Regardless of how you feel about last name changes based on marriage, there are arguments in favor of children always taking on the father’s last name that you might not have thought about before.

(Photo: Shutterstock.com)
Satoshi Kanazawa for Big Think wrote that although it might actually make a whole lot of sense for women to keep their maiden name, children should always take the father’s name. But why? Why not, as Parade’s Marilyn vos Savant suggests, let boys take their father’s name and girl’s their mother’s name?
Kanazawa’s main point as to why not is the fact of investment on the part of the father that generally results in greater survival of the child. And the likelihood of men investing is often dependent on them believing the child is theirs, since their paternity is not certain like that of a mother who carries and births the baby (emphasis added):
Patrilineal inheritance of family names is another social institution that emerged to convince the fathers of their paternity, by saying (if social institutions have a vocal cord) “The baby’s really yours, because it has your last name!” Russians take it one step further, by giving their children – both their sons and daughters – middle and last names after the father.
Fathers are therefore expected to invest more heavily in children who bear their last names than children who bear the mother’s last names, because they are more likely to be convinced of their paternity. As a result, ceteris paribus,children who inherit their last names from their fathers are expected to be more likely to survive and thrive than children who inherit their last names from their mothers.
Kanazawa also pointed out that some studies have shown babies are born looking more like the father than the mother potentially to trigger biological recognition by the father — even on a subconscious level — and support his paternity.
Carol Lloyd for Salon took up the issue of children taking the father’s last name in 2000 with similar conclusions to that of Kanazawa:
“Inheritance laws, political bodies, surnames — it’s all about compensating for men’s inability to give birth,” [political theorist Jackie] Stevens contends. “The surname remains the only way of showing legitimacy. Without it, there’s no certainty that the kid has a legal father.”
[...]
Yet it’s interesting that traditionally, the man shows his commitment to the child by giving his name, while the woman shows that same commitment by giving up her own. Why are so many men still so attached to their last names?
“Identification with the father,” says Chodorow. “I don’t think it’s any mystery. It’s the classic “in the name of the father” — in Lacanian psychoanalysis. The mother has the baby in utero but the name is how men get tied to their babies. The tie has to happen somehow that ‘This is my baby too.’ If she’s feeling generous, then this is a way to show it.”
The New York Times on the issue of complicated last names in the age of hyphenation and non-traditional couples gave this example of where the husband’s last name won out as well:
Zoe Segal-Reichlin, 33, a lawyer for Planned Parenthood in New York, was typical in her approach to naming her son, now 10 months old. She said she flirted with alternatives: hyphenating three names, picking either Segal or Reichlin to link with her husband’s name. But ultimately, none felt quite right, and going with the father’s name won out as the most practical choice.
“It was the best of bad options,” she told me.
The Times pointed to an early 2000s paper by a Penn State professor that believed the importance of a patrilineal last name would decline due to women keeping their maiden names, divorce, remarriages and same sex couples.
Still, as of 2011 a survey found that two-thirds of people believed women should take their husbands’ last names, in part because of the naming of future children. In the 1990s, women keeping maiden names rose to about 23 percent, based on one study, but that trend seemed to decline to 19 percent in the 2000s. A survey polling 19,000 women married in 2010 found only 8 percent maintained their maiden name.
Let us know what you think about children’s last names by taking our poll.
Featured image via Shutterstock.com.


















































































































Comments (146)
TeslanEdison
Feb. 20, 2013 at 4:28pmHmm okay, so the argument is about women giving their husbands name to their child, so they want to give the name of their father to the children, or wait, their mother’s maiden name which is then their Grandfather’s name on their mother’s side… hmm seems like some women are completely out of touch with reality. A name is about all a man has these days, a decent woman should give him that at least, and drop this garbage about naming the child after some other male from her history. The whole concept of screwing the the names and identity figures into the socialist agenda, women were already in-charge before they were “liberated”. The vast majority of men in American history took cue from their wives, unless they didn’t like to have sex with them, and generally invited scorn and contempt on a daily basis. Women already have vast “POWERS” any further notion is about the socialist agenda creating a communist empire with a wealthy aristocracy over all. Think hunger games, but real.
