Watch Live: Congressional Hearing on IRS Scandal

Live Now on TheBlaze Radio: ‘The Buck Sexton Show’

Politics

Watch Live: Joe Biden Hosts Fireside Chat on Guns

Jan. 24, 2013 1:36pm Madeleine Morgenstern

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (51)

EPROM
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:36pm
I want one of Biden’s supossed “20 or 40 clip Glock Magazines” …I’ve never heard of that before? Is that a Glock magazine with forty M1 Garrand stripper clips stuffed down inside it?

I also want to see one of Biden’s Glocks that can shoot 30 or 40 “shells”. I didn’t know Glock made a Glock 19 shotgun pistol?

Lastly,

Biden mentioned that we “…need to review the facts and let the FACTS be heard” ….so what about the FACT that more guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens decreases crime? …and that states with CCW’s have shown much less crime than those with all-out bans?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- RaydocX
  Posted on January 24, 2013 at 4:11pm
  hahaha… well stated, but he only wants to look at the facts he chooses to repeat, and call the fabrications and exaggerations facts when they suit his pinheaded goals.
  
  I suspect he was talking about the Glock 18 with its extended mags (a la Selene in the Underworld movies) as if you and i can just go out and buy those at the next local gun show… another demonstration of his utter ignorance regarding issues related to firearms, but he and his boss don’t need no stinkin’ facts… just the hysteria of the press and a profile image to prove to the sheeple they are looking out for the citizens’ interest, irregardless of troublesome things like facts or the Constitution.
  
  after he’s done with guns he’ll address the fireside chat problem of so many homes burning down each year, that we must ban fire.
  
  Report this comment
BladerunnerKC
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:31pm
Did he really say “It’s harder to hit something with an assault rifle than a shotgun” ! Tell that to competition marksmen.

“40 clips in that magazine” OMG, this hurts to even listen to.

“No sporting needs for a 50 round magazine”. Right, but it’s not about sporting.

And yes Joe, I am calling my congressman now!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Robert Treat Paine
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:28pm
Mr. VP you’re talking out of your butt. You don’t know jack.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- tonypro
  Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:37pm
  Yep, he’s using the same much burnt out talking points, and says if a shooter had to change “clips” (more proof of his lack of knowledge) more often we might be able to save someone even if it’s just one person.
  
  WHAT AN IDIOT
  
  How about having a teacher (or person at the place of business, or Church) there that could meet force with force, my bet is the opportunity to save a lot more lives would increase dramatically.
  
  Report this comment
media-bias-steals-elections
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:28pm
They don’t have time for **** chat about guns and infringing on civil rights, and if they do, they should be thrown out of office for ethical violations of attempting to subvert the US Constitution by not amending it?

Here’s a hint: your job is to pass a budget and defend civil rights, not avoid making a budget and attack civil rights?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Fubared
  Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:34pm
  We are paying for this. Where does the money for this propaganda come from? We are paying this drunk and the commie to tell us what we know to be bs. Beautiful. Watch you taxes at work for you.
  
  Report this comment
Chuck7884
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:26pm
notice how the vice president ignores the letter of the law and goes strait to intent of the law?. courts determine the letter of the law before intent of the law. if the letter of the law is wrong the judge either strike the law from the books or dismiss the charge, before the intent of the law is ever heard.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
brntout
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:25pm
No just boils down to if you own a gun you are a danger. His seatbelt reference should have been thrown right back in his face. What do you think about restraint on gov’t Joe?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Robert Treat Paine
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:25pm
By my name, it’s getting to be that time again. When in the course of human events….

