Posting Shortly: State Sen. Says CSCOPE Will be Yanked in Texas
As Heard on Beck Radio: Wait Until You Read that Poem By One of Those Punished for Benghazi Lapses
Sen. Ted Cruz: Obama Started Trying to ‘Exploit’ Newtown Tragedy ‘Within Minutes’

AP
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Sunday accused President Barack Obama of starting “within minutes” to “exploit” the Newtown, Conn. elementary school massacre for political gain.
“Within minutes of that horrible tragedy in Newtown, the president began trying to exploit that tragedy to push a gun control agenda that is designed to appeal to partisans, designed to appeal to his political partisans,” Cruz said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”
Obama’s only vow on the day of the shooting last month was to take “meaningful action” to prevent future tragedies. He formally rolled out his gun control proposals last week, which included calls for new bans on “military-style assault weapons” and high-capacity ammunition magazines.
Cruz said the new proposals “would have done zero to prevent the crime in Newtown.”
“Number two, many of the provisions are contrary to the constitutional protections of the Second Amendment, and number three, they don’t work,” he said.
Cruz, who was elected in November with Tea Party support, has been at the forefront of the anti-gun control fight. On “Meet the Press,” he called the expired assault weapons ban one of the “least successful bills that has ever put in place.”
“When the ban expired there were roughly 700 murders using all rifles,” he said. “Today there are roughly 300, that’s less than half — this is not designed to actually solve the problem of violent crime, this is designed to assuage liberal partisans who want to push gun control.”
Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.







































































































Comments (119)
zoro51
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:16pmonly a psudeo socialist dictator would do such.. IMPEACH N THROW OUT OF THE USA NOW OBAMA SAVE AMERICA FORM THIS RAPIST
Report this comment
Ohello
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 1:04pmHe acted on it within minutes….. I see… that means he must have known about the event in advance in order to exploit it so quickly. I wonder if he or any of his transparent organizations had any role in institgating and helping Adam Lanza go berserk and do what he did. Drugs? Pych Ops?
Plausible…. BHO is already a murderer by association to FAST & FURIOUS.
Report this comment
kryptonite
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 1:08pmMethinks you meant to say, “Throw Obama out of the USA now,” followed by a period or exclamation point.
Report this comment
Keatonc333
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 1:24pmOk before we get all conspiracy crazy. This is just word from some senator against gun control. He wasn’t with Obama within minutes of the shooting. He probably didn’t see him all day. And all Obama did that day was pledge to take meaningful action. Its just an attack by the senator to try and demonize and make illigitimate the gun control debate.
Report this comment
Keatonc333
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 1:25pmAlso had no idea Yoda was a crazy conservative
Report this comment
honeydijon13
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 1:36pmCruz is Canadian born
Report this comment
banjarmon
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 1:41pmJust thinking….Drugs and the DRUGS the killers were using…Check the records of their Doctors, and the prescribed drugs these people were on. Hold the Drug companies responsible for the bad side effects and the death caused by the use of their medicine!!
Report this comment
battles
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 2:16pmCruz may be Canadian born, but he is a 100% Constitutional American and Texan! He at least knows more about what our Constitution says that Keynesian born Obama.
Report this comment
VanceUppercut
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 2:29pm@zoro51
Yes, because a dictator would allow the opposition to put the kibosh on important legislation the dictator wants passed. Because that’s what dictators do. And as far as exploiting a tragedy, perhaps this guy never heard of Dubya, or ol’ 9/11 whore Rudy Giuliani.
Report this comment
Witness1974
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 3:09pmWhen the diminutive mayor of Chicago said, “Never let a crisis go to waste,” did anyone think he was kidding? These are ruthless people, capable of the lowest, most cynical kind of behavior. This guy will exploit any opportunity to wound the nation so that his rage against it will be assuaged. I think it is abundantly clear that he is bent on the destruction of America. For you doubters, quit listening to what he says and start watching what he does. He is a liar, a fraud, and a despot as tyrannical as any of the monsters we witnessed in the 20th century. If not for the millions of guns in the hands of millions of people who are willing lay down their lives for the defense of the Constitution you would see him exercise raw, hateful, and bloody power like the worst of them.
