Death Toll Revised Down to 24 After Monstrous Oklahoma Tornado…100+ Injured…Children Among the Dead…Some Drowned…Heartbreaking Pictures…Reporter Struggles to Share Terrible News

As Heard on Beck Radio: All the stunning videos from the tornado — Mom’s incredible interview, HD video, the time lapse

Government

Here Are the 23 ‘Executive Actions’ Obama Will Be Taking on Guns

Jan. 16, 2013 3:10pm Jonathon M. Seidl

Below is a list of the 23 “executive actions” that the president will be taking in the wake of the Sandy Hook massacre. Via the Wall Street Journal.

“There’s very little in this part that will be too big or controversial,” claims Business Insider. “It’s very small bore regulatory stuff.”

We’ll let you decide:

1. Issue a Presidential Memorandum to require federal agencies to make relevant data available to the federal background check system.

2. Address unnecessary legal barriers, particularly relating to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, that may prevent states from making information available to the background check system.

3. Improve incentives for states to share information with the background check system.

4. Direct the Attorney General to review categories of individuals prohibited from having a gun to make sure dangerous people are not slipping through the cracks.

5. Propose rulemaking to give law enforcement the ability to run a full background check on an individual before returning a seized gun.

6. Publish a letter from ATF to federally licensed gun dealers providing guidance on how to run background checks for private sellers.

7. Launch a national safe and responsible gun ownership campaign.

8. Review safety standards for gun locks and gun safes (Consumer Product Safety Commission).

9. Issue a Presidential Memorandum to require federal law enforcement to trace guns recovered in criminal investigations.

10. Release a DOJ report analyzing information on lost and stolen guns and make it widely available to law enforcement.

11. Nominate an ATF director.

12. Provide law enforcement, first responders, and school officials with proper training for active shooter situations.

13. Maximize enforcement efforts to prevent gun violence and prosecute gun crime.

14. Issue a Presidential Memorandum directing the Centers for Disease Control to research the causes and prevention of gun violence.

15. Direct the Attorney General to issue a report on the availability and most effective use of new gun safety technologies and challenge the private sector to develop innovative technologies.

16. Clarify that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit doctors asking their patients about guns in their homes.

17. Release a letter to health-care providers clarifying that no federal law prohibits them from reporting threats of violence to law-enforcement authorities.

18. Provide incentives for schools to hire school resource officers.

19. Develop model emergency-response plans for schools, houses of worship and institutions of higher education.

20. Release a letter to state health officials clarifying the scope of mental-health services that Medicaid plans must cover.

21. Finalize regulations clarifying essential health benefits and parity requirements within ACA exchanges.

22. Commit to finalizing mental-health-parity regulations.

23. Launch a national dialogue led by Secretaries Sebelius and Duncan on mental health.

–

For more in-depth coverage of the president’s gun speech on Wednesday, see our complete story here.

You can read the text of Obama’s speech here.

–

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (351)

Cottoneyed77
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:48pm
Whether, Reagan did or didn’t, my answer would be the same as Ben Shapiro’s. “So”.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- yougottabekidding
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:05pm
  Not one word on hollywoods making billions of dollars by pushing gun violence (how many movies have come out without graphic violence and gun violence?)( hell a lot of them are killing cops) or the gaming industry.
  Those are his friends, they support him they should be allowed to show as much gun violence as they want.
  Personally I believe they should have a sur-charge for every round fired in a movie. let us say $3000 each!
  
  Report this comment
- yougottabekidding
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:10pm
  7. Launch a national safe and responsible gun ownership campaign
  
  Who is this directed to? The criminals? I don’t think they care!
  Most legal owners are already there. This is I want to know where they are so we can get them before we start!
  
  Report this comment
- rangerskippy
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:33pm
  Let me help you out there Mr President, and add a few more for you.
  
  24 – have task force figure out why black Americans are 12.5% of the population, and do 1/2 the nations murders.
  
  25 – Lower black murder rates to that of whites, making the national murder rate drop by almost 40%, also save man black lives, and have a national murder rate that is as low as the lowest nations in Europe
  
  26 – Direct Chicago, and other cities with the highest gun violence to ditch their tight gun control policies, thus making criminals not feel so safe, and allowing law abiding citizens to protect themselves
  
  27 – prosecute DOJ Eric Holder for putting “assault weapons” in the hands of drug dealing gangs that in turn murdered hundreds of Mexican citizens and one of our border patrol agents
  
  28- Systematically ditch the welfare programs. Our violent crimes are intrinsically tied to our welfare programs
  
  29 – Seal the border, and punish business that hires illegal workers. Have our welfare folks begin to do the work the immigrants were coming here to do, this will lower taxes, and cut back on crime. When the welfare crowd goes back to work, they will have less time for drugs, sex outside of marriage, and other violent activities
  
  30 – I will read the constitution, and realize that the founding fathers did not recognize citizens rights to arm themselves to hunt, target shoot, or collect guns, but did recognize that right, so they could protect themselves against a corrupt govern
- dublinthewagons
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:35pm
  OBAMA CARE was never about healthcare. Ha ha ha
  Stop looking at your nose. Look deeper than gun control sheep.
  Obama is controling the discussion and his agenda keeps moving.
  
