Developing: Bridge Collapses Near Seattle…Unknown Injuries…See the Photos

Watch Today’s BlazeCast With Your Questions, Comments & Live Chat!

TheBlaze TV

Beck Delivers Excoriating Rebuke of Ron Paul Over ‘Ugly and Offensive’ Tweet About Chris Kyle’s Death

Feb. 5, 2013 11:14am Billy Hallowell

This morning, Glenn Beck delivered an excoriating rebuke of former Texas congressman Ron Paul. The radio host’s tough words for the former representative were an official response to Paul’s much-publicized tweet about ex-NAVY SEAL Chris Kyle’s death. Beck began his comments by praising Kyle’s bravery and his devotion to America, going on to outline his shock at the politician’s decision to comment so callously.

The host honored Kyle as “one of the brightest, bravest heroes” and praised him for his combat tours. In addition to highlighting this devotion to the military and penchant for saving American lives, Beck also focused upon other important attributes pertaining to Kyle’s faith and family roles.

“A husband, a father, a son, an unquestioned patriot — a man who didn’t talk about Jesus, but lived his Christian belief — was senselessly murdered by a fellow veteran he was just trying to help,” he continued.

After praising the brave ex-SEAL, Beck outlined his surprise by Paul’s Twitter message, which read (in case you missed it), “Chris Kyle’s death seems to confirm that ‘he who lives by the sword dies by the sword.’ Treating PTSD at a firing range doesn’t make sense.” The radio host held little back in his reaction.

“Well, Dr. Paul, he wasn’t treating it. I’m sorry that you listened to the media,” he said “I thought you knew better than that. Aren’t you a guy that just loves to blame the media on coverups — on things like Tower number Seven? Suddenly, you rush to believe the media.”

Glenn Beck Responds to Ron Pauls Tweet About Chris Kyles Death

Glenn Beck responds to former Rep. Ron Paul’s tweet about ex-NAVY SEAL Chris Kyle (Photo Credit: TheBlaze TV)

But rather than tearing into the former congressman further, at this point, Beck paused to note Paul’s devotion to the U.S. Constitution and, despite disagreeing with him on many sentiments, the host noted that the two do, indeed, share some ideas “about freedom and the constitution.” While Beck believes that Paul has fought hard to uphold these values, disagreement abounds.

Despite ideological inconsistencies, though, Beck said that there is no reason that the two can’t respect one another. Holding this ideal in place, he continued to respectfully rail against the politician’s Twitter statement.

“I understand so unbelievably clearly that you don’t like the foreign wars our nation has been involved in…some of us are at a different level of understanding,” Beck said, speaking directly to Paul. “We’re not all Dr. Paul, now, but Chris Kyle and those like him are not the policy makers, doctor, as Americans we don’t go over to the graves of even the German soldiers from WWII and dance on them — because it’s what sets us apart — a fundamental respect for life.”

The host said that Kyle gave his all as a volunteer in a nation that never required him to sacrifice so much of himself. The former SEAL, Beck said, was special — an individual who put his life where his beliefs reside. In this respect, Beck highlighted that the congressman and Kyle have some common ground.

“Dr. Paul, so many Americans admire you because you are willing to put yourself out there in Washington for a cause in which you believe,” he noted. “Chris Kyle was no different…he was willing to put [himself] out there for a cause that he believed [in].”

(Photo Credit: Andrew Burton/Getty Images)

Rather than coming from the lips (or keyboard, in this case) of a seasoned elder statesman, Beck said that Paul’s tweet sounded like something that would come from radical groups like Code Pink or Westboro Baptist Church, calling the social media statement “beneath” the former representative. The host said that one of the main problems that abounds in today’s society is a failure for individuals to treat one another decently and he even wondered if Paul regrets his “serious, serious error in judgement.”

Acknowledging that some would potentially point the finger at him as someone who has fallen prey to uttering unfavorable statements in the past, Beck admitted that “we’ve all said things that we shouldn’t have said,” but that people should learn and grow from these experiences. And while he stands fervently against Paul’s statements, the host affirmed that he is a big believer in the First Amendment.

