Dems Reintroduce ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban (and List Shows It’s Not Just Rifles): ‘Purpose Is to Dry Up the Supply of These Weapons Over Time’
Vice President Joe Biden administers the Senate Oath to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. during a mock swearing in ceremony on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 3, 2013, as the 113th Congress officially began. Credit: AP
Congressional Democrats are reintroducing legislation to ban assault weapons but the measure faces long odds in the GOP-controlled House of Representatives.
The measure being unveiled Thursday is authored by Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, who wrote the original assault weapons ban. That law expired in 2004 when Congress refused to renew it. There’s much disagreement about the effectiveness of the original assault weapons ban.
“The purpose is to dry up the supply of these weapons over time,” Feinstein said on Capitol Hill Thursday, flanked by several “assault” weapons. “Therefore there is no sunset on this bill.”
Feinstein’s sweeping legislation includes a ban on weapons with any “one military characteristic,” and bans the “import, export, manufacture, sale and transfer of hundreds of semi-automatic rifles, handguns and some shotguns,” Townhall’s Katie Pavlich reports.
In other words, the ban doesn’t just cover the “scary” AR-15 and AK-47 semi-automatic rifles. Here’s the list of more than 150 guns that would be banned under Feinstein’s plan. Freelance journalist Jonathan Krohn told TheBlaze that the list was handed out at Thursday’s announcement on Capitol Hill, which he was covering. It looks even more sweeping on paper.
(Twitter)
Watch Feinstein’s Thursday announcement via the Washington Free Beacon:
The National Rifle Association promptly responded to Democrats’ proposed gun ban on Thursday and called on Congress to “reject” Sen. Feinstein’s bill. The NRA released the following statement:
Senator Feinstein has been trying to ban guns from law-abiding citizens for decades. It’s disappointing but not surprising that she is once again focused on curtailing the Constitution instead of prosecuting criminals or fixing our broken mental health system. The American people know gun bans do not work and we are confident Congress will reject Senator Feinstein’s wrong-headed approach.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) released his own statement in response to Feinstein’s gun ban proposal on Thursday afternoon:
Washington politicians shouldn’t be taking advantage of recent tragedy to try to push an aggressive gun control agenda. Real assault weapons—machine guns—are already functionally illegal, and they have been since 1934. This proposal would have done nothing to prevent the terrible murders in Newtown, but it would limit the constitutional liberties of law-abiding citizens. And gun control doesn’t work – the empirical data overwhelmingly demonstrate that strict gun-control laws consistently produce more crime and more murders.
The Second Amendment exists to ensure that law-abiding Americans can protect their homes and families, and I look forward to helping lead the fight to defeat this bill and to protect our constitutional right to keep and bear arms.
An assault weapons ban is among the measures supported by President Barack Obama, who unveiled a package of gun safety proposals last week. But because of concerns among moderate Democrats it’s seen as a heavy lift in Congress, with measures such as beefed-up background checks more likely to pass.
At the heart of the debate, President Barack Obama and Democrats are claiming that banning so-called “assault weapons” will make Americans more safe.
The truth is much more complicated. The use of handguns in gun-related homicides is roughly 70 to 80 percent in most states, 24/7 Wall St. notes. Meanwhile, the use of rifles is under 5 percent, and use of shotguns about 5 percent. Knives are nearly always used in more murders than rifles or shotguns, according to FBI data.
24/7 Wall St.’s Douglas A. McIntyre suggests the federal government should make more of an effort to gather data on gun violence from local authorities in order to take meaningful action.
“The problem that the lack of data causes is about how to determine which guns might or might not be regulated more carefully,” he writes.
The Associated Press contributed to this report. This story has been updated
In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.
Popular Stories
‘The Daily Show’ Creator Makes Outrageously Offensive Anti-Conservative Joke About Okla. Tornado 480 Comments
Why Were DHS Agents Seemingly Monitoring Multiple Tea Party IRS Protests Across the Country on Tuesday? 425 Comments
Confusion Erupts in IRS Hearing After Lois Lerner Tries to Plead the 5th — Watch It All Unfold 387 Comments
CNN’s Wolf Blitzer Has Awkward Moment With Okla. Tornado Survivor After Asking If She ‘Thanked the Lord’ 307 Comments
More Than $1 Million Raised Through Mercury One for Oklahoma Tornado Relief 266 Comments
Faith
-
Comedian’s New Anti-Muhammad Video Excoriates Islamic Prophet, Juxtaposes Him with Jesus: ‘Very Wrong and Twisted’
114 Comments
-
Teacher Admits She ‘Prayed Out Loud’ During Violent Tornado: ‘I Did the Teacher Thing that We’re Probably Not Supposed to Do’
113 Comments
-
Farrakhan Talks of ‘Satanic Jews’ and ‘Synagogue of Satan’ at Detroit Church Speech — but Wait Until You Hear Who Was in Attendance
216 Comments
-
Biden Praises Jewish Leaders for Helping Change Americans’ Views on Gay Marriage
Read More
-
‘Death! You F**k!’: Bat Mitzvah Chaperone Unleashes Explosive, Profanity-Laced Tirade Against Kids Over Candy-Throwing Incident
Read More
Business
-
Foreign Banks Operating on U.S. Soil Have Just Set a Record
Read More
- The Tense Exchange Between Rep. Trey Gowdy and the Former IRS Head You’ve Been Waiting for…and It Doesn’t Disappoint 203 Comments
- Report: No IRS Workers Have Been Disciplined & Union Says It Hasn’t Been Contacted on Personnel Read More
-
Ex-Cincinnati IRS Manager: This Was Not the Work of ‘Low-Level’ Employees
Read More
-
China Sets off What Could Be the World’s Longest Demolition
Read More
Technology
-
The Incredible Role Facebook Played in the Aftermath of Devastating Okla. Tornado
Read More
-
Tech Company Demonstrates Remote Disabling of a ‘Smart Gun’
114 Comments
-
Meet the Blind Man Nicknamed ‘Midnight Gunslinger’ Who Has 80% Shot Accuracy
Read More
-
How a $4.5 Million Network of 181 Sirens Helped Save Lives in Oklahoma Twister
Read More
-
See the Record-Setting Python a Man Caught With His Bare Hands (and Guess How Much It Weighed)
Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (482)
L.B.Stephens
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:58pmIf a person wants to purchase a certain item that the government bans or restricts, will the person find a way to get the item through any means possible? Will there be a “supplier” willing to break the law to provide the item?
Did the U.S. government ban the sale of liquor in the 1930′s? Is the world we live in, lawless?
Report this comment
SgtB
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 11:14pmLaws do not matter. Rights do matter. When the government passes a law that makes a commodity “illegal”; it cannot be anything but moral for a man to supply that commodity to willing patrons. Just like laws in 1940′s Germany that made it illegal to be a Jew did not matter and those who protected them from the law were moral.
