Developing: Pakistani Plane Escorted by UK Fighter Jets — 2 Men Arrested

Doc Thompson’s 24-hour radio marathon, ‘#24forok,’ continues until 9 am ET — Listen Live!

Politics

S.E. Cupp Pulls Out of CPAC Until Groups Representing Gay Republicans Are Embraced

Feb. 26, 2013 3:39pm Jason Howerton

(TheBlazeTV)

TheBlaze TV’s S.E. Cupp on Tuesday announced she is pulling out of CPAC until the annual conservative gathering welcomes GOP groups that support gay marriage. Two prominent groups representing gay Republicans, GOProud and Log Cabin Republicans, will reportedly not be in attendance at CPAC.

“I go to CPAC every year. I love speaking there. It’s a great opportunity for conservatives, young and old from all over the world, to get together and sort of touch base,” Cupp said on MSNBC’s “The Cycle.”

CPAC has reportedly permitted groups advocating for gay marriage to attend, however, they are unable to sponsor the event. Cupp said that is a bit of a “cop-out” on the issue.

“We should be lucky to be having these guys do any work instead of turning them away. I don’t think we can afford that right now,” she said.”

“Ive been thinking about this a lot, and I know a lot of people on my side of the aisle have been struggling with this for some time now too,” she added. “I’ve been scheduled to speak at CPAC this year, and I don’t think I can until this issue is reconciled and figured out.”

Cupp said Republicans are divided on gay marriage, an issue that the party can “no longer seem to avoid.” She explained that several Republicans, including four former governors, have signed a legal brief arguing that gays have a constitutional right to marry. The brief will be submitted to the Supreme Court this week in support of a lawsuit to overturn California’s Prop 8, which limited marriage to the union of a man and a woman.

Cupp told TheBlaze that she has “enjoyed a wonderful relationship with CPAC for years” and even called the annual event “a highlight” of her year.

“But as a proponent of gay rights, CPAC’s decision to sideline GOProud and Log Cabin Republicans makes me increasingly uncomfortable,” she said. “These are conservatives who have had to work doubly hard to advance conservative messages and we should be rewarding them with positions of prominence.”

She continued: “Further in the interest of inclusion, it strikes me that now more than ever we should be celebrating our intellectual diversity, not suppressing it. It seems like we’re hardly in a position to be marginalizing any kinds of conservatives, let alone ones who have been so courageous in the face of adversity.”

Cupp said CPAC has every right to offer sponsorships and speaking opportunities to whomever it wants, “but until the conference stops shaming some of its most valuable advocates, it’s unfortunately not an event I can take part in.”

This story has been updated

In CONTROL, Glenn Beck presents a passionate, fact-based case for guns that reveals why gun control isn’t really about controlling guns at all; it’s about controlling us. Find out more HERE.

Back to The Blaze »

Comments (854)

Sil in CNY
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:57pm
Um, SE…..its a CONSERVATIVE gatherin, not Republican…..

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- cessna152
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:32pm
  So Rome is burning, Conservatism and freedom is out of that pan and free falling into the fire and this is what you’re concerned about S.E.? Really? My goodness SE, I guess if my family is in danger and my house is on fire, I’ll make sure to have a press release about “gay fairness” instead of calling up the fire department. Unbelievable…totally unbelievable. My daughter’s gonna’ be in tears…as am I.
  
  America, I will miss your freedom. God, forgive us for ruining one of the best ideas for man kind. Freedom for God and not “freedom” granted by government. SE, please realize the American Idea is we are all equally free to fail, think, thrive or be what we want. However, we are not free when we are forced to believe those “ideals”.
  
  Report this comment
- CobraBill
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:34pm
  She is on msnbc, who care what she does?
  
  Report this comment
- richauthor
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:38pm
  To me, I think if we Conservatives have a number of gays, that number is extremely small. It’s as though we are giving special dispensation to, say, left-handed people. If you are left-handed or if you are gay, then just shut up and keep it to yourself. I don’t care what anyone does with their personal lives, but for goodness sakes, stop rubbing it in my face and stop demanding that everyone else takes care not to hurt your feelings. Get over it. You chose your lifestyle, but I did not.
  
  Report this comment
- cityfan23
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:38pm
  SE is the female Joe Scarborow. She reminds me of the college kid that thinks they are outsmarting everyone in the room.
  
  Report this comment
- civilwarcometh
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:38pm
  Gay rights movement was created by the Marxist to morally change this country. I see a lot of people have fell for this crap. Even the progressive S.E. Cup….
  
  Report this comment
- Locked
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:41pm
  @Cessna
  
  “Freedom for God and not “freedom” granted by government. SE, please realize the American Idea is we are all equally free to fail, think, thrive or be what we want.”
  
  SE Cupp is an atheist, so I doubt she’ll agree about “Freedom for God,” though likely with the much more conservative idea of “freedom to believe in whatever higher power you want.”
  
  While I agree with the idea that conservatives need to stop legislating morality and focus on fiscal issues, I don’t think her boycotting CPAC is going to change anyone’s mind.
  
  Report this comment
- m224224
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:41pm
  For those of you quoting this “pick my pocket” quote from the non-Christian Jefferson. Did homosexuality pick the pocket of Lot and his family in Sodom and Gommorah? Gee maybe everything the founding fathers said wasn’t right. Its time to get back to Jesus and then the early Church Fathers.
  
  Report this comment
- The_Almighty_Creestof
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:48pm
  Sorry, but my gut reaction has always been that gays are no different than pedophiles and those who practice beastiality…they have unnatural sexual urges they either can’t or won’t restrain themselves against.
  
  Report this comment
- PaulHR
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:55pm
  Where have all the godly people gone? You can not pick which part of the bible you want to believe. This is nothing more the giving in to the liberal left.
  
  Report this comment
- 70S_KIDS_FIGHTING_SOCIALISM
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:55pm
  Yea like the gays haven’t been purposely corrupting infiltrating the Church. They hate Jesus and his Church with a CRUEL HATRED!!!!!!!!!!! They will NEVER stop persecuting the body of Christ. They will demand Gay marriages in every Church. etc… They will never stop unless they become true Christians that are possessors of saving grace and start loving Christ. It is a war and they are doing Satans bidding. The word of God that double edge SWORD torments them!!!!!!
  
  Report this comment
- SacredHonor1776
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:56pm
  Actually if homosexuals use the government funded health care to treat diseases they obtained through their sexual actions, it does pick the pocket of everyone else.
  
  Much in the same way heterosexuals who abuse the government funded healthcare to treat diseases they had through their escapades.
  
  I don’t think you even understood the context of Jefferon’s comment.
  
  BTW, Jefferson was his own form of Christian, he was not an athiest, and not necessarily traditional deist either.
  
  http://www.monticello.org/site/blog-and-community/posts/top-10-misconceptions-about-jefferson
  
  “Thomas Jefferson was an atheist/Deist/not a Christian. As far as I know there is no good argument for calling Jefferson an atheist. I’ve heard some good arguments for calling him a Deist, and although he seems never to have explicitly called himself a Deist, he did hold some Deisty sort of beliefs. The Christian/not-Christian thing is tricky; Jefferson’s non-belief in the divinity of Jesus disqualifies him according to many folks’ definition of Christianity. On the other hand, TJ seemed to consider himself a Christian, in the sense that he was a follower of Jesus. So let’s just say, this is complicated, and quite often folks get tripped up with this because they oversimplify.”
  
  Report this comment
- SocialistSlayer
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:57pm
  I told you she was a Communist – Now we know she’s Gay ( A Sodomite) as well!
  
  Report this comment
- Hermit_boy
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:58pm
  In response to all those people asking how letting gay people marry affects others, its not about letting them get married. It is about making us recognize their marriage. Once gay marriage is legalized, we will be required to recognize it. And its already starting.
  
  - In 2010, Jennifer Keeton who was expelled from Augusta State University for her views against homosexuality.
  
  - Last April, a Kansas State bill was proposed that would include a requirement that churches that rent out for weddings would also have to rent to gay couples. (was not passed)
  
  - Kate Baker and Ming Linsley successfully sued (settled out of court) a Vermont Inn that would not rent to them for their wedding.
  
  -NJ State Goverment ruled that the privately owned Ocean Grove pavilion had to rent to gay couples wanting to be married there
  
  -Catholic adoption centers in Illinois and Massachusetts have closed after being told they must go against their beliefs and provide adoption services to gay couples.
  
  - KSL, a broadcasting station in Utah refused to air a program called The New Normal about a woman being a surrogate for a gay couples baby. They were attacked for refusing to air the show.
  
  Should I go on? This is not about gay couples marrying and quietly living out their lives. This is about forcing people who are against homosexuality to accept it against their convictions.
  
  Report this comment
- NukeHaze
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:00pm
  S. E. i s showing so.e progressivism an using liberal boycott tactics to force her beliefs about 3% of the population on a group who would wisely get government out of marriage altogether, not debate morality and consequences of gay couples being screened for adoption of kids governed by the federal and state governments, the fact that their unions can be seen instead as the homosexual equivalent of heterosexual marriage already and that the only other benefit that might differ from heterosexuals is taxes as a couple. Fine you can give homosexual unions a “married” tax filing but YOU WILL NEVER FORCE MY PASTOR OR BISHOP TO MARRY HOMOSEXUALS because the alternative stylers demand it if they are licensed to marry at all. I guarantee we will see threat of revoking those powers granted to holy leaders to perform marriages if they say it is against their belief to marry them. You have been in the big city and near broadcasting to believe the demographics of our nation represents your peer group. You usually talk a good game but all I see now is a progressive rino willing to sell out the majority to appease the minority for a measley 3%.
  
