Watch Live: Congressional Hearing on IRS Scandal

Live BlazeCast at 2pm ET: All the fireworks from the IRS Hearing!

Media

Female Shooting Champion Returns to ‘Hannity’ to Debunk Gun Myths

Jan. 23, 2013 8:17am Billy Hallowell

Champion Shooter Jessie Duff Returns to Hannity on Fox News to Chat About Guns, AR 15s

Sean Hannity (left) and Jesse Duff (right) (Photo Credit: Fox News)

Competitive shooter Jessie Duff appeared on Fox News’ “Hannity” last week, where she showcased her marksmanship skills. On Tuesday night, she returned to the show to talk about gun control initiatives, clarify how semi-automatic weapons operate and to debunk some myths about firearms. As for this latter point, the champion shooter addressed misconceptions that often-times color individuals’ views about guns.

“These are all semiautomatic firearms and when you pull the trigger once it fires once,” Duff said. “They don’t spray bullets everywhere like you see in Hollywood or in the movies or video games.”

The shooter also attempted to explain that the AR-15, which is the weapon that has received the most scrutiny of late, isn’t actually as sinister as media accounts have portrayed it. Among other elements that sometimes get lost in translation, Duff noted that the context surrounding the gun is often misrepresented in media.

“There’s just a miscommunication of what the AR-15 really is,” she said. “You hear the term assault weapon or assault rifle and it’s used to often in the media, but they’re using it, in my opinion, in the wrong context.”

(Photo source: http://www.jessieduff.net)

Duff explained that an assault rifle is fully automatic and will “fire rounds until the feeding device is empty,” whereas an AR-15, contrary to the ideas that have been advanced by some gun control advocates, does not have this capability. In addition to making these clarifications, the shooter also expressed concerns about clip limitations and other restrictive proposals.

Watch Duff’s comments, below:

This champion knows what she’s talking about, too. According to Duff’s web site, she has won global and domestic championship shooting titles. From the Bianchi Cup to the Steel Challenge World Speed Shooting Championships, the shooter has made a name for herself. In addition to competing, Duff also educates the public — as she has done in her “Hannity” appearances — about the elements surrounding the sport.

You can also see her in full competitive form during the 2012 USPSA Limited Nationals, below:

Here’s another clip of her competing during that same event:

If you want to learn more about Jessie, consider looking into “Friends of NRA,” a television show that she and her husband, former Major League Baseball player Matt Duff (St. Louis Cardinals), host on the Outdoor Channel. Find out more about the program here.

(H/T: Mediaite)

–

Related:

Watch as This Woman Proves She Knows More About Guns & Marksmanship Than You (Probably) Ever Will

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (97)

cemerius
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 12:59pm
Sweet!! Gotta love hot chicks that shoot!!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- ArchaicSEAL
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 3:09pm
  Not to mention that fully automatic is pointless. In the military we were taught and trained to fire semi-auto with tight weapon control. If you did flip your select fire to repeating it was because you were entering a CQB environment and wanted to have the ability to snap fire a short burst at the blink of an eye in case you got surprised in that tight of an environment, and even then most of us would stay in semi. Most people don’t realize how much trigger control this takes in combat when others are trying to kill you… the normal human response when surprised by a threat with a firearm is to clench up and squeeze down on your trigger and just spray rounds aimlessly until you click dry. You end up missing the target entirely, or winging the target without eliminating its capacity to fight back and then you are dry and have to reload or go to your secondary, which gives your target plenty of time to calmly turn you into a sieve.
  
  In combat we never really had a need for fully automatic, except in the case of suppression fire. And no one really needs to provide suppression fire in everyday life America… except perhaps in the case of invasion or civil war, and even then you can simulate the effect with three people firing semi-auto rifles repeatedly at a focus of fire.
  
  Report this comment
- Wolfgang the Gray
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 5:54pm
  When I was in the service in Germany, I had the chance to do a soldier exchange & spent a week with the Germany Army. I got to shoot the MG-42 machine gun. The emphasis was quick trigger pulls to shoot no more than 3 or 4 rounds (tough to do at a rate of 1200 rounds per minute). I was delighted to score marksman level with it.
  
  This lady is a great source of facts to debunk the lies that the anti-gun nuts are spewing to get people to side with them.
  
  Report this comment
TotallyNotATroll
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 12:59pm
She’s pretty hot too, think she’s single and wants an older out of shape man?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- PK_SEA
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 1:42pm
  She’s married to MLB player Matt Duff. So probably not.
  