Report this comment
Obama_In_PeePee_Is_Becks_Art
Posted on January 25, 2013 at 1:18am” ‘Purpose Is to Dry Up the Supply of These Weapons Over Time’ ”
The PURPOSE of guns is to ARM CITIZENS.
The PURPOSE of armed citizens is to KILL TYRANTS.
The PURPOSE of tyrants is to DISARM CITIZENS.
The PURPOSE of disarmed citizens is to ALLOW TYRANNY.
Any questions?
(Anyone who asks sporting, hunting, collecting, or home defense, receives an automatic “F”.)
Report this comment
Obama_In_PeePee_Is_Becks_Art
Posted on January 25, 2013 at 1:29amP.S.
Drinking lots of water. Military assault PeePee is cocked & loaded!
Report this comment
NoSleeper
Posted on January 25, 2013 at 4:47amFirst and foremost, it is about individual rights. These various laws and regulations are nothing more than an infringement on those rights, limiting one’s ability to exercise those rights. We have a duty, as citizens, to fight for our rights and not let the Government take them away. The Second Amendment is the keystone in this struggle since it gives the citizens the means to resist a tyrannical and oppressive government, should it come to that…the ultimate check and balance. If it falls, the rest will not survive.
Laws that restrict goods that the people want serve only to develop a thriving criminal network: Prohibition brought about significant growth in organized crime, the war on drugs allowed for the expansion of violent inner city gangs, etc. When the Government reduces the supply but the demand remains, prices go up to the point where it is worth the risk to break the law to provide the goods.
In the case of guns, laws and regulations only affect the legal gun owners and will serve to slowly disarm the populace over time. Criminals will still be able to get illegal guns, but at a higher cost which will, by necessity, be funded by increased criminal activity.
Keep your liberty; keep your guns.
Report this comment
RedHarley
Posted on January 25, 2013 at 7:28am@Keaton says “Oh come on i used google search.. I had no idea the website was aimed at neo-nazis and white supremacists”
Apparently Keaton believes they can’t put anything on the internet that isn’t true.
His new boyfriend is a French model…………..bonjour
Report this comment
battles
Posted on January 25, 2013 at 10:15amI used to be a supervisor in the trucking industry and from time to time I had to transfer trucks myself for the truck rental companies. I got stopped in a DOT inspection station and upon presenting my driver’s license, I also present my concealed carry license as is required in my state when you are carrying. The Texas Department of Public Safety officer examining my truck expressed great satisfaction in seeing that I had a CHL. He said that the crime rate in Texas had gone down 35% since the CHL was implemented and that we CHL holders were making it safer for law officers.
Every CHL citizen was another possible backup to him, should he get into a problem with the bad guys. In CHL class we are warned that our gun should be used only for our own and family protection because you never know exactly what is happening in any given situation. But if someone is on top of a cop wrestling for his gun or repeatedly stabbing someone on the ground, then one knows without a doubt what is going on.
Report this comment
Publius
Posted on January 25, 2013 at 10:33amDo people still distill Moonshine?
Report this comment
naughtycal
Posted on January 25, 2013 at 3:09pmFRANKENSTIEN SAID”Purpose Is to Dry Up the Supply of These Weapons Over Time’
Isn’t that the purpose of everything liberal progressive policies ever proposed or enacted. To dry up the personal liberty of whatever they are trying to get their foot in the door on. Americans know how you work and we will do whatever it takes to keep your foot out the door.
Report this comment
girlnurse
Posted on January 25, 2013 at 3:49pmYeah our laws say it’s perfectly fine to kill babies–but God says its not.
” We must obey God rather than men” Acts 5:29
Report this comment
Trigus
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 12:34amIs it me or does it seem the Democrats are trying to stop African Americans from defending themselves.
Report this comment
sillyfreshness
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 4:07amHere Glenn,
This might explain your “conspiracy” episode and why there are doubters of the MSM out there:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgaBw9txktY
Report this comment
beardedjesse
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:57pmMOLON LABE time.
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:19pmYep even the police say so…http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISATXfAUxjc
Report this comment
momrules
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:25pmCivilwarcometh……….thank you for the Salon.com article you posted yesterday regarding abortion. It was heartbreaking to read what that woman wrote but I think that is what most people who champion abortion really believe.
Report this comment
The_Cabrito_Goat
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:33pm“over time” is the key phrase here. Do nothing in one fel swoop: do it incrementally.
This is the heart of progressivism, evolution over revolution.
Start out small, then build from there. The acorn effect. One day it will be a mighty oak.
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:36pmMOMRULES: Your Welcome. Genocide of our children should not be a choice. Sad state our country has fallen to…
Report this comment
Unix
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:44pmI am horrified too, and the blatant unconstitutional laws being passed recently…Patriot Act, NDAA, ObamaCare and now this, which BTW is the last straw! I see no sunset on TYRANNY from these Marxist wannabes. and if this bill passes millions of law abiding Americans will become criminals! If I am a criminal, what is left to lose…come and take ‘em Marxists, if you have the B@lls to do it! The line in the sand is drawn for all to see, and if they cross that line with more unconstitutional laws then let the blood that will spill be on their hands. Molon Labe, I will not comply with any of this garbage!
Report this comment
fastfacts
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:46pmHere is an MRC video reporting this is illegal: http://www.thedailycandidate.com/video/2013/jan/feinstein_gun_law.html
Report this comment
naughtycal
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:52pmJust wrote both my Democratic senators a nice e-mail about their oath of office and nazi feinstiens bill.
Report this comment
carhouse
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:55pmAR’s may not shoot down planes but they can shoot down drones,… just sayin maybe thats why they want the guns. criminal jackson would know or his criminal son
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:56pmFrom the mouth of a KGB agent…http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Iz3VjoHXLA
Report this comment
Cavallo
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:57pmAn NRA boycott scrubs one the nations largest sportsman shows.
Hoplophic jerkwads tried to take on the NRA and lost out big!
http://washingtonexaminer.com/nra-boycott-kills-outdoors-show-that-banned-assault-weapons/article/2519579#.UQFiKr_AexV
Report this comment
m14guy
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:04pmIf you have not already…join the NRA and Oath Keepers.
Report this comment
encinom
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:05pmThe conspiracy theorist and the gun nuts are just showing flying the crazy flag and proving why they can’t have these toys.
Techcon
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:14pmOsama—that’s right OSAMA—is a BIG 2nd Amendment supporter, that’s why he supports the SAMLAR (Semi-auto Military Look-a-Like Rifle) ban and limits on magazine capacity.
He’s also a BIG abortion supporter, that’s why he supports a ban on ASSAULT abortions (those OTHER than rape, incest, or life of the mother) and a limit on abortions to ten per year.
Oh, wait…
Report this comment
Eric Cart Man
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:16pmI want to hear more details on how this makes people safer and increases jobs? To me this does the exact opposite of what this country needs in both cases.
I am voting out everyone in my district that votes for this, at every level!
Report this comment
Techcon
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:16pm@ENCINOM-AN
You’re too WEAK to be an AMERICAN.
Get your STUPID a$$ to N. Korea, already.
