Watch Live: Congressional Hearing on IRS Scandal

Live Now on TheBlaze Radio: ‘The Buck Sexton Show’

Faith

Have You Seen the Huggies Commercial That Appears to Be Pro-Life? But There’s a Catch

Feb. 6, 2013 8:11am Billy Hallowell

Allegedly Pro Life Huggies Commercial Calls the Unborn a Baby But Theres a Catch

Photo Credit: YouTube

There’s a Huggies commercial that is capturing the attention — and support — of pro-lifers who find its general message inspiring. In the clip a woman finds out she is pregnant and is instantly exuberant. She calls her husband to come inside the house and shares the news.

“Honey, we’re pregnant. We’re pregnant!,” she yells.

Her husband, clearly over-the-moon, showcases his excitement as well, offering up some fascinating words about the unborn — buzzwords that would appeal to any pro-lifer.

“You’re going to be a mom…there’s a little baby in there,” the husband proclaims.” There’s a human being growing inside your stomach.”

It didn’t take long for outlets that take a stand against abortion to speak out. LifeNews’s Ellie Saul expressed her initial reaction upon seeing the 28-second spot:

When I saw it I was so encouraged! Yes! She has a life, a human life growing inside of her. A human being from conception to the first positive test, to the first heart beat, to the first breath. My heart was encouraged because it appears a national brand is advocating life! A national brand is presenting to you America, a human being. This is not a blob, not unviable cells; this is a human being in the womb.

Photo Credit: YouTube

But while Saul was initially encouraged by the ad, she noted alleged connections between Huggies’ parent company, Kimberly-Clark, and an organization that was founded, in part, by Planned Parenthood. She continues:

I thought that since Huggies acknowledged life in the womb they might advocate preserving life at every stage. I wanted to do all I could to promote them and this message, so I began to research them. What I found was startling. Huggies is a brand of Kimberly-Clark. Kimberly-Clark partners with Girls for a Change which was partially founded by Planned Parenthood.

The same mouth that acknowledges life advocates killing it in the name of choice and “girl power.”

Regardless of the company’s potential allegiances, the spot, itself, is interesting and does seem to strike a pro-life tone.

You can watch it, below:

What do you think about the ad? Let us know in the comments section.

(H/T: LifeNews.com)

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (78)

WillaB
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 7:34pm
Apparently life only begins at conception when it’s wanted. So very, very sad.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- sacwoodpusher
  Posted on February 7, 2013 at 12:30am
  Life begins prior to conception. Doesn’t the Catholic Church have a stance against self-abuse because it wastes potential life? If this follows, is it not immoral to let a human egg go unfertilized?
  
  Report this comment
LeadNotFollow
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 5:57pm
Hopefully, the owners of Kimberly-Clark have had a change of heart and now realize that life begins at conception.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
Margyt
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 4:13pm
When I first saw this ad my first cynical thought was that in our culture, a fetus is only a baby if it is wanted. Huggies is in the baby business and aborted babies don’t wear diapers. Thus the ad is potentially just a bit of crass marketing based on focus-group responses. It is very heartening, though, that some ad person thought of this, that the company bought it, and that there is a belief that it will be effective. It is the first ad that caught my attention in a positive way in a long time.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
corridor5
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 3:59pm
I appreciate that the results of the pregnancy test lead to the statement that a baby is growing, not simply tissue. One poster said that a human begins at time of heartbeat. Another said that perhaps it’s at time of brain waves. Another said that it’s at time of conception. What about when the spirit enters? I guess they’re all possibilities.

However, if a human begins at conception and anything after that is murder, some birth control methods would necessarily be illegal, i.e.: read Copper Intrauterine Device (IUD). The IUD can dislodge a fertilized egg from the uterus before the woman knows she’s pregnant. Would that be murder? In order to make a hard fast law about abortion we must know when life begins? Do we determine this by defining life in terms of biology, physics, etc?

I suggest that life biologically begins at conception and that the life is a human person. For, left to develop, these cells grow into a recognizable human.

