Regardless of how you feel about last name changes based on marriage, there are arguments in favor of children always taking on the father’s last name that you might not have thought about before.

(Photo: Shutterstock.com)
Satoshi Kanazawa for Big Think wrote that although it might actually make a whole lot of sense for women to keep their maiden name, children should always take the father’s name. But why? Why not, as Parade’s Marilyn vos Savant suggests, let boys take their father’s name and girl’s their mother’s name?
Kanazawa’s main point as to why not is the fact of investment on the part of the father that generally results in greater survival of the child. And the likelihood of men investing is often dependent on them believing the child is theirs, since their paternity is not certain like that of a mother who carries and births the baby (emphasis added):
Patrilineal inheritance of family names is another social institution that emerged to convince the fathers of their paternity, by saying (if social institutions have a vocal cord) “The baby’s really yours, because it has your last name!” Russians take it one step further, by giving their children – both their sons and daughters – middle and last names after the father.
Fathers are therefore expected to invest more heavily in children who bear their last names than children who bear the mother’s last names, because they are more likely to be convinced of their paternity. As a result, ceteris paribus,children who inherit their last names from their fathers are expected to be more likely to survive and thrive than children who inherit their last names from their mothers.
Kanazawa also pointed out that some studies have shown babies are born looking more like the father than the mother potentially to trigger biological recognition by the father — even on a subconscious level — and support his paternity.
Carol Lloyd for Salon took up the issue of children taking the father’s last name in 2000 with similar conclusions to that of Kanazawa:
“Inheritance laws, political bodies, surnames — it’s all about compensating for men’s inability to give birth,” [political theorist Jackie] Stevens contends. “The surname remains the only way of showing legitimacy. Without it, there’s no certainty that the kid has a legal father.”
[...]
Yet it’s interesting that traditionally, the man shows his commitment to the child by giving his name, while the woman shows that same commitment by giving up her own. Why are so many men still so attached to their last names?
“Identification with the father,” says Chodorow. “I don’t think it’s any mystery. It’s the classic “in the name of the father” — in Lacanian psychoanalysis. The mother has the baby in utero but the name is how men get tied to their babies. The tie has to happen somehow that ‘This is my baby too.’ If she’s feeling generous, then this is a way to show it.”
The New York Times on the issue of complicated last names in the age of hyphenation and non-traditional couples gave this example of where the husband’s last name won out as well:
Zoe Segal-Reichlin, 33, a lawyer for Planned Parenthood in New York, was typical in her approach to naming her son, now 10 months old. She said she flirted with alternatives: hyphenating three names, picking either Segal or Reichlin to link with her husband’s name. But ultimately, none felt quite right, and going with the father’s name won out as the most practical choice.
“It was the best of bad options,” she told me.
The Times pointed to an early 2000s paper by a Penn State professor that believed the importance of a patrilineal last name would decline due to women keeping their maiden names, divorce, remarriages and same sex couples.
Still, as of 2011 a survey found that two-thirds of people believed women should take their husbands’ last names, in part because of the naming of future children. In the 1990s, women keeping maiden names rose to about 23 percent, based on one study, but that trend seemed to decline to 19 percent in the 2000s. A survey polling 19,000 women married in 2010 found only 8 percent maintained their maiden name.
Let us know what you think about children’s last names by taking our poll.
Featured image via Shutterstock.com.





















































































































Comments (146)
Noz
Feb. 20, 2013 at 9:41amBlood has and always will travel through the male. Spiritually speaking.
Report this comment
EgoLacuna
Feb. 20, 2013 at 11:10amIt’s actually the opposite biologically speaking. You have half of your father’s DNA, one-quarter of your grandfather, an eighth of his father, etc.. You can easily how quickly the male DNA from a family dilutes to almost nothing. In contrast, women pass mitochonrial DNA which remains virtually unchanged for thousands of generations. Your wife, daughter (or you if you are female) have the same maternal DNA as your ancestor in the time of Christ. Pretty cool stuff. However, if we wanted to make naming convention match up with what really happens, we should pass the mother’s name, not the father’s.