Report this comment
Gold Coin & Economic News
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 3:27pmGotta love Ted Cruz, he’s not afraid to say it like it is. Saw him on Meet The Press this morning and he is 100% spot on!
http://www.isthatbaloney.com/ted-cruz-of-texas-says-obama-has-drunk-the-kool-aid-and-is-high-on-his-own-power/
Report this comment
SendTheMeteors
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 7:52pmActually the President of the United States did not make a statement “within minutes.” That is a flat out lie, obviously false on the surface. Just going by memory here he spoke publicly seven or eight hours after the murders. I guess “within minutes” comment was meant to bring out and support the conspiracy theorists, as provably false as that statement is (even Romney waited a couple of hours before blaming President Obama – not terrorists – for the Benghazi attack). In any case, Presidents generally address issues after national tragedies. It’s a new phenomenon to call that “exploitation.”
I appreciate the smart politics of claiming that talking about gun after mass murders with semi-automatic guns with high capacity clips are “exploiting” the dead and saying that it’s disrespectful to the people with their brains blown out to make any comments about gun control. It’s smart that those event happen so regularly that, according to this logic, no one can ever talk about gun control.
What’s ironic about Cruz’s statement that is that he says he’s offended that the President spoke about gun control given all the bullet ridden dead kids, he, in the same interview expressed support for the NRA position that President Obama’s kids should be DEAD center in the gun debate, you know, because they have Secret Service protection. He’s okay with the President’s children being brought into the scope and says that’s not “exploitation.”
Report this comment
woodyee
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:10pm@ DonsFirstWife, and EVERYBODY else – from the article in Pravda:
“Moscow fell, for example, not from a lack of weapons to defend it, but from the lying guile of the Reds. Ten thousand Reds took Moscow and were opposed only by some few hundreds of officer cadets and their instructors. Even then the battle was fierce and losses high. However, in the city alone, at that time, lived over 30,000 military officers (both active and retired), all with their own issued weapons and ammunition, plus tens of thousands of other citizens who were armed. The Soviets promised to leave them all alone if they did not intervene. They did not and for that were asked afterwards to come register themselves and their weapons: where they were promptly shot.”
Report this comment
gyro
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:17pmhistory repeats
Report this comment
woodyee
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:18pmTo those with Lilliputian minds (Leftists/Libs, and gullible ‘Bamaphone!’ voters) –
The ones who complied with turning on their own – in this case, turning their backs – were among the FIRST ones eliminated…AS USUAL.
Know your history, because we’re being warned by those in the know, that it is being repeated.
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:32pmWOOD: The unmistakable signs of lying, anger, hate , manipulation, and division characterize our the Chicago radical Democrats who follow those Marxist Rules For Radicals – just another Far Left Bible of destruction.
Report this comment
ginger100
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:41pm@woodyee
So the moral of the Pravda story is to not to trust commie, marxist, socialist, progressives, anyone who wears a shirt with che guevara or a clenched fist on it. OK
Report this comment
kryptonite
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:45pm@WOODYEE
Brazil is a Venezuelan satellite. Of course Barack is giving them financial aid, but they are already under commie control. Most of Latin America has been taken over by Chavez. Barack can’t openly endorse Chavez, but he and Hillary are fond of visiting his satellite countries.
Report this comment
woodyee
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:50pm@ Ginger – in a word – yes.
They vote. Their votes get us where we are today, and, historically, often lead us towards what we’re being warned about. As to the Che shirts. “Generally” speaking, folks who wear shirts like that get their NEWS from twitter, oprah, facebook, high school teachers and college professors, and vote accordingly. A TWIT from Twitter influences more than say, a bit of news the 95+% accuracy in truth from Rush Limbaugh., so, to re-iterate –
YES.
To those of you with Che shirts – Get over it. Che is dead.
Report this comment
woodyee
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:53pmHOWEVER GINGER – that is NOT the point of the Pravda Story. If you’d read it, you may have posted a different comment. Thanks for the entertainment.
Report this comment
JohnofOregon
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 1:00pmPage 23 of the democrat party platform. Ban guns. National registration and regulation. How come republican leaders cannot point this out.
If you a democrat, you do not support the second amendment. Pretty simple.
Report this comment
kryptonite
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 1:26pm@JOHNOFOREGON
In re your post:
“…back in 2008, Democrats attempted to downplay then-candidate Barack Obama’s hostility toward gun owners and our Second Amendment freedoms by putting this line in their party’s platform (emphasis added):
We believe that the right to own firearms is subject to reasonable regulation, BUT WE KNOW THAT WHAT WORKS IN CHICAGO MAY NOT WORK IN CHEYENNE.
