Developing: Pakistani Plane Escorted by UK Fighter Jets — 2 Men Arrested
Doc Thompson’s 24-hour radio marathon, ‘#24forok,’ continues until 9 am ET — Listen Live!
Missouri Dems Introduce Alarming Gun Confiscation Bill Giving Law-Abiding Gun Owners 90 Days to Turn in Certain Firearms or Become Felons
Credit: AP
Democrats in Missouri introduced startling anti-gun legislation that would require gun owners to hand over their legally purchased so-called “assault weapons” to “the appropriate law enforcement agency for destruction” within 90 days.
Under the proposed bill, “Any person who, prior to the effective date of this law, was legally in possession of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine shall have ninety days from such effective date to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution.”
Here are some additional provisions found in the gun control bill:
(1) Remove the assault weapon or large capacity magazine from the state of Missouri;
(2) Render the assault weapon permanently inoperable; or
(3) Surrender the assault weapon or large capacity magazine to the appropriate law enforcement agency for destruction, subject to specific agency regulations.
[..]
5. Unlawful manufacture, import, possession, purchase, sale, or transfer of an assault weapon or a large capacity magazine is a class C felony.
So essentially the law would turn a law-abiding gun owner today, into a felon tomorrow.
State Reps. Rory Ellinger (D-86) and Jill Schupp (D-88) reportedly introduced the anti-gun legislation, House Bill 545, this week.
Gun confiscation is being talked about more and more by lawmakers as a means to get so-called “assault weapons,” which are really semi-automatic rifles, off the streets. Democrats in California last week also proposed legislation that called for the potential confiscation of the state’s 166,000 legally purchased semi-automatic rifles.
California Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) defended the massive gun control package, saying “we can save lives.”
(H/T: Gateway Pundit)
In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.
Popular Stories
John McCain Lectures Tea Party Senator on How ‘Business’ Gets Done in Congress: ‘That’s What We’ve Been Doing for a Couple Hundred Years’ 565 Comments
Boy Scouts of America Vote to Allow Gay Members 509 Comments
Pope Francis’ Sermon Sparks Debate: ‘Even the Atheists’ Have Been Redeemed ‘With the Blood of Christ’ 488 Comments
Obama Doesn’t Return Marine’s Salute, Shakes Hand Instead — Is This a Protocol Misstep? 349 Comments
Piers Morgan Bans Dana Loesch From His Show Following Twitter Spat: ‘Show Some Bloody Respect’ 334 Comments
Faith
-
Game-Changing Bombshell? There’s a Major Twist in the Story About a High School Student’s Lesbian Relationship With a Minor
257 Comments
- Is the Boy Scouts’ Gay Amendment the ‘Beginning of the End’ for the Group? (Plus: Tell Us Where You Stand) 241 Comments
-
MSNBC Hosts Martin Bashir and Chris Hayes Claim London Machete Killers Aren’t Terrorists: ‘These Are Just Murderers’
143 Comments
-
Did You Catch the Possibly Policy-Changing Ft. Hood Reference in Obama’s Terror Speech?
Read More
-
Dem. Rep. Apologizes for Attending ‘Racist, Anti-Semitic and Homophobic’ Speech
Read More
Business
-
Have You Had Scotch at a NJ TGI Friday’s Lately? You Might Have Been Drinking Rubbing Alcohol
Read More
-
Venezuelan President Blames Toilet Paper Shortage on the Rich
Read More
-
This Terrible Chart Shows the Change in Food Stamp Participation Over the Last 10 Years
Read More
- Disney Makes Absolutely Mortifying Photoshop Mistake Read More
-
Trey Gowdy at It Again — This Time with a Jack Bauer Reference!
117 Comments
Technology
-
Lion Named ‘Bonedigger’ and Small Dog Make Most Unlikely Companions
Read More
-
Rocket Bike Sets Land Speed Record — and Uses a Fuel You Wouldn’t Expect
Read More
-
How 3D Printing Technology Created a Special Part for Baby’s Windpipe and Saved His Life
Read More
-
6 Fascinating Spy Gadgets You’ll Probably Want (and Can Have) After Seeing
Read More
-
How Would a 3D-Printed Shotgun Slug Hold Up? Here’s the Test
Read More
Submitting your tip... please wait!
Comments (574)
LETSBEABOUTIT
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:11pmThe story would have been more complete with 5 minutes of research on the current makeup of the Missouri house. Republican controlled, btw. I doubt this will even come to a vote.
Report this comment
Trigus
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:27pmRight to keep and bear arms–exception.
Section 23. That the right of every citizen to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person and property, or when lawfully summoned in aid of the civil power, shall not be questioned; but this shall not justify the wearing of concealed weapons.
Report this comment
Trigus
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:28pmthat ws from Missouri State Constitution Article 1 bill of rights:
Report this comment
colascguy
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:30pmIt does not matter if it comes to vote. When people pull back their mask everyone should look. Everyone across the US should look at the body of information from NY CA and MI and know that Democrats want to take away the right of US gun ownership.
Report this comment
Cavallo
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:31pmI want it up for a vote. I want it on record who voted for it.
knowurhistory
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:33pmThats not the point. The point is that the progressives are proposing this sort of legislation and its just a matter of time before something like this passes in a blue state.
Report this comment
redfish52
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:33pmWhat is funny is that even if they could get it past they actually think anyone would pay attention to it. See that’s the thing with Progressive Liberal’s….they think they are always the smartest people in the room. What happens after 90 days….hmmmm. Maybe teachers asking young students something like…does your daddy have one of those bad guns that kill little children in your home….good girl…you get a lollypop.
Report this comment
Ira McBiff
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:35pmyou are right we have a super veto proof majority here in Missouri,we can pass law without the govenors signature,,the discusting thing these democrat liberals are doing is rallying there liberal base to keep them in a job when the mid terms elections begin in 2014,,all they are doing is marketing a bunch of dead kids to get more votes and that all ,,they are discusting and it will cost more of them thier jobs next year.Missouri overrode Jay Nixons veto to regain our right to carry a gun and it also eliminated hand gun permits,,its cash and carry here in Missouri now on hand guns.
Report this comment
JONVIL
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:39pmOne can only hope.
Many so called ‘Republicans’ aren’t.
Report this comment
SquidVetOhio
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:43pmThe GOP in the state should pass it. Seriously. It would cause SCOTUS to hear it immediately due to the chaos it would cause. Then we would get a definitive pro 2nd amendment ruling forever. I say call their bluff and pass it.
Cavallo
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:44pmIn retribution the Missouri Legislature should pass a no restriction bill. Legalize machine guns (yes real ones) as long as they are made, and purchased by Missouri Citizens, and are not transported outside the State.
Report this comment
kaydeebeau
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:47pmTrigus – that then means that you can open carry – I can walk around with it strapped to my hip as long as it is clearly and always visible – I just can’t keep it in my purse., tucked in my waist under my blouse or on my ankle underneath my pants leg
Report this comment
SacredHonor1776
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:53pm‘The GOP in the state should pass it. Seriously. It would cause SCOTUS to hear it immediately due to the chaos it would cause. Then we would get a definitive pro 2nd amendment ruling forever. I say call their bluff and pass it.”