  Report this comment
- afishfarted
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:36pm
  He ain’t no dummy, that’s for sure. #16. Clarify that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit doctors asking their patients about guns in their homes. This is legislating. NO prez can rewrtie duly passed legislation.
  #14. Issue a Presidential Memorandum directing the Centers for Disease Control to research the causes and prevention of gun violence.. Since when is gun violence considered a diesease? It isn’t, but this e.o. is a step to classify gun owners as somehow diseased. Folks, slick wording can not mask his intent to disarm
  
  Report this comment
- RedHarley
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:39pm
  He said “If it will save one life” we have to act.
  Ok, Mr. President. I have an idea that will indisputably save countless lives. No one can counter that this idea will not save lives, and many more than the ONE that meets your criteria. Many will call this idea by many names, but it is just based in fact. It is based in demographics. It is based in the reality of where most of the gun violence is occurring. It is based on who the shooters are in most of the murders in our inner cities.
  My idea is this:
  In any city where the majority voted for you, we need to dis-arm any young man between the ages if 16-30 that looks like he COULD BE YOUR SON. Police will be authorized to frisk anyone meeting that description at any time. Anyone found to be carrying a firearm will be arrested, held without bail, tried and if convicted will spend a minimum of 10 years in prison. That will save many more lives than what you are offering in banning “assault weapons” and magazines.
  Yes, it is unconstitutional, but that hasn’t stopped you yet. Will you do it ? No. Will you consider it ? No. Would you even admit to how many murders are beings committed by young black men killing other young black men ? No. You don’t care about young black men any more than you care about young black children in the womb. As long as you can push your progressive agenda you don’t care about anyone.
  As long as you and yours are protected by firearms the rest of us can “eat cake”.
- 1TrueOne55
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:40pm
  7. Launch a national safe and responsible gun ownership campaign
  
  Mandate NRA membership to comply with this initiative or the Draft for Military service since that would also teach weapons familiarization and safety. Plus military service would keep the 18-24 yr olds that may commit most of the crime under Federal custody and teach them job skills etc etc etc…
  
  Report this comment
- pdw
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:51pm
  All this and nothing to solve our economy proglem?
  
  Report this comment
- rangerskippy
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:55pm
  “The Communist party must control the guns.”
  ― Mao Tse-tung
  
  Report this comment
- Tx Spud Bar
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 5:00pm
  the tyrannical government at as it clears its throat to next silence the 1st amendment as it guts the 2nd which protects the 1st.I never thought I would see our country turn into Venezuela .Next is an executive order to no term limits.
  
  Report this comment
- rolla020980
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 5:13pm
  @yougottabekidding
  
  So, you would protect the 2nd amendment by trampling the 1st? That’s very hypocritical. I would see the entire bill of rights protected. Unlike you, I do not pick and choose.
  
  Report this comment
- @leftfighter
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 5:18pm
  I disagree with BI that there’s “nothing too controvercial” here.
  
  2. Address unnecessary legal barriers, particularly relating to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, that may prevent states from making information available to the background check system. // so much for Doctor/patient confidentiality…
  
  3. Improve incentives for states to share information with the background check system. // like they do with seatbelt laws: do it or we’ll refuse to give you money for x, y, and z.
  
  5. Propose rulemaking to give law enforcement the ability to run a full background check on an individual before returning a seized gun. // so a legally owned gun can be confiscated at a later date. Might mean nothing; might mean someone on a Nixon-type enemies list has his gun taken after doing nothing wrong.
  
  13. Maximize enforcement efforts to prevent gun violence and prosecute gun crime. // why weren’t we doing this all along?
  
  16. Clarify that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit doctors asking their patients about guns in their homes // essentially calling on doctors to turn into his own Stasi.
  
  17. Release a letter to health-care providers clarifying that no federal law prohibits them from reporting threats of violence to law-enforcement authorities. // ditto
  
  18. Provide incentives for schools to hire school resource officers. // the one thing I agree with wholeheartedly.
  
  At least they’re agreeing that mental health is a problem. That’s
  
  Report this comment
- RogueRequest
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 5:55pm
  This why people are starting to think that conservatives are whack jobs. You can’t even think about coming just a little bit into the middle, can you?
  
  1) There is no correlation between violent video games and violent crimes except that violent crimes have dropped significantly since there inception. If you don’t want your kid to play them, don’t let your kid play them, period. The average gamer is 37-years old, don’t punish me because you can’t control little Timmy. Btw, the same goes for movies. (Why haven’t you mentioned books? Maybe because you can’t read?)
  
  2) When you keep drumming that African American murder rates you just look racist. Chances are those rates have more to do with there poverty and less to do with their color. In my area most of the criminals tend to be white.
  
  3) There are plenty of mental health issues that aren’t going to turn people into mass murderers. Adam Lanza’s Aspergers probably had zero to nil to do with what he did. All you are going to do is alienate a group of people that will then turn to the liberals when they see that the right has abandoned them.
  
  I am a big fan of the 2nd Amendment. I own a gun myself and I want to keep it. I don’t think anyone has the right to know that I know said gun. I just think we are going to lose the battle if you keep harping one the wrong subjects.
  
  Report this comment
- Dan_o
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 5:55pm
  This is rich:
  
  “4. Direct the Attorney General to review categories of individuals prohibited from having a gun to make sure dangerous people are not slipping through the cracks.”
  
  I guess MS13 doesn’t qualify as dangerous.
  
  Report this comment
- oldguy49
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 5:59pm
  just saw some figures on australia’s crime the first 12 months after their government took their guns away………………crime up as much as 44% in some catagories…………
  
  Report this comment
- RabidPatriot
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 6:16pm
  Looks like the king is going to try and make gun control a part of healthcare to subvert the 2nd Amendment as a public health issue.
  
  Report this comment
- GuruMeditation
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 6:20pm
  Impeach Obama Now. Bill Clinton was impeached for less. Screw your head on America!
  
  Report this comment
- rosecityken
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 6:25pm
  @yougottabekidding and isnt #7 what the NRA is all about? arent democrats demonizing one of the oldest “civil rights ” organizations, that stated purpose is responsible gun handling and ownership?
  