When a growing life form is stopped, death occurs. When is it murder? In case of complications, when a father is forced to decide which of his loved ones lives, does his decision lead to murder of mother or child? If the mother is the victim of the crime of rape or incest, does the decision to abort constitute murder? Manslaughter? Wrongful death? Not easy questions.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- begreen
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 5:02pm
  A Child is a child no matter how one is conceded. To killed a child from rape not only violates the child but violates the women again.
  
  Report this comment
- The Third Archon
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 5:28pm
  Even if we (by which I mean the pro-choice and pro-life factions) could come to an agreement about when PERSONHOOD (“life” is a red herring–sperm and ovum are alive, yet we don’t call it mass murder when a man masturbates; bacteria are alive, but we have no moral compunctions about using antibiotics or antibacterial sanitizer) begins, and we clearly cannot, there is still yet the issue to be resolved as to why the fetus’ right to exist categorically and in and of itself, gives the fetus a right to DEMAND the use of the pregnant woman’s bodily resources and vitiate the woman’s right to bodily autonomy. The philosophical dilemma that conservatives rarely if ever acknowledge is that even IF/WHEN we’ve established the fetus now counts as person, there are now TWO persons involved in the moral calculus whose rights NECESSARILY trade-off and whose interests must be balanced against one another, whereas prior to the fetus attaining personhood, the calculus involves just one person, the pregnant woman, ANOTHER fact conservatives rarely acknowledge. Perhaps this REFUSAL to even ACKNOWLEDGE the EXISTENCE and PERSONHOOD (and rights therefrom) of the pregnant WOMAN is why there is a common sentiment among many that conservative policy is hostile, in at least one respect, to women (and might explain why women are more frequently Democrat than men on average).
  
  Report this comment
- begreen
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 5:59pm
  The Third Archon
  
  Ua what? Don’t leave out the concept that all life comes from God.The question remains when does place a soul in a body?
  
  Some of the world’s most prominent scientists and physicians testified to a U.S. Senate committee that human life begins at conception:
  
  A United States Senate Judiciary Subcommittee invited experts to testify on the question of when life begins. All of the quotes from the following experts come directly from the official government record of their testimony.1
  
  Dr. Alfred M. Bongiovanni, professor of pediatrics and obstetrics at the University of Pennsylvania, stated:
  
  “I have learned from my earliest medical education that human life begins at the time of conception…. I submit that human life is present throughout this entire sequence from conception to adulthood and that any interruption at any point throughout this time constitutes a termination of human life
  
  Report this comment
- Wyld_goose
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 6:42pm
  97% of abortion facilities provide abortion at eight weeks, and 86% provide services at 12 weeks, but provision drops off steeply after that, with only 13% of providers offering services at 24 weeks.
  
  That said, brainwaves are detected as early as 6 weeks gestation.
  
  Report this comment
- LivingInGodsGrace
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 10:12pm
  The Third Archon
  
  Gobblydee **** is what you are speaking. Sperm alone maybe be “living” but they are not a human being. When I say “life”, I mean life. “Personhood” is another cop-out. If the parents are human, it is from the beginning, a human being. If it’s growing, it’s alive. All the DNA at conception is the same as at 9 mths. There is only a matter of size, environment, and dependency.
  
  Who currently living has been given the job of defining “personhood” for the unborn? This slippery slope is leading to what Paul Krugman is now calling for, Death panels. God help us.
  
  #55MillionNoBigDeal to Democrats and Pro-Death people.
  
  Report this comment
- mm_vcdl
  Posted on February 7, 2013 at 4:24pm
  Archon – It’s not calculus, and is far simpler than you make it out. The conservative view is this: Life is sacred above all else. It is the first principle, and trumps all others. Philosophizing about the fetus’ right to “DEMAND the use of the pregnant woman’s bodily resources,” etc. requires the setting aside of the first principle. In almost all cases, the woman is responsible for putting the child in her womb. Even if she is not, refer back to the first principle.
  
  Report this comment
RestoreCapitalism
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 3:53pm
Pro life advocates are honest in telling people they should choose life. But the pro abortion advocates aren’t honest enough to say that what they really mean is ‘choose death’. Here’s a statistic for you: Ten out of ten babies surveyed choose life.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Balpit
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 5:17pm
  They’re also not honest in saying even though they’re “pro-choice”, they have no problem with China’s forced abortions. Even though they go against the expectant parents’ choice to keep the unborn baby.
  