…and you trust Dread Pirate Roberts to side in favor of the 2nd amendment?
Report this comment
Shrugged
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:55pmIt doesn’t matter. These Dems are showing their intent. If/when the balance changes, this is what we can expect so fight it now and keep the majority of the public on the side of the 2nd amendment. We’ve had 4 years of ignoring things and look where its gotten us.
Report this comment
sillyfreshness
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:58pmGotta love the Democratic (communist) Party.
Report this comment
Farmhand82
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:03pmThis is just politics. They know crap like this will never pass and if it did, it would get kicked in the ass almost immediately in the courts for being unconstitutional. I would argue the Feinstein national bill is much the same. They can’t even get it to pass in the Senate, much less the house. The point is to get Republicans to vote against semi automatic rifles bans so that next shooting which will inevitably occur, Democrats can dance on the corpses of the victims to score cheap political points and say “see see?! Republicans want children to die! If only we had a ban on guns!”
Report this comment
ginger100
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:12pmWhy don’t we see laws that have illegal aliens turn themselves in within 90 days for deportation. It is our right to keep and bear arms, we are not criminals, but they would like us to be.
Report this comment
KevINtampa
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:21pmHow many more Aurora or Sandy Hook incidents do you think it’ll take before legislation like this will not only be brought up for a vote, but passed, even if just barely, into law?
Fact is, I think these incidents are reasons to have a better and more armed citizenry, but that isn’t going to be the discussion most people hear. When this happens again, and it will because it will always happen again regardless of ANYTHING we do, all of the politicians will be saying it is the conservative right’s fault, and many on the right will begin to concede. It’s only a matter of time.
Actions and proposals like the one in this article is so that these dbags can hold over people’s heads later and say we told you so and blame the killings on the representatives who voted legislation like this down.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:23pm“Thats not the point. The point is that the progressives are proposing this sort of legislation and its just a matter of time before something like this passes in a blue state.”
Exactly, the people won’t be safe until the Democrat Party & its’ philosophies are dumped into the dusbin of history.
Report this comment
DYNA
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:25pmTo all of you who think the liberals are doing this just to gain political points with whomever,
WAKE UP! THINK about IT!
The arrogance of those in office who even think that they can tell you what to do while confiscating your property in the process. You are already law abiding citizens.
It is the liberals who are breaking the law!
Report this comment
henryKnox
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:28pmWhy is it that only Republicans are concerned with the Constitution? I think the answer is that the Democrat party has been highjacked by Socialist Extremists.
Report this comment
AINT_SKEERT
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:35pmDon,t just stand there Missourans’, get those recall petitions going!
Report this comment
huufarted
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:37pmI couldn’t help but notice that all the people pushing this agenda of Gun Control seem to be Jewish…
Report this comment
Mike Benton
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:47pmAnd then there is that pesky US Constitution:
2nd Amendment….shall not be infringed….
4th Amendment….shall not take property…
5th Amendment….shall not incriminate self….
Section 9. “Powers denied to the Federal Government (and logically to the States); ….note item c. “No bill of attainder or ex post facto law shall be passed.”
My gun is my property. It was legal when I bought it so it is still legal.
Report this comment
jcldwl
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:48pmWe have no gun registration in Missouri how will they know who has them?
Report this comment
mecanic
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:57pmCalifornia Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) defended the massive gun control package, saying “we can save lives.”…..no what there going to do is start a civil war.
Report this comment
mikem1969
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:01pmResist Tyranny Loudly.
Do not comply with unconstitutional laws not matter the cost
When the next shot heard round the world is fired I WILL STAND ON THE LINE WITH MY BROTHERS AND SISTERS.
Report this comment
Trigus
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:11pmEvery State except: California, Iowa, Maryland, Minnesota, new jersey, and new York have a section under Bill of Rights in their State Constitution: Right to Bear Arms – most go further then the USC 2nd Amendment by clarifying our right to Bear Arms to Protect Ourselves.
Now, any legislation that infringes on your Rights Granted by your State Constitution must be put to a vote of the people to amend the article and section of the State Constitution. Any elected official who votes a “YEA” for a law that infringes on your Rights Granted to you by your State Constitution can be charged with Perjury, not Treason.
the problem I find is that a lot of people do not know the Rights Granted to them on a State Level. Please, look up your State Constitution and contact your local representative. Remind him that he represents his constituents and not the democratic party.
Report this comment
Yeah_Buddy
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:12pmImma going home and hug my AR tonight for V-day. I’ll feel up my 9mm too so she don’t get jealous.
Report this comment
MetalPatriot
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:14pmCan’t somebody find where these people live and help change their views? The system is overwhelming packed with this mindset. No legal means is ever going to repair this country.
Report this comment
old blacksmith
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 7:03pm@buddy
happiness is a warm gun….
I can’t even listen to oldies anymore. now I know John Lennon was pushing progressive propaganda, Joni Mitchell killed 65,000,000 Africans bye banning DDT, Cat Stevens is a Muslim…. it’s really killed a lot of the joy in those memories.
Report this comment
MDECKER
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 7:13pmThe Democrats proposing this Bill should personally, go door-to-door, to colllect said firearms.
Report this comment
Capt_Gregg
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 7:28pmIt’s the old strategy of haggling — start by asking for twice what you’re willing to settle for. The libs will keep introducing draconian bills in hopes that they can get a less restrictive bill through in the name of “compromise.”
Report this comment
ElDeVerde
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 7:29pm@letsbeaboutit- Whether or not it comes to a vote. The mere fact that crap like this gets any traction in this country is very chilling if you care about liberty and individual rights. A lot of “pro-second amendment” blow hards will fall in line just like the koolaid drinkers. The way you give these tyrants your gun is one bullet at a time, period.
Report this comment
Wiley41
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 7:43pmTo those who say this is moot since currently MO legislature is R,…
The point is not to pass this bill today. Rather this is a common long game information operations strategy to slowly shift the barriers, offer the seemingly absurd now so ‘less absurd’ restrictions seem more ‘reasonable’ and then over time the constant slow beat in the background makes the ridiculous seem an option.
E.g. Homosexual marriage, legalized drugs, cradle to grave welfare, institutionalize racism against us evil white men,…
Report this comment
Blindtimes
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 8:00pmJust having them Socialist talk that way is not the country I remember as a younger man. They must be shut down.
Report this comment
turkey13
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 8:08pmEveryone reading this that was going to Branson in the next few months call and cancel your reservations like I just did. We were going mid March and then I was to reserve for mid April. Those folks asked me why and I told them that if they were going to elect idiots like this I needed to spend my money elsewhere. We decided to go to San Antonio next month and the visit all the museums in Tulsa + The Phillips museum in April.
Report this comment
bonesiii
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 8:56pmHas anyone else noticed this is the liberal game lately — assure us that things will never go very far down the road of corruption? Almost every liberal post on here lately defending liberalism runs along those lines.