Report this comment
rangerskippy
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:20pmJust wondering, but did these same dems happen to mention anything about 74% of all murders in the US being tied to gangs? The logical person would think they may have mentioned something about going after gangs. If they did mention, I must have missed it.
Did the dems happen to bring up the fact that in America, black Americans make up 12.5% of the population, and that they are currently doing 1/2 of all murders?
Did the also talk about the fact that half of all murder victims in the US were also black?
I would say that there might just be a statistical significance to those numbers, especially when you consider that if we lower black murder rates to the same as whites, we will drop the national murder per capita rate by almost 40%, and save a whole lot of black lives. I want to save black lives; do you think the dems do too?
Crime is not genetic, and skin color is benign and non-behavioral. Race does not cause crime, but we do know that the democrat’s welfare programs are intrinsically tied to our violent crime. I wonder if dems are staying hush hush about black crime, because they do not want to lose votes, and want to continue the facade that they are a friend to black, when in reality, the dem has a 150+ year history of racism toward blacks?
Did dems happen to mention that our cities with the highest amount of gun control (like Chicago) also have the most murders?
Did they say anything about rifles being used in less than 3% of all murders nationa
Report this comment
Keatonc333
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:23pmnaughtycal.. Hitler and the Nazi’s didn’t ban guns. The actually made it easier to keep and bear arms for their citizens. http://www.natvan.com/national-vanguard/assorted/gunhitler.html
Report this comment
OhioRifleman
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:23pm@ Encinom
It does not fit the definition of a conspiracy if it is out in public forum.
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:25pmI know what ENCIN. Is now LOL. Now look at what obama is. http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/01/24/Van-Jones-Obama-is-an-unabashed-Communitarian
Report this comment
Fubared
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:40pmKeaton if you link hands with Encidiot and all of it’s personalities, you could probably get that class action suit going against your community college professors. Don’t wait until you are completely stupid and ignorant. Show some personal responsibility and sue the crap out of them. It cannot all be your fault you have no idea of what you are speaking on.
Report this comment
OhioRifleman
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:54pm@ FUBAR
I would love to see Encidumbarse in the wild, mainly for the comedic gold that his multiple personality disorder surely should be. The confusion of going from a female to a male personality, regardless of hardware change, must be something that haunts him on a weekly basis. Or going from a nonaggressive spineless bottom-feeder to something in the passive-aggressive range and scaring the hell out of his relatives…Oh, the possibilities! If someone were to make a show of it, certainly they would hire in Charlie Sheen to play the star role, I would daresay.
Report this comment
cmsdrizzt
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:57pmKeatoncc-whatever, you actually make our argument for us supporters of the Constitution if only you knew your history! – Yes your article is somewhat correct. But the guns were taken from one segment of the population and then that segment was rounded up and exterminated. Now lets see what is happening today by the Progressives. Like Hitler they are targeting what they Hate and are going about to exterminate it. Black Americans account for 50+ percent of the gun murders and only 12% of the population. If you want to stop the crime then take the guns away from all the blacks. Or be honest and admit this isn’t about guns, It is 100% about undermining the Constitution and the United States in order to create your ******** utopia
Report this comment
GhostOfJefferson
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:58pmUPI posted this story. I posted a rebuttal on the comments section. Check it out, chime in if you agree.
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2013/01/24/Gun-ban-said-to-include-handguns-shotguns/UPI-86811359012600/?spt=hs&or=tn
Report this comment
Keatonc333
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:59pmtechcon.. I’m pretty sure it takes more strength to live under N. korean law than American law.
Report this comment
@leftfighter
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:04pmRead this report: http://www.nraila.org/legislation/federal-legislation/2012/feinstein-goes-for-broke-with-new-gun-ban-bill.aspx
First paragraph (capitalized for emphasis, mine)
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.)—author of the federal “assault weapon” and “large” ammunition magazine ban of 1994-2004—has announced that on the first day of the new Congress—January 3rd— she will introduce a bill to which her 1994 ban will pale by comparison. On Dec. 17th, Feinstein said, “I have been working with my staff for over a year on this legislation” and “It will be carefully focused.” INDICATING THE DEPTH OF HER RESEARCH ON THE ISSUE, SHE SAID ON DEC. 21ST THAT SHE HAD PERSONALLY LOOKED AT PICTURES OF GUNS IN 1993, AND AGAIN IN 2012.
This hoplophobe probably wet herself when she did… but it further goes to show the arrogance and absolute lack of common sense that’s going on in Washington. The mere act of looking at a picture of gun twice in 20 years helps you to determine whether they should be banned?
Big Scary Gun Ban, indeed…
Report this comment
rangerskippy
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:10pm@Keaton
Your comment “Hitler and the Nazi’s didn’t ban guns”
Are you smoking crack? Do you really think you are going to win point on this argument?
Regulations Against Jews’ Possession of Weapons
11 November 1938
With a basis in §31 of the Weapons Law of 18 March 1938 (Reichsgesetzblatt I, p.265), Article III of the Law on the Reunification of Austria with Germany of 13 March 1938 (Reichsgesetzblatt I, p. 237), and §9 of the Führer and Chancellor’s decree on the administration of the Sudeten-German districts of 1 October 1938 (Reichsgesetzblatt I, p 1331) are the following ordered:
§1
Jews (§5 of the First Regulations of the German Citizenship Law of 14 November 1935, Reichsgesetzblatt I, p. 1333) are prohibited from acquiring, possessing, and carrying firearms and ammunition, as well as truncheons or stabbing weapons. Those now possessing weapons and ammunition are at once to turn them over to the local police authority.
§2
Firearms and ammunition found in a Jew’s possession will be forfeited to the government without compensation.
§3
The Minister of the Interior may make exceptions to the Prohibition in §1 for Jews who are foreign nationals. He can entrust other authorities with this power.
§4
Whoever willfully or negligently violates the provisions of §1 will be punished with imprisonment and a fine. In especially severe cases of deliberate violations, the punishment is imprisonment in a penitentiary for up to five
Report this comment
Fubared
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:10pmLil Keatie
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_Germany
Read into it what you want, politics being what they are and timing with the prior treaty of Versailles. Why do lil lefty trolls always know better what was in Hitler’s heart than what is in our Constitution? Again, get with Encidiot, Monicene, Meat Eeyors, WangDang/SupahDupah, and get that class action suit going cuz you been had. It didn’t take. Your dog won’t hunt. Arn’t vs aren’t should be an indicator. Look it up, wiki is for all after all.
Report this comment
rangerskippy
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:11pmKeaton
Hey Moron! Hitler disarmed Jews, then he killed six million of them.
You got anything else stupid to say?
http://constitutionalistnc.tripod.com/hitler-leftist/id14.html
Report this comment
Keatonc333
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:12pmCmsdrizzt “Black Americans account for 50+ percent of the gun murders and only 12% of the population.” true. and I have been saying for far too long that we must arm every african american to fix this problem! Also how can anyone be anti utopia? and finally read the whole link.. but honestly i don’t blame you.. its pretty long so heres the quote. “The German Weapons Law of March 18, 1938, specifically excluded Jews from manufacturing or dealing in firearms or munitions, but it did not exclude them from owning or bearing personal firearms.” BOOM!