  Report this comment
- Armed Patriot
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 6:35pm
  rangerskippy… Damn skippy on those and a few more… Investigate Ben Gazzi for the crimes and neglect he committed against American “workers”, the assaults against American firearms dealers in border states, etc.
  
  Report this comment
- RedHarley
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 6:46pm
  @roguerequest,
  
  You say “2) When you keep drumming that African American murder rates you just look racist. Chances are those rates have more to do with there poverty and less to do with their color. In my area most of the criminals tend to be white”
  
  That is the problem. Speaking the TRUTH looks racist ? To who ?? Only morons.
  Here is a link to homicides in Baltimore, Md. : http://tinyurl.com/6a4jkn
  Play with the stats all you want. It is pretty grim for blacks. For 2012 there were 172 blacks shot and killed while there were 7 whites. Do you really think it was a bunch of white people that shot and killed 172 blacks ?
  
  In Baton Rouge, La. it is just as bad if not worse. The Advocate yesterday printed stats that said that last year (2102), 83 people died by homicide in Baton Rouge. Of that number, 87 percent were black, and 87 percent were male. Two-thirds had been in trouble with the law before, and one-third had been in trouble with the law for drugs. The median age of victims: 26.
  
  Of the perpetrators, the median age was 22. Get this: 96 percent of them were black, and 90 percent were male. Almost two-thirds had previous arrests. One out of four had a drug record.
  96 percent of the perps were black……90 percent were male.
  
  Speaking the truth is not racism.
  Poverty has NOTHING to do with this. There are many poor places in Appalachia with plenty of guns where this does not happen. This is a problem of culture that this president will not address.
  
  Report this comment
- SUNTZU
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 6:54pm
  Not worth the toilet paper there written on.
  
  Report this comment
- SUNTZU
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 6:54pm
  Not worth the toilet paper there written on.
  
  Report this comment
- subic
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 7:31pm
  I don’t need hussein and his flunkies telling me how to be safe & responsible with weapons.
  
  Rand Paul to file legislation to nullify hussien’s unconstitutional gun regs.
  
  http://weaselzippers.us/2013/01/16/report-rand-paul-to-push-legislation-nullifying-emperor-obamas-executive-orders-on-guns/
  
  Report this comment
- subic
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 7:35pm
  GOV. RICK PERRY BLASTS OBAMA AND LEFTIST EXTREMISTS. CALLS EXPLOITING MASSACRED CHILDREN FOR POLITICAL GAIN “DISGUSTING” – Gov. Rick Perry of the great state of Texas today blasted Barack Obama and his Obamaist extremist followers for exploiting the death of children in order to promote their Liberty restricting agenda. He said, “Guns require a finger to pull the trigger…There is evil prowling in the world – it shows up in our movies, video games and online fascinations, and finds its way into vulnerable hearts and minds. As a free people, let us choose what kind of people we will be…The piling on by the political left, and their cohorts in the media, to use the massacre of little children to advance a pre-existing political agenda that would not have saved those children, disgusts me, personally. The second amendment to the Constitution is a basic right of free people and cannot be nor will it be abridged by the executive power of this or any other president.” AMEN GOV. PERRY. It is disgusting how they are exploiting murdered children to promote their agenda.
  
  Like i always say, it’s a tough world out there & the best defense from a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.
  
  Report this comment
- smv803
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 8:02pm
  This reminds me of buying a car, only to be told by the dealer the steering will be extra. Will Osama make it so anyone trying to buy a gun would have to be content with the fact that bullets would be illegal and can’t be purchased?
  
  Report this comment
- imsteph
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 8:33pm
  and his arrest warrant hasn’t been issued yet?
  
  Report this comment
- The Giver
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 8:38pm
  I don’t care what Reagan did either. They ‘re ALL POLITICIANS! Even the left will someday realize that about the O.
  
  @YOUGOTTABEKIDDING…. do you really want to infringe on the First Amendment? Give them a finger and…..yes, they will take your hand.
  
  Report this comment
- turkey13
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 8:57pm
  This is good stuff – Obama basically said, ” we will pass between agencys the names of all the folks that are off in the heads. That Newspaper that listed all the gun owners will do us a Favor and list the names and address of all the mentally retarded people. He is doing away with the patient/Dr. privalidge. Hopefully he will also do away with attourney/client privalide next and all the crooks won’t get off so easily. Four or five years ago you could get in big trouble if you called a ****** a ******, now we will find out who they are.
  
  Report this comment
- Keatonc33
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 9:13pm
  Im sorry but can anyone tell me how any of these are either infringing or any reason why you wouldn’t support any of these?
  
  Report this comment
- Too_Far_Gone
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 11:15pm
  Didn’t read it, don’t care what this jackass has to say or sign the higher this bastard tries to climb, is that much farther he will fall and that works just fine for me ..
  
  http://theseason.yolasite.com/
  
  Read it ALL, know it because you are living it. 3 tabs at the top.
  
  Report this comment
- NewMedia
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 11:16pm
  Barack Obama always uses Ronald Reagan when he’s trying to take away our rights. As an African American, I know for a fact that deep down inside him, he hates Ronald Reagan. But like the liberal that he is, he’ll use Reagan when he fells it will move his agenda forward. Most of my friends actually still buy this load of…..well you know what. When it comes to what happened today, this says it all.
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUHPoLKDWKM
  
  Report this comment
- yougottabekidding
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 11:29pm
  Rolla
  
  You can not yell fire in a theater. No body said they can not do it they
  just have to pay as I do for my rights to own and carry
  The graphic violence depicted in movies is not what a person with
  a mental problem needs. Maybe we should start checking with doctors
  if they should be allowed to see the movie so we can virtually keep killing
  with out common sense
  