Then something happens, taking us farther down that road in violation of what they said last time would never happen… and the game shifts so now the NEXT horrible thing is what they assure us will never happen. You’re crazy for even imagining it could ever happen! So they say. Then it goes and happens and they never seem to notice…
Report this comment
FlamingFartSyndrome
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 8:58pmThe only people who will care about this be those who study how the US fell in history class 50 years from now.
Report this comment
Dan
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 9:02pmIt happened in Australia and England watch video below for evidence that it can happen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoV7TgAXKO8
Dan
Report this comment
Gorp
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 9:16pmI guess I’d be a felon then. SCREW EM!
Report this comment
1947
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 9:23pmThe reason this is coming up is because of East St. Louis…..
Report this comment
Live_Free_orDie
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 9:46pmHahahahaaahaaahahahahahhhaaaa I’ve been saying this since Senator Frankenfeinstein said she would sponsor another assault bill. “The Debate is Over”!!! Who the hell are you to push your BS ideas on us??? This is a democracy…so be the first through the door and we’ll show how we voted!
μολὼν λαβέ
Report this comment
Grey Eagle
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 9:47pmI have a lot of family in MO. This will really piss them off. These two Democrats were not very smart bringing this nonsense up for a vote. Keep count of who votes for this bill. Should make the midterms very interesting there.
Report this comment
RIDEMODELS
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 10:00pmHow very very nice……Turn legal gun owners and many who have fought for Freedom for this country into Felons…….While they let drug dealers and criminals run free in the streets, while they kill inocent little girls in Chicago……Nice….!!
Report this comment
YOURSENSEI
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 10:18pmThis is what you must know:
From your warm live hands.
It is so.
hotwater
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 11:05pmYour comments are very true, for the most part Missouri is very conservative (Republican), but we do have a couple of wack-a-do’s in in administration. This starts with Jay Nixon our democrat governor, who talks like he’s in the middle but pushes hard to the left, and proceeds to other state offices and a lot of democratic representation from K.C. and St. Louis. This bill won’t go anywhere but apparently the sponsors are thinking they’ll get brownie point from someone (most like Obama and his cronies).
Report this comment
civilwarcometh
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 11:16pmhttp://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/guns-and-ammo-production-maxed-out-this-is-a-society-preparing-for-war_02142013
Report this comment
joan k
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 11:18pmIt has already happened in NY…. and will be coming to a state near you!
Report this comment
Techcon
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 11:20pm@your-sheep-puffer
@wrongo = a bar of soap that “talks.”
Pathetic.
Report this comment
muffythetuffy
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 12:16amTHERE ARE GOING TO BE A LOT OF DEAD FELONS
A lot of innocent law enforcement people and innocent Americans will get killed over this. We know what we are up against, freedom has never been free. That Democrat will not be in the lines when the shooting begins. Two nations without an air force or navy did a pretty good job shoving the US Army’s face in the sand.
Report this comment
muffythetuffy
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 12:29amIT APPEARS MANY OF US MAY NOT BE AROUND THIS TIME NEXT YEAR
1. Start having early birthday parties for the family just in case.
2. Get your personal papers in order just in case.
3. Make amends with those you need to make amends with
4. Set yourself straight with the Lord.
5. Get together with you gun owner friends and selegrate a mass funeral just in case.
6. Start to live everyday as if its your last, just in case.
Remember we did not start this, its not our fault.
Report this comment
banjarmon
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 12:47amRepealing the second amendment doesn’t repeal it!!!
http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/02/repealing-the-second-amendment-doesnt-repeal-it/
I’m of the opinion that if any person in government breaks his oath to the Constitution Should be removed from office!!
Report this comment
paperpushermj
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 12:49amYour right but what this effort does is reinforce the facts that Democrats are the Gun Grabbing Party
Report this comment
MaltedCheese
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 1:57am@SACREDHONOR1776
How dare you sully the good name of the Dread Pirate Roberts sir! I’ll have none of it;)
Report this comment
motherboard
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 3:28am@ SacredHonor1776, I think he is, in a round about way trying to say, is look, if the SH#@ is gonna hit the fan, can we all please just stop all this and get on with it.
Report this comment
H-Rock 75
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 4:38amI think if this passed it wouldn’t get many guns even from the people who owned them legally. Even if they traced mine Fred jones in some other county bought it and here is the receipt I got signed to clear myself in case it showed up as an orphan at a crime scene.
Report this comment
dcatkin
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 6:29amThis really has nothing to do with gun, it’s a systematic destruction of our rights under the constitution. If they start with the gun they can do as they please because we can’t defend ourselves.
The here comes the destrucaion of the constitution, and then agenda 21 and the governemnt taking your house and land.
Free Our Country
Report this comment
redfish52
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 6:35amAnyone in Missou that wants to sell their “Military Style” rifles…there is a guy in SC that will give you twice what the local gun confiscators will give you.
Report this comment
Derek01
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 8:15amThat’s good to know. It’s too bad, people used to go into politics to serve their fellow man, now it seems to be THE place to go for @$$holes who want to play king, boss people around, and enrich themselves at our expense.
Report this comment
chg2012
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 8:23amJust that the DEMS are trying is sickening enough..
Don’t think for ONE min. they won’t keep chipping away at teh 2nd Amendment .. One thing liberals are is patient.. :-)!
NO American , Dem or Conservative should EVER call for this ! period..
Report this comment
WarMunger_Al
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 8:27amWhat it all boils down to is, Law abiding American gun owners are going to have to get used to being outlaws.
This is something I have been struggling with, as I have spent my life being essentially a rule follower. Now that the rules are changing and are not in alignment with common sense I am having to prepare mentally to be a breaker.
Any citizen who does not own a firearm is a slave-in-waiting. The only American Citizens are the ones that are armed and ready to defend liberty.
Report this comment
jettson
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 8:35amThis is not a true law Do not give in to this kind of crap and by all means do not give up your guns. Make them come and get them. This is what I plan to do I may go to jail or get killed but the first one that comes through my door will be dead. Whos wants to be the hero.
Report this comment
PA PATRIOT
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 8:54amMissourians
Take it from the real clingers
“then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion”
Obama April 11, 2008
When they pry it from my dead hand
Report this comment
smghvacr
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 9:01amIt is illegal for them to take action against you,
it is illegal for them to take your firearms,
this law bans anything that goes against the constitution..
file your lawsuits now tell them to stop ……
your state also has this law …
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241
Conspiracy Against Rights
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
Report this comment
DeOppressoLiber
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 9:21amWhy Missouri? Are the Progressives trying to parallel the early Missouri history, the Missouri compromise, the Dred Scott Decision. They will and they want to tie gun control to their favorite issue Race.
Look up early Missouri history, very smart of the progressives to tie gun control to their Open Wound (they do everything to keep it opened). They know IO.
Report this comment
WarMunger_Al
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 9:26amOlympic arms is refusing to service NY state agencies, hopefully the other gun manufacturers will follow suit. And may they do the same to every state that assaults the 2nd amendment.
ttp://dailycaller.com/2013/02/13/olympic-arms-inc-announces-new-york-state-sales-policy-will-no-longer-serve-first-responders/
Report this comment
Pearsontech
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 9:32amYou are missing the point. It doesn’t matter if it would come to a vote or not because the house is controlled by Republicans in Missouri. The point its to show that this is what progressives are all about doing and if you give them power it will happen. I might not happen today because there are enough republicans to stop it but what about next time if the power shifts in their favor? You can bet it will come up again and probably get rammed through that time. The article is meant to make people aware of what these people are all about. You and I may know that already but you can’t assume that everyone that comes to this site or reads that article are fully awake.