Report this comment
rangerskippy
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:12pmKeaton
What is next? You going to tell us that Stalin and Mao did not disarm their citizens or murder millions of them?
You are a first class asshat
Report this comment
tonypro
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:17pmThis is an overload tactic.
You know like they do with gas prices. Sticker shock everyone with a $.50 increase, then drop it down to a $.25 increase so you feel like they lowered the price.
So we will create a massive gun list to ban, and then will compromise on half of them so you think you’re getting a deal.
Fact is…..Treason is Treason any way you look at it.
Report this comment
mac410
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:19pmVery hard to read list but I don’t see the M-1 Garand and the M-14 on the list. I guess they were never used to assault anything.
Report this comment
rangerskippy
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:19pmJews (§5 of the First Regulations of the German Citizenship Law of 14 November 1935, Reichsgesetzblatt I, p. 1333) are prohibited from acquiring, possessing, and carrying firearms and ammunition, as well as truncheons or stabbing weapons. Those now possessing weapons and ammunition are at once to turn them over to the local police authority
Report this comment
RedHarley
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:21pmKeaton33 linking to and quoting a post from natvan.com, a white power, skinhead, Nazi website.
And………
Diane Feinstein brings a liberal preacher from the National Cathedral in to showcase the “cross lobby” and to showcase the how the left believes in the COMBINATION of church and state.
Bizarro World, indeed……….
Report this comment
naughtycal
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:23pmFeistien nazi bill doesn’t have Constitutional grounds and as actuall a call for a n article 5 convention.
Check out article 5
http://article5.org/
If Congress wants to over ride Constitutional law they can’t unless good people do nothing.
Report this comment
OhioRifleman
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:24pm@ Ghost Of Jefferson
What is that address of your personal website / forum? I went to it once weeks ago, but forgot to bookmark it.
Also, I read your UPI rebuttal and loved it.
Report this comment
Cavallo
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:24pmKeaton’s point is that the NAZIS were more freedom loving than the DNC and their assorted fascist supporters. He points out correctly that not even NAZI Germany would go as far as the leftist fascists in Washington.
Report this comment
BADDOGGYDESCIPLE
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:26pmAt Keaton, me thinks you are mistaken. Please note “Law on firearms and ammuntion, April 12th 1928″ Germany. Additionally, “Weapons Law” , March 18, 1928.
Also Soviet penal code article 128 of 1929. Articles 186 & 7, 1935, China.
Turkey article 166, penal code, 1866
Guatamala, 1964, decree 183
Uganda 1955 firearms ordinance
Cambodia, 1956, articles 322-328
All total, 55,000,000 (at least) dead from resulting democide/genocide following almost immediately in every instance. Source Guns and Ammo, March, 1994. Also available from the book “Lethal Laws”.
Report this comment
Fubared
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:29pmLil Keatie I know of some really decent land sharks if you want to get that class action going before you are completely lobotomized by your “instructors”. Encidiot is beyond salvation on so many levels, but your need for lower case letters and lower class diction could actually be brought out of the gutter yet. You should stalk Skippy for a while, that could better your “edumacation” quick.
Report this comment
GhostOfJefferson
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:40pm@OhioRifleman
No worries. :)
http://www.patriotsdonotcomply.com
and the Discussion area can be gotten to by either the navigation at the top of the page, or go to here.
http://www.patriotsdonotcomply.com/forum
Slainte!
Report this comment
The_Cabrito_Goat
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:40pmA response, Keaton? Hello? Is this thing on?
Report this comment
redfish52
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:47pmHere’s my question: Is the Federal Government going to release all the rapists, robbers, murderers, drug smugglers etc. from prison to house those of us that do not comply with their illegal new gun legislation or will they just build more prisons? Just asking?
Report this comment
SUNTZU
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:48pmThey have lost their fracking minds
Report this comment
Fubared
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:49pmGhost
That UPI comment was on the money-needs to circulate at other venues. Well said, speaks for millions of us, literally.
Lil Keatie
Why did Empress Fienstein need special permission when you cannot receive it? Aside from your idolatry and idiocy, you cannot do what she can, yet you comment on how dapper she is while being nekkid. Shame on you for your willful ignorance. You will have to pay for your eventual education, just probably not in the folk’s greenbacks.
http://mrctv.org/videos/feinsteins-gun-display-breaks-dcs-gun-laws
Report this comment
Keatonc333
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:56pmI was mistaken. bad link i guess. Hitler did get rid of most rights for jews, including guns, It wasn’t a nation wide thing. it was more incentive for jews to move and leave germany. But Look you guys saying that disarming jews lead to the holocaust is ridiculous! First off the holocaust started before any gun ban on jews was passed. it was more a formality more than anything and confiscation normally happened after they were on their way to the concentration camps.
Report this comment
OhioRifleman
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:58pm@ Red Fish 2
The FEMA Concentration Camps are built expressly for this sort of thing. They won’t need more prisons, just need to activate those camps, induct staff, then start trucking in the prisoners.
Report this comment
GhostOfJefferson
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:58pm@Cabrito
Keaton probably had to pause to head down to the local neo-nazi shrine to give the mandatory 5 times a day sieg heil salute.
It is no end of fun that somebody sourced him and found he uses skinhead/neo-nazi sites for information. lol
Report this comment
KMM
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 4:00pm@ERIC CART MAN – exactly… many reps no longer care what we think. They only care as much as it takes to get re-elected. They’re trying to make our votes irrelevant and turn us into peasants. All the more reason we need to vote every last elitist out (in any party) in 2014 before we can’t anymore.
Report this comment
000degrees
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 4:02pmIf she can get cops to stand next to her for the photo op you can bet she can get them to come (try to ) take them from you…..
Report this comment
Keatonc333
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 4:07pmOh come on i used google search.. I had no idea the website was aimed at neo-nazis and white supremacists.
Report this comment
Bluebonnet
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 4:16pmJust never call her Ma’am (as she told the General). Want to know what I call that witch?
Report this comment
THX-1138
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 4:22pm@Keatonc333
So, you thought since it was on the internet it must be true?
Ah, now I understand…
Report this comment
AZRACISTBIGOT
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 4:39pmDoes my tax money actually compensate this burned out liberal hack to dream up this type of unconstitutional Horse***t ? She can’t really be that delusional to believe she can get this bill through congress.
I have a better Idea. Any time an elected official wastes the taxpayers money on whipping a dead horse such as this, Fine them the amount of money they wasted and put that money towards reducing the national debt.
Report this comment
captjack1978
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 4:39pmI agree let them bring it if they have the guts, I will never give up!!!!!