In this year’s platform, however, Team Obama has shortened this passage to read:
We believe that the right to own firearms is subject to reasonable regulation.
Gone is any mention of Chicago. That’s because life in the criminal utopia that Obama helped build there is not pretty.
When he was a candidate and lawmaker from Southside Chicago, Barack Obama endorsed a complete ban on handgun ownership.
He also voted to ban most commonly owned rifles and shotguns, and even voted against legal protections for people who used firearms to defend themselves or their families from deadly attacks.
Despite a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that declared Chicago’s gun ban unconstitutional, the city’s stifling restrictions on gun ownership make it nearly impossible for law-abiding citizens to use a firearm for self-defense.”
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2012/09/07/democratic_platform_calls_for_more_gun_control_omits_awkward_reference_to_what_works_in_chicago
Report this comment
woodyee
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 1:51pmThank you, Kryptonite, for the info. ;-)
Report this comment
kryptonite
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 7:12pmWOODYEE
We the People are socialists now. We firmly believe in sharing the wealth… of info we have available. :)
Report this comment
T-2
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:02pmWho is this chinaman? He should just punch Chuckie in the face.
Report this comment
Jaynie59
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:01pmThat interview was infuriating. Ted Cruz had the perfect opportunity to go on the offense with David Gregory and he didn’t do it. He could have destroyed Gregory’s credibility by simply asking him why he didn’t play the entire NRA ad. Or better yet, demand he play the entire ad to expose Gregory’s hypocrisy and obsfucation f the fact that the ad showed HIM as being one of the elites who send his own kids to private schools with armed security. And THEN Cruz let Gregory get away with saying Obama’s kids are protected by the Secret Service. David Gregory sends is kids to the same schoo the Obama’s send ther kids to. Sidwell Friends. It’s been all over the place that they have 11 armed guards.
Republicans should require that all of their elected officials go to Media School before going o television.
What a wasted opportunity.
Report this comment
Ohello
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 1:13pmBe interesting to see what this ELITE SCHOOL for the RULING CLASS teaches about communism vs Constitutional government….. Bet the Obama babies are Marxists just like mom and dad.
Report this comment
truthnstuff
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 1:36pmYou are so right. These conservatives that have started to do better in the media are still way to PC to make a difference. They have to get together and learn how to take the commies down and completely loose the defensive posture. Go for the throat every time they open their commie mouths.
Report this comment
Metallicat
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:00pmThey were pointing fingers before the investigation was over and trampling on it by flooding the public with falsehoods. as always they silence the investigators, and the MSM presents the facts as Obama and his cohorts see them,to provide them with political leverage to push anything on the progressive liberal agenda.every chance he gets,Obama jumps in the pool first and pees in the water before anyone else can test the waters. How many investigations has this administration corrupted to protect Obama and his people?
Report this comment
stopprintn
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:54amObamer is getting sworn in, if they post the story we should not open it. You know, who cares
Report this comment
honeydijon13
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 4:29pmAnn Romney does.
It’s Mitt’s time.
Report this comment
woodyee
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:54amTed is correct. It is obvious to all not wearing the blinders of the Left, that Obama is exploiting Sandy Hook as a means to an end of one of his goals – diminish 2nd Amendment Rights. There are folks who are sending us outright warnings from AROUND THE WORLD, telling us NOT to allow Obama and his cultists to have their way.
Last week, there was the warning from Pravda. Here is a warning from Australia – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGaDAThOHhA
COPY. PASTE. DISSEMINATE. Repeat.
Report this comment
woodyee
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:56amHere’s Pravda, in case you wanted the story – http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/28-12-2012/123335-americans_guns-0/
Report this comment
donsfirstwife
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:04pmThe left says we need these restrictions. However, these restrictions will not stop anything, not murders of one or many at one time. Obama’s 23 plans are just gathering all the information as to where the guns are so they can easily be confiscated when the next ‘crisis’ comes along.
Report this comment
gyro
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:15pmwoodyee = they are voting on gun control this month in brazil because of the school shooting there (in april think)were 12 children were killed 10 of them girls each shot in the head one at a time no asalt rifle used
fallow the brazilian vote and you can see how the left twists it around
happy obama day ! :)
Report this comment
woodyee
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:27pmGYRO – There is an “American” union organizer down their helping them with socializing their workforce. Also, don’t doubt for a minute that American Taxpayer Dollars are working hard in Brazil for gun control.
The Pravda article exposes the American Government as having aided the Soviets come to power in Czarist Russia. Sen. McCarthy wasn’t the only one that was right – it appears that the John Birch Society weren’t the Chicken Littles’ that the lame-stream media and politicians made them out to be.