Report this comment
Thorn2455
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 10:03amMaybe this won’t pass in Missouri, but many Minnesota Democrats are pushing for the same language in our state where we have Democrats controlling both Legislative houses AND the governor’s office. So there’s a good chance this kind of law could be in affect for us and create felons out of many law-abiding, responsible people.
Report this comment
afvetfirewoman
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 10:26amre: REDFISH52
I’ll meet his offer and raise it a Franklin (LOL) Good luck Missouri.
Report this comment
horseman43
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 10:32amThis kind of anti-gun hate is bringing gun owners together as nothing else could.
Report this comment
truemedia
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 11:09amthe issue isn’t if it will come to vote. It is the fact they think this is legal and right!
Report this comment
motherboard
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 11:35amOh this will come to a vote I believe, in their next election cycle up there, when the DEMS there pay for even bringing it up. Generally speaking, I hope the Dems/Libs push really really hard on all of this between now and 14. They are on the move, and seem unstoppable. This one issue could bring their entire little party to a crashing halt. Stealing a national election for one post is a lot easier than stealing every congressional seat race in the nation.
Report this comment
DebateMe
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 11:48am@colascguy – You are right and that is exactly the point that LetsBeAboutIt missed. That the bill may or may not pass is one thing. But everyone should take careful note of where people stand on constitutional issues.
Report this comment
Unstable Phenomenon
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 12:13pmThey can’t do it anyways, there this little law called ex post facto or retroactive law. If the weapons were already purchased legally and they were legal to own they can’t pass a law stating they are illegal now. They should of already know that, but I guess progressive liberals either know or don’t care.
Report this comment
oldguy49
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 12:15pmammo up guys……..we will have to go to missouri to help protect the 2nd
Report this comment
cyhilterman
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 12:34pmEver since Obama became president we have heard more about taking our guns away than any other subject or, at least it seems that way. I don’t think anyone needs a weapon that will shoot hundreds of rounds at a time. These are meant for law and military. But we all have the right to protect ourselves and/or hunt as allowed. We all must continue to fight for our rights.
Report this comment
thefnshow
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 12:43pmrepub controlled, dem AUTHORED !!! pretty clear to me
Report this comment
old white guy
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 12:55pmthe stae of misery, cannot pass an unconstitutional law. nobady has to obey. the law maybe looked at by the supreme court but in the interim they can just say no.
Report this comment
jcldwl
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 1:18pmAll they really want at this point is to get people to accept having to register guns. Mine will never get registered.
Report this comment
John.Galt
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 1:41pmOverton window. Propose the preposterous, move the window. Keep doing it, and we end with the preposterous.
They should put it up for a vote. I want to know how many DEMONCRAPS are willing to risk the safety of themselves AND THEIR FAMILIES by voting for it… after all, us “gun nuts” are crazy and dangerous!!
Report this comment
witchrunner
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 1:41pmA couple of thoughts on this bill. The first is that it should be renamed to “THE CREATE A DUAL BETWEEN LAW ABIDING CITIZENS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT ACT.” Second thought is if this passes, then legal citizens and law enforcement are bound to get killed. After all, never since the American Revolution has the words LIVE FREE OR DIE meant more. The third thought is, when someone mentioned that the Republicans have a bulletproof majority, is to pass a law making a criminal out of anyone who represents any of the people of Missouri to vote for legislation restricting the 2nd Amendment and the people’s rights to bear arms. Oh, and make it a felony to do so with the immediate loss of their status as an elected official. That should take care of the matter. It would stop the Socialists from taking over the State of Missouri.
Report this comment
mlip
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 1:51pmNot a chance of coming up for a vote. Mid MO gun owner and business owner here. Super majority in both state house and senate in Jeff city. Please Illinois, take st Louis. And please Kansas, take Kansas city and leave the rest of us the HELL ALONE! Springfield and Joplin cancel out columbia every time. Stupid libs!
Report this comment
Bum thrower
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 1:57pmUrge all pols in MO to co-sponsor…..that way we know whom gets voted out in 2014!!
Report this comment
hortik
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 2:42pmThe article didn’t say it would pass. The shocking thing is that it was even proposed!
You may feel safe in a State with a Republican majority. But what about Amercan Citizens living in states with DEMOCRAT majorities? I think that’s the point. Democrats think the Constitution doesn’t matter… Democrats think they can get away with this ANYWHERE… even Missouri.
Report this comment
jgarret9
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 3:54pmJust read an article about the Knockout Game on WMD in St. Lewis where a gang of black athletes
play by punching a person in the face and if they don’t knockout the victim they kick and punch them
until they are out. The Mayor say this happening and the Police do nothing and will not report in the
media because of PC. To hell with PC, get these gangs off the streets and let the public know what
is happening. The people need the means to protect themselves.
Report this comment
muddy1
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 4:33pm“What part of SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” do they not understand??
Colorado’s state assembly (House of Representatives) looking today to:
1. Limit magazine capacity to 15 rounds, (Magpul has indicated they may cease operations here and set up shop elsewhere).
2. Ban concealed carry on college campus, apparently they didn’t learn from Virginia Tech. Apparently they think our Constitutional rights end when we walk onto the campus supported by tax dollars.
3. Require universal background checks for all firearm transactions.
4. A tax on gun sales, to pay for the huge number of transactions currently taking place.
Call the Colorado capitol switchboard to let your opinion be known, 303-866-2904. The Democrats control the State House, Senate, and Governor’s seat. We are screwed. Hunters and anglers combined contribute approximately 1.2 Billion dollars to the state’s economy, and 21,000 jobs. Wanna guess what will happen to those numbers if these and other infringements are enacted?
Below is a link to the Governor’s Office. It has phone, fax, and an email link directly to the Governor. I am asking each of you to POLITELY contact the Governor and point out the numbers from my comment above. ALSO, you can mention that if these actions are taken you will not feel inclined to: hunt, fish, ski, or vacation in Colorado. Nor will you feel inclined to consume products produced in Colorado, etc.
Link: http://www.colorado.gov/cs/Satellite/GovHickenlooper/CBON/125159
Report this comment
flatbroke
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 6:03pmIt better not! i am a law abiding gun owner, and i will be watching this very closely, and i will be waiting for the next election, and remember who voted for this, and they all will be out of a job.
Report this comment
angf117
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 6:20pmyea….if they made it law the **** would hit the fan QUICKLY
Report this comment
Grey Eagle
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 6:48pmIf I were these two Democratic members of the Legislature, I would not get too attached to my seat. They may be out at the midterms. MO is a pretty conservative state.
