Watch Live: Congressional Hearing on IRS Scandal

Live Now on TheBlaze Radio: ‘The Buck Sexton Show’

We Take You Inside the Mind of a Sandy Hook Truther: CIA Conspiracy? 7 Shooters? An Attempt to ‘Disarm People and Attack the 2nd Amendment’?

Feb. 4, 2013 3:16pm Billy Hallowell

The fever-pitch surrounding Sandy Hook Trutherism is simmering, however a small, yet vocal movement is still feverishly working to convince the greater society that the event either didn’t happen — or that key details are being hidden from the public. We already brought you a point-by-point debunk of the Sandy Hook conspiracy, tackling some of the most talked-about claims. But TheBlaze article was published on Jan. 23, and, since that time, Truthers have come out with new ideas and theories aimed at poking holes in the official narrative.

Among the more recent projects is “Sandy Hook — The Documentary,” a nearly-three hour YouTube movie produced by 31-year-old Mark Howitt, a Canadian who has a deep interest in studying the facets surrounding events like the Sandy Hook massacre. TheBlaze interviewed Howitt late last week to learn more about his motivations for creating the film and to better understand the Truthers’ curious stance.

HOW “SANDY HOOK — THE DOCUMENTARY” CAME TO FRUITION

Howitt, who runs a record label called Archaic North Entertainment, describes himself as a regular guy whose curiosities were sparked by inconsistencies he found in the official Sandy Hook story.

“Well, obviously the anomalies that were being reported by the media was what sparked my initial curiosity,” he told TheBlaze.

The novice filmmaker said that he didn’t start exploring the shooting until two or three weeks after it happened. By the time he began investigating, Howitt said the media had already settled comfortably into embracing the police narrative.

He claims that the points raised by Sandy Hook Truthers are the result of legitimate confusion over events and police accounts that simply don’t make sense. Plus, he noted that human nature causes people to have a thirst for quenching curiosities, especially when events seem confusing or unbelievable.

“I’m sure we all love a good murder mystery. We’re all into trying to figure out what’s going on,” Howitt said. “That’s why people are looking into this. There’s a lot of evidence there and confusion…[it's] cloudy and muddy.”

Many of those questioning the event take issue with being called “Truthers” and conspiracy theorists, so they remain anonymous. But Howitt, who has no qualms about attaching his name to the movement, is entirely open about his identity. In describing Truthers, he told TheBlaze that while those casting doubt on the official Sandy Hook story are all clumped under a monolithic category, there is actually a fair bit of divisiveness among the cohort.

“There is a division that is amongst us, where there is some people who believe that people actually died and another portion that believe that there were all actors,” he said of the victims and their families.

Mark Howitt Tells TheBlaze His Theories About Sandy Hook Shooting | Conspiracy Theory, Truther

A man holds a sign at a gun rights rally at the Capitol in Hartford, Conn., Saturday, Jan. 19, 2013. The rally, dubbed, “Guns Across America”, at Connecticut’s state Capitol and state capitol buildings across the country to raise concerns about possible new gun legislation that could affect gun owners’ rights in the wake of the Dec. 14 school shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown. Credit: AP

Howitt himself hasn’t always had the same stance. While he told TheBlaze that he initially embraced the crisis actor theory (read more about this in our initial analysis), he has since moderated his position. While he claims to have encountered “anomalies” while investigating the history of Newtown, Conn., and the businesses within, he now believes that the event happened (i.e. this isn’t a made-up situation involving actors), but that key details are being hidden from the public.

“The reason I believe [people died] — the main reason is because of the scale of how many people were involved,” Howitt said. “Sandy Hook has been a school for a while. It’s not like they built the school and said, ‘Everyone’s going to play their part.’”

The documentarian said that the crisis actor situation, given everything that is now known about the event, no longer makes sense.

“I’ve heard enough witness testimonies to lead me to believe that this actually did happen,” he told TheBlaze.

THE SHOOTING’S ALLEGED INCONSISTENCIES

But while Howitt believes that the tragedy unfolded, there are some key elements he believes authorities may be hiding — and he thinks the government might be involved in the planned killing spree.

“There’s a lot of evidence supporting that there was a group of people involved — that Adam Lanza was not the only one involved in the operation, if at all,” he said. “It’s impossible to debunk this evidence. On the police scanner you can hear seven suspects discussed – including Adam Lanza.”

Here, it’s important to note that Howitt explicitly used the word “operation” to describe the shooting, a term reserved for planned events and occurrences. As far as the suspects go, the filmmaker clearly believes that many others aside from the lone gunman were involved in the plot.

He called the overall collection of information known thus far “very confusing,” noting that there is “speculative” evidence that makes one “question whether those involved are genuine or not.” His doubts are rooted in his accusation that police didn’t release enough information about other individuals who were arrested and then released in the hours immediately following the shooting.

“That’s where you will find the account of what happened…when you see the order of events happening and then you hear all the suspects being detained and the identity of these suspects [was] never released,” Howitt charged.

A women fires a handgun at the ‘Get Some Guns & Ammo’ shooting range on January 15, 2013 in Salt Lake City, Utah. Lawmakers are calling for tougher gun legislation after recent mass shootings at an Aurora, Colorado movie theater and at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. Credit: Getty Images

As for Lanza, the lone gunman, Howitt has his doubts about both his background and physical ability to carry out such a massive assault. He told TheBlaze that Lanza certainly existed, but that there are sparse records of the young man’s activities over the past few years. Howitt also wondered what Lanza has been doing for the past three years and expressed a desire to know more about the shooter’s life preceding the event.

The conspiracy theorist also mentioned the guns used in the shooting — a common target of Truthers’ angst. Based on police audio, Howitt claimed that a shotgun was found in the school (police have since debunked the claim that the shotgun was brought into Sandy Hook Elementary). The filmmaker also said that authorities on the recordings do not mention handguns being inside the building — something that he believes is inconsistent with the story given by authorities.

Furthermore, Howitt questioned how Lanza would be able to carry all of the weapons and ammo on his own, again attempting to corroborate the notion that multiple shooters might have been involved.

“How could one 20-year-old, 120-pound skinny kid walk in with all that ammo plus all the clips and the bullets that would be needed?,” he asked, calling this idea “physically impossible.”

