Government

Senate Republicans Block Vote on Chuck Hagel Nomination…For Now

Senate Republicans Mounting Filibuster Against Defense Nominee Chuck Hagel

WASHINGTON, DC – FEBRUARY 07: U.S. President Barack Obama’s nominee for secretary of defense and former U.S. Senator Chuck Hagel (R-NE) arrives for a meeting with U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) February 7, 2013 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. The Senate Armed Services Committee has delayed its vote on the confirmation for Hagel because the committee’s review of the nomination is not yet complete. Credit: Getty Images

UPDATE: WASHINGTON (AP) — Republicans have, for now, blocked Chuck Hagel’s nomination to become defense secretary.

The Senate came up two votes short of the 60 needed to move Hagel’s nomination forward as lawmakers prepare to leave town for a week’s break. Democrats hold a 55-45 edge in the Senate.

Republicans had been blocking the confirmation of their former colleague and Vietnam veteran until they received information from the White House on President Barack Obama’s actions during the attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya.

The White House responded to that request earlier Thursday, saying Obama spoke with Libyans a day after the attack.

 

WASHINGTON (AP) — Struggling to break an impasse, Senate Democrats set a test vote Thursday on whether to advance Chuck Hagel’s nomination as defense secretary after Republicans blocked speedy confirmation of their former colleague and Vietnam combat veteran.

Hours of behind-the-scenes talks yielded the decision by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, but no clear sign of whether President Barack Obama’s nominee would receive the 60 votes required to move the Senate to a final vote on whether to confirm him. Democratic officials said the vote was scheduled with only a handful of votes needed to clear the threshold.

Sen. John McCain of Arizona led the opposition to Hagel’s confirmation, but he said he would not object to the test vote, called cloture.

The remaining “yes” votes remain elusive, even after the White House responded to McCain’s demand for information unrelated to Hagel. McCain and Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire said they would delay the vote until they got a more detailed accounting of Obama’s actions on the night of the attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, where Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were killed. Republicans have sought to portray Obama as being out of touch during the raid and demanded to know whether Obama spoke to any Libyan official during the Sept. 11 assault.

The Republicans’ demand has had the effect of a filibuster.

Senate Republicans Mounting Filibuster Against Defense Nominee Chuck Hagel

Senate Armed Services Committee members, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., left, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. confer on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Feb. 14, 2013, at the start of the committee’s hearing on the appointments of military leaders. The two Republicans have been vocal in their opposition to the nomination of Chuck Hagel to be the next secretary of defense. While Democrats hold a 55-45 edge in the Senate and have the numbers to confirm Hagel on a majority vote, they need the support of five Republicans to clear the way for an up-or-down vote on him. Credit: AP

The White House responded Thursday by saying former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called Libyan President Mohamed Magariaf on Obama’s behalf on Sept. 11 to coordinate additional support to protect Americans in Libya, White House counsel Kathryn Ruemmler wrote the senators. Obama spoke to Magariaf on the evening of Sept. 12, she said.

The Obama administration also had disclosed the calls at the time they were made.

A White House official said Thursday that if there had been a need to push the Libyans to do something, Obama would have called, but the official said the Libyans were trying to do the right thing and were being as helpful as possible. Moreover, the official, discussing internal communications only on the condition of anonymity, said the earlier call with Clinton had gone well.

Reid said it was “shocking” and “tragic” that the GOP would attempt to block Hagel’s nomination at a time when the U.S. military is engaged in so many places around the world. “Not a single nominee for secretary of defense ever in the history of our country has been filibustered,” he said in a speech on the Senate floor.

Reid said Republicans notified him Wednesday night they would withhold the votes needed to advance Hagel’s nomination. Reid said he considered that a “full-scale filibuster” because the Republican strategy would prevent Hagel’s nomination from getting the required 60 votes.

Republicans are seeking “extraneous requests” for information that will never be satisfied, Reid said. “The pattern has been clear for months: as soon as President Obama’s administration responds to one request, Republicans devise another, more outlandish request,” Reid said.

