Glock Releases New Pro-Gun Commercial That’s Sure to Make Gun Owners Smile
In 2011, there was a set of commercials that made their way around the internet by gun-maker Glock and featuring popular Marine drill sergeant Lee Ermey, aka “Gunny.” Pro-gun people loved them, as they make the case for those who are passionate about the Second Amendment in a slightly-funny, common-sense way.
And now the manufacturer is back with a new one that’s sure to grab attention.
The ads all are a play off the idea of robbers picking the wrong business, house, or person.
Check out the initial ad, which takes place at a diner and focuses on a potential robbery:
The second one focuses on home protection:
And now the new one — which portrays a crook picking the wrong woman to try and attack:
Curious about who the “wrong girl” is? Well, you may have seen her before. Here name is Courtney Hope and she’s a model and actress. Her website details more of her accolades:
I’ve been seen in guest star roles in TV shows such as Grey’s Anatomy, Criminal Minds, CSI Miami, Related, Out of Jimmy’s Head, Joan of Arcadia, 7th Heaven and others. I also booked a series regular role in a pilot with 20th Century FOX, called “Born In The USA”, which was a drama and the brain-child of Simon Fuller, creator of American Idol. I recently filmed another pilot, “The Assassins”, and am hopeful that it will be picked up this next TV season.
IMDB adds that the 23-year-old actress has appeared appeared in numerous commercials, TV shows, and movies. She’s also the red-head in this “Messin’ with Sasquatch” commercial:
The Dallas, TX, native is also pretty smart. Her website says, “I graduated high school at the age of 15 and started college on my 16th birthday.”
(H/T: Glennbeck.com)
Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.


















































































































Comments (197)
Richard Rider
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:55amGREAT ad, but only for Internet (too long for commercial TV).
But one part bothered me — the Crackerjack Box front door lock. No deadbolt??? It’s the same security lock (the simple lock in the door handle) that people have on their internal doors — locks to keep out the 3 year old while the adults are “otherwise engaged.”
Report this comment
daniel3839
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:04pmThere needs to be a media blitz from all pro gun folks.
Report this comment
decendentof56
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:26pmAll the ads are good. Some more than others.
The reality is that we need to be speaking to our friends and relatives in law enforcement and military.
Ask them if they would really want to go against friends, family, and average American citizens if confiscation ever became a mandate.
Some young hardheads who’ve been brainwashed will, of course do just that.
Not teaching our Constitution has brought us to some possibly scary scenario’s.
And, NO….the attempts to disarm Americawill not stop.
Report this comment
TH30PH1LUS
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:03pmGLOCK,
great commercials you guys have put together! My dad always had a shotgun & rifle in the closet at home for small game hunting, but handgun ownershp became a part of our family when we were the victims of an attempted car-jacking in Chicago. I was just a kid then.
Your commercials put a lighthearted twist on a dark reality of our society. Thanks for spreading the message of individual libierty, self-defense, and responsibility.
Report this comment
TheEDGE
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:07pmI love how the crooks are always middle aged white guys. Whether its a home invasion, identity theft, or just playing the idiot, white men will always have their place in advertising.
Report this comment
huufarted
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:14pm99% of deadbolt locks can be “bumped” open anyway…
Report this comment
libbylindy
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:41pmto THEEDGE: The reason that they show middle aged white guys is the simple fact that they are the only group left that no one will yell RASCIST about anymore. If it was a woman (usually it isn’t) the feminatzies will scream; if you show a black, you will probably end up in jail even though more blacks do these crimes than whites. You see, the white male is the brunt of all these attacks because they have the common sense to just overlook the attacks on them. When you wake up this bunch of testosterone, watch out!!
Report this comment
aproudinfidel
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:38pmR. Lee Ermey used to be my next door neighbor. Really interesting guy. You would have never known he was famous talking to him over the fence.
Report this comment
DarkJello
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:48pmKeep the ads coming. Most peeps won’t learn without this type o’ messaging.
Report this comment
Marklins
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:25pmGreat ad, except she didn’t shoot the guy.