A GOVERNMENT CONSPIRACY TO ERODE THE SECOND AMENDMENT?

Of course, most Sandy Hook Truthers — and Howitt is no exception — root their theories in the notion that the government either manufactured the massacre or embellished the events in an effort to disarm Americans and to erode the Second Amendment.

The documentarian mentioned an overwhelming lack of trust in the U.S. government as being another catalyst for conspiracy theories surrounding Sandy Hook. Last week, TheBlaze reported about the public’s shocking rise in distrust for the federal government. With the rise of skepticism comes increased individual research, Howitt said.

“We’re definitely not being told the whole story and I believe that agents of the government — and maybe the president doesn’t know they exist, maybe they are that covert — maybe certain members of the CIA were involved in this,” he told TheBlaze, adding that these theories are merely conjecture. “I have no evidence of this.”

Howitt continued, saying that historical examples show that the president isn’t always aware of “covert operations” that are underway. In the case of Sandy Hook, he believes that it is entirely possible that the goal is to disarm the American public.

Parents of Sandy Hook Elementary massacre victims hold hands during a press conference on the one month anniversary of the Newtown elementary school massacre on January 14, 2013 in Newtown, Connecticut. Eleven families of Sandy Hook massacre victims came to the event one month after the shooting to give their support to Sandy Hook Promise, a new non-profit with the goal of preventing such tragedies in the future. Credit: Getty Images

“Because of the guns planted in the school — the shotgun in the school among other anomalies – that this whole thing was to try to disarm people and attack the Second Amendment,” he said. “It seems like — it’s hard to explain really, because there is so much conflicting information out there.”

The filmmaker went on compare Lanza to Lee Harvey Oswald, President John F. Kennedy’s assassin, raising the idea that Lanza might have been a CIA agent or operative.

“If people showed us the video footage, we wouldn’t be questioning these stories,” he added, referring to surveillance footage from inside the school that would corroborate authorities’ claims that Lanza was a lone wolf.

The filmmaker said that he believes fervently in gun rights, despite being a Canadian and claimed that he currently enjoys the same freedom as Americans to protect his family. Howitt affirmed the importance of America’s Second Amendment and seemed diligent about protecting its tenets.

HOW THE FILMMAKER RESPONDS TO CRITICS

When asked how he responds to the multitudes of Americans who think that Truthers are wrong-headed (or crazy) in their assertion that Sandy Hook is at least, in part, a government cover-up, Howitt seemed surprised by the question. In fact, he told TheBlaze that he believes the “majority of the people don’t believe the official story.”

“I don’t see a lot of people saying that these theories are crazy — I see the opposite actually,” he said. “I see people saying, ‘This is not right.’ I’m not talking about just America. I’m talking about the world.”

As for the government, if, indeed, officials are covering up the shooting, Howitt claims that they will do whatever is needed to keep it under wraps. The future, he contended, could be bleak (although he didn’t go into greater detail about what, exactly, he meant).

“I feel there are big problems ahead — bigger problems then just Sandy Hook,” he said.

A memorial is displayed in a yard near the Sandy Hook Elementary School on the one-month anniversary of the mass shooting that left 26 dead, including 20 children in Newtown, Conn., Monday, Jan. 14, 2013. Credit: AP

But outsiders who dismiss Truthers aren’t Howitt’s only ideological foes. He also faces critics from within the conspiracy theory movement, specifically those who embrace the crisis actor scenario. Because the filmmaker believes that the event actually unfolded, those who reject it as a government-manufactured stage-play view Howitt as an outsider. He said that these individuals have, thus far, dismissed his views and attacked his theories.

HOWITT’S VIEWS ON 9/11 — AND SOME SANDY HOOK FLIP-FLOPS

It’s not a stretch to say that a connection has been made between those who reject the 9/11 attacks as a government conspiracy and those who cast doubt on the official narrative surrounding Sandy Hook. When asked to share his views on 9/11, Howitt said that he believes the terror attack happened — but that he can’t be sure about the perpetrator.

“I was shocked and I was like…’I can’t believe this happened,’ and that’s when…I started realizing that things weren’t adding up sometimes when it came to government and the media,” he said. “I can’t really say 100 percent with all assuredly that I believe it was done by al Qaeda or anything like that. Bin Laden was also tied with the CIA [and] that got me looking into things more.”

Like Sandy Hook, 9/11 still offers up many anomalies to be considered, he says. Perhaps realizing that his Trutherism was beginning to paint a pattern, Howitt cautioned that he doesn’t believe that every event is mired with hidden secrets.

Despite holding views and asking questions that many would dismiss, Howitt also appeared open to changing his stances — and even backtracked on some of the content that he presented in his nearly three-hour documentary. While he initially casted doubt on Sally Cox, the nurse at the school (see our original report to see the claims that Truthers waged against Cox), he now believes that reported inconsistencies surrounding the nurse’s story were the result of media exaggeration and not purposeful lies.

Heavily armed Connecticut State troopers are on the scene at the Sandy Hook School following a shooting at the school, Friday, Dec. 14, 2012 in Newtown, Conn. A man opened fire inside the Connecticut elementary school where his mother worked Friday, killing 26 people, including 18 children, and forcing students to cower in classrooms and then flee with the help of teachers and police. (AP Photo/The Journal News, Frank Becerra Jr.) MANDATORY CREDIT, NYC OUT, NO SALES, TV OUT, NEWSDAY OUT; MAGS OUT Photo: Frank Becerra Jr., AP

He also addressed claims that Dr. H. Wayne Carver II, the chief medical examiner who handled the Sandy Hook case, is a crisis actor.

“I’ve heard claims that Dr. Carver is an actor and that’s ridiculous,” he said. “He’s been the state examiner for quite some time.”

Howitt also said that there are other elements of Truthers’ claims that can be explained. Among them: The charge that fundraiser pages for victims were created before the shooting took place (we also debunked this here). He said that some of the explanations posited by web experts (that Google doesn’t always archive dates correctly, that some of the pages were created for other purposes and changed to be for the victims and other similar theories) are built on solid ground.