  Report this comment
- Joe_The_Patriot
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 4:59pm
  That dood got himself a KEEPER……
  
  Report this comment
- Jake Dog2
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 8:13pm
  Yes one lucky doooooood
  
  Report this comment
mikew85120
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 12:44pm
OMG a GIRL with earrings and painted fingernails!! What next, burping a baby!! It just shows, not all gun toters are knuckle draggers

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
sandrunner
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 12:29pm
Obama does not want women to defend themselves.
Obama wants submissive women…his wife is another matter. After sharia law comes into effect then he will force his wife to be submissive.

But first things first…Guns…free speech…change Christianity to Islam and kill all gays and people with tattoos…and force submission to all women.

Then Obama will be happy.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- I support God's Israel!
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 12:36pm
  Naw………. I believe the majority of freedom-loving Americans will take to the streets in a civil war and THEN will the left be able to see what a REAL GUN FIGHT LOOKS LIKE.
  
  Report this comment
- tommytruck
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 12:36pm
  So true – If those women who were gang-raped in Tahrir Square had been armed, I imagine they never would have been attacked.
  
  Report this comment
Johnny Cocheroo
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:48am
Wow. That couldn’t possibly have been a reload at the :12 second mark, reloads are supposed to take like 13 seconds, needs to put the gun on a table and be very clumsy.

Side note, I will be heading out with my father-in-law to some gun shows to pick up a handgun & eventually get a concealed carry. I have no clue about where to start with handguns. Anybody have any recommendations?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- NewCreationDave
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 12:08pm
  5-shot .38 snub-nose is ur backup gun.
  How ur gonna carry determines ur primary.
  U can put a sub-compact 10-round 9mm in a pocket holster. Everybody will have different advice but the Springfield Armory XD-9 fits the bill (so do many others).
  Forget anything less than a .38 or 9mm. I know, I know, it’s all about shot placement – but why carry a .22 or .35 or .380 when it’s just as easy to carry something with more stopping power?
  They will tell you to get the biggest gun you can handle. Primarily, that has to do with target re-acquisition. But honestly, most people can handle a .45 just as easily as a 9mm. My wife is one.
  Don’t get ridiculous with a .44 magnum or .50 or whatever. I’d say stick with the following calibers: .38, 9mm, .40m .45 (auto). You can get 10 rounds in a .40 or .45 compact but again, how you’re gonna carry will be a huge factor. I have all of the above and prefer the (arguably) best-of-both-worlds .40 (my SA XD-40) which has the higher velocity character of the 9mm yet the higher stopping power of the .45. The .40 and .45 I have to put on my hip. The .38 and 9mm I can put in my pocket. Go to a range and shoot some rentals. Ask around. You’ll figure it out. Oh, one more thing. You may get steered to a revolver cuz semis are “less-reliable” and jam. Hooey. Get a quality gun and learn how to use it (and how to clear a jam IF it should happen). I have speedloaders for my revolver but greatly prefer to carry a semi with a couple
  
  Report this comment
- beachj11
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 12:14pm
  @Johnny
  I carry a Ruger LCR .357 Magnum and I love it. Its small enough to fit comfortably in your waist or even in your jeans front or back pocket. It will shoot .38, .38 special, and full load .357 magnum. I like to shoot .38 and .38 special at the range as it is cheaper and doesn’t kick very bad. I carry loaded with .357 for self defense. I’ve carried a few other firearms but this is the one I always fall back to.
  
  Report this comment
- JRook
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 12:18pm
  “This champion knows what she’s talking about, too.” Among the intelligent are non-ideological driven citizen there is no myth about guns. Guns are used everyday in the US to kill people. Gun ownership is a protected right embodied in the 2nd amendment. But to borrow a conservative phrase with rights come responsibilities. So let’s keep it simple and avoid myths on both sides of this now infantile discussion. ALL guns should be registered and tracked from the point of manufacturing to the point of sale. The registered owner at each step should be held both criminally and civilly responsible for any crimes their gun is involved in, unless they report it stolen within 72 hours. Gun sales should be handled like car sales with the new owner re-registering the gun at the time of purchase. The debate is being kept at these myths and other stupid talking points to avoid the obvious requirement that there be universal background checks, 100% gun registration and 100% responsibility. And yes law abiding gun owners would have none of their rights limited. But let’s keep in mind in a large proportion of the gun crimes in the US, the individual was regarded as a law abiding citizen right up until the time they pulled the trigger.
  
  Report this comment
- NewCreationDave
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 12:20pm
  Oops – fat-fingered the “.35″ – I meant .25 caliber
  
  Report this comment
- TH30PH1LUS
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 12:24pm
  Johnny Cocheroo,
  
  Welcome to the responsibility and liberties of gun ownership!
  