Report this comment
nomsain
Feb. 20, 2013 at 11:31amEgolacuna,…How wrong you are. The Y chromosome of the male can be traced back through many generations. This is precisely how modern geneologists develop their family tree. Since the Y chromosome and the last name is retained by male descendants, other than word of mouth or family bibles, there is no better way of doing it.
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Feb. 20, 2013 at 11:36amMitochondrial DNA codes for next to nothing. It’s like having a symbiotic bacteria living among your cells.
Report this comment
1956
Feb. 20, 2013 at 11:51amWhat gets passed down depends… according to Jewish tradition, a child is NOT as Jew if the mother is not a Jew. Traditionally speaking…
Report this comment
Rampart
Feb. 20, 2013 at 11:54amNone of the hyphenated-name proponents have stopped to think what’ll happen when members of the new hyphenate-name generation begin to marry one another. I can’t wait to see how they manage to plaster “Mekum-Jamal-Schonneberg-Harrison” on the backs if sports jerseys…
Report this comment
Silvertruth
Feb. 20, 2013 at 1:02pmNot really. Biblically, it’s patriarch based but modern Jewish tradition is matriarch based (still trying to figure that one out). So it’s a wash, religiously.
However, practically, most European heirships (and thus geneology) is patriarch based and thus the tracing of the male name is of precidence. This is the only reason I support naming of children (last name) after the father, to keep it easy to trace to older geneological data.
Hyphenation (no insult to those that practice it) is very difficult and very arbitrary in a geneological sense. At some point you have to drop names, so it’s really just a matter of ‘pride’ over not doing it right away. If you didn’t you’d have a Jane Smith-Jones(Oregon)-Waters-Rivers-Jefferson-Jones(North Virgina)-Lewis-Jacobson-Carter… ad naseum.
No, pick something that works and stick with it.
Report this comment
MrButcher
Feb. 20, 2013 at 1:09pmThe Y chromosome is passed on with virtually no variations.
Report this comment
Salamander
Feb. 20, 2013 at 2:37pmActually, in the Jewish tradition, it is the mother’s heritage that determines the heritage of the child. And, in Sweden, it used to be and may still be the mother’s name that is the family name! So, not all cultures see things the way we do.
Report this comment
jimmymac1
Feb. 20, 2013 at 3:28pmGee Eco how do you explaine my DNA being exactly the same back 8 generations that I can measure
Report this comment
TheMediaWolf
Feb. 20, 2013 at 3:55pmIt is Jewish tradition that children carry mother’s heritage, because, if you remember in the bible, God commanded the Jews not to intermarry or marry women from other nations. Why? Because when men went out into the field to work the mother would stay home and raise the child. The child would worship the same idols that his/her mother would worship. Then a whole generation of people would be subject to commit idolatry, therefore raising a rebellious nation against God.
Report this comment
Melika
Feb. 20, 2013 at 4:07pm@ Nomsain: Although the Y chromosome can be traced, it still changes throughout the generations. Mitochondrian DNA does not change and is present in both males and females, so the OP is correct. Direct lineage comes from the female line.
@ Jerk: while I enjoy your rants, you are wrong in this. Mitochondrial DNA codes for the only thing that keeps you alive – energy. Almost all body systems are designed for the production of energy, either directly producing it or in some support capacity. mDNA is the fountain that keeps you conscious.
Report this comment
SameSame
Feb. 20, 2013 at 4:19pmIt is how it always has been and always will be, regardless of the tinkering. The biology comments must take into consideration the tendencies of human behavior. If it was meant to be another way, it would. But it is not. The importance of the male in the family is so obvious to those who pay attention. Without it, and with a tilted maternal tendency, things just don’t work out so well.
Report this comment
turkey13
Feb. 20, 2013 at 4:50pmThe fact is all children, boys and girls are pops little squirts!
Report this comment
turkey13
Feb. 20, 2013 at 4:55pmMy father in-law offered me $10,000 to name one of my sons after my wife when he found out the only male heir to his name my nephew was a 17 year old Q_ueer. All of his brothers only had grand daughters. Thought tempting I broke his heart and turned him down.