In a future version of the film, Howitt said he may shorten the documentary down and remove some of the theories and questions that have already been debunked. Highlighting that he is “very logical” when it comes to exploring events like Sandy Hook, he’s open to admitting he’s wrong, calling his film endeavor “investigative journalism” that is meant to raise important questions.

“If someone shows me something that proves I’m wrong, maybe I’m wrong,” he explained.

You can watch his film below:

–

Related:

This Is TheBlaze’s Point-by-Point Sandy Hook Conspiracy Theory Debunk

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (132)

grimjack3791
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:58pm
At least the Archaic North website was interesting. Underground metal always wins.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
41mag
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:31pm
what ever happen at sandy hook happen.Now the point is how to stop this madness on gun control.You people need to understand they fight us with words not guns or bullets. The pen is mightier than the sword. You need to get out of the gun store stop buying up all the guns and ammo. Stop thinking your rambo and call/email your senator and use the PEN on them. Because in the end you will give up your guns just like did in new orleans.you have to fight but fight smart.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- GroundZero is Nuclear Demolition x3
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:51pm
  “what ever happen at sandy hook happen(ed)” Really, well please present an interview of a teacher that was on the scene, b/c I have yet to see ANY 1st hand account. Yes, there are plenty of second responders making claims but nothing to back the story.
  
  “The first casualty of war is the truth”-IDK
  
  Report this comment
- sillyfreshness
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:55pm
  The Blaze is now part of this SANDY HOAX conspiracy.
  
  Remember when Beck used to say “question with boldness”?
  
  Now Beck says “question the questioner”
  
  It’s a tactic taken right out of Lenin/Stalin and it works. That’s why they use it, because that tactic works.
  
  Now you label anyone who “questions with boldness” a TRUTHER or some other kind of stigma label like UFO believer to make you sound crazy and not to be taken seriously.
  
  Do you remember back from the 1970s to 1990s calling anyone who thought JFK was killed by a 2nd gunman as a “JFK’er” or a “Grassyknowler” or an “Oswalder”? Nowadays you will be called that. It’s just a way to stifle open thought and free discussion.
  
  You can bet “chosen people” in the media are behind this new witch hunt to stop any criticism on the SANDY HOAX shooting.
  
  Report this comment
- pa346
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:22pm
  Haha. You go ahead and write your communist elected rep. Doesnt seem to matter anymore. And I’m sure YOU will give up your guns jus like they did in NO.
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 7:56pm
  Now it is just “SillySally-er”. What a whack job. Oh, he is SillySally-er without doubt. If you look closely at Beck’s lil toe on his left foot he has the star of David ring on it. Cereal. While we are ruminating on whack jobs, why are there so many bots that are nazi’s? There may be some nefarious happenings in SillySallySandyHook from the media and LE. But the last person I would look to for insight on anything is a known nazi. Just saying. Something squirrely? Sure. Listen to a damn thing a nazi says? No thanks.
  
  Report this comment
- Unconquerablesoul
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 11:30am
  SillyFreshness is on it. I agree that we have a natural inclination to sift through the B.S. the media spins and to seek the truth for our selves. With regard to FUBARED’s reply, is he a Nazi because he wants lower taxes and limited gov? Or is he a Nazi for another reason?
  
  Report this comment
CulperGang
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:04pm
I would prefer if you would take us into the mind of Evelyn Rothchild/David Rockerfeller/the Bushes/Bresinksi…….Barry..THEY are the spawns of “theories.” Reuters IS OWNED by the Rottenchilds, so obviously you don’t get “truthfull information” on anything.
Hey, Blaze GO and interview the spawners of conspiracies and get the truth out of them. While your at it get Barrys real verified birthcert. There IS A REASON these people operate in secrecy. Why the HUSH, HUSH of the Bilderberger meetings. ans: LIBOR.
AlexJ got in the face of Dubya and asked him DIRECTLY about the FedRes secrecy and CFR……..HE DIDN’T GET AN ANSWER. He got jackbooted out of the room. THAT IS WHAT SPAWNS ‘conspiracies.’

print the truth and reality Blaze, stop tangoing around it.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- VanceUppercut
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:40pm
  Stuart Mackenzie: Well, it’s a well known fact, Sonny Jim, that there’s a secret society of the five wealthiest people in the world, known as The Pentavirate, who run everything in the world, including the newspapers, and meet tri-annually at a secret country mansion in Colorado, known as The Meadows.
  Tony Giardino: So who’s in this Pentavirate?
  Stuart Mackenzie: The Queen, The Vatican, The Gettys, The Rothschilds…and Colonel Sanders before he went **** up. Oh, I hated the Colonel with is wee beady eyes, and that smug look on his face. “Oh, you’re gonna buy my chicken! Ohhhhh!”
  Charlie Mackenzie: Dad, how can you hate the Colonel?
  Stuart Mackenzie: Because he puts an addictive chemical in his chicken that makes ya crave it fortnightly, smartass!
  
  Report this comment
- CulperGang
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:01pm
  Vanceuppercut that “quote” is from the film 1993 “so I married an axe murderer” AND YOUR POINT IS??? deflection with gibberish.
  
  print the truth Blaze. oh ,wait you can’t can you.
  
  Report this comment
- VanceUppercut
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:04pm
  @CulperGang
  
  I guess I was trying to point out the fact that if someone were to take your ravings, and put them alongside the intentionally ridiculous ravings of an old coot in a comedy, most people wouldn’t be able to tell the difference.
  
  Report this comment
- ConstitunalAmerican
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 7:41pm
  Pres. Obama is reported to have been born in Hawaii. Names of parents, DOB, hospital, and gender is listed under the hospital’s name, at the time of birth, in the local newspaper released by the hospital.
  In the Pres’s case, there was only a birth announcement, sent to the newspapers a couple days later, written by his grandmother, which is odd and not the norm.
  Usually that happens to notify others, by the family, of any out-of-town/state/country births. So why was he not listed with the other babies under Hospital/ Births in Hawaii?
  
  Report this comment
- mamatango
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:40am
  And before all this debunking facts are debated, I’d like to interject one truth, that some, including Glenn may not realize. Using Snopes to debunk anything is not like having a hotline to God when seeking truth. Few realize that Snopes is run simply by a middle-aged couple, Barbara and David Mikkelson in California. And he was quite the weaver of tales in the past, what used to be called a TROLL…Nuff said.
  