Report this comment
pjr12345
Feb. 20, 2013 at 3:54pmIf this is the best contribution Satoshi Kanazawa has made to society, why on earth did folks create a holiday just for him? I’m all for celebrating anything that gives me another paid holiday, but don’t you think our standards are slipping?
Report this comment
Benetto
Feb. 20, 2013 at 3:23pmIn doing genealogy, it would be helpful if they had put both names. However, I feel that the father’s name is the true last name
Report this comment
Margyt
Feb. 20, 2013 at 3:15pmThe confusion over names was predictable when the self-indulgent feminist movement started. It is encouraging to know that two thirds of babies still get their fathers names. The number of hyphenated names is relatively small, so I guess we can just let them sort out their own confusion. It made no difference to me whether I changed my name when I got married or not and following the conventions sure made our life together easier. I think, though, that the issues raised in this article are important. How much of the breakdown in the family can be attributed to the psychology that went behind this being an issue in the first place? We told guys we didn’t need them and being the clever people they are, the guys took us at our word. The law of unintended consequences took over and here we are today. Free sex that only becomes expensive for the “consequences” of that sex….the kids who grow up alone and/or in poverty unable to form relationships, bereft of a sense of personal history.
Report this comment
WakWak
Feb. 20, 2013 at 2:33pmMy wife’s middle name is her mother’s maiden name. Her mother’s middle name was her mother’s maiden name. All of my children carry my last name and my wife’s maiden name as their middle name. While it is part of my wife’s culture to name children in this manner, I thought it just makes sense to continue the tradition and I will encourage my children to do the same.
It easy to trace the family tree this way. If you have a common name and meet someone with the same last name you can compare notes so you don’t marry your cousin.
Report this comment
spirited
Feb. 20, 2013 at 6:10pmBINGO !!!!!! –ding ding ding
Report this comment
LameLiberals
Feb. 20, 2013 at 2:27pmThere are over the counter DNA tests now.
If the reason for a child to have the father’s surname was to re-enforce genetic paternity – that reason is gone. Any doubts – it is simple to check it out – especially if divorced and stuck paying child support – on a child that turns out not to be yours.
Report this comment
independentvoteril
Feb. 20, 2013 at 2:10pmMy last name is hyphenated (although the man I am currently married to is NOT the father of my kids… my kids ALL have their fathers last name…) I can tell you there were times when they DIDN’T want their fathers last name.. even though we were married this man had NO kind of special bonding because they had his last name and THAT you can ask my kids.. NOW my daughter has named her kids giving them BOTH her and her husbands last name.. not hyphenated.. just they have 4 name and the last 2 are her last name and her husbands.. my son in law is VERY bonded to both his kids (one boy one girl) as is my daughter.. this MIGHT be very good answer to bonding of families..
Report this comment
bobad
Feb. 20, 2013 at 1:43pmIf you don’t take your father’s name, how in hell can the family keep track of lineage and keep a decent genealogy records the next 1000 years? Think about that before your kids and grandkids get embarrassed some day.
Report this comment
adrefs
Feb. 20, 2013 at 1:31pmThis is after all how God intended things to be. He intended that men would lead their families, not abandon them. He intended that we would be priests in our homes and sources of light in our communities. The world is in the state that it is in because men have failed to follow instructions. The corruption, dictatorships, wars and strife are almost entirely the fault of men NOT being what God intended for them to be. Scripture says that the two shall become one and that the man shall be the leader of the household. Not a tyrant, bully or overlord, but a leader with compassion and the love of God directing his every move. IF this were the case then the entire world would indeed be a better place. That and getting rid of Obama of course!
