What Aren’t the Feds Telling Us About Their Surveillance Techniques Since Warrantless GPS Tracking Struck Down — and Why
After a Supreme Court decision made early in 2012 ruled GPS tracking constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment, the Federal Bureau of Investigation had to turn off and tried to collect around 3,000 devices. But how is the agency conducting its business now without warrantless use of that technology, which FBI General Counsel Andrew Weissmann called last year a “sea change” for operations?
Based on two memos obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union through Freedom of Information Act requests, it’s clear that the Justice Department (the ACLU originally thought the memos were authored by the FBI) isn’t willing to say much. The ACLU called the heavily redacted memos it received “yet another example of secret surveillance policies.”
“The Justice Department’s unfortunate decision leaves Americans with no clear understanding of when we will be subjected to tracking—possibly for months at a time—or whether the government will first get a warrant,” ACLU Staff Attorney Catherine Crump wrote. “Privacy law needs to keep up with technology, but how can that happen if the government won’t even tell us what its policies are?”
The documents are called “Guidance Regarding the Application ofUnited States v. Jones to GPS Tracking Devices” and “Guidance Regarding the Application of United States v. Jones to Additional Investigative Techniques.” When they’re described as heavily redacted, it means that nothing aside from the text explaining the court decision in the first 57-page document and no body text at all in the second 54-page document is visible.

Screenshot of the beginning of the redacted memo from the Justice Department.
Wired reported the Justice Department defending the extent of redaction of the documents because the information is “privileged and confidential.”
The ACLU pointed out the importance of obtaining more information from the documents because 1) the Supreme Court’s decision, although it said GPS trackers on cars constituted a search, didn’t say explicitly that this search required a warrant from a judge and 2) the decision didn’t address tracking through use of other technology such as cell phones, drones or license plate readers.
“The Fourth Amendment protects Americans’ reasonable expectations of privacy by limiting the circumstances in which law enforcement agents may conduct searches—but today only the executive branch knows what it believes those limits to be,” Crump wrote on the ACLU’s website.
Crump continued stating that the ACLU would continue to fight for the information within the memos to be released.
“The purpose FOIA is to make sure the government doesn’t operate under secret law—and right now that’s exactly what these memos are,” she wrote.
–
Related:
- Privacy Expert Reviews SCOTUS GPS Tracking Case With TheBlaze
- Supreme Court Rules GPS Tracking Requires a Warrant
- So the FBI Is Having Trouble Finding Those GPS Trackers After SCOTUS Ruling Turns Them Off
Featured image via Shutterstock.com.
In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.
















































































































Jamboree
Posted on January 18, 2013 at 10:59pmYour cell phone, ipad, tablet knows where you are and can report location via the Internet, even if you think you have disabled location features. These devices can also be remotely activated to turn on microphone, camera, other sensors. Sudden drops in battery life are a red flag that someone is snooping or has remotely activated implanted software.
Report this comment
@leftfighter
Posted on January 18, 2013 at 4:34pmPair this article with this one and what do you have?
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/18/terrorism-center-at-west-point-warns-against-danger-of-american-limited-government-activists-and-far-right/
I can’t imagine how some folks can’t put these pieces together and see what’s happening right before them.
Report this comment
MGrilla
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 9:38pmI wonder how much it cost (the tax payer’s) in ink to black out all of those pages. Why not just, not print it out and tell anybody that wants to know what their doing to go stuff them selves, and save us some money.
Report this comment
@leftfighter
Posted on January 18, 2013 at 11:51amSo… your idea is, “Let’s tell anyone who wants to know what our government is doing to us to go stuff themselves so we can save a buck?”
Really?
I tend to see the ACLU as an opponent about ten times more often than I see them as an ally, but even I see how bad an idea yours is.
Report this comment
jammer19
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 2:25pmAfter being in the automotive industry for thirty years and seeing all the “advancements” made in technology, you are nuts if you think your car cannot be tracked from any computer. It is sold to you as a way to “unlock” your car, or to get it back from a theif… If they can shut it down to stop a theif…. think about it. And if you think your car or truck is safe because you dont have “on-star”, think again, every main computer in all vehicles can be controlled.
Anything on computer, cell phone, in your car ( hands free phones) , is not safe. BUT most americans are dumb enough to put everything on their facebook pages. Most people aren’t just sheep, they are even dumber.
BAAAAAAHH !
Report this comment
Southernsoul
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 1:51pmThis is what happens when you give the government an ‘inch’. Any law they pass becomes a foot in the door. A day, a week, or a year later it becomes something far more intrusive. Just like the Seat belt Law. In its inception they couldn’t ticket you for not wearing a seat belt unless they pulled you over for something else. Now they look for you not to wear one and ticket you for other things they find. Public surveillance is another example. That quickly became Red light cameras. Soon enough it will be on every street – but just for your protection.