  Report this comment
PIGSWILLNEVERFLY
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 12:52pm
THE DICK ACT OF 1902 (Cannot Be Repealed)

Gun Control Forbidden – Protection Against Tyrannical Government

Library of Congress Record: Link: http://lccn.loc.gov/96190993

Also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654

The three classes of H.R. 11654 provides for the organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular army. The militia encompasses EVERY able-bodied male between 18 and 45. ALL members of the unorganized militia have the ABSOLUTE personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of ANY TYPE, and AS MANY AS THEY CAN AFFORD TO BUY.

American Firearms owners: YOUR RIGHTS ARE PERPETUALLY PROTECTED

This is a partial of the e-mail I received as having partnered with http://www.republicfortheunitedstates.org
and forwared in part because of the investigations into this by: Jim Bratten and the Hoosier Patriots

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Something is Wrong
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 5:08pm
  Of course the Dick Act of 1902 can’t be repealed… because it was never actually passed. What WAS passed however, was the National Guard Act of 1903, also known as the Dick Act & it MUST be repealed. It ended militias & created the National Guard. It was a much watered down version of what Roosevelt originally wanted & basically all it did was to officially federally organize the National Guard (Militias had been informally called the National Guard for many years before that) while giving it an official structure that ended all militias. From the foundation of the country, anybody in a community could join the militia & rules of conduct in that militia were decided locally. Also, the command structure was such that the President had NO authority over any militia. He could make a request from state Governors & Governors could call upon militias but militias themselves had their own command structures. The Dick Act in its originally passed form (from 1903, not 1902) while seeming to not do much, changed a lot about our military structure but what it also did was to open the door for more abuse & power grabbing later on as amendments were added to the bill making it so that the President could call upon any unit for any reason or no reason at all any time he wished, making him truly the Commander in Chief of all military force in the US (which he was never meant to be). It destroyed the militia system designed by the founders & set the stage for the death of the 2nd Amendment
  
  Report this comment
landowner
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 12:29pm
I don’t know that any of it is lies or that it really even happened and wasn’t a “drill” just like the drills that happen in cities all over America. What I do know is that I have come to doubt most anything I see on TV or hear from the “news”. I don’t feel I am alone in thinking that it is not beneath these left wing wackos to create something, anything to PROGRESS their agenda.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- sillyfreshness
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 12:51pm
  I think a better name for the Sandy Hook shooting would be the SANDY HOAX shooting.
  
  Report this comment
- sillyfreshness
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 12:53pm
  Glenn Beck is still trying to silence any critics of the Sandy Hoax shooting by still using the term “Truther” even though he used to tell everyone “question with boldness” but now he sold out to the JWO. Calling someone a Truther is just a stigma name like Birther or Bigfoot Believer.
  
  It’s a way to question the questioner and thus silence any free thinking or criticism. Just like what communism does.
  
  Report this comment
- merchantsailor
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:12pm
  @LANDOWNER
  
  LAND just think what happened August 31, 1939 along the border of Germany and Poland. Murder of political prisoners by the Nazis to jump off the war against Poland and its subjugation. We all know haw that played towards an agenda. I believe Sandy Hook happened but……….
  
  Report this comment
- imperative
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:08pm
  @SILLYFRESHNESS
  
  With respect to the use of the term “Truthers”, Beck does disservice to his own position. If all the questions can be successfully “debunked” (how does one “debunk” a “question” again?), then there would be no need for labels of derision that he constantly uses.
  
  I would love to have answers to all the questions. Some reasonable explanations are being obtained, thanks to those who care to research these issues. There are other legitimate questions that remain.
  
  Report this comment
- duhwut
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:38pm
  @MERCHANSAILOR
  
  The Nazis invaded Poland because there were tens of thousands of German natives being slaughtered throughout the country under Jewish rule. That is also why Hitler hated communist Russia so much. It was controlled by these Jews that destroyed the Russian society and Hitler saw that as a threat to his people and the rest of Europe (as did everyone else at that time).
  But Hitler was an enemy to the other western countries because they were under ZIONIST control and were fearful of Hitler’s power spreading throughout the world.
  
  So when Germany AND Russia invaded Poland Britain declared war ONLY on Germany )because of the protection pact) and not Russia because Russia was already controlled by the Jews.
  
  I dare anyone to try to dispute these facts.
  
  Also: It was ILLEGAL to publicly criticize the OFFICIAL Holocaust story across Europe. People went to jail for years because of that law. So what are they hiding? (You can look all of this up. I dare you to.)
  FACT: Hitler helped create the state of Israel and would have completed a peaceful transfer of all Jews and their assets from Germany to Palestine had Britain NOT declared war on them.
  
  THE TRUTH FEARS NO INVESTIGATION.
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 9:45pm
  Duhwut
  Uh, that had nothing to do with the nat soc party/nazis wanting to retake parts-east prussia back from poland after it was ceded in the treaty of Versailles? That area, the polish corridor, was whacking germans, and that in essence is your mean Jew theory? Poles fearing for their own independence, not wanting to be a satellite of the reich, and whacking Germans then, was bad how? The Poles and Jews were sold down the river by Chamberlain. If only they had whacked more.
  
  Report this comment
- Fla.Patriot
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 3:40am
  Sandy Hook happened. That being said, all that means is that “something” happened in Sandy Hook. My heart goes out to the families of the children, however that in no way effects my suspicion that we got a version of what happened that is so far off the truth that to think that there wasn’t serious misdirection going on. I’m pretty good at spotting a pattern, and since the begining of Obama’s tenure as Destroyer in Chief, there is a pattern of events that should be ovious to anyone who has a mind of their own. Does anyone here believe that Fast and Furious wasn’t a ploy to go after the 2nd Ammendment? Were actors used at Sandy Hook? I think not. I don’t think Obama would have any problem sacrificing those children to advance his agenda. So, in summation, I don’t think that anyone who is “eyes wide open” can possibly view Sandy Hook, Colorado, and a host of other events as being in any way “spontaneous”
  
  Report this comment
am123
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 12:21pm
It was reported that there was 4-6 minutes of shooting and Lanza shot hundreds of rounds and had hundreds of rounds left over. So say the time of shooting was 5 minutes. If it was only 100 shots fired (low estimate), that would be an average of 1 shot every 3 seconds for 5 minutes straight. And he killed 26 people, shooting them multiple times, and he wounded only 2—or least that was reported, we don’t even know who. And this was all done not by Rambo, but supposedly by a 120 pound nerdy kid wearing a heavy bullet proof vest, carrying multiple weapons, and many pounds of bullets.