Report this comment
butane
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:58pmAw, c’mon. It’s a commercial for GLOCK, not Schlage. Suppose he couldn’t get the door open? It’s a commercial for GLOCK!!
Report this comment
HKS
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 4:19pmCall 911, they will send over serve-pro to clean up the mess.
Report this comment
WilliamBray35599
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 6:58pmDemocratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein will have a “bunch of assault weapons on display” this morning when she unveils her new assault weapons ban, including a Bushmaster rifle, Democratic sources tell CNN.
http://theviral.info/article/feinstein-to-display-guns-at-assault-weapons-ban-announcement-2353/
Report this comment
mensa141
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 8:02pmThat was the bedroom door and lock. Notice it was AFTER the perp climbed the carpeted stairs.
Report this comment
SendTheMeteors
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:18pmCool commercial. And the woman is definitely hot and prepared. She even had her gun locked up. Awesome.
The only problem they glossed over was the fact that having a gun in your house actually increases rather than reduces the likelihood that someone in that household will die a violent gun death. In fact, households with guns are twelve times more likely to have a member die from the gun than to kill a criminal.
Why? Well most of that statistic is due to suicides. In a moment of desperation a person gets the thing out and a second or two later, bang, it’s over. Gun suicides are almost always successful. Sure, there are other ways to end it, but they take planning (like hoarding pills) and are far less likely to result in death. A momentary impulse to end your life, if you have a gun, is going to end your life.
Of course there are the accidental deaths from people handling guns and all those kids who shoot themselves or someone else. And let’s not forget the domestic disturbances that turn arguments into corpses! That happens a lot too as you know.
People like this woman stopping an intruder with a gun? Yep, it happens. It sometimes happens I’ll give ya that. But the far more likely outcome of having guns in the house is the death of someone in that house, either from impulsive suicide, or accident or the flash of anger than makes one family member turn that gun on another family member.
Report this comment
DarkJello
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 11:36pm@Meteors:
Balance those negatives against all the lives saved in malls, schools, parks, churches, etc because a law-abiding citizen was armed and packing. The equation tips in favor of leaving the 2nd amendment as is when you ponder the potential for federal, state, and county abuse. Governments have, and sadly always will, put down their own citizens with massive and horrific force from time to time.
The level of hatred in America is on the rise, thanks to all of the irresponsible “leaders” from the right and left that are fanning the flames. Most of us just want to be left alone. But gooberment, in its infinite foolishness, refuses to focus on the basics instead of constantly changing the rules and then trumpeting abround all the work, tears, and money spent on this and that. Meanwhile… the titanic is inexorably sinking into a watery grave. Karma will be catch up with this country sooner or later…
Report this comment
willrhar
Posted on January 25, 2013 at 12:03am@sendthemeteors
That statistic comes from the John Hopkins Center for GUN CONTROL so I believe it as much as you would believe a stat from the NRA saying that people would be 12 times safer if they had a gun in their house.
Report this comment
SendTheMeteors
Posted on January 25, 2013 at 12:07amDarkJello, I agree with the sentiment, if not the details, of your second paragraph. Not your first paragraph though.
But when you talk about “all the lives saved in malls, schools, parks, churches, etc because a law-abiding citizen was armed and packing” I have to wonder if this is “backwards day.” Maybe you can give me a single instance to the contrary, but malls, schools, parks, churches are exactly where people are killed with guns, and I don’t remember a single example where, as you claim, where a “law abiding citizen armed and packing” stopped even one murder in those places. In fact I don’t know of a single instance where this law abiding citizen you mention stopped even one mass murder in a public place. If you can give a single example I’d like to hear it.
Seriously? “Law-abiding citizens” have stopped shootings in schools? When? Where? In churches? When, where? Malls? What in the world are you talking about?
Jello, you’ve mentioned places where the bad guys have killed people, and mentioned not one place where a good guy stopped a murderer. It is backwards day isn’t it? You’re pulling my leg right?
Report this comment
Pacapapa
Posted on January 25, 2013 at 7:41amThey need to add one line to their commercial, “When seconds count, the police are just minutes away”.