Report this comment
Journalist
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:52pmAnd there are those like China and Mexico who are saying we should control guns in the US. I wonder what they know they can do if there are no armed citizens to resist them.
Report this comment
murphdog
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:54amOh to be in Texas. Here in Utah we have what is called “Senator Hatch”
This Moron does nothing, say’s nothing, and his head is so far up that guys ass, he reeks of Socialism.
Time to move.
Report this comment
Mil Mom
Posted on January 21, 2013 at 6:29pm@sinner-saint
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:53am
The liberal marxist communists are pushing the whole gun control agenda to disarm the People because they are afraid of of the People. That is a good thing and they should be afraid. They realize they cannot move forward with their power grab and communist agenda as long as the People are armed and can fight back. The rational for gun control and the measures they desire to implement make no sense and will not work.
Here’s what will work. All school campuses should be fenced with a brick wall fence (to prevent students/faculty from a shooter off campus) with one main entrance onto the school campus. An armed school guard (s) should be stationed at the main gate entrance. Student and civilian vehicles will not be allowed on/in the school campus. they must park off campus. All employee and vendor vehicles coming onto the school campus get searched by the gate entrance guard. All people must walk through the main school campus entrance and go through a metal detector. Mutliple metal detectors and turnstile entrance ways can be employed. This way, no gun or other metal weapon can ever make it onto a school campus. All bags/backpacks/brief cases would be hand searched.
***
You do realize you’ve just described the average PRISON don’t you. We turn the criminals and wacko’s free to terrorize the nation and PUT OUR KIDS IN PRISON TO EDUCATE THEM!!! Way to go left, it looks like you’re winning!
Report this comment
sinner-saint
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:53amThe liberal marxist communists are pushing the whole gun control agenda to disarm the People because they are afraid of of the People. That is a good thing and they should be afraid. They realize they cannot move forward with their power grab and communist agenda as long as the People are armed and can fight back. The rational for gun control and the measures they desire to implement make no sense and will not work.
Here’s what will work. All school campuses should be fenced with a brick wall fence (to prevent students/faculty from a shooter off campus) with one main entrance onto the school campus. An armed school guard (s) should be stationed at the main gate entrance. Student and civilian vehicles will not be allowed on/in the school campus. they must park off campus. All employee and vendor vehicles coming onto the school campus get searched by the gate entrance guard. All people must walk through the main school campus entrance and go through a metal detector. Mutliple metal detectors and turnstile entrance ways can be employed. This way, no gun or other metal weapon can ever make it onto a school campus. All bags/backpacks/brief cases would be hand searched.
Protecting a school campus is relatively easy and straightforward by using physical barriers, controlled entrance ways, the proper technoloy and security measures. Our current mental health laws should be enforced. We don’t need more laws…..we need the laws we already have to be enforced.
Report this comment
guz75
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 2:29pmOK. So that the big children can keep their toys, the actual children must be educated in a prison camp. If what you’re describing doesn’t sound f**cked up to you, then you need to get out more.
Report this comment
Berbel73
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 6:05pmHey Guz what sounds more “messed” up to you. To ban all weapons from both in and around a school leaving all those inside defenseless, or to have armed guards at the school who can respond in an instant to any threat. The liberal progressive elites in this country send their children to schools that have armed guards, but want to deny average Americans of the same protection for their children. I mean if you have a brain in your head the answer is an obvious one. However you prove once again that the progressive liberal argument is not based in reality but only on emotion and is bereft of any logical thought. To liken armed security for the protection of America’s children to a “prison camp” is completely and utterly ridiculous.
Report this comment
Guitar Master
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:49amzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
From THE REPORTER
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Couldn’t see the entire interview. When the guy next to Cruz started speaking I became very nauseated and had to run to the bathroom to heave my guts out.
Report this comment
G.E.R
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:47amI’m curious where all you supposed patriots were when in Oct. 2001 George W signed the patriot act that effectively ended your 1,4,5,6,7,8th amendment rights. Where was your protest for that?
Report this comment
Libertarian
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:58am@G.E.R.
That is a fair argument.
I was screaming from the highest room top. I was against it then and against it now. I was also against, GWB creation of the Department of Homeland Security. I was against ALL of the bailouts.
Some of us are intellectually honest.