Yet, the national media questions nothing of the official narrative.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- DoseofReality
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:38pm
  He was shooting 6 year old your *sshole – thats why
  
  Report this comment
- imperative
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:36pm
  @DOSE
  
  It seems unusual for there to be a nearly 1:1 ratio of hits to fatailities when that many rounds are fired by an amateur. Not impossible, and you would seem right to imply that a child would more likely die from a direct hit, but at the same time, one would expect multiple injuries as well.
  
  Certainly not drawing any conclusions from it, but it’s at least worth pointing out how odd that seems.
  
  Report this comment
- American Soldier (Separated)
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:19pm
  Were all 20 of the 6 year olds strapped down? I find it hard to believe, in the chaos of a mass shooting, that this 120lb nerd was this accurate. Aurora Shooting had 12 people killed and 58 injured!
  
  Yet this guy managed to basically kill everyone and not just wound anyone?
  
  If he were Rambo, maybe, but he was far from “Rambo”.
  
  That’s my biggest question in this whole thing. This is what makes me think he wasn’t a lone wolf shooter.
  
  Report this comment
- LivingInGodsGrace
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:33pm
  Good point… apparently everyone stood there while he shot them… multiple times… “tis a puzzlement”
  
  Report this comment
- am123
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:37pm
  @DOSEOFREALITY,
  Maybe should you think first before shooting your mouth off. The fact that they were 6 year olds makes them even smaller targets and makes the degree of efficiency even more improbable. Here is what Mike Powers, US Naval Law Enforcement and US Army Infantry veteran, said:
  
  “…how could this individual walk into an enclosed space, with an un-suppressed carbine and fire, again to Connecticut State Police LT. Paul Vance, 100 of rounds. He fired hundreds of rounds in the school, and was still carrying on his person hundreds more that he had not discharged. Essentially you are talking about 165 decibel or better percussive impact on the human nervous system, inside of an enclosed space like that. That’s simply just not possible. I had actually 2 phone interviews with Doctors from Otolaryngology yesterday, and this is the level we take our investigation to. I’m not going to asses it on my own personal information, or my own personal level of training. I’m going to take this to industry professionals who have PhD’s in these matters to make sure that my information is correct, and both of those Doctors in Otolaryngology have indicated that the impact on the Eustachian tube of the inner ear would be devastating under those conditions. The individual would lose balance, cognitive ability, just from the shock of the incident”
  
  http://www.insanemedia.net/mike-powers-sandy-hook-interview-investigation-sandy-hook-conspiracy/720
  
  Yet Lanza supposedly shot
  
  Report this comment
- Fla.Patriot
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 4:21am
  Good and valid points. Kudos
  
  Report this comment
Supah_Patriot
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 12:18pm
The Blaze: Giving a voice to and implying credibility of nutty conspiracy theorists since 2012!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- GroundZero is Nuclear Demolition x3
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 12:26pm
  WOW, an acct that is more than ten days established.
  
  TROLL’N TROLL’N TROLL’N, KEEP THEM ******** TROLL’N
  
  Report this comment
- comforteagle
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 12:33pm
  So true… seems like there is not a story on this site that isn’t ravaged by conspiracy nuts that cant accept the simple fact that sensless violence happens, or that the government isn’t involved in everything. and then beck fans wonder why they dont get taken seriously
  
  Report this comment
- Supah_Patriot
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 12:35pm
  Greetings, Truther!
  
  Report this comment
- GroundZero is Nuclear Demolition x3
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:09pm
  Take a look at this, a 15day old acct responding to an 11day old acct. What are the odds.
  
  And NO, I am not a “truther”;. “Truthers” try to keep people brainwashed to continue believing commercial airliners hit the towers, like Alex Jones or Jess Ventura.
  Basically YOU believe the same thing Alex Jones promotes, yet people who actually do research like what REALLY happens when an aircraft strikes a skyscraper, know why it PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for hollow aluminum to penetrate structural steel at 500fps.
  
  Keep pushing your lie little boy.
  
  Report this comment
- RaydocX
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:45pm
  @SP,
  did you bother reading the article before you started throwing metaphorical firebombs…
  
  the article is NOT suggesting the reports of a conspiracy are valid, merely reporting its existence.
  
  Your pretending otherwise betrays your bias and disinterest in any real discourse.
  
  it’s ok, we understand the world is a harsh place when nobody agrees with you for very long. some day you’ll come to understand so much of what you believe was wishful thinking with which you were indoctrinated…
  
  Report this comment
dnewton
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 12:15pm
If what happened in Benghazi “does not matter”, why would it matter in Sandy Hook?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- comforteagle
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 12:27pm
  If u follow the logic of what your referencing then u should say… it doesnt matter if the murders were done by 1 or ten people, whether he did it for a god or satan or pleasure; what matters is how to prevent future murders
  
  Report this comment
am123
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 12:13pm
Why did we not hear from the national media about the eerie line “end the life of Adam” on the police scanner recording? Check it out at about the 1:23:54 mark in the video. Should that at least have been brought up by someone in the national media? Why not try and get an explanation for this? When the media doesn’t even bring up things like this, that is what gives rise to valid speculation. Are they hiding something? Perhaps Adam Lanza was a patsy.

Don’t blame so-called truthers for bringing this up, blame the media for not doing their job.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Jloyoyo
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:08pm
  Or when Anderson Cooper interviews the Mother of a Sandy Hook victim in front of a green screen…
  
  CNN has done it before. Remember their news crew coming under “attack” in Saudi Arabia…
  
  Report this comment
- Mil-Dot
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:36pm
  I have long held the theory that he was a patsy. Lure the nut to the school, a couple of NWO goons shoot the kids, put one in crazy guy’s skull, at the right angle, toss down the guns and book. Voila’-instant crisis to attack guns with. Make no mistake. The ulimate goal of all of this is to get rid of those that oppose Obama. He hates snowmen with guns and Christians with guns. And he wants them all. I would not put ANYTHING past the criminals is the US “Govt”.
  