  BEFORE you purchase a firearm, I would recommend you go to a combination range/gunstore. They should have some “range guns” of various makes and calibers for you to rent and test out. A range instructor, or well-versed friend can assist you in becoming familiar with different handguns.
  
  Find a gun that is comfortable for YOU. Then look into purchasing.
  
  Report this comment
- thorkyl
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 12:59pm
  I recomend you find a local range/shop that has rentals.
  Rent one or more at the range, try them find one that is comfortable, easy for you to load and shoot.
  
  If you purchase one that is not comfortable to shoot, then you will not practice with it.
  
  Buy what you like to shoot, what is comfortable to shoot and that you can shoot accurately.
  
  Report this comment
- KevINtampa
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 1:32pm
  #1 There are several reliable gun manufacturers to choose from. Everyone has their favorites, one day you will too, but there’s A LOT of personal preference. Finger a few guns, rent a few guns, consider the climate you will be primarily carrying in (hot or cold), decide how you will conceal, purchase your gun.
  
  #2 I would stay away from the exotic rounds. A Herstal FiveSeven is a beautiful gun, easy to fire with little recoil, rifle like ballistics, and a carrying capacity of 20 rounds. IMO it’s a great investment gun for collectors. Unfortunately each round will cost you $0.60+, and that’s when you can find it. At 20 round capacity, it’s $12.00 to fire one magazine practicing at the range. Bottom line, go to your local gun shop or Walmart and look at what they stock. You’ll find .38, 9mm, .45, and .380. Buy a gun that fires an easy to find and affordable round.
  
  ***CONSIDER THE COST OF AMMO BECAUSE YOU WILL NEED A LOT OF PRACTICE AND EVEN TARGET ROUNDS COST $$$***
  
  #3 FWIW Right now my favorite carry is the Smith & Wesson M&P Compact 9mm.
  
  #4 A revolver like a Smith & Wesson J-frame Airweight is also a good firearm. .38 revolvers are nice carry pieces for several reasons. You don’t have to worry about about a magazine spring wearing out. With a shrouded hammer they can be fired more reliably from say a jacket pocket with out worrying about a slide pinching the cloth and getting mucked up. There’s no flying piping hot brass to consider either.
  
  Report this comment
- miller721108
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 1:42pm
  Starting light and economical may make your entry into the shooting community an easy transition. And welcome. A .22, while not at all a weapon I would personally carry concealed, is a great way to start. The rounds are cost-effective, you’ll be able to familiarize yourself with the operational mechanic of firearms, plinking targets is a boatload of fun and the cost of the weapon itself is very affordble in most cases. Once comfortable and familiar with how you shoot start working your way up the caliber and power ladder to see what works for you. The .357 is good and, personally, I have become a recent proponent of the .40 with a good mix of stopping power, round cost and breadth of weapons available. As many other folks will tell you, the .45ACP is a great one, too.
  
  Report this comment
- Joe_The_Patriot
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 1:45pm
  @JCROK
  Registration leads to confiscation!!!!!!!!!!!!! history has shown that again and again..
  4% of gun crime are commited by lawful GUN OWNERS…….. the other 96% are commited by Criminals whether they had a prior criminal record or not makes no difference…. No measure of gun contol is going to make a single bit of differnce to criminals, It’s only going to make more helpless victims…. Criminals DO NOT OBEY THE LAW !!!!!!
  
  Report this comment
- John.Galt
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 1:58pm
  @JRook – Funny you lib-tards never acknowledge ho often GUNS ARE USED TO STOP CRIMES.
  
  I guess you want you your mother, grandmother, and daughters to be subjected to the will of anyone stronger than they are. Great, when your loved ones get raped and murdered (not necessarily in that order), you can continue to act like you are morally superior.
  
  On a side note, I am looking foward to the lib-tards bankrupting the country. I will enjoy watching the lib-tards kill each other over scaps of food. Best thing is, I won’t have any blood on my hands… unless some of the lib-tards try to harm me, my family, or take my stuff. Then the foxes in the back woods will get some nice free meals.
  
  Report this comment
- rolla020980
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 3:12pm
  Jrookie,
  So, I would have 72 hours to report my gun stolen or I will be charged with a felony? How would that hold up? So, lets say I need to travel to Chicago for work, so I leave my gun at home. I give my alarm code to a trusted friend, who goes in my house and feeds my cat. He forgets to set the alarm and leaves. That night, my house is broken into and my gun stolen. That A-hole uses my gun to rob a liquor store. All of a sudden federal agents knock down my hotel door and arrest me because I didn’t report my gun stolen. Maybe they should arrest me when my car rams a police cruiser after it is stolen from the airport parking lot. Your argument is to criminalize the law-abiding citizen. Typical liberal.
  