Report this comment
JEANNIEMAC
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 12:28pmIn the movie, “The Dark Knight”, there is a scene showing a flashing sign, “Aurora”. Aurora, Colorado is where James Holmes shot up the theater. Also in the movie, there is a shot of a map. In the lower left hand corner are the words, “Sandy Hook”.
Were subliminal orders being given to Holmes and/or Lanza? The coincidence is very strange.
Report this comment
TelepromoterNChief
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 12:59pmIt was the premier of the movie unless Jimmy Holmes had seen it before, that theory is null.
Report this comment
jhrusky
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 5:52pmPerhaps “they” were telling WE THE PEOPLE what was in store…
Psychopaths love to toot their own horns.
Report this comment
Ohello
Posted on January 19, 2013 at 12:53amIf Lanza was a pawn, then the appearance of those symbolic names could b e lead in the crime.
Three criteria for a crime, Motivation, Capability to execute the crime, Opportunity to do the crime.
What persons or organization has all three of these attributes?
MOTIVATION: Who benefits the most from this event? The communist Agenda promulgated by Barack and his handlers. A final phase of the takeover of the USA is to relieve the American citizens of their guns. Such a crisis is very useful for demonizing and destroying people who daily use their 2nd Amendment rights.
CAPABILITY: The killing of a few children is a small price for “An ends justifies the means” communists and their agenda. The current administration has already demonstrated the capability to cause the deaths of innocent people and federal agents to achieve civilian disarmament. The example is FAST & FURIOUS hundreds of Mexican citizens were killed in an effort to to advance their civilian disarmament agenda.
OPPORTUNITY: The US military & civilian defense specialists certainly have the people, the equipment , drugs,& psych ops training to locate, manipulate, and trigger someone like Lanza to go nuts and do what he did. The Democrat operatives certainly have sufficient funds and perverse moral character to support such an operation.
Report this comment
Xiccarph
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 11:41amLet’s face reality people, the Gov’t has the Power of Ultimate Force. They can do what they want, when they want and how they want. ‘What the people don’t know, won’t hurt them’, is their motto. After all, who’s going to “arrest” gov’t thugs ‘doing their duty’? Do you really think they care or that they will do anything to each other for breaking a rule, let alone the Constitution? There’s always a fall guy, but the system will just change how they do something until any concerns fade away, but they will continue to do whatever they want using any way available to them…and there are a multitude of ‘ways’ we will never know about.
Report this comment
omgfolks
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 12:32pmThis is true, the goverment will always seek out ways to manipulate the laws, this has been a proven fact since goverment has been in place. Citizens in this nation need to push for laws allowing GPS Blockers to counter these actions. In an age of modern tech, citizens need access to tech equipment to assist them in KEEPING THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY which is OWED US under the consitution. That is the sad reality of today.
Report this comment
pahrumper
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 11:40amIt was bad enough when Bush did it but at least George was an American and we know his history but when this Obummer does it and we know nothing about him I don’t trust anything he says or does. I want every thing he does to be closely investigate by congress and by the way,,,,how is the Fast and Furious investigation doing? Sorry Loons, I am not with my head in the sand hoping all is well!
Report this comment
chaos175
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 11:33amI have an ugly question. Do you REALLY care? Would you even know if the government was watching your every move? How many americans went on through there day to day lives without even knowing they were being watched? How much has the government accomplished through secret observation in terms of thwarting terrorist attacks that, by the way you wont hear about because the means by which they accomplished said thwarting was done without the approval of the justice dept, and would expose the expert means the government use to gather such “usefull” information. Are there “bigger fish” to worry abou? Hmmmm…
Report this comment
makamae
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 1:49pmChaos – it may not matter today, when the laws are still somewhat reasonable, but what about tomorrow? If the Dems gain control of the House & Supreme Court, along with the Executive branch & the Senate, what laws might they be able to enact that make something YOU do suddenly illegal? What if they make a law that makes you an outlaw?
Report this comment
toto
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 5:18pmFind it more that interesting that the very demonized John Birch Society of yesteryear, predicted and feared and fought against the very things so common today.
Report this comment
Pat767
Posted on March 19, 2013 at 11:53amGovernment-union-employees do not just follow criminals; they follow political-opponents; they follow people who have complained about a corrupt government action; they follow people they don’t like.
Government-union-employees do not just follow you; they go to your employer and to each place of business you visit; and to your friends and acquaintances; and they slander and smear you.
The government-employees-union is an unconstitutional, self-serving, criminal organization. The bandits of the government-employees-union are wifthout accountability; without morals; without ethics; and are lawless pathological liars.