Report this comment
PATTY HENRY
Feb. 20, 2013 at 5:15pmah, more subtle efforts to disintegrate the family… WHY have any name? Just take the assigned serial number and ad to it. Let the first numbers indicate the country, then the state, then the city born in,
the next the year and then the date…etc. GOOD GRIEF!!!
You dopey liberals…you are not going to make an imperfect world perfect. The only reason this place is here is to give us a choice…do we choose God or do we not? IF you really want HEAVEN you need to put a little effort into learning about GOD…then you’ll get your PERFECT.
Report this comment
Quiata
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:00pm@EGOLACUNA Yes, you are correct. But from a *social* perspective, a woman does not experience the same need for connecting with the child because A WOMAN KNOWS THE CHILD IS HERS… IT CAME DIRECTLY OUT OF HER BODY (sorry for the all-caps, no italics or bold type available). On the other hand, *paternal* uncertainty creates a certain amount of anxiety.
In the past, a man could never be 100% sure that the child was his…so it’s out of a sense of RESPECT, TRUST, and DUTY that we assign that man’s children his name. They are HIS responsibility.
That is what makes a *successful* society cohesive: paternal investment in offspring over many generations.
Less successful societies are characterized by “fatherless” children and abandoned families.
Report this comment
Zee_Obama_In_Zee_PeePee_By_Zee_Glenn_Beck
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:14pm“Why Kids Inherit Dad’s Last Name Instead of Mom’s — You Might Not Have Considered the Reasons Before”
Oh, yes we have:
22 Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord.
23 For the husband is head of the wife, as also Christ is head of the church;
. and He is the Savior of the body.
24 Therefore, just as the church is subject to Christ, so let the wives be to their
. own husbands in everything.
…
33 Nevertheless let each one of you in particular so love his own wife as himself,
. and let the wife see that she respects her husband.
[Ephesians 5, Holy Bible]
Report this comment
JQP
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:36pmI believe that all babies born in this generation should have the last name “government”, because that’s who their REAL Daddy’s going to be as this nation slips quickly into INCREASED immorality, depravity, and political correctness. As the old saying goes:
“Give your soul to God because your ass is mine –The Govenment.
Report this comment
1_Smoot_Tall
Feb. 20, 2013 at 11:02pmWoman need to shut up and do as their told.
Report this comment
EgoLacuna
Feb. 21, 2013 at 10:01amInteresting responses! We really don’t know how mitochondrial DNA may function. It definitely doesn’t act like nucleic DNA, but it only has been a few decades since we started noticing its existence at all.
Report this comment
jblaze
Feb. 21, 2013 at 5:47pmTheMediaWolf
“It is Jewish tradition that children carry mother’s “heritage”" Yes, heritage, however, the name goes through the father. If you check your bible, geneology is recorded through the fathers, save for Mary, Christ’s mother, which is recorded. The rest of what you say is exactly correct.
Report this comment
raybojabo
Feb. 20, 2013 at 9:40amGee, and I thought it was to help prevent inbred flipper kids.
Report this comment
gyro
Feb. 20, 2013 at 11:51amme to
Report this comment
Qtaug
Feb. 20, 2013 at 2:15pmExactly!
Report this comment
Inappropriately_Conceived
Feb. 20, 2013 at 9:38amWell this seems to be another misplaced HUFF-PO piece ? No ?
Regarding illegitimate births … if the mother is unmarried the child should only have his mother’s maiden name placed on the birth certificate as the surname. Unless the unmarried father signs a paternity decree and agrees the child can have his last name. Otherwise, if the child is not of the father’s family, the child should not have the father’s SURNAME.
In some States this is the law, but not in CALIFORNIA. There a mother may declare anyone to be the father, put his name on the birth certificate by falsely claiming that he is her husband and then steal the ma’s last name for their illegitimate child. You can’t believe the number of women who have falsely claimed George Clooney or Brad Pitt as their legal husband and have inappropriately named their bastard children after these men. Of course the Vital Records Office of CA. doesn’t prosecute these parasitic deviants for perjury or force compliance with STATE laws to not corrupt the integrity of Public Records. Which are felonies. But women in CA. are not held accountable for their blatant violations of the law. They hide behind the mask of motherhood, as a free pass to be sociopaths.
