Developing: Bridge Collapses Near Seattle…Unknown Injuries…See the Photos
Watch Today’s BlazeCast With Your Questions, Comments & Live Chat!
Jake Tapper: Clinton’s ‘What Difference Does It Make?’ Remarks Will Come Back to Haunt Her in 2016
CNN’s newest anchor Jake Tapper thinks Hillary Clinton’s potential 2016 opponents already have some new material for attack ads.
In a heated moment during her Benghazi testimony on Wednesday, the secretary of state lost her cool and hollered her response following a series of questions posed by Republican Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin.
“With all due respect, the fact is we have four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they’d go kill some Americans,” Clinton shouted during the hearing. “What difference at this point does it make?”
CNN host Anderson Cooper on Wednesday night asked Tapper whether or not the hearing would have any impact on her future political career, especially if she decided to run for president in 2016.
“I think that the quote of hers that you just played, ‘What difference does it make at this point?’ is ready for a campaign commercial,” Tapper said.
“I think that will be used against her and certainly it comes across as more glib than I think — if she could go back and revise and extend those remarks she would have,” he added.
The footage could be used by a Republican opponent like Gov. Chris Christie or even by a Democrat like current Vice President Joe Biden, according to Tapper.
Watch the clip via CNN/Mediaite:
(H/T: Matt Wilstein, Mediaite)
In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.
















































































































Comments (98)
begreen
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:59amOJ did a much better job of lying.
Report this comment
DRSAVAGE24
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:13amGod help us if it’s Chris Christie running those ads against Hillary. The Republic is doomed if the RINOs have their way in 4 years and we nominate yet another Democrat who calls himself a Republican to run against Hillary or Biden.
Report this comment
OldSurfRat
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 6:59amIf the green dress does not fit you can not convicted!
Report this comment
biohazard23
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 8:19amAnd like OJ, Hill will never be held accountable.
Report this comment
SquidVetOhio
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 8:26am“The footage could be used by a Republican opponent like Gov. Chris Christie”
Just stop it. If anything “Slim” will be her running mate, not her opponent. He has NO prayer of winning the GOP nomination. Traitorous dog.
Report this comment
marybethelizabeth
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 8:44amAs Mr. Beck says, and all you posters “just know”, “Something” is wrong. You just don’t know what it is.
What is wrong is the privatization of the military.
If America has the best military in the world, then why are they contracting with private firms to provide security for it’s own military?
Report this comment
jettson
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 8:55ambiohazard23 OJ is in jail. If Hillary was there It would be good enough.
Report this comment
Kregneva
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 11:41amTalkin’ about LIAR TROLLS
((Walkabout, to JRook // January 23, 2013 /11:45am) “Fact driven? To those of us that have served in the military we find your accusation of political theatre (sic) absurd. You have very little knowledge of foreign affairs or the military. I don’t know the final outcome in Syria, but latest intel has Dear Leader doing very little.” ))
There IS a difference between “political” and “ideological” but you fail to read American correctly. Then, you imply that you served in “the Military” however you are not an American and you stated before you were not in any Aussie service. (Maybe you are a different writer/actor on the “Walkabout Team.” Or you are just bluffing about your military credentials.
Individual US military services assignments does not necessarily always indicate foreign affairs expertise. Every airman, chief petty officer or corporal does not possess “Mastery” of rifle marksmanship, hand-to-hand combat, sonar, radio, artillery, satellite transmission, motor mechanics, carrier decks, ordnance, special operations or foreign affairs. Some serve stateside all their careers, and focus on the physics of radar surveillance.
So, where did you serve, just say so we get your context please.
“Real” military service members and veterans never make the broad associations you always so glibly do, gainsay me that? Your lack of authenticity would embarrass all but the most brazen of paid provocateurs. You are t
Report this comment
Mulder1
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 4:12pmIt matters because Obama and Clinton told us that the Benghazi attack was caused by an anti-Muhammad video, which no one could blame them for. But, they do get the blame for not adequately protecting our people from an Islamic Jihadist attack.
Report this comment
johnsnare
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 5:49pmLiberals, choose to see and hear only what they choose to see and hear. It is usually another liberal quoting Saul Alinsky.