“I find Ron Paul’s speech ugly and offensive, but I defend his right to say it and I would not violate it or ask anyone else to violate it by having him silent,” Beck proclaimed “More speech — not less speech — but it requires all of us in responsible ways to respond because that is the right that so many like Chris Kyle fought for.”

The host also noted that for those wondering why he has never — and could never — support Paul, this example provides both explanation and corroboration.

“This should finally answer your question,” Beck said.

Watch Beck’s response in full, below:

–

Glenn Beck’s charitable organization, Mercury One, is taking donations for those wishing to honor Navy SEAL Chris Kyle and his friend Chad Littlefield.

To donate by mail:
Mercury One
PO Box 140489
Irving, TX 75014

Make checks payable to Mercury one but in the memo field please write “Chris Kyle Fund.”

–

Related:

UPDATED: Ron Paul Account Tweets Shock Message About Former SEAL Sniper’s Death

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (646)

passingby
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:37pm
Without doubt my comment will be scrolled past, but that is okay I suppose. What Ron Paul stated, as has been said, what a direct quote from the Bible. So are you equally angry with the Bible? Also, with clear understanding I now have of Revelations 3:15-16. It amazes me how those who proclaim to be Christians, yet react with the same venom as the Pharisees and Chief Scribes, when truth is spoken to them. Ron Paul has been consistent in his personal spiritual belief. I recall his speech on the floor of the House, and the definition of Just War. In that I remember him stating, “perhaps I have been reading from a different Bible.”

So in ending, it appears many, especially Beck, wish to pick and choose from the Word of God. Pick and choose the words spoken by Jesus Christ.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- justangry
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 5:57pm
  The Blaze needs a “like” button.
  
  Report this comment
cbrian1978
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:34pm
One thing maybe someone can explain to me, and before I ask keep in mind that I am a veteran who is transitioning from straight ticket Republican to Libertarian.
We fear the government, it’s over-reach into our lives, it’s ever expanding nature, and it’s apparent assaults on our liberties. But at the same time we glorify the military and police, which are the enforcing arm of the government we fear. It is beyond politically correct to criticize either. I understand our need for protection as a country, and I understand that the men and women of the military did not ask to go to war but served accordingly at the request of their leaders. There is a problem with the military and police that cannot be discussed due to the sensitivity of the subject. The problem will only get worse with time. The military of today is not the military of our grandparents or even our parents generations, but we are not allowed to speak of it. There is also problems within our police forces, that again we are not allowed to speak of.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- NigelTufnel
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 5:29pm
  Great post. At any time,….the military or police force can be turned on the citizens. All it takes is a little bit of pressure.
  
  Report this comment
Rojolobo
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:22pm
Glens just pissed his mormon candidate didn’t win the election. Blaming Paul supporters for not voting for Romney. Glen doesn’t get it.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- riseandshine
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:54pm
  No…..Glenn is a neocon shill.
  
  Report this comment
cbrian1978
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:22pm
Glenn, I too am a new follower of the libertarian movement, and wrestle with these issues. I do not however judge based on a few mistakes. I like to use much less emotion than you do, and look at the overall issue. Weather you agree or disagree with Mr. Paul’s tweet regarding this tragedy, does not mean that you throw the baby out with the bath water. I have not seen you so passionate about an issue for some time. I sense a hostility for Mr. Paul that goes beyond this incident. While you preach being civil towards one another, you push in your own way against Ron Paul. What you have not realized while your doing this is that many of his “followers” you call them, are also following you. You have dragged us through the mud over the years, but you spoke enough truth to allow us to forgive and move on for the greater good of defeating the enemy within our government. If you truly believe what you just so passionately preached, then remember that. Of course those that step out of line should be remanded, but they should not be put on a cross and burned. You Mr. Beck have just lite many fires.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:35pm
  I get closer each time Beck talks, to just cancelling my subscription and turning him off.
  
  He talks a good game, until he turns everything he just said right on its head by supporting these stupid wars and an offensive military. He’s sold out to the military contractors, in my opinion, and is not thinking and going back to first principles for an understanding of the law and our system.
  
