Watch Live: Second House Hearing on IRS Scandal

Check Out Today’s Hot Posts on TheBlaze Blog!

Government

UPDATED: Ron Paul Account Tweets Shock Message About Former SEAL Sniper’s Death

Feb. 4, 2013 1:06pm Becket Adams

Scroll down for an update to this story:

–

A tweet referring to slain ex-SEAL Chris Kyle from the verified account of former Congressman Ron Paul is causing some serious commotion:

Chris Kyle’s death seems to confirm that “he who lives by the sword dies by the sword.” Treating PTSD at a firing range doesn’t make sense

— Ron Paul (@RonPaul) February 4, 2013

The reaction to Paul’s comments from conservatives on Twitter has been both swift and furious:

Ron Paul might want to ask Jesse Ventura what happened last time he ridiculed a dead SEAL.

— Lachlan Markay (@lachlan) February 4, 2013

In which @ronpaul is despicable: twitter.com/adamsbaldwin/s…

— Adam Baldwin (@adamsbaldwin) February 4, 2013

This is appalling. twitter.com/RonPaul/status…

— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) February 4, 2013

Maybe we can get some moron, marginal Republican to pour sugar in a single mom’s gas tank for a follow up.

— Sonny Bunch (@SonnyBunch) February 4, 2013

I’m glad I’ve always been in the “Ron Paul needs to STFU” camp, esp. after his tweet about Chris Kyle.

— SFK (@stephenkruiser) February 4, 2013

Grandpa’s talking to the furniture again twitter.com/RonPaul/status…

— David Burge (@iowahawkblog) February 4, 2013

You really are vile. RT @ronpaul: Chris Kyle’s death seems to confirm that “he who lives by the sword dies by the sword.”

— Rick Wilson (@TheRickWilson) February 4, 2013

I’d say @repjustinamash just lucked out. His pal @ronpaul is going to take alllll the heat this afternoon.

— Gabriel Malor (@gabrielmalor) February 4, 2013

Amash’s attacking McCain for joking abt an Iranian dictator and Ron Paul is saying that Kyle’s murder was deserved. Good day for GOP so far!

— Sonny Bunch (@SonnyBunch) February 4, 2013

But, of course, here’s something to keep in mind:

Does @ronpaul run his own Twitter account? Might be a staffer screw up. . .

— Charlie Spiering (@charliespiering) February 4, 2013

Lastly, if you’re wondering about the references to Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.), the Michigan congressman on Monday accused Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) of being a racist because the former GOP presidential candidate jokingly implied that Iranian despot Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a monkey.

UPDATE: It’s looking more and more certain that Ron Paul did, in fact, tweet about Kyle’s death and “dying by the sword.”

“He runs it,” Campaign for Liberty communications director Megan Stiles said of the former congressman’s twitter account, according to BuzzFeed.

The Campaign for Liberty handles all of Paul’s press requests.

“She clarified that Paul started handling his own tweets ‘since he left office,’” the report adds.

UPDATE II: Posting to his Facebook wall, Paul builds on his earlier remarks:

As a veteran, I certainly recognize that this weekend’s violence and killing of Chris Kyle were a tragic and sad event. My condolences and prayers go out to Mr. Kyle’s family. Unconstitutional and unnecessary wars have endless unintended consequences. A policy of non-violence, as Christ preached, would have prevented this and similar tragedies. -REP

Meanwhile, Paul’s son, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), has seemingly backed away from his father’s controversial comments.

“Chris Kyle was a hero like all Americans who don the uniform to defend our country. Our prayers are with his family during this tragic time,” the senator from Kentucky said in a statement obtained by Breitbart News.

Follow Becket Adams (@BecketAdaams) on Twitter

Featured image courtesy Getty Images.

Benghazi, IRS, AP...What's next? Only TheBlaze TV offers the truth from Glenn Beck, Andrew Wilkow, and Real News from TheBlaze. Get instant access and a free trial here.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (617)

MisterSarcastic
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:35pm
I guess Papa Ron doesn’t want his son to become President. This will hurt Rand.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- SansPeur
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:00pm
  That was my very first thought.
  
  Report this comment
- SquareHead
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:13pm
  You are right it probably will being how ignorant and stupid the Americans have become, unable to think for themselves. Ron Paul was merely quoting Christ as he told Peter to put away his sword after cutting of a Romans ear.
  
  Something smells about his death:
  
  1. Chris Kyle was outspoken 2 weeks ago at the Shot Show 2013, about Obama and 2nd amendment.
  2. He was also probably going to have to testify in the law suite brought on by Jesse Ventura as the case was not dismissed as Kyle’s lawyer was hoping for… If you listen to Kyle and Ventura’s accounts of the event, it does seam odd to say the least. It was a strange thing to recount in his book 6 years after it happened, also strange as it happened at a wake held in a bar, and it was not reported by any news media, nor has any eyewitness accounts come out confirming the story? So if it did not happen, why did he put it in the book? Chris Kyle, has an incredible story to tell without that event, so if it did not happen, then who told him to put it in the book? and for what reason? Chances are that some of those questions would be answered in the trial. But now that won’t happen I guess?
  3. This is political ammo for those that want a national background check, which can later lead to anyone that is former military may suffer from PTSD, and thereby difficult for them to attain guns in the future?
  
  Report this comment
- MK2
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:24pm
  Why would he that would make him commander in chief if he had to send someone in battle that would make him living by the sword,
  
  Report this comment
- sillyfreshness
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:29pm
  I thought taking someone out with mental disorders to a shooting range didn’t make sense either. But in typical fashion, the sheeple beat their chests and rally around the flag and say how dare anyone question this sniper’s choices. It was tragic what happened, but I wouldn’t want to take a live gun around someone with PTSD. I thought that at the time. I think Ron Paul could have worded it better than just “he who lives by the sword dies by it.” Oh and as far as asking what happened to Jesse Ventura with this Kyle, there is a pending defamation lawsuit about it. Ventura says the event was a total lie and fabrication to drum up sales for his book and he has a lawsuit still going on about it.
- Rowgue
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:47pm
  @Silly
  
  PTSD isn’t the same as being an insane psychopath. I don’t particularly think ron paul’s comments were offensive or disrespectful, I just think he’s ignorant and doesn’t really know what he’s talking about. But then that’s pretty much par for the course for him on most any subject.
  
  Report this comment
- ashestoashes
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:49pm
  Do you people remember anyone at all besides Ron Paul who actually stood up for our second amendment rights? Do you? Because I DO NOT!!!..Now..Does it make any sense to you that a man who stood and stands for our Constitutional rights..would say something like that..especially referring to arms? I heard on the radio a few days back that Twitter had been hacked and that innumerable accounts were compromised..Now..I wonder if that might be what Anonymous had on the government a week or more ago.? People..wake the heck up!!! This is a deliberate attempt at going after Rand Paul..
  
  Report this comment
- fatlippedLib88
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:55pm
  This may have been a dumb move on his part. But, even dumber are the American people acting like they never knew Ron Paul is completely ANTI-WAR… And like Squarehead said, He is quoting Christ. But I say, “Keep planting seeds, RP. There are those who are listening.”
  
  Report this comment
- TEOTWASWKI
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:55pm
  Sad to say but I just lost my respect for Rob Paul.
  
  Report this comment
- Ditto Head
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:57pm
  May be the most intelligent thing RP has ever said/tweeted.
  
  Report this comment
- ashestoashes
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:11pm
  @FLATLIPS..Do you believe that wars should be fought to put money in the pockets of the foreign bankers? Did you know that the family of the Rothschilds started the war of 1812 to get their banks here..and did have you seen the history of why all of our Presidents who were a sass in nated were as sas in ated? They bankrupted us in 1868 and have since run us a Corporation..we are bought and sold on the auction block like chattel..The sellout of the American presidency began in 1979 to the Arabs according to Valerie Jarret..Obamas brain..(she was born in Iran..I understand) Here’s a little video to start you down the road to enlightenment..You can always pause if you can’t keep up..
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJy4gSG8Q3w
  
  Report this comment
- rosegrower
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:17pm
  @Sillyfreshness
  PTSD is more likely to make someone gun-shy rather than aggressive. People with what used to be called “battle fatigue” freak out when they hear loud noises, firecrackers, and most certainly guns. This person had more wrong with him than PTSD.
  
  Report this comment
- realindependent
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:28pm
  Oh Republicans eating they’re own….. oh delicious tears… soo good
  
  Report this comment
- MonkeyBeagle
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:33pm
  I don’t know if this has occurred to any of you, but it seems to be Ron Paul is covertly questioning the official story. For instance did anyone here know that in recent days Chris had made a very strong move toward a pro 2nd amendment stance, saying he is against Obama and his actions? Did any of you know that Chris was on video saying that the seals he had talked to are not happy with Obama… It also appeared that Chris who was being sued by Jesse Ventura for defamation, was going to air some names in court as to who put him up to putting that in his book, Jesse had 7 people that were present set to testify, Chris had no witnesses…. remember a seal has to get permission from the pentagon to write a book, I realize theblaze and Glenn don’t want any of his viewers to think for themselves, but I would start taking everything you read at the blaze with a grain of salt.
  
  Report this comment
- ashestoashes
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:49pm
  @3MONKEYS MAMA..I have been thinking that for a long time..everyone says they noticed a change after that little visit from Soros..perhaps he didn’t know that his church is involved with the Rothschilds and the world takeover. What’s that old Pink Floyd song..Money?
  
  Report this comment
- neoconenemy
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:51pm
  Lets face reality…Chris Kyle was an invader and occupier and killed many people who were resisting his and the US military’s occupation. Its like a foreign country invading and occupying America and then some foreign sniper bragging about how many Americans he killed and making a living off that rep with books and training and consulting companies. There are many he killed and it seems fitting that he should meet his end the same way he ended others.
  
  Report this comment
- techengineer11
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:04pm
  neoconenemy
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:51pm
  Lets face reality…Chris Kyle was an invader and occupier and killed many people who were resisting his and the US military’s occupation. Its like a foreign country invading and occupying America and then some foreign sniper bragging about how many Americans he killed and making a living off that rep with books and training and consulting companies. There are many he killed and it seems fitting that he should meet his end the same way he ended others.
  
  While that’s an interesting comment containing a lot of truth, I’m not sure I agree with the ending.. I would have preferred to see Kyle come to the conclusion under his own volition that perhaps occupying Iraq and Afghanistan were not the wisest things for America to have done.
  
  I don’t agree with either of the occupations and I don’t see how your point goes over the head of so many conservatives; however, it’s not the soldiers who are to blame but the ones that send them over.. The average 21 yr old is not capable of understanding the world and its many complications and they didn’t sign up to.. They signed up to follow orders; hopefully Constitutional orders..
  
  Kyle and many like him think they are doing a noble thing.. They are after all taking it to the enemy as commanded..
  
  They just simply can’t see all the other ulterior motives.. They are still kids.
  
  given 5-10 more years he would have seen more clearly.
  
  Report this comment
- tzion
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:10pm
  Ashes
  You’re jumping to conclusions. Moreover he wasn’t calling for gun control he just expressed his opinion that Kyle’s decision was a bad one. It sounds like, to me, that Paul actually believes that Kyle’s solution to any problem involved guns and, being a rather nonviolent person, unfairly criticized him on that point.
  
  Report this comment
- hauschild
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:18pm
  Another attempt by the progressives to divert attention away from what really matters.
  
