Back to The Blaze »

Comments (3)

• Arc

  Posted on February 14, 2013 at 11:47am

  1. Precisely what was Ambassador Stevens doing in Benghazi.?
  2. How many other consulates around the world have Annexes and what are they used for.?
  3. Is PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY a forthcoming excuse to be used by Obama ?
  4. Will all men of good conscience come forward and represent the US citizens in getting to the truth?
  5. If an Aircraft Carrier can have an Alert 5 aircraft sitting on deck to guard the ship, why can’t the State Dept request SOMETHING to guard the consulates?
  6. Could there have been a Mideast version of ” Fast & Furious ” in progress?
  7. Has anyone been able to interview the surviving consulate employees?
  Food for thought.

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

  • Xylliab_of_the_Znarghh

    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:26pm

    1. None of your business.
    2. None of your business.
    3. He doesn’t need plausible deniability because he has not been plausibly accused of anything.
    4. No.
    5. They can, but since many embassies and consulates routinely request more security, it is often difficult to accurately guess which ones really need it most.
    6. Doubtful, it was probably just a straightforward gun running operation intended only to put weapons in the hands of people that we wish to arm.
    7. Yeah, somebody will have talked to them and determined that you don’t need to know what they said.

    Report this comment

     

• Xylliab_of_the_Znarghh

  Posted on February 13, 2013 at 3:17pm

  No, no there is not any shocking new information. This is just a desperate ploy to keep the stooges in the feedback zone agitated about the failed attempt to manufacture some kind of scandal out of the sad events at Benghazi long after all the normal people out here in the real world have moved on.

  Report this comment

  Log in to ReplyReply  

« Back to The Blaze