  Why aren’t you then proselyting for plural marriage instead since it was practiced biblically and is more natural for children than homosexual parents?
  
  I used to be somewhat impressed “Essie”… not anymore. I will never feel the urge to see you on thee due to your decay from moral issues.
  
  Goodbye.
  
  Report this comment
- Stuck_in_CA
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:01pm
  I figured something was up with SE, the way she put down Rand Paul after his TeaParty response. He was great. She thought he stunk.
  
  Report this comment
- richard the lion-hearted
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:03pm
  S.E. [Serious Error] Cupp. So maybe now Glenn might be more careful who he aligns himself with, I know the Lord wants us to be loving in every approach but not to the point of embracing outspoken individuals who support, preach, or teach that which goes against God. That IS by definition a ANTICHRIST, to teach contrary to the Lord, a little truth…alot, with lies that create a great stumbling block. I think Glenn is getting a bit starstruck and loving his wealth more and more,. point in case are the ads from time to time on this site that support the very things or topics Glenn speaks against. Love of money under the guise of we need more money for the cause…slippery slope. You can barely navigate this site without complete lock-ups or freeze ups from all the adware.
  
  Report this comment
- TRUTHandFREEDOM
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:39pm
  Nature’s Law & Nature’s God made a naturally obvious reproductive unit (man & woman) to go forth & multiply. That union has purpose & assignment. The mechanical structure of the mother is designed for a specific role in that union. THAT union is known as marriage & at the core of our population structure & a natural government on its own.
  
  Same sex unions cannot be what the man/woman unit are. It is something different & should be named differently. . Its “organizers”/activists are trying to discredit Biblical adherants & influence upon public virtue, which I see as a threat to freedom. That’s it.
  
  That is what I see.
  
  A tool of the communist.
  
  Some may be advocating gay “marriage” without connecting those dots, but I have no doubt that THOSE ARE THE DOTS & part of the package that includes the lawsuits against religious activity on public land, against religious objects in schools & courthouses & the revision of Thomas Jefferson’s Separation of Church & State phrase. I welcome the voice of all conservatives, but I think that the truths that I have posted are self evident.
  
  Did SE announce her sexual preference? I don’t care. I appreciate her voice & attitude. The conservative wing of America follows Biblical principles that influenced our law & societal structure. They still matter, even if they are simply called Freedom’s principles by Conservatives without faith. The source will not be disconnected from Conservatism.
  
  Report this comment
- LeftOfRightOfLeft
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:41pm
  @AVENGERK:
  
  The link you gave can’t be trusted as a source for any real data. Half of the citation links are 404′d. The research it uses is is over a decade old(except one article from 2005) and the majority of the research is from over two decades ago or greater. Please link your CDC statistics I would love to see them, also googling for “Center for disease control” won’t give me the same data your basing your opinions off of so please provide source.
  
  Report this comment
- JRook
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:42pm
  Not sure what the loss is? She rarely presents either an intelligent argument for or against anything and is obviously taking a stance to get attention. Perhaps like Ann Coulter she has a book coming out.
  
  Report this comment
- Oldmantex
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 6:26pm
  Good, it is about time they start weeding these liberal republicans out of CPAC. Does SE really think anyone cares that she wont be at CPAC? Maybe she and Chris Christy can go discuss Obamacare over some cheese burgers and shakes, while the conservatives get back to business.
  
  Report this comment
- Ballot_Box_Revolution
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 6:29pm
  cessna how many times did you mention freedom in that comment? All that speaking of freedom, and yet defending the barring of gay conservatives from cpac. No one is calling for a special right here, it is as simple as….well…..freedom.
  
  No I’m not a gay rights advocate, or for any special rights for any group for that matter. I’m not even a fan of the gay lifestyle, but they have a right to be who they are as long as they are not harming anyone or trampling on other peoples freedom.
  
  No i’m not for gay marriage either. Marriage is between God and the people getting married, and gov should not be involved at all.
  
  Report this comment
- VaARNG_Guardsman
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 6:35pm
  That’s cool, conservatives who believe in traditional marriage and morals, can pull out of the Republican Party. SE Cupp, is a liberal-nazis.
  
  Report this comment
- Bluebonnet
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 6:38pm
  I like SE Cupp, but I say let her stay away from CPAC if she tries to make an issue of this. I’m NOT against gay rights if that’s how they roll, but I AM AGAINST gay marriage. That’s going too far.
  
  Report this comment
- dugirl232
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 6:40pm
  what is the deal with SE? She’s acting like a liberal. Liberals think we all must suffer if they don’t like something. Conservatives just choose other options. Threaten SE! As soon as you got on the gay bandwagon you lost my respect. It’s not due to the gay issue. Its due to being one thing in front of a crowd and another when we turn our back.
  
  Report this comment
- lillymckim
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 6:44pm
  Buh Bye! No more publicity for you!
  
  Report this comment
- TRUTHandFREEDOM
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 6:52pm
  To the “it doesn’t pick my pocket or break my leg” commenters, read my post above and tell me how the loss of freedom, the fundamental transformation of the United States of America & the over regulation, mandates and tax increases that are part of that will not pick your pocket or break your leg.
  
  To destroy the influence of Biblical principles upon our society is to pave the way for socialism and communism. We will not be a 51/49% voting country if those principles are gone. We will be more 65/35 or worse in favor of just letting the government do what the rhetoric says.
  
  The agenda before us is to chip away at the tenets of the Bible. To discredit it. To point it out as wrong on whatever they can progressively sell a case for and then say, well it was wrong on this and it’s wrong on everything. This is about faith and freedom at the same time. Marx, Hitler, Stalin and on; replaced religion in the classroom with government in the classroom. Marx specifically called for the removal of religion. Hitler & Stalin removed it by force; by government mandate.
  American progressives remove it by lawsuits and counter culture advancement.
  
  Report this comment
- Ballot_Box_Revolution
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 6:55pm
  You know where the proof is that God was a fan of free will??
  
  He put the flippin tree INSIDE the garden!!!!
  
  Forcing people to do good is not the actual will of the individual and not the same….It is just as STUPID as political correctness.
  
  The hate filled “Bible Thumpers” (never thought I would use that term, but wow seriously reading this site lately brings the term I used to hate into a new light) who love to judge and try to fear people with fire and brimstone are almost just as bad as the radical Muslims.
  
  I’m not saying that being gay is not a sin, but who am I to decide the fate of people? And who are you to decide?
  
  Sodom and Gomorrah was a judgement on society, and many of you probably fear that, but your actions are not very welcoming and you drive people AWAY from God encouraging a Sodom and Gomorrah type society.
- MyBestEffort1011
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 7:00pm
  To those who think that gay marriage Will not affect their lives: Think about this.
  Gay marriage “renders meaningless the man-woman distinction, the most important distinction regarding human beings’ personal identity. Nothing would accomplish this as much as same-sex marriage.” Dennis Prager
  1. Gender becomes insignificant. Happening now before the law is passed.
  A. Girls prom kings, boys prom queens
  B. No more father daughter dances……exactly
  C. Religious charities placing children with man-women couples only….racist. Catholic charitiy adoption agencies in some states have closed their doors.
  2. Must Read article byhttp://www.americanthinker.com/2013/01/the_oncoming_human_rights_crisiscaused_by_the_lgbt_movement.html#.US1Hp_YrSaU.email
  3. By giving into our good intentions of not depriving gays the right to marry, we are forgetting that we are being unfair to children by saying to a child “you will never have a mother (woman) or you will never have a father (man)”. I find that to be cruel.
  4. In elementary school, “little Tommy do you want to be a boy or girl? Or do you want to marry a boy or girl?”
  gender confusion and the loss of motherhood and fatherhood as values, is a bad thing. And BTW. as Dennis Prager points out “To argue that opposition to same-sex marriage is immoral is to argue that every moral thinker, and every religion and social movement in the history of mankind prior to the last 20 years in America and Eu
  
  Report this comment
- TEOTWASWKI
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 7:06pm
  Bye Bye SE don’t let the door hit you in the A$$ on your way out.
- MCGIRV
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 7:12pm
  S E has gone to the Dark Side!
- Vision Harry
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 7:15pm
  Don’t let the door hit ya on the way out
- PilgrimStuckInBizarroWorld
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 7:25pm
  I am personally glad she is out and I am also so tired of this agenda being pushed from everywhere. I think it should all be put back in the closet and not discussed any longer. Is there no respect left for yourself that your private behavior is out for all to see. This nation has fallen so far from the “Shining City on the Hill” that it makes me ashamed of my country. I really don’t care how adults behave in private and that is should be kept private!
  
  Report this comment
- techengineer11
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 7:46pm
  bye bye. good riddance.
  
  Report this comment
- Patrick Henry II
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 7:48pm
  S.E. Talking about the 2%ers.
  First off it is an abhorant behavior. Second if they did not flaunt it it would NOT be an issue. It’s your fault it’s an issue.
  I don’t think you want to hear about my sexual fettishes, do you? STFU then.
  