Report this comment
Bluebonnet
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 4:41pmTruth is, she got the job being the witch in the broom factory on that annoying commercial. I knew it was that Feinstein gal the minute I saw it, and you notice I’d never call her Ma’am.
Report this comment
Mulder1
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 4:41pmThe Sandy Hook shooter did not use an assault-like rifle. He used 4 handguns.
Report this comment
RabidPatriot
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 4:54pm@Keaton
Where you should be concerned is that the message that you wished to convey and found literature backing your argument, was from a card carrying hate group of the highest order. I know that they use false propaganda to forward their ridiculous ideas and without knowing it you both have the same ideas. You may not have known that they were a Neo-Nazi group, but I’m sure they will be thrilled to hear that you are fighting for their cause pro bono.
Report this comment
Hermit-The-Crab
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 4:56pm@KEATONC333
I don’t know if you were aware of this, but the site you linked to is run by the “National Vanguard” which is an anti-Semitic, white supremacist, National Socialist (Nazi) organization.
So, not exactly an impartial voice on the subject.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Vanguard_%28American_organization%29
Report this comment
OldBloodanGuts
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 4:57pmThey even go after the .22LR rifles.Crazy….
Report this comment
Techcon
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 5:00pm@CATATONIC666
“techcon.. I’m pretty sure it takes more strength to live under N. korean law than American law.”
Pretty sure?
Why don’t you MOVE there–instead of bringing that despotic crap here–and find out for SURE?
Or are you too WEAK to test out that theory? I’m sure we could take up a collection for your TICKET.
Report this comment
MittensKittens
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 5:05pmTHE_CABRITO_GOAT
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:33pm
“over time” is the key phrase here. Do nothing in one fel swoop: do it incrementally.
This is the heart of progressivism, evolution over revolution.
Start out small, then build from there. The acorn effect. One day it will be a mighty oak.
AND THERE IS ALWAYS A CHAINSAW THAT CAN CUT DOWN THE OAK TREE!
Report this comment
lillymckim
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 5:08pmWho in the hell does this idiot think she is and who in the hell are the people standing behind her pretending to be police officers?
Report this comment
lillymckim
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 5:11pmSen. Feinstein our constitution is not up for your personal” interpretation”
Report this comment
lillymckim
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 5:14pmWhere are the Republicans on this ban?
Could it be they have already caved on the Feinstein Gun Ban Bill?
Report this comment
lillymckim
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 5:16pmWho in the hell is this women to allow us anything? Who in the hell does she think she is?
Report this comment
RANGER1965
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 5:22pmI’m on the list 8 times.
Come and get em’ sweetie.
Report this comment
@leftfighter
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 5:28pm@encinom
Uhhhhh, aren’t you the same douche that less than a year ago was saying we were all craaaaazy conspiracy theorists for saying this was coming?
Haven’t you discredited yourself enough by now?
Report this comment
rangerskippy
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 5:30pm“Military-style assault weapons have but one purpose, and in my view that’s a military purpose, to hold at the hip, possibly, to spray fire to be able to kill large numbers.” ~ Sen Diane Feinstein
I liked to had a spell when I heard her make that quote, while I was driving down the road. Really? So, in 26 years of being in the military, I have been doing it wrong all along. I thought we held them at the shoulder, placed our cheek down on the stock, looked through the rear site, placed the front sight on the target, and pulled the trigger? I must have missed the marksmanship class where we hold them at the hip, and “spray” fire.
How can a lawyer who never served a day in the military, get up, make such stupid and asinine comments?
I think she watched to many freaking Rambo movies.
Report this comment
@leftfighter
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 5:34pm@Keatonc333
Maybe we’ve learned to do your own homework and not blindly believe the BS spouted? I know I’d have looked around the site a while first.
Seig heil!
Report this comment
kaydeebeau
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 5:36pmHmmm – since there are specific named weapons listed – it could be a very lucrative business to come up with a re-branding conversion kit. Also, won’t the manufaturers just need to come up with new names for their products to get around the intended ban – If I manufacture an AR 15 and the AR 15 is now banned can’t I just make the same gun and call it a STFU 15 – no longer on the banned list is it? ;)
Report this comment
Lord_Frostwind
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 5:40pmLet it be our rally cry,
MOLON LABE!
Report this comment
Silvertruth
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 5:44pmGhostofJefferson-
I read your post but it’s fear based, and I am not fond of fear based responses or ones that generate it. It doesn’t matter how ‘true’ it is, but it is fear based. Fear is a divider, a ‘fight or flight’ generator. We must be better than this or what are we actually fighting for in the end, old words that only a few people actually care about any more, or our pride? I think this is the wrong path.
We must find common ground with these people, govern to the common ground. Feinstein ‘means well’ in the echo chamber that is her office, but it’s wrong and at some level she has to know it (like you said in your comments). That means we have room to change their minds.
We cannot say “No!” to this without having a realistic plan to point to in ‘common ground’ opposition. Otherwise we just look obstructionist and not trying to resolve anything.
So, let’s come together on common ground. We can all say “There is too much violence in society” and we can all say “Let’s lower violence”. Nobody will disagree with that. Let’s propose laws or executive orders that discover where we are melting down into violent idiots that are so lost in ourselves that we cannot even see others as people. THAT is where to start, not trying to solve symptoms… Gun laws are laws in search of symptoms to solve.
Common ground people- FIND IT!
Report this comment
Keatonc333
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 5:48pmTechcon! yes please take up a collection for my ticket. and once you’ve gained a few thousand dollars let me know and i’ll tell you where to send it! Thanks!
Report this comment
Keatonc333
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 5:55pmThis is a thread i’d just as soon forget.
Report this comment
rangerskippy
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 6:01pmKeatonc333
Instead of forgetting this thread, perhaps you should learn a lesson from it.
Report this comment
The_Cabrito_Goat
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 6:18pmOK I’ll cut Keatie some slack, that was rather funny
Report this comment
Eternal
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 7:05pmHope she gets hit by a bus
Report this comment
Keatonc333
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 7:17pmoh come on… I make one incorrect statement while citing a neo-nazi website and you want me to be hit by a bus. : )
related note.. Thanks Ranger!
Report this comment
Plan B
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 7:20pmGhost,
Nice rebuttal. I hope it doesn’t come to this……..
Report this comment
El Pistoffo
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 7:25pmEncinom and KEATONC333 are just insects. Pay them no attention.
Report this comment
DADDYWOREAWHITEHAT
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 7:26pmIn TX we say come & take it. It means something to us in the English version. But when texans were defying Santa Anna it was as Americans & I think come & take it is for all of us patriotic Americans. You should see the looks I get flying the come & take it flag off the back of my golf car!
Report this comment
Marine 1
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 7:39pmOkay, folks, we’re only going to say his once…
You idiots back there is Washington, D.C. playing games with our freedoms and rights –
We are not going to comply and our Sheriff’s are backing us up in my state.
Semper Fidelis
Report this comment
DarkJello
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 7:43pmViolent criminals will now, finally, for the first time in history, stop hurting others because of these new laws. Bravo! Well done “centralized” government. If only you had even more of our money so that you could make the world safe and fair and just super duper neat for everyone! I am so happy.