Report this comment
murphdog
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:58amThis country changed so fast, not in decades but a few short years. Glenn says it has been a movement since the 1800s, but the truth of the matter is, never will the people be caught off guard again, if that answers your question
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:10pmG.E.R. : Divide the Conservatives works just swell for the arrogant Democrats. Witness the swearing in of the international / Chicago radical president. For the SECOND time…
Report this comment
BlackCrow
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:13pmRather the Patriot Act or round up every Muslim in the country and ship them to Saudi Arabia?
Report this comment
truthnstuff
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 1:40pmLIBERTARIAN……Well said. We were against Bush’s liberty grabs also.
Report this comment
honeydijon13
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 4:32pmThat way over their heads.
This is the Attack democrats and Obama site.
Report this comment
Libertarian
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 10:33pm@blackcrow,
Strawman argument.
You give two fallacies and say pick one. You think it will be a Muslim invasion or cracking down on our liberties like we have seen in every other country in this world?
What you are insinuating is wrong, that we can implement something completely irrational if the right person is in power. This is the New Deal to liberals – liberals claim that all of the entitlement programs would have run great if their had just been a progressive dictator in power for the last 80 years. The problem with that is we have a Republic form of government where people are elected democratically. Thus instituting long term programs to “secure” the future for elderly or “protect” us from terrorists is completely irrational. These acts were done under the guise of security & safety. Now we have bigger government, we are not safer and both parties leading us there.
Blackcrow don’t measure a bill, law or program by “who” creates it because Democrats and Republicans can make government bigger. Measure from a philosophy, because it is then done from principle and consistency.
Good luck
Report this comment
Exidor
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:42amTed Cruz is absolutely right. Gun control was the first thing out his mouth.
He immediately ramped up his ongoing campaign mode.
Report this comment
Maji
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:53amAgreed!
Report this comment
db321
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:03pmIt was easy, Obama had this Gun Control campaign ready to go and on the shelf since Fast and Furious . F & F blow up in his and Holder’s face and he now stands om the graves of inoccent school children.
Obama will never be able to fundamentaly change America fully unless he gets the Guns.
Report this comment
tothepoint
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:40amThat’s the MO of Obama and his gang.
They exploit tragedies and children and then cry ‘foul’ when someone mentions obama’s children.
They are Hypocrites and ghouls.
Report this comment
kryptonite
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:12pmBut as always, the pundits on the right go with the Obamamedia narrative. For example, Krauthammer, who has a lot of clout, condemned the NRA ad.
Pray tell me why? No one denies that Barack’s children are a prime target. HOWEVER, given the tacit go-ahead the Barack Gang has given to those contributing to social chaos, all the children in America are now potential targets BECAUSE all gun-free zones are now potential targets.
Anyone acquainted with terrorist tactics knows that there is no better target for a terrorist than a child. So thanks to Barack’s nonaction in the face of anarchy both at home and abroad, ALL children in America as well as ALL Americans abroad are especially vulnerable to terrorist attacks.
The NRA ad was spot on. Barack is a hypocrite, a conniver and a vile worker of iniquity.
Report this comment
momrules
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:32amAfter the initial feeling of horror after hearing of the Newtown murders how many of you just KNEW that this event would be used as a gun grab moment by the left? I thought it and shortly after was proven correct in my assumption by Obama, his media hacks and his political allies.
Mr. Cruz is correct.
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:11pmMOM: Exactly. We were still suffering from Zimmerman Media syndrome.
Report this comment
13th Imam
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:30amNever let a crisis go to waste
Report this comment
RDavis49
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:39amAnd if you don’t have a convient crisis at hand to further you agenda, simply create one…. just go have somebody killed, poison a river, burn some trees, dump some nuke material somewhere… etc., etc….
Report this comment
RIGS
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:30amHEY!!!!!!!!!!!!! All you republicans that stayed home instead of voting for romney because he wasn’t conservative enough or he was a mormon WELL you got what you deserved 4 more years of the biggest phony and marxist ever elected.
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:37amRIGS: They were the so-called ” let the country have a revolution so we can fix it” which is also part of the radicals’ plan to destroy the capitalist system so that they can ” fundamentally change” the economic system. These guys share the same dysfunctional love of destruction.
Report this comment
Shasta
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:40amAnd don’t forget the Paulbots, who threw their vote away, to ensure Romney’s defeat and teach us all a lesson.
Report this comment
justangry
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:17pmOh you guys are cute. Romney’s record on gun legislation was appalling, yet you all think it would somehow be different? You’re all a bunch of Beohner style republicans…. Might as well be democrats blaming others for your parties inability to get enough votes to beat a president with such a stellar record. Pfft!