  Report this comment
- RIDEMODELS
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 7:52pm
  Gay men are only Gay until they score a hot chick…….Women know this and this is why they hang with them(attention), but they are not Moral and God knows this….SE hated the liberals(Hustler) when they made porn pics of her and she ran to Glenn for help…..But now the immoral lifestyle is cool……Well there is a Bible and there is a reason we follow it.
  
  Gay men only act Gay so they can score a hot chick….The End.
  
  Let the Meteors commence…..
  
  Report this comment
- RIDEMODELS
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 8:11pm
  How about we replace SE with Stacy Dash…….Sounds like a plan to me……Stacy seems like more of a conservative than SE anyway….Vote??
  
  Report this comment
- mrunner
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 8:28pm
  Why the hell is the federal government involved in marriage anyhow?? I call BS. Their job is to keep this country safe and protect our constitutional rights and freedoms. I could give a rip if you want to marry someone of the same sex- find someone to officiate it and get it done- but leave all this marriage stuff out of politics.
  
  Report this comment
- kenboo1
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 8:35pm
  S.E. Cupp Pulls Out of CPAC Until Groups Representing Gay Republicans Are Embraced
  
  So is SE asking me to give them a hug??? I don’t want to hug a gay person, Well, Actually, I am a closet lesbian… I wouldn’t mind hugging a lesbian… I wouldn’t mind hugging SE ( I am now wondering; is she or is she not??? Hmmmmm…) I am trapped in this male body and I oh so truly want to be a lesbian…
  
  Report this comment
- Brooke Lorren
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 10:28pm
  Not too sad about this…
  
  As a left-hander, there are several differences between us and gay people:
  1) there are probably more of us than there are gay people
  2) we are not, by definition, doing something that God commanded us not to do. There are good left-handers and bad ones, but our morality does not come from our handedness.
  3) we don’t DEMAND accommodations. Yes, many companies realize that we’re 12% of the population and create things, like scissors and computer mice, that can be used by people no matter what is their dominant hand; it only makes sense because we can go shop somewhere else. As far as I know, there aren’t any court cases where a left-handed person sued someone because a company wouldn’t bend over backwards to accommodate them. As an example, although there are some mice with special features made for right-handers, I don’t get all up in arms over it. I just don’t buy the product. Sometimes I will write a company with suggestions on how to make their products work for anybody, but I’m not trying to sue them over it.
  
  Report this comment
- Seawolf607
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 10:37pm
  I am tired of liberal or progresive ideas infecting conservative events. S.E. If you want to go promote homosexuality then go join the Democrats. And good riddance CPAC is better off without you.
  
  Report this comment
- lovenfl3
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 10:44pm
  Can even one single day go buy where there isn’t a discussion about gay marriage? We have so many other issues to deal with today. Let’s fix the economic issues, then we can discuss social issues. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgozUvvCqAw
  
  Report this comment
- encinom
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 11:21pm
  These hate filled posts only demostrate that Chrisitians can’t be considered defenders of the Constitution. Instead of defending the rights of others, the Christians are seeking to impose their beliefs on the country. The extreme right wing fringe is destroying the GOP brand, its litmus and purity tests are narrowing the base driving Americans to abandon the Tea Pary controlled GOP. Your god does not write US law, your bible is not a law book. Its clear that Beck’s audience are not libertarians, but radicals looking to impose a theocracy on the nation.
  
  Report this comment
- Sparky77
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 11:42pm
  Wow, this is disappointing. I have to agree with cessna152. Really SE? This is your big issue?
  
  Report this comment
- Obama_In_PeePee_By_Zee_ArTeest_Glenn
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 1:36am
  “S.E. Cupp Pulls Out of CPAC Until Groups Representing Gay Republicans Are Embraced”
  
  S.E. now officially stands for “Seriously” “Eeeew”!
  Does she? Or doesn’t she? Either way, Seriously Eeeew …
  
  18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, …
  20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, …
  24 Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, …
  26 For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature.
  27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.
  28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; …
  32 who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same BUT ALSO APPROVE OF THOSE WHO PRACTICE THEM.
  [Romans 1, Holy Bible]
  
  Report this comment
- katzkiner
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 2:36am
  When I was in highschool and college, revolution and communism were all the rage. I went to civil rights marches, antiwar marches, love fests, sit ins and millions of concerts, it was cool. Later we began to find out how many millions of people died in the the revolution and we fell out of love with the movement. 20 to 60 million in China, 2 to 6 million in Cambodia, 2 to 3 million in Cuba on and on. Did you ever listen to the words of John Lennons “Revolution”. You should, he was a communist leader who woke up to the evils of socialism. The people leading you now are anachronisms of the 60s and 70s. They are selling you their “revolution”. It has always led to poverty and lots of bloodshed.
  Find some new leaders who are NOT communists while you can. These radicals leading you were detonating nail bombs when I was in college. They’re old extremists now, they will use bigger bombs. You could be stuck with their rule for life. Look at North Korea.
  
  Report this comment
- Bottomgun
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 3:05am
  S.E., your message would have been more effective when spewed upon the RINOs using their own microphones at CPAC rather than this method you chose. No matter, people are choosing not to listen to RINOS or so-called conservatives supporting the government forcing the term “marriage” as other that that what happens between a “one man and one woman.”
  
  Report this comment
- ArchaicSEAL
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 4:26am
  Live and let live. Look, I don’t care who you are (or think you are,) you are not going to change a gay person. Period. They have made their choice. And that choice is between them and God. Sin is a personal issue, not a collective one. We are not called to eradicate sin in the world, Jesus did that. When mankind tries to do it you end up with the Catholic inquisitions and horrible human suffering. Let each man deal with their own sin personally with God. If that means the end of this country, well, I am not going to put the blame solely on homosexuality.
  
  We have committed and continue to commit so many more sins as a nation beyond homosexuality. Pornography is a major one. And I don’t mean just in porn flicks. Greed and corruption are another. Materialism is probably the biggest. In the end, this nation has SO much moral fixing to do that to just sit here and believe that homosexuality is the only problem is outright ridiculous. Honestly, I don’t believe America will ever return to God as a nation of individuals, we are too far gone for that. Moreover, we all know what happens at the end of this road.
  
  Report this comment
- dukielouie
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 6:42am
  Ms.Cupp have you read Russell Kirk or Bill Buckley on conservatism? Please do not tell the people that CPAC is a conservative action committee.It is a RINO festival. You have a problem with the republican party. Go ask you freinds like Jeb Bush,Chris Christie,Marco Rubio(Bush Boy), and others why they won’t stand with your gay group. We real conservatives could care less!
  
  Report this comment
- TennesseeScott
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 9:40am
  Iam sorry that she feels that way, Iam a Libertarian and I live Libertarian. I feel that peple have just as much of a right to not accept the Gay life style as those who accept it. Why Boycott an event, you should speak! UP!
  Go to CSPAC and speak your mind , I admire people who say something live and in front of one’s face,
  
  Report this comment
- jram2506
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 10:10am
  exactly what I was thinking. Being a conservative IS NOT being a republican. As for gay marriage, I feel it is NOT a conservative value. Period. Not to be discriminatory, just fact. I believe that we should have equal rights but not same definitions. Call it partnership or whatever, just not marriage. But the gay agenda is NOT about that at all. I feel CPAC needs to keep its message of conservatism alive and not worry about selling itself around winning elections with groups of small agendas. Already been done. ie…Republicans and Democrats.
  
  Report this comment
- lobster
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 10:26am
  Oh, toro poopoo. The census says that there are 3% of adults that are “gay”. Subtract the group under 16 and the group over 64 and you end up with 2%. That’s it folks. Talk about the tail wagging the dog…
  
  Report this comment
- JohnofOregon
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 10:33am
  @sil in cny,
  
  Absolutely correct.
  
  Republican=party
  Conservative is a movement so was fundamental Christians . The party leaders for two presidential cycles have told the Christians to stay home and now they do not want the conservatives who also happen to get along with libertarians.
  The democrats are now run by the socialists, Marxists and communists.
  It is idealogy like culp’s that destroys the republican base. When Christians were told they were no longer welcome in the Republican Party and that the gay movement would run both here in oregon, the republicans lost the house, the senate and a us senate seat. The base voters voted the ballot but under voted key races.
  The question for faux conservatives like culp is, why should Christian’s, conservatives and libertarian leaning republicans be forced to vote for chosen party candidates that work against them.?
  
  The establishment republicans do a pretty good job for Obama leftist.
  
  Report this comment
- georgette
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 11:09am
  I am so bone weary of jots and tittles I could spit…..by the time they include and resolve evurrrrrrrrry issue some person wants to raise……you will have defeated your purposes– by your own hands…
  
  ….is there no end to creating victims? this country is circling the drain…and .what are they doing? building drains…!
  
  Report this comment
- AJBrad
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 11:11am
  good riddance
  
  Report this comment
- Dismayed Veteran
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 12:11pm
  While the Republican Party may, in the future, marginalize morality for the sake of inclusionj, I am in tend to marginalize the Republican Party rather than morality. Ultimately, I choose to marginalize man instead of God.
  
  I am no fundamentalist Christian. I am a Roman Catholic. I am often at odds with the fundamentalist Protestants but one area I hope we agree upon is that Jesus Christ is our Savior not the Republican Party.
  