I would LMBO, except history will repeat itself yet again. Sad panda.
Report this comment
Keatonc333
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 7:44pmone more correction… i meant to thank cabrito goat. Thanks cabrito goat!
Report this comment
rangerskippy
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 7:45pmhttp://www.policymic.com/articles/24103/joe-biden-responding-to-assault-weapons-ban-critic-a-shotgun-will-keep-you-just-as-safe
Uncle Shotgun Joey Bidden explaing whey the double barrel should be the weapon of choice.
Keep him and Feinstein away from the troops. Next think you know, we will all be armed with double barrels, and be shooting them from the hip.
Who the heck elected these morons?
Report this comment
BIG_G
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 8:13pm000degrees
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 4:02pm
If she can get cops to stand next to her for the photo op you can bet she can get them to come (try to ) take them from you…..
+++++++++++++
Yea, and a sad sack looking bunch of officers they are. This old insider trading goat is out of her mind.
Obama & Holder planning to kill americans on US soil. BRING IT!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YGAUU3umCA
Report this comment
Jarhead 88
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 8:22pmThe mere fact that she is even trying to do this ought to be enough. This action she is taking goes against her oath. She should be arrested but these republicans are not going to do it, they are a bunch of scared cowards.
Report this comment
WreakAlotOfHavoc
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 8:58pmIf a person has EVER, present or past, taken a prescription drug that can be related to depression, anxiety, attention deficit disorder, or ANY other drug related to brain function, you can be found mentally ill by ObamaCARE’s “committee of 15,” or the “Secretary,” or “Death Panel.” Take your pick.
Yep, just keep following like ‘sheeple.’ This is in the “Affordable Health Care Act,” to have all medical records be input into a database, (looks like “CONGRESS” isn’t the only one’s who did not read the bill.)
WHY? You might ask, well, when you go for a background check, you not only get your criminal record checked from your State Bureau of Investigation, and Federal Bureau of Investigation, and local court on record, NOW you now will have the “committee of 15” look into your electronic medical records. So, now you will have a long wait, just to be denied by the “15,” who, by the way, have NO medical training whatsoever!
The “15” will only be looking for red flag words, or the condition ”depression or angry,” or drug names like “Prozac, Adderall, Focalin, or Ritalin.” Get the picture yet? Yea, you are the mentally ill (or just asleep, or just STUIPID.)
IT IS ALL CONNECTED!
So, go ahead, give just a little, and what you don’t give, “they” will take. What “they” don’t take, “they” will get one way or another. “They” will invent ways to make a person “FIT” into a category that will sui
Report this comment
Ballot_Box_Revolution
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:30pm“HOW CAN ANYONE BE ANTI-UTOPIA?”
One can not have freedom in a utopia. The only way to even attempt a utopia is to rid the earth….or country of anyone who has ideas that differ from the power group that is in charge of implementing this “Untoipa”
This is still not a full proof plan to get the Utopia off the ground. To really get it going you must kill everyone on earth (The one powerful man/woman with the ideas will remain)….everyone except for a few children (I mean one powerful person will have to do the raising and teaching. Cant handle too many) raise those children only exposed to the ideas you want this Utopia to live under, and go from there…
That is the only full proof way…
This is why someone would be anti-utopian
ONE MAN’S UTOPIA, IS ANOTHER MAN’S HELL!!!!!
Report this comment
michaelmoron
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:31pmHow can REAL MEN sit back and let the Bankster’s minions do this to America and Americans.
You let them take our 4th Amendment with the Patiriot Act.
This is why they are going after the 2nd Amendment. Seems like people are giving in to that, also.
They took amendments 5 through 10 with NDAA, and we let them.
After the 2nd Amendment is gone, next comes free speech.
Maybe they will let us keep our third amendment. You know, No soldier can take over your house during “war”time without consent, unless otherwise prescibed by law.
Maybe you will fight tooth and nail for that one…… Nah.
Report this comment
WreakAlotOfHavoc
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:33pmIf a person has EVER, present or past, taken a prescription drug that can be related to depression, anxiety, attention deficit disorder, or ANY other drug related to brain function, you can be found mentally ill by ObamaCARE’s “committee of 15,” or the “Secretary,” or “Death Panel.” Take your pick.
WHY? You might ask, well, when you go for a background check, you not only get your criminal record checked from your State Bureau of Investigation, and Federal Bureau of Investigation, and local court on record, NOW you now will have the “committee of 15” look into your electronic medical records. So, now you will have a long wait, just to be denied by the “15,” who, by the way, have NO medical training whatsoever!
The “15” will only be looking for red flag words, or the condition ”depression or angry,” or drug names like “Prozac, Adderall, Focalin, or Ritalin.” Get the picture yet? Yea, you are the mentally ill (or just asleep, or just STUIPID.)
IT IS ALL CONNECTED!!!
So, go ahead, give just a little, and what you don’t give, “they” will take. What “they” don’t take, “they” will get one way or another. “They” will invent ways to make a person “FIT” into a category that will suit “their” needs. When you wonder how or why, it’s too late, you are no longer a ‘citizen’, you are a ‘subject’ enslaved by your own foolishness! Subjected to laws UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Report this comment
Obama_In_PeePee_Is_Becks_Art
Posted on January 25, 2013 at 3:16amcivilwarcometh – “Yep even the police say so… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISATXfAUxjc ”
More info on that North Carolina Police Lieutenant who warned, 3 weks ago, of plans/training for martial law (& more overview on related news):
“INN Complete (Commercial Free) Wed Jan 2 2013 Jerome Corsi”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lx7nXC4FafY
Report this comment
OhioRifleman
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:57pmI’m not even sure a particularly nice puppy would want to lick that face…
Report this comment
carhouse
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:57pmgovernment do not want your guns, your neighbors will want them anything else of value when they finish crashing the dollar. then we are all on our own neighbor agains neighbor while they watch us depopulate the earth, and they never lift a finger. wake up people we are being [played
Report this comment
Mil-Dot
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:07pmCarhouse,
Do not be discouraged. They will not be sitting by eating caviar and drinking wine. They will be running for their lives. They will be hunted down like animals and smoked out of every hiding place they have, no matter how fortified they think it is. Many veterans will help us find them, and they have the expertise to get through the thick walls they cowar behind. Shut down all the airfields first. Make is impossible for them to leave. Then pick apart their defenses one by one. And give them no quarter whatsoever.
Report this comment
Yeah_Buddy
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 6:54pmOMG I’ve seen less wrinkles in my Raisin Brand cereal.
Sen. Wrinklepuss, please go towards the light…
Report this comment
BIG_G
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 9:04pmThats right MIL DOT, It will be like the Nazi cadre scurrying to flee as the Allies converged on Berlin. They’ll be in disguise, Hary Ried will be dress as a woman, Fienswine will be dressed as the Crypt Keeper, Biden will be dressed like Benny Hill. Obama as RuPaul & his old lady as a circus clown, lol.