  It’s still a somewhat free country, so Paul can say whatever he wants.
  
  Report this comment
- LEFTIST_CLOWNS_AND_FAR_RIGHT_JOKERS
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:19pm
  Ron Paul IS the definition of enigma. Of course the guy can sound rather intelligent but more often than than not he sounds like a complete buffoon not unlike Joe Biden. This is the American Idol of the far and fringe right. Of course he attracted some intelligent people to his pacifist (pacifist isolationist before supposed Constitutionalist) cause but more often than not he attracted (due to his more often than not buffonish nature) a buffoonish, paranoid, baby dropped on their head Scientologist-like following.
  
  That buffoonish, paranoid, baby dropped on their head Scientologist-like following will try to interpret Ron Paul and his musings for the non-believers on The Blaze as everywhere else on the internet.
  
  If you think the nuts on the left have a mental disorder… they ain’t got nuttin’ on most of these nutters.
  
  Report this comment
- skunkbear
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:24pm
  ROWGUE:
  
  “PTSD isn’t the same as being an insane psychopath.”
  
  True but the question that needs to be investigated is what, if any, medication the shooter was on for the treatment of his PTSD. Prescribed psychotropic drugs may have been the trigger for the shooting. But, like most of the other mass shootings, Big Pharma will do everything to keep this info silenced.
  
  As for Ron Paul’s comment about living by the sword and dying by the sword, it does not have to be asserted only through the Christian Bible. It is also a message of Karma. And for that Dr. Paul is correct.
  
  It may not be the truth many people want to face but Chris Kyle was no hero. He was a killer. He murdered innocent people. People need to stop worshiping the hit-men of the State (read: banks) and see the evil for what it is.
  
  Report this comment
- soybomb315_II
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:34pm
  See, the right is just as PC-crazy as the left….They only differ in what they allow you to say
  
  Report this comment
- ashestoashes
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:57pm
  @TZION It would be better if we got the facts on what Ron Paul actually tweeted..but the facts are that 250 thousand twitter accounts got hacked Friday.. as for what you think Paul actually meant..you could be right…but I just know that Ron Paul would never do anything to compromise our second amendment..good to see you Tzion..you hold a special place in my heart..
  
  Report this comment
- LEFTIST_CLOWNS_AND_FAR_RIGHT_JOKERS
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:12pm
  “It may not be the truth many people want to face but Chris Kyle was no hero. He was a killer. He murdered innocent people. People need to stop worshiping the hit-men of the State (read: banks) and see the evil for what it is.”
  
  I’ll agree with you. “He was a killer.” Yessir ! I’ll take THIS kind of killer over your favorate murderer any day. Free Mumia Abu-Jamal right?? Is that YOUR guy?? Or do you have another?? Name your favorate killers and murderers.
  
  “Murdered innocent people.” ??? Surely you jest.
  
  Report this comment
- Farmhand
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:34pm
  Ron Paul, socialism best friend in America. Obama has to absolutely love the guy.
  
  Report this comment
- redfish52
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:52pm
  Ok you nutty Ron Pauler’s…what do you think about your man now….nutcase.
  
  Report this comment
- sillyfreshness
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:59pm
  There are so many clueless “useful idiots” out there. Most have no clue who Ron Paul is. Some call him a socialist, some a Nazi. Total clueless. He is a libertarian and against big government and pro civil liberties. He is against the police state that the government has set up all to “fight terrorism” and most sheeple on here are good with it because the “chosen people” ran Marxist Media believe everything fed to them. Ron Paul puts America first and not Israel first, so for 99% of Blazers on here, they have a problem with Ron Paul as a result.
  
  Most Blazers are the very definition of “useful idiots” in their zombie like support for leftist “chosen people” and their homeland Israel. Jews are not friends of conservatism. The vast majority of Jews support gay marriage, abortion, illegal immigration and 87% of them vote Democratic every election. All the people these Blazers supposedly don’t like are Jews…….George Soros, Saul Alinsky, Bill Maher, Chuck Schumer, Barbara Boxer, Diane Feinstein, Roseanne Bar (mitzvah), Sean Penn, Sumner Redstone (owns CBS), Barbara Streisand, Andrea Mitchell (MSNBC) and the list goes on and on. WAKE UP BLAZERS!!
  
  Report this comment
- Mil Mom
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 6:06pm
  Is the story still up here about all the twitter accounts getting hacked? Before I get terribly upset, would someone please check if Ron Paul tweeted this, or if he’d have the Know-How to find his account had been under the control of a hacker. Seems to me a certain dem Senator’s son who was convicted and got his fingers slapped for hacking Sarah Palin’s email, was recently cleared of some more stuff. Wouldn’t he be someone to check out on hacking in to discredit the father of an Up and Coming Conservative Senator who’s holding the Senate feet to the fire?
  
  Report this comment
- LEFTIST_CLOWNS_AND_FAR_RIGHT_JOKERS
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 6:22pm
  “Ron Paul puts America first and not Israel first, so for 99% of Blazers on here, they have a problem with Ron Paul as a result.”
  
  The problem with Ron Paul IS Ron Paul. It’s as simple as that. Israel and Paul’s distaste for that particular ally is just a small part of why most Americans have a problem with Ron Paul. Paul’s anti-semitic supporters are another reason. Paul’s White supremacist following (and his happy acceptance of their donations) is another. Should we go on??
  
  Report this comment
- qualityrkc
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 6:34pm
  What’s the matter republicans??not pc enough for you???people never want to hear the truth. Repubs are just as concerned with being pc as liberals.
  
  Report this comment
- sillyfreshness
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 6:39pm
  As I’ve said, Jews are not friends of conservatives. Ron Paul knows that, but most people on TheBlaze don’t. They can’t put two and two together. They just listen to Beck say he likes Jews, so they follow without thinking beyond that. I’ve pointed out all these Jews that are Marxists, but it doesn’t matter to most Blazers, including you. Pointing that stuff out makes one “anti-Semitic” or in other words, pointing out the truth is anti-Semitic in its very self. Just like being a Truther or Birther or other name calling we can add anti-Semitic if you point out the truth.
  
  Report this comment
- Kupo
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 6:58pm
  Is that you, Time2?
  
  Report this comment
- LEFTIST_CLOWNS_AND_FAR_RIGHT_JOKERS
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 7:01pm
  “As I’ve said, Jews are not friends of conservatives. Ron Paul knows that, but most people on TheBlaze don’t.”
  
  Ron Paul is not a friend of Conservatives either. So what does that make him…. a self hating and closeted Jew ?
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 7:29pm
  After a whole lot of bot-speak and reflection, they are probably right. RP will stroke out with a stranger’s fist up his arse. Only makes sense.
  
  Report this comment
- amtsoundsmith
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 7:45pm
  Ron Paul’s statement is a desperate cry for attention…and it’s apparently working.
  
  Report this comment
- AnimalsAsLeaders
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 7:57pm
  Why do you say that? George Bush senior proved himself to be a progressive tyrant yet the GOP cattle still lapped up George W Bush in 2000.
  
  Report this comment
- Keatonc333
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 8:14pm
  Rand couldn’t beat Hillary anyway. He gave himself a doctorate! HILLDOG in 16!!
  
  Report this comment
- SON_OF_RJJINGADSDEN
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 8:33pm
  @ASHESTOASHES
  That’s like saying we shouldn’t be critical of Papa ‘bamas socialist policies or Hillarys socialist cankles. We just shouldn’t be surprised to hear this kind of thing. But yes Rand Paul is the victim of a vast conspiracy by Anonymous, The Smurfs and Yogi Bear. Keep watching “this” hand and ignore the one reaching in to your wallet.
  
  Report this comment
- texastommy
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 8:39pm
  So tell me Keaton, how exactly does one give himself a doctorate from the Duke University School of Medicine? Any clue? No, you’re just repeating crap you’ve heard, or making it up to slam someone you don’t like. Just like the average 12 year old. Rand Paul is an ophthalmologist. You can’t give yourself that. Putz.
  
  Report this comment
- RJJinGadsden
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 8:46pm
  Hi SON_OF_RJJINGADSDEN, Glad to see that you could finally join us. But, be prepared for some attempted abuse by trolls. LOL, have fun.
  
  Report this comment
- SON_OF_RJJINGADSDEN
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 8:49pm
  @KEATONC333
  Is “HILLDOG” a term of endearment? I’m not saying it’s not appropriate…
  
  Report this comment
- wowjustwow
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 8:57pm
  His son will never, ever be president no matter what his dad does. I wouldn’t worry too much about that. It will never happen.
  
  Report this comment
- Jarhead 88
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 9:07pm
  Ron Paul is a coward, just like his followers. He doesn’t have to worry about dying by the sword, he’ll die in a bed, laying on his azz doing exactly what he has done in all those years in politics……absolutely nothing. Bravo for you.
  
  Report this comment
- sillyfreshness
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 9:15pm
  Oh jughead88
  
  Ron Paul served in the military just like you “claim” so he’s paid his dues. The only difference between him and you is he actually accomplished something in life, unlike you who is a keyboard commando.
  
  Report this comment
- pitboss711
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 9:19pm
  And then Ron Paul wonders why his campaign fell right into the gutter.
  
  Report this comment
- P8riot
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 9:21pm
  I guess this will be forgotten just as quickly as him blaming America for 9/11
  
  Report this comment
- MDECKER
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 9:31pm
  My Mom suffers from dementia. My brothers and I should not be judged by her mental condition as shouldn’t Rand because of his father’s.
  
  Report this comment
- Jarhead 88
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 9:41pm
  sillyfreshness – Yep, he’s accomplished so much, thanks for that huge list of his accomplishments and from where we are at today, it was some great work by him, LOL, F O idiot.
  
  Report this comment
- HappyStretchedThin
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 9:42pm
  @Squarehead: RP was not “merely” quoting Christ. He was fundamentally DISTORTING Christian doctrine on living peacefully (which is not the same as blind, stupid, and sometimes deadly pacifism). Nowhere did Christ imply we shouldn’t serve our country in the military. Stop making stuff up.
  @ Sillyfresh: If you weren’t as ideologically blind as your beloved RP, you’d notice his record in Congress (after HOW many years?) was a grand total of diddly squat bills passed. You Pollowers always manage to make the good an enemy of the fantasy of perfect you dream the world should be, and while I praise the core of your principles, you never do what it takes to get in power to change anything your way, and therefore your results are tantamount to irrelevance. RP has accomplished precisely NOTHING politically and has wasted countless dollars (probably some of yours) on fruitless endeavors to “change the debate” rather than actually MAKE a change. Jarhead was right, ultimately, RP is little more than a coward whining on the sidelines of American politics that no one’s playing the game by the rules instead of actually helping his own team WIN.
  
  Report this comment
- LEFTIST_CLOWNS_AND_FAR_RIGHT_JOKERS
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 9:57pm
  @MDECKER. Rand seems to be his own man but has a long way to go and has to shed some of his father’s more ridiculous leanings before he can rise above his present level of accomplishment. His father sure hasn’t paved the way for his kid but maybe Rand can rise above the nonsense of the old man, his old man’s past associations plus the anti-semites, White supremacists and absolute nutters who saw Ron Paul as their God and savior who might glom onto Rand and kill his career.
  