  Report this comment
- Keatonc33
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 11:55pm
  Newmedia…. being as Ronald reagan not only supported a nation wide gun ban, but also made one law when he was governor of california. and being that hes been one of the most respected presidents of the past 60 years.. why is it so bad to point out that both parties can come together on this. I mean even 74% of NRA members support stricter gun laws. its the small but incredibly loud fringe thats standing in the way.. i.e. this page
  
  Report this comment
- Keatonc33
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 11:59pm
  By the way miss “new media” you can pretty much blame the state of the media in America today on Ronald Reagan! He did after all appeal the “fairness doctrine” I do agree we need a new media. where facts run the show not bias speculation.
  
  http://fair.org/extra-online-articles/the-fairness-doctrine/
  
  Report this comment
- 22AUTOMATIC
  Posted on January 17, 2013 at 12:07am
  We’ve seen this “movie” before in the 1980′s……1987 to be exact. But it wasn’t Ronald Reagan that used “children’s letters” to take massive action on a major issue of the day. It was someone else we all recognize. (see video below). Start the video at the 1 minute 30 second mark – THE SIMILARITIES ARE EERIE! Especially the scene from the United Nations. Must see
  
  http://youtu.be/OuxiPg4mArk
  
  Report this comment
- phil1765
  Posted on January 17, 2013 at 12:38am
  This is the nudge not the push. It is my belief that they will use the mental health aspect to remove our right to bear arms. It will start out slow with doctors only reporting really deranged individuals, then from there it will be for anyone that has ever visited a mental health doctor or taken a mood altering drug. I hope I am wrong about this, but this administration is all about rules for radicals everything they do has an ulterior motive.
  
  Report this comment
- Dr Vel
  Posted on January 17, 2013 at 1:49am
  rangerskippy you forgot 31.
  
  31 – Mandatory life for gang members using firearms in a felony crime, mandatory death for gang members using firearms involved in any crime resulting in the death of anyone. Mandatory castration of gang members caught with a firearm before they commit any crime. After all we need to reduce their numbers nationwide.
  
  Report this comment
- phil1765
  Posted on January 17, 2013 at 4:45am
  RogueRequest
  You just don’t understand anything about the constitution do you? There is no middle ground when it comes to anything in it. It is written so that anyone with even half a brain can understand it, why are you libs always trying to define it to mean whatever you want it to mean to fit your ideological agendas? If any of the proposed garbage would do anything to prevent further mass shootings without infringing on our rights to privacy maybe I would look at it but I have a tendency not to want to be nudged by your hero. Just ask old Cass Sunstein about that everyone in this administration is all about the nudge to get you headed in the direction that they want you to go, just like the proverbial sheep that you are if you don’t question what these lunatics are doing. My guns are none of your business and anything you do to impede my RIGHT to keep and bear arms does piss me off. You or anyone else will never have a problem with my guns unless you are harming my family or my property.
  
  Report this comment
- dcatkin
  Posted on January 17, 2013 at 8:51am
  More ideas from the king, we don’t need it. Every last one is an ivasion of your proviacy, but that doesn’t matter to king Obama.
  
  If he gets these laws to fly, the next move will be to remove run form the hands of all Americans, and if your used to how things work.
  
  These new laws wil set a president, and make it much easier for him to forward his communist agenda.
  
  No Gun New Gun Control Laws
  
  Report this comment
- G-WHIZ
  Posted on January 17, 2013 at 11:23am
  Did y’a READ the OBASTARDNONCAREACT??? Did y’a READ that ALL PARTS OF THIS BILL ARE CHANGEABLE AFTER IT IS INNITIALLY-PASSED!! Did y’a READ that the WHOLE-ACT was written by the TIDES FOUNDATION AND [NOT] WHERE ALL BILLS ARE SUPPOSEDTO BE MADE IN…THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES!! According to the U.S.A.CONSTITUTION all bills ORRIGINATE IN THE HOUSE-OF-REPS…AND NOT IN THE SENNATE!!
  
  Report this comment
- NewMedia
  Posted on January 17, 2013 at 1:31pm
  Keatonc33 – There is a huge difference between a “nationwide gun ban,” and an “assault weapons ban.” I don’t support either because I believe in the second amendment…..but please knock off the spin! This is a great example of why we need a new media. People like you simply regurgitate anything you hear, whether it’s true or not.
  
  Report this comment
- RogueRequest
  Posted on January 17, 2013 at 1:51pm
  I do not think the government has the right to even know what kind or how many guns I own, let alone have the ability to take them away. Registration of any kind is not an option I can live with. I already hate that so many people are in favor of not allowing people with any kind of mental health issue own a gun. There are states right now making it so ex-servicemen can’t be barred from owning guns because of having PTSD. Barring people who have sought mental healthcare from owning guns will only discourage people from seeking said care. Blaming video games, rap music, movies, TV, race, religion, or anything else is just not going to work. The fact is, there are always going to be people that will seek to do violence and they will find a way. Adam Lanza in world with no guns would have used something else to kill just as many, if not more, people.
  
  Report this comment
- Keatonc33
  Posted on January 17, 2013 at 5:31pm
  Yes onbiously there is a huge difference? whats the point?
  
  Report this comment
LBJDIDIT1963
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:47pm
Is’nt all this stuff with the excpetion of taking about mass murder with your health care provider already in place?st maybe no enforced or they have to S.P.E.L.L. it out for those thay are low informaiton? My idea is, punch a hole in your State Issued ID if you seeking mental health treatment or taking mental health prescriptions, make it the shape of a * astererisk or Daisy, and when presented for Gun Purchase, they are shut down. WHen they copmplete treatment, they need to update thier ID.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- msconstrue
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:59pm
  why not just pin a scarlet letter on to their jackets?……kind of the same idea.
  
  the term “mental health” is very vague, a person could be seeing a health proffessional for all kinds of reasons, most having nothing to do with pyschosis…….i say that it is all a bit too invasive.
  