It will be nice to see them sh**ing in their pants trying to survive.
Report this comment
brntout
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:56pmJeez, Didn’t they come up with an anti aging cream awhile back? Or was that wrinkle? Hell I aged 15 years just having to look at the photo……………..Sorry had to run to the med cabinet… Anyway,Genesis did a tune about dancing on a volcano from ‘The Lamb Lies Down on Broadway”.Apt.. But I want mine to be titled “Danced on The Faultline” as it sinks into the Pacific Take whatever That states name along with.
Report this comment
naughtycal
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:24pmshe applied it backwards
Report this comment
Ghandi was a Republican
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:55pmPoliticians who have been in Washington for more than 10 years should be banned from the premises.. 20 Year mandatory for showing your face.
Report this comment
fr33dm
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:55pmThe 2nd Amendment, Our First Freedom – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IuRvDf68uro
Report this comment
Cavallo
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:09pmI think it has little chance of passing, if my congressman and senators want to keep their jobs.
Report this comment
Farmhand82
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:48pmI get the feeling it’s designed to fail. Polls are showing Americans are returning to their traditional pro gun stance and even some democratic legislators are pro gun. I get the feeling this was made so overreaching on purpose so that the Republicans in the House would balk and so that the next time there inevitably is a shooting the progressives and media can blame it on the Republicans and score points with the dummy vote.
Report this comment
naughtycal
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:55pmcav.
Write them and express you thoughts on Sen. Fiestiens bill.
Report this comment
jakartaman
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 4:36pmI don’t care what these dopes pass or don’t pass.
I have ignored bigger issues than this.
Report this comment
oldguy49
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:52pmwell………now we will have million’s of criminals on the loose………..i will be one of them with my ccw and rifles
Report this comment
Fubared
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:07pmYou ain’t alone brother, not by a long shot-
Report this comment
Ceefour
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:23pmUpon mt word…its go9ing to be awfully crowded in those DHScamps when hundreds of thousands.if not millions of legal gun owners become illegal gun owners… Who is going to pay the taxes to feed the takers. Maybe Glen has it right…Ghandi style massive civil disobedience . NOBODY DO ANYTHING!!!
Report this comment
mikem1969
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:38pmI will not give up my legally obtained guns no matter the cost. I will stand up for our rights even if it costs me my life. I will stand against tyranny.
Report this comment
jcldwl
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:52pmGood Lord take that scary photo off the story please.
Report this comment
stopprintn
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:00pmGood post…….. LOL
Report this comment
RedHarley
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:49pmWas she ever kicked by a mule ?
If not….she should be
Report this comment
SquidVetOhio
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:51pmCome and take em….. Good luck with that.
Report this comment
woodyee
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:51pmNotice the three titles under which the lists appear?
Rifles.
Pistols.
Shotguns.
They forgot one list – Non-Compliance. But there’s not enough paper in the country for that list…
Report this comment
Frederick_Douglass_Republican
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:04pmOnly a fool would be unable to see through these actions. It is a bold faced attempt to subjugate Americans. Thanks Fineswine. You finally got me to become a Life Member of the NRA!
Report this comment
Elena2010
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:33pmPlus belt-fed semi-automatic rifles.
Report this comment
guns-an-bibles
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:51pmTry it! I will control my own guns!
Report this comment
Gonzo
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:09pmThey know it will never pass the House. They want Republicans to stop it so they can blame them the next time there is a school shooting or some other large scale attack. It’s just more politics, but with a population with the attention span of 2 month old Labrador retriever, it will probably work.
Report this comment
Farmhand82
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:59pmI just made your exact point elsewhere, Gonzo. I agree. It’s designed to fail in the House in order to give Dems a political bludgeon down the road.
Report this comment
Fubared
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:30pmGonzo
It better not get out of the house. Shouldn’t this hag be brought up on charges though? At what point does the futile efforts against the Constitution actually cross over into subversion and treason by an elected official? It goes beyond grandstanding, wasting money and time- this crap is treasonous on it’s face. They have won half the battle already- go try and find an AR or magazine or ammo. If you can find it, the prices are outrageous. That is what they want and have gotten in less that 6 weeks from SH. We get to pay for the grandstanding of the hag and cronies, then get to pay again when we want to try an acquire what is actually still legal. Increments. Little cuts.
Report this comment
Silversmith
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:50pmSo when does the administration get cracked across the knuckles for oath breaking?
Guess I’m looking for that “shot heard round the world”
Silversmith
Report this comment
Mil-Dot
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:53pmSilver,
We DO need a shot heard around the world, and it will happen. There will be an event, more than likely involving the inner-city blacks that will start the conflagration. And then it will spread all across the country. The Zimmerman acquittal comes to mind here. Then, it is game on. All of the traitors and trouble makers will be rooted out. Not looking forward to it, but I will be there right beside you.
Report this comment
JerseyGuy
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:50pmSilver…both you and MilDot have a point. My guess is there is going to be a “staged” sports complex shooting or a “staged” assination attempt on Obama. He needs a 9/11 type event. If an assination attempt is made, the Black Panthers (et.al) will go ballistic, causing an upheaval in the inner cities that will compel Obama to declare Marshal Law. He’s not going to get what he wants after the Newtown fiasco. Expect more to come. What really bothered me the other day was the distain in his face when he left the Capital complex. We are dealing with one angry and determined individual who is going to get what he wants come hell or high water.
Report this comment
DeavonReye
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:50pmThe paramount question is, . . . . “why?” I want to know the REAL “why”. A FEW incidents where a sicko used a certain type of rifle . . . should never speak to “the danger of something” when MOST are never used [nor will ever be] to “kill people in a mass shooting”. What is their TRUE agenda?
Report this comment
Beachmastermax
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:01pmAlmost all school shooters are on perscription psycotic drugs. They will not release Adam Lanza’s medical records nor many of the others.
You will never see this get any press.
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:11pmTheir agenda? Communism…http://commieblaster.com/
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:14pmThe true agenda is simple: disarming of the people with step by step legislation, and in the process undermine another portion of the Constitution while tricking the people into going with it.
Report this comment
Mil-Dot
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:00pmBeach,
I am not buying the psychotropic drugs argument. These goons were either hypnotized, brainwashed by govt operatives or already seriously mentally ill. There are millions upon millions of productive patriots that will be disarmed if you insist on pushing that reasoning. We need all freedom lovers on deck here. Don’t look for excuses to take their rights from them. That is a ruse. A red herring. That goon that shot up the Aurora, CO theater was just standing outside of the theater waiting for the cops. Multiple witnesses said there were more than one gunman. That guy was a patsy, just like Oswald. The cop that arrested him said he looked hypnotized. More is going on here. But, you are free, you are still entitled to your opinions. Carry on brother.
Report this comment
carhouse
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:18pmcaos
Report this comment
@leftfighter
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:38pm@Mil-Dot
“These goons were either hypnotized, brainwashed by govt operatives or already seriously mentally ill.”