  Report this comment
- The Third Archon
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 5:29pm
  “They’re also not honest in saying even though they’re “pro-choice”, they have no problem with China’s forced abortions.”
  Citation?
  
  Report this comment
- Balpit
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 5:47pm
  @ Third Archon
  
  When the story first broke:
  - Pro-Choice (abortion) groups like NARAL, Planned Parenthood, Emily’s Group have not reported it, much less protested it.
  - There were no press releases from any Pro-Choice orgs.
  - The only Pro-Choicer who said anything about it was “Jill” from Feministe. In fact, she TRASHED those who criticized it. Even though the abortion was FORCED, she chided those who said the baby should have been adopted, rather than aborted.
  
  Report this comment
ihasa
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 3:13pm
Girls for Change being *partially* founded by Planned Parenthood doesn’t mean it is pro-abortion (and it doesn’t seem to be if you check out the site) nor is Planned Parenthood solely concerned with abortion (you could say that increasing uptake of contraception is probably the most effective way of reducing abortion that there is)…. And certainly I am sure Huggies didn’t support Girls for Change because it ‘advocates killing in the name of choice’…

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- zorro
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 3:43pm
  LOL…PP is plenty concerned with abortion when a large percentage of their revenue comes from the money they make killing children.
  
  Report this comment
- begreen
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 5:05pm
  For PP it’s all about abortions that blood money for their pocket.
  
  Report this comment
Selftrack
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 1:49pm
I have, for years, thought this argument is framed incorrectly. “Choice” is a verb which represents an action! The argument should be Pro Death or Pro Life. Choice is simply the action one takes to arrive on one side of the argument or the other. If Pro Choice advocates were addressed by their proper title, Pro Death, perhaps the argument might sway further to the side of Life!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- P8TR10T
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 3:07pm
  That’s what liberals do… they hijack words and phrases like, “Pro-Freedom” and “Pro-Choice” and “Liberty” etc. and then use them as though that is what they are fighting for, when in reality it is almost always the opposite.
  
  Report this comment
- USAMama
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 3:35pm
  I refuse to say “pro-choice” I refer to them as “pro-abortion” because that’s what they are. They are only “pro-choice” and support your “choice” if you choose abortion. If you “choose” life or you “choose” to give your child up for adoption they will not support that “choice”. They don’t really believe in a woman’s right to choose or they would be for educating women and empowering them with ALL the facts, they would support sonograms before making their decision. But they don’t, they only support things that would encourage the women to choose abortion.
  
  In reality they are pro-abortion and anti-choice.
  
  Report this comment
- begreen
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 6:04pm
  Selftrack
  
  Excellant point on the verb choice.
  
  Report this comment
Ghandi was a Republican
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 1:27pm
Option 1. Don’t have sex the 3 or 4 days the egg can be fertilized.
Option 2. Add contraceptive +/- 3 days.
Option 3. Isn’t one because 99.999% you will never conceive. For that .001% – have the child for a couple that cannot have one. Is that really too much?

Option 4. Get rid of PP and sue everyone who ever profited from that incompetent scam into oblivion for graft, corruption and fraud. 50 million dead babies can’t be wrong..

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
nonofmybiznez
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 12:29pm
We need to offer options other than abortion to those girls that find themselves in similar situations. They need to know its okay to give birth, let someone adopt the baby or raise the child on their own. Most everyone I know who has found themselves a single mother, found the change challenging, life changing and life affirming. The best thing that could have ever happened to them. They can’t believe they love someone more than themselves. Not everyone views a fetus as a blob.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Wyld_goose
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 12:52pm
  The wait for the adoption of a newborn is years….I’m just saying.
  
  Report this comment
- Kalshion
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 7:03pm
  @Wyld_goose
  
  Incorrect, majority of newborn children are adopted only days after they are born, some on the very day they are born. The actual time it takes for a child to be adopted however goes up the older they get, in fact, our orphanages have more children ages twelve and above than they do below that age.
  