  Rand also thought the ’64 Civil Rights Act wasn’t a good idea, so the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree in that respect and some others.
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 10:00pm
  SillySally is a nazi masquerading as a bot, more than likely in women’s apparel, as was adolph on many an occasion. SillySally, explain how the chosen peeps were in this tweet story about a vet? Break it down, show where the convergence is. Fing nazi pos.
  
  Report this comment
- WAKEUPUSA2012
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 10:27pm
  LEFTIST_CLOWNS_AND_FAR_RIGHT_JOKERS
  
  Without a doubt, that is TIME2END. Him and Jarhead have been waiting quietly for a Paul story on the blaze. Must really tick them off how glenn beck is saying we need to go 3rd party. Maybe these three dopes will catch up to what us more enlightened, free thinkers have been saying for the past year. The GOP has sold us out and care nothing about the vision of our founders. These neoconservatives will always be behind the curve. We must leave them behind and spread our grass roots message of a constutitional based republic.
  
  Report this comment
- debrarae
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 10:30pm
  This was my thought as well.
  
  Report this comment
- RepubliCorp
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 10:32pm
  He is a America loathing NeoLib……… Whats new?
  
  Report this comment
- The Giver
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 10:36pm
  Papa Ron can say anything he wants. This is still a free country… I think. He raised Rand to be his own man. Has anyone read the New Testament? Ron Paul is a man of God and is pro-life. I don’t believe he meant ANY disrespect for our hero Chris Kyle. We speak of freedom of speech, but when a man of honor like Ron Paul says something you disagree with, you expect to silence his speech. All speech is protected. May Chris rest in peace and his family feel our love and prayers. I thank them for their great sacrifice.
  
  Report this comment
- HappyConservative
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 10:46pm
  *Sigh* …here we go….
  
  Ron Paul questionably ran on a Republican ticket. He’s not a conservative. He’s not a liberal. He is a fringe politician whom noone in their right mind takes seriously. I DO adore Rand though and I as an informed individual know that Rand keeps his distance politically from his father while respecting him at the same time. Rand Paul is a star to watch!
  
  Report this comment
- ashestoashes
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:31pm
  @SON OF RJ WHATEVER..You might want to re read my post..I was not saying that Anonymous was setting up Ron Paul..Anonymous claims to have something on the administration..and that is what I was referring to..If anyone is setting up Ron Paul..I believe the administration is the one to do it..so please be a little more careful in your analogies of my posts..I happen to be an admirer of Anonymous…
  
  Report this comment
- sillyfreshness
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:35pm
  @gaystretchedthin and @jughead 88
  
  Ron’s biggest accomplishment in politics is nothing. That’s what I like. I don’t want laws. Every time congress meets, it’s to make new laws and take away more freedoms. Gridlock is good. I’d prefer they start repealing laws instead of passing more. You sheeple think congress’ job is to pass laws, but the tradeoff is you have more chances you’re violating something that you don’t even know you’re doing. Less laws, not more.
  
  @foolburped
  You’re a “chosen people” tool fool. A perfect example of a “useful idiot”.
  
  Report this comment
- Icebox
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:36pm
  Wait… this is the same SEAL that did several tours than immediately had is exploits ghostwritten and published? The same guy who hit all the talk shows to promote his book? The man who extols war without understanding the bigger picture, like a little faithful cog in a larger wheel? The one who plays up sensationalism secular Americans crave? Oh, right, that guy! He wears comic book “Punisher” logos around because he thinks he is a superhero, just like a child. The same guy who, in his own recounts, is patriotic to a point of conflict with those who disagree (so much for free speech from a Second Amendment champion). The same guy who lied about striking J. Ventura (admitted to criminally assaulting The Body, probably to build his name-brand) even when the bar’s owner disputes the event. Oh right, that guy. The opposite of our greatest generation. Those old timers that hates to relive their past, or talk about it with family, let alone go on world wide broadcasts and promote what they did. Keep calling him “hero,” in the end history will be the judge, if not forget about him completely.
  
  Report this comment
- Keatonc333
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:46pm
  Texastommy! read all about it! http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/06/14/rand-pauls-doctor-credentials-questioned-lacking-boards-certification/
  
  and Son of RJJ….. Yes, i’m taking it as a term of endearment, though i got it from south park. so its probably up for interpretation.
  
  Report this comment
- SUNTZU
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:58pm
  Obo
  He who lives by the lie,
  ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
  
  Report this comment
- Too_Far_Gone
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 12:32am
  Jus sayin’
  
  http://theseason.yolasite.com/
  
  Report this comment
- spikebu
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 1:04am
  Can’t a duck just be a duck? It walks like a duck, it quacks like a duck, yet somehow it’s an elephant? That leap of illogic reminds me of Darwin.
  
  Report this comment
- huufarted
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:40am
  I am a hard core born again Christian who walks with Yeshua and has for 2 decades since the Lord called me. I am also a hard core 2nd amendment rights supporter and more conservative than most. With that said here are my thoughts on all this:
  
  !. My first thoughts when I first heard of the shooting was “He who lives by the sword…” followed by “Judgement begins in the house of God”.
  2. King David was not permitted to build God’s temple because he had slain many of God’s enemies and because “his hands were trained for war”.
  3. All men are created in God’s image and contain His Spirit.
  4. The Lord Himself never raised a hand to any attacker and warned Peter not to either at Gethemene.
  5. When Yeshua made a whip of chords and drove the money lenders from the Temple it was in fulfillment of prophesy (And zeal for my house shall consume him) and no one was killed.
  6. God knows something (many things) about slaying men we dont even when He commands it as in David’s case.
  7. I’m no Ron Paul sycophant but he did nothing wrong here and only echoed what the Spirit had whispered to me.
  
  My best best pal is a former SEAL Sniper and career Police Officer/Sniper who has killed men in the line of duty with no earthly thing to be ashamed of and yet I have counselled him not to take life if he can avoid it now that he is born again because of these warnings and Scriptures even though he is blameless in my eyes as is anyone serving their govt. as a cop or soldier …
  
  Report this comment
- mamatango
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:55am
  I think the folks all-a-Twitter completely missed Ron Paul’s POINT! That being, “Treating PTSD at a firing range doesn’t make sense.”
  
  While perhaps being at a firing range for someone with PTSD in late stages of recovery would be normal, methinks perhaps a very caring, Chris Kyle, didn’t realize his friend just wasn’t far enough along in his recovery to experience a gun range. It obviously brought back lots of bad memories for him. Everyone recovers at their own pace.
  
  I don’t see any boogie men here…
  
  Report this comment
- ThoreauHD
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:56am
  This is like the third time Ron has said something so off the wall that Rand has just had to *facepalm* in shame. What the hell.
  
  Report this comment
- SacredHonor1776
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 3:03am
  “The opposite of our greatest generation. Those old timers that hates to relive their past, or talk about it with family, let alone go on world wide broadcasts and promote what they did.”
  
  Talk about you overgeneralizing and stereotyping…
  
  You do realize that in every war, WW2 included, that there are those who don’t feel like talking about what they did. There are always a some who are willing to talk about what they experienced, but only to family and friends. Then there are those who are willing to talk about it to the world, It those that often help write autobiographies, history books, novels (about the war), etc… Hell do you even remember Audie Murphy, the many who came back from WW2, and then starred in his own movie, about his own life, and actions in WW2?
  
  Is that any different than a sniper, who tells his own story about modern wars? I can tell you there are plenty of more soldiers who come back and don’t want to talk about these wars.
  
  Also that ‘greatest generation’ thing? That’s really just a bunch of progressive propaganda, to try to demonize soldiers of later wars, many who were no different than soldiers from previous wars, and no less disserving of respect. They all lived, fought, and died to protect this country. There were those who commited attrocities in every war, including WW2. There were good and bad people in war. But in most cases soldiers have to follow orders made from bad decisions by the politicians.
  
  Report this comment
- LEFTIST_CLOWNS_AND_FAR_RIGHT_JOKERS
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 5:40am
  @WAKEUPUSA2012
  
  Is that comment mean’t for me? If it is it’s unintelligible. Btw, it’s 2013. Wake up.
  
  Report this comment
- Vegasdad702
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 5:41am
  Wow, don’t even know where to begin! First Chris Kyle was a hero, as are all of the young men and women who sign up and faithfully serve to protect our Constitutional Republic. As is Ron Paul and all of the tireless service and support he has shown in fighting for the Constitution as well. If the tweet was indeed posted by Dr. Paul it was a very tasteless tweet, but I do not believe it diminishes his character, as his post online expressed his condolences and concern for Mr. Kyle. While I will admit we cannot make the assumption that this would not have happened had there been no wars, it is reasonable to assume that there would be much less damage like rampant PTSD and lost lives. I see a lot of hateful stuff on here and it does NOTHING to better this tragedy or honor Mr. Kyle, Dr. Paul, or ANY of our brave men and women in uniform. Be kind, be wise, and be better men than this rabble. God Bless.
  
  Report this comment
- jcizarter
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 6:30am
  Ron Paul speaks for himself, that is what he believes.
  A lot of people on this earth who go to church and pretend to believe in the written word of God, really go ballistic when a person passes from this life into the eternal life.
  I believe in Ron’s right to Tweet ( how gay is tweeting?) anything he believes.
  I believe in the right to voice your opinion to that tweet.
  Mr. Kyle is in a lot better place and evidently we have nothing to do about that.
  A gun did not kill Mr. Kyle, one of his projects that he took on did kill him.
  Mr. Kyle did what he wanted with his life and I applaud him.
  Ron Paul took a different path and I applaud him.
  None of us is going to get off of this earth alive.
  Death is not the end. Man up people.
  Do not forget who created the planet; and Daniel spoke and said: Blessed be the name of God from everlasting even unto everlasting; for wisdom and might are His; God runs everything.
  This murder did not catch God off guard. Mr. Kyle is in his creators hands now.
  
  Report this comment
- VaARNG_Guardsman
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 8:21am
  Are we mad that Ron Paul quoted scripture, then pointed out that it’s foolish to take someone with PTSD to the range?
  
  RON PAUL 2016!
  
  Report this comment
- LeonTrotsky
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 8:46am
  I gather no one here has ever disagreed with their father.
  
  Report this comment
- Dismayed Veteran
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 9:15am
  @ Skunkbear
  
  Every soldier, Seal, Marine is a killer. That is what they do.
  
  Report this comment
- kryptonite
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 9:34am
  Look, Ron Paul baaers, your cult leader has joined the Westboro Baptist Church! Follow… follow… follow. And don’t forget to quote the Constitution.
  
  Report this comment
- sonnetswan
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 9:41am
  It is one thing to protect yourself, your family and your country, it is totally another to go into another country and impose your will on them. Our military is being used as the globalist’s strongarm to get all countries to bow down before it. Paul’s comments have nothing to do with our 2nd ammendment.
  
  Report this comment
- DAYWATCHER
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 9:56am
  I live in Texas and at one point was proud to have Ron Paul voice his points of view in DC. But, over the last few years as I have learned more about Ron Paul I have come to the conclusion that he no longer serves the interest of Texans.
  
  It’s past time for him to go.
  
  Ran Paul needs to have a heart to heart talk with his dad and at the very least push his dad to apologize!
  
  I’m just saying…
  
  Report this comment
- CABERNETQHS
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 9:58am
  Does this mean Ron Paul will be killed by a short antisemite?
  