Report this comment
Josiegirl
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 8:04pmI agree. Just a little research and knowing about Mo. would keep Glenn from making an A.. of himself about Missouri on the show today. We have sheriffs and police all over the state who say they will not follow any state or federal order to confiscate guns against our Constitutional (both federal and state) rights. Further, we have a republican controlled legislature. Glenn, we were conservatives in Missouri before you ever thought of going to Texas, so don’t tell us about what is going to happen in Missouri. Only liberals and radio/tv hosts too proud to get to know us would think anyone can confiscate our guns. They’ll be hell to pay. Glenn, either get your facts right or shut up about Missouri!
Report this comment
Trigus
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 8:51pm90 plus firearm owners – whats that saying: “The Buck Stops Here” – shut them down – stop doing business with any entity that is Anti-American and Infringes on our Constitutional Rights. Stop giving them your hard earned money. Buy local or from entities that are Pro-American and respect our Constitutional RIghts.
90 Million Plus Firearm Owners – The Giant is Awake – How many do you think have Military Training? I see before me the Largest Standing Army in the World. United We Stand, and Divided We Fail.
Report this comment
2B
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 10:00pmIt is important to know what Democrats are trying to do instead of not knowing and then getting elected and getting Obamacare and all the other crap they are doing across the country. Thanks for the story. btw Missouri has a Democrat Govenor now.
Report this comment
Obama_In_PeePee_Is_Becks_Art
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 10:21pm“Missouri Dems Introduce Alarming Gun Confiscation Bill Giving Law-Abiding Gun Owners 90 Days to Turn in Certain Firearms or Become Felons”
Missouri Democrats just put targets on their backs. Missourians must need the extra edge (glasses expensive in Missouri?).
“… what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon & pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is it’s natural manure.”
-Thomas Jefferson (1787)
Report this comment
4PERCENTER
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 11:51pmIt’s not intended to come to a vote. This is a distraction tactic that the low information voters and the so-called conservatives are falling for. This, and Fast and Furious, and Bengasi, and all the other mess, is to distract the people from the likes of the SIX THOUSAND NEW REGULATIONS, passed in the last 90 days, by the EPA and other intranational Gestapo who are taking over the country! Agenda 21 is in full implementation mode, and 99.999% of the people don’t even know what it is! When The Regime hands the keys to America to the UN, there will be no Constitution for the United States of America, and your gun won’t matter anyway. Whose going to shoot who, when there is nothing left to steal? Let me give you a frightening example. The Regime signs ANOTHER executive order, which states: all animals belong to The Regime now, so to shoot an animal is a federal felony, punishable by 5-25 years in prison with no parole. To shoot a person is a federal felony, punishable by 20 years to life in prison with no parole. All guns are now copyrighted by The Regime, and are the “property” of the The Regime. To discharge a gun in The Regime or its territories, is a federal felony, punishable by 1-5 years in prison with no parole, without the expressed written consent of the Copyrights, Trademarks, and Patents Office. So, you get to keep your guns. You just better not fire it, especially if something living gets hurt or killed! Now you have a safe full of legal guns,
Report this comment
christiantcralton
Posted on February 17, 2013 at 8:14pmthats ashamee the goverment going to force thier will on the ppl. the ppl better show up for the vote and just be thier with the media and protesters. exercise your rights before you lose em. prayers for our country will be apreciated
Report this comment
jman-6
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:11pmHope this doesn’t have a chance to see the light of day since the article doesn’t state if the DemoRats have a majority! However in the event it becomes law…I can’t believe we’ve got to this point..it’s sad…but Missouri should become ground zero with every gun supporting patriot lending support the resistance!!
Report this comment
tyrannyandtraitors
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:19pmYou can bank on it.
Report this comment
IndyGuy
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:19pmMissouri……The “Show Me Your Papers ” state……..
Report this comment
Cavallo
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:22pmLittle chance, but just imagine if they did have a majority. At least we can use this now as a hammer to show if they get elected they WILL COME FOR YOUR GUNS. They introduced legislation to do it. But if it does ever happen they can expect a resistance behind every bush and every blade of grass.
Report this comment
jman-6
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:23pmHey politicians I hope if your honestly this stupid that your O’bolshevik care is in full effect, since Missouri is the “show me state” I have a sneaky suspicion there are many a patriot who will gladly show you..pointy end first! LOL!
Report this comment
jman-6
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:26pmIndy- With all due respect sir, what exactly is the problem with that? There is no difference in asking someone for ID i.e. Drivers License or Immigration Docs. It’s one in the same!
Report this comment
RETIREDUSAFDEFENDER
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:28pmWill never pass, Repub controlled.
Report this comment
TheEliteFloorist
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:28pmSome one should still be lynched for even suggesting this ignorance.
Report this comment
jman-6
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:29pmIndy- if that was meant rhetorically please accept my apologies as I should’ve noted, however if not lighten up my friend!
Report this comment
lani59
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:29pmFirst thing I would do is can I leave this state.?
Second if not, can I move my guns out of state?
Third well I guess I’ll become a felon and see what they’ll do then?
Option three could end very badly for this tyranny…….
Report this comment
SquidVetOhio
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:38pm“Indy- With all due respect sir, what exactly is the problem with that? There is no difference in asking someone for ID i.e. Drivers License or Immigration Docs. It’s one in the same!”
I can’t believe I have to explain this but, here goes. You have a Constitutional Right to own a firearm. You do NOT have a Constitutional right to driver’s license. Also, you might want to see the 4th amendment about illegal search and seizure.
“Do you have your free speech registration card on you” sounds ridiculous right? Now you’re getting it.
Report this comment
IndyGuy
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:43pmJMAN….It was meant to point out that this kind of gun grab leads to NAZI style control…
Report this comment
Wisdom7
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:03pmThis is all coming out of St. Louis!
I live in Missouri. I grew up here. These are idiot liberal democrats from the St. Louis area in the 82nd and 86th districts and they can keep their BS in St. Louis.
I’m really sick and tired of people in crap hole cities trying to destroy the rest of the country because their cities are so screwed up, while at the same time declaring it’s the rest of the country. We don’t have these problems out here in the country.
This is the same city Senator Maria Chappelle-Nadal of district 14, another idiot democrat, comes from. She is trying to pass a law (SB 124) that “…creates the offense of negligent storage of a firearm” and “…requires a parent or guardian to notify a school district, or the governing body of a private or charter school, that he or she owns a firearm within 30 days of enrolling the child in school or becoming the owner of a firearm.” In other words, if your guns are not locked in a safe and you don’t tell the school you have a gun, you are suddenly a criminal.
Thankfully, none of these will pass.
Report this comment
henryKnox
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:29pmI would proudly go to prison to defend freedom.
Report this comment
jcldwl
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:54pm@ wisdom7
I couldn’t agree more. I live just outside the city and am currently looking for land far far away.
Report this comment
proliance
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:54pmJ-Man, the authorites can only ask for your driver’s license if you are operating a motor vehicle on public roads. If they don’t have reasonable suspicion of a crime then verbally identifying yourself is perfectly acceptable.
Boarder Patrol agents can ask for your proof of citizenship if you are within 100 miles of the boarder. But unless they have reasonable suspicion that you are in the country illegally, the only thing they can do is ask. You are free to tell them to go piss up a rope.
