
A picture on the Maker’s Mark Facebook page reiterates the company’s decision to retract its plan to water down its bourbon.
LOUISVILLE, Ky. (The Blaze/AP) — After backlash from customers, the producer of Maker’s Mark bourbon is reversing a decision to cut the amount of alcohol in bottles of its famous whiskey.
Rob Samuels, Maker’s Mark’s chief operating officer, said Sunday that it is restoring the alcohol volume of its product to its historic level of 45 percent, or 90 proof. Last week, it said it was lowering the amount to 42 percent, or 84 proof, because of a supply shortage.
“We’ve been tremendously humbled over the last week or so,” Samuels, grandson of the brand’s founder, said of customers’ reactions.
The brand known for its square bottles sealed in red wax has struggled to keep up with demand. Distribution has been squeezed, and the brand had to curtail shipments to some overseas markets.
In a tweet Sunday, the company said to its followers: “You spoke. We listened.”
Fans of the whiskey applauded the move and questioned why the company moved to change in the first place.
“Some things you just got to leave alone,” Todd Matthews, 42, of Livingston, Tenn., said.
Company officials said much customer feedback came from Twitter and Facebook. On those sites, comments on Sunday’s change of course ranged from angry to celebratory to self-congratulatory. The statement on Maker’s Mark’s Facebook page drew more than 14,000 “likes” and 2,200 comments within two hours of Sunday’s announcement.
Or as TheAtlantic puts it, “Comments on the Facebook post are so enthusiastic a few border on the insane.” Here’s a non-watered down taste:
But another common sentiment was that the retraction could have been planned all along:
The change in recipe started with a shortage of the bourbon amid an ongoing expansion of the company’s operations that cost tens of millions of dollars.
Maker’s Mark Chairman Emeritus Bill Samuels, the founder’s son, said the company focused almost exclusively on not altering the taste of the bourbon while stretching the available product and didn’t consider the emotional attachment that customers have to the brand and its composition.
Bill Samuels said the company tinkered with how much water to add and keep the taste the same for about three months before making the announcement about the change Monday. It marked the first time the bourbon brand, more than a half-century old, had altered its proof or alcohol volume.
“Our focus was on the supply problem. That led to us focusing on a solution,” Bill Samuels said. “We got it totally wrong.”
Both Bill and Rob Samuels said customer reaction was immediate. Company officials heard from “thousands and thousands of consumers” that a bourbon shortage was preferable to a change in how the spirits were made, Bill Samuels said.
“They would rather put up with the occasional supply shortage than put up with any change in their hand-made bourbon,” Rob Samuels said.
The change in alcohol volume called for the recipe and process to stay the same, except for a “touch more water” to be added when the whiskey comes out of the barrel for bottling, Rob Samuels said.
When production restarts Monday, those plans are off the table, Bill Samuels said.
“We really made this decision after an enormous amount of thought, and we focused on the wrong things,” Bill Samuels said.
Maker’s Mark is owned by spirits company Beam Inc., based in Deerfield, Ill. Its other brands include Jim Beam bourbon.
Maker’s is made at a distillery near the small town of Loretto, 45 miles south of Louisville.
Its bourbon ages in barrels for at least six summers and no longer than seven years before bottling.
The supply shortage at Maker’s comes amid growing demand for Kentucky bourbons in general.
Combined Kentucky bourbon and Tennessee whiskey sales from producers or suppliers to wholesalers rose 5.2 percent to 16.9 million cases last year, according to the Distilled Spirits Council, a national trade association that released figures last week. Revenue shot up 7.3 percent to $2.2 billion, it said. Premium brands, generally made in smaller batches with heftier prices, led sales and revenue gains.
Kentucky produces 95 percent of the world’s bourbon supply, according to the Kentucky Distillers’ Association. There are 4.9 million bourbon barrels aging in Kentucky, which outnumbers the state’s population.
























































































