  Report this comment
- cbrian1978
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:44pm
  I do not think he has sold out. I think he is still in that transition period. He is getting closer but still to emotional. The moment he can tackle a story without taking it as personal as if someone had killed a loved one, he will have arrived.
  
  Report this comment
GoodStuff
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:19pm
This is why conservatives should avoid the Paul family, including Rand, like the plague.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Rojolobo
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:23pm
  Glens just pissed all the libertarians didn’t vote for Romney.
  
  Report this comment
katzkiner
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:13pm
Everything I blog is intercepted, every site I visit is recorded, every gun I own is known, everything I buy with a plastic card is recorded, every conversation I have with a medical professional is reported, everywhere I go I am recorded by CCTV. I am followed by unseen drones. I can be black bagged and disappeared forever, with no legal recourse, I can be killed by government gunners or drones in secret no questions asked. I am not free, I am just not in the gunsights, YET. Welcome to Nazi America Zieg Obama!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- katzkiner
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:46pm
  I like Paul, but, to state the sword parable was not defendable. Kyle was defending his countrymen, his people from an enemy who had sworn to kill us. We have no control over our government. We do our best. The tweet was a misapplication of the parable anyway. Jesus taught evil must be destroyed. Stick around, you will see the Wrath Of God in his time, not ours. I am sure Paul is tired and distressed by what he sees. Give him a break, he is a good man.
  
  Report this comment
The Big Mick
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:12pm
Didn’t see the vid, but one thing did leap out at me in Paul’s follow up “explanations”and his apologists’ comment posts—and this is vis a vis something Beck is on record as saying a while back.
In one statement Paul alludes to “A policy of non-violence, as Christ preached” in the same breath with “Unconstitutional and unnecessary wars”. !…!?!…..???????!!!!!!!!!
UP TILL NOW, I got the impression Paul was agin the War on Constitutional “Not Declared” grounds with a good dose of Isolationist “no foreign entanglements, no adventurism, interventionism, ‘nation building’” supposedly rooted in The Founders. So also his partisans, remembering, of course, their Problems with “Israel” and “The Jews” and “Neocons” which is code for all of the above.
But THIS is letting the cat out of the bag in a BIG way.
Paul appears to NOW be basing his Opposition to Our War for Survival Against the Islamicist Hegemony ON PACIFIST Grounds!
DANG! Is he SERIOUS? Does he regard ALL Wars, even when ATTACKED as WRONG? Are we to respond to Aggression, Attack, INVASION, with Gandhi/Jesus “non-violence” PACIFISM? “Turning the other cheek”, “do not resist the evil doer”, “he who would take your coat, give him your shirt?”
C.S. Lewis points out that is the Quickest Way to make sure there are NO Pacifist Nations, cause the Totalitarian JihadiNAZIS will have gobbled em UP!
cont.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- The Big Mick
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:28pm
  A case CAN, and HAS been from the Earliest Church, for Pacifism, but what that MEANS is universal rejection of the use of force EVER by ANYBODY. Yes, EVEN POLICE! The Thoughtful Student is invited to picture THAT Society.
  Though the REALLY Thoughtful Student is referred to L. Neil Smith’s Libertarian SciFi Utopia “The North American Confederation where the Foundational Ethic is “It is wrong to INITIATE force against someone.” Blowing their head off in RESPONSE to THEIR attempt to use force against YOU or your neighbor is ENCOURAGED!
  HOWEVER, the Observant Student has already noted that the case AGAINST STATE Pacifism is also made from the Earliest Church, is present in the Biblical Manuscripts (see Romans 13), and was codified by Augustine’s “Just War” in Late 4th Early 5th Century.
  I would really like to see Ron and the Paul Potters come CLEAN on this. What is the ROOT of their Opposition to “The War”? Jesus/Gandhi Pacifism, Constitutionalism, Isolationism, Anti-Semitism, All round jerkasz prickness?
  And I’d like to see Glenn defend his REJECTION of Pacifism as FOREIGN policy (if indeed he does reject it) and his rebuke of Paul, in light of his CALL for Gandhi/Jesus Pacifism in DOMESTIC Political Struggle.
  A RAGING Cognitive Dissonance to me, but he can try.
  
