Watch Live: Obama’s Counterterrorism Speech
‘#24forOK’: Doc Thompson Begins 24 hour radio marathon to Benefit Oklahoma Tornado Victims!
McDonald’s to Pay $700,000 to Muslim Groups Over Islamic Dietary Law Dispute

Photo Credit: AP
DEARBORN, Mich. (TheBlaze/AP) — McDonald’s and one of its franchise owners agreed to pay $700,000 to members of the Muslim community to settle allegations a Detroit-area restaurant falsely advertised its food as being prepared according to Islamic dietary law.
McDonald’s and Finley’s Management Co. agreed Friday to the tentative settlement, with that money to be shared by Dearborn Heights resident Ahmed Ahmed, a Detroit health clinic, the Arab American National Museum in Dearborn and lawyers.
Ahmed’s attorney, Kassem Dakhlallah, told The Associated Press on Monday that he’s “thrilled” with the preliminary deal that’s expected to be finalized March 1. McDonald’s and Finley’s Management deny any liability but say the settlement is in their best interests.
The lawsuit alleged that Ahmed bought a chicken sandwich in September 2011 at a Dearborn McDonald’s but found it wasn’t halal — meaning it didn’t meet Islamic requirements for preparing food. Islam forbids consumption of pork, and God’s name must be invoked before an animal providing meat for consumption is slaughtered.
Dakhlallah said there are only two McDonald’s in the United States that sell halal products and both are in Dearborn, which has one of the nation’s largest Arab and Muslim communities. Overall, the Detroit area is home to about 150,000 Muslims of many different ethnicities.
The locations advertise that they exclusively sell halal Chicken McNuggets and McChicken sandwiches and they have to get those products from an approved halal provider, Dakhlallah said. He said there was no evidence of problems on the production side, but he alleges that the Dearborn location on Ford Road sold non-halal products when it ran out of halal.
Dakhlallah said he was approached by Ahmed, and they conducted an investigation. A letter sent to McDonald’s Corp. and Finley’s Management by Dakhlallah’s firm said Ahmed had “confirmed from a source familiar with the inventory” that the restaurant had sold non-halal food “on many occasions.”
After they received no response to the letter, Dakhlallah said, they filed a lawsuit in Wayne County Circuit Court in November 2011 as part of a class action.

Photo Credit: AP
The AP left messages Monday afternoon for attorneys representing the corporation and the franchise.
In the settlement notice, Finley’s Management said it “has a carefully designed system for preparing and serving halal such that halal chicken products are labeled, stored, refrigerated, and cooked in halal-only areas.” The company added it trains its employees on preparing halal food and “requires strict adherence to the process.”
He said although Ahmed believes McDonald’s was negligent, there was no evidence that the chain set out to deceive customers.
“McDonald’s from the very beginning stepped up and took this case very seriously,” Dakhlallah said. “They made it clear they wanted to resolve this. They got ahead of the problem.”
The lawsuit covers anyone who bought the halal-advertised products from the Ford Road restaurant and another Dearborn McDonald’s with a different owner between September 2005 and last Friday. Since that would be impossible to determine, Dakhlallah said both sides agreed to provide money to community-based charities that benefit members of this group.
The other location on Michigan Avenue wasn’t a defendant or a focus of the investigation, Dakhlallah said.
He said the final hearing will ultimately determine who gets what and how much, but roughly $275,000 is expected to go to the Huda Clinic, about $150,000 to the museum, $230,000 to attorneys and $20,000 to Ahmed.
Dakhlallah said he believes it’s the first lawsuit of its kind related to McDonald’s and halal food — one that surely sparks both controversy and discussion.
In 2002, McDonald’s agreed to donate $10 million to Hindu and other groups in the U.S. to settle lawsuits that accused the chain of mislabeling french fries and hash browns as vegetarian. The vegetable oil used to prepare the items had contained traces of beef for flavoring purposes.
In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.


















































































