  Report this comment
- BlackTalonAmmo
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 10:25am
  @MRSARCASTIC: Neither do true conservatives. Let’s send Ron Paul a biblical message. “You reap what you sow.” My question to Ron Paul is this, and it will definitely get the Paulistinans panties in a tight wad. “Did the victims of Sandy Hook live by the sword? No. But they died by one.” Can the good small c christian, doctor ron paul or his paulistinians explain that to me? Correct me if I am wrong but didn’t Jesus say “”But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.”? Please doctor, please school my ignorance of the bible that you go about quoting out of context.
  
  The best thing we can do is get rid of Rand NOW before he becomes a senile, legalize now, version of his old man hiding out in the republican party. If Ron were a true genius, he would have successfully started the third political party of libertarians. But his followers got too high to march and make it happen!
  
  Report this comment
- P8riot
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 10:40am
  since libertarians LOVE crazy conspiracies, here’s one to consider:
  
  It seems like Ron Paul is secretly being held captive against his will by the libertarians and being forced to continually run for president… and maybe, just maybe these completely insane comments he sneaks out past his captors are his desperate attempt to make himself completely un-electable so they will finally release him???
  
  OR
  
  Maybe, just maybe, he is simply saying the most asinine statements to test his cult followers to weed out the intelligent and keep the sheep???
  
  ** before you call me crazy, please first state if you believe:
  1. that the government is building “concentration camps” for Americans… and/or
  2. that 9/11 was orchestrated by the American government… and/or
  3. that the government is covering up alien contact… and/or
  4. that there is a “missing 13th amendment” and you don’t have to follow the laws passed by the legislature of the federal or state governments because you are “sovereign”.
  
  Report this comment
- sputnik
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 10:49am
  @Silly
  
  After reading your posts; it is clear you are part of the ‘Zionist Regime.’ For if you were really trying to educate people you would use reasoned arguments instead of personal attacks and paranoid delusions. It is too bad the blaze doesn’t allow for an ignore ‘troll’ button to rid your posts which are attempts to create more sheeple.
  
  Report this comment
- GetRight
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 11:11am
  SILLY, don’t be silly. Just because someone has Jewish blood in their veins and is a lefty doesn’t make supporting Israel’s right to exist and supporting the Jewish people wrong! I don’t get your logic. It is the same as the people on here claiming there is some Jewish conspiracy because a bunch of bankers have Jewish last names. Maybe you are one of the “sheeple” that is falling into this anti-semetic conspiracy. It seems to pop up here and there throughout history and I believe it is a demonic force against Israel. As a Christian I believe I must support Israel whether Jewish-Americans vote Democrat or not.
  
  Report this comment
- tangonine
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 1:02pm
  @SquareHead
  
  you’ve got a lot to say about something you know nothing about. I advise you to stop talking.
  
  This is a close knit community and you’re treading where you don’t belong.
  
  Report this comment
- sonofgalt
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 1:43pm
  papa ron always had the stupidest way with words
  
  Report this comment
- conspiracygirl
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:04pm
  Why would it hurt Rand…? The only way it could possibly hurt Rand is if Republicans are irrational, knee-jerk emotional thinkers, kinda like Piers Morgan. But perhaps you are stating this is exactly the case — and sadly, you may be right about that….
  
  Report this comment
- SON_OF_RJJINGADSDEN
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 4:37pm
  @ASHESTOASHES
  Anyone who could find purpose in hacking Ron Pauls twitter may need to devote their time to something more useful. And if his twitter had been hacked he probably would have corrected his self…well if Yogi wasn’t holding a pic a nic a basket to his head he would.
  
  Report this comment
- SON_OF_RJJINGADSDEN
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 4:59pm
  *clicks find in page
  enters: “sheeple”
  enters: “wake up sheeple!”
  laughs histerically
  
  Report this comment
- skunkbear
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 6:36pm
  LEFTIST CLOWNS…
  
  “Name your favorate (sic) killers and murderers.
  
  ‘Murdered innocent people.’ ??? Surely you jest.”
  
  I do not have any favorite killers or murderers. What sane human being would?
  
  Yes, the people Kyle killed were indeed innocent. You claim they are not? OK, so what exactly were his victims guilty of? Show your work…
  
  Report this comment
- SON_OF_RJJINGADSDEN
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 6:59pm
  @ASHESTOASHES
  Just realised the havoc Anonymous could create inside of our government…by…hacking…twitter…cough…
  
  Report this comment
- Winedude
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 10:53pm
  How is this going to truly hurt Rand? The next time he runs will be 2016 and nobody will care what his daddy said about Chris Kyle. Scratch that…some of the people that are posting on the Blaze and similar sites care but, as the last election clearly showed, there aren’t enough of you to make a darn bit of difference. I have the utmost sympathy for Mr. Kyle’s wife and children. I know that you don’t haul people with PTSD out to a shooting range with live ammo. What I’m curious about is how may orgasms you folks have had in watching the clips of him shooting. Leave it to Beckbots to get aroused by watching someone that has reached the pinnacle of killing…
  
  Report this comment
RANGER1965
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:33pm
PTSD is not a diagnosis of insanity. Counceling a veteran with PTSD on a gun range, a hunt, or fishing is a wonderful idea. If the veteran likes to shoot or fish. If the veteran likes model airplanes then taking him/her out to fly is a good idea.

The Marine that killed Chris Kyle might have been suffering from PTSD but he was also violent, unhinged, and likely suicidal. You treat people like that in very safe environments and they need professional help.

Whether or not this Marine exhibited any of these traits is unknown. If so, then Chris Kyle had a lapse in judgement. If he hid it well, then what can you do?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- 00100111
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:42pm
  Exactly. You’d think a supposed “veteran” like Paul would know that PTSD isn’t exactly Schizophrenia.
  
  Report this comment
- TH30PH1LUS
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:02pm
  RANGER
  
  100% agree. RP just told the world that without a doubt he is an idiot. Chris was a hero among heroes. In a small community of elite SF soldiers, he made an outstanding accomplishment. That RP would somehow suggest that fratricide and cold-blooded murder were “just desserts” is just plain anti-soldier, anti-American, and should fire up every American veteran. Not to mention destructive and painful to friends and family.
  
  PTS is not a disorder, and is not a mental illness. I have found that shooting is a great stress reliever.
  
  This was NOT about PTS, it was about murder. Let’s call a spade a spade.
  
  Report this comment
- SquareHead
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:19pm
  I agree RANGER.
  
  @TH30PH1LUS
  RP unlike you did not suggest anything other that one should not bring an unstable person to the range, and he then quoted from the Bible.
  
  Report this comment
- The_Jerk
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:22pm
  There’s a ton of people abusing the diagnosis of PTSD.
  
  Report this comment
- jungle J
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:34pm
  if he was suicidal why is he still alive? He was a psychopath hustling the ptsd game. There are frauds out there and we need to keep an eye out for them.
  
  Report this comment
- LeFaux Jew
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:39pm
  PTSD is actually an emotional and physical condition of the brain in which the hippocampus atrophies.
  I suspect he had other issues and its not the PTSD that caused it since the last conservative estimate of Police officers suffering from it and still working is between 18% and 25% and they don’t go around indiscriminately killing people (except for a very few exceptions) ….hard to tell because a lot goes unreported because of the possibility of job loss.
  Its possible brain deterioration had been much further advanced or some other condition.
  
  Report this comment
- SquareHead
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:47pm
  @Ranger
  
  Some are saying that this will be used to label veterans as terrorist to strip the guns from them.
  
  http://www.infowars.com/shooting-death-of-navy-seal-to-be-blamed-on-all-vets/
  What do you think?
  
  Report this comment
- imperative
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:19pm
  @RANGER
  
  “Whether or not this Marine exhibited any of these traits is unknown. If so, then Chris Kyle had a lapse in judgement. If he hid it well, then what can you do?”
  
  With all due respect, wouldn’t it be Kyle’s responsibiltiy to know the guy’s mental condition if this was the means of treatment he chose to participate in?
  
  Whether or not the guy exhibited signs of issues would seem irrelevant. If you’re going to help treat someone with this type of therapy, don’t you agree that it shouldn’t be done unless you’re absolutely certain the guy is of sound mind?
  
  Report this comment
- soybomb315_II
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:38pm
  everyone i have ever known with any kind of post-deployment problems cannot be around crowds or loud bangs. I can see how the whole “get back on the horse” treatment approach would work – but PTSD is not like breaking your arm in a football game
  
  Report this comment
- RANGER1965
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:16pm
  Let try to explain this in a different light.
  
  A significant, very significant; percentage of the current police officers, SWAT, and active duty military have been diagnosed with PTSD. They are well armed and perform their jobs admirably. Yes…there are always exceptions, but most do their job very well with no issues.
  
  In some cases PTSD can be of a severe variety (The kind Soy writes about), where loud noises, etc…trigger flash backs and irrational behavior. Think of it like this. You can have athsma, and occasionally get a little red in face. You can have athsma and need to puff on some albuterol once in a while. You can have athsma and need powerful nebulizer treatments 3 times/day. The degree to which you have it determines what you can do, what you’re suited for, and what you are not suited for.
  
  Over 90% of the PTSD sufferers are no mentally or physically disabled.
  
  @Imperative: Yes, it was. And in the coming weeks we are likely to understand what really happened. If it turns out that this guy was pretty unstable, violent, and Chris knew about it, then you’re right, he didn’t show good judgement. The guy needed to be treated professionally in a safe environment.
  @Squarehead: Anything is possible, I have become much more cautious and wary these days.
  
  Report this comment
- RANGER1965
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:30pm
  Forgive my spelling above. I was writing too fast and talking on the phone like an idiot.
  
  Report this comment
- TH30PH1LUS
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 12:22pm
  @ SquareHead you wrote
  “RP unlike you did not suggest anything other that one should not bring an unstable person to the range, and he then quoted from the Bible.”
  
  WRONG. RP didn’t pick a random Bible verse. Today he doubled down on his pacifism. RP deliberatly suggests by twisting this verse, that Almighty God sanctioned this cold-blooded murder of Chris Kyle. That is SICK. It is NOT Biblical. It is remarkably insensitive, and wrong on every level.
  
  Report this comment
- conspiracygirl
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:22pm
  I don’t wish to speak ill of the dead, but Chris Kyle obviously made a lapse in judgement when he took this guy to a shooting range. I’m sure he meant well, and thought he could desensitize his “patient” to the sounds of gunfire, etc. But Kyle was no doctor — and Ron Paul is. Paul knows that PTSD involves more than just the over-simplified TV depictions of PTSD.
  It seems to me that conservatives are doing a Piers Morgan here. They are blaming everyone but the perpetrator. Now they are blaming Ron Paul, who merely stated an uncomfortable fact.
  
  Report this comment
Robert999
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:32pm
The problem is that Ron Paul is a libertarian, not a conservative, and libertarians often lack that moral compass most conservatives have.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Cavallo
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:37pm
  Ron Paul is a republican. Not a libertarian. He’s a member of the GOP.
  
  Report this comment
- myptofvu
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:39pm
  or visa versa…..not that I am condoning his Tweet “I am NOT”
  
  Report this comment
- MisterSarcastic
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:40pm
  Agreed. I’ve found most Libertarians have the same moral compass as the Liberals. They’re just as filthy too.
  
  Report this comment
- KidCharlemagne
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:43pm
  I guess we can throw Jesus Christ out of the GOP finally:
  
  ————————————-
  “Put your sword back in its place,” Jesus said to him, “for all who draw the sword will die by the sword.”
  -Matthew 26:52
  
  Report this comment
- AUsername
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:47pm
  Saudi Arabia is conservative maybe you will like there.
  