Repeat: “Already seriously mentally ill.”
Again: “Already seriously mentally ill.”
Hense, why they’d be on perscription psycotic drugs, maybe?
Report this comment
BADDOGGYDESCIPLE
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:50pmThe true agenda, as far as I can tell, is to disarm the public for nefarious purposes having to do with relinquishing American Sovereignty. As stated in the bill, guns subject to the ban that are grandfathered, not really, “must be forfieted to the government upon the owners death”, thus registration. You will no longer be able to leave your ruger 10/22 (a virtual pellet gun on steroids) to your son or daughter. That is the goal, to disarm the public over time, to eliminate “a rifle behind every blade of grass”.
One of the founding fathers, “tyranny is only ever one generation away”. Truly manifested in this proposed legislation, which probably will not pass in this form.
Report this comment
BADDOGGYDESCIPLE
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:01pm@leftfighter. Mil-Dot is spot on actually. DHS labels vets as “terrorist threats” and VA is instructed to push PTSD diagnosis’ on as many as possible, you can see it in the PTSD martketing campaign. They will use this as the basis to deny veterans 2nd ammendment rights, two birds with one stone.
Hate to say it, but keep your problems to yourself, carry your own water. They will use it against you.
Report this comment
Beachmastermax
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:43pmIf you have let the Government school system lobotomize your male children with mind altering drugs such a Ritalin, shame on you.
These propogandized and detached youth are not going to give a damn if someone comes for their weapons. They can hardly pay enough attention to reality, when they are not playing computer fantasy games. Come for their nintendo or whatever, and they might notice….maybe.
Report this comment
1stKENTUCKYREGULAR
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 4:03pmTheir true agenda….. ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT. The impediment to their UTOPIAN DELUSION is the Constitution. That being said, the protecters of the CONSTITUTION are the american people, backed by the 2nd amendment, which means the only way the libs/progressives can possibly achieve their objective is to deny the people their right to bare arms, for WE THE PEOPLE will rise up and defend the Constitution before will submit to the will of the DISTRICT of CORRUPTION.
Report this comment
Rob in Katy
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 4:59pm1STKENTUCKYREGULAR, I was half listening to Kerry today, he mentioned “New World Order” multiple times. I wish that I had paid more attention, but had other things going on…
Report this comment
AxelPhantom
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 5:47pmThe right to own and use a weapon is protected by the second amendment. You have no right to healthcare, housing, food or water, so who really owns those?
This attempted legislation, like the patriot act, the virtual strip search of your person, the rifling of your luggage, the screening of your e-mail and the ability to listen to your phone conversations is all an assault against the right to pursue private property.
What is “private” anymore? Can you talk to your spouse on the phone with 100% certainty that the conversation was neither monitored nor stored in some data base?
What do you actually own and can be considered your “property” whereby it belongs to you to use as you see fit and if it were removed from your possession by any entity without either a search warrant, your permission or agreed upon compensation, it would be considered a theft? That list has dwindled considerably over the last two decades at least where the government is concerned.
The number one aim of communism was the abolition of private property. The second amendment is part of that right.
Report this comment
OhioRifleman
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:50pmOh crap, here we go again…
Report this comment
brntout
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:59pmjust botox bullets will take care of this….oh ageing cream might help… Visuals omg… gonna have to clean my screen.
Report this comment
OniKaze
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:50pmOhhhhh… Another stupid law that I will not adhere to….
Congress can keep passing it’s stupid gun laws… I WILL NOT comply… After all, better tried by twelve than carried by six….
I’ll keep my guns, thanks… Everyone else can keep their hope and change…
Report this comment
jrcess
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:32pmIt is ok if Eric Holder gives 2,000 guns to mexican criminals and he wants us to give up our guns, Time for the US to have the Nite of the long Knives.
Report this comment
Farmhand82
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:17pmI hear ya but unfortunately gun manufacturers will have to adhere to this stupid ban. If you already have all the guns and greater than 10 round magazines you want then more power to you. For a guy like me who’s still drooling over this or that firearm that he really wants, this law is pretty disastrous. It means having to pay absurd amounts for the few remaining magazines and rifles still floating around that people are willing to sell.
Report this comment
GO-FOR-LIBERTY
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:58pmAnyone want to go for a citizen arrest of these Washington traitors. Not my guns~~no way!!
Report this comment
JerseyGuy
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:58pmCOPE and change
Report this comment
Beachmastermax
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:48pmAND THEIR OFF!!!!!!
The race to get the guns before the money runs out has begun.
Report this comment
max00man
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:07pmIt really doesn’t matter what legislation they introduce anymore… Soon, the ones who “occupy” congress and the Whitehouse will be rendered useless and replace by representatives truly elected By The People based on merit and their oath to uphold the constitution.
Watch the YouTube video and check out defcad.org — Game over…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=q10Jz2qIog8
http://www.Defcad.org
Report this comment
Ghandi was a Republican
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:48pm10,000s of 1,000s of weapons being distributed to terrorist alliance BY OBAMA will see to it that weapons supply will not be drying up any time soon. This is stuff of the anti-Christ..
Report this comment
Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:05pmI think Feinstein is dried up.
Report this comment
Fubared
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:12pmLike a Cali prune.
Report this comment
midnightsun
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:47pmSomeone needs to ban her face!
Report this comment
moreteaplease
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:10pmHer face is an assault weapon if I’ve ever seen one. Which pyramid did they pull her out of for this shot.
Report this comment
RattlesnakeBoy
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:46pmCome and take them.
Report this comment
WarEagleVII
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:46pmI’m tired of these hypocrites who want to take away our rights while they are surrounded by guards armed with select fire and semi-automatic weapons. This particular hypocrite had a California CCW permit at one time.
BTW, I will not comply.
Report this comment
Beachmastermax
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:46pmI would like to see an episode of MOONSHINERS, DUCK NATION, MUD CATS or GATOR where Dianne shows up and says, “Time to hand over your guns boys!”.
Report this comment
Fubared
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:09pmThat indeed would be well worth watching. She would send aides to do her dirty work.
Report this comment
Beachmastermax
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:32pmAides? or O’rdurves?
Report this comment
midnightsun
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:45pmShe is such an ugly old hag. Her face should be banned!
Report this comment
FlagWavingPatriot
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:45pmNuts!
Report this comment
GhostOfJefferson
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:09pmPerfect response, and it is directed at *exactly* the same political ideologues it was directed at back during WW2.
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:31pmNut’s or ?.http://www.commieblaster.com/dl/Communist-Takeover-America.pdf
Report this comment
kettererbg
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 4:09pmExcept now its the Battle of the Bulls###.
Report this comment
escape_from_socialism
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:44pmI know a ban on any government, to infringe on my right to keep and bear arms, and was first, long before your, Mrs. Finestain(what ever you speel your name, you communist piece of S..)
Report this comment
semihardrock
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:44pmIt’s Obamacare…..for guns!
Report this comment