  Report this comment
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:38pm
  To answer your question:
  
  No, Paul is NOT against war when necessary.
  
  But it had DAMNED WELL be NECESSARY, and the government ought to tell the truth about it, and the Constitutional procedures ought to be followed.
  
  There is a “Christian Just War Theory” that Paul follows.
  
  Look it up. It’s enlightened, and practical.
  
  What is IMPRACTICAL, is what we’ve been doing. It’s insane, and it’s time to change.
  
  Report this comment
- cbrian1978
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:42pm
  Do you even see that your hate flows into what you type? Why the hate? Ron Paul never claimed to be a pacifist, he severed his country. He is against wars without merit, it is simple. You provokingly attack the U.S. you turn to glass. However, if we over throw a dictator replacing him with our own dictator who in turn kills 1,000′s under the protection of us, then no, we are not being attacked unprovoked. All is fair in love and war, unless it happens to us? Stick your nose in someone else’s business and you will get it cut off. But for you to cry that it was cut off makes no sense. It’s called blow back. Am I happy when blow back occurs? NO!! But I do believe that it takes many innocent lives on both sides, and I for one do not want to loose men and women on my side so that the government can play ‘the game’.
  
  Report this comment
cbrian1978
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:09pm
The left has no morals, they can all get on board no matter the issue. The right is so divided, the smallest issue can split it fifteen different ways. That is why the left will continue our country down it’s current path.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
MissEllaneous
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:09pm
Glenn, you have a ways to go before you can call yourself a libertarian. Paul’s point was right on. Kyle was a guy who defined himself by the number of people he killed. Why is that excusable because he was in the military?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Rojolobo
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:25pm
  Glens just pissed nobody wanted to vote for his mormon brother Romney.
  
  Report this comment
Ming The Merciless
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:08pm
Did Chris live by the sword?

Did Chris die by the sword?

Did Chris really knock out Jesse Ventura?

If not – why would he claim that?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:39pm
  Yes.
  
  Yes.
  
  No.
  
  To sell a book.
  
  Report this comment
- Ming The Merciless
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 3:18pm
  Thank you Norm – I see no problem with the comment by Ron Paul. It was factual.
  
  Report this comment
Brettfan
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 1:57pm
Glenn Beck exposed the Muslim Brotherhood and the Project to take over America. he also took on George Soros and Obama. He exposed Agenda 21 and the coming economic destruction. Beck is a patriot. He now supports Chris Kyle like Rand Paul. Amen to that.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Rojolobo
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:36pm
  Glen just repackaged all the work Alex jones been doing for the past 15 years. If you need to thank someone thank Alex Jones.
  
  Report this comment
bernieyuiop
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 1:56pm
I was once a supporter of Mr. Beck. He has lost sight of what is important. He is more interested in his 80 million dollar a year empire. He cons the old and young fools out of their money through fear and his own brand of societal utopian ideas built on a fantasy world that never really existed in this country. He has gone from an alcoholic cocaine sniffing junkie into one of the greatest con men of our day. I suggest Mr. Beck go back and re-read our constitution and the words of our founding fathers. Beck made his fortune stealing from Alex Jones and now tries to discredit him. Beck has no idea what freedom is. His rubes will continue to make him rich and when the going gets tough lets see how long it takes for Mr. Beck to run to Switzerland with his millions stuffed into his magic Mormon underwear, laughing all the way. Mr. Beck sold out. He found his audience, just like Maher and Letterman. And like them he plays them like a fiddle. I’ll give him this, he is smart, smart like a fox, only, he’s a weasel and his minions are too blind to see it. Maybe if his ocular disease takes away his vision he will finally see the light. One can only hope he see’s the error of his ways one day.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
DoOrDie
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 1:50pm
Americans, you all forget. These people in government like Ron Paul and the people on radio, TV and movies are no better than we are. They are just people that Americans were most unfortunate to have had them serve us. That is why the founding fathers wanted the citizens of America to be the deciding factor. Who gives a damn what Ron or Glenn says. They are no better than you or I.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:42pm
  Not better, but CONSISTENT, and CORRECT.
  