Report this comment
Walkabout
Feb. 20, 2013 at 5:53pmInteresting. Can you link an article of such cases?
Report this comment
Jezreel
Feb. 20, 2013 at 9:35amEven Jeshua the Christ took on his Father’s name.
Report this comment
Brooke Lorren
Feb. 20, 2013 at 11:50pmChrist means “Messiah”. It wasn’t Joseph’s last name. He was known as Jesus “of Nazareth” because they didn’t have last names back then. Of Nazareth just let people know from where they were from.
Report this comment
TulsaYeeHaw
Feb. 21, 2013 at 12:07amGaius Julius Caeser did.
Report this comment
JohnJoseph
Feb. 20, 2013 at 9:33amThe answer to the last name is “spiritual”. If you believe Jesus (God the Son) was born of the Virgin Mary than you know that Joseph was not Jesus’ true father. Mary was conceived by (God the Holy Ghost) making (God the Father) Jesus’ true father. Therefore, the seed of Jesus did not come from Joseph but from God. A woman only feeds the baby thru the emblical cord (no blood passes from the mother to the child). The blood line comes from the man. We get our “sin nature” from Adam (the man) not from Eve (the woman).
1 Corinthians 15:22 says: For as in Adam the man all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.
Therefore, the reason that a child gets the father’s last name is because from the father comes the nature of the child.
If you want to read more about this, I recommend a great book is by a Dr. DeHaan called “The Chemistry of the Blood”!
Report this comment
llleslie
Feb. 20, 2013 at 11:38amExcuse me – if no blood passes from mother to child then how is the blood “passing” from father to child? Are you trying to pass off that sperm carries blood and eggs do not? Or is that “spiritual” too?! Explain how, in monogamous marriages, couples with multiple children – some of the children have the same blood type as mom and others as dad? You can keep your book recommendation!
Report this comment
right_is_right
Feb. 20, 2013 at 4:08pm@LLLeslie: Chill out. It’s a recommendation that not you nor anyone else has to look into – interested people looking to challenge, deepen, or broaden their personal views will likely find intellectual arguments appealing, even if they don’t agree.
This is a metaphysical concept, not purely biological.
I was glad to have my father’s name, because it showed that he claimed me and was present for my childhood/birth. Taking the dad completely out of the equation is asinine. I think that changing how kids receive surnames will create conflict in schools already troubled by bullies. If giving kids a father’s surname is sexist, shouldn’t we be angry when a major athlete (football player, i.e.) looks into the camera and says, “Hi Mom!”? There’s no recognition of paternity…
because that issue is stupid. If it isn’t broken, don’t break it.
Report this comment
FenrisAmarok
Feb. 21, 2013 at 12:47amSo if the patrilineal surnaming started with the Bible, then why, for CENTURIES, did last names change with each generation? The Anglicans favored this highly, with last names often telling where a person was from.
Report this comment
IndyGuy
Feb. 20, 2013 at 9:25am“the likelihood of men investing is often dependent on them believing the child is theirs, since their paternity is not certain like that of a mother who carries and births the baby”
How about just not bedding with a slut???
Report this comment
The_Jerk
Feb. 20, 2013 at 9:41amAs the saying goes, “You never know who’s doing who.”
Report this comment
SFsuper49er
Feb. 20, 2013 at 9:17amIn today’s society, The mother gives the baby her last name as convenience because she knows within 6 months she knows she will be a single parent anyway…
Report this comment
fastgen1
Feb. 20, 2013 at 9:24amYes this is true, and, she will be out of work, and on food stamps….And even though the father pays support, she continues to stop him from seeing the baby…..And if she could, she would vote for obammy again….
Report this comment
missdagnytaggart
Feb. 21, 2013 at 11:27pmMakes sense. I know a lot of women who had babies out of wedlock and gave the child the father’s last name and now the father is hardly involved. IMHO if the mother and father aren’t married, the child shouldn’t get the fathers last name.
Report this comment
andrew36
Feb. 20, 2013 at 9:15amOf course it had nothing to do with the fact that all those years ago woman were 2nd class citizens and males were the dominant sex, that been the case of course the woman would take the mans surname as would the children.