Report this comment
Wiley41
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 7:45pmMolon labe
Report this comment
Lt_Scrounge
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 9:49pmSince Democrats are so insistent on destroying the second amendment, the way best way for the Republicans to put a permanent end to this stupidity is to pass the law with one, and only one, amendment. That amendment is to give the Dems what they want, but ONLY in respect to other dems. Simply make the laws such that they ONLY apply to Dems. In other words, since the Dem voters seem to want their guns to be banned, ban their guns. Most violent crime in this country is committed by Democrats anyway, so preventing them from owning guns would save lives. See how many Dem voters switch parties when they are forced to hand over their possessions.
Report this comment
IndyGuy
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 9:52am@Lt_Scrounge…Good thought…
Report this comment
The_Cabrito_Goat
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 1:42pmWatch the other hand, my friends. Watch the other hand.
You can sit behind your keyboards and swear that something will never happen, but that has no effect on it’s outcome.
If hope helps you sleep at night, by all means, hope.
Report this comment
progressiveslayer
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:11pmChip chip chip away at the second amendment you filthy progs until you get your total gun ban. You aren’t fooling anyone except of course obamazombies and they want you to be successful in making us all subjects.
Report this comment
Ira McBiff
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:54pmthey wont get it here in Missouri,,Repulicans have a super veto proof majority,,they overroad the Governors veto 7 years ago to restore our right to carry a firearm and eliminate hand gun permits,, and this stunt right here will probibly cost more of the liberal democrat idiots thier jobs in the 2014 midterms
Report this comment
Farmhand82
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:08pmThe funny thing is all the lefty trolls on this site saying we are crazy and that the government isn’t proposing to confiscate anything. They call us paranoid nuts then almost immediately you have a few stories of Democrats proposing full on gun confiscation laws in various states.
Report this comment
Mil-Dot
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:46pmI am just waiting for the spark. When is the Zimmerman trial anyway?
Report this comment
truthnstuff
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:11pmThis is the line in the sand. If they cross this line the Constitution is truly dead. The regime could care less about any laws and will simply ignore whatever they want. Who will stop them? Eric “the red” Holder?
Report this comment
Mil-Dot
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:04pmTruth,
They are not crossing any line in the sand now. They know what will happen to them. Eventually, we are going to have to fight and eliminate these people, or at least become separated from these anti-Constitutionalists. We cannot co-exist much longer.
Report this comment
damnedifwedont
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:40pmHmmmm…it looks to me like the Second American Revolution will begin in Missouri. Seems to me,it’s time.
Report this comment
Lord_Frostwind
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 4:14amConstitutionally, any confiscation measure, and the punishment for resisting it would be a violation of Ex Post Facto, in essence, you can’t punish people for breaking a law if no law was in effect when the did the act in question. It is easy to make the argument that the weapon was purchased when it was legal to do so, and therefore you cannot punish someone for it. And if you want to go the legal route of “possession” similar to laws regarding drugs, prepare for a legal shite storm.
Of course, since when have these bozos been obstructed by the Constitution?
Truth of the matter is, I don’t think this has a chance of moving forward. But it is a red flag that they are getting bolder, and moving deeper into territory that we never thought they would touch. It is possible that they are simply probing to get a taste of how far they can go, but I believe that we need to assume the worst here, that they are preparing for a massive ideological and legal offensive (much worse than anything we’ve seen so far, even the ongoing efforts by CNN) on the Second Amendment and Gun ownership in general.
Report this comment
Osco
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:10pmIt violates the 2nd, and I bet those who put it forth took and oath. Aren’t they violating it here. I say ban iPhones next. Some text and drive and kill others on the road. We will round them up and all the phones that look the same too. We have to save lives?
Report this comment
Trigus
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:15pmMissouri State Constitution: article 1 Bill of rights – Right to keep and bear arms–exception.
Section 23. That the right of every citizen to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person and property, or when lawfully summoned in aid of the civil power, shall not be questioned; but this shall not justify the wearing of concealed weapons.
Report this comment
DefyTYRANNY
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:17pmCell phone use while driving likely kills more people than guns per year.
Report this comment
SquidVetOhio
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:41pm@TRIGUS
A state’s constitution does not trump the federal Constitution. Missouri could amend their constitution to reinstate slavery and it would still be illegal. All that means is that no one has challenged Missouri’s law in SCOTUS yet.
Report this comment
jcldwl
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:57pm@trigus
Unless like I you have a concealed carry permit. I love Missouri this dem bill won’t see the light of day.
Report this comment
Pvillivjay
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:12pmActually the Constitutions states that whatever powers are not specifically given to the fed govt, over the state govt, (which are plainly outlined also as taxes, creating money and a few other powers that do not effect our gun ownership rights) are specifically left to the discretion of the states. The Constitution writers knew too much power in the hands of the fed govt was dangerous, so specifically designed our system so that the states actually have all of the power. They give power to the fed govt only when they voluntarily cede their rights to the feds to decide, otherwise the power to make laws concerning the states remains in the hands of the states. So until the states agree to let the fed govt take away their power of deciding whether they can own guns, the fed govt cannot create any gun ownership law or ban that will trump the authority of the states laws regarding it. Basically if the feds say all guns in US are banned, but all states say no they’re not, the feds cannot enforce the unconstitutional law in the states.
Report this comment
jeff1158
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:10pmIf they come for my weapons I will not comply. If they come to my door I will post on the Blaze to let everyone know that I am about to defend myself. I will not take my own life. If I am dead it will be at the hands of LEO’s. From my cold dead hands.
Report this comment
TheEliteFloorist
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:18pmHere here!!!
Report this comment
Cavallo
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:18pmThey’re likely be a posse of citizens waiting for them when the exit the abode.
Report this comment
dbrockjohnson
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:20pmI’m right there with you! I have to show my daughter what’s right! I would rather die and her know what America is at least SUPOSE to be. Bring it on
Report this comment
tyrannyandtraitors
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:20pmWith you. In St.Louis county. There would be blood if they tried.
Report this comment
WarMunger_Al
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:38pmOf course your dead hands will likely not be cold, as they will burn your house down. A method of assault that a lot on the blaze here seem to wholeheartedly support.
Report this comment
CanadaRocks
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:42pmI guess there will be a few less guns and gun nuts out there then. I dont see a downside. You give up your guns and there is one less assault weapon out there. You dont and try a shootout with the ATF and die, there is one leas gun nut that cant use any of their arsenal. If thats how you choose to deal the situation. It is truly a win win.
Report this comment
bumfuzeled
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:08pm@Canadasucs
The good news is that we the people outnumber the ATF 10,000 to 1 so I like “our” odds of survival. We might even take Canada as a summer playground as only a fool would want to be there in winter.
Report this comment
Shamrock241
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 8:02pm@Jeff1158 If that day come’s be sure to post your address, i am more than willing to drop everything and go to which ever state this starts in. Post on any other conservative site’s you can think of as well, i would like to think we are not all a bunch of keyboard commando’s and you will have plenty of BACKUP.
Report this comment
Dale B
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 8:59pmWe here on the West side of Missouri are ready, willing and able. Prepped, locked and loaded.