  Report this comment
- theBru
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 12:16pm
  Thank You ARCHAICSEAL…How about a GREAT BIG SHOUT OUT for the seal man…I don’t care if they get married, or divorced, I just want to know who is the husband and who is the wife…I have never gotten an answer to that one question…
  Also, I hope they get to get married, then they will all know what we heterosexual folks go thru…The one thing I learned in marriage, it is one mistake you just learn to live with…
  
  Report this comment
- Chatikh
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 1:31pm
  @SACREDHONOR1776
  
  “Much in the same way heterosexuals who abuse the government funded healthcare to treat diseases they had through their escapades.”
  
  Here’s two scenarios. First is a poor girl in a rough neighborhood. She is currently on medicaid. Her doctor prescribes her birth control because she is being pressured by her boyfriend to become sexually active. Since she’s on medicaid, the government is paying for her birth control. This birth control is however a good investment for the government. Since she was easily prevented from having a child before graduating high school, she is now much more likely to make more from her job once she is an adult, either by going to college or being able to work more hours. That means more taxable income. The same applies to the father.
  
  The second scenario is the same girl, now an adult. She never got pregnant, except she got HPV from her boyfriend. As happens much too often, she never got regular pap smears. She went to the doctor for irregular bleeding and pain in her pelvis. She later finds out that the cause is cervical cancer. Now, Christian morals might have taught you that this was a cause of her sexual sins, so she somewhat deserves it, but the medical field isn’t so callous. When it comes to treatment, it doesn’t matter how she got sick, all that matters is that she is sick. It does matter when it comes to prevention, which is why we now have vaccines for HPV, which I remember the Right was against.
  
  Report this comment
- GLOCKU
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 3:28pm
  She is Godless, nuff said.
  
  Report this comment
- The_Jerk
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 6:09pm
  S.E. Cupp is a closet lesbian liberal.
  
  Report this comment
- thejcpro
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 8:44pm
  I agree. Conservatism is being snubbed out of America by the its supposed friend – the REPUBICANS, as Mark Levin calls them. America has become the modern day Sodom and Gomorrah. SE Cupp is another example of one who believes that Gay Marriage will somehow appease their consciences. She’s wrong. Beck is wrong, too. Sin is sin. Yahweh has not accepted sin – EVER. He forgives us of our sins, but will never CONDONE it. America is reaping what it has sown and is sowing. Look around you… notice the push on all fronts for the gay agenda. Even this site publishes a friendly story on a gay and transgender “Christian” band. HOW SICKENING! From Obama to Glenn Beck (who I happen to agree with most of the time), supporters of gay this and gay that. I have a close family member who is gay whom I love very much, but I would never agree to gay marriage or any such abomination before the Living God. And by the way, when He speaks we all will hear.
  
  Report this comment
- ERP
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 11:30pm
  Notice everyone how she made this announcement during her appearance on MSNBC instead of her Blaze TV program?
  
  Also, let’s not forget that SE is a self proclaimed atheist. Not to say that I’m perfect and have done nothing wrong in my own lift but I have to ask…where does she get her morals from?
  
  I hope Glenn is shaking his head and reviewing his decision to bring her under his employment. She has every right to have her opinion but I also have the right to disagree and not support her.
  
  Glenn has been asking all of us to call and ask that the Blaze TV be picked up by our local TV providers. Maybe in return, he shall relieve her of her duties.
  
  Report this comment
- ERP
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 11:34pm
  @encinom
  
  Hey, noticed that every post after yours pretty much ignored the statement you made? Maybe you’ll finally realize that most people here really don’t care for your OPINION.
  
  Sorry to say, but you’re pretty much irrelevant.
  
  Thanks for playing…
  
  Report this comment
- scarydave
  Posted on February 28, 2013 at 12:16am
  S.E., don’t let the door hit you on the way out!
  How stupid. Has anyone told her that this is NOT a GOP event?!
  
  Report this comment
- scarydave
  Posted on February 28, 2013 at 12:20am
  ERP
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 11:34pm
  @encinom
  Hey, noticed that every post after yours pretty much ignored the statement you made? Maybe you’ll finally realize that most people here really don’t care for your OPINION.
  Sorry to say, but you’re pretty much irrelevant. Thanks for playing…
  ————————————————————————————————-
  Irrelevant is right on target. Then writing anything here on this forum is akin to someone taking a pack of matches to Hell…. POINTLESS!
  
  Report this comment
- WakingSheep
  Posted on February 28, 2013 at 2:01am
  Tried to warn you about her GOP… and Romney as well!!!
  
  Report this comment
- milez5
  Posted on February 28, 2013 at 2:50am
  S.E. Cupp is one of the new brand of young Republican that believes that the Republican party should adopt leftist Democratic positions on all social issues. The Republican party is finished.
  The coalition that reelected Obama will elect every president from now on.
  If we are to prevent this nation from becoming a third world cesspool we are going to have to come up with a better idea than the Republican party. whatever that idea is, S.E Cupp and her ilk should have no influence on it.
  
  Report this comment
- go2Doc
  Posted on February 28, 2013 at 3:50am
  Like all those who are unprincipled, she must have lesbianic tendencies. What else can one conclude? Really, SE? Is it truly that hard?
  
  Report this comment
- siguy62
  Posted on February 28, 2013 at 8:52am
  She should be doing what she thinks is right. It is social conservatism that is being used as a club against the rest of us. I’m watching my freedoms being striped away by the one two punch of Progressives being enabled by purists on social issues. In the last election, the progressives played the social conservative right like a violin.
  
  Catholics failed to grasp the fact that Hispanic catholics voted overwhelmingly for Obama because of more than a generation of Communist infiltration into the church in South and Central America. These folks may or may not be be social conservatives, ( theoretically making them a natural conservative constituency) but those who are, live these tenets in their own lives and ignore what happens to the society at large. If you believe in personal accountability to God, then this isn’t too hard a concept to grasp.
  
  Many ‘Christians” were taken in by Obama’s team, and bemoaned Romney’s lack of Chistianity. So in the interest of pureness, we lost our opportunity to have the man with a much higher level of character to lead us, and we continue the slide.
  
  My question for CPAC. Why are you chasing me away. I’m relatively libertarian, and would call myself conservative on most issues. We disagree on certain issues, so you don’t want me. The left in this country wants progressive purity, and this disgusts me. Why can’t social conservative stand with me AGAINST the progressives? We share a lot more than we disagree on.
  
  Report this comment
- lillymckim
  Posted on February 28, 2013 at 5:02pm
  She’s not either one and I for one don’t want to hear anything she has to say.
  
  Report this comment
lincolnhenry1860
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:57pm
I agree S.E. Cupp! Like I stated in a different posting: Same sex marriage does not pick my pocket nor break my leg. Live and let live. Conservatives need to wake the hell up and see that Constitutionalists and or Libertarians are gaining in numbers and hopefully soon take over the GOP. The freakin’ DEMS are way far gone on the pinko commie ideology but they stay in power only because they are perceived to allow more social freedoms, when in fact they restrict almost everything. Taking over the GOP by people who just want to be free is the only hope we have.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- dstrider
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:08pm
  I am a Consitutionalist and a believer in Liberty, however we have to have a moral compass to guide us. Homosexuality is wrong, same as stealing or lying or any other sin. Granting gays the right to marry is promoting that sin. It may not break my leg but it does pick my pocket when my tax dollars will go to give them a marriage deduction or I have to pay for them to have the same benefits as traditional couples. If they want ti be together that is their business, just don’t make me support or promote it . Thanks for your opinion and a chance to respond.
  
  Report this comment
- GhostOfJefferson
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:12pm
  Your moral compass is YOUR moral compass. As long as nobody is harming you, preach away against gays all you wish, but you do not get to set the moral compass for the rest of the nation, assuming that they’re being peaceful and everything is consensual. What part of “live and let live” eludes you anyway? It’s not “live as I live, or else”.
  
  Report this comment
- Witness1974
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:16pm
  To hear all this demand for inclusion of homosexuals, one would think they are the biggest voting block in the country. Lincolnhenry1860, homosexual practice may not have broken your leg but if you pay taxes or health insurance premiums it has picked your pocket.
  
  Report this comment
- tolerence
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:19pm
  only 2% of Homosexuals live until 60,they have a 98% chance of seperation,because IT”S ALL ABOUT THE SEX! they dont stay together because about 99% of them ave multiple sex partners,Americans have lost their parental rights and this Homosexual crap is being taught to my son a captive audiense in the classroom,we lost our right to vote,in California when prop 8 went through,one Homosexual judge through out 8 million California voter who voted to support prop 8,so the Citizens lost their right to vote.Gays target christian owned buisnesses and sued them out of buisness,gays have a 60% chance of domestic violence compared to only 7% compared to heterosexual marriage,andthe gays shut down a 100 year old Catholic adoption agencey that had a 5 star rating for over a century,gays sued this adoption agency into shutting down,just because the adoption agency would ot let them adopt a baby even though there are adoption agencies that will let gays adopt,but the gays will eventuall shut down and sue all Catholic establishment,Catholic schools,they will soon sue Catholic Churchs for not letting gays get married in the Church violating Art one of the bill of rights,…so these idiots who say live and let live tell that to the gay activist,they are the ones assualting people and stripping me of my right to worship,the right to vote,and my parentel rights by not letting my socials viewpoints to be taught in our schools which have been turned into a liberal recruitment camps…gays are hat
  
  Report this comment
- Exrepublisheep
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:29pm
  TOLERENCE. Proof for your numbers?
  
  Report this comment
- Cavallo
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:29pm
  @Tolerance, Don’t let the State educate your child. They’re indoctrination centers staffed by subpar employees.
  