  Report this comment
- 3monkeysmomma
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:50pm
  I question the moral compass of any party who thinks waging wars with drones that kill more bystanders than bad guys is just peachy…. 178 dead children in Pakastan alone, 24 allied soliders in Pakastan in May 2011.
  
  ….and I am a lifelong Republican.
  
  Report this comment
- techengineer11
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:56pm
  MisterSarcastic
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:40pm
  Agreed. I’ve found most Libertarians have the same moral compass as the Liberals. They’re just as filthy too.
  
  I’m pro life, pro marriage, and pro Church; however I strongly oppose our involvement in the Middle East.. And I certainly resent the notion that we must defend Israel.
  
  Doesn’t that make me filthy or just Conservative?
  
  what a dumb*** comment.
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:15pm
  MorsiEngineer69
  Is option 3 a filthy, nazi, islamic appeaser? That one then.
  
  Report this comment
- spirited
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:25pm
  A republican would have endorsed the republican candidate in the last election.
  
  Besides that, Ron Paul sticking to his beliefs and keeping his followers
  allowed / encouraged Obama’s win.
  If Paul was so concerned about the country ….and the Constitution
  he would have run his jaws off about the importance of stopping Obama’s election.
  
  >Interesting that he tweeted when he did. ~~>Why?
  
  Report this comment
- qpwillie
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:37pm
  @KidCharlemagne
  
  Luke 22:36
  “But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. “
  
  Report this comment
- Johnny Cocheroo
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:45pm
  @Spirited
  
  - Blacks only 6% voted for Romney
  - Latinos, only 27% voted for Romney
  - Asians, only 26% voted for Romney
  - Women only 44% voted for Romney
  
  Yeah, shuuuuure it was the Paulbots who ruined it for you (didn’t need them anyways right?). Keep on being too white, too right and too uptight – its a strategy that is working well for somebody.
  
  Report this comment
- bobert432
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:52pm
  Because quoting Jesus is a tell-tale sign that one lacks a “moral compass”…
  
  Report this comment
- ashestoashes
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:58pm
  @ Robert Ron Paul is the only politician that I know of who defended our Constitutional Rights..Name me another…George Soros said that the only game changer would have been Ron Paul..his opponents..both of them actually fought for gun control..Does it make sense to you that he would have said this?..Ron and Rand are their enemies..Twitter was hacked (I think this last Friday)..and 250,000 accounts were compromised..Ron Paul did not tweet that..and by the way..Ron Paul was the only Christian running..he was the only one who had proven morality..He believed in every persons right to choose the best course for themselves..as our founding fathers did..
  http://www.kens5.com/news/Twitter-hacked-250000-accounts-compromised-189572271.html
  
  Report this comment
- imperative
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:13pm
  @QPWILLIE:
  
  Two verses later:
  
  The disciples said, “See, Lord, here are two swords.” “That is enough,” he replied.
  
  Clearly Jesus’ point was not to take up arms, otherwise He would have told them “You’ll need more”. His disciples were missing the point, so he told them that’s enough.
  
  Report this comment
- ashestoashes
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:22pm
  @IMPERATIVE QP is right..If Jesus didn’t want them to be armed..He would have told them to get rid of them..
  
  Report this comment
- imperative
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:34pm
  @ASHES:
  
  I see what you’re saying, and I didn’t meant to imply that Jesus didn’t want them to have arms at all, but at the same time it clearly wasn’t a “call to arms”.
  
  In either case, we shouldn’t deny the truth in the scripture that @KID posted. I understand that Chris Kyle was in the military, did his job, and did it well, but violence should always be a last resort. I for one don’t like what is (in my opinion) the liberal use of our military. I think we should have the strongest military in the world, but do whatever we can to avoid having to use it.
  
  Report this comment
- ashestoashes
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:35pm
  @FUBARED I am all for the defense of Israel..but I am not for the offense of Israel..Try reading Revelations 2:9 I know thy works and tribulations. and poverty,(but you are rich) and I know the blasphemy of them who say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synogogue of Satan.. Did you know that Netan Yooow is a Freemason..he is not a Jew..Freemasons are an entity started by the Rothschilds who are said to be from the Tribe of Dan..practitioners of the occult..and were kicked out..spoken of in Gen 49:17 as being the serpent..They have been at the business of overtaking the world since the 17th century..and I dare say that they are doing a fine job of it..there are true Jews..but they follow the Torah..the first 5 books of the Bible..The problem with helping someone else take over the world..what are you going to do when they come after you..and baby..they’re here..
  
  Report this comment
- ashestoashes
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:00pm
  @IMPERATIVE..I am in 100% agreement with you on that..I just posted a video on the history of the Central Banks..which is a good starting place for anyone who wants to know who has started and funded the wars..and who has as sass in nated all of our Presidents plus John Kennedy’s brother Bobby..And all was done for the benefit and profit of the Central Foreign Banks..the only one who went against them that they didn’t kill but tried was Andrew Jackson..the as sass ins 2 guns both misfired..and he succeeded in kicking the Rothshilds and their bank out..but then Woodrow Wilson let them back in..I understand the only other one to do so was recently, and that is Iceland..They refused to bai lout the banks..and issued the money back to the people..small businesses sprang up in their places and they are thriving…they are actually prosecuting and throwing bankers in prison there .Blessings
  
  Report this comment
- katzkiner
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:33pm
  That really does not sound like something Ron Paul would tweet. Smells of a dirty trick.
  
  Report this comment
- American Soldier (Separated)
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:36pm
  You mean the same moral compass that all the Conservative Politicians are currently using to take our rights away from Washington DC?
  
  Cool story.
  
  Report this comment
- DLV
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:39pm
  Cavallo- Ah no he is libertarian where do you get your facts? He is only a Republican because they are one of the two actual parties. If he wanted any hope for being Prez he would need to be a Republican. Look up his policies they are exactly libertarian.
  
  Report this comment
- soybomb315_II
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:40pm
  if conservatives have great moral compass – then why do they vote for progressives?
  
  Report this comment
- soybomb315_II
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:45pm
  Yes, Ron Paul is only a republican cuz there is no other option. He is trying to fix things within the republican party instead of going rogue
  
  Report this comment
- imperative
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:10pm
  @ASHES:
  
  I’d watch your video if you could share a link. :-)
  
  Report this comment
- pragmaticpatriot
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:29pm
  more like a libertarian in republican clothing, he makes sense until he talks national security then he sounds like barry
  
  Report this comment
- ashestoashes
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 6:08pm
  @IMPERATIVE This is the best video you will ever see..
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1_L30JXpaY
  And this is the second
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJy4gSG8Q3w
  
  Report this comment
- imperative
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 7:24pm
  Thanks @ASHES, I’ll check them out tonight.
  
  Report this comment
- ashestoashes
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 7:44pm
  @IMPERATIVE You are most welcome..I will provide you with more as time goes on if you are interested..
  
  Report this comment
- RepubliCorp
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 10:38pm
  The never-was do-nothing wants a attention. Why should we care?
  
  Report this comment
- KidCharlemagne
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:36pm
  ashestoashes
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:35pm
  
  @FUBARED I am all for the defense of Israel..but I am not for the offense of Israel..Try reading Revelations 2:9 I know thy works and tribulations. and poverty,(but you are rich) and I know the blasphemy of them who say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synogogue of Satan..
  =====================
  
  Recent DNA evidence is COMPELLING:
  
  ——————-
  Such telltales have been used in past research to delve into the origins of the Basque people and the pygmy people of central Africa.
  
  Among European Jews, Elhaik found ancestral signatures that pointed clearly to the Caucasus and also, but to a smaller degree, the Middle East.
  
  The results, said Elhaik, give sound backing for the rival theory — the “Khazarian Hypothesis.”
  
  Under this concept, eastern European Jews descended from the Khazars, a hotchpotch of Turkic clans that settled the Caucasus in the early centuries AD and, influenced by Jews from Palestine, converted to Judaism in the 8th century.
  
  The Judeo-Khazars built a flourishing empire, drawing in Jews from Mesopotamia and imperial Byzantium.
  
  They became so successful that they sent offshoots into Hungary and Romania, planting the seeds of a great diaspora.
  Raw Story (Jan. 16, 2013): “Gene study hopes to settle debate over origin of European Jews”
  
  Report this comment
- imperative
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 1:29am
  @ASHES:
  
  I watched those videos tonight. I’ve at times heard bits and pieces of that information, and I do find it interesting.
  
  My position right now is that I’m sufficiently satisfied with the state of corruption of those who hold power in the financial institutions that I can be utterly mistrustful of them without even knowing their histories.
  
  That said, it certainly is worth knowing about the origins of the banks and of their past actions. I’m sad to say that none of it surprises me.
  
  Thanks again.
  
  Report this comment
noslave
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:31pm
chris kyles only mistake was involvement with the obama mutts?? like the clintons “cleaned house??” foster,ron brown,etc.??obamas got fast&furious?bengazi?,etc.to keep from getting out??

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- katzkiner
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:07pm
  The VA states they lose 18 veterans a day suicide. These are men who are in treatment.
  The total lose of these men per day is 22, or 154 per week, that is 616 per month, 7392 per year. Where are the head lines? Could it be the Communist in Chief feels like “good bye and good riddance”? Google it yourself. I hope those numbers are incorrect.
  
  Report this comment
- katzkiner
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:20pm
  Just double checked the veteran suicide numbers. They are accurate. This can’t continue.
  These men have lost all hope.
  
  Report this comment
Tri-ox
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:30pm
Ron Paul sounds exactly like obama with this disgusting Tweet – perhaps he is now on obama’s payroll?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Blacktooth
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:30pm
Chris Kyle’s death seems to confirm that “he who lives by the sword dies by the sword.” Treating PTSD at a firing range doesn’t make sense – Ron Paul

What was the position of our Lord, Jesus Christ at the moment of his arrest and his comment on the reliance of swords to defend him against the arrest?

51But, look! one of those with Jesus reached out his hand and drew his sword and struck the slave of the high priest and took off his ear.
52Then Jesus said to him: “Return your sword to its place, for all those who take the sword will perish by the sword.
53Or do you think that I cannot appeal to my Father to supply me at this moment more than twelve legions of angels? (Matthew 26:51-53)

So, actually Ron Paul did not say anything worth getting upset over. Just living in this world, and the decisions of our life course often bring consequences not foreseen or intended.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- KidCharlemagne
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:40pm
  “52 Then Jesus said to him: “Return your sword to its place, for all those who take the sword will perish by the sword.”
  ===========================
  
  You know better to quote Jesus or The Bible……..you’re liable to send all the useful idiots that regularly comment here into a tizzy because they can’t figure out a way to condemn Jesus Christ for something that he said previously (LOL)…
  
  Some of the Blazers here would have made great Romans (LOL!)
  
  Report this comment
- 00100111
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:41pm
  And yet you still don’t understand that passage. Jesus was telling them that wasn’t the time for a fight. Jesus can protect himself. He let himself be arrested because that was how it had to happen. If they’d started a fight to protect him, it would have been a blood bath and very counter productive. Christ wasn’t some hippie peacenik. He knew there was a time to fight, and that wasn’t it.
  