  Report this comment
- 3monkeysmomma
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 9:59pm
  @ Kal
  What wild goose is saying is that it takes prospective PARENTS years of waiting to adopt a newborn.
  
  Report this comment
- Wyld_goose
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 11:13pm
  thanks 3MONKEYSMOMMA, that is what I meant.
  
  Report this comment
smwk
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 11:32am
if life officially ends when your heart stops beating, doesn’t it begin when your heart starts beating?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Wyld_goose
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 12:51pm
  Actually I do believe the clinical definition of death is the absence of brainwaves. A fetus has detectable brainwaves way before it’s heart beats for the first time and well within the time table that a woman would first detect that she’s even pregnant to then “choose” to commit state sanctioned murder.
  
  Report this comment
- LETSBEABOUTIT
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 12:52pm
  No. A person starts with a single cell. Proof of life occurs when that cell duplicates itself the first time. Consciousness and heart beat are still months away but my opinion is that proof of life comes with the first replication at the cellular level.
  
  Report this comment
- TH30PH1LUS
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 2:41pm
  Scientists rush to the press whenever they claim to find some fossilized single cell organism, or even just a shred of a hint of something like that on Mars or in a meteor… THEY CALL IT LIFE. http://www.space.com/801-exclusive-nasa-researchers-claim-evidence-present-life-mars.html
  
  But if it’s inside a human female womb….
  
  Report this comment
- Connie_D
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 4:25pm
  Both sides on the abortion issue are exactly wrong. It’s our brain that makes us human. Just as the death of our brain means that we’re dead, so should the birth of our brain make us alive, and that happens at the end of the first trimester, when the brain stem and brain are fully connected. Then you have a human being, who feels pain, and suffers when aborted.
  
  Report this comment
- begreen
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 5:51pm
  Jeremiah 1:5 “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart;
  
  By this don’t prioritize any emphasize on the physical but on the soul which is not based on the physical. thus neither brain waves nor a heart beat makes any different.
  
  Report this comment
RDavis49
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 11:16am
What …. Wyld_goose …. said is pretty enlightening, or should at the very least trigger some form of common sense thought in Pro-Choice advocates. If NASA found even a drop of water with a living organism in it on Mars, it would be proclaimed around the world that LIFE exist on Mars.. But, the conception of a human being in the womb of a woman, living cells and organisms of HUMAN LIFE is considered to be no life at all by Pro-Choice advocates and is therefore discounted as being a living, growing human being. How can they give applause to one form of life and support the destruction of the very form of life from which they themselves came? Do I smell the stench of hypocricy in that line of thinking?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- toto
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 12:14pm
  Always find it interesting that Pro Choice is really a means to chose death.
  
  Report this comment
John Valentine
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 10:18am
The man makes a common mistake. The milliones of fathers who make the same mistake, there’s a baby growing in your stomach, I think, will let it pass.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- CathyvanDyke
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 11:37am
  Me too!
  
  The PC may force Huggies to pull the ad but … the internet implies that the ad will not go away.
  
  Report this comment
NewCreationDave
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 9:47am
Talk is cheap. Watch what they do, not what they say. Just sayin …

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- zorro
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 10:13am
  No, no, no. This is all wrong. This is a “baby” because it’s “wanted.” You can see it clearly in the commercial. If it’s not wanted, then it’s not a “real” baby. Duh…
  
  Report this comment
Wyld_goose
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 9:40am
Remember, a single celled organism found on Mars would be considered life. Any pro-death advocate should have to hold a fetus in their hands, or worse, stand in the room watching a partial birth abortion when the baby begins to cry moments before the head is crushed. I’ve lost my ability to debate the likes of people that just dismiss this anymore.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- RDavis49
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 10:45am
  ABSOLUTELY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If a pro-choice person ever personally witnessed with their own eyes the cruelty and horrors of an abortion against an innocent baby, they would be converted to pro-life in a baby’s heartbeat… assuming of course they had any kind of a human heart with any compassion at all.
  
  Report this comment
- Cavallo
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 2:05pm
  Also remember that our Dear Leader advocated for the murder of the child even if it lived through all that and was outside the woman’s body. It’s sick, twisted, and macabre infanticide.
  