Report this comment
battles
Posted on January 25, 2013 at 9:32amAnother bothersome thing was the gun being locked up in a home that only has adult occupants. Your Glock (the only pistol I want) needs to be hidden and instantly accessible. If the guy had kicked in the flimsy door, she would not have had time to unlock to safe. Also, on the first sign of possible trouble, you need to immediately get your gun in your hands. The film about all the dinner occupants pulling their guns would have been better without the law enforcement meeting sign. This smacks of the socialist/communist idea that only law enforcement should carry guns and/or take action in such a situation.
Report this comment
turkey13
Posted on January 25, 2013 at 10:36amShe should have said that it was a good thing that she wasn’t in DC, NYC, Phillie or Chicago. She would have been put in prison unless she was some rich cats body guard.
Report this comment
jstonemo
Posted on January 25, 2013 at 10:46am@sendthemeteors, here is a few incidents stopped by armed citizens:
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=3982722&page=1
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/1/25/153427.shtml
http://www.news9.com/Global/story.asp?S=11696830&Call=Email&Format=Text
http://articles.courant.com/2010-09-27/news/hc-bridgeport-restaurant-shooting-09220100927_1_armed-robber-restaurant-shot-bridgeport-police
http://www.woai.com/news/local/story/Deputy-shoots-gunman-at-San-Antonio-movie-theater/2wFsix5ntU2CDrsHjXx2kQ.cspx
http://www.kgw.com/news/Clackamas-man-armed-confronts-mall-shooter-183593571.html
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2911219/posts
This is just a snapshot of recent history. It goes on and on…
Report this comment
Cartwheels
Posted on January 25, 2013 at 12:11pm@sendthemeteors
Over 260 million have died in the 20th century that couldn’t protect them shelves. Look up Democide, I dare you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democide
I wonder if these people had access to weapons what would the numbers look like. Yes a few people would have shoot themselves or had accidents, but I guarantee that 260 million would not have died from their own government. You see guns aren’t just good for home protection and hunting, they are also great for guarding against tyranny. It is the peoples checks and balances against a out of control goverment.
Report this comment
jeffersonian1776
Posted on January 25, 2013 at 7:55pm@sendthemeteors, I am not sure how your “likelyhood stats” of someone else harming themselves or an accidental shooting (due to the fact that some people are dumb, and thus, they just suck at everything; in otherwords, some people just really suck at life) trumps my right to keep and bear arms, whether or not I have a gun for hunting, self-defense, or as just another arm added to the citizenry to keep an overreaching and despotic government at bay?
I don’t care how many people suck at life, but I do care about the govt trying to make every law abiding person’s home into their perverse wetdream gun-free zones.
And by all rights, that statistic would henceforth apply directly towards the police then too; therefore, making them more tempted to shoot themselves on the spur of the moment due to the ease at which a gun is nearby, or perhaps on their hip? That would stand for the military as well, right? Remember Ft. Hood, when the victims didn’t have access to defend themselves because Jimmy Carter changed the rules and took away easy access to firearms because sumpin bad might happen? Well, sumpin bad did happen, and it was those who followed the rules who lost their life.
Would our own benevolent gubmint ever turn upon the citizenry? Nah! Heck no, are you crazy? Only when the citizens are deemed to be a serious threat right? Only like places such as Waco and the peace
freaks at Kent St. Univ. (“four dead in Ohio”), right? Them radicals at Kent St. boy, DANGEROUS!!!
Report this comment
peaceangel
Posted on January 25, 2013 at 8:33pmTwenty five years ago Kennesaw, Ga. passed a law that required ALL heads of household own and maintain a gun in the home.
There has not been one person die in a shooting since the law was passed.
On Feb 8th gun protests will be held in every state capital in America—-this is only the beginning—-the plan is for total disarmament before the FEMA trains come to take you away.
Report this comment
SendTheMeteors
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 1:01amjstonemo found seven or eight example of of someone with a gun stopping a crime. Yes jstonemo, that sometimes happens, as I said above. Good research. Yes, that sometimes happens. I agree.
But it that what usually happens with guns? Today, and yesterday, 30 people were murdered with guns. Tomorrow 30 people will be murdered with guns. And the day after and, as you say “It goes on and on.” I’m sorry but the few examples you’ve found of the good guys preventing the bad guys from killing people doesn’t even match up to a single day of death in the US from firearms.
I support the Second Amendment and have probably the same view as Reagan and Justice Scalia on gun control But the fact is that guns make it really easy for a person to kill someone else in anger or themselves in a moment of desperation.