  Report this comment
- yougottabekidding
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:06pm
  4. Direct the Attorney General to review categories of individuals prohibited from having a gun to make sure dangerous people are not slipping through the cracks.
  
  Holder is in charge of this?
  
  Report this comment
- The Giver
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 9:02pm
  Who will define mental illness? The same leftist psychiatrists that might find an inappropriate temper tantrum mental illness? This country will survive this.
  
  Report this comment
- The Giver
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 9:07pm
  There are many mentally ill people… Just look at Hollywood. Most don’t harm anyone. The left needs to control things even if it makes no difference. Isn’t that a mental disorder?
  
  Report this comment
huey6367
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:46pm
Which state succeeds first? Is this why he extended Secret Service to life for Presidents (read into that a little)?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Sosorryforyou
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:20pm
  All Presidents have received S.S for life, but this was changed in, I think, 1997 so that they would only receive it for 10 years. Pres. Obama changed it back to lifetime, probably because of the amount of death threats he receives daily (sometimes up to 1,000 a day).
  
  Report this comment
- riseandshine
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:20pm
  Nullification is the way to go.
  
  Report this comment
- jeffersonian1776
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:22pm
  Not “succeeds” it’s “secedes”
  
  Report this comment
eat-more-bacon-USA
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:45pm
My favorite ‘action’ is obama’s push to turn medical professionals into government spies. Uh, most doctors’ / medical visits are about 15 minutes – and obama wants medical professionals to waste valuable patient time by having them ask about weapons? Oh please – doctors are going to have a big problem if they spend patient time pushing obama’s idiotic agenda rather than doing their jobs. Once again – obama has proven that he is a sworn enemy of America – we must not let him succeed in destroying OUR country.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- CatB
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:48pm
  With all the ObamaTAX paper work you will be very lucky to get 5 minutes … why bother? Unless I break a bone or have something life threatening .. no thanks.
  
  Report this comment
- AvengerK
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:07pm
  Right out of the soviet play book. Your doctor can now report to Der Kommissar Sebelius (state aparatchik) on your private dealings and your doctor will have “incentives” to do so.
  
  I swear Obama has two sets of toilet paper printed for his use.. one set has the constitution printed on it, and one set has the American Flag.
  
  Report this comment
- Thewayiseeit
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 5:06pm
  Oh, I have an idea….
  
  Dr.: Do you or anyone else have guns where you live?
  Patient: Does you medical practice insurance cover violations of the 4th Amendment?
  
  Dr.: I have to ask these questions?
  Patient: How long will it take for you to collect ALL my medical records?
  
  4th amendment,
  The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
  
  In other words,
  What are you charging me with… Doctor?
  
  Report this comment
- donsfirstwife
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 6:18pm
  When doctor or anyone else you do not wish to tell information to, can we not invoke the 5th like they do in court and not answer the question?
  
  Report this comment
moreteaplease
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:44pm
#16 is especially stupid!

My doctor has no business asking me if I have guns in the home and that’s the answer he will get from me. The Federal Government has more than enough information on me through my doctor, bank, you name it. It’s nobody’s business if I own a gun ( especially the FG ) unless I want them to.

All 23 are nothing more than a power and personal info grab by this communist administration.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- civilwarcometh
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:20pm
  Using obamacare to regulate gun’s and this is what they want to turn it into. http://weaselzippers.us/2013/01/16/house-democrats-file-bill-to-create-socialized-government-run-healthcare/
  
  Report this comment
- Max Power 1
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 9:10pm
  We won a great victory today. Much greater than most folks will ever know. Obama was forced to back off what he had originally planned. This is a MUST read.
  
  http://theulstermanreport.com/2013/01/16/republican-insider-obama-livid-over-gun-rights-backlash/
  
  Report this comment
TIMEBOMB
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:43pm
Dear loyal subjects this is just a partial list of reforms,after I consult with my pawns at DHS FBI TSA IRS
and local pawns I’m sure I’ll come up with a comprehensive plan to strip you of your rights,not just gun rights but all your supposed rights. The final phase will be confiscation and your magnificent gay Marxist ruler hopes ALL of you resist,then I can launch the final solution and rid this country of freedom lovers once and for all. Once all resistance to me is eliminated I will rule over you for life,come on it’s not like you don’t want me to anyway,look at all the idiots that voted for me they can hardly speak intelligible English and refuse to work but they know a dictator when they see one and they want to be slaves. Unfortunately for you normal people you’ll have to be slaves right alongside my brain dead supporters.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- mercenary4freedom
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 7:56pm
  Hey TIMEBOMB, HUSSEIN, when are you going to order another falseflag government operation, another mass shooting by your proxy agents, so you can really gain the momentum from the gullible sheep?
  
  I would think you would want to do this pretty quick so you can really slam the door on us. You think we should stay vigilant and prepare to record the next series of false falg goverment terror, fabricated to instill fear in your subjects? It worked prety good with Hiltler bombing his own Reichstag and attacking his own troops to give credence to invade Poland. Whay say you?
  
  Report this comment
Dougral Supports Israel
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:43pm
Obamacare is going to be his method of attack. He will encourage doctors to pry into a patient’s ownership of firearms, he wil try to categorize every human foible as evidence of a mental health problem and he will use his broad healthcare authority to add all manner of mental health services to insurance policies. The cost of Obamacare will go through the roof!

I am not going to talk about firearms at all with any health professional. Anyone who asks will receive the curt response that it is none of their business.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Southernsoul
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:42pm
This is nothing but round one of a power grab. If a single word of this is allowed to stand, I will promise you will not possess a gun by the end of his reign.