  Report this comment
- Blacktooth
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:52pm
  00100111,
  
  That right, Jesus had to fulfil the will of his God and Father. He said;
  
  17This is why the Father loves me, because I surrender my soul, in order that I may receive it again.18No man has taken it away from me, but I surrender it of my own initiative. I have authority to surrender it, and I have authority to receive it again. The commandment on this I received from my Father.” (John 10:17-18)
  
  Report this comment
- KidCharlemagne
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:01pm
  00100111
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:41pm
  
  And yet you still don’t understand that passage.
  =====================
  
  I understand perfectly:
  
  “for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword.”
  
  Jesus Christ was the ultimate pacifist and was saddened that mankind would nearly always resort to wild displays of extreme violence to solve its problems.
  
  Report this comment
- katzkiner
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:29pm
  Perhaps you should read Judges 3v2, read the whole chapter.
  
  Report this comment
- KidCharlemagne
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:11pm
  katzkiner
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:29pm
  
  Perhaps you should read Judges 3v2, read the whole chapter.
  ==================================
  
  Judges is contained within the Old Testament though…..
  
  Jesus hadn’t come along yet…but by the time he did, then he so desperately wanted mankind to stop killing one another in brutal and senseless acts of violence….
  
  Report this comment
- soybomb315_II
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:25pm
  everybody wishes Chris Kyle did not pass away. He seemed to be an amazing person.
  
  i dont know if Chris Kyle knew God or not. But i do not think the christian should celebrate or dismiss killing any other person, regardless of the team they fought for. God does not call for us to be pacifists – nor does he call us to be militaristic
  
  Report this comment
justangry
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:29pm
Libertarian Beck still demonizing the Libertarian standard bearer.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Fubared
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:38pm
  Beck didn’t write the piece, or write the good doc’s tweet. Sort of like saying your offspring have to be grumpy morons. What is an ancient old guy doing tweeting, and why tweet about a murdered dude that died doing something half way honorable instead of spending day in day out bitching? Bitch actually comes to mind on your post. T total bitch. Classy bitch, angry. So your man will die with a strangers hand in his groin or up his ass huh?
  
  Report this comment
- techengineer11
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:39pm
  Although I’m not certain that Dr. Paul said this isn’t that a line right out of the King James Bible?
  
  Do people hate Jesus for saying the same thing?
  
  Once again I doubt Dr. Paul said that; however, it’s obvious that the real costs of invading Middle Eastern countries and slaughtering their populations has not been fully appreciated.. There are real human costs to these actions and this shooting is part of the costs..
  
  Tragic but true.
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:04pm
  MorsiEngineer69
  You strongly felt the need to apologize for you muslim buds in a piece about Paul and his tweet over a dead SEAL? An islamic apologist chump and a nazi. Peas and carrots. Go beat your other half again.
  
  Report this comment
- techengineer11
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:22pm
  Fubared
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:04pm
  MorsiEngineer69
  
  I”m sure there’s no amount of American blood and treasure you wouldn’t be willing to sacrifice for your pepes in Israel… but the fact is I don’t give a rip about those mfkers!
  
  They can all go to hell with you!
  
  Go over there and fight yourself if it’s such a worthy cause.. I dont’ see too many damn Neo-Cons and Jews signing up for the military.. they only like to command them.
  
  Report this comment
- circleDwagons
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:30pm
  Reread the tweet. This is something Beck could have tweeted. It is stating the obvious not judgement. I’m sure the good Dr. has done dumb things in his life. Actions have consequences, sometimes they are bad. Love R.P. Love Beck
  
  Report this comment
- 3monkeysmomma
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:42pm
  I’d bet dollars to doughnuts he will throw Rand under the bus before 2016 too.
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:46pm
  Engineer your vest and have at it. Quit crying and go do something about those pesky Jews. The towelies will take care of themselves. They don’t need my help to off themselves.
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:37pm
  Fubared, I have to say, after messing with Bolsheviks over at the Huffpo; I wouldn’t be able to tell the difference between one of your Alinksy attacks on Libertarians from one of theirs if it weren’t for your handle.
  
  Report this comment
- DLV
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:34pm
  Are you kidding me Just do you not want to have reported on the bad things Paul does? This was a stupid comment by him. Admit that Paul slipped up once it happens to everyone.
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:05pm
  @DLV, I mocked someone earlier today who posted the same thing on another thread.
  
  http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/02/04/former-seal-and-friend-of-chris-kyle-explains-why-a-ptsd-sufferer-would-be-at-a-range-and-cautions-anti-gun-advocates/
  
  As a RP supporter and veteran with PTSD, I disagree with Ron Paul’s statement. And Lew Rockwell, who posted in favor of the comment. I pretty much agree with Ranger’s take on the subject above. While I disagree with RP, I don’t find it offensive. I just think he needs to think about it some more. Seems he’s not really treating the sufferers of PTSD as a individuals (his gig) here.
  
  Fair enough?
  
  Report this comment
- soybomb315_II
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:31pm
  for the record, ron paul was the only one who talked about PTSD in the republican primary. he drew attention to the problem of our returning vets and urged more funding to understand it….In light of that, his comment seems out of line.
  
  However, In my opinion Chris Kyle was too enamored with war and the idea of killing on the battlefield. We are built with a competitive spirit and sense of comrade, but we must control it or we turn into savages. War is hell – that is all it is.
  
  Report this comment
- DLV
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:42pm
  Just- yes fair enough. Like you said he should have just thought about it some more.
  
  Soy- So what? He likes battle and I don’t think he was the type of person to go on civilian killing sprees. But he is an awesome warrior, Spartan-like I respect that. We need people like him if we are going to counter wussifying our military. Oh, yes, I believe our military is going down the tubes with all these latest “reforms.”
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:52pm
  Angry
  FU. So RP will croak out with a strangers fist in his arse. I get it. Goose/gander crap right. After speaking with some of the women at the 0 network, I understand your handle.
  
  Report this comment
- soybomb315_II
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:53pm
  @DLV
  first of all, i said nothing about civilian killings so dont go there. What is this “wussifying military” you are talking about…….Our military is the most efficient killing machine that has ever existed on the planet. If you dont want a wussified military, then you should be against standing army. The reforms and goals of the military have become a joke because we have turned war into a joke.
  
  Question: Do you remember learning about gladiators and ancient rome? Do you think that was a symbol of greatness or weakness in society
  
  Report this comment
- PaulAnn
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 6:56pm
  Libertarian standard bearer? Really…you would think he would have gotten more than 13% of the vote…that to me is an also ran, not a standard bearer of a party.
  
  Report this comment
- LEFTIST_CLOWNS_AND_FAR_RIGHT_JOKERS
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 7:40pm
  “Libertarian standard bearer”
  
  Ron Paul couldn’t make it in the Libertarian Party just as he couldn’t make it in the Republican Party as a “standard bearer.” He was the Libertarian Party “standard bearer” in ’88, got his ass kicked and realized after resigning from the Republican Party he needed the Republican Party more than it needed him and came crawling back on bended knee. That’s what happens when you have rubes in your district. That is what kept getting the likes of Nancy Pelosi, Barbara Boxer, Harry Reid etc elected. Rubes.
  
  Ron Paul didn’t come alone though when he came back to the Republican Party either. He brought every far and fringe right nutcase with him to the GOP like a anchor around the Party’s neck. The Tea Party went through the same problem with this fringe element most recently.
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 8:03pm
  @PaulAnn / LEFTIST_CLOWNS_AND_FAR_RIGHT_JOKERS
  
  Yes, standard bearer. Can either of you even name another prominent Libertarian? Are there any Libertarians who have come out against Ron Paul being the big kahuna of the party? Can either of you any libertarian has given us more recognition? Can either of you explain why all the little sub factions of Libertarians who bicker among themselves ALL love the guy? Did you hear the Libertarian party nominee stated that he would not have ran if Ron Paul was still in the race? Lastly can you tell me why all the libertarians are called “Paulbots”? Quit being stupid little agitators.
  
  Report this comment
- LEFTIST_CLOWNS_AND_FAR_RIGHT_JOKERS
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 8:41pm
  @ANGRYMAN.
  
  Wouldn’t you say that Gary Johnson was this year’s prominent Libertarian cause celeb who got his ass handed to him like Ron Paul did in ’88. Or do you not consider Gary Johnson a real Libertarian? Or was it that he just a guy looking for a home because he was PO’d at the Republican Party?
  
  Report this comment
- LEFTIST_CLOWNS_AND_FAR_RIGHT_JOKERS
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 9:00pm
  @ANGRYMAN. I forgot… you had other questions for this stupid little agitator. Ask nicely and you may recieve a response. Or kiss my ass like Ron Paul told Ronald Reagan in so many words.
  
  You “Paulbots” (as you wrote) are easily ANGERED and AGITATED. Don’t carry a weapon beyond your home is my advice.
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 9:08pm
  That’s right, Gary Johnson, the Libertarian nominee, stated he would not have ran if Ron Paul were still in the race. So, if the Libertarian nominee said he would defer to Paul; who is the head mofo in charge, really? One could argue Murray Rothbard was the man, but how many people would have known who he was had Ron Paul not brought his philosophies into the mainstream debate? (and he’s dead) You have no argument so shew!
  
  Report this comment
- LEFTIST_CLOWNS_AND_FAR_RIGHT_JOKERS
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 9:38pm
  ANGRYMAN. I get the distinct feeling you are a former “innocent” Ron Paul supporter who was attracted to Ron Paul’s feel-good rhetoric regarding the Constitution, small government, freedom and liberty who picked up a couple names along the way like Murray Rothbard for one.
  
  If you know Murray Rothbard then you must know Lew Rockwell. And if you want to write about Ron Paul’s sick brand of Libertarianism with any sense of credibility and accuracy, Rockwell’s name must be included. If you are okay with the history of how Ron Paul came to be in his present Libertarian / Paleo-Libertarian mindset and are okay with the likes of Rothbard and Rockwell playing a part in that process. Then you are nothing more than an empty vessel and not worthy of any further discussion with myself or anyone who has taken the time to research these characters.
  
  Scat rookie.
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 9:52pm
  I see Time2 got a new account. Bolshevik engineer.
  
  Report this comment
- DLV
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 10:08pm
  Soy- You didn’t say anything about civilian killings, I was more or less just bringing in the leftist argument, but I digress.
  
  We are indeed one of the greatest militaries on the planet. Now certainly. Probably not of all time. Alexander the Great’s army was undefeated. As far as I know Napoleon was only defeated once at Waterloo. Rome at its height was probably the greatest military power on the planet during the time of the good emperors, Augustus, Hadrian, Trajan, etc. My point was all these reforms are killing us because politicans think it’s a good idea to turn the military into a social experiment instead of what is purely pragmatic. Women are not meant for grunt work and should not be in that position. Look at the article on the blaze about the uncomfortable question of political correctness about women in the military and Beck’s interview with navy seals marines and even a female marine. She may shock you. Someone said if you could only have a military of men or women not a mix which would it be? If the answer is all men adding women into the grunt work category is only weakening us. I rest my case as it seems you understood my point in the first place.
  
  As for you answer to your question it’s this: I’m a history major and my favorite time period in history is Rome absolutely with early America tying for second with some other ancient civilizations and middle age Europe. Continued…
  
  Report this comment
- DLV
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 10:11pm
  Soy- The gladiatorial ring was only legal under a couple of Emperors. Most people say it as morally reprehensible. That said, it was a weakness in society because they were using slaves and prisoners of war to kill each other for entertainment. However, that’s a far stretch to having the most bad@$$ military in the world. I respect the Roman military…. for the most part.
  