  Report this comment
- AvengerK
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:34pm
  JEFFERSON….tell me why Gay Inc will not retain it’s hyper-litigious nature after federal ratification of homosexual marriage?
  Tell me why they will stop behaving as they do today whereby if an enterprise, individual or organization does not participate in their fantasies, they attempt to either shame it into submission or oblivion or litigate it into submission or oblivion?
  
  They will use “discrimination” to force all resistance to their abberrant lifestyle to comply or disolve. This is not conjecture, they’re doing it right now as we speak.
  
  Case in point…the successful suit against eHarmony to force the website into including homosexuals against the owner’s wishes. There are plenty of websites catering to homosexuals both for “love” and for anonymous, no stings sex..yet eHarmony was targeted nonetheless. These JEFERSON are true freedoms being infringed upon by the left and Gay Inc not the imaginary ones of less than 2% of the population and it’s psychological disorder.
  By all means prove me wrong.
  
  Report this comment
- Verceofreason
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:40pm
  This is a civil rights issue.
  Period.
  As soon as one says Homosexuality is wrong
  they have brought their religious beliefs into the issue.
  
  Report this comment
- Listen_then_think
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:43pm
  BAD BAD MOVE! Forcing conservatives to accept liberal ideas is an oxy-moron. White is not black, evil is not good. For her to come out against conservative, God fearing values IS, reapeat :::IS::: forcing others to view things your way. That is NOT tolerant so don’t preach your tolerance and live and let live sack of lies to me. If you really were live and let live, she would not have announced it to make a point against conservatives. You are such hypocrites it is literally sickening.
  
  Report this comment
- Heffe44
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:46pm
  @tolerence
  Thanks so much for the fact based post about how terrible and dirty “the gays” are. I would love to read where you got all your numbers. Could you post a link to your research. I’m not trying to be lazy, I tried looking for where you got your facts but I couldn’t find it.
  
  Here’s a statistic that found while I was looking for your research… 40% of statistics are made up.
  
  Report this comment
- Chuck Anziulewicz
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:48pm
  DEAR DSTRIDER:
  
  Your write, “Homosexuality is wrong, same as stealing or lying or any other sin.”
  
  What kind of a value judgment is that? It makes no sense in terms of The Golden Rule. We don’t steal from other people because we don’t want other people stealing from us. We don’t lie to other people because we don’t want them lying to us. We don’t betray the trust of our spouses because we won’t want to be similarly betrayed.
  
  So why is it that Straight couples are encouraged to date, get engaged, marry and build lives together in the context of monogamy and commitment, and that this is a GOOD thing … yet for Gay couples to do exactly the same is somehow a BAD thing? To me this seems like a very poor value judgment.
  
  Report this comment
- Cavallo
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:49pm
  The gays want to use the police power (see shoot you dead if you say no) to force acceptance on others. Otherwise I have no problems with what they do in private, as long as I am not forced to associate with them. Freedom of association should include freedom to not associate.
  
  Report this comment
- AvengerK
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:54pm
  yeah ummm VERCYPERCY? Nice try to make this about “religious” reasons but it’s not is it champ?
  You see…there’s nothing normal or acceptable about 64% of new cases of HIV in this country each year being attributed to homosexuals who make up less than 2% of the population. Or the concerns for a drug resistant strain of gonorrhea being noticed among homosexual males. Or the high rates of depression and drug use among homosexuals. No..the bible didn’t give me these stats…the CDC did.
  
  You see here in southern california there’s lots of billoards and bus seat ads about “free HIV tests” “Free”? Really? They are just magically funded and provided and staffed? Can you tell me why homosexuals need “free” HIV tests champ?
  
  So by all means little lefty troll….tell me why I should tell your children and mine that its’ ok to be a homosexual in light of these truths? Its’ about the freedom to love anyone you want to love right idiot?
  
  Report this comment
- cydog
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:01pm
  Here is the problem, it does pick your pocket. Marriage is a contract that is regulated by the state. The state does not care if you “love” each other. The problem with the pro gay marriage crowd is they want the federal government to force this issue when it is clearly a state issue under contract law. How does it pick your pocket? Benefits. will the state require insurance to cover gay marriage? Will the state require businesses to provide these benefits? Military benefits? It is all coming. If it is purely about love, I’m sure their is some church out there that will “marry” gay couples, but it is not. This is all about benefits. Take the state out of providing benefits to married couples and see how hard they fight for gay marriage then. Heck if the state neither provides nor forces others to provide benefits to couples (gay or strait) go ahead, call yourself married for all I care, it’s your life. But, as long as my tax dollars support benefits and the state requires certain benefits from employers, it falls under contract law in which the state has every right to regulate marriage. Hence you can’t marry your sister, or under a certain age or whatever.
  
  Report this comment
- The Big Mick
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:03pm
  LINK and JEFF.
  Don’t give a sheite what ya’ll pervs do between your own sheets, lads.
  My line in the sand here is that as long as YOU will AFFIRM MY RIGHT to say “God says hoemoe be pervert” in the Public Square I’m cool. Long as the Prhomos ain’t trying to Silence me I don’t care.
  But the REAL agenda IS to Silence Me, isn’t it? It’s to use the Imprimatur and Power of THE STATE to SHUT UP anyone who DARES say “dat be PERV!”. Whole POINT to SS marriage.
  
  Report this comment
- AvengerK
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:16pm
  Here you go HEFFE..less than 30 seconds with Google.
  http://www.familyresearchinst.org/2009/02/medical-consequences-of-what-homosexuals-do/
  
  Please improve your keyword skills champ.
  
  Oh and my figures are from the CDC. Since you have trouble with Google I’ll dumb that down for you….CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL.
  
  You’re welcome champ.
  
  Report this comment
- carbonyes
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:21pm
  GhostofJefferson
  God set the moral impasse for the world when He created it, and even more dramatically when the framers petitioned God it the formative proceedings. The Framers not only believed in God’s divine intervention but believed the Bible as well. The tenants of the Bible are quite clear on the practice of homosexuality in both the Old and New Testaments. It is a egregious sin and violates everything that God stands for. It is a abomination. God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.
  Any nation that ever existed on the face of this earth declined and then became a remnant. The United States is rapidly progressing down that road, and the Imposter-in-Chief is promoting And exacerbating the downfall.
  Tell S.E. Cupp to peddle her papers elsewhere. MSNBC seems to be the perfect environment for her. Her priorities are not only mixed up but incompatible for a restoration of a free and prosperous America, minus the likes of Barack Hussein Obama and his ilk, who espouse neither American values nor the principles upon which this nation was founded.
  
  Report this comment
- timtritt
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:24pm
  Actually, to be consistent, the Govt. should have no say in ANY marriage. Unfortunately, due to the laws, in order to be protected should something happen to your partner, you need that sheet of paper.
  
  As for this not costing anyone, once it it is legalized, it does cost more in benefits (company AND governmental). Has anyone seen how much better the Federal, State, and Local benefits are when it comes to medical and dental plans? Now you have added legal spouses to medical plans.
  
  Live and let live, but don’t tell me it doesn’t “cost” anything, that is a lie.
  
  Report this comment
- Heffe44
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:34pm
  @AvengerK
  Wow… the Family Research Institute? Thirty more seconds of reading tells us that they are widely discredited and designated as a “Hate Group”.
  
  I haven’t read your CDC stats yet… but thanks for finding that for me.
  
  Report this comment
- dstrider
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 6:14pm
  Chuck,
  If everyone went gay how long does the human race exist? Probably a good reason you need a male and a female. Sounds pretty simple to me. As I said what you guys do together is your business, just don’t force me to support it thats all I’m saying. Thanks for your comment sir.
  
  Report this comment
- FloraBelleza
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 6:37pm
  Homosexuality had exist since the world had been create, and we the people always have been living together. Time past by and we the society have become more tolerant them never before, but that is not mean that they can come and forced us the Christians, to accept this. We learn to live them along and ignore what they are doing, because like JESUS said, the one that are not commit a sin to troll a first stone. So we learn to love them as a fathers, daughters, brothers, sisters, etc, etc. My daughter is gay, I love her very much, but I never going to accept do way she choose to live her life stile, sorry, but this is my opinion and she knows, do this make me love her less? Absolutely not, on the contrarily, I spend most of my time praying for her, them the others of my kids, but I cant’ betray my GOD, and my believes. My JESUS coming first, but S.E. is a atheist she cant’ understand, she lie when she said the Republicans should embraced gay married, but she left out to mention that are so many democrats and also libertarians that are against gay married, that the most of blacks do not support gays, and they are most democrats. About libertarians? I have to know many libertarians that don’t willy care about the life of others, but they are against gay married too because they are smart enough to know the agenda of liberals behind of all this. So please, S.E. SH.F.UP. You are not one of us, you do not speak for me or my valor’s.
  
  Report this comment
- RemoteCoderz
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 6:56pm
  @LincolnHenry Taking over the GOP by people who just want to be free is the only hope we have.
  
  When you are asking for special considering of and by others, you are no longer hoping we all live freely. You are forcing others to be accepting of your “condition”, whereby soliciting favoritism. That kills freedom and liberty of others.
  
  Plain and simple.
  
  You want to be gay, fine, you want to be a republican and get a gay agenda put on the platform, fine, but you shouldn’t expect conservatives, or libertarians to wave the rainbow flag. You are no longer conservative, nor libertarian, but progressive.
  