  Remember, gun control means hitting your target.
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 3:33pm
  Johnny
  Like many have said, a .38 to start. Can’t beat a decent .22 for practice and acclimation-cheap to shoot. A .357 frame revolver is great because you can step down to .38… lots of info, get a decent range to provide an NRA instructor.
  
  Rookie is a troll, don’t engage the worthless troll. Let it wither on the vine of irrelevancy.
  
  Report this comment
- Al J Zira
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 4:15pm
  Rook: Are you that dimwitted? You said; The registered owner at each step should be held both criminally and civilly responsible for any crimes their gun is involved in, unless they report it stolen within 72 hours. Gun sales should be handled like car sales with the new owner re-registering the gun at the time of purchase.
  
  Your contradiction is self evident. You want gun owners to be responsible for the actions of others, then you compare it to car sales. So if you sell your car and someone uses it to run down his ex-wife you would be criminally responsible? Doesn’t even have to be the guy that bought the car, it can be anyone.
  
  And where did you get the stat that the people that people were law abiding citizens until they pulled a trigger? Since the majority of gun crime is committed by gang bangers, I don;t think your theory holds water. The Sandy Hook shooter would never have gotten a gun with the laws that already exist. Not too familiar with those law abiding gang bangers.
  
  Report this comment
- mixplix
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 4:35pm
  A 22 LR semi pistol, you can get what they call a brick of shells (525) very cheap and when you get your trigger control polished up go to the bigger guns. A 50 round box of 9MM will set you back about twenty bucks, some times more sometimes less. A 50 round box of 45 cal is $34 the last time I looked. A revolver will slow you down from shooting too much ammo, it all gets expensive depending how much you like the sport.
  
  Report this comment
- idrathermisstotheright
  Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:56am
  Get what you will carry. People will tell you to get this or that because its better or bigger. The important thing is to get a gun you will actually carry and not leave at home. I don’t care if its a 22 pistol it’s better then a fork.
  
  Report this comment
- Johnny Cocheroo
  Posted on January 24, 2013 at 8:00am
  Appreciate the info.
  
  I didn’t even think about renting before buying.
  
  Report this comment
spfoam1
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:39am
The reason this administration, and the communist architects behind them, want to ban AR-15s is because that is the most popular rifle in the USA today. If they can effctively take out the most popular rifle in the country, confiscating the rest of the firearms will be easy.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- EDD702
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 3:49pm
  @JROOK I disagree with you on the registration of the firearm with the Gov..
  This was the first thing A. Hitler did in the early 1930s mandate that all weapons must be registered with the central Gov. then all they had to do was look at the records an go get the weapons or demand they be turned in an if you didnt U were arrested .
  I would put nothing past this adm. when it comes to enslaving the average person on the street. That goes for both the Rep. an Dem. seems when we send people to DC they lose all respect for the law an the people of this country it becomes all about the power.
  
  Report this comment
YOURSENSEI
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:27am
This is what you must know:

Conveniently, no one is discussing the effect of velocity, only the size of the entry hole. But as serious and responsible gun owners, you surely know all about this – penetration rates, degrees of fragmentation. You’ve all seen those really groovy ballistic gel tests. But no, just like Hannity, you get in front of a beautiful woman and you start asking like a bunch of third graders. (Psst. Here’s a hint: Women prefer a confident man, not a repressed, quivering puddle of schoolboy angst.) Grow a pair, geez you guys are a bunch of nancy boys.

Next time you see her, you know, after you unload in your pants, ask her what makes the bigger entry hole, a Mac truck or a Tomahawk cruise missile?

It is so.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- DIR
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:50am
  Interesting commentary about the girl. Sounds like projection to me. Nice magic act wango.
  
  Report this comment
- Mil-Dot
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 2:14pm
  Don’t worry wango, you will get your chance to meet us. It is going to go down. We will not forget what your ugly mug looks like when we find you. Classic keyboard commando. All mouth.
  
  Report this comment
WatchingThePuppetShow
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:27am
Can I say how HOT this woman is! I wonder if she’d marry me!? LOL

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- YOURSENSEI
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:50am
  Mr os Ms WATCHINGTHEPUPPETSHOW,
  
  This is what you must know:
  
  Not a chance. She’s gay.
  
  It is so.
  