People buy guns, they say, for safety and protection. But the fact is mostly those guns are mostly for suicide or to kill another family member or an acquaintance.
Report this comment
enigmaeon
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 2:48pm@meteors – you do realize that more than 30 people were killed with weapons other than guns yesterday and today, right? Like knives, baseball bats, hammers, other blunt objects? More people are killed with hammers than with “assault rifles.” And what about everyone killed by a drunk driver yesterday? Or for that matter, how many people died due to reckless drivers in inclement winter weather? What about smokers?
This gross fear of guns is ignorant, because the media and liberals like to focus only on the harm that guns do. Harvard did a study, and found that many countries that have a complete ban on guns have higher crime and homicide rates than America does. Not gun crime and gun homicide rates. TOTAL crime and homicide rates. Evil people will use whatever tool they have available.
I cede your point that guns make suicide a lot “easier” to accomplish, but I don’t believe that guns are used more for suicides than for preventing crimes.
Report this comment
RedFlyer
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:48amLame, but great concept. Way too much setup, foreshadowing, Gilligan’s Island music, etc. I’m sure there are better “dirtbag” actors to play the perp. Gunny is great.
Report this comment
Silvertruth
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 11:00amThat’s kind of the point. Over the top, campy, makes it seem unreal so as not to ‘frighten’ people that are afraid of guns. It has enough reality to allow person to project their own sense of need for the firearm into the ‘event’.
It’s a very tough line to walk but it does it well. The wrong girl one was a bit long but it works.
Overall, A-/B+ and some style points for dealing with a difficult subject. Just my $0.02 and that’s becoming of less value by the day… (In more ways than one!)
Report this comment
lars1701c
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:07pmIn this commercial and commercials for home security systems why is the perp always white?
Report this comment
TugboatPhil
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 11:17pmIt was done better by a Salt Lake City pawn shop several years ago. You’ll like the ending.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmLxWXJkq1c
Report this comment
RANGER1965
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:45amGunmakers need to stand up, This strategy of hiding, and hoping it all blows over isn’t going to work this time.
Report this comment
jungle J
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 11:51amguns-an-bibles…you speak like a progressive operative…..u talk too much about what you would do to be real..
Report this comment
Fubared
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:17pm65-
Most are too busy with backlogged orders to do much else. 0 has been the best firearms salesman in history. S u a S p o n t e-
Report this comment
RANGER1965
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:47pmI’ve been called alot of nasty things in my time, but being called a progressive operative is a first. Why don’t you go crawl back under that rock you’ve been living under, and get some education.
Report this comment
Inlightofthings
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:27pmJUNGLEJ: I comment on occasion and do quite a of post reading. I suspect RANGER is the real deal and you may have just starred in your own commercial…”somebody picked the wrong Ranger”. Just my sense on this…
Report this comment
Kalidor835
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 5:27pmCalm down guys, I think we have here another case of the Blaze removing a post that would have put Jungle J’s comment into context. Wasn’t there a troll awhile back that was going by the name Guns&bibles or something along those lines?
As for the ads, I personally am not a Glock fan. I prefer a good SA/DA or SA only pistol over the DAO type handguns but the ads are pretty good for what they are. Anything with the Gunny can’t be too bad, well maybe the remake of Texas Chainsaw Massacre.
Report this comment
COFemale
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:45amAbsolutely, funny and effective. It is funny that Liberals want to take the guns away from the people who do not misuse them. They have no problem in not taking them away from criminals because they know they’d shoot their a$$.
There ultimate goal is to become the next Hitler, Mao, or Stalin. You can’t create tyranny when the American citizens are armed. You can’t enforce your will when citizens are armed. Lets face it Liberals are wienies when it comes to real fighting where they would receive opposition. They have no problem bullying people, because bullying picks on those weaker than them.
Obama is doing everything he can to create a revolution and to get law abiding citizens to act first. We must remain steadfast and only react when it becomes absolutely necessary. All we need to do is scare the pants off them and to say “You want my guns, come and take them”. They would then be making the first unconstitutional move and therefore you would have the right to defend yourself. Let the chips fall where they may. They must be the first to act. We fight lawfully.
Report this comment
1FreeVoice
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:58amMost of the people who support “gun control” are not trying to be or support the next H***r, or any such thing. They are scared, and because they can’t take the guns away from criminals by passing a law, ( which criminals will ignore) they will take guns from the people they CAN take guns from. It is about doing “something”, whether it’s effective or not. Doing “something” makes people feel better. Trying to give them facts is hard, because the facts do not make them feel safe. They want to cling to their illusions that the new gun laws will do some real good.