Report this comment
h20sue
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 11:19amDoes anyone who is reading this, really believe “our government tells us the truth…. or what exactly happens in this country?” Are you living on Mars? They tell us what they want us to know, and that’s it. It’s been the same for century’s. Do you really think Obama cares about American’s and their struggles? Dream on. If he did, he’d start budgeting and stop sending money over seas. We’ve been telling you he wants to see American’s fail,as he wants us dependent on the goverment, so he can rule our lives. When are people going to wake up? His plan is working and people are too dumb to realize what is going on. Look how many states have more on welfare then employed. It’s worse by the day. Eleven states are dependent on government resources. Wake up America, and you’re looking at four more years of he!!….
Report this comment
blanco5
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 11:29amFour more years is optimistic!
Report this comment
jcldwl
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 12:14pmYeah you can forget the 4 more years friend. This last election was a fake. We don’t elect anyone anymore. We just go vote but the results are now controlled by the powers that be. If you think otherwise then good luck in the future. I am awake. Watch Batman The Dark Knight Rises, pause it at 1:58:35 seconds look at the writing on the left side of the map. It looks eerily familiar. I am not 100% convinced of what it says but when I saw it my heart dropped into my stomach. In fact that entire 3 to 4 second shot looks like a coded communication as it has no purpose in the scene at all. Items are strategically placed and there are two hand motions that I believe completes the communication. I would advise people to check it out for themselves. I hope I am wrong but man the times we are in and an administration deeply ingrained with the mantra of “The ends justifies the means.” Leaves we suspicious of just about everything they do our use to further their agenda. They are in constant crisis mode. It is all we hear anymore and that cannot be denied.
Report this comment
common cents
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 11:16amThe Government doesn’t abide by our laws (the Constitution)
Why would they expect us to obey their so called laws ?
Report this comment
blanco5
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 11:29amBecause they still have more fire power and bullets than we do!
Report this comment
justangry
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 11:10amThe people I have voted for didn’t support this stuff. Just saying…
Report this comment
Chuck7884
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 10:57amThey do not need a warrant for gps tracking they use one of the services like On-star. if it is a older model that they have to affix a tracking device then they need a warrant to do so.
Report this comment
WillG
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 10:49amOur Freedoms and Liberties have been under siege for Damn near a Generation. Rung by rung,brick by brick,chip by chip the supposed “Government for the People by the People”have been working feverishly to diminish our once Great Nation. Those of us that are prepared be ready.
Report this comment
The_Woofster
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 10:45amBecause zee new Brownshirts don’t need to tell zee citicenz anything, Ya?!
Report this comment
DougHuffman
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 11:11amPlease, Blueshirts. Brownshirts are so historically NAZI, and Blackshirts Fascisti. The modern Department of Homeland Severity trooper wears blue, a blueshirt or a blue beret.
Report this comment
The_Woofster
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 12:15pmYou sir, are correct! These ARE modern times!
I stand corrected : Blue Shirts!
Report this comment
Mil-Dot
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 3:04pm“Your papers please. Give them to me NOW!”
Report this comment
DougHuffman
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 10:40amThe Electronic Privacy Information Center EPIC.org knows and has a fine track record in use of FOIA demands. Drones – http://epic.org/2013/01/epic-hosts-event-on-drones-and.html GPS Location privacy – https://epic.org/privacy/location_privacy/default.html
Report this comment
PIGSWILLNEVERFLY
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 10:38amWelcome to the skinny zero’s second term of tyranny unplugged and unleashed. Was it Jarrett who vowed “punishment” to all their enemies?
http://www.gulagbound.com/36895/obama-congress-ending-the-usa-to-establish-the-new-police-state-part-1/
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 10:38amWelcome to the growth of Big Brother and Big Sister.
Report this comment
TelepromoterNChief
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 1:01pmWeight jokes for fat Janet are always good.
Report this comment
IndyGuy
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 10:31amThere is now available to law enforcement and the Gov. drones the size of flies…Regular sized drones are already deployed throughout the U.S…..1984 Gov. style spying was just a few years off…
Report this comment
SanDiegoCountyCitizen
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 10:42amSize of flys?
Um… not outside the the minds of scifi writers. A drone the size of an insect is not viable anyway… to many birds ready to take them down!
Report this comment
IndyGuy
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 10:49amIt is a reality…
Report this comment
IndyGuy
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 10:53amhttp://www.geek.com/articles/geek-cetera/air-force-seeks-to-be-fly-on-the-wall-with-new-drones-20111111/
Report this comment
dublinthewagons
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 11:01amThey need to make a drone the size of a gerbil and let it run loose up B.O.’s rectum,
With a feather
Report this comment
Red Meat
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 10:28amDear Liz,
Some help.
What Aren’t the Feds Telling Us About Their Surveillance Techniques Since Warrantless GPS Tracking [WAS] Ruled Unconstitutional — and Why
You’re welcome.
Report this comment
13th Imam
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 10:59am?
You’re Welcome
Report this comment
taxpro4u03
Posted on January 17, 2013 at 11:06amIt appears the Spock 2nd Generation gets corn – fused believing grammar is a female elder of their Mom or Dad… maybe It’s a metaphor — (or a place to keep cows in) – tower of ‘Babel’ it is nationwide, nonetheless.
Report this comment