Developing: Pakistani Plane Escorted by UK Fighter Jets — 2 Men Arrested
Doc Thompson’s 24-hour radio marathon, ‘#24forok,’ continues until 9 am ET — Listen Live!
How Did Dianne Feinstein Get Away With Displaying All of Those Guns for Her Big ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban Unveiling?

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) speaks next to a weapons display during a Capitol Hill news conference on Jan. 24, 2013 (Getty Images)
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) made sure to go through the proper channels when she displayed 10 so-called assault weapons during Thursday’s unveiling of her new proposed gun ban — lest she run afoul of Washington, D.C.’s strict gun laws.
Feinstein’s office, apparently mindful of the situation NBC’s David Gregory found himself in, asked D.C. Police to provide them with weapons to display, Feinstein spokesman Brian Weiss told the Washington Post. Such guns are permitted in D.C. if they are in police custody, Weiss said.
According to the Post:
U.S. Capitol Police and the Senate Sergeant at Arms inspected the weapons to ensure they were inoperable before they were permitted inside the Dirksen Senate Office building for the event, according to Weiss and Capitol Police spokesman Shennell Antrobus.
“We routinely work with our stakeholders during the course of their duties, and within the framework of the various applicable laws, to ensure the weapons brought in for hearings are done so in a safe manner,” Antrobus said in an e-mail.
D.C. police investigated Gregory after he held up what he said was a high-capacity ammunition magazine on live TV during “Meet the Press.” It’s a violation of District law to possess a magazine capable of holding 10 or more rounds of ammunition, but the D.C. attorney general ultimately decided not to prosecute.
Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.


















































































































Comments (176)
mash4077
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 8:14pmhow? why you ask? because she is an american hating communist that’s why! they want us to snap. they want us rioting out in the streets, so they can implement martial law and kill america once and for all.
Report this comment
TeslanEdison
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 6:50pmShe’s a treacherous criminal and needs to be prosecuted as a socialist trying to violate the constitution.
Report this comment
sasquatch08
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 5:57pmI like how 5 of them are just AR-15′s with different barrels and aftermarket attachments, but are billed as “different rifles”.
I’m fairly confident that if I take the scope off my AR and use the flip-ups, it’s still the same rifle. Also fairly confident that if I take off my foregrip and flashlight mounts and replace them with a bipod and laser it’s still the same rifle. Put an EOTech sight on it? Still the same rifle.
What a baffoon this woman is.
Report this comment
sasquatch08
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 6:03pmThen there’s the Hi-Point sitting there, all lonely, surrounded by guns far superior to it.
Report this comment
mash4077
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 8:16pmyes she is a buffoon. imagine how stupid someone would have to be to vote for this waste of oxygen.
Report this comment
r3dbull4dd1kt
Posted on January 27, 2013 at 12:23ammash4077===shes a great example of what happens when 3 major cities get to decide the fate of the rest of a state (LA, SF, SD in the CA)…kinda points out a fundamental flaw in our Governmental System, huh?
Then again, we allowed somebody who isn’t a US Citizen by birth to be elected–twice! (you know that is a requirement for the Presidential Position, right?)
His VP is an obvious drug addict (if he isn’t, then he’s the most successful mental adjunct of all time!)
Our country is totally F U B A R…and Mrs. Looneytunes here is just par for the course…
Report this comment
bhelmet
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 5:57pmDidn’t her husband “earn” his wealth in the Defense Industry?
Report this comment
Wgnmaster75
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 5:57pmDiane F has had a concealed weapon permit for decades. She has armed guards around the clock who all carry fully automatic weapons with WAY more than 10 round magazines (Not clips you idiot). But God forbid the little people should do as she does. And of course the gun laws she would send us to prison for transgressing don’t apply to her, at least not in her eyes. This is always how it is with our overlords, do as they say, not how they do.
Report this comment
weareskrewed
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 5:21pmAnother example of the double standard for our modern serfdom society. Those that make the laws are allowed to break them. Anyone here think they could get a special dispensation to display illegal firearms ??? By the way; I wonder how that David Gregory investigation is going ? …Oops; I forgot; never mind.
Report this comment
Daddy Hawg
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 4:29pmIf the DHS can procure what is classified as “Assault Rifles” by the National Firearms Act of 1968 and call them “Personal Defense Weapons” then i am claiming the the non-defined “Assault Weapon” I own is actually a “Personal Defense Firearm” or PDF.
Report this comment
TSUNAMI_22
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 3:59pmYou all want to see something that’s hilariously accurate? Click on the link and scroll until you see the pictures.
http://forum.lwrci.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=13136&start=15
I almost fell out of my chair.
Report this comment
temple62
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 2:53pmI hope she has the nerve to take this traveling medicine show to Chicago! http://www.chicagotribune.com/topic/crime-law-justice/crimes/shootings/020010001165.topic
Report this comment
Arshloch
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 2:52pmSenator Frankenstein done be doin’ de bosses woik fo’him, so dey be no problem wid de guns fo her. umm hmm.