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
BladerunnerKC
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:23pm
“Violent crime reduced significantly”. Maybe that’s because of growing concealed carry laws.
I don’t think it was due to your magical legislation.
Safer automobiles! Hey Joe, there’s stats that death rates are going up as your boss keeps raising the CAFE MPG rate and the cars are made of more and more plastic and smaller and smaller.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
SciPro
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:22pm
It’s amazes me how ‘stupid’ can be so articulate … but thinking and experience destroys ‘stupid’, for me anyway. Joe, you need to ‘think’ before your mouth goes into gear … just saying .. Joe is just reciting the present government thinking, not really thinking that it’s the Constitution of America he is attacking!
These people never seem to understand, criminals will always have a weapon of some kind, that should leave the rest of us with the right to be able to rely on our own defense, when Police can’t respond to our need right away and Tyranny must be defended against also, Governments haven’t always been on the up-and-up, when dealing with their citizens … come-on Joe .. Think

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- patriotteapress
  Posted on January 24, 2013 at 3:36pm
  Telling Joe to “think” is like telling an elephant to crawl under a fence. It ain’t going to happen.
  
  Report this comment
Chuck7884
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:10pm
he wins in the court of public opinion but loses in the court of law.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
BladerunnerKC
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:09pm
Thank goodness there’s no federal law against gun trafficking. Or, Eric Holder and Obama would have to be arrested for Fast and Furious!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
progressiveslayer
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:09pm
The dry drunk says we don’t have a right to an automatic weapon,of course he’s wrong, just because congress created a law the 1968 gun control act doesn’t mean it’s constitutional.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- r3dbull4dd1kt
  Posted on January 25, 2013 at 8:46am
  technically the National Firearms Act of 1934 was the first Mandated Restriction on the Second Amendment…All other Legislation against firearms has been hinged on that piece of Legislative ‘Sleight of Hand’
  
  the saying goes” Only 2 things were born of Prohibition: The NFA 1934 and NASCAR–and BOTH SUCK!”
  
  Report this comment
Dkoonz
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:09pm
More lies coming from this commie bastard.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
RANGER1965
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:06pm
….sorta like Stalin hosting a fireside chat on Human Rights.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- BladerunnerKC
  Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:14pm
  Too funny!
  
  Report this comment
- brntout
  Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:15pm
  Didn’t he go on a rant about that guy taking his guns? Joe get the hell off the booze cause you get dumber, and dumber everyday. Run away while you still can. mental illness is already showing. Dementia is not covered up by large words, nor is your rambling idiocy.
  
  Report this comment
- brntout
  Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:22pm
  surrounded by children nodding their heads as he says to turn in your weapons.The communists clap in rhythmic unison lest they be considered out of step and arrested.
  
  Report this comment
BladerunnerKC
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:06pm
Joe, and who decides what the ‘needs’ addressed by the 2nd amendment are, you?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
gyro
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:06pm
Nice chat joe
Didnt your mon not teach you not to lie ?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
WarEagleVII
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:05pm
His nose is growing.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
WarEagleVII
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:04pm
VP Clown doesn’t care if “assault weapons” are not used in crimes. Just ban them because it makes the socialists feel good.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
BladerunnerKC
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:03pm
Gee Joe, your original AWB wasn’t reauthorized because it was ineffective. And by the way, it’s not about hunting, Joe.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- ConserveChrist
  Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:35pm
  It’s all about protecting the country from it’s self. Out of a sense of duty is it only that I own a gun. It is a burden, a responsibility of citizens to maintain our country from tyranny. The larger the clips are, the more rounds we can fire. The more rounds we can fire, the easier it is to uphold our nation.
  
  Report this comment
SaturdaysWarrior76
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:03pm
Traitor! Treasonous Bastage!!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
DougHuffman
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:01pm
Buh bye. I tried.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
bigbear_awake
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:00pm
LIE LIE LIE Lie and more lies

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
TH30PH1LUS
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:59pm
Mr. Biden, would you care to elaborate on the 50 million babies slaughtered in the womb in America?

Or how about the 634 people murdered by drunk drivers since 01 January 2013? http://www.alcoholalert.com/deathclock.html

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
bigbear_awake
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:58pm
http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/2013/01/24/napolitano-guns-and-the-president/?subscriber=1
PLease expain

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Serenabit
Posted on January 24, 2013 at 1:55pm
Isn’t the Democrats attempt to limit citizens ability to keep and bear arms unconstitutional, and by definition also treasonous?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Fubared
  Posted on January 24, 2013 at 2:03pm
  Very. But it comes back to what your definition of is, is.
  
  Report this comment

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.