Report this comment
defeatobamasocialistagenda
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:02amIf someone where to slice her gay daughter’strhouth with a butterknife while that socialistpieceofshitz is pushing control of 2d admendment………’What Difference Would It Make’
Report this comment
BLACKDIAMONDSKIER
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:01amI disagree. If President Obama’s “you didn’t build that” comment didn’t affect the voters…. this comment certainly will not. She could have confessed that she had killed someone who tried to tell the truth about Bengazi, admitted she was a hermaphrodite, choked her dog to death, etc. and the uneducated electorate on the left would still vote for her.
Report this comment
blanco5
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 6:51amSadly, you are correct.
Report this comment
Lars Skipole
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 7:12amI agree with Blanco. After all the problems Obama has caused, he still got reelected. They will vote for ANYBODY.
Report this comment
marybethelizabeth
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 8:36amMitt Romney said he was qualified for President because he was the guy who stepped in and “built that” when other peoples efforts were failing.
The “you didn’t build that” comment didn’t hurt the President because what he said was true.
It was banal and obvious, but true.
Report this comment
naughtycal
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 9:11amIf you put a D in front of Charle Mansons name he would get at least 50% of the Democratic voting block. They’re not an informed voting block…they just sheep. You could put the D in front of a dog turd and still get the same results.
You’re right black the fact that this kareless kankled k*nt point blank said finding out why, and this happened doesn’t matter….won’t matter to the flock. And finding out why this Adminstration tried to hide the truth doesn’t won’t matter to their flock either.
Report this comment
scubadogs
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 11:54amI agree. If we had a media that was objective then this would play out but when you have a media that is bias and unconditionally supports the administration no matter what it does, these words will be blurred to the American public. The only words you will here is that the Republicans did not fund the security request, its their fault.
I am so sad and fearful as to what the United States has become.
Report this comment
Strait Talk Express
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:44pmWow I was made breathless when you told us there, “They’re not an informed voting block…they just sheep. this happened doesn’t matter….won’t matter to the flock.” This is SO true it scares off my pants, you know. And like us, I too am frustrated daily – you know, becuse that there is HOW THEY KEEP WINNING over us thinkers/patriots and such. They are flok-sheepers and you cannot beat them until we control who has the rights to even vote and all that. Then we certainly could outnumber them at last. Thats what I have to say and thats enough for today.
Report this comment
jaijacobia
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:12pmI hate it, but you’re right. Liberal Democrats are willingly blind, deaf and dumb. They simply do not hear, see or speak the truth.
Report this comment
Basharr
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:47pmIt is not the uneducated electorate, it is the willingly blind, they refuse to hold any of these idiots accountable. It started when Slick Willies impeachment was not carried out completely. The nation then did nothing to demand justice and from the point until present day the Liberal agenda moves forward mostly unchecked as they spread hate, spend us into oblivion and gnaw away like starved rats at our freedoms. They are perfectly educated not to care about rights, freedom or even human life…..
Report this comment
nzkiwi
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:13amTrue, the comment will be brought out to attack her, but Mr Obama overcame much worse to be elected President – twice.
Report this comment
Gonzo
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 8:37amYou’re right, there are a lot of lemmings in this country.
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:44pmYes it will come back to haunt her. Oddly enough, it will be brought up a Democrat running against her in a primary. Much like her campaign started the Birther issues in ’08. Afterwards, the media will smear the
Republicans for it in hopes to again wipe the slate clean.
Report this comment
sparkyrules
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:39pmJake Tapper isn’t gonna save CNN.His credibility is lessened by this association.IMO.
Report this comment
CarolinaGirl
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 8:23amI totally agree. Tapper must have been offered some huge bucks for this stint on CNN. NOBODY watches this cable station anymore.
Report this comment
TJexcite
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:37pmThe bumper stickers are already being made somewhere
Hillary 2016 What difference does it make at this point?
http://is.gd/Hillary2016
Report this comment
BODYBAG
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:58pmIve given this considerable thought and reached a concrete conclusion.
I read this story:
Ryan blames Republican election loss on poor communication, turnout
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/23/us-usa-politics-ryan-idUSBRE90M1IO20130123
More importantly I started reading the comments section at the bottom.
WARNING: It will make you angry.
Mostly young low-information type O voters brainwashed in their Messiah’s glow.
But a few conservatives jump in after awhile and those remarks were really revealing and
they were all similar —– I didnt vote because Romney/Ryan were not what I wanted.
It was then I realized —
If you’re conservative and you stayed home on election day you’re MORE STUPID than an Obama voter because you KNEW better.