  And the GOP and the DEMs can keep their damn party. I want none of it.
  
  Report this comment
- Welcome Black Carter
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 7:11pm
  S.E is a sodimite AND an atheist…
  Sorry Ms Cupp I feel I can no longer let you be involved in my fantasies any longer. I have to let you go. I am so done with you.
  
  Report this comment
- Jadedfate
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 11:28pm
  I find it rather ironic when someone claims to be for liberty, and then says people shouldn’t be equal to others in the same sentence. Brainwashed religious zealotry.
  
  Report this comment
- SquidVetOhio
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 3:44pm
  “I find it rather ironic when someone claims to be for liberty, and then says people shouldn’t be equal to others in the same sentence. Brainwashed religious zealotry.”
  
  Well that’s because you’re ignorant. Sorry, you just are and here’s why. A gay man has THE EXACT SAME EQUAL rights and restrictions as a straight man. A straight man can marry a woman and that marriage is legally recognized. A gay man can marry a woman and it is legally recognized. A straight can not legally marry another man.
  
  You’re whole argument lies on “gays” being a different race which they are not or a different sex which they are not. They are a group of people whose SOLE distinction is what they are sexually attracted to. And since almost 70% of gays have admitted to having heterosexual relationships at least once, even that criteria is blown up. A man and never tried to be a woman once or a black man has never tried being a white man once. And what race does that make bisexuals or non-sexuals?
  
  You see, you have no logical or intellectual standing. You have the burden of proof that gays are somehow anatomically or religiously different than everyone else and you can’t. Case closed. Learn it, live it, love it.
  
  Brainwashed God-hating bigotry.
  
  Report this comment
- MAProg
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 8:47pm
  @Squid: the crux of the conservative argument is the strawman that homosexuality is just about sex. Homosexuality is not simply about sex, but about emotional relationships. A gay person dates people of the same gender because they are physically, and emotionally attracted to persons of the same gender. To reduce homosexual relationships down to simple sex is just as disingenuous as if saying that straight relationships are just about sex.
  
  This allows you guys to make bogus arguments that “gay people have the same rights because they can marry someone of the opposite gender, just like a straight person can.” The big difference is that heterosexuals are able to marry those whom they fall in love with, and can have an emotional relationship with while homosexuals aren’t. That’s not an equal right.
  
  Report this comment
trevthomp
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:55pm
Good for her. She said she wouldn’t be afraid to call out something or someone if she disagreed with them, and she’s following through with it. I could really care less what happens to/at CPAC anyway though. CPAC is really just another part of the GOP establishment.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Verceofreason
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:42pm
  @TOLERENCE.
  You haven’t a clue as to what you are talking about.
  You might want to stop displaying your ignorance.
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:48pm
  I think she is full of it. My gay dog Humpy has no one to speak for him, and SE just looks away, to bigger and better bandwagons. It’s bad enough Humpy lost his job and had to go on pet stamps, but now he has no voice in the media at all. All Humpy wants is for someone with a huge ego and some facial recognition to speak up for his rights to hump all the other gay dogs, as is his right. Is that too much to ask? Give Humpy a voice! Humpy the gay dog has no representation!
  
  Report this comment
- RIDEMODELS
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 8:40pm
  Lots and lots of drugs flowing though the Gay Clubs….Hope she does not get gang raped….I am sick and tired of trying to protect these Ignorant women…..Sick and Tired….!!!
  
  Report this comment
- Rajabear1
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 11:04am
  Just so you are clear who and where she really stands. I have no issue with disagreeing with certain view points of conservative mouthpieces, it’s what makes us individuals, but what she did a couple of weeks ago was straight out of the progressive playbook and was meant to be divisive. She ran straight to the NYT and promoted an Alinsky tactic (BTW, nice of you to cover it Blaze, truth has no agenda, eh?):
  “And we can’t be afraid to call out Rush Limbaugh,” said [Cupp]. “If we can get three Republicans on three different networks saying, ‘What Rush Limbaugh said is crazy and stupid and dangerous,’ maybe that’ll give other Republicans cover” to denounce the talk-show host as well.”
  Get it?
  
  Report this comment
wilbstal
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:55pm
God says no SE cup says yes. I choose Gods word. ill never watch Real News again , It is not real news its a gay site to enhace filth over the networks I refuse to be a part of it.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- walnutportconservative
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:00pm
  Is she employed by Beck?
  I was just thinking of getting DISH so I could get the Blaze… I will rethink this move.
  
  Report this comment
- kegbuna
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:16pm
  “It is not real news…”
  
  Hmm.. I don’t know where to go with this.. I need to get to my point but it’s little ways away.. let me get a running start and try to logically leap…
  
  “its a gay site to enhace [sic] filth over the networks”
  
  MADE IT
  
  Report this comment
- truthnstuff
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:13pm
  Most of the Blaze is OK. I usually wind up turning it off when E. Cupp starts expounding like she knows something. She’s just a liberal and should stay on MSLSD. The Real News would do well to just let her sit there as eye candy for some, but, she should not open her mouth. She can have all the stupid positions she wants, just don’t try pushing them on the rest of us. There is not one redeeming quality to “gay”.
  
  Report this comment
- oldandtired
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:14pm
  I agree
  
  Report this comment
- GOPROUD
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 6:45pm
  Well then i guess you better not get divorced if you are married. You better not ever talk to someone who has cheated on a spouse or gotten divorced. Its Gods words and what he says goes.
  
  Report this comment
- Heb4Seven
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 9:57pm
  S.E.’s an Athiest…so she does not know God…so therefore, she does not know the wisdom of God.
  
  Report this comment
- leonardo44
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 11:24pm
  S E Cupp is only one of the panelists on Real News, and definitely not the smartest one. It’s a good show, but I rely on panelists other then SE Cupp for meaningful content. I’m always glad when she has the day off from the show and someone else fills in for her. Honestly, I think she’s all about publicity, pandering and cementing her position at msnbc. And what’s with the “come hither” photo with this article? It’s really creepy. Does Cupp care about being taken seriously or is she more concerned with infusing inappropriate sexual undertones to advance her career ? Not cool.
  
  Report this comment
Ghandi was a Republican
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:55pm
In what way are Gay Republicans being un-included? What do you want? A Gay Republican Parade?
The whole point of Conservatism is to live and let live through the Constitution. I never heard of a Gay Republican or any other kind of Republican wanting to be “organized” into a separate community.
We are not “community organizers:. WE are already ORGANIZED AS AMERICANS!

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- S-O-B-E-R
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:14pm
  Well said! My problem with all this freakin’ feel good legislation is that it is only intended divide and conquer. You set up special classes of people, “green” initiatives, “common sense” this or that, the result is a total erosion of constitutional rights. I say something reasonable about my feelings about a subject, I am labled phobic or racist or a bully. Well, you know the drill. There are much bigger problems in our country than joining the us and them mentality.
  
  Report this comment
- RIDEMODELS
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 8:52pm
  My manager “Boss” is a gay man….He is the most worthless liberal turd I have ever delt with and a scatter brained manager……My work partner and friend was Gay and he was always accosting me at work(sexual harassment)…….I worked in a night club where Gay men were in and out because they loved all the ladies they would pick up……I will not hug one……I will not hang out with one outside of work…….and I will NEVER EVER protect one with my gun……Adios Gay pop…..Don’t come calling to me when the Liberal Date Rapes start UP in DA Clubs…..Adios.
  
  The surfer Kid on TMZ joked about Gay bars and them drugging his friend…..its a fun little game to them…..Good Luck SE.
  
  Keep track of your college children this summer.
  
  Report this comment
hauschild
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:55pm
“I’ve been scheduled to speak at CPAC this year, and I don’t think I can until this issue is reconciled and figured out.”

Told you people long ago this chick reeks of RINO. She’s cliche for these times. Staunchly conservative on many issues, but lacks the moral courage to go all in. Cupp is an example of what is WRONG with the conservative movement. You’re either a conservative, or you’re not.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Common Sense 24
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:57pm
  And she is NOT.
  
  Report this comment
- kadster01
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:01pm
  So, then, what if they decide to go with their conscience and oppose it. What then? I’d say I’m disappointed with Cupp, but I’m certainly not surprised.
  
  Report this comment
- brancal19
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:03pm
  I agree. She always seemed like a rino to me too. It’s funny that she’s writes a book about religion but doesn’t beleive in god. Another thing she’s know absolutely nothing about.
  
  Report this comment
- 00100111
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:04pm
  Republicans have moved so far to the left, being a RINO is not a bad thing anymore, as being a RINO puts you in the paleo-conservative/libertarian camp these days.
  
  Report this comment
- Rajabear1
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:40pm
  When she had her own temporary show on GBTV, she couldn’t contain her excitement over one of her most favorite politicians—Lindsey Graham. I knew right there and then who and what she is. She then went and proved me to be right, when she took the job on msnbc. For Beck to believe that somehow she is a bastion for conservatism on a dark lib world is a false belief. Not sure if anyone over there (from the Blaze) ever watches her or not, but I do (and yes, it does hurt to watch and pay attention to the LMS) and she is happy a a clam amongst them and feeds a very false narrative of conservatives.
  
  Report this comment
- Gonzo
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:51pm
  Hchild, truth be told, if she was homely none of us would have ever even heard of her. She adds nothing to the conversation.
  