  Report this comment
- nzkiwi
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 10:48pm
  @ Soy
  
  Sorry, I’ve only just now spotted your question. I have to ration out my time a bit on the Blaze because of other committments. I wish I could spend more time on this site as it provides a stimulating education – coming not the least from the other commenters.
  
  The answer is “Marlborough Sounds” at the top of the South Island.
  
  Report this comment
- soybomb315_II
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:01pm
  Roger that NZkiwi!
  
  Welcome back Time2
  
  Report this comment
- TCPatriot
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 3:24am
  Just angry what in the name of G-d are you talking about! Sounds like a proggycan’ stay on topic if their is an insult to be hurled.
  
  Report this comment
Locked
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:28pm
So insensitive to the dead! I understand the point (PTSD and a firing range? That sure doesn’t sound safe, I agree), but gosh, way to pick the worst possible way to say it!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- imperative
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:15pm
  By quoting Scripture, or by sending it via Twitter? Not sure what you mean.
  
  Report this comment
- Locked
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:01pm
  @Imperative
  
  By the manner he conveyed his meaning. I find WBC to be just as offensive when they quote Scripture via Twitter about dead US soldiers burning in Hell.
  
  There’re these things called tact, empathy and compassion, and Ron Paul’s tweet lacked all three!
  
  Report this comment
- soybomb315_II
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:47pm
  yes it should have been phrased better.
  
  Ron Paul has talked about PTSD for a long time. He is the only one to talk about it on the campaign trail. This is the only issue i have ever heard him say the government should spend more money on
  
  Report this comment
- imperative
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:16pm
  @LOCKED
  
  Thanks for clarifying. I guess I do see it is quite blunt, which can rub people the wrong way. I don’t have any particular personal admiration (or disdain) for this Chris Kyle, so I guess I’m seeing it in a more detached manner than some others may.
  
  Report this comment
UNINFORMED
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:26pm
He forgot to take his meds.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- pragmaticpatriot
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:33pm
  meds seem most likely to me. politicians grabbing a microphone or keyboard when someone dies to advance an agenda is vile and uncouth to me.
  
  Report this comment
GroundZero is Nuclear Demolition x3
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:24pm
Just goes to show how bad “the truth hurts” those who do not have a defensible position.

Nazi’s defended murdering people as well.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Lord_Frostwind
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:53pm
  People have always been called upon to take the lives of other men. All the bible thumpers seem to conveniently ignore that the God of the Old Testament and God of the New Testament are one and the same. Don’t be so quick to usurp His position of judgement whether those deaths were justified or not.
  
  Report this comment
- imperative
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:52pm
  Yeah, I honestly don’t understand why people are outraged by this..
  
  I also don’t understand why people on this site feel compelled to absolutely deify or demonize people. Seems like they’re just looking for something to either worship or attack.
  
  Report this comment
- Johnny Cocheroo
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:23pm
  @imperitive
  
  Agreed. Many here do not want to think, just to attack and cause pain. Those that do offer up arguments with facts are simply met with ad-hominem attacks.
  
  I was hoping that this site would be similar to the comment section of the wsj.com. Critically considered comments are so refreshing.
  
  Report this comment
- imperative
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:41pm
  @JOHNNY
  
  I should check that out. The hostility of some of the people here is really just disappointing. Even if I disagree with someone, it shouldn’t mean we can’t have a respectful conversation.
  
  Report this comment
- SolitudeBliss
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 8:58pm
  Excuse me but Chris Kyle died doing something very decent, he tried to help a troubled young man with some issues that only those that have served in combat would understand. Chris Kyle lost his life in the most selfless and noble of ways, helping his fellow man. Shame on anyone who does not recognize that. How many of you volunteer YOUR time for something worthy?
  
  Report this comment
LeadNotFollow
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:23pm
Ron Paul is a senile old fool.
Why does the media even bother to cover anything he says or does?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- MisterSarcastic
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:29pm
  Because this is something we all want to know. Well, everybody but you a Soybomb and the like.
  
  Report this comment
- imperative
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:00pm
  What exactly is it about Ron Paul that bothers people so much? He’s certainly not a perfect human being, but he sure seems more conservative than most Republicans. So why does he make people on this site so angry?
  
  Report this comment
- rosegrower
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:15pm
  Because he’s a Republican and he’s a goof. He is what the media wants everyone to think is typical for those who vote “R”.
  
  Report this comment
- imperative
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:22pm
  @ROSEGROWER
  
  But with all due respect, this is exactly what I mean. I understand you’re saying he’s a “goof”, but I don’t understand why. What is so objectionable about him that he should earn such vehement expressions of contempt from people?
  
  Report this comment
- ashestoashes
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:09pm
  @LEADNOTFOLLOW..I guess you think that someone who does not believe fighting blood money wars is necessary..someone who is not led by Communists..someone who is for the individuals right to choose..someone who is pro life..from birth to death…someone who has staunchly defined our Constitutional rights…someone who is a Christian..and who has led an honorable life as a doctor who has saved lives..has been married to the same woman and has a beautiful family and has served all of his time in office defending our freedom..is a goof? Someone who was willing to accept below average pay for his service..and who put money back into the treasury..Yeah..he really is an old goof..
  
  Report this comment
- soybomb315_II
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:44pm
  @imperative
  “What exactly is it about Ron Paul that bothers people so much?”
  
  I’ll tell you. It is because Ron Paul is true to the core principles that many around here know in their conscience. But in order to be true to those principles, these folks would have to go against republican orthodoxy on certain issues.
  
  I am not saying Ron Paul is a messianic figure, but let me say that Jesus was hated by the Hebrew leaders in a similar fashion. As Glenn Beck says, ‘the truth will make you free – but first it will piss you off”….Many around here are stuck on the ‘pissed off’ phase
  
  Report this comment
- LEFTIST_CLOWNS_AND_FAR_RIGHT_JOKERS
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:55pm
  “What exactly is it about Ron Paul that bothers people so much?”
  
  His obvious anti-American and pro-islamic rhetoric. Not unlike Obama.
  
  Report this comment
- imperative
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:22pm
  @SOYBOMB
  
  Maybe that’s why. It just seems so strange that folks are so passionately opposed to someone who at least seems to embrace core conservative fundamentals.
  
  He’s sure not perfect. I think there’s plenty of room for valid criticism, but at the same time I can’t find any reason for such apparent hatred.
  
  Report this comment
- imperative
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:24pm
  @LEFTIST_CLOWNS…
  
  Could you please provide examples of what you mean? I haven’t heard him say anything that would lead me to that conclusion, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t there.
  
  Thanks.
  
  Report this comment
- soybomb315_II
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:45pm
  @imperative
  Yea, it is weird. I didnt like Romney cuz he is a moderte and flip flopper – but even people like myself did not say the kind of things they say about ron paul…..And to top it off – they say ron paul’s supporters are too few to make a difference – which brings us back to the original question….
  
  Report this comment
- LEFTIST_CLOWNS_AND_FAR_RIGHT_JOKERS
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 6:05pm
  @IMPERATIVE
  
  I’ll give you one example right off the top of my head. A quote that Paul made during a debate about Bin Laden and Al Qaeda.
  
  On 9/11, his position is that we started it. “Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda have been explicit [...] and they wrote and said that we attacked America because you had bases on our holy land in Saudi Arabia, you do not give Palestinians fair treatment, and you have been bombing [...] we had been bombing and killing hundreds of thousands of Iraqis for 10 years.”
  
  Which is patently false and the idea that Bin Laden was justified along with his accomplices murder of innocent Americans was very, very dangerous and patently anti-American IMO.
  
  Report this comment
- imperative
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 6:42pm
  @LEFTIST_CLOWNS…
  
  I do remember that during the debate, but (go easy on me here) I really don’t think he was saying that Osama bin Laden was justified in any way. My understanding is that he was just quoting the CIA’s assessment of what motivated the attack.
  
  There may be disagreement on some of the things that the USA has done overseas, but I don’t think any of us believes that 9/11 was a justified response.
  
  In a similar way, people disagree with each other on the government’s behavior at Waco and Ruby Ridge, but Timothy McVeigh’s response to those events was clearly unjustified. So if I cite those as the things that motivated McVeigh to do what he did, and if I even agree that what the government did was wrong, it doesn’t mean that I condone what McVeigh did.
  
  That’s why I didn’t really have a problem with what Ron Paul said. I don’t agree with every bit of his foreign policy, but generally I think it’s very conservative, and is very similar to the platform that GW Bush ran on in 2000.
  
  Report this comment
- LEFTIST_CLOWNS_AND_FAR_RIGHT_JOKERS
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 7:19pm
  @IMPERATIVE
  
  “My understanding is that he was just quoting the CIA’s assessment of what motivated the attack.
  
  What Ron Paul was doing was parroting Bin Laden and Al Qaeda. He called America an instigator and bully around the world. Ron Paul was a bigger apologizer for America’s mostly noble role around the world than Obama himself. Ron Paul is an isolationist and tried to use the Constitution to back up his isolationist musings.
  
  Also, I wouldn’t be comparing Ron Paul to Bush in any way (Paul supporters will vilify you for it). He can however be compared to Neville Chamberlain if you’re looking for a mirror image. Not to mention Lyndon Larouche or L. Ron Hubbard in other ways.
  
  Report this comment
- imperative
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 7:42pm
  @LEFTIST_CLOWNS…
  
  No, I didn’t mean a mirror image. Just the foreign policy that GW Bush campaigned on during 2000. His presidency was quite different.
  
  And yes, I think he was describing the things that Al Qaeda claimed as reasons for the attack. But I don’t think that means he thinks the attacks were justified. I don’t see leaning more toward isolationism as necessarily a bad thing. I tend to favor very conservative use of our military, but I understand that people disagree on that.
  
  Report this comment
- soybomb315_II
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 7:56pm
  it must be Time2
  
  Report this comment
- LEFTIST_CLOWNS_AND_FAR_RIGHT_JOKERS
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 8:06pm
  IMPERATIVE.
  
  I get you (don’t necessarily agree like some might not as you stated) but I get you and your opinion.
  
  Report this comment
- imperative
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 8:16pm
  @LEFTIST_CLOWNS…
  
  Glad to hear it, my friend. Best of luck. :-)
  
  Report this comment
- LEFTIST_CLOWNS_AND_FAR_RIGHT_JOKERS
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 8:46pm
  IMPERATIVE. Back at you. ;-)
  
  Report this comment
GotMullet
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:23pm
Just think of how many Paulbot’s there are. I kinda agree with the statement that this is around the STFU point in Ron Paul’s career.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- DRSAVAGE24
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 9:38pm
  Looks like Beck will have something to get sanctimonious about on tomorrow’s show.
  
  Report this comment
- soybomb315_II
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:27pm
  cant wait for Beck’s saul alinsky smackdown on his radio show tomorrow. And Glenn will surely rhetorically ask why anyone cares about ron paul…..
  
  Report this comment
AmericaMustBeFree
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:21pm
Ron Paul isn’t who he pretends to be I am afraid! He has some very good idea’s.. but then blows them all when he makes such statements. His son seems to be a little better.. but you know what they say.. the nut doesn’t fall far from the tree. So I wouldn’t really trust either of them! I keep getting these emails where Rand Paul needs money to fight some bill.. how hard is it to just do your job.. or any of their jobs without their hands out wanting money, did we or did we not vote for these people to work hard.. why does it take our hard earned money to fight a bill! With Washington.. its always about money. And personally I am sick of it!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
BODYBAG
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:21pm
Ron Paul bots unite!!!!!!
This was complete stupidity.
LMAO.