Report this comment
guns-an-bibles
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 11:01amLike I’ve stated in the past, If they want gun control, let them come after my guns and I will show them how I will control my guns.
Report this comment
spfoam1
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:45amThose are all great commercials. They did of course use a G rated ourcome. If someone kicks your door in they should be dead before they hit the ground.
Report this comment
sailsalot
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:58amIn Connecticut, we have to retreat before we can fire. Imagine that! Liberals in Connecticut have their heads firmly inserted in their anal orifices. I will retreat 1/10 of an inch before I fire.
Report this comment
Whatmeworry-never
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 11:44amHey Sailor just retreat to a better firing position, better angle, better cover, muahahah.
When in Florida before the “stand your ground law”, I retreated out the backdoor and around to the front of the house to “surprise” the badguys with my pump shotty, held themtill cops arrived. They tried to explain to the cops they had wrong address, duh, still doesn’t make B&E any better.
Report this comment
ellietoo
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:39amThe ads are quite to the point. We cannot depend on a police officer to be nearby in dangerous situations. The left wants the American public totally unarmed. Why?
Report this comment
oneshiner
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 11:10amCouldn’t have been better, I loved the ads. Right to the point and made me smile at the looks on the faces of the criminals.
The only difference was, if someone broke into my door/window, I’d fire first and ask questions later, but for the advertising it was right on, to make the criminal element think about who might be armed.
The worm has turned and more of us see the value of being able to protect ourselves & family & friends.
Report this comment
CALLMEMSGT
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:37amR. Lee Ermey for President!
Report this comment
AReaganAirForceVet
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:35amI love the one about the diner. I’ve always said that if you arm everyone, (those who are legal to be armed) then when someone in the group begins to act stupid and wants to waste someone, the other sane people will instantly have their guns loaded and cocked on that person. My wife, who is a school teacher, doesn’t completely understand this when I suggested to arm all the school teachers, the principle, and the secretaries. She is concerned about some of the teachers who shouldn’t be trusted with a gun. I told her that if he or she suddenly goes crazy and pulls out their gun to point it at another teacher or student, the other three or four teachers in the area will resolve the situation rather quickly. That’s what the second amendment is all about. To protect oneself against a person, or a government, who wants to take away your right to life. And, I believe that most people, such as most on this site, would join in like those people in the diner. Thank you Glock for the excellent commercials. Can’t wait to see them in my area.
Report this comment
merefbr
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:27pmI agree. The only comment I would add is that even Conservatives have a feeling that there are only certain people who are ” (those who are legal to be armed) “. I believe that this is a God given, unalienable right of self defense, that the government is very slowly chipping away at. We conservatives are allowing it to be taken away from certain groups because WE are not THEM. FELONS cannot possess guns. We allow that.. WHY? A man tells someone outside his company about an impending stock trade and becomes guilty of “insider trading”. Takes a plea deal. Instantly becomes a FELON and can no longer defend his FAMILY?? And we accept that??? A woman gets emotional and calls the police on her husband falsely accusing him of domestic violence. He is arrested and perhaps even convicted. This happens every day in our country. He can no longer possess a weapon to protect his self, home or family. And we ALLOW this? Why? Because as the old quote goes… They came for the Jews and I said nothing because I was not a Jew. They came for the gypsy’s and I said nothing because I was not a gypsy. Last they came for me and there was no one else to help. We must stop thinking that the RIGHT to keep and bear arms can be limited to a select group, and can be takend from other groups. It was GIVEN by God, and cannot be taken away by man!
Report this comment
olm911
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 7:47pmAs I once heard said: ” An armed society is a polite society.”
Report this comment
GhostOfJefferson
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:32amThe only reference I recognized her from was the Messin’ With Sasquatch commercials. Which are, pound for pound, some of the funniest commercials on television.
Report this comment
DLV
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 4:46pmGhost- I don’t know if you got this the other day but I’ll ask again. You said you were a fan of George and Tom. So am I. Though I am curious if you were to go back in time what would you say to them? Also if they were t come to modern America what would they say? Would they be amazed by modern technology or disguisted on how far we have fallen? I tend to lean otward the second part of my question.