As far as the children used behind him. It is absolutely deplorable to use these children to further a political agenda. These people are the most disgusting human beings on earth.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- AzThunder
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 6:55pm
  odummy is probably fondling them behind closed doors….. he is one sick evil being
  
  Report this comment
- crisnick
  Posted on January 17, 2013 at 1:01pm
  It is deplorable for their parents to allow it.
  
  Report this comment
media-bias-steals-elections
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:41pm
So far members of Congress have basically said, you can have your day in the sun Mr. Obama, but we are not going to consider your requests, much like you threw us out of the debate process over the past four years?

No Congress does not have the money, or the will power, to finance an enhanced spy system on Americans who are supposed to be given the benefit of the doubt as “innocent until proven guilty”?

We are not “clinging to our guns”, we are saying that defending the present laws (not create new laws), is all that is required, and that responsible citizens will lead by example, and they will be followed, not by mandate, but by common sense, and that makes the United States stronger, builds unity, and allows our children to say “Thanks Dad, we did not understand what was going on, but now we know, thanks!”?

I’m sorry would you like me to change the wording so you can call it a personal attack on a politician, when it is an attack on our civil rights?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
spirited
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:40pm
Executive “Action”, yep, that’s to minimize the sound of the word power; yielding.

Isn’t all of this a bit questionable…, in that Fast and Furious has yet to be made public?

>Executive –something or other was used to shield all that Obama/Holder gun-walking

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
DougHuffman
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:36pm
16. Clarify that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit doctors asking their patients about guns in their homes.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ148/pdf/PLAW-111publ148.pdf 906 pages 2.5 MB

Search on “firearm” to find

SEC. 2716. PROHIBITION ON DISCRIMINATION IN FAVOR OF HIGHLY COMPENSATED INDIVIDUALS.SECOND AMENDMENT GUN RIGHTS.— [ ... ]
‘‘(1) WELLNESS AND PREVENTION PROGRAMS.—A wellness and health promotion activity implemented under subsection (a)(1)(D) may not require the disclosure or collection of any information relating to—
‘‘(A) the presence or storage of a lawfully-possessed firearm or ammunition in the r

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
WillG
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:34pm
23 E.O.’s that have no effect on this guy.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- 702TruthSeeker
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:43pm
  said the non-jew german as he watched the german jews shipped off to their deaths
  
  Report this comment
- formidable_foe
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:03pm
  WILLG… Proof that ignorance is indeed still bliss.
  
  Report this comment
high school drop out
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:32pm
Tough talking Obama has caved!!! If anyone really believes this is what he intended all along you are sadly mistaken….An outright ban would have produced quite a backlash!..(believe me they focus group everything!) So by this seemingly sane set of exec. orders he makes us all look like fools! (now he can say “I never intended to ban assault weapons, I told you the N.R.A. was nuts”)…Remember , watch the other hand!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- GhostOfJefferson
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:57pm
  Um, he stated clearly in his speech that he wants Congress to take up the AWB and magazine size limit. Seems we “crazies” were right. Now, we tell Congress “Not unless you want a war on your hands” and see this crap easily thrown into the memory hole.
  
  Report this comment
- panick
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:09pm
  HighSchoolDropout
  
  You’ve got the best take of the lot. Obama proved himself to be fully as much of a cowardly ***** as Rep. Boehner has been recently. But you are also right……watch the other hand.
  
  Oppose, lie and evade cooperating with these snoops. House needs to start defunding a trillion in govt programs and we can have close to a balanced budget. I suggest they start with EPA, DOE, Dept.of Education, and HHS. Nothing these groups do that can’t be transferred to the states. Then we don’t have to endure the circus act of Sibelius and Duncan deciding on who is mentally ill, anyway. It’s liberals who are mentally ill. We know that well. !!
  
  Report this comment
- Wolf
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:16pm
  He made 23 comments about something he knows nothing about- probably can’t even spell the word ‘Constitution’ let alone know what it says.
  
  I don’t care how ‘innocuous’ any of these seem, I say ‘HELL NO!’ to every one of them. None of then addresses the issue, none does anything to ‘stop shootings’, and none of them is any of his ******* business. He can keep his frigging nose out of my business or KMA.
  
  Report this comment
- Pendulumswing
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 6:58pm
  High School Drop Out
  HE KNOWS EXACTLY WHAT HE’S DOING and we are taking the bait!
  I agree with you 100%! It follows same tactics of “Saul Alinsky”. Undermine the opposition, dangle half truths and keep other side in an uproar stumbling and screaming over each trying to uncover all hidden agendas ,his lies, secrets, etc.,. I believe many of the information he refuses to release about his past (birth certificate, college transcripts, papers, etc), is to keep people disgruntled searching frantically to uncover ANYTHING about him and to such extremes (Donald Trump),one starts to look like a lunatic. He holds out/on to things for a reason and when it becomes necessary to advance his agenda, he will discredit all by pulling out a card at the opportune moment, and who looks the fool then? He has reason behind his madness and he is succeeding. This is a fricking smokescreen trust me, after everybody comes out screaming and flailing about, his lapdog media will flock to his side and portray us for being sooo unreasonable…and this IS NOT anything close to what he plans to execute. We are being set up on so many subliminal levels…all undermining tactics to keep us up in arms and appear crazed and uncompromising. Look at how a majority of us have reacted to everything unconstitutional he has done…yet he gets away with! Give someone enough rope and they will hang themselves.
  And I am a GOD fearing American citizen, love of USA and “The Constitution of The United States of Ame
  
  Report this comment
- RJJinGadsden
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 7:19pm
  GHOST, Gotta remember that it was Brady I, and Brady II that had a lot to do with the Democrat House, and Senate bloodbath in the ’94 elections. Just heard that even Harry Reid may not support these measures. There are a lot of Democrat shooters out there too. Just not the trolls that hang out here.
  