TEACHABLE MOMENT:
Have the wisdom to know when to keep your cake hole closed.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Plan B
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:20pm
Wow, just wow!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
DougHuffman
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:20pm
Libertarians and republicans are progressives and gun-grabbers just like democraps and Obama Lord of Lies.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- ABO
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:22pm
  So what’s left????
  
  Report this comment
- BODYBAG
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:25pm
  Need meds?
  
  Report this comment
- encinom
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:32pm
  Poor Doughuffman, off his meds again. Another senile gun nut tha wonders what gun Jesus would buy.
  
  Report this comment
- progressiveslayer
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:42pm
  Doug you’re old enough to know………… I guess not.
  
  Report this comment
- AxelPhantom
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:03pm
  I have generally come to realize that I am not a strict libertarian or a Republican or a Democrat…. I am “me” just me.
  
  Why don’t we siphon off the “all about me vote” and start the “Just Me” party?
  
  Since it has been proven that voters don’t think and just go for catchy names, phrases and slogans, it should be a smashing success.
  
  The platform would simply be that none of the existing parties represents “me”. Our appeal would come from the fact before each vote via our spokesperson, our registered individual members (no corporations or groups) would have an opportunity to vote for or against a bill via internet and our representative would be bound by the results.
  
  Our slogan could “Yes, it really is all about ‘Just Me’” [sarc off]
  
  Report this comment
- justangry
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:25pm
  You are an intriguing character, DougHuffman. Often I applaud some of the things you say. Other times, I think assisted living my be in your best interest.
  
  Report this comment
- RaydocX
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:45pm
  Moncine,
  Jesus would sympathize with the AR platform, hated for being a black gun, for looking evil without having done anything wrong.
  
  but he wouldn’t need the extended mag, because his 10 round would never run dry.
  
  Report this comment
- DougHuffman
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:46pm
  @JustAngry, thank you for your well considered reply/comment. About progressivism, I take my lesson from Hillsdale College’s free on-line Constitution 101, IIRC lecture 4, in which our Founding Fathers’ differences with progressivism/libertarianism are made clear. Further, that is consistent with the context of my readings. My underclass curriculum was an honors Great Books University Program, so I regard my political philosophy foundation as sound.
  
  Report this comment
- DLV
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:49pm
  Yeah honestly doug libertarians and progressives are on the opposite ends of the spectrum to say they are the same is just foolish. Read up please. How in the world does Paul’s comment make him a progressive. I kind of agree with Justangry here. I do think however, Paul should have phrased it better. Kyle was an American hero.
  
  Report this comment
- soybomb315_II
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:37pm
  libertarian and conservative are meaningless terms
  
  when it comes to our laws, you are either a progressive or a constitutionalist…..or somewhere in between
  
  when it comes to government, you are either for no government control or all government control…..or somewhere in between
  
  Report this comment
grimjack3791
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:18pm
I didn’t know Mr. Paul was an expert on PTSD.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- 3monkeysmomma
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:44pm
  Well he’s served his country as a military war-time doctor so I’m sure he know a hell of a lot more than you do Grim.
  
  Report this comment
- soybomb315_II
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:35pm
  Do you think adam lorenza’s mother made a mistake by having guns in the house?
  
  Do you think adam lorenza’s mom put more weight on the idea of having a gun in the house versus the fact that a crazy kid lives there?
  
  I’m not saying Chris Kyle did the same thing, but he should have been more careful with who he was mentoring. With that said, Ron Paul should have been more careful with his words (if it was him who wrote it)
  
  Report this comment
Fubared
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:18pm
Seems like he has been listening to bots for too long. And it just showed. So we can expect the good doc to expire with his legs in a Y and feet in the stirrups? Makes sense.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
searching for the Truth
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:17pm
Well, Ron, if you are referring to the Apostle Peter, then maybe you are correct – Peter was crucified upside down though.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
SCREW-WINDOWS
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:17pm
Simply Unamerican !!!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Jenny Lind
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:16pm
Sometimes politicians are just grade A jerks, although I did think McCains remark was funny. Ron Paul is starting to sound a lot like his silly father-apple falling etc.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- HollyRye
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:18pm
  I agree with you about both!
  
  Report this comment
- Glenn_S
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:21pm
  Jenny -
  The APLLE TREE made the tweet, not the APPLE.
  
  Report this comment
- The_Jerk
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:21pm
  Jenny, Ron is the father in the apple-thing. And, what’s wrong with a grade A Jerk?
  
  Report this comment
- ABO
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:22pm
  Ron Paul NOT RAND PAUL…god the ignorance of the American people is astounding
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:40pm
  Grade A jerks are decent and kosher, Jihad Jerks are nazis. Next.
  
  Report this comment
- The_Jerk
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:24pm
  Fubared, through kosher colored glasses.
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:42pm
  Better that than halal and nazi ass cheeks.
  
  Report this comment
- sillyfreshness
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 9:19pm
  Foolburped is a Zionist shill.
  
  Report this comment
SquidVetOhio
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:15pm
Raise your hand if your surprised.

No one…? That’s what I thought.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- SCREW-WINDOWS
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:18pm
  What is to be expected from a pacifist ?
  
  Report this comment
- KidCharlemagne
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:19pm
  SCREW-WINDOWS
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:18pm
  
  What is to be expected from a pacifist ?
  ================================
  
  Christianity perhaps?:
  
  (“Peace on Earth and Good Will Toward All Men”)
  
  Report this comment
- LEFTIST_CLOWNS_AND_FAR_RIGHT_JOKERS
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:51pm
  “…expected from a pacifist ?
  
  Pacifist isolationist.
  
  Report this comment
- soybomb315_II
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:46pm
  may God bless us with a few more pacifists in washington to balance out all the warmongers
  
  Report this comment
- SCREW-WINDOWS
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 6:28pm
  Being a pacifist does not keep you safe at night.
  
  Report this comment
- imperative
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 7:13pm
  @SCREW-WINDOWS
  
  I don’t think Ron Paul is a pacifist in any sort of absolute sense. I mean he doesn’t seem anti-military or anything like that as far as I can tell. I just don’t think he likes the liberal use of a military, and I’d tend to agree with that.
  
  Report this comment
- FOREIGNANDDOMESTIC
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 7:44pm
  Like Hussein, RP is jealous of our SEALs. Blame it on his shrunken balls.
  
  Let me be clear: RP is an Islamist sympathizer. Anyone who sides with Islam is as Republican as Hussein. The walking fossil needs to get off the Republican teat before he croaks. Then maybe he can die an honest man.
  
  @SOY
  And when it comes to patriotism, you are either for America or against it. It’s black or white, as Jesus wisely noted.
  
  RP and his sheeple (you included) think America is an evil, warmongering nation. Therefore, you view an American hero as a villain. Why is anyone surprised?
  
  Report this comment
- soybomb315_II
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 7:59pm
  @FOREIGNANDDOMESTIC
  “And when it comes to patriotism, you are either for America or against it. It’s black or white, as Jesus wisely noted.
  
  RP and his sheeple (you included) think America is an evil, warmongering nation. Therefore, you view an American hero as a villain. Why is anyone surprised?”
  ___________________________
  
  You mischaracterize my opinion of America. I see America doing good and bad. But obviously, you see America as an absolute force of good – which is very dangerous and leads to things like tyranny, genocide, one world government, etc. You are exactly what the founders warned about
  
  Report this comment
- imperative
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 8:09pm
  @FOREIGN…
  
  Would you characterize your post as representative of the general position and sentiment of today’s Republican party?
  
  To be entirely honest, based on that post, you come across as very angry and bitter. It’s the sort of rhetoric that I’ve always associated with the far left, but more and more it seems to come from Republicans.
  
  I’ve voted for Republicans my entire life. Never any other party. But it’s difficult for me to allow myself to be associated with that type of behavior.
  
  Report this comment
- DLV
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 10:21pm
  foreign- Get a grip, Paul isn’t a Islamic sympathizer. As far as I know he doesn’t like our military being overseas and is quite conservative on use of it. I agree with him on that but I believe he is wrong on certain foreign policy issues.
  
  Report this comment
HollyRye
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:15pm
What a disappointment. I expect better from him.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
shogun459
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:14pm
This is why Mr. Paul will never be President. He has bad judgement and speaks without knowledge.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- BODYBAG
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:22pm
  Sounds a little like Westbrook Baptist Church’s Rev Fred Phelps?
  
  Report this comment
- LEFTIST_CLOWNS_AND_FAR_RIGHT_JOKERS
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:42pm
  Ron Paul never wanted to be President. He knew he would be way in over his head. He could never deal with the tough decisions needed at the executive level and he knew that deep down. He was a good ****** doctor first and foremost. That’s what he was best at and should have remained in medicine like Howard Dean should have.
  
  He knew his limitations and sabotaged his own campaigns time and time again with precision idiocy. What a waste of time and money for his supporters. But his supporters will tell you it was “the message” that was most important. Yes that’s it. “The message.” Yeah right.
  
  It seems he may not be able to manage at Twitter account just as he was unable to manage a newsletter. Manage a country? Laughable.
  
  Report this comment
- jcizarter
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 7:22am
  The Reason Ron Paul will never be president is that God did not want him to be president up to the present time.
  
  Report this comment
firman
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:13pm
What a dumbass comment! The Biblical meaning of that phrase is meant to imply that those who seek violence to solve everything SOLELY will eventually succomb by the same means. Fighting for one’s country to protect innocent lives is not the same thing. We have an obligation to defend ourselves and others from evil.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- SCREW-WINDOWS
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:21pm
  Sort of like unions eating their own.
  
  Report this comment
- civilwarcometh
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:22pm
  WOOT!http://weaselzippers.us/2013/02/04/monday-afternoon-war-porn-43/
  
  Report this comment
- AUsername
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:51pm
  actually it is when USA seeks violence as every way to solve a problem. our last war of defense was world war 2.
  
  Report this comment
- soybomb315_II
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:46pm
  fubared – i dont know how you can stand that picture you have…..
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:59pm
  Tofu
  It was an inside feasibility survey. It took you a week to cry about it. Now I know.
  
  Report this comment
- soybomb315_II
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 6:04pm
  i was able to look past it, but when you are talking about ‘ass kicking” with that face next to it……
  
  too much man
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 7:34pm
  It’s cool. When I see Tofu/Soy I correlate it with a proctologist with 10 thumbs and few teeth.
  
  Report this comment
- soybomb315_II
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 7:53pm
  whatever gets you off i guess
  
  Report this comment
- SeanW
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 10:50pm
  Actually every single thing you stated is a complete and utter fabrication and distortion of the word of God and His Son Jesus. Turn the other cheek ring a bell?
  
  Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword (Matthew 26:52, King James Version)
  
  He doesn’t equivocate, He doesn’t play your asterisk games. ALL is what He said, it is not for you to change His words to suit your meaning.
  
  Report this comment
- firman
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 9:06am
  Sean- Are you really that ignorant? You think we’re supposed to take everything Jesus said literally? He spoke in parables on purpose. I suppose you think he literally wants us to maim ourselves too?
  
  Report this comment

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.