  Report this comment
- whywonder
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:59pm
  Mil- dolt
  So you blame everything wrong on obama? Then you complain bout obama blaming bush. Make your mind up and stop complaining. If you can’t bring yourself to inderstand that 20 kids are dead and a nut job killed them then you are stupid.
  
  Report this comment
b@man
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 12:09pm
Well we know Obama and his hit man Holder are not above murder.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- VanceUppercut
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:51pm
  Well, we know for a fact Laura Bush killed a guy with her guy.
  
  Report this comment
Libertyluvnmomma
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 12:01pm
It’s plausible.
We carry on our lives as if thousands of babies weren’t slaughtered every day. Our branch of government was able to bend the Constitution for abortion and that isn’t all they’ve done.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- pragmaticpatriot
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 4:17pm
  is it plausible that the government will lie just to lie? My point is this, the joplin tornado death count is 161 but stories of a semi reefer full of body parts and the local walmarts have more ‘missing person’ fliers than anywhere ive ever seen. How many illegal immigrants or people that didnt have someone to report them missing lived in joplin ? 1st responders reported that there were hundreds of dead, one reported that they found and marked over a hundred on their own. So what? why lie?
  
  Report this comment
Chuck7884
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 12:01pm
Are All reports that bad? come on now. All reporters exaggerating the truth to sell there papers and sell air time? That would be a conspiracy so big I do not want to even think about it, Are the videos and voice recordings all coincidental? And must be ignored?. And how about those Interviews that were debunked by the main media? those that lied about being family members. Who were they just some nut looking for fame?. and how did they get attention in the first place?. Am i now a Nut and a fruit cake for Questioning these examples? Think about the reports one rifle now he took 2 rifles one in the trunk and one found in the school. 2 pistols become 4 pistols. then the shotgun. Adam Lanza is becoming larger and larger in life as time progresses. Almost super human.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Ghandi was a Republican
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:58am
All of the above. This has been a strategy to create chaos and drive policy from CRISIS for decades.
It’s not the conspiracy you hear maybe. It goes much deeper into “how we got here” over time.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
am123
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:58am
Regarding the weapons used, at about the 1:23:35 mark in the video, the police scanner mentions there are long rifles (plural) AND shotguns (plural) in the school. And do not think it is the so-called truthers who are creating confusion about the weapons used. Here you have State Police Lt. J Paul Vance stating that all 26 victims in Newtown were shot with an assault rifle:

http://www.ctpost.com/newtownshooting/article/State-Police-All-26-Newtown-victims-shot-with-4220548.php

And get this. Straining his credibility, he amazingly says “It’s all these conspiracy theorists that are trying to mucky up the waters”. Perhaps he thinks ABC, NBC, and CBS are conspiracy theorists, for here are

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=HK8Z5K5M2Dw

And doesn’t the Blaze or others consider it a wee bit disconcerting that at the beginning of this investigation, State Police Lt. Vance said all the information regarding this case would be coming from his microphone and anyone posting information on social media would be prosecuted? It sounds like they are trying to kill 2 birds with one stone—the 1st and 2nd amendments.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
RaydocX
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:55am
whether because the media was so rabid erroneous ‘facts’ were presented, or because the authorities rush to appease the media led to erroneous ‘facts’ being reported, or whether the lack of information offered initially contributed to assumptions and suppositions that were later erroneous, there are conflicting statements and ‘facts’ about the shooting, some of which DO generate valid questions.

the location of the AR, initially reportedly in the car, and now described as having been used in the shooting is the biggest in my personal opinion, and data from the autopsies– not merely the coroner’s reports– would help with that, but the public won’t get the full truth about this.

as to the conspiracies swirling, it’s no different than the claims about 9-11… when your conspiracy involves dozens of unseen and unspeaking people, it’s a fantasy. and in this case, it hurts those who make a valid claim that people in the government and in the press are taking advantage of it, blowing things out of proportion, ignoring facts, and hyping emotion for their own ends.

it’s a shame that there are people so distrustful of our government that they can envision a scenario where the killer was manipulated by the government. and it’s more of a shame that their misplaced– if not misguided– suspicions hurt the critical assessment of what was done during the shooting, and what is being done in the country by our leaders since.

RIP children and heroes of Sandy Hook,

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Jloyoyo
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:19pm
  I am sure the Native Americans were very trusting of the US Federal Government when they accepted the Small Pox infected blankets.
  
  Report this comment
- Mil-Dot
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:41pm
  Ray,
  I saw that video of the cop clearing the SEMI-AUTOMATIC SHOTGUN with my own two eyes. That was NOT an AR-15. I repeat NOT an AR-15. It was no Saiga either like others have posited. It looks to me to be a Mossberg 930 SPX. It was held sideways, with ejection port up and racked several times. I have hand built many AR-15s. I know what they look like. THAT was not an AR-15. Please let go of that crap. I despise Obama and the progs with every molecule of my body, but please let that go. You are wrong. That said, carry on patriot.
  
  Report this comment
- Mil-Dot
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 3:54pm
  It could be a Saiga. Others are entitled to their opinions. Hopefully, some day, we will find out. Not holding my breath though. I say Moss 930 SPX. But, I could be wrong. Totally crappy video to make a solid ID.
  