Report this comment
pwatkins
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 2:45pmI find this very interesting and think you will also……..
http://clashdaily.com/2013/01/obama-to-top-brass-will-you-fire-on-american-citizens/
Report this comment
MisterSarcastic
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 2:43pmWhat a cooperative police dept. I’ll bet they’d do the same for any of us.
What’s a ‘stakeholder’?
Report this comment
DougHuffman
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 5:17pm“I don’t know what you mean by that,” Alice said.
Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. “Of course you don’t—till I tell you. I meant ‘there’s a nice knock-down argument for you!’ ”
“But that doesn’t mean ‘a nice knock-down argument’,” Alice objected.
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”
“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”
“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master that’s all.”
Report this comment
MisterSarcastic
Posted on January 28, 2013 at 12:40amDoug, you are one weird dude.
Report this comment
markeng
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 2:40pmShe is one of the POLITICAL ELITE; she can do anything she wants without consequence.
Report this comment
nothinghere
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 2:39pmin police custody,these must have been taken from the people on the streets you’re trying to protect yourself from.
one commenter stated this will not pass,it’s just a way to make reb.,look uncaring,and be responsible for any future shootings.
with a murder rate of children,and young adults in california,i would’nt cast the first,or the next thousand stones,on being responsible,or uncaring,just as most highly populated cities,and states in america,that are controled by democrats.
where is all the tax money for police protect,and education going to in these big cities,and highly populated states,where are all the jobs for the youths,in the big cities,and highly populated states,controled by democrats,could their constant pushing for,and accepting the unconstitutional immagration they fight so hard for,or the uncontitutional use of americans tax-dollars being spent on entitlements for illegals,it’s 100′s of billions of dollars a year that could be going to better police-protection,and education for americans they scream for during every election.
the democrats give these 100′s of billions of american tax-dollars to,and for the illegals,and tell thier people,it’s those uncaring republicans,and rich peoples fault.
now that we got to see the constitutional arms americans are entitled to,up on the walls of congress,we need to show exhibits of the constitutional right of abortions for americas on the walls of congress,during a debate on abortion.
Report this comment
pwatkins
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 2:37pmhttp://clashdaily.com/2013/01/obama-to-top-brass-will-you-fire-on-american-citizens/
Report this comment
coyote1hell
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 2:35pmThis D-bag should have been in White’s sights….that’s all…
Report this comment
lassiegirldawn
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 2:14pmPolice furnished these guns? They are most likely her personal stash.
Report this comment
bo1921
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 2:12pmShe doesn’t need any stupid OK – She’s the ruling class. Get it? You people need to figure it out.
Report this comment
IMCHRISTIAN
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 2:08pmShe is holding up her fingers and it kinda looks like a gun and simpler to that paper gun that the teacher bullied
Report this comment
IMCHRISTIAN
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 2:09pmcorr… similar
Report this comment
haytanimore
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 1:55pmDoes feinstein even know what part of the gun the bullet comes out of?
Report this comment
edie1945
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 1:54pmIt would be so wonderful if all Congress people, including our President take an actual course on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. I feel Ms. Fienstein put a cork in it first, then she should retire. She has been around way to long, she is beginning to babble.
Report this comment
Tom Ballard
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 1:48pmHopefully, she goes to hell soon.
Report this comment
chingachgook
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 1:41pmO yea the laws do not apply to the ruling class! They only apply to us subjects. Just like the news reporter showing the 30 round magazine on TV. That was in violation of the law with no wavers or permission from the local Police Dept. In fact the police informed them that it would be against the law to do what they did. No charges tough, because the press supports our ruling class and the PD did not want any adverse press.
Report this comment
chicago76
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 1:39pmIn a way, I kinda hope she gets more than she wants. Lets go for confiscation. No sense waiting. Use all that power the federal government has. No one can withstand the power of the US government. Oh wait, except a few thousand cavemen in Afghanistan. This government attained its power through fraud and intimidation and bribery. Now want to keep that power through confiscation of guns or intimidation of those who have and sell guns. It is the way of the zombie elite.
Report this comment
Glock29
Posted on January 26, 2013 at 1:38pmWe must stay united. For those that think gun confiscation will not happen think again it already has. I find it hard to believe the people that do not remember this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tta1qhQZWSE&sns=em
Make sure you write and call your legislators to protect the 2nd Amendment.
http://www.nraila.org/get-involved-locally/grassroots/write-your-reps.aspx
http://ruger.com/micros/advocacy/
Send
Suggested Subject: “Oppose Feinstein’s Gun Grab”
Dear :
The right to keep and bear arms as recognized by the Second Amendment is a sacred trust handed down by our Founding Fathers.
Any attempt to destroy my freedoms under the pretense of perceived safety as proposed by Senator Feinstein is completely unacceptable and will lead to a backlash at the polls as happened after the 1994 bans.
I urge you to exercise common sense as well as respect for the United States Constitution which you swore to uphold. Oppose the Feinstein / Obama gun bans through all means in your power.
Sincerely,
Report this comment