  Report this comment
sizzlinsexybeckster
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:31pm
I had a feeling that’s what this was all about. Last year, for the first time, all parents had to fill out forms for the public school systems not just our emergency phone numbers, but including if our homes had any guns. Also, last year, our doctor did the same thing asking us about guns via paperwork. This is all scheduled and planned out at this time for these executive orders to be released and signed… so the school massacre seems really odd because it’s such at a convenient time.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
zetuff
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:29pm
why was it that the mc donald parents,, from sandyhook shooting the only ones invited to this signing of the bill…where are the other 25 different sets of parents and family members.involved .where are these people..? I will tell you..b/c its a hoax..the mc donalds parents was the ones on cnn interview laughing after there child was supposedly killed..in this video,,http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wx9GxXYKx_8

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- bumfuzeled
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 6:39pm
  I was blown away by the link. Made me question everything and start my own investigation.
  
  Report this comment
- CONTUMACY
  Posted on January 17, 2013 at 2:27am
  Don’t worry I’m putting on my tin foil hat, I’m doing my part..lol.
delawarebill
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:28pm
If they implement any of this, I expect to see Eric Holder led away in handcuffs on day 1.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
ZAP
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:27pm
Release a DOJ report analyzing information on lost and stolen guns and make it widely available to law enforcement ////// THEY can start with FAST AND FURIOUS

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
MellonCrib
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:26pm
I really would like to know just what No.3 is all about. It seems to me this alone could grow into a monster.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
WiredRight
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:25pm
Maybe #12 if it includes arming school officials… Most likely though, it was written with a “wink and a nod” for his union buddies?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
progressiveslayer
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:24pm
Looks like twenty three violations of the constitution,I know you Barry worshipers think he can do anything but he can’t. The Marxist trash can write as many EO’s as he wants they’re all unconstitutional.

16. Clarify that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit doctors asking their patients about guns in their homes. It isn’t any business of the government or my Dr. to know if I have a gun in my home, statists are the most vile people,right up there with pedophiles.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- CatB
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:47pm
  http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/thepresidentandcabinet/a/impeachment.htm
  
  The Impeachment Process
  
  In the House of Representatives
  •The House Judiciary Committee decides whether or not to proceed with impeachment. If they do…
  •The Chairman of the Judiciary Committee will propose a Resolution calling for the Judiciary Committee to begin a formal inquiry into the issue of impeachment.
  •Based on their inquiry, the Judiciary Committee will send another Resolution to the full House stating that impeachment is warranted and why (the Articles of Impeachment), or that impeachment is not called for.
  •The Full House (probably operating under special floor rules set by the House Rules Committee) will debate and vote on each Article of Impeachment.
  •Should any one of the Articles of Impeachment be approved by a simple majority vote, the President will be “impeached.” However, being impeached is sort of like being indicted of a crime. There still has to be a trial, which is where the US Senate comes in.
  
  http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2011/3844bill_impeach_obama.html
  
  Report this comment
- zman61
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:35pm
  his whole existence is an impeachable offene
  
  Report this comment
- LittleFinger
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 5:04pm
  23 violations of the constitution?
  
  Nominate and ATF director – HES KILL THE CONSTITUTION
  
  Provide incentives for schools to hire school resource officers. – OMG THE HUMANITY
  
  Launch a national dialogue led by Secretaries Sebelius and Duncan on mental health. HAS HE NO SHAME
  
  Jesus, your such a drama queen
  
  Report this comment
- progressiveslayer
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 7:38pm
  Littlefinger Like I said unconstitutional,try reading and comprehending the constitution and you’ll see I’m correct fool. The BATF and public schools are unconstitutional,try learning something about our constitution.
  
  Report this comment
- DAS_NIETZSCHEAN
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 9:31pm
  we all MUST remember history with “THESE” people….?
  
  “Tell the American people never to lose their guns. As long as they keep their guns in their hands, what happened here will never happen there.” – 1990, a student from Beijing, China, describes the last words of her parents, killed at Tiananmen Square
  
  “All military type firearms are to be handed in immediately … The SS, SA and Stahlhelm give every respectable German man the opportunity of campaigning with them. Therefore anyone who does not belong to one of the above named organizations and who unjustifiably nevertheless keeps his weapon … must be regarded as an enemy of the national government.” -SA Oberfuhrer of Bad Tolz, March, 1933
  
  “Corruptisima republica plurimae leges.” (The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.) -Tacitus, Anals III 27
  
  “The people of the various provinces are strictly forbidden to have in their possession any swords, bows, spears, firearms, or other types of arms. The possession of these elements makes difficult the collection of taxes and dues, and tends to permit uprising. Therefore, the heads of provinces, official agents, and deputies are ordered to collect all the weapons mentioned above and turn them over to the government.” -Toyotomi Hideyoshi, Shogun of Japan, August 29, 1558
  
  “Germans who wish to use firearms should join the SS or the SA — ordinary citizens don’t need guns, as their having guns doesn’t serve the State.” -Heinrich Himmler
  
  Report this comment
AvengerK
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:23pm
So…29 resolutions basically saying enforce the laws on the books already, that a doctor can ask about guns in the house and let’s talk about gun safety and mental health.

In an nutshell….Obama’s got nothing, he’s bluffing and showboating again which is why he asked for the American people to assault (can I use that word?) congress in typical community organizer/agitator style. Barry’s shooting blanks.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
ollie42
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:23pm
He needs to add that Obamacare also includes a section that states that patients do not have to answer questions about guns in their homes.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- circleDwagons
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:44pm
  No!, That is what the Constitution Bill of Rights says
  
  Report this comment
TiffanyRuth
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:21pm
You cannot legislate evil or stupid for that matter. Until parents take responsibility for their kids and get them the help they need or stop over medicating their kids, along with the violence that is all over media, nothing will change. Not to mention that suicides are at an all time high.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- ranepowel
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:29pm
  1.) There’s no evidence that medication leads to violent behavior, but rather the DISEASE being treated with medication is causing violent behavior.
  