  Report this comment
- Joshua81
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 1:49pm
  If by gay you mean she is married to a professional MLB player then yes, she’s flaming
  
  Report this comment
dont_drive_slow_in_the_left_lane_obliviot
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:00am
that’s all well and good but the truth has no place in liberal politics so it won’t matter.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
BlasberryStrat
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:44am
Closer Look:
It just hit me while reading one comment about “the black rifle”, and thinking about it caused everything to fall in to place. Do you think “they” are after the “black rifle” (AR .223) SIMPLY because it “looks” just like the guns used in most (very) violent video games? They want the pistol and forward grips removed. They want the rails and laser sights removed. They actually want the color changed. Many have probably thought about this only because the gun “looks scary”. BUT is the removal of this weapon due to the similarity DOES TRIGGER a “kill or be killed” reaction in these nut balls? And do the big brain doctors CONFIRMED this as FACT, but are under gag orders BECAUSE: The amount of revenue achieved by selling hundreds of thousands of “video games” to ALL ages is much greater than that of selling a few thousand AR’s to those over age 21! These big brains may KNOW that the mass killings ARE being ‘triggered’, but Gov. revenue is dictating that the ‘games’ keep selling and the ‘real’ gun be banned. If you really think about the AR ban in this way, everything falls in to place. Plus isn’t it par for the course that our Gov. will allow (push) citizens brains to be scrambled by “living within virtual worlds”, because they only see the millions in taxes coming in from the billions spent on the games and updated players. A “real” gun will last generations, but a “game” only lasts one season. Get it?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- NOTYERHUCKLEBERRY
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:41am
  You are so correct about the “black rifle”. Before the Clinton ban, I saw a man on one of the daytime shows. He was trying to show the audience that not all weapons are what you think they are. His example was the Ruger 10-22. He held one up, wood stock and all, and asked if anyone saw anything wrong with it. The answer was, no. He then took the stock off, replaced it with a folding pistol grip stock that was black. He put a 25 round magazine in it, held it up and asked again. The answer was, YES. It now “looked” evil, even though it was the same rifle.
  
  Report this comment
- Wolf
  Posted on January 24, 2013 at 9:53am
  For an example of NotYourHhuckleberry is saying, go here… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=–br564pRH8
  
  A simple 60 second change…
  
  Report this comment
toledofan
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:26am
At the end of the day, no matter the fact or common sense, the politicans think they can regulate everything and they are trying their best to look like they care. But, until they themselves give up their weapons, or those used by their body guards, then they just need to shut up, because , they can do almost nothing to prevent these types of killings. It’s the classic do something scenerio, even if it does nothing to solve the problem, do something to show you really care and make sure you say it enough so people believe you.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Silvertruth
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:41am
  Yes, but it needs to be boiled down further than that. Just look where the ‘discussion’ starts.
  
  Gun Control starts with an emotional basis:
  
  “Guns make me afraid, therefore guns are bad.” (Now list all reasons why guns are bad)
  
  Pro-Gun adovates:
  
  “Guns are a tool that secure freedom and safety.” (Now list all reasons why guns are good and useful)
  
  One side uses pure emotion, the other a combination of rational base thought and emotion (safety).
  
  Before anyone accuses me of a straw man argument, I have asked many gun control fans, over a dozen and when getting down to ‘brass tacks’ every single one of them was afraid of firearms. Either they didn’t ‘like’ them or they outright feared them. Their fear kept them from wanting to learn them or interact with them which means they felt unsafe, at the mercy of those with firearms. So, from their perspective, the only way to feel ‘safe’ was to remove the firearms from everyone else- no matter how noble or trustworthy they were.
  
  Gun Control politicians use this fear to control those that suffer from it, including themselves. Feinstein probably has nightmares about being shot on a nightly basis. Can you blame her for being so vocal?
  
  Everyone with a rational brain knows that if we eliminate violent behavior, gun violence goes away with it. Gun Control is a wedge issue, used for power. See it for what it is, understand it, and govern to common ground. We should be talking common ground here.
  
  Report this comment
- Letthebulletsfly
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:16am
  I really don’t care if politicians get rid of their guns or armed guards. Because others choose not to exercise their rights doesn’t mean I have to give up mine.
  
  Report this comment
lessoneleg
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:25am
regardless of the Pro Gun people may so or express. The hard line Anti Gun groups — have — the ear of the Senate and the Divider-In-Chief Obama. This isn’t about anything other than “they have you in their crosshairs, and they fully intend to put it to NRA types”. This is one of the leftists crowning jewels of social engineering. And the progressives fully intend to crown their tiara’s with one more of their jewels.
First jewel in their crowns, was to install a Non American person (Obama) as President. Then they wanted another biggy, putting it to gun advocates, jewel 2, immigration is 3, etc.
The Progressive approach has been to isolate groups like NRA as social misfits, mentally deficient fools. And by the use of their large base MSM, they’re doing a pretty darn good job putting MotorCity Nugent on TV ranting like an idiot playing right into their hands. You can’t get articulate well educated people onto the liberal MSM describing a counter discussion. This was to invent a crisis, and ram rod a baseless regulation into the public before the general population knew they were duped.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Joshua81
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:47am
  You are right that this is their plan, one thing everyone seems to forget is that we have guns. Have you ever tried to take a gun from someone that didn’t want you to take it? I doubt it. Plus, there are millions of us that have guns, and most people that have a gun have more than a few. They can put whatever they want on a piece of paper.
  