Report this comment
OniKaze
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:31amGood Commercials, Pretty Lady (totally hot holding a gun…. :-) ) and good message…
I like…
But why does the article tout that she graduated at 15 and was in college at 16… I did that too… I can’t imagine it’s THAT big of a deal… Its not like I was a straight A student (much to my chagrin) I just started school young…
Graduated at 15, had my Bachelor’s by 18 (thanks to a fast track school that made you attend class for about 12 hours a day….)
Report this comment
mikenleeds
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:30amI love this guy . all American
Report this comment
Plutos_Pal
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:27amThe girl was lucky. She should have had the Glock in her hand the first time she went to the door, not the third.
Report this comment
R4M0N
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:46amWhy? I don’t see gun owners as people scared of their own shadow who take out their gun the second a squirrel rustles the leaves outside their window.
Report this comment
ksmike
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:49pmApparently you haven’t been a victim of “ding-dong-ditch”. I would be pulling my gun on neighborhood kids all night long. She was prudent, though she could have used a deadbolt.
Report this comment
Uechi
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:25amGreat commercials, we need more of them from all the firearms manufacturers. The problem will be getting the lame stream media to show them.
Report this comment
TX_45_ACP
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:22amIf he had kicked the door in, would she have time to grab the gun? I always have one near me. All it takes is one incident.
Report this comment
dnewton
Posted on January 25, 2013 at 11:30amMy grandfather always kept loaded firearms all over the house. We knew they were loaded and we knew to keep our hands off of them. I asked him why all of them were loaded and he told me, “On a farm, after you take the time to load a gun, you usually don’t need it anymore. ”
I don’t lock my pistol up. Those fingerprint lock boxes are good if you are not there or they can not drag your cold dead hand to the input points on the box.
Report this comment
Ironz
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:17amGo to http://www.ruger.com and sign up for the letter to your representatives. Ruger will send emails ot the government representative of your respective states.
Report this comment
MarkinOre
Posted on January 25, 2013 at 7:29pmThanks for the link Ironz, I submitted my 2 cents to Obama and my so-called Representatives.
in case anyone missed it please do your part: http://www.ruger.com
Action is the key, whining about them taking our rights/guns away here is somewhat helpful but we have to do more or like Erefbr said in his post:
They came for the Jews and I said nothing because I was not a Jew.
They came for the gypsy’s and I said nothing because I was not a gypsy.
Last they came for me and there was no one else to help….
Report this comment
nocalifornia
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:13amNow where is Colt, Smith & Wesson, Remington, Ruger, Beretta, Browning, and Sig Sauer?
Report this comment
Tri-ox
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:13amFeinstein, obama and their cabal are coming for our weapons …
http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/24/open-thread-feinstein-assault-weapons-ban-stage-show/
http://www.nraila.org/legislation/federal-legislation/2012/feinstein-goes-for-broke-with-new-gun-ban-bill.aspx
Report this comment
1FreeVoice
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 11:11amIf you think the second amendment is worth going to war over, is it worth going to jail over?
Think MLK filling the jails with activists.
It takes all kinds of courage to surrender control like that and put yourself in someone else’s hands.
We are not fighting Stalin. We are opposing Americans with opposing views.
Even if a small group did have totalitarian, tyrannical goals… they still have to have a large mass of people willing to follow them and/or enforce their orders.
Look at the practicalities. They would have to feed and house….. how many prisoners? They would have some trouble in this country finding soldiers to fire on unarmed protesters, and it would undermine them considerably. Trying to put the rough stuff behind closed doors has limitations too. Overwhelm the system. There are a LOT of gun owners. If presented in the right way, there are even more non-gun owners who love liberty and the constitution. NO ONE wants their enumerated rights treated like preferences that the government can override when convenient.
Report this comment
SuttonShimai
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:21pmMy husband was in a lecture 20 years ago given by the Southern Poverty Law Center in which they said the military was going to have to purge themselves of anyone who had qualms about shooting U.S. citizens. Think that’s not happening?
Report this comment
OregonGreg
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 4:11pm@1FreeVoice.