Report this comment
Vision Harry
Feb. 20, 2013 at 9:01amDog, dog, dog eat dog.
Report this comment
Dano.50
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:56amDon’t know how accurate the report was, and I read it years ago is some magazine so I’ll never find it but…
Once people started DNA testing their kids for genetic diseases, it was found that about 1% of the kids did not belong to said daddy.
It’s a fairly high number when you consider that those messing around are probably far more careful about getting pregnant, and blew the percentage ratios on male/female infidelity.
Report this comment
john vincent
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:51amI’m sure Ms Savant thinks Hillary RODHAM Clinton is the cats meow- And ask her, she will tell you she is more Rodham than Clinton-
Sorry but there is a verifiable element of suspicion in any marriage where the woman keeps her name; I suppose there are instances where this is useful, (few and far between) but the writer here (as pointed out by other posters) is on to something far beyond culture and tradition that speaks of the importance of the man as HEAD……as defined by God, scripture, nature, and common sense.
‘Let the girls keep the mothers name, while the boys keep the fathers?’ Are you serious? There truly must be a defect in the liberal mind
Report this comment
fastgen1
Feb. 20, 2013 at 9:26amHillary also has a female muslim lover. Now you know why she kept her name
Report this comment
God_Is_Not
Feb. 20, 2013 at 9:33amYou think very highly of yourself. My apologies to any of the women who happen to be associated with you.
I can assure you a significant portion of this country does not hold you in such high regard and repudiate your perceived god given ‘authority’.
Report this comment
Calm Voice of Reason
Feb. 20, 2013 at 10:41amI’ll grant you God and scripture, but nature and common sense do not support your claims.
Report this comment
HowTruthHurts
Feb. 20, 2013 at 10:55amSo true. God, scripture, nature, and common sense support your claims.
Report this comment
john vincent
Feb. 20, 2013 at 11:09am-calm
If God and scripture prove our topic, then nature must follow as well as common sense.
-God is Creator of nature , no?
then what is NATURAL as to his idea of headship, (man-woman) as scripture affirms, and as you have already agreed, must be common sense to obey
Joe and Mary are twins. They are in first grade, Teacher calls upon Joe Smith, then his sister Mary Brown. Common sense? C’mon calm, you are better than that.
It appears the main point here is headship, I believe it is that simple, so yes, it is common sense for me to agree with God.
fyi- The book of proverbs is replete with truth and common sense, not necessarily spiritual; ie, ‘beware of strong drink,’ common sense. ‘He that watcheth clouds is not wise,’ (idleness) Pr. 31 about the virtuous woman, who speaks of her husband…… do you really think she praises him, with a different name than hers….? again, not necessarily spiritual.
Report this comment
Spur
Feb. 21, 2013 at 12:45amIn many families it’s traditional for girls to not have a “middle” name at birth. Rather, the woman’s maiden name becomes her “middle” name upon marriage. This is NOT the same as a hyphenated name. This actually reflects a more traditional, respectful approach to a woman’s family heritage.
That said . . . please consider this NO defense of Hilary Clinton – i.e. Barbara Pierce Bush’s family also followed the tradition. There’s plenty wrong with the Clinton alpha female, but her name’s not one of ‘em.
Report this comment
DZ-015
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:48amIn many European countries names of children must come from an officially authorized list. Recently in Iceland, a couple had to go to court to give their daughter the name they had chosen. Family names are a relatively recent invention (Middle Ages), but they serve to trace lineage and provide fascinating insights into the origin of a particular line. Somewhere back in time a man owned a wagon for hire, and we ended up with Jimmy Carter as President. In Germany or Austria, a man worked in an iron mine and we wound up with Dwight Eisenhower. Another man lived in an English cathedral city, and we got Abe Lincoln. Woodrow Wilson, Andrew Jackson, Andrew Johnson, and Lyndon Johnson, all had patronymic family names, kind of like the Russians do with their middle monikers. In addition to the findings in this article, which seem to be reasonable, why mess with a naming system which has served us well for over 600 years?