  Report this comment
Teaple
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 9:47am
Sean, how many clips in a magazine? Please learn the terminology or you’ll be mistaken for a clueless liberal

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Gonzo
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 9:57am
  He’s has a carry permit. He’s not clueless, he just got tongue tied.
  
  Report this comment
- GroundZero is Nuclear Demolition x3
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:15am
  The NEED argument was used by Carl Marx to get Russia to accept Communism.
  
  Report this comment
- Redhawke
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:22am
  Stop flipping out over simple terminology mix ups. It isn’t that important and those of us in the know, know what he meant.
  
  Report this comment
RaydocX
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 9:36am
Mrs. Duff shot well with Hannity yammering in her ear the other night, and presented a cogent factbased discussion of ‘the black rifle’ and the general misconceptions (willful or out of ignorance) being pushed by the fools in the media and politics.

Sadly, none of it will be heard by the deaf Left… if they cannot push through infringing legislation in this first half of the King’s second term, they will patiently wait for their media lap dogs to so demonize the GOP that the Congress is returned to the Dems in the mid-term elections and O has his way with everything in the final two years…

the only thing that can prevent that is the hastening of the destruction he intends to occur during his watch and sufficiently severe that even the sheeple and the media drones have to admit that this is not an America they can endure.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Mil-Dot
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 9:14am
My last post got smashed because I mentioned the Illuminati and how they are somehow related to the Sandy Hook con job. Everybody please rent the Batman movie “The Dark Knight Rises”. Pause the movie at 1:58:35 and read the two words written on the map just to the left of the walkie-talkies. It says “Sandy Hook”. Read up on the Illuminati and what they are all about.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Plutos_Pal
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 9:41am
  What’s your point? There are no fewer than 10 “Sandy Hooks” in the U.S. and Canada (not including the school in Newtown CT) – islands, cities, villages, etc. It is a common name.
  
  Report this comment
- VRW Conspirator
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 9:57am
  Apparently Mil you have never read a Batman comic or paid that much attention to the numerous Batman series that have come and gone over the past 80 years in the comic book world.
  There is a “bad” section of Gotham…a section that used to be upscale and nice….that has become the slums…where all the drug houses and projects and poor usually are sequestered.
  One street in this neighborhood is where Bruce Wayne’s parents were gunned down. Bruce/Batman returns there once a year on the anniversary to lay roses with his friend, an elderly woman with the same name as Katie Holmes’ character from the movies. She was not his love interest but a surrogate mother figure, like Gordon and Alfred were surrogate father figures.
  
  Sandy Hook is a part of that neighborhood along with Arkham Asylum, the seedy underbelly docks where all the criminal element hang out, all the rundown and abandoned buildings, and the like.
  
  Comic book writers often through in “real life” places to make their comics more real. Marvel actually uses real city names and landmarks. DC has chosen to alter the names: Gotham = New York but then again, so does Metropolis, but in the Smallville TV show, Clark was able to drive into Metropolis from Kansas easily in one night and get home, which makes Metropolis more in the location of St. Louis.
  The point being..no conspiracy..Sandy Hook has been in Batman LONG before the shooting.
  
  Report this comment
- Mil-Dot
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 2:08pm
  Gentlemen,
  I spend my time doing more productive things with my time than reading all the batman comic books and going and seeing those crappy movies. That’s kid stuff guys. But, if that is what you like to do, this is a free country. Well, at least for a while. My point was to cause folks to look into these “Illuminati” goons. They are pulling the big strings. But, since you are too busy reading comic books, I guess you will never know about them.
  
  Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 9:05am
Back in the mid ’80s I ran the pistol range for our BN. We had an odd sized BN with 7 companies at the time, and I ran the range for close to 7 weeks in Baumholder, Germany. We had quite a few women who were excellent shots and that was with some really old M1911A1s. A few were still a bit afraid of the .45 and it’s recoil, but with a little off the line training and coaching they picked it up and handled it well. Many of the women did better than most of the men, but the frame and grip tends to fit a woman’s hand better. I think that it would be fun to shoot with this woman sometime.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Mil-Dot
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 9:11am
  I think it would be fun to shoot with her ANYTIME-day, night, weekends…… The girls got class. I like her.
  