Guns laws have racist Roots. Thank You for bringing up my favorite Republican, the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.. He and Ghandi learned to use non-violent civil disobedience to provoke bad press for their opponents. Thus they took the moral authority away from the sitting governments. Note, however that in America MLK had Kennedy and Republicans in Washington on the side of Black Republicans in the South (From 1865-1965, if you were Black… you supported the party of Lincoln). Now we need to win back the youth and minorities. I think we need to re-brand “gun” rights as “civil rights”. Therefore, the NRA is a Civil Rights group. Gun laws share a racist history. As one Florida Judge commented on an 1890s gun law, “These laws were never intended to apply to the white population.” The first Americans to be denied their 2nd Amendment Rights (by local “common sense” gun laws) were “Freeman”, the recently freed slaves.
Now a Black American President wants to treat all Americans like slaves. Ironic.
“I have a Dream. ..(that people )… not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.
How is voting For him because of the color an
I voted against him because of the content of his character. Could it be that guilty Democrats voted for Obama to prove that they were not racist.
Sources: Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership., http://www.guncite.com/journals/cd-reg.html, Kent-Chicago Law Review
Report this comment
peaceangel
Posted on January 25, 2013 at 8:59pm1 free voice—–we are fighting Stalin like issues. Most of us who are fighting this are very much aware of the fact that AGENDA 21 is the order of the day. This is an agreement signed by Bush SR in 92 and made law by executive order by Clinton. It is a UN agreement signed by 178 nations agreeing to depopulate the world by 90% and to create a new world order.
This is the reason for disarmament now and this is only the beginning. With regard to prisons and jails, if you knew about AGENDA 21 you would know that Halliburton has built 800 FEMA concentration camps since 2005. You would know that WAL-MART who are a huge part of this agenda on many levels has been closing all their old stores and building superstores for two decades. All the old ones are sitting empty. They are planned to be the schools for the NWO and you can see all these “RED ZONES” on the internet and also you can see lots of former “cattle cars” that have been turned into transport for humans.For the past 10 years the ARMY has been hiring “internment” guards. This is a NAZI. The job description is to ” round up and imprison” US citizens. Many of the camps are already being used.
If you check the case against Brandon Raub, you will find that 20,000 people are “missing” in Virginia. There are hundreds of missing vets all over the nation. You see, the NDAA act has labeled ALL our war vets as “psychotic” and “a threat to national security.” Brandon went to jail because we have no freedom of speec
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:04amKEATONC333, Considering how you have mentioned your family and especially your child here in the recent past, just what would your wife think? Ahhhhh, the liberal mind, at it again.
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:26amKEATON, you idiot. Apparently TheBlaze didn’t care for your comment. I hope that you get to enjoy a day off now.
Report this comment
00100111
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:58amKeaton is a coward. Just like all libs. He’d rather see his wife and child raped and murdered then get killed himself so that the police can “do their job” than actually stand up, be a man, and defend his family.
Every liberal, anti-gun troll who posts on here is exactly the same. Not an inch of manhood among them. Cowards all. They are kept free by better men than they.
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:04pm00100111, KEATON actually said something about the redhead could do something for him. Truly a sack of dung.
Report this comment
Keatonc333
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:54pmand rjjingdasden.. my girlfriend.. not wife yet, and Im with her because she possesses the abilities to A. Recognize a joke. B. know i wouldn’t ever actually try that. and C. knows i will never meet this woman in my life. And quick tip. next time you want to act all pious, do it on a comment worth while.
Report this comment
Techcon
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:28pm@CATATONIC666
Enough with the fascist, ad hominem attacks already. Real men don’t use guns? How CHILDISH. Our soldiers are COWARDS? The cops are COWARDS?
Go ahead and qualify your nonsense, ya little b!tch.
You’re too WEAK to be an AMERICAN!
Report this comment
Keatonc333
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:53pmAlso do yourself a favor and look up fascist in the dictionary.. because you used it wrong….
Report this comment
Techcon
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 5:54pm@CATATONIC666
There are but a handful of effeminate men who lack the hand strength necessary to operate a firearm. They just deal with it. YOU, on the other hand, have to cast aspersions referring to men without said affliction as “cowards” and whatnot.
You are a member of “The Gun Grabbing Gestapo” and, therefore, a fascist. We have 50 states, each with its own government perfectly capable of passing this law or that, but NO, you have to dictate to the ENTIRE country via an over-centralized authority.
Gun control is just another form of class conflict, the driving force behind fascism, a.k.a., “The Right of the Left.”
Now take your bat, and beat your head with it–over and over and over again!