Report this comment
wmcritter
Feb. 20, 2013 at 9:23amWhy mess with a good system? Because we are the narcissist generation. Everything is about me, me, me. Screw society, screw tradition, screw common sense. I’m going to be a special snow flake and name my child for my own ridiculous reasons and cause them endless grief and trauma. My child will have an insane name because the child is not important, I am, and I feel special by giving them the stupidest name possible. It is ALL about me, me, me.
Report this comment
diablosho
Feb. 20, 2013 at 10:25amWMCritter…you mean a name like “Shaquanaquita”? ROFLMAO!!!
Report this comment
jungle J
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:27amSooner than anyone thinks it will be legal to have sex with children and to sell them. Only the sane understand what is happening in the shadows developed by the degenerates.
Report this comment
Gonzo
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:36amI need to re read the article, I missed all that.
Report this comment
Eastinfection
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:38amIn Egypt you can have sex with dead children… but only if you marry them first.
Report this comment
The-Monk
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:43amOh East…..
You forgot the main part of that Sharia Law….. only up to 6 hours after they die.
That makes it all OK.
(end sarcasm)
Report this comment
stage9
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:50amI understand where you’re coming from Jungle even if others can’t. There’s already a push by homosexuals to remove all references to “sex/gender” in regard to children and marriage licenses. Radicals have worked very hard to undermine the sanctity of marriage and the enduring nature of the traditional family, why not remove the time honored patrilineal inheritance of the father’s name? The slippery slope you’re alluding to is already underway even if the many blind drones around us can’t see it.
Massachusetts state education officials release directive to force transgenderism into all schools
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen2/13a/trans_school_regs_021513/index.html
Report this comment
Robert Hawk
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:24amBasing the family name upon the male has its basis in biblical text. Since the United States was founded by members of the House of Israel, the tradition would carry foreword from that point. Using the fathers “family name” has little to do with the father being the traditional wage earner, it has everything to do with the law written in the book of Leviticus. Other cultures which were not based upon Levitical law, have historically aligned the family with the dominant and responsible male’s family.
With the current assimilation in the United States, toward philosophia doctrine based systems such as Marxism, which use applied dialectics, its easy to understand where this question came from. During the several stages of Marxist based subversion, the traditions of the people are attacked and divided or eliminated through the use of applied dialectics. This specific question is no different as it has as its base the dialectical struggle between man (thesis) and woman (anti-thesis).
Report this comment
Welcome Black Carter
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:50amThank you. That makes alot more sense than all the dung written in the article.
Report this comment
God_Is_Not
Feb. 20, 2013 at 9:25amI’m delighted to know dialectics have consistently won out over tradition during the short history of this country.
Report this comment
JUSTMYOPINION
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:22amSignificant but oft-overlooked point: women got their names from their fathers (or their grandfathers in the case where maiden names have already been used), so regardless of the name selection the child will get the name of a male family member. There is no undoing it. If a woman wants to have her own last name with no patriarchy attached, she’d have to make one up.
Report this comment
Eastinfection
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:14amThis still doesn’t explain why George Foreman named all five of his sons “George Foreman”.
Report this comment
huey6367
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:36amToo many punches to the head
Report this comment
right field
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:08amGood luck getting any of the “Free For Me” generation(s) to care if a child even has a last name. Most first names are enough to make one want to avoid knowing a last name.
When a country has no culture, no traditions, no common language, no religion, no morals, no respect for families or fathers, and no concern for rights or freedom – does it matter what a child is named?
How about everyone getting an official ‘Federal Name’, which is taxed, based on the parent(s) income at the time of birth! We have a ‘death tax’ – why not have a ‘birth tax’ as well? The Marxist Democrats could really stick it to the 1% who want to have children! Get on that BHO!
Report this comment
DREDGE
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:28amAnd that would be call social security number!!!
Report this comment
diablosho
Feb. 20, 2013 at 10:28amDude…you hit the nail on the head. That’s terrifying…have a baby, and the Government gives you a menu of names to pick from for your baby, and then taxes you according to your income level every year for the “privelege” of that name…it’s so scary because I can EASILY see it happening…
Report this comment
Polarized America
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:04am.
….♫.. What’s your Name little Girl..What’s your name..♫
Report this comment
tnman65
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:22amThe po-leece said we can’t drink in the bar, what a shame.