  Report this comment
am123
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:54am
While belatedly, at least the Blaze is allowing another point of view on Sandy Hook. And Mark Howitt should be applauded for raising some of the many unanswered anomalies about this incident. Where is the video of Adam Lanza entering the school? Regarding the off duty tactical officer caught running into the woods—why was he running AWAY from the school instead of running TO the school to help? Why didn’t the media report that police were looking for a purple van with guys disguised as nuns (check out the video at about the 26:30 mark)? Could it have been these two:

http://theintelhub.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Nuns.png

Do yourself a favor and watch this video and make up your own mind as to whether we are getting the truth from the national media or if this story is being molded and crafted to fit an agenda.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
GroundZero is Nuclear Demolition x3
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:52am
The ONLY mass shooting to have no injuries, nor any 1st hand witnesses.
The Children described the sounds as “someone hitting a trashcan”, the same sound a silencer makes.
Holmes couldn’t be IDed as the shooter, yet he takes off all his external gear and is found in a dysfunctional state of mind in less than a minute.
For those who can’t recognize a set up, here is a clue: http://youtu.be/m3RpDvI_TLM
Or how about the MSM, PROVEN to be MYTH, AL-CIADA: http://youtu.be/cHAwbYpRGkQ
Maybe the real international terror org known as Gladio, where Interpol’s number 1 most wanted is allowed to, LITERALLY, fly out a Swiss prison and settle in Chicago unabated: http://youtu.be/bsWHafahbvs

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- riseandshine
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 12:06pm
  Nuclear demolition?…no planes?…..yeah…you believe that.
  
  Report this comment
- GroundZero is Nuclear Demolition x3
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 12:22pm
  Well R&S, for the 5th time, what is your opinion of what happened.
  I prove my POV with the LAWS OF PHYSICS, yet all you do is DENY DENY DENY w/o any contrary POV or explanation. Just “believe me” statement with NOTHING WHAT SO EVER to back it up.
  
  Report this comment
- DoseofReality
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:41pm
  Groundzero – your a moron and have no idea what facts even are. Just go hide back inside whatever sh*thold you crawled out of….you make me sick
  
  Report this comment
- tzion
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:52pm
  Laws of physics? Not once have you even tried to utilize even one of Newton’s laws. All you do is cite physical properties of materials, which are NOT laws, and make baseless conclusions from said data. A comparable argument would be saying that the foam that destroyed Columbia couldn’t have done so because foam is softer than the shuttle’s hull.
  
  Using REAL physics, I was able to estimate that, in order for a plane not to penetrate the building (which you say is impossible), the steel would have to sustain approximately 20 million pounds of force, an impossible feat. Without this force, the plane could not stop moving forward and would necessarily penetrate the wall of the building. That’s how the laws of physics work.
  
  Report this comment
- Dirtdigger67
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 8:51pm
  Ground zero the heat from the fire weakens the steel beams and eventually the buildings fell . Simple as that . My wife called me told me what happened I told her that the buildings were going to come down . She said how do you know I said because I have done demolition on many buildings that have been burned and seen the effects of heat on steel it ain’t pretty!! So how about that physics lesson!!
  
  Report this comment
- GroundZero is Nuclear Demolition x3
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 8:41am
  @tsion “Laws of physics? Not once have you even tried to utilize even one of Newton’s laws.” Keep telling that lie some 19 hijacker nut job might believe it. Conservation of momentum, why did the Empire St bld occupants state “the building swung like a pendulum for 30sec” yet no one inside EITHER tower stated anything of the sort, when OVER ten times the energy should have been transferred into a MORE FLEXIBLE material. The foam from Columbia did not go completely through the wing, it DEFLECTED off, causing damage. I can still see evidence of the foam AFTER IMPACT, unlike the aircraft HOAX. The buildings weighed a BILLION pounds each, FIFTY times the force required to prevent entry, COMPLETE PENETRATION OUT OF SITE IS NOT POSSIBLE! It would take approximately 220 sq in of A36 structural steel to sustain the counter force that is ONE SQ INCH FOR EVERY FOOT IN WING SPAN, how stupid are you, really?
  
  @dirt#igger You continue to follow Alex Jones on this one huh? Again, FUEL BOMBS DON’T WORK IN CONFINED AREAS, NOT ENOUGH OXYGEN. The smoke isn’t even pitch black, like a jet fuel fire would be in atmospheric conditions. Again, NOT ENOUGH OXYGEN TO MAKE SUCH HIGH TEMPS. The bellows were invented by black smiths to SOFTEN iron enough to work it w/ a hammer, and coal burns much hotter than jet fuel (kerosene).
  
  Keep asking questions, you guy will eventually figure it out.
  
  @theBlaze As many articles I have read of Billy Hackwell, how does he still have a job?
  
  Report this comment
EQUALIZER
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:51am
Regardless of the theories, Glenn, please look at all of the interviews and tell me that something isn’t wrong here. Human emotions do not lie, I have yet to see a tear from any parent,family member, or Gene Rosen.Look at the Katie Couric interviews. I am a human lie detector and I guarantee you something is very,very wrong with the SandyHook event.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- DoseofReality
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 12:01pm
  yuo are a human lie detector? lol…your an *sshole is what you are….
  
  Report this comment
- CulperGang
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:28pm
  Exactly Equalizer. Exactly. In real events the parents are bawling their eyes out. Choke up when trying to speak. Their eyes would be red, swollen from being rubbed, because of the torrent of non stop tears. Unconsolably sobbing. Again it goes back to my 1st responder cousins question, “Where are the NUMEROUS mutual aid mARKED vehicles from the adjoining area? NOWHERE Real time mutual aid during disaster has a myriad of different agency vehicles all over the kplace.
  
  You got answers Blaze editor stooges??? We are all ears. Mocking truthers gets you a big QUESTION marks on your forehead=”who do you work for?
  
  print the truth.
  
  Report this comment
- CulperGang
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:13pm
  Dose of reality……….here is reality: human body can be “read” for emotions which INVOLUNTARILY manifest via heightened or lower emotions. Sweaty palms. Flushed face. Face Blanching. Those are the obvious. Dr.s good ones…..knowing physiology can detect more, that is not obvious to the untrained eye.
  
  Report this comment
- tzion
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 2:35pm
  Those interviews weren’t conducted live were they? We’re the parents wearing makeup? How much editing was done? People express grief differently and have means of coping. Unless you were monitoring them 24/7 you couldn’t be certain.
  
  Report this comment
woodyee
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:46am
God bless those Canadians! They stood by us during Vietnam, fight alongside us in Afghanistan, and when the fit hits the shan HERE, AT HOME, it’s Canadian citizens who join in our rancor against our Federal government’s over-reaching.