  Report this comment
- The Third Archon
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 5:17pm
  “Remember, a single celled organism found on Mars would be considered life.”
  Yes–bacteria is considered “life” by the biological definition. Bacteria ALSO is something we have no moral compunction whatsoever about killing (vis-a-vis ALL of modern medicine and sanitation). The problem is the sloppy equivocation of pro-lifers who use the term “life” when what they REALLY mean is “personhood.” CLEARLY, NO ONE, except perhaps the most devout Buddhist, believes and acts as if ALL life in its many many many forms is morally equivalent. The first threshold question then, is at what point, if ever, is the living fetus a PERSON, capable of having rights as such? By implicitly recognizing that the single-celled “life” we might find on Mars is comparable to the early (embryonic) stages of the fetus you prove one of the very points of the pro-choice position–that while LIFE begins at conception, the MORALLY salient status of PERSONHOOD does NOT, and IS not present AT LEAST through the embryonic stage of fetal development.
  
  Report this comment
- begreen
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 6:30pm
  The Third Archon
  I am no more prepared to say that these early stages [of development in the womb] represent an incomplete human being than I would be to say that the child prior to the dramatic effects of puberty…is not a human being. This is human life at every stage.”
  
  Dr. Jerome LeJeune, professor of genetics at the University of Descartes in Paris, was the discoverer of the chromosome pattern of Down syndrome. Dr. LeJeune testified to the Judiciary Subcommittee, “after fertilization has taken place a new human being has come into being.” He stated that this “is no longer a matter of taste or opinion,” and “not a metaphysical contention, it is plain experimental evidence.” He added, “Each individual has a very neat beginning, at conception.”
  
  Professor Hymie Gordon, Mayo Clinic: “By all the criteria of modern molecular biology, life is present from the moment of conception.”
  Professor Micheline Matthews-Roth, Harvard University Medical School: “It is incorrect to say that biological data cannot be decisive…. It is scientifically correct to say that an individual human life begins at conception…. Our laws, one function of which is to help preserve the lives of our people, should be based on accurate scientific data.”
  
  Report this comment
- begreen
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 6:45pm
  The Third Archon
  
  All living things have souls, and all human beings have spiritual, rational souls made in the image and likeness of God. If a human being is conceived then that person has a spiritual, rational soul.
  
  Report this comment
americandescartes
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 9:37am
Actually, only an idiot would claim that an embryo is not human life. However, the liberal baby-killers out there that half even half a brain do not claim it is not life. They claim it is not a person, with the rights of personhood. Any biologist can tell you it’s human life. The issue is a philosophical one of when that human life “gets” to be a person, with all the inherent rights that go along with that. Taken in this light, the commercial says nothing that no one (or, no one who counts) already knows. For all we know, Huggies believes, correctly, that it is a human life… but that Huggies also believes it is not a person, and therefore can be murdered, er, “disposed of” at any time.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
tzion
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 9:28am
The first time I saw this someone in the room said “The baby doesn’t grow in the stomach.” While technically true, it seemed a little off topic.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Gonzo
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 9:45am
  ..and yours is on topic?
  
  Report this comment
The Third Archon
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 9:26am
“HAVE YOU SEEN THE HUGGIES COMMERCIAL THAT APPEARS TO BE PRO-LIFE? BUT THERE’S A CATCH”
Of COURSE Huggies is “pro-life”–they sell DIAPERS you simpletons! For them, more babies = MO’ MON-EH!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- DeavonReye
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 10:43am
  Gah. . . . you beat me to it.
  
  Report this comment
- RDavis49
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 10:55am
  All I ever see coming from is where you constantly insult and try to put other people down to try and make yourself look like you’re smart and have all the answers. But, you know what? Your comments look foolish, disrespectful of others, insecure and immature. Might want to do a little self evaluation on your personality.
  
  Report this comment
- DeavonReye
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 11:14am
  Just as an FYI, . . . what he beat me to was the fact that Huggies works to sell more diapers. It would be absurd for them to have a commercial that showed the couple seriously considering an abortion.
  
  Report this comment
- RDavis49
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 11:24am
  @DeavonReye….. I understand. My comment was directed to ARCHON and his calling people simpletons and the likes. That’s the trait of a person who is extremely insecure about themself and must compensate for it by putting others down and calling them names.
  