A full Senate vote on Hagel, a former two-term Republican senator from Nebraska and twice-wounded Vietnam veteran, was expected to be held Friday after Reid filed a motion to limit debate. While Democrats hold a 55-45 edge in the Senate and have the numbers to confirm Hagel on a majority vote, they need the support of five Republicans to clear the way for a majority vote.

Two Republicans – Sens. Thad Cochran of Mississippi and Mike Johanns of Nebraska – have announced their support for Hagel. A third, Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, has said she will vote against Hagel’s confirmation, but would not join in a filibuster to block a final vote.

Graham said Wednesday that he would vote against ending debate on Hagel’s nomination.

“There seems to not be much interest to hold this president accountable for a national security breakdown that led to the first ambassador being killed in the line of duty in over 30 years,” Graham said. “No, the debate on Chuck Hagel is not over. It has not been serious. We don’t have the information we need. And I’m going to fight the idea of jamming somebody through until we get answers about what the president did personally when it came to the Benghazi debacle.”

McCain declined to say whether he would try to delay Hagel’s confirmation if Obama did not provide an answer. “My position right now is I want an answer to the question,” he said.

The nomination of John Brennan as CIA director is also being delayed; the Senate Intelligence Committee is pushing off a vote amid demands that the White House turn over more details about drone strikes against terror suspects and about the Benghazi attacks. Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein of California said a vote likely will be postponed till late February.

A bitterly divided Armed Services Committee on Tuesday voted to approve Hagel by a 14-11 vote, with all the panel’s Democrats backing him. The committee’s Republicans were unified in opposition to their onetime colleague, who will succeed Defense Secretary Leon Panetta if he’s confirmed.

Obama “stands strongly” behind Hagel and believes he “will do a wonderful job,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said aboard Air Force One en route to Decatur, Ga., where the president traveled Thursday to speak about early childhood education.

If confirmed by the Senate, Hagel, 66, would take charge of the U.S. armed forces at a time of turmoil. Automatic cuts to the Pentagon’s budget are looming, American troops in Afghanistan are being halved over the next year, North Korea has tested a nuclear weapon, Iran remains a threat in the Persian Gulf region, and Syria, Iraq, Libya, Egypt, Mali and Tunisia all are in a state of unrest.

At a Pentagon award ceremony on Thursday for former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Panetta said it was fitting to recognize her accomplishments on Valentine’s Day. And he said the second-best Valentine’s Day present would be for the Senate to confirm Hagel and allow Panetta and his wife to “get the hell out of town.” He said he’s got his belongings packed.

Hagel has faced intense opposition from Republicans, who have challenged his past statements and votes on Israel, Iran, Iraq and nuclear weapons.

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Comments (70)

  • Saff SGT
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 7:05pm

    Brennan needs to get worked over also he deserves it

    Report this comment

    Saff SGT  
  • Frederick_Douglass_Republican
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:57pm

    Hagel is a degenerate. I still can’t see the repubs having the backbone to block anything regardless of how necessary it is to do so.

    Report this comment

    Frederick_Douglass_Republican  
  • tharpdevenport
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:53pm

    I have a caption for the picture of McCain and Graham looking down on the chairs:

    “Ewwwww … looks like Al Roker’s been here…”

    Report this comment

    tharpdevenport  
  • barber2
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:51pm

    ZIP: Anarchists aren’t noted for their fine manners. They belong more to the ‘ poop on police cars ‘ crowd.

    Report this comment

    barber2  
  • garbagecanlogic
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:51pm

    About time they got some b*lls!

    Praise Be To Obama. Psalm 109:8

    The U.N. Out Of The U.S.
    The U.S. Out Of The U.N.

    Report this comment

    garbagecanlogic  
  • barber2
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:48pm

    Hopefully, the Republicans have gotten our message: stand up to these Chicago radical Democrats. This is a war. The Democrats have declared it. Their MSM has declared it. Republicans need to fight back because there will be no negotiating with the radical Democrats who are only interested in pushing THEIR agenda , not what is in the best interest of America.

    Report this comment

    barber2  
  • cva
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:31pm

    Hope they do the same with Brennan. He’s worse.