You might not agree with Howitt – but it’s my opportunity to say something positive about our Northern Brethren! Here’s what they had to say about us in 1973 – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJ_okAgAUGE

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- saranda
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 12:19pm
  Canada did not fight in Vietnam. In fact its official opposition to the bombing of North Vietnam caused problems between the two countries rarely seen. Canada took in both draft dodgers and war resisters (read deserters) and again this was a problem in dipolmatic relations. On the flip side, about 30,000 Canadians joined the US service to fight in SE Asia.
  They have likely been the US best allies in Afghanistan.
  
  Report this comment
- woodyee
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 12:59pm
  Saranda, I said they STOOD by us during ‘Nam, and the video I posted is evidence of it, but your point is well taken, and I thank you for it! ;-)
  
  Report this comment
Uncurable wound
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:45am
spot on!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Uncurable wound
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:44am
What happened to you glennn?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- woodyee
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:55am
  Stop blaming Glenn – it’s billy hall-O’well’s story. Apparently he was beaten to a gay-oriented headline by another writer this morning, and had to find SOMETHING to stoke the fire with…
  
  Report this comment
- Steelhead
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 12:31pm
  wood- that’s some funny and true assertions
  
  Report this comment
- truthnstuff
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:56pm
  Yep. Billy seems to be progressive and slants everything in that direction. I think he is encinom.
  
  Report this comment
FIREANDBRIMSTONE
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:41am
Well that wont be hard for the Blaze to do considering most of Becks worshippers are these types of crazies.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- RaydocX
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:57am
  and you love us all so much you have to sit here and ingest each story, too.
  
  that’s sweet, now go ask for more of that special medicine…
  
  Report this comment
- GroundZero is Nuclear Demolition x3
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:57am
  Bold talk coming from an account started YESTERDAY.!.
  
  Report this comment
- mecanic
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 12:14pm
  @GroundZero is Nuclear Demolition x3…..mine wasn’t started yesterday JACKAZZ. go take your meds and leave the grownups alone, fruit loop.
  
  Report this comment
- toto
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 12:41pm
  Do not be so quick to judge Beck’s readers. I respect him for allowing other points of view, something the main stream media seems to be incapable of. Rational, critical thinking and analysis of consequences seems to have gone the way of the dodo bird for a very high percentage of Americans. It saddens and scares me to death. Believing the Obama administration tells you the truth about ANYTHING they are doing is naive. In my almost 70 years, have never seen so many lies and damn lies and outright corruption as has come out of this administration, and should you have the audacity to question it, whether as a newsperson, Congressional person or private citizen, you are vilified both personally and professionally. It OUGHT to bother ALL Americans, but it does not, and it is those ignorant of history and the Obotomized drinking the Koolaide that are the REAL and PRESENT danger to our country.
  
  Report this comment
- GroundZero is Nuclear Demolition x3
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:19pm
  @Mexicanic I don’t take meds, but it’s sad to hear that is an accepted practice among your family and friends. People who practice such perversions tend to point a finger at others to prevent themselves from being ferreted out.
  
  Report this comment
cessna152
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:34am
Do I think the government did this? No! Do I think it was hatched by the state? No! However, I do look how Britain, Scotland and Australia went about with their gun bans. After HORRIFIC massacres happened they had sweeping laws. All of these killers seemed to have on thing in common…medicated, whacked out nut cases. Were they “coerced” into doing what they did so gun control measures could be implemented? I don’t know, but as we become closer and closer to being taken over, the frequency of these attacks are increasing.

Americans (for the most part) know guns are simply an instrument for murder and a nut case will kill or get some sort of instrument regardless of the laws. Mexico, India, South America, etc have some of the strictest gun laws (even bans) yet, more people are killed in these location than in the USA. Lets put it this way, I don’t think it’s “happenstance”… there is only two ways to end the 2A:
1) Public opinion coming from “knee jerk” reactions played on the hearts of law abiders.
2) Remove people from guns because they are found “incapable” of ownership.(IE insane)

I feel the latter is where we are headed!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- CulperGang
  Posted on February 4, 2013 at 1:53pm
  During WWII Britain had a huge fleet off tanks and airplanes sitting on the coast of Dover.German spies and areal surveillance reported back to the Fuhrer of this huge amassing of armaments. Changing Hitlers mind about “a landing invasion of Britain”.
  REALITY: They were ALL “blowups” not REAL. THIS IS know as false/flag/psyops all designed to mislead to gain an objective. The objective wa sto prevent a “nazi land invasion.” (it worked) They are done in “frequency” until objective is gained.
  
  What are the objective in the recent ramped up events of attacks on the Amercian people real; or not?
  Well you tell me:
  Farmers are being harassed out of existence. Fisheries the same.Manufacturing closed. Energy being closed off. BUREAUCRATS closing down the system WITH MILLIONS of collateral damage who just happen to be armed and are getting angier by the day AT THOSE BUREAUCRATS.
  So you tell me, what is the objective of “disarmament” of Joe the plumber.
  Why don’t they just do away with school buses that YEARLY kill kids in the nation from accidents, Taking three to nine out in, one go. Because it isn’t about the kids.
  Reality: Globalist agenda. Destroy America. 60% of government high echelons are good with this. THAT IS WHY THEY WANT YOUR GUNS. They are afraid of a “Mussolini” repeat. They are selfish,evil cowards. “I got mines….f…..u, Joe Plumber,” mentality.
  
  Print the truth Blaze. 4God&Country.
  
  Report this comment
Tri-ox
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:33am
“The fever-pitch surrounding Sandy Hook Trutherism” – Uh, only at The Blaze however …

Here we go again. The Blaze is completely obsessed with debunking supposed Sandy Hook conspiracies – it’s a shame that The Blaze spends so much time on this crap and zero time on asking questions about what actually happened in Newtown. Very few details about the shooter and the attack have been released, but, according to Glenn and The Blaze, we should just be good little, quiet sheep, and accept the official story, without question. It’s very sad and insulting.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
skippy6
Posted on February 4, 2013 at 11:29am
Truthers have come out with new ideas and theories aimed at poking holes in the official narrative.

ALERT ALERT a must watch video for truthers!!!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3l3R1FcO2A

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- revelation2012
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:19am
  the video has been removed,,,
  
  Report this comment

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.