Report this comment
EVANROOD
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 11:21pmCANADAROCKS, doesn’t see a downside to this! What a freaking brain dead sheep!
Report this comment
Cavallo
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:09pmMuahaha! Color me happy the story showed. I was getting worried. We have a super majority of Republicans in the legislature so it’s unlikely to go anywhere,.. but HEY METEORS, JROOK.. not just TALKING but trying to ACT ON CONFISCATION.
Report this comment
Xanderson
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:41pmI am very relieved to know MO has a super-majority of R’s in its State House. Hopefully the D fool overreach to grab your property will backfire big time and your R majority will grow even larger in 2014!
Report this comment
LETSBEABOUTIT
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:09pmThe story would have been more complete with a little research on the current makeup of the Missouri house of representatives… Just saying. It’s republican controlled so there is little chance of the bill actually passing. probably won’t even be voted on. But the Blaze can’t raise enough panic if they include all these details…
Report this comment
uzi4u2
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:25pmThat has nothing to do with it. And the repubs controlling the government has nothing to do with it. They had the balls to bring this up. They are counting on the lies from the left to panic people into supporting this. They know it’s not legal in any form but they are counting on this panic and the “do something” types like Barry to force something through. It’s not about crime control or even gun control….it’s about control.
Report this comment
RabbiDRJerkins
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:40pmShalom,
The days are long since gone when we could safely assume that someone associated with the Republican Party would most likely be conservative. You can count the conservatives in Washington on one hand and not have to use all of the fingers.
A Republican majority no longer means anything positive.
Report this comment
Fat Hubie
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:09pmSet the selector switch to “puree”. Blend well. Strain and serve to hogs.
Report this comment
Lt_Scrounge
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 9:58pmWhy bother. A wood chipper would be easier, but hogs aren’t finicky. Drawn and quartered is far more than enough to make the average feral hog perfectly content with its meal.
Report this comment
gyro
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:08pmSo it begins
Report this comment
naughtycal
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:08pmSounds like Missourian might need some help might be time to call the militia from around it fellow states and orginize a nice protest.
Report this comment
Saff SGT
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:18pmAll Militias are on alert and armed
Report this comment
tnman65
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:19pmI can be in Missouri in 2 1/2 hours, if I’m asked I’ll be there.
Report this comment
Wisdom7
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 12:41amPLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING!
Be careful throwing out the word militia. Listen…what you see taking place has been in the works for awhile by these so called elite intellectuals. Do NOT take this stuff for granted! If you live in Missouri, you might recall in 2009 there was a strategic report by MIAC that was leaked to the press basically calling all conservative and libertarians domestic terrorists. Don’t believe me? Please read it!
Secret State Police Report: Ron Paul, Bob Barr, Chuck Baldwin, Libertarians are Terrorists
http://goo.gl/azRba
‘Fusion center’ data draws fire over assertions: Politics, banners seen as suspect
http://goo.gl/7zHs8
Missouri “Militia” Report Withdrawn—SPLC, Obama DHS Defeated (No Thanks To MSM)
http://goo.gl/m3q3B
State Drops Warnings Over ‘Militia’ Members
http://goo.gl/GlS6t
Again, PLEASE READ IT. It might explain what you see going on at present!
Report this comment
Ghandi was a Republican
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:08pmIf you are going to show your gun any of your politicians, you best get around to it. Once they get your guns they will find innumerable reasons to send you to jail anyway. Your guns apparently are the only thing that has been holding them back.
Report this comment
thewhiteright
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:07pmSome would say that the ideology of the 2 Amendment no longer applies today. An example in California, just earlier this week a rouge ex-police-officer was sought for multiple murders. On three different occasions the police opened fired on civilians, no verbal commands, just ambush and open fired. Two women delivering newspapers early in the morning, Truck? the wrong make and model. Plates? did not match. Occupants? the police did not identify. The police just open fired and pummeled them with fifty rounds of ammunition. Is not the citizen permitted to maintain sufficient armament to protect his or her own life? Whether it be to protect against an officer’s inept actions, or it be of the evil intent of a perpetrator, or it be to stave off a tyrannical government. THE CITIZEN HAS THE RIGHT to maintain sufficient armament to guarantee the advantage. The citizen is to be afforded this advantage not the government.
Look at history, study the political climates they faced then and how it mirrors what we face today. We find that the level of wanted counteraction and necessity of resistance seems to coincide to the severity of oppression. The African had no firearms, they became slaves. The Jew had firearms confiscated and the perceived threat to the ruling government mandated the Jews extermination.
The day you hand over your (equally matched/armed) ability to resist the government, is the day you allow the creation of a doorway to servitude, oppression and slavery. Be w
Report this comment
Uechi
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:07pmGood luck commie Dems. If you want to start a Civlil War even if only in Missouri try passing this legislation. All the ah’s that have had a hand in this anti Constitutional proposed legislation better move out of state quick or get what you deserve.
Report this comment
Saff SGT
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:17pmSupreme Court said as much we could shoot them when they arrive at your home to infringe
Report this comment
Cavallo
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:30pmOr from the side. Don’t think that once this gets out that they are confiscating that people will sit idly by as their neighbors are murdered by the State. They would also have to probably use LEOs from out of state, because most of these LEOs have family that live in the community.
Report this comment
WarMunger_Al
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:44pmCavallo-
When dorner shot the girl and her fiance, the cops investigated. When he shot the cops, they swarmed liked bee’s. The same thing will happen when one gun owner decides to protect his liberty. Hopefully, the neighboring guns owners come to his aid.
Report this comment
Tom
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:07pmAMERICA is heading for some very ugly days because of these idiots.
Report this comment
midnightsun
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:07pmThis is exactly what Obama wants.
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:18pmObama is just following orders from the International Left which droned him on America. The old International Workers of the World set !
Report this comment
Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:06pmAnd so it continues from the Democratic lunatics; if Obama and the left cannot grab the guns on the federal level, they will do so on the state level.
Report this comment
gyro
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:15pmSnowleopard your missing something ?
It isnt that simple ?
Report this comment
progressiveslayer
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:15pmYes indeed he will attack on all angles simultaneously and he won’t stop until he gets his total gun ban.
An armed populace is too dangerous for a Marxist POS fraud president so the assault on our right to bear arms will continue.
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:50pmPRO: Agree. And have you noticed how the Democrats are thinning the ranks of our military ? So much is afoot during Obama II….can you imagine what the ” Greatest Generation” would have thought of these Far Left 60s radicals who are in charge now ?
Report this comment
Popp40
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:21pmWhy do you think the government is buying up all the ammo? We need to connect the dots.
Report this comment
progressiveslayer
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 7:20pmBarber They would be just as disgusted as we are I suspect and to think of how many of those who died in WW II protecting and defending the constitution only to see these filthy progs in charge dismantling our republic.
Report this comment
WatchingThePuppetShow
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:06pmPlaying into the dismantling of America one state at a time. Homie don’t play that game!
Report this comment
Autumknight
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:06pmThe first shots of the next Civil War will be fired in Missouri
Report this comment
Saff SGT
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:22pmyes it has to start some where if this is going to happen lets get it on so we can end this left Wing nightmare quickly
Report this comment
braddock66
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:37pmCount me in!