  2.) There’s no evidence that shows a link between watching violence and actually causing violence. Rather, there IS evidence that people do things like what happened in Sandy Hook because of the amount of media attention it will get them. They are lonely. They are misunderstood. They lack parental involvement, but hey! The media will make sure everyone knows there name, they will be the talk of the town for months on end, people will finally question what was/is wrong with them, etc.
  
  These people who do mass shootings have mental illnesses that need TREATMENT with medication. And yes, we probably need to institutionalize more people who show violent tendancies. Adam Lanza should have been in a facility where he received round-the-clock supervision and attention, and with possible medical treatment he could’ve lived a long, fruitful life — albeit behind the walls of a mental health institution.
  
  Parents, on both the left and the right, though, would rather not admit that their children have problems, or (infinitely worse) try and solve those problems without medical attention and treatment.
  
  Report this comment
- zapparules
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:29pm
  Then don’t tell me what videos or movies I can allow my children to watch.
  
  Report this comment
- AvengerK
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:38pm
  RANTPOWELL..”a long and fruitfull life albeit behind the walls of a mental institution”. I can see with perspectives like yours why voting for Barack Obama had so much appeal for you.
  
  I’m sure you’d also enjoy seeing the family doctor report any “guns in the home” to Der Kommissar Sebelius right? Especially if he/she and the state are given “incentives” as one of the executive orders states. After all..it’s for our own good..right?
  
  Report this comment
hauschild
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:17pm
Another Communist Manifesto.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- rose-ellen
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:34pm
  It IS like the soviet union-with private citizens-now doctors ,nurses and any and everyone becoming a spy with power to get you on a “list”.Now if I go for a doctors appointment I have to watch my every word so no spy there will perceive me as belonging on their” list.” Disgusting!
  
  Report this comment
- rose-ellen
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:39pm
  It IS like the soviet union-with any doctor or nurse or any one and everyone with the power to put you on a list. Next time I go to a doctors appointment I’ll have to watch my every word so some spy there doesn’t see me as belonging on some government “list”. Disgusting!
  
  Report this comment
- TheCalmOne
  Posted on January 17, 2013 at 1:40am
  Yes, that’s right, it’s a communist manifesto… You don’t actually know what “communist” means, do you?
  
  Report this comment
Gonzo
Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:13pm
Would any of these prevented Sandy Hook?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- GhostOfJefferson
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:19pm
  Not one of them. In fact, they would have prevented none of the 29 major shootings since and including Columbine. This is a list to get us into a database, for them to share that data (aka registration) and to make doctors into the Stasi.
  
  We are under no obligation whatsoever to comply with any of this, and frankly I urge everybody to continue private sales and trade without regard to these extra-constitutional “Executive Orders”.
  
  Do not comply, do not submit. Free men do not need lorded over by a snarky powermonger.
  
  Report this comment
- copatriots
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:20pm
  Good to see you, GONZ. So sorry to read about your dog.
  
  And of course not……even the Progs know it won’t prevent anything. They are merely advancing the agenda of disruption and chaos.
  
  Report this comment
- MangoT21
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:20pm
  Nope…
  
  Report this comment
- TimCotter
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:22pm
  No it would not have prevented Sandy Hook.
  What these will prevent, in the future, is the liberty we have left now.
  It has nothing to do with Sandy Hook it has to do with disarming America.
  
  Report this comment
- Gonzo
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:25pm
  Of course they wouldn’t have, but the lemmings will all cheer him on anyway. Thanks Copatriots.
  
  Report this comment
- CALLMEMSGT
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:26pm
  Not that I can see. I am still waiting for someone to suggest locking classroom doors. That would do more to make the kids safe than all 23 of these “admistrative suggestions” combined. Probably makes too much sense.
  
  Report this comment
- Free_Thought
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:33pm
  I think locking kids in a classroom is against fire laws. I could be wrong
  
  Report this comment
- CALLMEMSGT
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:49pm
  @freethought. I kind of meant lock them from the inside of the room, you know, so you can get out but not in. Think about it!
  
  Report this comment
- AvengerK
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 3:56pm
  CALLMESGT…but to set up those security doors you’d have to take away from teachers benefits packages to pay for them….can’t upset the teachers’ union you know?
  
  Report this comment
- FISH_BONE
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:00pm
  Please excuse FREE_THOUGHT, his name should be FREE_FROM_THOUGHT.
  
  Report this comment
- dublinthewagons
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 4:05pm
  Not one. Let Obama I force them. No that is the job of his servants ATF guestapo
  It seems to me he would be in prison himself for fast & Furious, and the middle east
  
  Report this comment
- Val2652
  Posted on January 16, 2013 at 6:05pm
  OK Let’s look at a couple of problems here. You will need at least two or more gun safes so that guns can be accessible to you no matter where the bad guys enter your home. They would be useless if they are all in the room with the bad guys and you are not. Second point a combination lock should be preferable to carrying your safe key at all times in the home and out, also a combination lock would lessen the likelihood of your mentally ill family member killing you for the key.
  On the question of locking doors one way. A small child must be able to go in and out do you propose that they carry a card or key? Or would you take it a step further and have the children micro-chipped because that would be easier than keeping track of where little Johnny put his key/card? It would be better if there was only one entrance for schools as there is for large firms and that is through the office. Office staff to be armed, or protected by safety shields that would bar entry.
  
  Report this comment

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.