Comments (210)
oldsoldier10
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 3:34pmhttp://www.mcdonalds.com/365black/en/home.html Get what ya deserve McDonald you are a terrible institution!
Report this comment
toomuchgovt
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 3:32pmSo let me get this straight – a Christian kid can’t pray in school b/c it might offend some atheist or muslim kid, but McDonald’s is suppose to pray to the animals before they slaughter them?
I have a solution – Don’t eat at McDonald’s it is a private business. Why the heck did they settle? I think I will go into a Muslim Restaurant and tell my husband to order a Kosher meal.
Report this comment
jhrusky
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 4:35pmAnd if you can find a Kosher meal listed in a muslim restaurant and it is actually not kosher, you’ll have a case.
Unbelieveable that false advertising is OK with so many here when it’s against muslims.
Report this comment
oldsoldier10
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 3:29pmMcDonalds — http://www.mcdonalds.com/365black/en/home.html racist corporation, happy they fail!
Report this comment
Hamsterama
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 3:28pmGranted, the consumer has the ultimate right to drive the market, why the hell would ANYONE with ANY sort of dietary restrictions even attempt to eat at McDonalds?
Report this comment
oldsoldier10
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 3:28pmHAHAHA McDonalds http://www.mcdonalds.com/365black/en/home.html gets what they get. I would not eat at McDonalds if I got the Difference of the Deficit from 2009 – 2013. McDonalds is a racist institution and like the college professors gettin their hours slashed deserve what they get! http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/01/22/Universities-slash-teacher-hours-to-evade-obamacare I am Sick and heading to the Ubombaployment office to register for disability and kcik back. My only grip is that it is just $700,000 why not $7T and let’s end this litle debt problem, just issue all EBT for payment to McDonalds. McDonalds http://www.mcdonalds.com/365black/en/home.html RACIST shisters!
Report this comment
taintso
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 3:12pmNext they will sue because they make food that will fit in the left hand’
Report this comment
Elisheva
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 3:05pmBefore you reply to my last comment JHusky….Go Eat a Knat Bogger!
Report this comment
ThoreauHD
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 2:50pmMuslims.. ahh just waiting for the civil war. It’ll all sorta itself out soon.
Report this comment
HollyW
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 2:49pmMcDonald’s always caves. According to a report in the Daily Rash, San Francisco city supervisors only agreed to allow the sale of Happy Meals after McDonald’s OK’d back-room fisting in selected restaurants around the city. http://www.thedailyrash.com/san-francisco-allows-happy-meals-after-mcdonalds-oks-backroom-fisting
Report this comment
Hamsterama
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 3:40pmBeing as the San Francisco ruling involves the digestive tract, does this mean that the two Dearborn stores must have all fists meet Halal requirements?
Report this comment
demsrtraitors
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 2:48pmallowing islam in your country is like allowing the HIV virus in your body. It will eventually kill the host.
Report this comment
TexPat
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 2:46pmDetroit – Muslims, Unions, Socialist, Communists, Progressives, Crime… Just the place to open a business or faction to. NOT
Report this comment
mcsledge
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 2:42pmIdiocy. Yes, let’s go to a fast food restaurant for religiously prepared food. Idiocy.
Report this comment
jessieH
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 2:41pmHey, McDonalds. Just add more pork to the menu. I hear they love pork.
Report this comment
iampraying4u
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 4:35pmfree pork samwich to all mooslims
Report this comment
Elisheva
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 2:34pm@jrhusky (whatever your name is) Uh the last I checked this is AMERICA we dont Conform to terrorist to suit them…!
Report this comment
jhrusky
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 2:42pmWhat are you talking about?
Yes, this is America. If a company FALSELY ADVERTISES, they risk being sued when caught.
What part of that concept is too in depth for your mind to grasp?
Report this comment
Hamsterama
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 2:34pmYou know, I like the idea of telling Muslims to speed up their trip to hell as much as the next guy, but if Micky-D wants to advertise that a ju-ju stick has been waved over the chicken carcass to get the Muslim business, then they have to abide by the same advertising rules as everyone else. That being said, I’d be willing to bet that lighter-skinned religious folk wouldn’t get the same “justice” from the stupid “white guilt” fools that have permeated the court system.
Report this comment
Elisheva
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 2:30pm@JHRUSKY Laugh all you want …That is Until O Bans Laughing.
Report this comment
Frederick_Douglass_Republican
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 2:26pmDearbornistan
Report this comment
RoguePO
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 2:16pmDon’t like it; eat elsewhere.
Report this comment
pap pap
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 2:03pm“”Detroit-area restaurant falsely advertised its food as being prepared according to Islamic dietary law.””
If they said it would be prepared that way then they had a responsibility to prepare it that way. They just should have kept their mouths shut and not advertised it that way then they could it eat it if they wanted to or not. Chicken is Chicken this whole thing is ridiculous.
Report this comment
cantstandlibs
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 2:02pmWe need a sign indicating without ambivalence that it is NOT HALAL. That way any Muslim even ducking through the doorway would possibly be identified by a neighbor, etc. I’d just rather not share space with the cro-magnon cult of death. They can go eat somewhere else and take their gibberish with them.
Report this comment
strawberry411a
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 2:00pmComing to an American city near you…..standby.
Report this comment
ainthurtinnobody
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 2:00pmI don’t care to much about the monetary settlement but the truth in advertising. It’s good to see that in this age of Saturdaynite Live mentality where everythings a joke that some people still take some things seriously. Ask an orthodox Jew what he thinks about this. I just bet he would applaud what the Muslims did. This ruling can goes far beyond just helping Muslims we need truth in all our advertising and labeling. Many companies are feeding us crap, you know peeing on our leg and telling us it’s raining. So I agree with the Muslims in this case. Go get ‘em tiger.
Report this comment
DYNA
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 2:35pm@ainthurtinnobody
The food that the Muslims were eating was not poison. If their god is good and powerful, he can deliver them from food that is not poisonous. Get a refund for the food purchased and eat elsewhere.
I’m thinking they were more interested in the monetary settlement more than truth in advertising.
It is amazing how so many in our litigious society initiate lawsuits seeing themselves as noble victims, when what a conicidence, there is handsome monetary reward.
Report this comment
holy ghostbuster
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 1:54pmMcDonald’s deserves what they get for trying to appease those “living in the dark ages” Muslims. How do they know the butcher didn’t invoke Allah’s name before slaughtering the McChickens? I’m sure the butcher said something like, “Allah-Damn” this **** stinks. From The God Virus, “What makes people blind to the irrationalities of their own religion yet see clearly the problems of other religions?”
Report this comment
spfoam1
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 1:40pmA lawsuit to force McDonalds to hire muslims to serve muslims is next. We can’t have an infidel contaminating the food by touching it, now can we?
Report this comment
Tom Ballard
Posted on January 22, 2013 at 1:40pmHow stupid,
Report this comment