Report this comment
ledbythnose
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:32pmKNIGHT
The first shots will be fired any where a single persons Property is invaded illegally to confiscate his weapons. Missouri will be a fine place to get the Party started. These Lefties have no idea how many rifles will be turned on them within hours of such a move. Any other State that want’s to try such a Criminal act against it’s Citizenry will face the same response. We are facing a Civil War in America Folks most likely before the end of this year. I pray you are all ready. We are down here in Texas. Bring it!
Report this comment
tyrannyandtraitors
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:05pmThis will never pass. These two idiots are in a very small minority in the Missouri legislature. Local LEO and PDs as well as the majority of the legislature will not support this. The majority of Missourians, myself included, would not comply. There would be blood in the streets if they tried.
Report this comment
truthnstuff
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:13pmIf there were some way to recall these clowns it would be a good example.
Report this comment
GroundZero is Nuclear Demolition x3
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:13pmWhat ever you do, just don’t shoot them, bullets are too expensive. Bear Lake CA has shown a much more effective way, and of course it can be justified as the occupants fault.
Report this comment
Ghandi was a Republican
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:17pmYes– But you can bet this lunacy is being floated from above. A measure to desensitize the populace while arguing false merits. “nudge” Raise the straw man,, make arguments that don’t have anything to do with anything sound plausible. ie. “You don’t need the U.S.S. Missouri to go squirrel hunting”,
“You don’t need 16mm cannons to take down a rabbit”, “You don’t need those silly handles to hit a target at the range” — “You don’t need all those silly bullets” –
Report this comment
FNGRNFAN
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:25pmWe the people are the boss and we will decide.
Report this comment
Apple Bite
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 3:51amFolk really don’t know about the history of Missouri, when it comes to riots. In fact just about 100 years ago, Missourians rioted in the streets over jobs and such, killings and beatings were very common around St. Louis and nearby areas during the time. If there was ever a state that lived by it’s motto, it’s Missouri. I can’t imagine Missouri becoming a Zombie state for Democrats all of a sudden, especially since there are a lot of hunters running about on a yearly basis. If that bill does somehow magically pass, head for Arkansas or Kansas. It’s that or go down shooting.
Report this comment
Mil-Dot
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 12:17pmTrust me, We will not allow any of that crap in Missouri. “The Outlaw Josey Wales” character in the popular movie was from Missouri. There is a reason they did that. Enough said.
Report this comment
EPROM
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:05pmFamous Liberal Quote: “Nobody talking about taking away your firearms!”.
…Yah, …Right.
Report this comment
DefyTYRANNY
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:15pmNo kidding. The lib trolls favorite response just became a lie in fact not just intent.
It is happening. Missouri residents, you have 90 days after (and if) this passes to pick up your belongings and move.
I suspect this will be attempted in many more states in the next months.
I doubt it will pass, but anyone who loves freedom take note of these names.
Report this comment
justangry
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:05pmAny insight on whether this bill will get through, or is it just liberals posturing?
Report this comment
tyrannyandtraitors
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:09pmThis will never pass. They are a SMALL minority in the MO legislature. Local PDs and LEOs would not support it and Missourians like me would never comply. There would be bl00d in the streets.
Report this comment
Cavallo
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:10pmWe have a super majority of republicans in the legislature. But I want to know if Claire Bear supports this.
Report this comment
right field
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:11pmSomeone needs to run against these idiots. The people of Missouri deserve better Democrats/Marxist to represent them – Imagine, saying outright that you want to confiscate guns and prosecute citizens when you could just lie and make people think you were trying to protect the “children.”
Report this comment
gyro
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:14pmIt does not mater if it gets through all thatmaters is that it gets voted on
winning or loosing has nothing to do with anything it is all about getting into a court so a liberal judge can rule on it
They are pounding in fence posts 1 post at a time when the fence is compleat they add the wire
and everyone will say they never saw anyone build the fence
:)
Report this comment
timtritt
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:16pmNo chance – 24-10 Rep to Dem in the Senate, 106-56 Rep to Dem in the Assembly/House… This is just posturing.
Report this comment
momrules
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:20pmI’ll trust people who know more about the Missouri legislature to answer your question but the very fact that this bill has been introduced is alarming.
To me it means the left is testing the waters. What kind of response will be raised and by whom.
If even one state, even a predominately Democratic state, ever passes such a bill Obama and gang will run with it. They probably have the confiscation EO already written, signed and loaded in the teleprompter.
Report this comment
marssnw
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 10:44amThese people need to be brought into the light after pushing forward legislation like this. If more people know who these morons are, the less likely they will be re-elected. Its never a bad thing to be informed and educated as to who the crazy politicians are. We don’t want to be the uninformed voter. We have enough of those people in this country.
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:05pmFirst, the government came after the legally purchased ” assault weapons” ……
Report this comment
dynaflow1
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:04pmThese Dumocrats are nuts!!!!!!!!! They need to read the constitution!!!!!!
Report this comment
Cavallo
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:11pmThey’ve read it.. They don’t care.
Report this comment
jman-6
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:17pmKeep waiting on them to read it and I’ll keep loading. Anyone can read it, adhering to it is a whole different story!
Report this comment
barber2
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:22pmDYNA: Haven’t you heard ? The Democrats want to ” change ” all things in America – guess that includes the Constitution !
Report this comment
GuruMeditation
Posted on February 15, 2013 at 6:13amThey know what it says. Rather, it’s time for the people to put them in their proper place.
Report this comment
Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:02pmAlright, let the fun begin, Missouri is the Show Me state, maybe they can show these Dems the door. If not, they get what they deserve.
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:23pmDARMOK, I hope that you are right and this happens again nationwide like it did in ’94. Brady I and II played a major role in the Dems losing the House and Senate that year for the first time in over forty years. Hopefully, the attacks in these states will result in the same thing. As the Dem-wits were taken over by the radical left in our state we started to oust them and send them packing. Their actions have come close to exterminating their party here, and this was all Dems from Post Reconstruction to the late ’80s. The people here were just stuck on what the Republicans supposedly did to them after the Civil War. They finally learned that it was what the Dems had been doing for over a hundred years. After living in Upstate, NY and going shooting with many of the residents in the area, and knowing how they feel on this subject. I can see even some minor changes in their state’s political face.
Report this comment
Lotus503
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:25pmAs a life-long Missourian, I have one thing to say to these fascist St. Louis democrat drips…MOLON LABE!
Report this comment
Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 4:37pmRJJ:
Our Dems in Colorado are doing the same thing, being led by a Senator that is out next year due to term limits, but I think he will bring his party down. If it wasn’t for boulder and Denver, they would not be in power right now.
Report this comment
RJJinGadsden
Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:12pmDARMOK, Good luck on that. If things keep going the way they are here, although the Dems are kicking and screaming all the way. We’ll have only certain pockets with a minor Dem stranglehold in places like Birmingham, Montgomery, and few other more minor cities, and communities.
You guys need to run many of the Californians back to California. I’m so glad that my parents got us out of there back in the mid to late ’50s. We still have relatives out there and they really worry me at times.
Report this comment