There is NO SUCH THING AS NOT VOTING. A monkey could figure that out.
You can have all the stupid RINO arguments you want but it doesnt change the fact that right
NOW if Romney were President we would not be facing the prospect of massive gun confiscation and fiscal collapse. We could possibly be excited right now at having things done to set the economy on fire again.
Report this comment
hjablo
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:35amTeflon Hillary!.
Report this comment
betterpart
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:30amThe pendulous hag is only fit to serve tea to visiting dignitaries—her previous ‘work’ experience lol…
Report this comment
reality based lifeform
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 7:13amgood one!
Report this comment
AxelPhantom
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:31pmWhat difference does it make? Really?
She and the President trotted out there and lied knowing d@mn well that this was a terrorist attack and not about a video. They lied to the electorate, lied to foreign dignataries, lied to the press and most importantly lied to the parents of those who died!! —and it doesn’t matter? They have proven themselves to be unethical, untrustworthy and undeserving of their offices. But I guess that doesn’t matter right MS. Clinton?
Report this comment
nesmond
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:23pmThey could have Hillary on video leading the attack on the embassy and dragging Chris Stevens’ dead body through the streets of Benghazi and she would still win the 2016 election. As long as she follows in BHO’s footsteps, anything goes. Liberals got their first black President, now they want their first woman President. It’s all about symbolism with these nincompoops.
Report this comment
starview
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:45pmOh, Yeah. No funding…… http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/state-department-had-no-for-benghazi-security-here-is-what-it-did-have-for/
According to Hillary Clinton’s long-delayed Benghazigate testimony, the State Department just did not have enough money to provide security for a mission in one of the most dangerous places in the world.
It did however have 16 million dollars to spend on 2,500 kindle book readers at the drastically inflated price of $6,600 per device.
How much security could that 16 million buy?
It had $79,000 to spend on Obama’s books and $20,000 on a portrait of Obama. The US Embassy had $150,000 to spend on a book about the ambassador’s residence. The US Embassy in Austria had $150,000+ for a Chevy Volt and its charging station.
And here is what else Hillary’s State Department did have money for…
7.9 billion dollars for Obama’s Global Health Initiative.
1 billion for global climate change.
2.2 billion to strengthen democratic institutions in Pakistan.
And of course… Mosque renovations.
In 2011 the State Department provided funds to restore the 15th century Gobarau Minaret in Katsina State in Nigeria’s predominantly Muslim north, an area which has become a virtual killing field for Christians at the hands of Muslim militants, led by the al-Qaeda-linked terror group Boko Haram.
And $4.5 million for Art in Embassies
The New York Times reported in 2009 that Art in Embassies spends about $4.5 million a year for pe
Report this comment
CatB
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:29amDid you know that before she testified her campaign debt was paid in full ??… coincidence .. I think not!
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/22/clinton-retires-last-12m-debt-from-2008-campaign/
Report this comment
CatB
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:33amHere is a link for the liberal trolls …
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/22/hillary-clinton-campaign-debt_n_2530528.html
Report this comment
SamIamTwo
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:09pmThe bloody committee gave her a pass. She was not pushed on anything. Period…
She gave the GS12 typical response of, we have the audit of findings and we implemented corrective action for those findings so future occurrences will be mitigated. Old crap from the 80′s…impressive if you are not part of the farm. Not so if you are part of the farm. Seemed like weak sauce to me.
This so called process, the one outlined by Hillary, is more for the manufacturing of a bloody car…not for responding to a crisis and blaming security and funding…the latter is BS bureaucracy that can we walked around by those who can waive the requirements. Tired of this sheit. Oh let’s put together and Ishikawa diagram (cause and effect) first to give us a start, eh?
The federal government took on Deming TQM and began using it back in the late 80′s and into the future. They apply manufacturing improvement process steps for paperwork and to bureaucracy…when in fact they can waive requirements under an EMERGENCY…
The let her off the hook and these are suppose to be our best conservative Republicans. Prob afraid she would scold them. Typical conservative males. Screw this and that.
Report this comment
cassandra
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:57pmshe can’t run the State Dept right how could the left think she can run the country ! first off hillary why wern’t YOU on TV making statements right after the attack instead of Rice YOU were Amb.Stevens boss and if you didn’t have a clear picture of what hapened why did you tell the family it was because of a video ? what were you doing during the 5 hrs that amb. Stevens was missing ? you say you didn’t have real time video BS in the 5 hr Stevens was missing you had plenty of time to get a drone up there, and during the time Amb Stevens was missing why didn’t you send Marines in there to find him, this commitee let her off as usual only 1 thing was said right by Ran Paul she should have been relieved of duty but then again she couldn’t let BHO look bad just before the election,
Report this comment
Chuck Stein
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:56pmThey could use this (from Monty Python and the Holy Grail) as well: “Let’s not have any of this pointless bickering about who killed who!”