NRA4LIFE
Feb. 19, 2013 at 10:11pmthe is great to hear… one of my most favorite whiskeys will stay the same.. i will be celebrating the good fortunes of free market capitalism this weekend w/ a bottle or two of Makers Mark.. if i can only get the damn lid open..jk
its a shame that the idiots in washington cant be inspired this easily
Report this comment
Proud Southerner
Feb. 19, 2013 at 10:44amWell one way to fix the supply problem is to ruin the product. So here is a warning to Sam Adams (who have never indicated that they would) beer which I drink. Never tamper with a good thing.
Report this comment
bobad
Feb. 19, 2013 at 9:53amI thought Maker’s Mark was aged 5 or 10 years? That means they have several years of produciton aging. How are they going to change it if it’s in the process of aging? What you will end up with is adulterated MM, because you can’t change it instantly like Coke.
Report this comment
diablosho
Feb. 19, 2013 at 10:48amI’m sure you saw where it said they “add a ‘touch more water” to be added when the whiskey comes out of the barrel for bottling.” Since the product would be watered down AFTER removing from the barrel, it stands to reason that it doesn’t matter how many barrels there are, nor how long they are aging…the next barrel to be opened would get the water…
Report this comment
NRA4LIFE
Feb. 19, 2013 at 10:07pmall they do is add more water when it goes to bottling.. that will reduce the alcohol %
Report this comment
Rijkstra
Feb. 18, 2013 at 4:52pmI’m one of the suckers who bought a 1.75L bottle of 90 proof as an investment. Now, it’s just an ordinary bottle of expensive bourbon.
Was the threat to cut Maker’s Mark just a ploy to induce a temporary spike in sales? I think it’s very possible. It did sound fishy to me. The usual marketing tactic would be to introduce the cut version and continue the original, but maybe that isn’t feasible in a small distillery.
Report this comment
The Other Watcher
Feb. 18, 2013 at 2:54pmShould of changed the proof and the label and said nothing. I’ll bet most user’s wouldn’t even notice, unless they looked at the label.
Report this comment
Rijkstra
Feb. 18, 2013 at 5:16pmI look at labels. I buy Evan Williams because at 86 proof, it’s often no more expensive than other bourbon brands at 80 proof.
Knob Hill was also 90 proof the last time I looked. I got a bad bottle of it once and quit drinking it.
Report this comment
Chuck Stein
Feb. 18, 2013 at 12:10pmSounds like the “New Coke” move — excellent publicity. No one at Maker’s Mark gets in trouble for this. Instead, somebody gets a raise/bonus/promotion.
Report this comment
turkey13
Feb. 18, 2013 at 2:15pmThese kids coming out of college have never heard the saying, “If it ain’t broke don’t fix it. Coke did there thing and I have been drinking A&W root bear ever since!
Report this comment
Guitar Master
Feb. 18, 2013 at 10:58amzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
From THE REPORTER
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
It’s simply called “screw you.” Have any of you noticed how many, many consumer goods have shrunk over the past 3 or 4 yrs? Makers Mark is one of a long line of companies that have decided to decrease the amount of product to INCREASE the amount of profit in this ultra slow economy. Check your cereal boxes folks.
Instead of rewarding their loyal customers big business say’s “how can we screw ‘them’ in order to increase our profits.” They are like deviates trying to figure out ways to give the American people less while they make more profit. Makers Mark is just one more, in a long line, of companies being run by pinstriped bandits.
Report this comment
davidwjohnson
Feb. 18, 2013 at 11:53amIn order to maintain profits where the government says there is no inflation, companies reduce the volume of their products in order to keep prices from rising too fast BECAUSE of inflation.
The government no longer includes food prices when it reports inflation, but everyone else knows better.