  Report this comment
- 00100111
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 9:26am
  Women typically have better hand – eye coordination than men. With proper training and the desire to do so, I’d expect many women to surpass men at marksmanship. I love to see women shooting, it’s great knowing they can take care of themselves.
  
  Report this comment
- YOURSENSEI
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:17am
  Mr or Ms MIL-DOT,
  
  this is what you must know:
  
  Sorry, she like s men who shower regularly. But hey, I hear Momma June is available. More your speed.
  
  it is so.
  
  Report this comment
Mil-Dot
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 9:04am
Everybody,
When you get a chance, rent the Batman movie, “The Dark Knight Rises”. At 1:58:35 pause the movie and read the two words on the map, to the left of the walkie talkies. It says “Sandy Hook”. This is no joke. I know I am probably way late on this . Check it out. It is an Illuminati message. Read up on these murderers.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Supah_Patriot
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 8:59am
Nothing was “debunked” here, only “defined.” There’s a difference between those terms. No one is claiming that a semi-auto is an auto, as she implied.

And what does being a great target shooter have to do with the debate about clip capacity? Nothing.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Rickfromillinois
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 9:22am
  You are wrong. Many believe that an AR-15 is a fully automatic weapon, and I have heard it referred to as a “machine gun”. When politicians and zealot gun grabbers use terms like “assault weapon” and “automatic” and “spraying bullets” they are either ignorant of what they are talking about, or as I believe, they are purposely trying to mislead the gullible. Because of this misleading propaganda there are indeed many people who think that it is now legal to own sub-machine guns and that they can easily be purchased by anyone at a gun show. By the way, if you have a special Federal license you can indeed own a fully automatic weapon as long as your state allow it. NONE of this specially licensed automatic weapons owners have as yet used one of them in the commission of a crime.
  
  Report this comment
SamIamTwo
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 8:54am
You clowns keep on showing which guns can do what they will come after my guns. Stop telling the left anything. LMAO

Besides do you really think they care about the truth? Seriously think they will change their cortex’s, eh? With the re-election of Obama they don’t listen, hear or speak the same language…and if you have a meaningful discussion with them they get all angry cause it is an attack on their belief system…just as bad as debating the Bible or disguising religion and politics. They are out to divide us and push us to the conservative states. I can’t afford to move and will hold my ground! LOL (moved to a hood that is one step left of true (*60′s) center in PNW-we have a slim chance in this hood)

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
woodyee
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 8:38am
With regards to this topic and similar posted on the Blaze, I JUST posted a question on the ‘universal’ poll site, URTAK, featured recently here and on this topic. My question –

“In light of recent (20thCentury) history, do you think it possible for the current administration in Washington, or a near-future administration, to get murderous with our people?”

Some might think it ridiculous to pose such a question ,but then again, there are simply TOO MANY BAD THINGS HAPPENING TODAY that we did not think possible within our current lifetimes (I’m talking the WITHIN the last 50 years!), though we’d been warned time & time again that to ignore history is to repeat it.

Well, we’re on our last warnings, folks…

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Supah_Patriot
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 8:55am
  We don’t need armed militias. You watch too much TV and listen to too much Beck. Your entertainment is violence based. It has rotted your brain. Go outside, be involved, and work within the system and you’ll find well being. This talk about being armed against tyranny stems from frightened people who feel they’ve lost control. What’s sad is that they fail to recognize the pattern that was set in motion over 200 years ago, and that leaders and power come and go. Don’t worry too much that we have a Democrat president. People who blow this so out of proportion do themselves no favors, they just come off as far right (or left) nutters.
  
  Report this comment
- Red Meat
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 8:56am
  Hannity? LOL
  
  Looks like Beck is politicking to get his gig back on FNC.
  
  Hannity is now remarkably for amnesty for illegals. Karl Rove is back…Dennis Cucinich has been signed.
  It’ll be one happy traitorous progressive family once again.
  
  Disgusting.
  
  Report this comment
- progressiveslayer
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 9:06am
  Is it possible,of course it is and with the messianic mentality of the current occupant of the oval office it’s a likely probability. He’s a collectivist and craves power and control and he also has a kill list. He’s used it overseas and I don’t think he’d have any problem using it here either.
  
  Report this comment
- RJJinGadsden
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 9:13am
  SUPAH_PATRIOT, Your statements here are just as stupid as what you say Capitalist Forum. You are just a Howler Monkey throwing your own feces to see if you can make any stick to something or to as you say, piss people off.
  