Report this comment
Txcardshark
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 8:27pmThese commercials are great!
They demonstrate the real world occurances every day in our society. It is beyond me how certain people cannot comprehend the need to defend ones self from harm. How they cannot see that these acts of violence in our society aren’t perpetrated by law abiding citizens they are commited by CRIMINALS. No law you can come up with will get the guns out of CRIMINAL hands. So they want to take away our god given right to defend ourselves to supposedly what, let them sleep better at night? I hate to break it to them, but my guns are not going anywhere, except everywhere I go.
I will not be the one the cops come to clean up!
By the way Keaton, I hope that liberal mentality of bringing your baseball bat to defend yourself and your family agaisnt armed intruders serves you well. Yeah, good luck with that!
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 11:49pmKEATONC333, You are simply another example of the Democrat’s war on women. You made such a dirtbag comment that TheBlaze deleted your comment almost immediately after I made my first comment about you and that post. You sir are the center of hypocrisy and still a dirtbag, dirtbag, dirtbag, dirtbag of dirtbags. You can’t simply hide behind your Bill Maher its only a joke disguise. You are the typical POS that most liberals are, simply put. Yeah, keep telling us that you really didn’t mean it.
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:02amThe videos are also available on the Glennbeck.com site.
I love the ‘wrong-girl’ one, especially when the dumb-dumb thug wakens on the gurney and is strapped and cuffed in place. Wonderful.
Report this comment
brntout
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:01amSmart commercial.In the stills her fingers are on the gun,but her finger is not on trigger.Hello safety message! get that libs? Intent to shoot = reason why I drew it.
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:00amI prefer my SIG, but my wife carries a Glock 17, and shoots very well. You should see her with my .44 mag. Now, for that last video, it tells me that only dumbasses eat Jack Links. Apparently SUPAH_PATRIOT consumes this stuff by the case.
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:02amOh yeah, forgot to mention that I am glad to see Glock had the balls to hire Gunny since the likes of GEICO wussed out on him.
Report this comment
booger71
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:09amI too love my Glock, but my Colt 1911 is for fighting, my Glock is for fun.
Report this comment
brntout
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:18am@RJ. I hope in the aftermath he fared better than he did in ‘Full Metal Jacket” Or maybe that’s what he loaded?
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:30amBRNTOUT, Yeah, that scene didn’t fare well for Detective Robert Goren either.
Report this comment
Keatonc333
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:44pmWhat are you talking about?
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:21pmKEATONC333, You didn’t see the movie Full Metal Jacket? Whether or not you ought to watch it again and pay attention to the characters and in particular who played the part of Private Pyle.
Report this comment
kevin542
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 9:59amCool…I have owned several Glocks..all Model 22s 40 cal.Great pistols and easy to maintain..
Report this comment
Displacedsoutherner
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:37amMy carry gun is a Glock 23, I like the .40 in an easier to conceal format. You should have seen some of my friends’ faces when I told them my wife asked for, and received, a Glock 19 for her birthday. The 19 fits her smaller hands and the 9mm’s recoil is easy for her to handle.
Many people decide to carry guns, many people have not decided to kill if required to do so. It’s a package deal.
Report this comment
Tri-ox
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 9:57amAmerica’s sworn enemies are launching their unconstitutional gun-rights-grab today …
…http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/assault-weapons-ban-be-introduced-today_697613.htm
http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2013/01/23/feinstein-conn-senators-set-to-propose-assault-weapons-ban/
Report this comment
brntout
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:04amFeinstein, Frankenstein, what is the difference? They are both Obamanations.
Report this comment
Cavallo
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 10:46amZero chance of passage. If my congressman and senators want to keep their jobs.
Report this comment
RaydocX
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 12:02pmI hope you are right Cav…
i worry msm will demonize as ‘child haters’ any who stand up to the hypocrite Feinstein, and will usher in a Dem Congress at mid-terms…
it keeps me up at night, do we take our poison now or then, but i am leaning toward then, so that at some point even the msm… or whatever replaces it… will recognize whose ‘course of action’ led the nation to ruin.
and because it’s where we’re headed, irregardless of what they do, Glock will be welcome in my home.
Report this comment
SLAPTHELEFT
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 9:56amI love Glock.
Report this comment
paulwbrown
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 9:55amGlad to see at least one gun maker stand up, even if it is with internet videos.
Report this comment