  With a long enough record of being consistently correct, and espousing consistent principles, you get to where you trust a guy’s judgment.
  
  Report this comment
Lovesmesomeglennbeck
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 1:39pm
Glenn was right to call Ron Paul out on that tweet, so you need to lay off of Glenn Beck, Paulbots. Some of us still like Glenn. He is still great to listen to.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:45pm
  He’s great to listen to, but so is Elvis Presley.
  
  He’s wrong. Period.
  
  But still puts on a Hell of a show.
  
  Report this comment
- Lovesmesomeglennbeck
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:55pm
  I like Glenn Beck for what he says and for doing the right thing. I voted for Romney in the last election because Ron Paul was too nuts. Glenn did a right thing to call Ron Paul out on his tweet.
  
  Report this comment
- Ming The Merciless
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 3:24pm
  Glenn Beck doing the right thing? Wow are you twisted.
  
  Glenn Beck has supported big government neo-cons in the last 3 elections – why?
  
  Report this comment
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 4:04pm
  Again, you look for consistency and correctness.
  
  Beck was incorrect when he supported Romney. Romney lost.
  
  Beck is incorrect when he supports the PATRIOT Act and other infringements on our rights.
  
  Beck is incorrect when he claims that Ron Paul supporters are terrorists, and that we should be rounded up and shot or imprisoned.
  
  Beck gets it wrong every single time he opens his mouth to support these wars.
  
  Paul? Consistently correct. For decades.
  
  Report this comment
- Ming The Merciless
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 6:44pm
  Right on Norm! Glenn CAN’T claim that record!
  
  Report this comment
Malcom0983
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 1:35pm
Beck is a wanna be libertarian ursurper just like the neocons, RINOs and Democracks (including GB) with the Tea Party. It would be funny if it wasn’t so sad. You want to steal and pervert Ron Paul’s movement, his party and now his words.
There are different levels/types of PTSD. The shooter should have been assessed before being taken to the range.
It’s tantamount to taking a shell shocked (WWI PTSD) soldier, sailor or marine to an artillery range. It’s just a bad idea.
With that said, Chris Kyle served honorably and being shot wasn’t his fault. He had good intentions that backfired. God rest Chris Kyle and I pray for his family.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- spidah59
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 1:45pm
  “You want to steal and pervert Ron Paul’s movement, his party and now his words” Seriously dude….
  Put the pretty pink cup down.
  
  Report this comment
- Malcom0983
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 1:59pm
  That was a well thought out and articulate rebuttal. I totally agree with whatever you believe. Thank you for helping me see the error of my way.
  
  Report this comment
- Rojolobo
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:34pm
  Glen Beck is cutting off his noise despite his face. He doesn’t seem to realize the huge support of Ron Paul among the youth. Young and energetic. Purposely decided not to report the massive crowds of young voters supporting Ron Paul. Thousands of young people at his event. Meanwhile Romney might have a dozen old dudes. Romney, and in the future Republicans, will never steal those voters. This says it all, and shows why Glen was waiting for a reason to bash Ron.
  http://images.sodahead.com/profiles/0/0/2/7/7/7/7/8/9/RonPaul-Romney-CROWDS-74982025317.png
  
  Report this comment
- Ming The Merciless
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 6:49pm
  Love that pic ROJOLOBO! Great find.
  
  Ron had the numbers for the rally compared to Mittens! Glenn never brought that fact up on his show – NEVER!
  
  It’s called blow back Glenn and it’s coming your way.
  
  Report this comment
spidah59
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 1:33pm
Ron Paul is one large POS…..time to flush him.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- cbrian1978
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:47pm
  We will follow you around. First time I catch you messing up, your done. You can go play for Obama. Sound logical?
  
  Report this comment
billjac
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 1:26pm
Pauliacs, are you proud of Ron Paul now? How do you sleep? He’s even more of a fringe figure now. Put him on the shelf with Dennis Kucinich, Noam Chomsky and L. Ron Hubbard.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:52pm
  Yes, we are proud of him. He has been a consistent voice of reason and rationality for decades, and has fought tyranny and constitutional apostasy for decades.
  