Report this comment
Gonzo
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:34amWhy don’t you come upstairs and have a drink of champagne!
Report this comment
SpankDaMonkey
Feb. 20, 2013 at 7:56am.
So do Baby Mamas give their Ankle Biters the Baby Daddy last name?…..
Did you know the definition of Mass Confusion is Fathers Day in a Black neighbor…..
Report this comment
biohazard23
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:11amSpank!!! Holy cow… LOL!
I thought mass confusion was defined as Father’s Day on the Maury Povich show….
Report this comment
Inform
Feb. 20, 2013 at 10:02amhehe.. Actually in that case, they can have a block party and at least one of each is going to be someone’s father.
Report this comment
spirited
Feb. 20, 2013 at 5:50pm“blockparty”
> family reunion?
Report this comment
woodyee
Feb. 20, 2013 at 7:54amSo…
What happens if the mailman that, say, for example, one of the Kardashian’s is playing with has the same last name as her husband, and she gets pregnant?
Celebrity Deathmatch?
Report this comment
DougHuffman
Feb. 20, 2013 at 7:45amIdiot vos Savant.
Report this comment
TEXASGRANNY73
Feb. 20, 2013 at 7:43amAbout half this column is all I could stomach this early in am. Why in the world would anyone care in the USA about what Russians do? Really? If it isn’t about our kids competing with China in education, now a silly column about name sakes? But, to add my 2 cents it has been a tradition until the women’s movement and having babies out of wedlock that all members have the father’s name. The only exception I would ever use to change my name is if it were akin to Lee Harvey Oswald or Hitler and those of infamy that causation to protect myself and family.
Report this comment
From Virginia
Feb. 20, 2013 at 11:39amI agree with you and absolutely DESPISE those stupid women from the 60′s and 70′s. How ignorant can you get not to KNOW that the whole tradition of marriage was put in place to PROTECT women.
Report this comment
truthhasno
Feb. 20, 2013 at 7:35amGods Design and pattern is the fathers line establishes the bloodline
dating back to genesis – Does anyone actually read their bible or is it
Just a handy book to stop the desk wobbling
Report this comment
huntinwabbits
Feb. 20, 2013 at 7:57amMy thoughts exactly. This is a big article basically saying that there is social proof that a father being a father is good for the child. God has been saying this all along. Maybe if we “discovered” this before the number of children without fathers grow up, we could have prevented a lot of crime. God was right. Who would have thunk it?
Report this comment
Gonzo
Feb. 20, 2013 at 7:34amIf you are born illegitimately, you drop your adopted father’s last name, take the last name of the father that abandoned you, then change your American first name to something very foreign sounding. Then you run for POTUS and everyone in the media loves and protects you.
Report this comment
Eastinfection
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:11amand eat dog, too.
You must eat dog for the tradition to be complete.
Report this comment
Gonzo
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:20amAh yes, Peking Pomeranian with Hoisin sauce. MMM, MMM ,MMM!
Report this comment
Fubared
Feb. 20, 2013 at 8:30amStray in satay.
Report this comment
Schteveo
Feb. 20, 2013 at 9:34amDoberman Adobo.
German Chocolate Shepard.
Report this comment
MCON29
Feb. 20, 2013 at 10:06amZoe Segal-Reichlin, 33, a lawyer for Planned Parenthood in New York, was typical in her approach to naming her son, now 10 months old.
Some day that boy will realize how lucky he is to be alive.
Report this comment
RightThinking1
Feb. 20, 2013 at 11:37amOh, man…, my digestive tract is still recovering from a Shih Tzu dessert I had at an Indonesian restaurant ..
Report this comment
objectivetruth
Feb. 20, 2013 at 12:41pmDoes cat enter the picture?You know simmered siamese deep fried persion.Lets us not forget roasted american shorthair.Little onion garlic celery salt pepper.Yum Yum
NOTE TO EVERYONE THIS IS A JOKE SATIRE.
I’d rather eat one of y’alls arms off than my fluffy furry cats.I also am not into canniblism either.I figured I might want to add that before the freaks come out and start accusing me of it.You know the ones, they have all the personality of a dead polecat.
Report this comment
circleDwagons
Feb. 20, 2013 at 7:30amWhos your daddy?
Report this comment