Report this comment
AUsername
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:17pmif Romney was elected ignorant conservative wannabes would have allowed romney to do the same because they thought he was different. our guns might be restricted by now if Romney won, still glad he didn’t.
Report this comment
AUsername
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:19pmFYI samething will happen if Rubio, Christie or Bush get nominated.
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:28pmI only hope that conservatives battle this all out BEFORE the next campaign. Only if conservatives UNITE and organize will they have a chance of beating the international radicals who now control the Democrat party . They have international best buddies , tons of money , AND the liberal international media behind them. That is how Obama got droned into the White House in the first place. Fight now. UNITE later! Our only hope. Division will mean disaster AGAIN…and the Chicago radicals will play that angle AGAIN….
Report this comment
kryptonite
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:36pm@RIGS
That’s a lie! How else would they explain Barack’s win? His arenas were half-empty. The polls showed a very tight race that could go either way. Even women had come to their senses and were switching to our side. It was Barack’s disenchanted voters who stayed home, NOT ours.
Please wake up. The election was rigged. You cannot believe one freaking word the media says.
Report this comment
13th Imam
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 1:47pmJust goes to prove that the Taker Class has grown huge, and they vote in droves for freebies. The DEMOCRATS have bought these votes with stolen Taxes of actual workers. This will END , Soon
Report this comment
iampraying4u
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 2:32pmRIGS amen
Report this comment
justangry
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:23amI hope this guy’s voting record will match his rhetoric. Seems like a good one.
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:44amVerify then trust. Never trust anyone whom you do not know. Make them earn the trust. Stop jumping on a band wagon just because it sound’s good.
Report this comment
momrules
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 12:02pmMorning Just. I voted for Cruz so I really hope he does not let us down the way so many do after they get into office.
Report this comment
hersey10
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:21amLove him.
Report this comment
chips1
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:21amObama thrives on the death of children. It’s his form of child pornography.
Report this comment
iampraying4u
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 2:29pmhe is also the lier in chief
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:20amWe know that the Chicago radicals will not ” waste a crisis ” to push their agenda : remember the Zimmerman Media circus ? remember the “video caused the 9/11 protests” media fiasco ? The Obama Chicago radicals and their propaganda arm, the MSM, are molding a ” new, fundamentally transformed, changed ” America. That is quite ” transparent ! “
Report this comment
RDavis49
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:19amIMO that’s because he and his Chicage goons were responsible for the murders of those innocent babies and adults. I totally believe that the government was in some way behind every sing mass killings since 2011 for one resons on another. I know no one wants to think in those terms about their elected officials, but the big power players are ruthless, sneeky, cold hearted and masters of lying and deception. They will stop short of nothing to achieve their goals and if you, I, or even school children need to be sacrificed to those ends, it bye-bye baby. Open your eyes America, you’re under attack from within.
Report this comment
OldSurfRat
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:18amCome on Ted get you facts straight it was within seconds not minutes.
Damn cant trust anybody anymore :)
Report this comment
Triple7
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:26amSeconds? No, before the last shell hit the ground.
Report this comment
OldSurfRat
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:37amAgreed
Report this comment
I_AM_HARRISON_BERGERON
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:59amVery funny, but let’s be honest. I think that anyone with two functioning brain cells that share at least one neuron a day knows very well that this was well in the works even before the Liar-in-Chief tried to claim that he would not be trying to violate the Second Amendment during the debates last fall. His body language clearly showed that even though he was expecting it, it was a “gotcha moment” and he had to go into spin recovery mode and resort to rehearsed talking points. The tell is the funny pinching gesture that he so often does with his fingers. This is his outward manifestation of mentally referring to his notes when he cannot speak openly and honestly about a topic.
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:18amTell me something i don’t know about obama spill the bean’s.
Report this comment
CatB
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:18amHe is absolutely correct .. Obama and the Dems and MSM were blaming guns (not the mentally deranged shooter) before those children’s bodies had even been removed from the school .. it was a VILE and DISGUSTING display of never let a crisis go to waste.
Report this comment
RDavis49
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:29amYou got that right……………. they could care less about the deaths of those babies and adults… their total focus and goal was specificlt to get people all fired up about guns so they can go for the 2nd amendment rights of American citizens. These people cannot be trusted to be honest with us. Everything they do we get lied to about, or the truth is with held until THEY decided we can be told about it. We have a communistic government administration in place and they need to be removed from office.
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on January 20, 2013 at 11:16amWhat else would you expect from Obama, he cares nothing for the people of America, only on how he can ‘punish us’ for being a successful Republic and crush us into becoming a communist state.
Report this comment