    Report this comment

    cva  
  • toomuchgovt
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:21pm

    All of these candidates should be “Borked”. Not in the memory of Ted Kennedy as an esteemed commented said but in the memory of the late great Justice Robert Bork.

    Report this comment

    toomuchgovt  
    • JacquesChirac
      Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:33pm

      Hmmm…the Repubs will filibuster to stop nominees, but not to stop the spending…

      Some backbone…

      Report this comment

      JacquesChirac  
  • RJJinGadsden
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:16pm

    ZIPIT, That’s not a bong, it has to be more like a Jack Daniels enema.

    Report this comment

    RJJinGadsden  
    • YOURSENSEI
      Posted on February 14, 2013 at 10:16pm

      Mr or Ms RJJINGADSDEN,

      This is what you must know:

      Yes, enema. Now I know where junior learned to scat. Martin Bashir is right . . . “feces obsession.”

      It is so.

      Report this comment

      YOURSENSEI  
  • kalli
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:14pm

    What really puzzles me is why congress have allowed clinton and b.o. to get away with their cover-up of gun-running to their Syrian rebel friends, al qaeda. In this article, there is no mention of the stupid video these two blasted for weeks as the cause, even paying $70,000 to post another video to the muslims apologizing. These two should be held accountable for the murder of 4 Americans at the very least. Why do these people keep getting away with lying and creating more lies to cover up their lying hearts?

    Report this comment

     
    • Stuck_in_CA
      Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:22pm

      McStain & company are setting this nomination up for BO to do a Recess Appointment. It’s all a big phoney show.

      Report this comment

      Stuck_in_CA  
  • MeteoricLimbo
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:12pm

    Another “Plant” in the Islamic Garden.

    Report this comment

    MeteoricLimbo  
  • Zipit
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:11pm

    DUDE! Step away from the bong!

    Report this comment

    Zipit  
  • dosdelgados
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:10pm

    Ladies and gentlemen, the epitome of class.

    Report this comment

    dosdelgados  
  • Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:48pm

    Glad to see the filibuster has worked for now, Hagel must never become Sec of Defense, as he is completely unfit for the position.

    Report this comment

    Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}  
    • FLOWNOVERandFORGOTTEN
      Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:56pm

      We just fell into the left’s trap. Get ready for the mother of all recess appointments.

      Report this comment

      FLOWNOVERandFORGOTTEN  
    • RJJinGadsden
      Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:18pm

      FLOWNOVERANDFORGOTTEN, Good point, that is certain to happen. They should do as they did over the holidays when 0bama appointed those two to the NLRB, which are the same two he is going to appoint the moment the Congress goes into recess this time.

      Report this comment

      RJJinGadsden  
  • Gonzo
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:46pm

    Stand strong for a change you bunch of RINOS. Good job (so far).

    Report this comment

    Gonzo  
    • oldguy49
      Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:49pm

      get this muslim lover completely out of government……………..

      Report this comment

      oldguy49  
    • Fubared
      Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:02pm

      Just going by his crap hearing last week, he probably needs to be in a rehab for a while and then maybe some history 101. Dude was unprepared, flatfooted, dumbfounded, and not worthy of the position. Regardless of R or D, the man was not up to a hearing.

      Report this comment

      Fubared  
    • AUsername
      Posted on February 14, 2013 at 10:25pm

      all because he won’t submit to Israel a user of America. this is why the Republicans lose against their counterparts, because unlike the derdercrats, they boast about the wars and put America behind Israel and there not gaining any voters by doing that, actually losing voters because people are concerned about their home and family not some random nation in the desert.

      Report this comment

      AUsername  
  • RJJinGadsden
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:42pm

    Don’t fall for Dingy Harry Reid’s whining. The Dems filibustered a Reagan nominee for Defense that kept the cabinet position open for more than three months. No, we were not in Afghanistan then, we were facing the Soviet Union, Communist China, and Communist North Korea on a daily basis blended with the major turmoil in the Middle East.
    SENDTHEMEATEEYORES, yeah, yeah, I know well about the Marine barracks in Beirut, and from your ramblings that I have seen here. I know a lot more than you. I was stationed with a fellow soldier whose brother was on a machine gun post on the opposite side of the attack and survived the bombings. But, he spent a few days not knowing. Have met Marines and SF personnel shortly afterwards who were there as well. But, I’m sure you will try with more of you well worn and lame lies again tonight.

