he doesn’t think armed guards will work in schools. It’s time to get rid of them where his kids attend school. Why waste taxpayers money on something that doesn’t work.
Report this comment
kickagrandma
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:33pm@FROGGINIT~~~~ and his body guards for life, don’t forget them.
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 5:56pmits a state and local issue – NRA you better keep your TSA-loving hands out of this
Report this comment
bobfrommosinee
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:14pmThe NRA is representing States Rights just as well as ” We The Peoples Rights ”
It’s the Constitution Stup!d, The recognition that all Rights are the Property of the People, and Not subject to a by your leave of the Government, or what are called reasonable restrictions, One a right can be placed under any thing called a reasonable restriction, It is no longer a RIGHT!!!
Report this comment
soybomb315_II
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:20pmif a local school district decides not to allow guns in their government schools – it is their right to do so….Just like McDonalds. If you dont like it, then go to the public school meetings and raise cain. This is not a one-size-fits all kind of thing.
Report this comment
DougHuffman
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 5:56pmSorry, the NRA pot is calling the Obama kettle black. NRA lifers are the ultimate elitists, well maybe just after JBT SWAT paras. Emperor NRA has no clothes.
MOLON LABE Oedipussy Rex
Report this comment
CatB
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:45pmWow .. I’m an “elitist” .. really oh .. my I am two levels above lifer … and here I thought I was just a Patriot. You are certainly confused.
Report this comment
honeydijon13
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 12:58amPatriot has become just another word for loon.
You need better reps.
Report this comment
Git-R-Done
Posted on January 18, 2013 at 1:29amHoney – Don’t get mad that you Marxists aren’t patriotic Americans and want to set up a dictatorship.
Report this comment
SpankDaMonkey
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 5:56pm.
You Silly…..
If you put armed guards at schools, there won’t be any dead children for Obama to crawl over……
jhrusky
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:06pmI’m not sure there are dead kids anymore, at least at this school:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrngdgUixYg
Report this comment
CatB
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:06pmExactly .. and after he has crawled over the dead .. he is going to use some live ones to put his unconstitutional executive orders to the public tomorrow. DISGUSTING VILE POS.
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on January 15, 2013 at 6:11pmExactly, how could the radical Democrats push their agenda without victims ? Photos of YOUNG Trayvon and now those little children…….
Report this comment
YOURSENSEI
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 10:12amMr os Ms SPANKDAMONKEY,
This is what you must know:
There were armed guards at Columbine.
It is so.
Report this comment
valiant1776
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 6:39pm@yoursuperstupid
This is what you don’t know.
There were no armed guards at Columbine.
There was one police officer out in the parking lot.
There was another police officer nearby writing a ticket to a driver.
No one but the two murderers were armed inside the school.
Students and staff were left defenseless inside the school.
You’re an idiot.
Report this comment