  Report this comment
- TIMEBOMB
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 9:23am
  SUPAH_PATRIOT It’s always good to see my zombies spreading disinformation and as your magnificent gay Marxist ruler I commend you comrade! I might even allow you to get on your knees and worship me the proper way,if you’re lucky I’ll allow you to kiss my ring. Of course you’ll have to be deloused before being allowed in my magnificent presence. Off you go my pawn continue your good works.
  
  Report this comment
- Rickfromillinois
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 9:32am
  Supuh patriot – The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the 2nd Amendment preserves U.S. Citizen’s right to defend themselves and to act as a check against Government Tyranny. Those who focus exclusively on the Militia portion are disregarding the Amendment as a whole, the writers intent, and are using it as a red herring. THEY say you are wrong.
  
  Report this comment
- Wolf
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 9:49am
  “…Supah_Patriot
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 8:55am
  We don’t need armed militias…”
  
  You don’t ‘need’ a car, either- but I’ll bet you have one.
  You don’t ‘need’ a cell phone, either- but I’ll bet you have one.
  You don’t ‘need’ a computer, either- but I’ll bet you have one.
  You don’t ‘need’ to run your mouth, either- but you do.
  
  This country has more ‘need’ of an armed militia than any country on the planet- all because of people like you and your demigod.
  
  Report this comment
- woodyee
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 9:54am
  @ Supah-Patriot, who said – “We don’t need armed militias. You watch too much TV and listen to too much Beck. Your entertainment is violence based. It has rotted your brain.”
  
  - in response to my post.
  
  1. In my post, I said nothing about armed militias.
  2. Knowing nothing about me, I assume that when you said “You watch too much TV and listen to too much Beck. Your entertainment is violence based. – that you were speaking generally, about EVERYONE who you have a political disagreement with.
  3. I just read your last 10 posts. Your response to mine is about the most intelligent of all – and I think I’ve said all that needs be said because everything else about you speaks for itself.
  
  Report this comment
- Cavallo
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:42am
  @Supah, I am going to assume you are merely woefully naïve, rather than a fascist advocate of the State. Many are like you, thinking that nothing bad could ever happen here. There is nothing genetically different from what the Chinese did in the 50s and 60s, no great evolutionary advancement in the ****-sapiens makeup that changes them from the Hutus in Rwanda. Human beings are a vile murderous species. To assume that your fellow man would not seek to enslave and murder you is as woefully ignorant as those that think they can go on smoking or having unprotected sex because disease is just something that happens to other people, it could never happen to them.
  
  Report this comment
- Supah_Patriot
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:56am
  Cavallo, you make yourself feel important by pretending that you’re going to stand up to the government some day. Enjoy your fantasy.
  
  Report this comment
- Cavallo
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 3:37pm
  I guess I was wrong, they are a fascist advocate of the State. Every time you give these statist Marxist sycophants the benefit of the doubt you will be disappointed. Cest la vie.
  
  Report this comment
cvs334
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 8:37am
Sorry, but this is on the first Hanity show … where did the FIRST 9mm round go … i stopped the vid many times and did not notice where it landed … did SHE MISS??

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- mmath969
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 9:29am
  I think she placed the shot next to the .223 shot, to show how much a bigger hole it would make.
  
  Report this comment
dublinthewagons
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 8:37am
It sure would be rough on a man ego to compete against her in a shooting match.
I have found “never underestimate a woman in a shooting match”

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
ares338
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 8:32am
Most people with half a brain also know these facts but I’m glad we are getting the positive exposure from someone. I don’t think they’ll have her on MSLSD.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Jake Dog2
  Posted on January 23, 2013 at 8:17pm
  The problem is most of the people don’t have half a brain. That is obvious by the last election.
  
  Report this comment
woodyee
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 8:30am
STOP lamenting what Obama ‘might’ do, or second-guessing the administration! Think OUTSIDE the box. We chew our nails out worrying about “what’s going to happen next” or trying to second-guess the administration. It’s a no-win attitude.

KNOW your history, and pass it along so that it is NOT repeated. You don’t need to know much, THANKS TO PRAVDA. You only need to disseminate what this author taught you – http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/28-12-2012/123335-americans_guns-0/#

-Pay particular attention to the 5th paragraph. Also, if you can, copy/capture/save the webpage, or select all of the ‘print’ version, and save it; I don’t place it beyond the realm of possibility that the page will “disappear.”

Pass it on to all your mail groups. TWIT it. Face-plant it. Pass it around your family, friends, hunters, fishers, students. Because PRAVDA TELLS US HOW THEY MAY ATTEMPT IT. It also tells us to be like bees.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
jungle J
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 8:29am
The enemy within doesn’t care. And their supporters are too high/medicated to care.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.