Report this comment
Alternative_Thought
Feb. 20, 2013 at 1:31pmI got an idea lets do it like God wants us to do it and quite rationalizing our way into more stupidity.
Isaiah 3:12
Report this comment
paperpushermj
Feb. 20, 2013 at 1:29pmI’m blown away by the 29% that voted ” It doesn’t Matter” !!!!
If any of you care to explain… What are You Thinking” ?
Report this comment
JEANNIEMAC
Feb. 20, 2013 at 12:38pmWhy not use the mother’s name as the middle name? As far as I know, a woman does not lose her maiden name, she adds on the husband’s name.
Report this comment
Soul Leister
Feb. 20, 2013 at 12:57pmAny change in the ‘accepted’ way we do things now will result in all forms being changed from (last name, first name and middle name or initial) to accomadate:
Maria Rosa Concetta deJesus Ramirez Faggliotta Juan Jarez Rio Columbiana Williamson Jr. III
Report this comment
Soul Leister
Feb. 20, 2013 at 1:00pm… choose wisely, names have meanings
~ so spake “The Diddler” aka “Silver Tongued Buttlicker”
Report this comment
Soul Leister
Feb. 20, 2013 at 1:03pm…which ones are the mom’s and which ones are the dad’s??? Much to do about nothing truely important.
Report this comment
Soul Leister
Feb. 20, 2013 at 1:09pmMaybe we all should be given (one up) numbers instead of names (names are regulated to nicknames only)… and by be given numbers not stolen Connecticutt social security numbers like Obama and his mother have been using (how did he get a social security number from a state he never resided in??? It must be another fraud attached to him).
Report this comment
Soul Leister
Feb. 20, 2013 at 1:11pm…and by regulated I meant relagated…
Report this comment
ImChiquita
Feb. 20, 2013 at 12:37pmWhy does the child take on the father’s name?
Because what started the entire process in the first place, the world over, is Adam begatting Cain, Abel, Seth, and on and on.
The surname is masculine for a reason.
“The seed of Abraham…”
“The throne of David….”
“The Son of God…”
Report this comment
Soul Leister
Feb. 20, 2013 at 12:36pmNo greater proof of this is:
Barrack Hussain Obmam II (the second not junior), when his mother divorced her polygamist husband (then with three wifes) little Barry’s mom did not seek child support of any kind (the divorce papers are on line) and that is because little Barry’s suffix indicates he was merely named after Barak (that is how Barry’s dad actuall spelled his name) and Barak was not actually his father (or he would have “JUNIOR” for a suffix (feel free to check Emily Post)… the Judge (being a educated man knew what naming conventions mean.
…oh yeah, little Barry’s mom concealed the fact that her husband was not a citizen (he was a British subject… a Kenyan… never an American)… had the court known that it would have had to admit it does not have jurisdiction.
…the court directed little Barry’s mom to notify the husband and if you look at the bogus air mail receipt (A) there was no way in the early 1960′s to send mail from Hawaii to east coast (where he was attending school) and back in a day; and (b) the forged signature is not spelled correctly (nor does it match any exemplars of Barak Obama (Senior)… its one fraud after another with this family, AND THAT IS A FACT.
Report this comment
The Third Archon
Feb. 20, 2013 at 12:28pm“WHY KIDS INHERIT DAD’S LAST NAME INSTEAD OF MOM’S — YOU MIGHT NOT HAVE CONSIDERED THE REASONS BEFORE”
Patriarchy–pure and simple.
“Kanazawa’s main point as to why not is the fact of investment on the part of the father that generally results in greater survival of the child. And the likelihood of men investing is often dependent on them believing the child is theirs, since their paternity is not certain like that of a mother who carries and births the baby (emphasis added):”
Ah, so because men are, apparently, selfish and uninterested in their children you have to give them extra motivation to care about them by affixing a label to them that, it is presumed, they have sentimental attachment to.