  Report this comment
- The Third Archon
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 5:07pm
  @RD
  It is incredibly naive to think Huggies has any interest other than purely economic when it releases an ADVERTISEMENT.
  
  Also, there is a time and a place for mockery, and that time and place is where people do something deserving of mockery. If you are acting stupid or saying stupid things, I’m going to call you on your ****–no one benefits when we ignore ******** instead of calling it out, and in some instances people aren’t mature to engage in critical self-introspection and handle harsh criticism, justified or no. Those kind of people, who don’t respond to anything else, need to be shamed and deserve to be shamed–for some people, that’s the ONLY way they will ever realize their behavior is unacceptable. So if that’s you, then suck it up–and if it’s not, then you have no reason to be offended.
  
  Report this comment
buckeyetater
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 9:05am
Good commercial. I would bet that when the leftist groups approach Huggies “Planned Parenthood” that their people sell themselves as an organization that is all for “The Mothers Health” and just wanting to do right for women. Promoting pre-natal care and all the other great things they do for expecting Moms. They don’t tell the truth in fund raising. Just like any other leftist “the ends justify the means” slithering sleazy snake groups they are.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- americansfightingforcommonsense
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 9:15am
  Yep! or as Rush would say…Right on, right on, right on…
  
  Report this comment
tajloc
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 9:01am
Just watch the ad and react.
NICE!
What kills note blacks in Chicago guns or abortions
Yeah we are still racist all right.
Wake up America

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
AntiLiberal74
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 8:45am
Not surprised there isn’t a brown-skinned family in the ad considering the ties to the racist Planned Parenthood…

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
momrules
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 8:37am
Yep, it’s a human being growing there. A HUMAN being growing there. This commercial will be yanked from the airways quickly.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- CathyvanDyke
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 11:12am
  momrules
  
  I also have a feeling that Huggies will bow and pull the ad.
  .
  However … whether intention or not … I do rejoice that a company that has conformed behind the scenes to the PC agenda of the pro-choice movement has revealed exactly what the fly on the wall observes between ALL couples … pro-life or pro-choice … when the baby is “wanted”. In other words … a “potential” human being is never the issue.
  
  Report this comment
ADNIL
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 8:31am
How nice. But I wouldn’t expect otherwise. After all, those are little customers in there.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
SurroundedinNH
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 8:30am
Slow news day Blaze?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- The-Monk
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 9:04am
  SurroundedinNH
  
  It was enough to gather your attention….
  
  So what does that say about you?
  
  Report this comment
- jungle J
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 9:05am
  reality bores progressives.
  
  Report this comment
- buckeyetater
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 9:12am
  Ya know if you don’t like a story then just move on to something else! Just because every story isn’t your cup of tea doesn’t mean that everyone shares your opinion. You just wasted more of your precious time whining about how the story wastes your time. That goes for the rest of you that whine about stories all the time.
  
  Report this comment
Eastinfection
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 8:30am
“Honey, we’re pregnant. We’re pregnant!,” she yells.

“You’re going to be an (aborter)!…there’s a little (personal property) in there,” the husband proclaims.” There’s (personal property) growing inside your stomach!”

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Smokey_Bojangles
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 8:58am
  There is a mass of cells growing in there! Do you have a tumor? Or are you having a mistake?
  
  Report this comment
- MCON29
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 9:24am
  On my way home from work tonight I’m going to swing by the clinic and get this abscess removed.
  
  Report this comment
- 3monkeysmomma
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 10:04pm
  “Honey, we are about to be PUNISHED with a baby!”
  
  Report this comment
Gonzo
Posted on February 6, 2013 at 8:22am
” There’s a human being growing inside your stomach.” The guy is certainly not a gynecologist.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- momrules
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 8:44am
  I wonder how many caught that.
  
  Report this comment
- Pium Vir
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 9:03am
  Well there are ::::AHEM:::: more than one way in….
  
  Report this comment
- yanki161
  Posted on February 6, 2013 at 1:35pm
  You beat me to it. She has a very serious problem if that baby is in her stomach. lol
  
  Report this comment

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.