  Report this comment
- hauschild
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:19pm
  I should add that I do enjoy most of her comments on Real News (Her incessant heavy breathing after each uttered statement, notwithstanding). I mean, these days we pretty much take what we can get, but I just don’t understand these types. Why do they cater to the bottom feeders when those issues are so freaking irrelevant in the grand scheme of things??? What is so difficult about taking a stand and calling out repulsive behavior???
  
  Report this comment
- AvengerK
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:22pm
  HAUSCHILD…Cupp is a product of the education system today. She’s young enough to be so. The liberal machine has made her succeptible to it’s ideas. She doesn’t consider the danger in telling kids that homosexuality is normal or acceptable in light of facts like 64% of new HIV cases each year are attributed to homosexuals who make up less than 2% of the population. Or the concerns for a drug resistant strain of gonorrhea among homosexual males. Or the higher incidences of depression and drug use and the higher mortality rates. Cupp has bought the “free to love anyone you want to love” gooey catch phrase of Gay Inc. Of course it sounds wonderful until you realise who’s doing that loving and what the consequences are. Oh and bring it right back to fiscal conservatism…who’s willing to pay for those medical bills for the whale sized cocktails of drugs HIV patients and full blown AIDS sufferers (along with other STDs) require? Obamacare?
  Cupp isn’t thinking with her head, she’s buying the heartstring pulling of the left.
  
  Report this comment
dstrider
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:54pm
I appreciate all points of view but SE is more and more MSNBC and less Blaze everytime she opens her mouth. I know Glenn wants all pionts of view but he could save a few bucks and fire her, it wouldn’t hurt my feelings at all.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- The-Real-Enrico
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:10pm
  Agreed.
  
  Report this comment
- kenr1963
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 6:33pm
  I agree By-By SE
  
  Report this comment
- Small World
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 8:35pm
  Ditto and amen !
  
  Report this comment
- lincolnhenry1860
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 10:03pm
  DSTRIDER:
  I have to admit, that yes, under our unconstitutional system we have in place now, same sex marriage would pick our pocket. However, straight marriage is picking our pocket – all of our pockets. I think you sound like a very reasonable person and I bet you and I agree on way more than we disagree- I stated that I am a Constitutionalists and if I follow that logic all the way out, I come to the conclusion that government should not be involved in any marriage. What do you say? I also appreciate your opinion.
  
  Report this comment
- dstrider
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 5:25pm
  Lincoln Henry
  I would agree that Govt should not be involved in marriage. Unfortunately it is involved so we have to deal with it in the best way possible. If we can get govt out of marriage that would be fine. I don’t want the govt ever to tell my church they have to recognize and perform gay marriages. That is a major concern to me. Govt out of the marriage business all together, you bet. Thank you for your viewpoint.
  
  Report this comment
lisalake
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:52pm
SE has been aserting herself as somewhat of an insider, expert. she really needs to STHU.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
walnutportconservative
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:52pm
Who cares? Why do I care if she speaks? SE??? Please define… what defines a person as being conservative? I will insist that the term consevative includes social conservativism. By that I suggest that social ills be addressed. Homosexuality is a social ill. It is perversion, and is not natural. God does not approve… NOT AT ALL!!! The homosexuals, and all the rest of the LBGT only makes up a small percentage of Americans. Ignore them and they will go back in the closet. Has America lost it’s moral direction forever?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- 00100111
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:07pm
  ” It is perversion, and is not natural. God does not approve… NOT AT ALL!!!”
  
  So don’t be homosexual. If someone else is, God will have a conversation with them later. How is it your business? If you don’t want to associate with them, that is your right. But it is not your right to force others to live their lives the way you think they should.
  
  Report this comment
- truthnstuff
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:26pm
  I would actually like to hear one positive thing about “gays”. They contribute nothing positive to the unit called family.
  
  Report this comment
- pmjme
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 8:43pm
  @001 so how is it their right to force others to have to legally accept their behavior as normal? How is it their right to silence anyone who disagrees by labeling them bigots, hate groups and all the rest? There is absolutely zero respect from the gay community for a difference of opinion on their lifestyle. They just sue, sue, and sue some more for complete compliance with their agenda. When all they preach is tolerance, it is so completely hypocritical. And not in the least bit funny.
  
  Glad to see SE Cupp is finally coming out as the bigot I always knew she was. What a pathetic attention seeking move.
  
  Report this comment
fb274
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:52pm
Well, good! Since her employment with MESSNBC she has been a clone of Tingle Matthews and Rachel Madcow combined.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- TASS50
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 9:34pm
  I can’t stand Rachel Meadows
  
  Report this comment
stopprintn
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:52pm
You wont be missed. Why cant ppl. see that all this same sex crap, is a direct attac on the first ammendment. If gay marriage is allowed, they can shut down or restrict what is said at the pulpit. It’s that simple.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- TASS50
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 9:32pm
  Well if they do that there should be counter suits too. Sue them right back. Boomer rang it too. I don’t believe in Gay marriage or even calling it a marriage, maybe we should just get rid of the word. I think if there is a divorce and their is children and third party or the bioligical parent should have to pay the support and maybe people will see what a mess this is. I might go to law school and become rich with all the law suits. Glad that women isn’t going to the CPAC, good ridence and adios amiga.
  
  Report this comment
gyro
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:51pm
taking a stand is harder than riding the band wagon

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- walnutportconservative
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:58pm
  If you don’t stand for something you will fall.
  
  Report this comment
- gyro
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:07pm
  walnutportconservative — sometimes you have to be the only one standing
  they can stone you but they can not break you
  :)
  
  Report this comment
- ...sam
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:18pm
  one could say she is riding the lib band wagon…
  
  Report this comment
- Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:23pm
  I commend her for standing up for Gay Conservatives, if only the left would do the same thing for Blue Dog Democrats.
  
  Report this comment
- Fubared
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:51pm
  Hey, while we are on that topic, Bernake defends endless pumping too-
  http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-26/bernanke-defends-asset-purchases-as-benefits-outweigh-risks.html
  
  Report this comment
Stevsea
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:51pm
Is S.E. Cupp a gay woman? I know she’s an atheist. I couldn’t care either way, just curious.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Realman30
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:12pm
  Yes, it’s as obvious as the glasses on her face. Just like Randy Maddox and Tammy Bruce, when she turn out lights at night, she lies with another woman.
  
  . . . Big deal!
  
  Report this comment
dstrider
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:51pm
Sounds like SE is more and more MSNBC and less and less Blaze. I appreciate everyone point of view but I find it harder and harder to listen to SE. She very seldom utters a conservative comment. Her values seems to lean toward the progressive side. Probably needs to find a church and read the Bible a little.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- right_thinking_mama
  Posted on February 27, 2013 at 3:44pm
  Agreed. I bet SE’s pulling out of CPAC has less to do with the gay rights movement and more to do with the fact that she royally pissed off the conservative base and knows that she would have been sitting in a booth by herself texting Toure the whole time because we don’t care about her anymore.
  
  Report this comment
Cavallo
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:51pm
So long. The purpose of the Gay Marriage movement is to use the power of the State to force people at gun point to accept a deviant sexual perversion as normal and mainstream.

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
moon8
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:51pm
Gay ‘marriage’ is not a part of the party platform and the majority of conservatives do not suppport redefining marriage. And 4 former govenors is hardly anything to shout about. Most people will not have heard of the 80 republicans that signed the brief

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
zorro
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:49pm
S.E. Cupp can go to hell. That said, it does appear as though CPAC is going out of their way to continue to split the party. We don’t all have to agree on everything. We’re not liberals.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- lisalake
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:56pm
  Excellent comment. CPAC is irrevelant.
  
  Report this comment
- youshuthehellup
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:56pm
  Amen!!!!
  
  Report this comment
shorthanded12
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:49pm
Stop ramming (no pun intended) dam gay rights issues down “Our” throats. This just shows S.E. Cupp is not a conservative. PERIOD!!!!!!!!!!!! Dead issue in my book. Is Gay rights going to get this country out of debt? I think not. Barry destroyed the military with his gay junk. Cry me a river Ms Cupp I wont loose no sleep over your childish redric.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Ghandi was a Republican
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:57pm
  For real. “Gay” rights ? Are they different form “Human” rights?
  Acknowledging “Gays” as some needful or lesser community is to marginalize and denigrate them.
  “HUMAN RIGHTS” – Not “some other kind of human” rights.
  
  Report this comment
- oldandtired
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:19pm
  agreed
  
  Report this comment
GoodStuff
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:49pm
SE Cupp is not to be trusted. Any kook libertarian more concerned with pot and homosexual “marriage” than they are with economic issues is a total fraud…they just want the Left to like them. Now Beck has embraced homosexual “marriage”?? And he wants me to give him money to expand his brand? No thanks.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- GhostOfJefferson
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:53pm
  That has to be the single most stupid comment I’ve seen come from “our side” in a long, long while. You clearly don’t understand libertarianism (though I’m sure you think you do) and you clearly are all about dividing up the pro-freedom movement to thus ensure that the Establishment GOP continues to lose elections. Your problems of course, but your comment just struck me as the wild eyed rantings of a guy on a street corner who screams at passing pedestrians.
  
  Report this comment
- 00100111
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:12pm
  The more and more comments I read like this from “our side”, the more I realize I’m not on “this side”. This is an absolutely asinine comment. Do you really not see that Republicans are just as big govt statist as Democrats? Do you not see how far to the left Republicans have moved? Do you not understand that you can be against gay marriage and smoking pot but also know that is your personal opinion that you can’t force others to abide by? “Conservatives” whine so much when “Liberals” use govt to force their ideas on everyone, but then turn around and hesitate not to force their ideas on us as well. Big govt is big govt no matter what side you’re on.
  