Report this comment
Mapache
Feb. 20, 2013 at 12:26pmto have the father’s name you might need to know who it is. That could be a problem for some.
of course if they name is derived from who is supporting the child, many children should have the name “Taxpayer.”
Report this comment
TEIN
Feb. 20, 2013 at 12:07pmHow about this reason…I joined with my wife to become a family….one unit…Husband and wife…to identify my family my wife, took on my sire name….Now, we are a family united under one name…..When we had children, one of the first thing they received from the family, besides life was a name…which at that moment, provided the child with an identity and a heritage….the child could know who it was with whom life was given and a heritage of traditions and family members to share life with….I already owned the responsibility of any children the moment I was married and committed to my then created family…what a bunch of academic social puke that this article spewed…. Understand, when you create a family you have created a nation that is how powerful marriage and family is…. and why neither should be redefined…
Report this comment
1956
Feb. 20, 2013 at 11:54amI never thought it was important to have my husband’s last name (I really liked my maiden name a lot) unless we were to have kids… and that’s how I put it to him. He was fine with that. Then… 11 years later, we adopted. Now I have his, not for him so much as to confirm to our girls that we are a family with one name. It brings unity into the family unit. (It also helps that we love each other and are bonded strongly one to another.)
Report this comment
nomsain
Feb. 20, 2013 at 11:44amIt is not one world. In the Philippines, and perhaps other countries, children are given the fathers last name but then, they are given the mothers maiden name as a middle name. Thus, all children in a family carry the same middle and last name, odd, no? Only their first names are different. Also, most girls who are Catholic, have an additional first name, “Maria”, added in front of their first given name. Should a parent in the Philippines try to buck this “rule”, they will meet great opposition from govt. employees and others.
Report this comment
RushEcho2
Feb. 20, 2013 at 11:32amSince I am the oldest son, of the oldest son, of the oldest son,
I have the middle name of my father’s first name (as does he)
and my son has as his middle name, my first name.
My grandson follows the pattern, but we are not Russian.
That makes five generations for us.
Before Carrie Lynnette Sims would accept my proposal for marriage,
I had to understand the oldest daughter would have ‘Carrie’ as the
first name. Our granddaughter is seventh in the line.
God Bless! FYI, C/L http://ShippAhoy.blogspot.com
Report this comment
scrapadapolis
Feb. 20, 2013 at 11:15amWell if thats the case tell sheneka baby daddy the baby will have his last name and maybe he might step up and get a real job and get baby and babys mama off the system.Yea right this must have come from cash straped california.But last I heard blacks cant read in cali due to the dropout rate of 60%of blacks at the ripe old age of 10.
Report this comment
iluv2bfree
Feb. 20, 2013 at 11:02amBiden needs to head a committee to look deeper into this. Seems sexist and unfair, even slightly racist and homophobic.
Report this comment
spirited
Feb. 20, 2013 at 10:50amProperty identification
Report this comment
B-Neil
Feb. 20, 2013 at 10:25amWe use to have socual norms and accepted practices. Useless people want to change things to get attenchen. Thats OK. Some change is good, some is not so good. All in all we should hold on to our NORMS, MORES and PRACTICES. I know my place in life. I know I have a say. Without wisdom my say is irrelevant. Becouse I did’nt stand up I lost some of my freedom. Anybody seen it layong arround anywhere??
Report this comment
spirited
Feb. 20, 2013 at 11:09amSurnames of children of homosexual and transgendered couples warrant a few new questions.
Two females: One has invetro by anonymous sperm donor
Two females: One has invetro by a known sperm donor
Two females: One mates with male for conception purposes only
Two females: Adopt somone else’s offspring
Two males: One provides sperm to a surrogate female
Two males: Adopt somone else’s offspring
>The above noted does not pertain to children of the divorced hetrosexual
Report this comment
.rjk
Feb. 20, 2013 at 10:12amObama’a people should read this article.
Report this comment