    Report this comment

    RJJinGadsden  
    • RJJinGadsden
      Posted on February 14, 2013 at 6:45pm

      I must correct myself again. It was John Towers, just couldn’t think of his name. And, he was not filibustered, but by tactics of procedure held up by the Senate Dems for over three months.

      Report this comment

      RJJinGadsden  
    • dublinthewagons
      Posted on February 14, 2013 at 8:51pm

      Correct.

      Now we will have an executive order, during the two week recess

      Report this comment

      dublinthewagons  
  • aojeda
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:40pm

    While yes, no nominee was ever filibustered, it is important to remember Andrew Johnson was impeached because of his dealings with the Secretary of War. He wanted more leniency in the South after the Civil War and tried to get a moderate into the position through the backdoor.

    Ironically, they were asking the same questions back then: how much power does the federal government have in the respective states? Unfortunately, at that time, more than we’d like to think. Until the compromise to elect Rutherford B. Hayes, “states’ rights” meant the federal government could dictate civil law in the respective states until deemed able by Congress.

    Report this comment

    aojeda  
  • Voter713
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:38pm

    Alrighty – in a week will know who the Administration bribed to give Hagel the spot.

    Report this comment

    Voter713  
  • Zipit
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:37pm

    It would be nice to know that this was a sign of “good things to come”! Some of our guys found I spine, and are willing to fight the good fight. Yay! Or is it just a fleeting glimpse?

    Report this comment

    Zipit  
    • CatB
      Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:45pm

      Time will tell but I wouldn’t get my hopes up … some of these R’s were wearing the gun control ribbon during the state of the union….they cannot be trusted to do the right thing … THEY MUST BE PUSHED BY US!

      Report this comment

      CatB  
    • oldguy49
      Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:52pm

      catb…………..all my guns went fishing with me this weekend……………………darn things fell overboard…along with all the ammo…………..don’t you just hate it when s#$t happens

      Report this comment

      oldguy49  
  • Verceofreason
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:29pm

    Republicans are killing this country with inertia

    Report this comment

    Verceofreason  
    • S-O-B-E-R
      Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:39pm

      Are you given a list of what to say? Do any of you have an original thought? Do you even know what critical thinking is? Do you have to drug yourself to remain so dense or does it come naturally?

      Report this comment

      S-O-B-E-R  
    • RJJinGadsden
      Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:46pm

      In memory of Teddy Kennedy, just Bork Hagel.

      Report this comment

      RJJinGadsden  
  • RJJinGadsden
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:24pm

    The best thing about this expected vote result was spot checking BSNBC and watching Martin Bashir literally coming apart at the seams. You could almost see steam escaping. If his face had gotten any redder we might have had a Scanners moment.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HY-03vYYAjA

    Report this comment

    RJJinGadsden  
  • zoro51
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:23pm

    DO NOT LET THIS JEW HATER INTO ANYTHING NOT EVEN A BATHROOM he shouldnt be sect of ANY DEFENSE this man is a SOCIALSIT PLANT IMPEACH OBAMA REMOVE HIM NOW.. Hagel NO this will not go

    Report this comment

    zoro51  
  • neverending
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:19pm

    Best news I read all day long – now just make sure he is denied confirmation.

    Report this comment

    neverending  
    • CatB
      Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:42pm

      He needs to just go away … if he doesn’t then the R’s should use ALL the dirty tricks of the DEMS to force him out. Tired of playing “nice” with commies!

      Report this comment

      CatB  
  • shorelineliz
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:16pm

    Good! Filibuster the crap out of this guy!

    Report this comment

    shorelineliz  
  • dosdelgados
    Posted on February 14, 2013 at 5:11pm

    Hagel’s disqualifications stand on their own, without Benghazi.

    Report this comment

    dosdelgados  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In