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:55pm” What Difference Does it Make” sounds like the perfect title for a classic. Where is the talent out there, fellow ” traditional ” Americans ?!
Report this comment
AbrahamsSheepdog
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:02pm*> €£ Rushbo, we got a new song to work on. Sidenote: It’s likens Lucifer’s children loose in the off white house. Yuck, blood on the hands of all the baboons.
Report this comment
AbrahamsSheepdog
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:21pmSee just pop Tibets-o-posts together. Funny stuff like witches, reptiles, STD’s from Billy. I used “I’ve fallen and can’t testify, LieAlert saved me” or if ever a movie, have Silvester Stallon star as Hillary. Ron Jermey as Bill.
Report this comment
AbrahamsSheepdog
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:54pmTy old buddy, cheer with the boys for us up there! Ain’t much, but you know how it goes. Hey Ty maybe you’ll get a heritage .45 ACP in your honor. You deserve a Desert Eagle buddy. God bless the USA.
Report this comment
neverending
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:53pmSorry Tapper – since when does any of the clinton’s past haunt them? They have no conscience and no shame – none of them – hillary, slick willie and yes chelsea!
Report this comment
RationalMan
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:16pmTime will tell!!!!
Report this comment
strawberry411a
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:41pmShe still is carrying the Rose Law firm file box that was “lost” years ago…..
Report this comment
Gonzo
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 8:43amI agree. Her hubby didn’t see any difference between truth and fiction either. He is now an icon of the left. This won’t hurt her because we have biased media with an agenda. People’s words are only used against them if they are conservative. Look at the hubub about “binders of women”.
Report this comment
Metallicat
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:53pm2016? She should have no future left in politics! Who files charges against these people on behalf of the American public? The American people are witnesses to the scam they tried to perpetrate on us and they walk away to concentrate on their future political aspirations? Thats insane!
Report this comment
IndyGuy
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:50pmIt’s about time a lot of Politicians started being haunted by their words… But yeah…These words should be the ruin of Hillary…
Report this comment
RationalMan
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:49pmIt sure sounds like “Foster” came out of his grave, to haunt you Hillary the witch on the broom!
Karma…….
Report this comment
toto
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:46pm“That woman” knew everything from the get go, she is lying, and has lied from the beginning. That the Republicans are not exposing what they know convinces me that the party is not salvageable.
Report this comment
ginjit.dw
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:43pmTrying to rewrite history again. She is incompetent and inept. The worst secretary of state ever. When your sons weren’t slaughtered then it’s what does it matter, plus those glasses are awful.
Report this comment
drs1969
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:35pmPart of her defense. You wouldn’t hit a girl, would’ya? You wouldn’t hit a girl with glasses, would’ya? She may have worn those in college, too.
I haven’t seen her so defensive since she made that Tammy Wynette comment. They were on the ropes then, too.
Report this comment
MDECKER
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:42pmThere is no statute of limitation on murder. Four months of rehearsal certatainly doesn’t cut it, Hill!
Report this comment
AbrahamsSheepdog
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:41pmNever fight mad. Her acting role slipping she shows her skeletor side. The massacre barbie face and darkside. Ha-ha witch!
Report this comment
starview
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:36pmAnd Rand Paul is the only one with ANY back bone.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jriU_cPU9Vk
Report this comment
UnknownUser1
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:58pmThe reasons that it matters mrs Clinton is because some very few of us care about the truth and because you are on trial!!!
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 8:29amUNKNOWN: No. It is because you are a clueless Democrat Troll and America is on trial because of that .
Report this comment
starview
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:36pmThat is exactly what I thought. In a way I am glad she did not answer the question, and lashed out instead, it will come back to bite her.
Report this comment
neverending
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:00pmI’d say Rand Paul is prety sharp!
Report this comment
starview
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:36pmAnd seems like he was the only one in that whole room that had the guts to tell her the truth.
Report this comment
drs1969
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 11:42pmPaul’s smarter than her and she knows it !
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on January 23, 2013 at 10:34pmSeem’s that’s how the left feel’s about every thing…http://weaselzippers.us/2013/01/23/lefty-rag-salon-so-what-if-abortion-ends-a-life/
Report this comment