It’s simple economics, when the cost of goods go up, so must prices. You may not like it as a consumer, but a business can’t continue with a profit margin that doesn’t make running the business worthwhile.
You wouldn’t continue working a job that left you with $10 a paycheck after you paid your bills.
Report this comment
RedSpotinaBlueState
Feb. 18, 2013 at 2:37pmI’ve noticed that the 20lb bag of Purina dog chow that used to cost $7.97 at Walmart is now an 18.5lb bag and costs $11.97.
Report this comment
willbedone
Feb. 18, 2013 at 10:17amI would guess that the root of the problem is more corn is being grown for use in gasoline than human consumption. GOOD Kentucky whiskey is usually ALL corn.
Report this comment
jwpowers41
Feb. 18, 2013 at 10:31amstop petting ethanol in gasoline it screws up the engines. I have to drain my generator oth that ****
or it won’t start after 2 or 3 months stop the ethanol we need a national movement to remove ethanol from
our gas……screw the government eneything they touch turns to ****
Report this comment
Marsh626
Feb. 18, 2013 at 10:06amOh, thank God. I hate it when people mess with my booze.
*eye roll*
The conservative movement has apparently become the movement of big gulps, twinkies, hard liquor, fast food, bacon, porn, weed, Sarah Palin and rap music (Marco Rubio is my dawg).
More and more conservatives are living like degenerate “liberal” trash.
We used to stand for traditional values. Apparently that’s been reduced to mindlessly worshipping the American flag and going ape every time a public nativity scene gets banned…
Report this comment
JayCee
Feb. 18, 2013 at 1:16pmWhat on earth does this have to do with conservatism?
Report this comment
tommysoap
Feb. 18, 2013 at 1:48pmMarsh When a cogent point happens by….just hop on.
Report this comment
Jaycen
Feb. 18, 2013 at 6:52pmThose things are all symbols of freedom. That makes them synonymous with Conservative.
You’re thinking back to the days when religious Progressives controlled the Republican Party. Your party has merged with the Democrats and is now known simply as Communists.
Regards.
Report this comment
eric55
Feb. 18, 2013 at 10:02amI used to be a die hard bourbon guy, since i discovered vodka i never looked back, no headache hangover or heartburn Awesome stuff the Russians got it right
Report this comment
tommysoap
Feb. 18, 2013 at 1:49pmYou forgot “no flavor”.
Report this comment
scrapadapolis
Feb. 18, 2013 at 8:40amWhat MAKERS should do to get the best of both worlds is take a 1/4 of stock and water it down for the people that wouldn’t mind a lower alcohol content “ME” and also keep the original stock un touched.You can even charge the same because just because the alcohol is less it will have the same flavor.
Report this comment
Southerner01
Feb. 18, 2013 at 9:29amIf their supply is insufficient to meet demand at current prices, they can always raise prices, reducing demand while increasing profit.
Report this comment
msconstrue
Feb. 18, 2013 at 8:35amgreetings from the bourbon capitol of the world!!!……
Report this comment
DZ-015
Feb. 18, 2013 at 8:35amWater down the product, increase the profit. That’s capitalism, right? If the buyers don’t care, fine. If they raise a stink, apologize. It’s free publicity, courtesy of The Blaze.
Report this comment
Melika
Feb. 18, 2013 at 9:02amThat’s not capitalism. This was a publicity stunt, and well played. They clearly state that there is a huge increase in demand creating the shortage. In capitalism, the price would then increase until production caught up, and then the price would decrease (or not) to its normal levels. There was no need for this “change” other than to drum up some publicity.
Report this comment
No Grass
Feb. 18, 2013 at 8:17amNo I haven’t noticed the censorship. I don’t think in those descriptions, so I don’t use those words.
Report this comment
UNALIEN
Feb. 18, 2013 at 8:13ampublicity stunt???
Report this comment
NoMoMrNiceGuy
Feb. 18, 2013 at 8:09amI am still not sure if this was a self inflicted shortage or not. If it was, then it was just Peeis Poor Planning !
Report this comment