  And we uphold the principles he espouses.
  
  But we do not worship him, or consider him a messiah. The effort to free this country, is far too important to get distracted in that way.
  
  Report this comment
Kumo
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 1:26pm
My opinions on both Ron Paul and Glenn Beck are unimportant, however the following needs to be stated.

Libertarians and Republicans better learn to agree to disagree really quick, or we are never going to win against our common enemy.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
dexterslab1976
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 1:20pm
Beck gives libertarians a bad name. He is a wanna be that has been after Paul of a long time. It isnt surprising that Beck only posted a little bit of what Paul actually said and then the blind idiots who decided to just take Beck at his word are just as bad as he is.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
ishshah
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 1:18pm
Those who continue to swallow what the spin doctors give them are ill informed as they rant and rave over what has no been fully disclosed.
Chrs Kyle was a good solider in the N.W.O.s scheme of things. Meaning he was an odbedient pawn that is working toward destroying America,not to mention the number of innocent lives that he took in a foreign country and he is praised as a hero?? lol
The blind truly do walk in step with the blind guides that they are so easily manipulated into following.
Ron Paul didn’t say anything that wasn’t true.

It is written; If anyone is to be taken captive, to captivity he goes; if anyone is to be slain with the sword, with the sword must he be slain. Here is a call for the endurance and faith of the saints.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Tom Ballard
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 1:17pm
I use to like Ron Paul but over the las few years He has become a nut job

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Ming The Merciless
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:22pm
  No you didn’t – don’t lie.
  
  Report this comment
- passingby
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:50pm
  Obviously you knew nothing about Ron Paul, as his views have not changed one bit. I can only conclude that you are either lying, or you are one of the low information sheeple.
  
  Report this comment
- Ming The Merciless
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 3:22pm
  Tom Ballard – you probably voted for Mitt Romney in the primaries/caucuses and voted for Mittens for president.
  
  You never liked Ron Paul – stop uttering nonsense.
  
  Report this comment
leonardo44
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 1:16pm
Thank you Glenn. I don’t know what is wrong with people who cannot show decency when an innnocent man, a true patriot has been murdered in cold blood. What Ron Paul tweeted was completely inappropriate and inexcusable. If Ron Paul is the heart of lIbertarianism, he’s just proven that he has no heart.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Norm D. Plume
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 3:07pm
  There are none so blind as those who will not see.
  
  Check your glasses.
  
  Report this comment
Cape_Lookout_RW_Extremist
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 1:15pm
Guys like Ron Paul see the world through rose colored glasses like Jimmy Carter. If we all just lay down our arms then the world would be such a better place. Wimpy Losers! The enemy doesn’t care about your unwillingness to fight for freedom. They want you dead, And guys like Paul would be fine to just let the enemy come and take him out without him putting up a fight. We that have fought have a vested interest in America’s success and if you aren’t with us then you too are our enemy.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- dexterslab1976
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 1:22pm
  Obviously you are not well read on what Paul has to say. He wants to build up our national defense and stop empire building around the wrold, which is causing more enemies. This would actually cause us to have less enemies and a stronger militray at home, instead of our military being scattered around the world. What problem do you have with that?
  
  Report this comment
ishshah
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 1:07pm
Glen Beck is not a guy that I would trust.He lays out enough bait to see what he can catch, but his own words betray him.
If he were really in the know, why then does he still believe that 911 was committed by a handful of guys wearing towels around their head? Not to mention his radio show sounds like a bunch of college boys who get off talking about their bowel movements. lol
Jesus warned us to be aware of those who confess to know Christ but in the process lead many away.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Guitar Master
Posted on February 5, 2013 at 12:58pm
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
From THE REPORTER
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Glenn Beck is NOT the Glenn Beck of old. His attitude has changed and the foremat of his show has changed. Almost to the point of being no fun and even boring to watch. Does he fully understand this?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Ming The Merciless
  Posted on February 5, 2013 at 2:23pm
  No – he’s a narcissist.
  
  Report this comment

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.