  If there truly are “more important things” than gay marriage and smoking pot, why do “conservatives” always go after social issues first thing when in power?
  
  Report this comment
- 00100111
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:16pm
  btw, Ghost. My comment was to Good, not you.
  
  Report this comment
- myptofvu
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:22pm
  I’m one of those Kooks you speak of and I don’t like pot at all but what I do care about is Black Markets which tend to cause more harm than the illicit substance being traded. For example: I have never heard of anyone dying from an overdose of marijuana but deaths resulting from the drug trade are too numerous to count.
  
  Besides the arise of a Black Market is an indicator that something is wrong in a system. If the system were functioning normally there would be no need for a BM. For example: there is now a large BM for cigarettes due to the high taxes levied on them.
  
  What the powers to be always get wrong is that they try to extinguish these Black Markets instead of understanding that they are an indicator that something is wrong with the way you’re doing things. Trying to fight against a BM is futile and has never worked, remember the prohibition? Before we outlawed alcohol there was no organized crime in this Country, Prohibition caused the Mafia.
  
  Back to pot, like I said I think its a harmful substance but if I had my choice I would rather legalize drugs than live with the negative elements that the drug trade brings with it.
  
  Oh and as a Libertarian, as long as what I do doesn’t harm others its none of your damn business.
  
  Report this comment
- GhostOfJefferson
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:29pm
  @00100111
  
  Yeah, I kind of figured that out by context. :)
  
  Report this comment
- DLV
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:09pm
  Goodstuff- Again where does it say Beck has supported homosexuality?
  
  Report this comment
- Eastinfection
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:21pm
  …and what MYPTOFVU said.
  
  Report this comment
- LeftOfRightOfLeft
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:48pm
  I personally am for freedoms from my government. My government shouldn’t be telling me how to live my life. Maybe I’m just one of these old fashioned people who thinks freedom is good and the rest of these people beating their bibles are for government control and tyranny. Let the gays get married so we can all have freedom.
  
  Report this comment
moreteaplease
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:48pm
Bye!!!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
shorelineliz
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:48pm
See. C.E. Cupp run. See C.E.Cupp fall. See C.E. Cupp stay down. See C.E. Cupp get run over by a bulldozer. See. C.E. Cupp go work for MSNBC.

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- RIDEMODELS
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 8:15pm
  Lets replace her with Stacy Dash…….Stacy sounds like more a conservative anyway.
  
  SE Cupp has never had to work for a Gay man……Have fun sucker……There is no such thing as sexual harassment in the Gay workplace….Adios.
  
  Funny thing about Christians though….They can forgive stupid women.
  
  Report this comment
wilbstal
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:47pm
Well I just lost ant respect for Se cupp her true colors are coming out now. I wont watch real News as long as she is on it. Join a gay group dont dirty up CPAC. Ill never watch her or Will Cain as they are Little Leftys at heart

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- FloraBelleza
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:28pm
  I’m glad she not going to speak to represent us, because she is not one of us anyway, this girl is fake. I never trust her, she was never a republican, but only a opportunist to grab the chance to make money. Well, better said, she never going to be a conservative woman, beside she have a agenda, and the agenda call SNBC. I believe she had been pay for be a mole inside the Blaze, maybe Glenn knows, they all are a big family.
  
  Report this comment
EQUALIZER
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:47pm
Fine S.E., stay out and keep out!

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply
GhostOfJefferson
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:47pm
“S.E. Cupp Pulls Out of CPAC Until Groups Groups Gay Republicans Are Embraced”

That’s some fine editing there, Blaze.

You know this whole “gay marriage” thing makes me think. Perhaps we’re not free by what we get government to do on our behalf, rather, we’re free when we start acting on our own behalf and stop seeking approval from government.

Gays want to get “married”, great, find a church that supports it, not my worry. Want a civil union? Great, not my issue. Want me to pretend that on any given day any more than 3-5% of the entire population falls into the LGBT community? Sorry, I don’t buy the bologna.

As to Cupp. It seems to me that, what, with the U.S. falling apart at the seams and liberty, as in BOR liberty, being daily threatened, not to mention constant “stimulus” to ensure the collapse of our economy, that perhaps there are items that a bit higher priority than “gay marriage”. Just sayin’. But hey, whatever, I’m a libertarian, it’s not like CPAC represents my views anyway, I mean they’re inviting Romney right?

Report this comment
Log in to ReplyReply
- Fubared
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:53pm
  Well said, again.
  
  Report this comment
- lisalake
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:58pm
  Ditto.
  
  Report this comment
- kadster01
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:59pm
  Yes, indeed. Very well stated. Enough with the “issues” designed to distract us from real problems.
  
  Report this comment
- Zipit
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:14pm
  Don’t care much about CPAC! Won’t miss CCUP!!
  
  Report this comment
- UNALIEN
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:17pm
  Gay rights are a myth,, “equality” does not mean “sameness”,, they are trying to redefine marriage and subvert the family values,, they can have a union all they want but admit the reality, it does diminish the meaning and family structure if it is a Marriage.
  
  What next Muslim imams want to be cardinals based on “equality” … marriage is a man and women, if they want a union, fine, call it something else..
  
  they are subverting American morality by Cultural Marxism…
  
  Report this comment
- GhostOfJefferson
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:27pm
  If they wish to get married, it doesn’t redefine my marriage. And as I mentioned, they are likely about 3% of the population, including bisexuals who may well be “normally” married. I really, really don’t care.
  
  What I do care about is that with everything going on right now, there’s no finer way to distract the Right than to say the word “gay” or “sex”. It’s like the Siren’s Song that brings around nearly the entire camp to steer towards the island where all the lotus eaters are located. It’s just so damned easy to take everybody’s eyes off of the real liberty grabs going on now. And I hold Cupp complicit in this as well as the people here and likely elsewhere that will, on cue, get their dander up over this.
  
  Good gravy people, we’re literally ten minutes away from civil war and fire in the streets, and both Cupp and most of y’all are worried about gays? Get some damned perspective, the lot of you!
  
  Report this comment
- Eastinfection
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:49pm
  GHOST…
  
  Not much i could say without plagiarizing you.
  
  Good on ya ole sod.
  
  Report this comment
- UNALIEN
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 4:55pm
  GHOSTOFJEFFERSON
  
  I disagree,, it is part of cultural Marxism,, it may not redefine your idea of marriage, but your children’s and grandchildren’s marriage will not be valued or defined as yours is today. This is the destructive insidiousness of cultural Marxism,, It destroys the values of the civil society gradually..
  
  If gays get to redefine “Marriage” then the union of a man and women has been diminished forever. It isn’t about equality, it is about destroying the culture,,, they have been successfully destroying the family for 50 years this is the nail in the coffin… the family will become a construct of and dependent on the State,,,
  
  Equality does not mean sameness,,, it is a political term… used to divide and destroy,,
  
  but I do agree that is minor in the scheme of things.. cultural death by a thousand cuts
  
  Report this comment
- Eastinfection
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:13pm
  UNALIEN…
  
  Your ideal relies on the State to authenticate a religious rite.
  
  Is that really your intention?
  
  Report this comment
- UNALIEN
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 5:46pm
  EASTINFECTION
  
  First, I am not against gay unions, I am against the State and a minority redefining the traditional cultural definition of marriage that being a man and a women…. this is the foundation of the family,,, this is NOT about equality, it is about continuing the destruction of the family, cultural marxism… by destroying the family the State becomes the parent and encourages dependancy and control over the culture forever…
  
  they are systematically dismantling the American values and culture… by elevating a minority under the phoney political concept of equality
  
  As a standalone issue it is minor, but when you know the game that is being played, it is part of the war on the family…
  
  Report this comment
- Eastinfection
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 6:06pm
  UNALIEN…
  
  i appreciate every moral and cultural argument you make… and agree in so much.
  
  But that doesn’t change the fact that married couples get access to IRS benefits unmarried couples don’t get.
  Marriage is either a religious rite instituted and con-validated by the church or it is a government-sanctioned business pact- it can not be both, successfully.
  
  Report this comment
- UNALIEN
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 6:54pm
  EASTINFECTION
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 6:06pm
  UNALIEN…
  
  But that doesn’t change the fact that married couples get access to IRS benefits unmarried couples don’t get.
  Marriage is either a religious rite instituted and con-validated by the church or it is a government-sanctioned business pact- it can not be both, successfully.
  ————–
  
  not so, you don’t need to change the definition of marriage you only need to change the tax code..
  
  some jurisdictions recognize “common law relationships” in the tax code based on cohabitation of 1 or 2 years (varies). No church marriage
  
  Report this comment
- glassaudioguy
  Posted on February 26, 2013 at 11:44pm
  @UNALIEN- pointing out SSM is part of the cultural Marxist agenda but saying it’s a minor point is devaluing its significance. It’s the other side of the same ideological coin that has given us massive debt.
  
  Report this comment
Triple7
Posted on February 26, 2013 at 3:45pm
She works at MSNBC,no?

Report this comment
Log in to Reply Reply

It appears that you have Javascript Disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser preferences for a better user experience on TheBlaze. You can not comment without Javascript enabled.